MOUNT MORELAND, South Africa — Wetlands — critical for the health of South Africa's coasts and river systems — already have been degraded or seriously altered by human activity, and experts fear global warming threatens them further.
As talks to shore up the international response to global warming entered their second and crucial week in the South African coastal city of Durban, environmentalists led a tour of a wetlands area nearby.
It's a spot where spectators start coming an hour before sunset. They set up deck chairs or spread blankets, take a bottle of white wine from the cooler and a block of cheese or snacks, settle down with binoculars, and hope.
This Sunday, the barn swallows didn't put on their show.
Millions of birds, having migrated more than 5,000 miles from Europe and Britain for the southern summer, usually roost in the tall reeds poking through the surface of Lake Victoria at the foot of a hillock called Mount Moreland.
The weather is chilly — at least 9 degrees Fahrenheit (5 degrees Celsius) cooler than normal, says resident Angie Wilken. And the migration is two or three weeks late this year, she says. The birds are still leaving Europe.
"I'm constantly questioning. Is it just the weather? Is that really it?" she says.
Stormy future
Scientists are reluctant to blame climate change for any single unusual weather event or short-term departure from the norm. But studies and computer modeling show that man-made emissions of carbon dioxide are disrupting normal weather — both hot and cold spells — around the globe, causing more storms, droughts and floods and affecting wildlife.
If the planet continues to warm at the current pace, one-third of all animal and plant species may become extinct by the end of the century, according to an authoritative panel of U.N. scientists.
In Durban, climate ministers and other top officials, including U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, are expected for the last week of negotiations.
They are under pressure to conclude by Friday with pledges to cut greenhouse gas emissions after their current commitments expire next year under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.
They also need to make progress on raising billions of dollars to help poor countries cope with global warming if the talks are to be deemed a success.
On Mount Moreland, the roosting of barn swallows, which fill the sky and then swoop onto the sage-green reeds in a single massive ball up to 3 million birds thick, is one of nature's most spectacular displays.
"The horizon just starts spewing them over the top. Then they form a tighter unit, moving left and right. And as they turn, they peel and drop into the reeds as fast as stones dropping. And if you're not watching you miss it," says Wilken, who watches it nearly every evening from October through April.
'Bedtime stories'
The sound before the birds settle for the night is like water running, she says. "We call it bedtime stories."
The vegetation of wetlands like Lake Victoria provides a haven for birds and wildlife, purifies water of nutrients spilled from agriculture and provides a livelihood to poor people who plant its fringes with vegetables or marigolds.
Experts worry about predictions that as the Earth's average temperatures rise, South Africa's east coast will become more arid and the west coast around Durban will get more rainfall, raising the risk of floods and erosion.
"If the wetlands dry out, the impact will be huge on small farmers who exist close to the line," says Damian Waters, a wetlands expert for the Wildlife and Environment Society of South Africa.
Waters' group and others are working to protect the wetlands and the 250 estuaries that break up South Africa's coastline. Collaborating with local and national authorities, the nonprofit groups are producing detailed topographical maps of wetland areas and how they integrate with farmland and industry.
They encourage big water users in the area to conserve water and replant climate-resilient indigenous vegetation, which has struggled to compete with invasive foreign trees and shrubs that use more water.
Disappearing wetlands could mean trouble for the barn swallows of Mount Moreland, where Wilken won approval from landowners over the years to clear an area for bird watchers to view the natural wonder of the roost.
Some 40 million European barn swallows pass through the area each year, she says, maintaining a low population of summer insects. "They do a huge service when they come to this country," she said.
But she's concerned about a new commercial development and a nearby airport, whose approach path is directly over the field of reeds and whose runways disrupt the normal flow of rainwater into the valley.
"I'm constant worrying," she says. "Is nature going to prevail?"


And in a related story this morning in Americaland, Americalanders continued down the highway as usual, ignoring the tsunami of climate-related observations from around the world.
There is an old saying "Follow the Money".
This conference is not about 'global warming', but how much 'poor countries' expect to get from 'rich countries' as 'damages'.
In the end, nothing will be done about 'climate change' except some meaningless rhetoric, and the 'rich countries' will set up a fund to distribute to keep the 'poor countries' quiet.
The reality is that the 'climate change' we expect over the next 90 years is about the same as we've already seen over the last 150 years, and mankind will do what they have done throughout history - Adapt.
This is just another way for some 'rich' people, like Al Gore, to get richer by talking about it and making 'investments' to take advantage of political gamesmanship.
torngenes "And in a related story this morning in Americaland, Americalanders continued down the highway as usual, ignoring the tsunami of climate-related observations from around the world."
Are man-made activities contributing to 'global warming'? Probably, but the REAL question is "What do we do about it?" As I see it, we have two basic choices (or a combination of them);
1 - Spend Tens of $Trillions, likely in a vain attempt to change the unchangeable, and dramatically lower the living standards of people throughout the World. The World's largest carbon emitter (China) has already said 'No Thanks' to that.
2 - Simply adapt, as we have done throughout history.
Guess which one will 'win out' in the end?
"throughout history" we have not been 7,008,000,000 humans and we are not the only inhabitants of the planet. Changes are happening at rates too fast for many species to adapt (in an evolutionary sense). However, as we are unable to concern ourselves with how other humans are forced to live, we certainly aren't going to concern ourselves with nonhumans.
Costly? You bet. We cannot speak for China which is now emits more carbon than the US (with, to be fair, almost 4 times the population). That is such a weak argument. I am responsible for me. Just because my neighbor chooses to burn gasoline for amusement (car races, dirt bikes, joy-riding, etc) does not change my responsibility to the planet.
My opinion: there will be no win for anyone. Eh, maybe the jellyfish.
Why to blame this on the USA. Worry about China, Indonesa, Burma, Korea, Pakastan, India, on and on. Our polution is nothing compared to these people.
Nature will always prevail. It just won't be the same. Changes have occurred since the beginning of time and so it will continue. Species (and continents!) will fall and rise and will be lost--and new ones will come forth. It's the ever-changing expression of Life itself.......always going beyond what has been--to "what's next". Can't stop it--resistance is futile. Just be along for the ride and enjoy the moment(s).
Perhaps they should try carrying less coconuts.
Damn, beat me to it.
Nice 'thedeb'.. Perhaps they are really African Swallows?
If we continue on this track "nature" will prevail. We just won't be part of it.
Its nature's way.
More global warming/climate change nonsense.
UN global warming BS concludes via an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that humans are responsible for emissions that are increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gasses, specifically; CO2. Accordingly, they predict that if left unchecked, the global temperature will increase and we will all be doomed.
They go on to introduce numerous assessment and supplementary reports from 1990 through 2007 and a future assessment report for 2014, all dire predictions of doom and gloom if we don't mend our ways and impose taxes on just about everything. (Isn't it funny how the solution always entails taking our money?)
In any event, all their many reports and assessments have concluded that climate change (they no longer like to use the term "global warming") is due primarily to excessive emissions of CO2 and that significant amounts of these emissions are being trapped in our atmosphere, hence our need to reduce these emissions.
But wait; there has been empirical evidence to the contrary. Read on:
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the
peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed. In fact, over this period there has actually been an ongoing slight cooling trend.
What they did at the UN was to fabricate the amount of emissions retained by the atmosphere so their computer models would produce the desired result. The NASA satellites actual data debunks ruse this quite nicely.
In conclusion, don't look for this climate change bunch to go quietly into the night as there's far too much money and power at stake. As for the NASA data, this bunch has pretty much decided to simply
ignore it as if it doesn't exist.
funny how your 'far too much money and power at stake' doesn't mention the flood of denial stories.
Right on Willy!
Like the glaciers in the Himalayas will be melted by 2035. After further review, it was found that the numbers were “transposed” at it’s really 2350! Well numbers are hard sometimes, even for the dudes with the 17 lb brains at the IPCC (or is it 71 lb brains?) No matter.
From comparisons of the Earth to Venus to more intense storms to the Snows of Kilimanjaro disappearing, all can be easily proven to be balderdash! And it looks like they found “the missing heat” ! The heat they surmised defied physics and sank into the ocean. That’s great news…we aren’t going to die!
I marvel at this. Have you ever read Eisenhower’s farewell speech where he warns about the “evil” military industrial complex? In that same speech (but much less quoted) you’ll find this:
And at the end of the day Ike was really saying to watch out for Congress because they’ll sell your ass down the river for votes! Be vigilant!
Yep, global warming has made the temp there 9 degrees cooler than normal. What's normal? The last 300 years or the last 3,000 years weather?
It was -11F at the house last night and that's not normal. This global warming is going to freeze us to d e ath.
Ask any climate change denier if they are willing to sit in their garage with the door closed and the engine running.
This usually forces them to admit that poison is emitted by car exhaust. Now ask them how millions of cars spewing poison can have absolutely no cause on living organisms. Then tell them to stop being obtuse and take responsibility for their actions.
Rinse, repeat.
Dear Reality Challenged Blogger aka sarcastoid
The poison your car spits out is called carbon monoxide. Carbon dioxide is the phantom stuff that’s going to kill us all. Not only are numbers hard, so are words!. It’s the D sound like doggy…try it…D…D..Di..Diox…
You exhaled it as you typed your incoherent post. It’s also plant food; without it there would be no plants, hence no oxygen, hence life would be tough for the carbon-based units (people) currently infesting Earth. Try to learn the lingo before you engage dude CO2, Global Climate Disruption, Forcing.
Rinse, Repeat
More complete BS by the alarmists and the liberal media.
Check out this comparison of natural warming with so called man made warming.
It's the same rate people!
http://www.real-science.com/key-successful-climate-scientist-completely
And a new study points to winds being a factor in recent weather events. Again, man is not responsible.
http://www.news.wisc.edu/20095
Don't worry folks. The human species will one day be extinct. Mother earth looks after herself.
Not good!!!!!! The weather patterns are wobbling, there is no consistency anymore. Mid December in most parts of the U.S. should be dropping into the low 50's and 30's at night but now it is up into the 70's and down in the 50's at night early in the week and then cooler by the end of the week, then this switches again very very weird.
global warming naysayers would just look a the big picture u'll see how much countries are emitting carbon, such as coal burning in china and gasoline output in countries... just think about it.. all the carbon, such as gasoline, wood burning, coal, oil that was in the earth for millions of years , but now we humans are realeasing it into the air (as carbon)?? so wat is the outcome of all the carbon in the air now and as time goes on ? carbon is wat we breATH out .. it kills us , if we breath all carbon in..
I think both sides agree: Humans aren't responsible.