
Athit Perawongmetha / Getty Images
Thailand's King Bhumibol Adulyadej has reigned since 1946.
BANGKOK - From a windowless room in a Bangkok suburb, computer technicians scour thousands of websites, Facebook pages and tweets night and day. Their mission: to suppress what is regarded as one of Thailand's most heinous crimes -- insulting the monarchy.
The government calls this its "war room," part of a zero-tolerance campaign that uses the world's most draconian lese-majeste laws to stamp out even the faintest criticism of 84-year-old King Bhumibol Adulyadej, the world's longest-reigning monarch.
Critics call it a "witch hunt" and few are spared if they fall foul of the process. Dubbed "Uncle SMS", 61-year-old cancer sufferer Amphon Tangnoppaku was jailed for 20 years last month for sending four text messages deemed to have disparaged Queen Sirikit.
According to the Bangkok Post, the grandfather claimed in court that he had been a victim of forgery and didn't know how to send a text message.
The ruling prompted outrage. On Saturday, Human Rights Watch criticized the "shocking" severity of recent penalties for lese-majeste and urged Thailand to amend the law.
The offense is punishable by up to 15 years in prison, possibly more if there is violation of the 2007 Computer Crimes Act, which has been used to block more than 70,000 websites, many for lese-majeste, others for pornography or cyber fraud.
Washington-based pro-democracy group Freedom House says the two laws give Thai authorities "carte blanche to clamp down on any form of expression."
Some Thais had hoped Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, whose party members are among those accused of lese-majeste, would reform the law. But she is treading carefully, aware her opponents in the military and royalist establishment could seize on any hint of disloyalty to the monarchy to bring her down.
Independent analysts say the use of lese-majeste could undermine those it was designed to protect if the backlash against the law grows.
The tough-sounding Cyber Security Operation Centre remains focused, however.
"We don't have any impressive equipment to track suspicious Internet activity," said Nut Payongsri, an official in the vast government complex. "In most cases, we hear about misuse via calls to our hotline. We check each case and report them to the police."
Sensitive topics
The king is in poor health and has spent the past two years in hospital. He made a rare public appearance in a wheelchair on Monday at celebrations to mark his birthday.
His health and the succession are sensitive topics. Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn has yet to command the same respect as his father, who is seen as almost divine in the majority Buddhist country.
Lese-majeste shields the king, queen, crown prince or regent from criticism.
In the latest case, the exact content of the messages Amphon was accused of sending is unclear -- disclosing it could also mean prison. He denied the charges and wept in court.
Undeterred by the outcry, Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Minister Anudit Nakorntab warned Thais they could face similar punishment if they clicked "like" or "share" next to Facebook postings about the case that were considered offensive to the throne.
An ICT Ministry official told Reuters that Thais who received anti-monarchy messages by email or on their personal Facebook walls and failed to delete them were also in violation.
"We would take them to court and prosecute them," said the official, who asked to remain anonymous because he was not authorized to speak to the media. "It is against the law to do such a thing and as a result, they will be fined and jailed."
The ICT Ministry said it was in talks with Facebook to block pages hosted outside Thailand carrying offensive content its cyber police were powerless to block. The U.S.-based social networking site did not respond to questions from Reuters.
Political weapon?
Some cases are overtly political, others just bizarre, such as that of a Swiss man jailed for spray-painting a portrait of the king because he could not buy alcohol on the monarch's birthday under Thai law. He was pardoned and deported after a short prison stint.
Lese-majeste complaints can be made by any citizen and, because of the sensitivity of the allegations, police usually feel compelled to probe them.
The army filed charges of lese-majeste in May against academic Somsack Jeamteerasakul for comments he allegedly made in a web posting about the king's youngest daughter, Princess Chulabhorn Walailak, who is not protected by the laws.
Chiranuch Premchaiporn, director of online newspaper Prachatai, is accused of failing to delete anti-monarchy postings fast enough. Political activist Chotisak Onsoong is accused of insulting the monarchy by refusing to stand during the royal anthem that precedes movie screenings in Thailand.
Thai-born American Lerpong Wichaikhamma, also known as Joe Gordon, pleaded guilty to lese-majeste in October after being arrested during a visit to Thailand for having posted a web link to a Thai translation of a banned book about the king.
Critics of lese-majeste say it is being used as a political weapon to stifle opponents, pointing to the huge jump in cases since the 2006 coup that overthrew former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, Yingluck's brother, and triggered a polarizing political crisis.
Thailand's lese-majeste laws date from the start of the 20th century. Other countries with constitutional monarchies, such as Spain and the Netherlands, have such laws but cases are nowadays extremely rare.
David Streckfuss, a scholar who monitors lese-majeste laws, said 478 known cases had been submitted to the Thai Criminal Court since the coup, and the 397 cases between 2006 and 2009 compared with an average four or five a year in the preceding 15 years.
The conviction rate, Streckfuss says, is currently 94 percent.
Thailand's military, which sees protecting the crown as its top priority, is behind a number of complaints, particularly those against members of the pro-Thaksin "red shirt" movement, which fought troops in the street in 2009 and 2010.
Thaksin and the red shirts have been accused of republican leanings, charges they deny. But some take issue with the punishment handed down for lese-majeste.
"In the time of absolute monarchy, the highest punishment was three years, so how is it that now, with our constitutional monarchy, the punishment has been increased to up to 15 years?" said Weng Tojirakarn, a red shirt leader and parliamentarian.
'Futile and self-defeating'
The police and judiciary feel obliged to follow up accusations of lese-majeste -- for fear of being accused of disrespect themselves -- and so the charge has become an easy weapon for political groups to use against each other.
In the case of Thaksin, allegations against him of lese-majeste were used by the royalist "yellow shirts" to draw supporters to huge street rallies that helped undermine his government, and the claims were cited by the military as one reason for the 2006 coup.
The Santiprachatham Network, a group of academics and social activists, started a campaign against a "flawed judicial system" in the wake of Amphon's 20-year sentence.
Some newspapers that for years were reluctant to carry stories on lese-majeste now call for a review of the law.
"The idea that discussion of the lese-majeste law is somehow disloyal to the monarchy is emotionally loaded but empty. The law cannot affect love of the monarch," the Bangkok Post said in an editorial, describing the cyber war as "futile and self-defeating."
Anand Panyarachun, a former premier and senior statesman, last week rebuked those who had politicized the law and said ordinary citizens should not be allowed to file complaints that undermined rather than strengthened the monarchy.
"The harshness of the penalty should be reviewed," Anand said. "Many Thais try to protect him, try to defend him. In actual fact the consequence is we ourselves are doing a lot of damage to the monarchy or even to the king himself."
Reuters and msnbc.com staff contributed to this report.
Read more content from msnbc.com and NBC News:
- We are the median: Military makes $50,000 feel like more
- NBC: Downed drone spied on Iran nuke facilities
- Activists ask: Undercover cop? Or one of us?
- A consumer's tale of a credit report 'Catch 22'
- Sandusky's dinner with alleged victims raises questions
- We are the median: Living on $50,000 a year
- Kids pay biggest price for world's gold craving


The fact that the 'king' would prosecute his own people for having free thought is an insult to himself and his monarchy, no peasant required. In Dutch they have a saying, 'those who would offend their nose offend their own face'.
Note to Thai king. Power attracts, force repels. A leader works from a position of power and not force. You can not force your people to love you. Love them first and accept what you get in return.
Suggestion to Thai king, apologize to your people for allowing such laws to remain in place.
All true, but there's a problem: they already love him. Overwhelmingly. As in, there's relatively little he could do to become truly unpopular. The man is like a god. And in any event he seems so weak now from his medical issues that I'm not sure he could effectively tell the military and others who are essentially using his stature for their own political ends to stop it.
Agreed. And if I recalled correctly, he once stated that he desliked the law himself, although that remark seems to have gotten lost and/or ignored by everyone else.
Someone does need to do something about it though, as much as I respect the king, the use of that law is getting to the point of stupid.
AC Rob... Thanks for the info. I am glad he has taken such position.
It's not the King that's prosecuting people. People prosecute each other for lese majeste while the King is forced to watch from the side, unable to do anything.
SPARTAN-501,
There have been numerous cases where a person was convicted of insulting the Thai King or family, in the Thai Courts...
The King then pardoned them...
The King may not be able to change the laws, but he can and does effect the end result...
The Thai King has already instructed the Politicians to stop using this law for political gain and that the people should have the right to comment on the Monarchy...
The Thai Democrats and the Yellow Shirts have ignored this and still use it for their political purposes...
IMO - It is the POLITICIANS who are INSULTING the KING by not following his wishes...
Perhaps it is the king who should be arrested then? I say yes, arrested imprisoned and deleted.
The Thai king sucks...try and arrest me now..
I heard he was a tyrant bent on destroying freedoms and enslaving his people, a true coward with a closet fetish for beasties, male beasties...
try that on Thai King...
Abuse of power is abuse of power, I don't give a flying F who it is.
Except that it's not the king who is pushing the lese majeste laws or enforcement of them. So, your comments are actually misdirected.
Vanity Vanity Vanity are the 3 words that come to mind.
If a person become a "deity," (or close to it), why would the deity worry about name calling? Simply smite the name caller with a lightning bolt and move on. What? No lightning bolt?! I guess the deity puts on his pants the same way I do then, one leg at a time. Reality can be much more enlightening than some draconian, outdated mindset. It's time to move on to a more "modern" time frame--like the 21st century. This old crap is just that--crap. And it needs to be flushed.
I lived in Thailand for nearly ten years. King Bhumibol is himself against such laws. A couple years back a drunken Australian man (normal state for Aussies, the white trash of Asia) drew a moustache on a poster of the king. For this he was sentenced to ten years in prison. Immediately after the sentence was handed down, the king came on TV and pardoned the Aussie. The king also said that such laws were silly and unjust. The king has asked the government several times to abolish such arcane laws. Historically, he seems to be a genuinely benevolent king. I've read that some members of the royal family have over the years tried to assassinate him for spending too much royal money on social projects. Of course, the Thai government denies this.
Very hard to read an article that continually misuses the term "lese-majeste" even though the article itself correctly defines it. You cannot be "charged for lese-majeste" or "arrested for violating lese-majeste." Lese-Majeste is not a crime. It's a concept. I think the literal translation to English is something like, "hands off the king."
You could be charged or arrested for bad-mouthing the king - whatever form that may take. But not for "lese-majeste-ing."
The king of Thailand is a great man and has done more for that country than any other monarch in history, for any country, that I know of.
These kind of laws are not good for any country and should not exist. I'm sure, if the king wasn't so ill, he wouldn't agree laws like this are necessary.
I hope Thailand doesn't suffer too much when this king passes. There is great uncertainty in Thailand about what will happen when he does. Long live the king.
The current kind does NOT agree that these laws are necessary. I remember reading some time ago that he wanted these laws off the books. People in Thailand love this guy. It's the government they don't like - and apparently with good reason.
The King mentioned multiple times in the past that such laws are silly. He's tried to imply that by allowing such laws to exist, it's an insult to the monarchy. Sadly none of his attempts worked and the law is still there, unchanged.
Thai politicians claim to fight for the King, but they're really just fighting for themselves with absolutely no regard for the monarchy.
People in this country really need to be aware that this is what happens when a leader wants what is best for his country, i.e., absolute control over the masses. Don't think this can only happen to a percentage of the people who dissent against their leader. Once the dissenters are taken care of, those loyal to the leader are at risk.
The King is against such laws. People prosecute each other for lese majeste to suit their own needs.
King Bhumibol is revered in Thailand like a living god. Anyone critical of the monarch is deemed committing sin.
Kind of like Islam when it comes to Mohammed.
Revered is the correct word for what the people of Thailand feel for their King...
Through his ACTIONS, he has garnered their RESPECT, for his service to their country...
After living for years in Thailand, I can say they appreciate his leadership and knowledge, but do not regard him as a Deity or God. There is a difference...
The last I heard, Thailand is an independent nation. That gives it the right to rule. And, that makes how they rule none of our business. Should we take Thailand to be a client state of ours, then we can impose our laws on them.
But until that time, we should stay the hell out of their internal affairs.
If the King forgot what he said about the law, then this senile should quit the monarchy. Nobody respect him now because of it. Respect should be earned and not demanded.