'Memogate': New scandal in Pakistan sets alight old tensions

By NBC's Amna Nawaz in New York, and Fakhar Rehman in Islamabad

Since assuming the presidency in Pakistan three years ago, Asif Ali Zardari has been hit with allegations of poor governance and corruption, watched his coalition government fall apart and has even seen his health falter. But this latest challenge, in the form of a Supreme Court inquiry into a political scandal dubbed "Memogate" by Pakistan's media, is testing Zardari's hold on power and has put his civilian government squarely at odds with the military establishment once again.

The court's investigation is centered on what -- if anything -- Zardari knew about a secret memo passed to U.S. officials after the May raid on Osama bin Laden's compound. The memo's existence was revealed by American-born, Pakistan-origin businessman Mansoor Ijaz in an October piece in The Financial Times. The eventually leaked contents of the memo -- requesting U.S. help to rein in Pakistan's military and intelligence in exchange for heavy American influence over national security deicsion in Pakistan -- "infuriated many in the armed forces," according to a senior military officer. "It will have a significant bearing on the political scenario if proven true."

The scandal has already forced the resignation of one senior Pakistani official -- then-ambassador to Washington, Hussain Haqqani -- who had played a crucial role in steadying the turbulent relations between America and Pakistan over the last few years, and now threatens to further destabilize Zardari's already-weak government.

Pakistan's military and its civilian government have a history of deep-seated tensions -- which occasionally boil over into full-blown coups -- dating back to the 1950s, when political parties began their struggle for supremacy in the early days of the country's independence. Zardari has himself felt the ire of the all-powerful army, once for attempting to bring the military's intelligence agency -- the ISI -- under civilian control, and again for pledging to dispatch the ISI chief to India after the November 2008 Mumbai attacks. Both times, his efforts were thwarted by the military. The government's distrust for the military and the military's disdain for the government provide the backdrop for every national crisis, of which there have been many this year alone.

Getting to the bottom of the Memogate scandal will not be easy. The case is already clouded with political motivation (it first brought to the Supreme Court by the leader of an opposition party, bent on dislodging Zardari from power), and every word of submitted testimony is first being parsed by the Pakistani press, then pieced together into wild speculation about legal conclusions.

Legal experts in Pakistan have offered a range of possible outcomes -- including Zardari being forced to resign, or being tried for treason, or his entire government collapsing. And while there is no firm timeline for proceedings beyond the first hearing on Monday, there is already, in much of the reporting, an assumption that such a memo could not have been drafted without the involvement of Zardari.

Despite a visit from Army Chief Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani to Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani's house today, after which a statement was released urging that military testimony in the case "not be misconstrued as a standoff between the Army and the government," the depositions given by Kayani and ISI chief Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha this week are certainly not helping the government's case.

Pasha, who met with Pakistani-American businessman and "Memogate" scandal-blower Mansoor Ijaz in London to review relevant evidence, testified that he believed the memo to be genuine and that Haqqani was involved. Kayani said in his testimony that the memo had already had "an impact on the national security," that there was "nothing denying the fact that the memo exists," and called for a swift and thorough investigation. Both statements, firmly stating that the memo exists, and that this issue needs to be looked into, fly in the face of previous government statements, denying the existence of the memo and dismissing the calls for inquiries as politically motivated.

U.S. Gen. Jim Jones, former national security adviser who acted as American conduit for the now-infamous memo, today submitted testimony that seemed to throw the government a lifeline, saying he had no reason to believe former Ambassador Haqqani was involved and that he did not believe the document to be credible.

Ijaz, the businessman at the heart of this controversy, also submitted testimony. The crucial deposition from President Zardari, however, has yet to surface. Zardari remains under doctor's care in Dubai, recovering from heart-related illness that forced a quick departure from Islamabad last week. He was scheduled to testify yesterday, and there is no word yet on when he will submit his side of the story.

Discuss this post

Obviously the military was outraged... this challenges their power. To me, though, it seems like they have no shortage of the stuff. I have to admit to some ignorance-- I don't know everything about the Pakistani political structure-- but, just from reading this article, it seems like they pretty much control everything, right? The only times the civilian government attempted to challenge the military, they lost.

You can say a lot of things about America. But I think that there's little doubt we got our civilian-contolled military right.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:33 PM EST

Civilian controlled military?

Last I checked our CONGRESS wasn't even consulted on the last war in Libya:

The War Powers Act of 1973, puts limits on the ability of the President to send American troops into combat areas without Congressional approval.

Where you been, under a rock?

Not to mention, most of the costs for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have not been funded through regular appropriations bills, which means:

The government is not accountable as to where the money is going, ie BLANK CHECK FROM TAXPAYERS

Seriously, you do not read the news?

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:27 AM EST
Reply

The Pakistan military has weapons at hand. The government of Pakistan doesn't have the arsenal to their disposal at a moments notice. The ISI and Pakistan military are hand in hand in destroying Pakistan. They have proved to the world that they harbor terrorists and knew about it. The Pakistani military and ISI will not do anything without help from China and Russia.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:03 PM EST

These Pakis are good in blackmailing and chest beating showing some big bugaboos like China, Russia or something.

Many are still in Cold War era thinking. So when they hear/listen China or Russia, Britain and France dance and the US sends troops. Look at Iraqi wars, Libya and many past cases. Then British and French vanish from the scene and act as good guys!

Islamic radical and terrorist exporting Pakistan is very dangerous to neighboring nations just like the US, Britain and many European nations.

Certainly China and Russia do irritate and bother the US and allies and will not do much beyond. Look at Iraq war and Libyan track records.

Even their Allah can’t help Pakis and their Pakistan leave alone the US, British, European nations.

    #2.1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:57 PM EST
    Reply

    Few people are talking about the Carter/CIA that funded the Muslim Terrorist, using the ISI, for years...

    Or the Chinese/Pakistan war games that have been occurring for the last 4+years and the military equipment/nuclear power plants that China is supplying to Pakistan...

    Pakistan has chosen the up-coming world power in Asia and is throwing the USA out...

    The Pakistan Military is the force that is really controlling the country. Much like the USA, where the POLITICIANS are becoming ineffective and the Military Complex and the background power brokers/elites are taking over...

      Reply#3 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:21 PM EST

      You are right on some points.

      China is very careful. It will not go too far. Certainly China and Russia do irrritate the US and allies for their past actions.

      Islamic extremism and terrorism hurts China too. Many Chinese in Pakistan have been killed.

      Pakistan is almost on the verge of bloody civil wars.

      You can keep this post and revisit it after ten years.

      If the US, British and European nations' props and dances are not there for Pakistan, Pakistan will be in the bloody mess like "democratic", "secular" Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE some more.

        #3.1 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:48 PM EST
        Reply

        yeah He's in Dubai for medical care, He's probably at Sinai hospital in the USA-- always DUBAI in the picture ??? every time you mention them we have a big problem of worldwide proportion..

          Reply#4 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:32 PM EST

          This article's start itself is wrong.

          Zardari before becoming President was known as Mr. ten percent. It must have certainly increased.

          Paki Supreme Court is another joke. Or else it should not have permitted genocides of minorities since 47.

          Military and intelligence are the key. Politicians don't count much and in the musical chair for powers, they are placed in power to show Pakistan is a "democracy" for many like the US to blow trumpets.

          The US and allies have been propping up some of the most retrograde, barbaric, beastly and bigoted rulers/nations like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and some more.

          Oh, I forgot: oill and oil companies decide the issues.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#5 - Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:41 PM EST

          Now his triumphal visit makes him a candidate for being a war criminal.

            Reply#6 - Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:51 PM EST

            i tihnk all this stuff is happening cause pakistan thereaten to leave the qualition against terror. which was a joke anyway cause from my side i've seen usa or nato to terror other nations for sakes of MDW and democracy. couldn'f find any example when usa was attacked by another nation except WWII.since pakistani politicians are corrupted and army has a long history to walk side by side with CIA, its very hard for them to abandon the war against terror. And there is always another option for american if pakistanis dont listen to them, invade the country and kill as many as you can. seems like only european(some) and americans are only humanb eing in this planet and the rest...., what you call apes?

              Reply#7 - Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:58 PM EST

              Pakistan is a state sponsor of terrorism.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#8 - Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:52 PM EST
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.