Russia, China veto UN rebuke of Syrian president

NBC's Ayman Mohyeldin reports.

Updated at 4:09 p.m. ET: Amid escalating bloodshed in the Syrian city of Homs, the U.N. Security Council on Saturday failed to pass a resolution calling on the Syrian president to step down.

Russia and China vetoed the resolution endorsing an Arab League call for Bashar Assad to leave power. The other 13 council members, including the U.S., France and Britain, voted in favor of the resolution.

The vote took place as Syrian forces pummeled the city of Homs with mortar and artillery fire that activists say killed more than 200 people in one of the bloodiest episodes of the uprising against Assad's regime. The U.N. says more than 5,400 people have been killed over almost 11 months in a Syrian government crackdown on civilian protests.


NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.

"The United States is disgusted that a couple of members of this Council continue to prevent us from fulfilling our sole purpose here -- addressing an ever-deepening crisis in Syria and a growing threat to regional peace and security," said Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N.

"This is a great disappointment to the people of Syria and the Middle East, and to all supporters of democracy and human rights," a spokesperson for U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said. "It undermines the role of the United Nations and the international community in this period when the Syrian authorities must hear a unified voice calling for an immediate end to its violence against the Syrian people."

NBC's Richard Engel and Ali Arouzi report on the escalating tension between the two nations.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said it had not been possible to work constructively with Russia ahead of the vote. "I thought that there might be some ways to bridge, even at this last moment, a few of the concerns that the Russians had. I offered to work in a constructive manner to do so. That has not been possible,'' she told reporters at a security conference in Munich.

Syria has been a key Russian ally since Soviet times and Moscow has opposed any U.N. call that could be interpreted as advocating military intervention or regime change.

Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin told reporters that he was encouraged by statements about "the intention to continue diplomatic efforts" and noted that the Security Council is "not the only diplomatic tool on the planet."

Churkin said that Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and the country's foreign intelligence chief, Mikhail Fradkov, will meet with Assad in Damascus on Tuesday, without providing specifics on the purpose of that trip.

Russia had expressed concerns about the draft text, saying it feared the resolution would lead to the kind of military intervention and regime change seen in Libya after last year's council action intended to protect civilians from attacks by forces loyal to strongman Moammar Gadhafi.

A view of houses that residents said were damaged during a military crackdown on protesters against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, in Rasten near Homs.

After Saturday's vote, Churkin accused fellow council members of being inflexible.

"We greatly regret this result of our joint work" on the resolution, he said.

Earlier, President Barack Obama issued a statement calling the latest attack on Homs "an unspeakable assault" by Assad's regime.

"Assad must halt his campaign of killing and crimes against his own people now. He must step aside and allow a democratic transition to proceed immediately," Obama said.

"The Syrian regime's policy of maintaining power by terrorizing its people only indicates its inherent weakness and inevitable collapse," Obama said. "Assad has no right to lead Syria, and has lost all legitimacy with his people and the internationalcommunity."

The violence in Homs sparked protests in several cities outside Syria.

British police used batons and riot shields to try to hold back protesters trying to storm the Syrian Embassy in London. "We want to close the embassy!" demonstrators shouted.

Police brought in sandbags and riot gear to regain control of the surging crowd, which lobbed objects at the embassy, situated near Buckingham Palace.

In all, anti-Assad demonstrators stormed at least five embassies in Europe and the Middle East.

The Asociated Press and Reuters contributed to this story.

More from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 13
Comment author avatarNoladude-2763286Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

WIsh the UN would do something about New Orleans. We're almost up to one murder a day now while our fool mayor dances in the street and leaves the running of the city to his raft of "assistant mayors'" who get the big bucks.

  • 29 votes
#1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:45 AM EST
Comment author avatarMICHAEL-595198Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

he must have been appointed by obama.

  • 25 votes
#1.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:51 AM EST
Comment author avatarKevin in TexasExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

What an intelligent thing to say Noladude-2763286! NOT!!!!!

And MICHAEL-595198, you obviously only like to post things that are worthless and idiotic!

As far as the article........lets all pray for the people of Syria and for a swift demise of the awful regime there, the Syrian leaders all deserve to die for what they are doing and have done!!!

  • 34 votes
#1.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:58 AM EST
Comment author avatarThe Devil-1138528Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Screw Syria. Let's get rid of the awful regime here first. Let's demand that Obama immediately step down for signing the NDAA and usurping authority to make American citizens disappear. Let's also demand that every Congressman regardless of party affiliation which voted for this law immediately resign and that them and Obama get the hell out of this country. Defend America against the enemies running our nation into the ground, not a bunch of Islamic thugs whining about how they get killed for attacking Syrian troops.

  • 47 votes
#1.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:16 AM EST

Assad wil fall regardless of what the UN does. It is unlikely at this point that the dynamic in Syria is going to change as the Syrian people have shown that they are willing to endure incredible punishment to see that he is deposed.

SI

  • 16 votes
#1.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:38 AM EST

Come on people write your congressman posting here does nothing but make you feel better because you said something. I bet you never even voted. so write them and do something useful.

  • 8 votes
#1.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:05 PM EST
bicfjDeleted

China and Russia are the biggest impediments to civilization and human justice.

At least China has an excuse of being the scum of the earth, using smaller countries' resources for personal gain with nothing in return.

Russia on the other hand is a puzzle...they have a progressive people but static government hell bent on anything to further their anti west propaganda...irrespective of human injustice...

  • 23 votes
#1.7 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:27 PM EST

Russia and China got it right. It would do us good to follow their lead for a change. We used to consider Russia interfering in other countries affairs very terrible. We have became that same hated country that Russia used to be.

The devil, you are right.

If you were paying close attention to the protests all over the middle east, only one country was protesting at a time. Probably the same protesters moving from country to country causing chaos. More then likely the protesters are backed by Iran.

  • 11 votes
#1.8 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:36 PM EST

@KevinT

Russia and China got it right. It would do us good to follow their lead for a change. We used to consider Russia interfering in other countries affairs very terrible. We have became that same hated country that Russia used to be.

Did you even read the article? "...the resolution endorsing an Arab League call for Bashar Assad to leave power."

It is the Arab League calling for Assad to leave power. Syria is a memeber of the Arab League. This UN resolution was just more meaningless drivel. Only in the UN can a vote be 13-2 and fail.

  • 7 votes
#1.9 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:12 PM EST

For whatever you think of Syria's current regime, it is a hundred times better than whatever government that will rise up to replace it if the current regime falls in the chaos. We've seen it happen in Libya. A nation of comparatively well off citizens under a strict government now have become, or at least on the road to become, a failed state.

  • 7 votes
#1.10 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:19 PM EST

Ursamajor-

Come on people write your congressman posting here does nothing but make you feel better because you said something. I bet you never even voted. so write them and do something useful.

Writing letters does nothing for most other than prompt a form letter from the office of your congressman, printed by an intern staffer. At least posting here, we can hope to educate fellow Americans on the need to stay out of the ME, eliminate the Federal Reserve that promotes the warfare state, and return to constitutionally limited government. These changes will take place by involvement in local government, state, and then federal.

  • 12 votes
#1.11 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:22 PM EST

This news is right on par with Bible prophesy. The last world war before Armageddon would be fought along the Euphrates River where 1/3 of mankind will be wiped out. Two countries along the Euphrates: Iraq is too weak and is conquered so the only country that COULD be fought over is Syria. With Russia, China, Nato and the US in a tug of war, I wonder which of these countries have the kind of weapons that could wipe out 1/3 of mankind (2.3 billion people).

Don't forget the other Bible prophecy that specifically says that Damascus would be in trouble in the evening and would be a heaping ruin by morning. Damascus is the oldest, continuously inhabited city on earth, it was never in ruins before, meaning this prophecy is still waiting to be fulfilled. What kind of weapon today could annihilate Damascus and turn it into ruins in a matter of hours? Could that have even been possible 2000 years ago when the prophecy was given?

For all you atheists who frequent this board, don't count out the Bible just yet!

  • 5 votes
#1.12 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:40 PM EST

William,

Count out the bible? Yeah, I'll count it out, thanks. Seems you count on it more than enough to make up for my lack of faith in prophesy. ;)

  • 3 votes
#1.13 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:54 PM EST

Man, I mean geeze. Does anyone, even MSNBC, know WHY China and Russia vetoed the resolution?????? i think that a little more information would be nice. At one time, a while ago, news organizations whould actually report full details to get a better grip on what the situation really was.

I miss that. A shame really.

  • 7 votes
#1.14 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:00 PM EST

Ursamajor...I rarely comment on articles but,you assume that none of us ever vote or write our congressmen.That my friend is simply not true.So please think before you make an ass-u-me.

  • 4 votes
#1.15 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:04 PM EST

Thanks William...I'm very into Bible prophecy ,but we'll never open the eyes of the blind on boards like these.I look forward to meeting you in about 100 years.Remember to keep your eye on the prize,and don't let the blinded lead you into frustration.

  • 2 votes
#1.16 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:13 PM EST

Ursamajor. I have a stack of form letters from various members of Congress in response to my writing to them. I get listened to better by my 1 year old nephew. Congress could care less about what we think. Best thing we could do right now is vote them all out and start over with term limits and elimination of the perks thy get.

As for Russia and China, we will never be at ease with either country as long as KGB Putin and the ChiComm are in power. You cannot compare apples to pears, and both countries are so different than the U.S. both politically and philosophically that it would take a major threat to the entire planet to bring us together. As for the Middle East, just stay the hell out and let them solve their own problems. Didn't Iraq and Afghanistan prove we don't know what we're doing??????

  • 7 votes
#1.17 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:23 PM EST

You will notice the war propaganda media machine will begin attacking Russia and China with all its ability. Whatever their reasons, I am grateful the Russians are standing up to the warmongers.

  • 2 votes
#1.18 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:48 PM EST

Dave I agree with everything but the last part.

Call it corporate greed, political maneuvering, war hawkishness, but we must take down these Islamic theocracies. 50 years ago it would be perfectly fine to let these animals do what they have been doing to themselves for centuries but not today.

There is nothing that would stop a Muslim from giving himself and his 5 buddies, a biological agent and start flying around the globe. Its not if its when.

On another topic I would be crap scared of what is going on in Pakistan. Pakistan already has nukes. If that government collapses we will have to get in their quick to secure those weapons.

The scariest thing on the planet is a person who follows a religion that awards suicide. Yesterday's bomb vest killing 100 will be tomorrow's biological weapon that kills 2 billion.

  • 1 vote
#1.19 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:01 PM EST

Okay, there is now absolutely NO need to keep pretending China and Russia are our friends. They are not. They have continually voted against censoring the most outrageous acts against freedom. Stop shopping at Walmart and funding China. Chinese good are pre-broken in the box, anyway. Don't buy that garbage. And, don't vote for anyone who coddles Russia. They are our enemies. Grow a pair for God's sake.

  • 2 votes
#1.20 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:13 PM EST

Thank you Russia and China for stopping another madness of the Imperialists interfering in the internal affairs of independent countries. After bombing Lybia & turned it into a useless country, they now want to go after Syria to protect you know who.

  • 2 votes
#1.21 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:42 PM EST

You have to seriously consider whether it makes sense to continue to support the UN, when two of its veto power Security Council members are China and Russia. neither of which will ever win the Champion of Human Rights Award (Ok, I made that up, but get the point). Neither Russia nor China have a problem with what Assad is doing because they have done the same thing themselves, and probably will again in the future, so they don't want to be called hypocrites. I may get suspended for this, but it will be worth it, those two countries are run by callous, dictatorial, unfeeling, and evil @!$%#s! (Oh my God, I actually typed that)! If we have a Nobel Peace Award, maybe we should also have a Nobel Tyrant Award (doesn't Putin look like he should have two horns and a pointed tail)?

  • 2 votes
#1.22 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:10 PM EST

Bob in Dallas

You will notice the war propaganda media machine will begin attacking Russia and China with all its ability. Whatever their reasons, I am grateful the Russians are standing up to the warmongers.

============

.......Oooooooooooooooohhhh Bob, do you recall how "goody two-shoes" Russia "helped out" in the country of Georgia not too far back, yes, a very peaceful, anti-warmongering nation they are, and unfortunately we are a nation of people with either very short or very selective memories.

  • 2 votes
#1.23 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:21 PM EST

I guess if Russia and China are for non-interference and Iran backs the Syrian governent then I think it is a no brainer, NATO should bomb the Syrian army. We don't know who will replace the Assad regime but if we help overthrow it then it certainally can't be worse off than just not doing anything. Assad will fall without us sooner or later but let's help the side of freedom, that is what we are suppose to be about.

  • 1 vote
#1.24 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:26 PM EST

I wish I could vote more than once for those of you who get it! I feel compasion for those who think this world is going to get better....and espesially those who think the government of the USA is blamless and just want to help us citizens live a better and peaceful life.

  • 1 vote
#1.25 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:35 PM EST

If America said the sky was blue, China and Russia would say its green. If we say yes, they say no. The reason China and Russia do not want to overthrow the government of Syria is because both countries would do exactly the same thing to their people if they were to rise up against the government this way. They are saving face with their own people. By voting no on this resolution, they are telling their own people what they will do if they should decide to try to overthrown their own government. No surprise there...

  • 1 vote
#1.26 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:56 PM EST

The above post by descrs brought to you by truth.

    #1.27 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 9:01 PM EST

    The majority of the posts above shows the lack of respect for life. I do care for us here in the US but, right now we aren't being killed and slaughtered by an evil dictator.

    None of us are perfect even given our current situation in this recession.
    We always have to put our priorities first and the main priority to me is to save innocent lives from being taken wherever it may be.

    Yes, I care about my individual rights and all of that but, those people over there need help right now.
    I don't hate China or Russia because the people in those nations are being forced to be under the rule of their rulers.

    I know the majority of Russians and Chinese are EMBARRASSED of their leaders and the Big Mistake that they are making.

    What their leaders don't understand is not only are they becoming less and less untouchable by the day but, decisions like this to allow murders to this degree will speed that process up to the 100th power!!!!

    There are many ways for KARMA to come in and ROCK YOUR WORLD!!!!

    they just opened PANDORA'S BOX for something new and very dangerous that may confront them sooner than later.

    Make the right choice not the spite choice.
    This will cause chaos in realm.

      #1.28 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:47 PM EST

      I see the same thing happening here in the USA in a few years when the people get sick and tired of the same old government crap I hope we can get this train back on its track's

        #1.29 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 8:20 AM EST
        Reply

        S--t happens. Keep it over there.

        • 22 votes
        #2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:47 AM EST
        Comment author avatarMICHAEL-595198Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        you know what gets me, Obama said he must step down. who the hell is this guy. you can't run this country of America, but you can run their lives over there. take care of America, this is what your problem is, you don;'t care about your own people, ( or do you ). Muslim.

        • 43 votes
        #2.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:50 AM EST
        Comment author avatarMymomdidnotraiseafoolExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Wow! Your tinfoil is strong today! Maybe you should also call him a Satanist, or a warlock? I guess the co-pay on your thorazine is more than you can afford.

        • 31 votes
        #2.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:57 AM EST
        Comment author avatarKevin in TexasExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        MICHAEL-595198.....you, sir, are a total moron! I don't care who you think you are but if you were a true American then you would respect and defend the President whether you like him or not! COUNTRY FIRST!! Party affiliations second. Most of our elected officials, on both sides of the aisle, are in for themselves and could care less about you or me or anyone else! We need to take back our country!!!!!If you think for one minute that the tea party is the answer then you are deranged, all they want to do is shut down the government which would make the United States fall apart! Is that what you want to see? Personally I think we live in the greatest nation on Earth and, if you disagree, then maybe you should move to say, Syria? I think you might like it better there!

        • 51 votes
        #2.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:05 AM EST
        Comment author avatarsanity rulesExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Michael, you must either be completely ignorant or are consciously choosing to be a selfish bigot. Do you think it's right to just stand by while a desperate dictator is using violence against his own people (women and children included) to hold onto power? I'm sick of people in this country sticking their head in the sand and pretending like America is the only country that matters on this planet. OH, and by the way, Obama has done quite a bit to take care of America...you just choose to be blind to that. Go ahead and spout your right-wing bigoted garbage about Obama being a Muslim and not being born in this country, etc., but realize that history will judge you and the rest of your type.

        • 44 votes
        #2.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:13 AM EST

        The reality is that the "rebels" are a small minority in Syria. That is why they have not been able to remove Assad from power despite almost a year of fighting. For the Arab League to demand his removal and the establishment of a democracy is the height of hypocrisy since many Arab League countries are not democracies themselves and often use force to crush rebellions. For the UN or anyone else for that matter to demand the Syria become a democracy is out of bounds. They are interfering in the internal politics of a sovereign nation and they have no right to do so. We are not talking about a leader who is committing mass genocide, we are talking about a sovereign government trying to put down a rebellion by a small minority of it's citizens. I personally do not like Assad or the way he rules, but that does not mean that the UN, NATO, or anyone else has any business getting involved. The Russians are against the UN action because of what happened in Libya. The Russians wet along with a no-fly zone to protect civilians. Then NATO under the banner of the UN went far beyond that mandate and started providing tactical air support for the rebels, striking at Gadhafi forces that were in no way threatening any civilians at the time. The NATO air campaign did not just protect civilians, the helped to overthrow Gadhafi. The Russians are basically saying they are not falling for that again. To put this in a context that people in the US can understand. What if there had been airplanes back in the 1860s and some organization like the UN had decided that the South had every right to their independence and to secede from the North during our own civil war. What if they then decided to "protect civilians" in the South from the North's military and started bombing North's military units. I know this sounds a little preposterous, but this is not much different from what the UN/NATO did in Libya. Sovereign nations have a right to settle their own internal political struggles without outside interference from the UN or anyone else so long as their is not mass genocide going on based on race, religion, etc.

        • 41 votes
        #2.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:14 AM EST

        Kevin whats your opinion of OWS?

        • 1 vote
        #2.6 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:16 AM EST

        Excellent response, South Dakota, North Dakota here, it seems we are the only area that thinks straight nowdays.

        • 12 votes
        #2.7 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:25 AM EST
        Comment author avatarD-MAN7Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Thank you sanity rules for post 2.4 that was the perfect reply to a complete idiot.

        • 9 votes
        #2.8 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:27 AM EST
        Comment author avatarhawk-2946882Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        MICHAEL-595198: Is just one of those dumb republicans who can't stand it that the economy is getting better under a black President and needs something to hate beside his self, he needs to get his head out of Glover Norquist butt because until he does he will pass for being black then he will see that he can't get into any more Ku Klux Klan or tea party meetings for free.

        • 17 votes
        #2.9 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:33 AM EST

        TexasZ....I think that the OWS folks have made their point. Now it's turning into a protest for folks who have nothing better to do but protest! If we really want change in this country we do it in the voting booth. This year we should ALL go into the booth and vote for the person that is NOT in office, FIRE THEM ALL!! I don't care what party you "think" is best because the one we have in office right now all SUCK!

        • 22 votes
        #2.10 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:40 AM EST

        MICHAEL-595198,

        If you would have been awake during your American History classes, you would know that the President of the United States isn't supposed to "run the country". WE, THE PEOPLE ARE supposed to run the country. Don't blame Obama. Don't blame Bush. WE, THE PEOPLE have allowed our attention to be drawn away from what is important.

        We watch "Dancing with the Stars" instead of C-Span. We do not hold our elected officials responsible, and we continue to listen to the same lies, campaign after campaign. We vote for people who "bring home the bacon" and then wonder why we keep losing freedoms. We scratch our heads when the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. It is our fault. And, it is too late. We have let our guard down too long, and allowed the petty amusements that have been provided for us to distract us from our duty. Politicians have always been the same. It doesn't matter how they're labeled or their party affiliation. They will continue to be liars and reprobates as long as we let them.

        There was a time when this country was on a higher plane. We had men and women in government who were truly sincere in their efforts. People who understood that in this country, we weren't supposed to be "led" by our officials. WE were supposed to lead them. It appears that we have collectively become much to lazy to be bothered with that.

        So, the next time you...ANY OF US...start complaining about how things are going in this country, remember it was US who chose to watch "Survivor" instead of doing our patriotic duty, and that is keeping ourselves educated about the issues and not voting selfishly. Now our SURVIVAL as a nation may very well hinge on the degree of our past laziness.

        - Edge

        • 51 votes
        #2.11 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:57 AM EST
        Comment author avatarJOE MAST..Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        TELL THE MEDIA TO TELL THE TRUTH!!!!! The overwhelming majority of Syrians are behind their own government. These "death squads" are CIA and MOSSAD controlled. I know, I lived there and saw what was going on. TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are fabricating stories and altering video. I was there and the truth. The next day the video was changed to tell a different story! TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!

        • 21 votes
        #2.12 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:04 PM EST

        @Clete-4217311 - Thanks, but actually the "SD" is for San Diego. Unlike most of CA, San Diego and Orange Counties tend to be more on the conservative side so people tend to have a little more common sense than the rest of the state in general.

        • 13 votes
        #2.13 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:24 PM EST

        Not one more drop of American blood in the middle east. Your on your own Islamists, deal with what you have sewn and allowed for centuries. A pathetic area of the world, good luck losers.

        • 6 votes
        #2.14 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:25 PM EST

        JD poster #2.5 - You are always the dedicated spin doctor for dictators across the globe. Your persistent defense of the indefensible is amazing, but at this point to be expected and now quite entertaining. Without folks like you defending the slaughter of the innocent with cute and clever moral equivalency arguments (just love the stuff about the US Civil War, just brilliant!), how could guys like Assad or Gadhafi or Mubarak or Iddi Amin, etc... find anyone to believe that they really want the best for their populations - when they are using the military and police forces to crush internal dissent in the name of national sovereignty?

        You provide a great service for the oppressors of the planet against those that are oppressed. You are quite harmless with your pedantry behind a computer keyboard, but your type of spin-logic permeates through the news media and the blogosphere.

        You can defend these thugs (this is what they are) all that you like. Most of us believe in a post-WWII world in which every attempt should be made by the UN to alleviate the unjust actions of aggressor nations via collective security codified in international law. You embrace a world order that has existed from through millennia in which the weak are dominated by the strong, and as such that is your law. We'll agree to disagree on this and all points. I'd be ashamed and humiliated to have any commonality of opinion with someone like you who embraces these bloody actions of brutal dictators in the name of justice as you envision it to be.

        • 11 votes
        #2.15 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:27 PM EST

        Edge, great statement. Also remember we are funding communism and communist governments by buying junk from china and vietnam. Over 58,000 Americans died in vietnam fighting against communism and now we have forgotten this and buy their crappy products. We, the people can change this, it's up to us.

        • 16 votes
        #2.16 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:32 PM EST

        This article is about Russia and China vetoing the resolution, most comments seem to be digressing into irrelavantcy.

        Russia and China have a monetary reason not to oppose Bashir, they supply the military.

        • 18 votes
        #2.17 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:35 PM EST

        Joe Mast.. you may well be correct. But as long as Assad restricts and otherwise forbids independent news to view and report, this is what you get. I'm sure the truth lies somewhere in between Assad being totally supported and universally hated, but you don't "lob" bombs into cities if you're after a few rebels... you're targeting whole populations. In other words, your post is unsupportable.

        JS... ha.. I thought the SD might be San Diego. Never would I think there was ANYTHING in common between San Diego and North Dakota. What support do you have that the rebellion is from just "a few"?

        • 6 votes
        #2.18 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:36 PM EST

        Rontron, I think Russia and China oppose any action of the U.N. based on actions against "the people".. they (China and Russia) might be next after Syria.

        • 12 votes
        #2.19 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:43 PM EST

        This vote will anger the neo-conservatives like William Kristol, Charles Krauthammer and Hillary Clinton.

        Russia and China have lousy human rights records themselves, but nonetheless voted correctly.

        • 7 votes
        #2.20 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:43 PM EST

        TELL THE MEDIA TO TELL THE TRUTH!!!!! The overwhelming majority of Syrians are behind their own government.

        Really, Joe, how do you know that? In a country that doesn't have free elections, or even free opinion polls, how can you know that the majority of Syrians are behind their government? Given all those exclamation marks in your message (which only weakens your credibility), I have to wonder how much the Syrian government is paying you for your propaganda.

        • 8 votes
        #2.21 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:55 PM EST

        @Anthony Seta

        The Christian and Jewish communities in Syria are dependent on Assad for protection. If the Assad government falls, they are doomed. Syria will become an Islamic State.

        You condemn Ghadafi as a thug, but have no problem with the new 'democracy' of Libya refusing to hand over power to the civilians torturing political opposition and beginning to 'ethnically cleanse' the black population of Libya.

        The Jews in Iraq are now driven out, and the Christian population in Iraq is quickly shrinking. How's that Iraqi democracy working out?

        Ghadafi was a moron, but what we unleashed in Libya is turning out to be far worse, the rebels have many links to Al Queda, where Ghadafi had none.

        • 20 votes
        #2.22 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:00 PM EST

        Good post Edge. So many of us have no idea how our own government works. Lack of education and greed has gotten us here. Blaming the black president won't solve anything.

        • 7 votes
        #2.23 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:03 PM EST

        Kevin in Texas, stated “ I don't care who you think you are but if you were a true American then you would respect and defend the President whether you like him or not!”

        Sounds like you enjoy dictatorship. I think you Sir should move to Syria.

        • 12 votes
        #2.24 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:06 PM EST

        Jungleboogie

        Did you just call Hillary Clinton a NEO- CONSERVATIVE!!!

        Wow, just wow. I mean, I understand that you may not like her but really, try to find a label that isn't the direct opposite of her usual stances.

        • 10 votes
        #2.25 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:09 PM EST

        Well China and Russia... its best to side with the people and their will not an individual leader. Leaders come and leaders go...the will and word of the massses (when not suppressed ...cough cough China) will ultimately prevail and you will ultimately be remembered for that.

        • 2 votes
        #2.26 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:11 PM EST

        Sd...

        ..."People in...Orange county...conservative...more common sense....blah, blah, blah..."

        Uh, huh.

        Opposite Day again in San Diego, I see.

        • 5 votes
        #2.27 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:21 PM EST

        Time for the Arabs to do their own political police work. They have a lot more money than we do and it is an Arab regime in their own back yard. Let them handle it and keep the USA out of it totally. We need to back away from the role as global policeman and spend our money building up our own country. We need to get out of the foreign aid business too, as all it does is promote corruption.

        • 6 votes
        #2.28 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:26 PM EST

        You condemn Ghadafi as a thug, but have no problem with the new 'democracy' of Libya refusing to hand over power to the civilians torturing political opposition and beginning to 'ethnically cleanse' the black population of Libya.

        Jungle .. did Anthony say that he had no problem with the current events in Libya? Its not an either-or thing. It is possible to deplore Ghadafi and deplore the subsequent events. This "if you favor this, you must oppose that" binary attitude is what's causing so many problems in our country right now.

        • 8 votes
        #2.29 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:37 PM EST

        Edge post 2.11: Great post man, your right on the money.

        softdude 2.28: Your absolutely right. We don't need to be over there. They have been fighting and killing themselves for years. If it was genocide, that would be a different story. But it's not.

          #2.30 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:53 PM EST

          Thank you JS in SD (#2.5) for your informative post. We always seem to have a knee jerk reaction to a story like this and it is enlightening to read posts like this and understand that there are many sides to every story. Thanks for pointing that out.

          • 2 votes
          #2.31 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:12 PM EST

          JS the problem with the N vs S and comparing it to Gadaffey Is Gen Lee did not kill a lot of civilians with an in an unannounced attack

          Some people need to be brought to Justice no matter what it takes.

          Bin Laden was one and the 9 kid nappers in Somali needed to be taken care of. Even if it meant invading the host country's sovereign air space

          In this case I think they should just kill each other off with out any help

          • 2 votes
          #2.32 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:12 PM EST

          America's politicians have yet to learn that you can't buy friends. If you look at history, our best friends are countries we whipped in a war ( England, Germany, Japan).

          The president is elected to do the will of the people, something the last two have not done ( Bush and Obama). If the voters wake up, all incumbents will be going home in Nov.. Term limits, a balanced budget, and fixing the healthcare law ( tort reform, limits on insurance costs, limits on healthcare costs.)

          Mark Twain said in 1902, " we have the best government money can buy."

          Democracy cannot survive as a form of government. As soon as the voters realize they can vote themselves perks from the national treasury, they will continue to vote for the politicians who promise the most perks. The government will eventually collapse under it's own fiscal mismanagement, and is always followed by a dictatorship.

          As of right now, the Democratic Party is promising the perks. See a pattern developing? The party in power when the collapse comes will have the best advantage of forming the dictatorship. And both parties know the fall is near.

          • 5 votes
          #2.33 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:17 PM EST

          nothing like a good old fashion rebuke'n...

            #2.34 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:18 PM EST

            Strange that the better comments get collapsed. MSN doesn't like when European Americans voice their concerns.

            • 5 votes
            #2.35 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:30 PM EST

            @SoftDude. Israel will never allow us to improve our foreign relations. It may actually make the U.S.A. better.

              #2.36 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:32 PM EST

              I would never expect Russia or China to side with the US and western nations. Russia and China hate us. Always have and always will. While Obama may have thought his magic would work with them, while he blamed Bush for poor relations, he now knows it doesn't matter who is in the WH the response from these two nations will always be the same. It would be nice to hear Obama admit he failed like Bush to "befriend" these two nations. Both countries would never support another country determining what goes on within their borders and thus they will not be advocating overthrowing other governments. I actually don't blame them in theory. The US and NATO have gone way over the line IMO.

              How many in Egypt really wanted Mubarak to go and did they all agree on the reasons? It seems now that the protesters amounted to about 10 percent of the population. The majority of the population NOW want the strict religious groups to take over and make life like it was before the government collapsed eliminating the corruption and thus making life better for the masses. Of course that won't happen with the choice they made, but it was their choice. The US should never have said a word about who should go or who they should elect. Ron Paul is right about the police role the US is playing and frankly escalating under Obama.

              Ditto with Libya. Russia and China know the US and NATO conspired to assassinate a world leader. Why not them next? If Mubarak hadn't stepped down, the US and NATO would have assassinated him as well.

              It always helps to step in the shoes of others that are on the opposite side of the issue.

              • 5 votes
              #2.37 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:33 PM EST

              SD, Assad isn't targeting a few rebels. He's indiscriminately shelling towns all over his country. People held peaceful protests and snipers shot people. He's killed thousands of people and they weren't rebels. They were people who lived in towns where people don't support him.

              • 3 votes
              #2.38 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:35 PM EST

              Syria wants the UN and security council to help...well Syria..you know who to blame now for not getting the help (Russia and China)!

              • 4 votes
              #2.39 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:36 PM EST

              @softdude:

              And how are we supposed to get out of the region? The war effort against Iran is heavy in the air, Israel wants a full blown war with Iran, Pakistan can't trust us, we will have to go back into Iraq with a civil war on the horizon (sadly), We're staying in Afghanistan for another year at least, and Tunisia is the only country so far to do justice to their revolution. And when I think foreign aid, I think not only of supplying Assad with weapons but sending food to the Horn of Africa. Pros and cons.

              • 1 vote
              #2.40 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:39 PM EST

              LMarcT.....Rontron, I think Russia and China oppose any action of the U.N. based on actions against "the people".. they (China and Russia) might be next after Syria.

              I believe that's the case also. They wouldn't ever want to get onboard with anything like calling a government that uses military might against their own people bad. The only reason to oppose the resolution is if they want that very same option for themselves.

              It certainly seems like the lines are being drawn and we should know who stands where soon.

              • 2 votes
              #2.41 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:44 PM EST

              well this dosen't surprised me at all. but one thing i will guarantee that all this regime

              have to go. and soooon. this dictators all they do is kill innocent people. that they have no right to speak for themself.. and for sure u,s,a will do somthing good for those dictator to be gone,{ die die die die die .....} for good.

              • 1 vote
              #2.42 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:54 PM EST

              I partially agree with sanity. America is blessed with liberty and most people thes days fail to realise that it did not come without a price. Our founding fathers risked their lives for independence but they were too small a group to take on britain alone. It was the french who aided the colonists in their revolution. Many people these days look at these countries that are revolting and say that that is their problem not america's. If the french had done the same during the american revolution would we still have won? If a country seeks independce it is our obligation to offer sid as needed for democracy should be shared by all.

              • 1 vote
              #2.43 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:04 PM EST

              this disgust me a big time. to know this dictators still havin more time to kill. innocents

              people. but i guaranty the u,s,a will do everything in there power to erase all this regime

              thing. it is enough. they all have to die,die, die, die for goooood. then everthing will be

              defferent. for good . we hope.

                #2.44 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:11 PM EST

                Kevin (2.3) I don't care who you think you are but if you were a true American then you would respect and defend the President whether you like him or not! COUNTRY FIRST!!

                That bit about backing the president meant something, when our government actually represented the citizens of our country. Especially now, since the president can call you a terrorist at his or any future presidents whim, and take care of you. But you paobably feel that it couldn't happen to you, right?

                • 3 votes
                #2.45 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:17 PM EST

                karla from vancouver

                this disgust me a big time. to know this dictators still havin more time to kill. innocents

                people. but i guaranty the u,s,a will do everything in there power to erase all this regime

                thing. it is enough. they all have to die,die, die, die for goooood. then everthing will be

                defferent. for good . we hope.

                Oh this is rich! You're willing to send MY husband, sons, and brothers but don't have the balls to send your own? You can f*ck right off lady, get YOUR Country to do something, leave mine out of it.

                • 6 votes
                #2.46 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:21 PM EST

                Do you think it's right to just stand by while a desperate dictator is using violence against his own people (women and children included) to hold onto power? I'm sick of people in this country sticking their head in the sand and pretending like America is the only country that matters on this planet.

                If a country seeks independce it is our obligation to offer sid as needed for democracy should be shared by all.

                Okay, folks -

                Feel free to open up your wallet and give the Syrians ALL of your money in "aid", or better yet - why don't you hop on the next plane and go fly over to Damascus, join the fight with these "rebels", and straighten EVERYTHING out over there??? GO AHEAD. Go give Assad a piece of your mind. You DON"T need our permission. And feel free to take your kid to fight along the front lines with you. Okay? THAT should make you feel better.

                • 5 votes
                #2.47 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:32 PM EST

                Since when did the US bow to pressures from China and the USSR? Maybe we need to blow up another Chinese Embassy, like Clinton did to show them we aren't screwing around? "Opps, did our bombs accidentally blow you up? My bad."

                • 1 vote
                #2.48 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:57 PM EST

                trust.2112 ..and there you have it! The #1 reason why we are so well liked around the world.

                  #2.49 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:02 PM EST

                  Since I am a registered Democrat, I tend to vote for the issues, not the men/women. Also, I was taught virtually from Kindergarten on up to check facts before I started spouting off. And finally, I was conditioned never to call people bad names. So, when I read these comments, regardless of political party, I tend to skip a comment when words like "idiot" and "moron" appear in the first line of type. Why? Because name-calling invariably describes the person using the names and I lose interest.

                  This issue itself, however, is something I feel strongly about. Not one person who thinks we should "establish" democracies in the Arab Middle East understands that what works for us is not going to work for them. The Islamic countries are Theocracies. Look it up.

                  That means that Allah rules and has ruled those Theocracies (with, of course, boundary and name differences) for a millennia and a half. Period. Via, of course, imams and their aides who interpret his will. As within Christianity and, yes, Judaism also, Islam has two major factions, the Sunnis and the Shi'ites who vehemently disagree with one another. We cannot and should not take sides... it is their business, not ours.

                  Some of you will get the point that this is 180 degrees from the democratic ideal (and btw, the United States is a Republic as structured; it's based on the Democratic philosophy, however, that each human being here has individual rights to equal opportunity).

                  Thus, I feel strongly that we have no right whatsoever to tell those folks over there that they should be "democratic." It is just none of our business... We DO NOT have the right to tell the rest of the world what to do.

                  We do have the right to defend ourselves if they try to tell us what to do. Does anyone here, at all, see the logic? We believe in equal rights. Are we going to give them the right to do to us what we think we have the right to do to them?

                  I don't.

                  And please don't give me the answer that we must save the world. Our definition of "saving" is not a world-wide philosophy. If we really believed in human rights, we would stop trying to change others with whom we do not agree.

                  Bottom line... It's time for us, the United States, to get the he** out of Dodge aka the Islamic Middle East, and pay attention to our own survival for a change.

                  • 8 votes
                  #2.50 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:08 PM EST

                  yakfitguy

                  No one is blaming the "Black President" because he is black. He is being blamed because he does not have the ability to do the job. And, there has been no evidence that he really wants to.

                  • 3 votes
                  #2.51 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:30 PM EST

                  "Assad must halt his campaign of killing and crimes against his own people now. He must step aside and allow a democratic transition to proceed immediately," Obama said.

                  The last two times he has said this, we ousted the leadership. Here we go again.....

                  Bottom line... It's time for us, the United States, to get the he** out of Dodge aka the Islamic Middle East, and pay attention to our own survival for a change.

                  Yes please

                  • 3 votes
                  #2.52 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:30 PM EST

                  @DSB

                  Yeah, I DO think Hillary Clinton is a Neo-Conservative.

                  Her platform wasn't much different than Romney's is now, and she hasn't met a war she didn't like.

                  Walks like a neo-conservative, talks like a neo-conservative, IS a neo-conservative.

                  And lest we forget, Krauthammer, Kristol, Coulter and the rest were oh-so-kind to her as compared to Obama in the Dem primaries.

                  • 2 votes
                  #2.53 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:31 PM EST

                  JS in SD

                  @Clete-4217311 - Thanks, but actually the "SD" is for San Diego. Unlike most of CA, San Diego and Orange Counties tend to be more on the conservative side so people tend to have a little more common sense than the rest of the state in general.

                  =======

                  .....Ah yes, a little self-possessed are we now, JS? San Diego, land of the Mercedes, face lifts and socially acceptable chemical indulgences ...epicenter of American Middle Class struggles? Let's see now: Palin, Bachmann, Ryan, Cantor, Beck, Limbaugh, all poster children of the "common sense" movement in this country. Right....nice try!

                  • 1 vote
                  #2.54 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 7:02 PM EST
                  haydayDeleted

                  Russia and China have done the right thing.

                  Let the resolutions against rulers of Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and some other ME Sunni barbaric, beastly, feudal, highly corrupt and bigoted rulers come first.

                  Assad is the leasts evil of all barbaric Sunni rulers!

                    #2.56 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 2:29 AM EST

                    @Rontron:

                    Your post #2.17 hit the nail on the head. Russia and China have their own military/industrial complexes that require markets for their goodies and Syria is, undoubtedly, one of their better customers.

                      #2.57 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:06 AM EST

                      @Rontron:

                      Your post #2.17 hit the nail on the head. Russia and China have their own military/industrial complexes that require markets for their goodies and Syria is, undoubtedly, one of their better customers. Plus, I have no doubt that Russia and China both get a nut busting Obama's chops.

                      • 1 vote
                      #2.58 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:07 AM EST

                      If you look at history, our best friends are countries we whipped in a war ( England, Germany, Japan).

                      We didn't "whip" England in the Revolution, and we pretty much got "whipped" by that same country in the War of 1812. As with the US in Vietnam, the political will to commit the resources needed for victory just wasn't there.

                      • 1 vote
                      #2.59 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 2:11 PM EST

                      Whoops! Wrong thread.

                        #2.60 - Thu Feb 9, 2012 10:43 AM EST
                        chester12Deleted
                        Reply
                        Comment author avatarMaster JosephExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                        Michael-595198....another covert Republican racist spewing his hate.

                        You people are so pathetic.

                        • 15 votes
                        Reply#3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 10:59 AM EST

                        He does a good job in shifting focus away from the total ineptitude that comprises the UN.

                        • 1 vote
                        #3.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:16 PM EST

                        Yeah, it's hard to believe there was such inaction over Darfur.

                        Yet the miniscule amount of deaths in Syria cause such outrage.

                        • 6 votes
                        #3.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:45 PM EST

                        Ah Master Joseph must be with the race police. I just watched a prime time show where they spouted the word cracker. I don't like it but the marxist mob is in full control.

                        • 3 votes
                        #3.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:38 PM EST

                        An observation about what's being posted on this blog:

                        Why is it that it seems that the liberals are for military action in Syria and the conservatives are against it?

                        Isn't it liberals who claim that conservatives are the warmongers?

                        • 2 votes
                        #3.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:50 PM EST

                        Ditto dat.

                        • 1 vote
                        #3.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:53 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Who funds these uprisings? Probably the same people (Central Bankers) who funded Hitler.

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:07 AM EST

                        I don't know who funds them, but as long as it is a Muslim on Muslim violence, it works for me. We should just watch from a safe distance.

                        • 13 votes
                        #4.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:00 PM EST

                        Okay, there is now absolutely NO need to keep pretending China and Russia are our friends. They are not. They have continually voted against censoring the most outrageous acts of freedom. Stop shopping at Walmart and funding China. Chinese good are pre-broken in the box, anyway. Don't buy that garbage. And, don't vote for anyone who coddles Russia. They are our enemies. Grow a pair for God's sake.

                          #4.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:41 PM EST

                          Okay, there is now absolutely NO need to keep pretending China and Russia are our friends. They are not. They have continually voted against censoring the most outrageous acts against freedom. Stop shopping at Walmart and funding China. Chinese good are pre-broken in the box, anyway. Don't buy that completely worthless garbage. It will poison your kids with their lead paint. And, don't vote for anyone who coddles mafia-run Russia. They are our enemies. Grow a pair for God's sake.

                            #4.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 5:14 PM EST

                            Now the US has no reason to hold Israel back from Iran. Yeah I can kind of see Russia's point of view that they do not want the US to set up shop in there back yard. However we did not set up shop in Lybia. Trust be told China's Military is for its citizens they have protest that are shut out by the media and the protest are huge. China needs it military for its own people. Russia has Putin protest going on right now. These protest are directed a Putin. The only way he will be able to stop the Russian people is to pull an Assad and kill about 6,000 of them are so. Who ever said stop buying Chinese products I am on board with you. Every CEO that sent jobs over seas and left the USA for more money should be ashamed. Nothing wrong with making money but how much money do you need. We have solders that fight for us (sacrifice) we have teachers that put up with our kids (sacrifice) we have sate workers that fix roads and take care of sick people and protect us (sacrifice). We are supposed to have people that hold office and sacrifice their time and families for us but instead they turn public office into some kind of self investment. (Greed) We have CEOs that uproot companies and send them to slave wage countries with no worker rights. (Greed) We have millionaires that are only for self and can a community dead on its knees and would not even plant a tree. (Greed) oops kind of got off topic. Yeah stop buying made in china. Sacrifice and look for made in AMERICA or some where close.

                              #4.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:57 PM EST

                              Saudis and their Arab League puppet rulers, oil companies and their lobbyists are funding these uprisings.

                              Rating agencies, Wall streets and some more add their bits.

                              They were behind Iraq wars (1991 and 2003) to raise oil prices and transfer five trillion dollars from oil importing nations to oil exporting nations from 2003 to 2011.

                              Tell me: what was the big deal if Saddam had occupied Kuwait or even Saudi Arabia?

                              Let us worry about our problems at home! Why worry about Syria, Iran and others?

                              Muslims have to kill somebody.

                              If they don't get infidels, they have to kill each other.

                              Is it not better if these killing experts kill each other?

                                #4.5 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 3:20 AM EST
                                chester12Deleted
                                Reply

                                Rise up !! Rise up !! oh wait, Iran and Russia are backing Assad ! Sit down,duck !! Gotta go now ! Dialtone ......................

                                • 5 votes
                                Reply#5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:12 AM EST

                                Maybe Assad should read up on the Boston Massacre ... and Lexington and Concord.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#6 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:14 AM EST

                                Bah, he has nothing to worry about. It's in the UN's hands now. If you ever want something to be not taken care of, put it in the UN's hands. Our sun will explode before they manage to decide on anything helpful.

                                • 2 votes
                                #6.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:05 PM EST

                                woodsyhowl... ummm are you aware that the fabled "Boston Massecre" of March 5, 1770, was rather limited on casualties?

                                Amid ongoing tense relations between the population and the soldiers, a mob formed around a British sentry, who was subjected to verbal abuse and harassment. He was eventually supported by a small company of troops, who were [also] subjected to verbal threats and thrown objects. They fired into the crowd, apparently without orders, instantly killing three people and wounding others. Two more people died later of wounds sustained in the incident.

                                There was a total of 5 people, four "Americans" (this was before the American Revolution so all of the people of the incident were still, technically, British), and one British sentry.

                                The word "massacre" is in the American history books. There is a saying "History is written by the victors." In English history book, it is called "The Boston Riots."

                                Interesting. btw hmm Merriam-Webster definition of the word "massacre":

                                mas·sa·cre/ˈmasikÉ™r/

                                Noun: An indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people: "the attack was described as a cold-blooded massacre".

                                Verb: Deliberately and violently kill (a large number of people).

                                It would seem there is a large difference of inference between the two different titles of the incident in the history books. We should keep that in mind while we read "news" articles written by our reporters, and those of other countries, even our allies.

                                • 2 votes
                                #6.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:26 PM EST
                                Reply

                                Aww let em go Michael, they can only defend their King and Savior for 10 more months! And then this will all be just a bad dream...

                                • 11 votes
                                Reply#7 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:14 AM EST

                                The bad dream was having a limp like Bush Jr in office for 8 years and he left a total mess That President Obama had to fix even without the help of congress and those hitler want to be republicans, whats the matter did some one piss in you and michael's pepsi this morning?

                                • 7 votes
                                #7.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:05 PM EST

                                Bush may have been a total buffoon but what did you expect him to do in the wake of 9/11 and Katrina? He had TWO catastrophes to deal with, y'all seem to forget that he too had a crap hand dealt to him and he did what he thought was best, hind sight is always 20/20.

                                • 9 votes
                                #7.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:08 PM EST

                                ..."Bush may have been a total buffoon but what did you expect him to do in the wake of 9/11 and Katrina? He had TWO catastrophes to deal with, y'all seem to forget that he too had a crap hand dealt to him and he did what he thought was best, hind sight is always 20/20".....

                                Wow. Bush had forewarning of ALL his forth-coming "crap hands"..

                                He didn't need Hindsite. He had PDBs!

                                He absolutely KNEW of New Orlean's potential for catastrophe and he did THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what he should have done!

                                Please stop apologizing for that complete buffoon.

                                • 4 votes
                                #7.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:29 PM EST

                                It certainly looks as if the Bush administration...probably orchestrated by his friendly Dick...knew that 9/11/01 was going to happen.

                                It seems as if they allowed a tragedy because they needed one to solidify the nation, and go forward with their own preconceived personal agenda to invade Iraq, which his dad was smart enough not to do during the Kuwait thing.

                                That was a bunch of bad people in the White House, with a moron as leader.

                                • 3 votes
                                #7.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:00 PM EST

                                The fact that New Orleans spent the billions of dollars given to them for their levee infrastructure got spent on other things was the President's fault how?

                                I'm not apologizing for him, I'm putting into perspective how I have to hear how President Obama was dealt a raw hand and he's doing what he thinks is best to "fix it" it's the same darn thing.

                                The "Kuwait thing" was Desert Storm and if he would've finished it then we wouldn't have had to go later.

                                • 5 votes
                                #7.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:21 PM EST

                                ...but we didn't have to go later.

                                The Bush administration wanted to invade Iraq!

                                "Mission accomplished....", remember???

                                • 2 votes
                                #7.6 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:26 PM EST

                                HEY SHUT YOUR YAP ! What was that black ass of a Mayor doing while everyone was looting? What about all of those Buses he could have used to evacuate all of the old folks? he was busy giving interviews and had his thumbs up his ass while the banks of the Missisip were overflowing. Give me a FN break! WHERE WAS JESSE JERKSON, AND SHARPIE SHARPTON AND ALL OF THE OTHER BlACK LEADERS WHO ALWAYS HAVE THEIR YAPS OPEN WHEN THERE IS A WHiTE GUY TO BLAME, INCLUDING THE THEN SEN. OBUMMA !I GUESS THEY WERE ALL LEADING FROM BEHIND! Once in while try to call a Spade a Spade , if you have the balls !

                                • 6 votes
                                #7.7 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:29 PM EST

                                While I don't agree with or like everything that Bush did, you can't say that he knew all of this was going to happen without blameing most of the Presidents before him.

                                Katrina - The government recommended repairs and upgrades to the flood defense system first back in the 1980's and there was a report done under the Clinton administration stating that the system would collapse if a catagory three or higher were to hit with the storm surge aimed straight for N.O.. The Clinton administration ignored this just as every other administration did because the money was deemed to be needed in the plain states with the annual flooding of the Mississippi. The Corp of Engineeres worked on the systems north of N.O. because these were systems that they knew would fail every year and not N.O. which would only fail if certain conditions happened. The real tragedy was on the part of State and Local governments who choose to wait until the last second to order evacuation and failed to utilize all forms of mass transit at their disposal. Does everyone remember the Parked flooded busses after Katrina. The federal government mobilized and staged outside of the danger zone prior to Katrina's strike on the US. They advised the Local and State governments to take proper steps. The Local and State governments failed to heed their warning or accept their help until it was too late. While no amount of response could have helped prevent the damage caused by the storm, cooperation by Local, State and Federal agencies could have eleminated almost all loss of life and would have prevented the looting of the city in the aftermath.

                                9/11 - Bush received the same update that Clinton had received. There was no new information given to Bush that Clinton hadn't seen. Clinton did no more than Bush prior to the attacks. It's easy to say he should have done more but you can't say that without pointing the blame at Clinton as well. For that matter, some of the signs were also present durring the First Bush administration.

                                Something else that everyone should keep in mind is that for the first two terms of Obama's administration he had complete control of both houses of congress, not just a majority. Obama and Pelosi could have passed through anything they wanted to. If you control 60% of the vote the Republicans would have been powerless to stop it without someone crossing over from the other side. If you watched, the Democrats wasted an opportunity that had not been seen in quite some time and probably never will be seen again. They fought with themselves instead of getting things done. What did they get done? They passed some of the biggest spending bills ever in US history and passed a health care bill that a vast majority of Americans did not want. Talk about egos.

                                • 6 votes
                                #7.8 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:34 PM EST

                                Sorry, Should have been first two years of Obama's administration, Not first two terms.

                                • 3 votes
                                #7.9 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:47 PM EST

                                He absolutely KNEW of New Orlean's potential for catastrophe and he did THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what he should have done!

                                Actually, the Army Corps of Engineers warned about New Orleans's potential for catastrophe decades ago and nothing was done by any administration.

                                • 6 votes
                                #7.10 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:03 PM EST

                                Thank you Oom, it was the only thing I was going to correct four! on it's actually been since 1926 not the 1980s but the rest was spot on.

                                Yes I remember "Mission Accomplished" and um THAT particular mission WAS accomplished, Yes we DID have to go back later, I know all y'all can think about is the "lack" of WMD but to those that were there finding the mass graves was way worse.

                                • 3 votes
                                #7.11 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:28 PM EST

                                Russia and China veto the Rebuke of Syria's President Assad.

                                My, that's is a big surprise---

                                Russia is still the USSR/China/Communist Red China. These 2 countries do plenty of their own slaughtering to their own people. It is just more "quiet" in Russia and China..

                                What has changed?----Iran is in cahoots with these 2 countries.

                                Where's Nikita Khrushchev?---he needs to pound his shoe at the UN again.

                                • 4 votes
                                #7.12 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:53 PM EST

                                @ four! - How dare you bring facts to this debate. Everyone knows Obama is a God and Bush is a devil. Case closed. Your facts only server to ruin a perfectly good delusion. ;)

                                • 4 votes
                                #7.13 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:01 PM EST
                                Reply

                                Syria deserves the right of self-determination. Let Syrians determine the type of government they want to live under. Ten years, thousands of lives, and almost a trillion dollars trying to encourage a democratic government in Iraq should have taught us a couple of things: It is next to impossible to maintain an unpopular government in the middle east and democracy doesn't appear to be the workable choice of governing there.

                                Given enough time Syrians will come up with the form of government best suited to its people! They should be given the opportunity to work it out for themselves without outside interference!

                                • 12 votes
                                Reply#8 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:17 AM EST

                                Syria deserves the right of self-determination. Let Syrians determine the type of government they want to live under.

                                How can the Syrian people do that when they're slaughtered for voicing opinions in opposition to their dictator? Only democracy can do what you want.

                                • 3 votes
                                #8.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:57 PM EST

                                @Barry-NJ

                                Yeah democracy. Like the ones in Libya and Iraq? Sure worked out well for them.

                                • 13 votes
                                #8.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:04 PM EST

                                We need to stay the hell out of it. That way when it all goes to hell in a hand basket, we won't be the ones standing there holding the damn hand basket.

                                • 7 votes
                                #8.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:23 PM EST

                                Jungle ... obviously, those countries don't have democracy. OK, you tell me what form of government will allow the people of Syria to choose the type of government that they want, as Ken proposes, and to change it when they want?

                                • 3 votes
                                #8.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:39 PM EST

                                So we vote the republicans out and the democrats in to get us out of the mid-east. ten years later we are still fighting over there. democracy? The media had no problem getting us into and out of vietnam, at their pleasure, to support take-over of the countries money supply by Central Banks- same reason we are in the mid-east now. It'll be over when the countries money is firmly in the hands of the Central Banks, including the Fed Reserve..

                                • 3 votes
                                #8.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:14 PM EST

                                So we vote the republicans out and the democrats in to get us out of the mid-east.

                                When was getting out of the middle east part of the election platform of either party? As long as the middle east provides a substantial portion of the world's oil, we'll be involved. We have no other choice.

                                • 1 vote
                                #8.6 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 2:14 PM EST
                                Reply

                                No gets that Syria and Bashear and his people are fighting for their very survival against a previously held in check Islamic insurgency. The Alawites of which Bashear and a sad minority of the country belong will be eliminated by the Shia if they don't prevail and hold onto a dictatorial style of control. If the Islamic insurgency prevails there will be another blood bath and the country will devolve into another Somalia. There is no winning in this region of the world as it is pathologically psychotic. The one positive thing is that the Alawites are far more intelligent and evolved then the rest of Islam. The Shia wasn't Syria to be just like most Islamic countries, controlled by mosques and mullahs.

                                • 4 votes
                                Reply#9 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:25 AM EST

                                We have had a lot of uprisings from the Arab Spring movement and backed some of them for their freedoms.

                                I was curious of their new freedoms. In 1941 President Roosevelt encouraged the Freedom House to be oganized.

                                http://www.freedomhouse.org

                                They monitor the freedom of every country by various methods. Their staff is made up of every political party and religion so they are fair.

                                As of 2012 the results of our involvements are not impressive. Iraq is not free, Afghanistan is not free, Egypt is not free, Libya is not free, Bahrain is not free.

                                Actually the only country that shows freedom in the region according to their report is Israel, who many here would love to annihilate so they can be equally unfree as their surrounding countries are rated is my guess. We call it equality.

                                Why are we getting involved with Syria if the end result is the other countries from the Arab Spring has not lead to freedom for their people?

                                • 8 votes
                                Reply#10 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:27 AM EST

                                I agree I want to see Israel enjoying the multi-racial Empire lifestyle they created for the rest of us. It would do them alot of good to wake up to the nightmare Europeans are just barely able to endure.

                                • 1 vote
                                #10.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:45 PM EST

                                Israel created cultural and racial diversity within a society?

                                I will put that with Palestinians are like the American Indian, and Iran would never attacks its neighbors.

                                • 1 vote
                                #10.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 4:07 PM EST
                                Reply

                                The same Syrians calling for NATO's help will be the first one's planting IED's to kill them and get them out. One thug to be replaced by another unless they are ready to stop being ruled by theocracy like all of the idiots in the Middle East. Unless, of course, the ones that have oil and worship money and say they are muslim.

                                • 6 votes
                                Reply#11 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:32 AM EST

                                johnny; don't know where your downer attitude comes from but whenever we get asked for help, we usually don't respond until it's nearly too late like in Libya. The trick is to get rid of the dictator, then get out and let the chips fall where they may. Islam is now at the same point Catholics were 500 years ago; a great upheaval is happening amongst them world-wide.

                                  #11.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:31 PM EST
                                  Reply

                                  how about we mind our own bussiness and quit being the police of the world. we need to quit nit picking wars with other countries. we are bankrupt as it is. we need to get these globalist traitors out of washington.

                                  • 9 votes
                                  Reply#12 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:35 AM EST

                                  How can you be so heartless and deny your masters rights to continue to make a dollar beyond all human decency? Until we enact a real armed revaluation I think we will have to accept the Marxist-Liberal Empire for some time. One day people may long again for the republic that worked well for it's founding citizens without caving in to special interest groups and endless trumped up "wrongs of the past" or "Sins of the fathers" scenarios.

                                    #12.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:54 PM EST
                                    Reply

                                    The UN rebuke caught on tape by undercover journalist:

                                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSo0duY7-9s

                                      Reply#13 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:36 AM EST

                                      I wonder what the Russian ministers plan was, after all, Russia must take care of their allies and if they have a plan that doesn't hurt anyone in countries like the EU and the U.S. then I say lets hear it, let them solve their friends problems.

                                      • 2 votes
                                      Reply#14 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:39 AM EST

                                      @ everyone who thinks The President has done nothing for this country well he brought thousands of jobs back to our shores in the form of machining and manufacturing which has got (myself included) hundreds of people job opportunity's that we never would have had if it wasn't for him and did I forget to mention all the military victories we have had under his leadership. If you don't believe me just Google Osama bin laden or the war in Iraq or lack of one now @JS in SD your comment makes a lot of sense

                                        Reply#15 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:43 AM EST

                                        Could he bring a few jobs to Mississippi, please? I really don't want to have to move just to get a manufacturing job....Not to mention that MS has one of the highest unemployment rate in the Union.

                                        In the last 6 months I've applied to 25 different places without a call back. I didn't even set my standards that high. I applied at McDonalds FFS. You know you're @!$%#ed when you don't get a call back from McDonalds.

                                        Secondly, The Iraq war was planned to be extended into 2012. The only reason it wasn't was because the Iraqi government wouldn't allow immunity for troops stationed in Iraq. When Obama learned of this, he decided to use it as a publicity stunt for his way of ending the Iraq war. Obama didn't end the war. Iraqi Government did.

                                        • 8 votes
                                        #15.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:09 PM EST

                                        Well gee MFudski if it's so well and good why the hell is my W2 30 THOUSAND dollars less than it was last time?

                                        I'm in the same boat as you Mike I actually landed a job for all of 3 months (they neglected to tell me when they hired me that it was only part time temporary) and your 3rd paragraph is spot on.

                                        • 5 votes
                                        #15.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:16 PM EST

                                        Mississippi doesn't get to complain about lack of jobs.

                                        They voted for the president that's responsible for their loss - G.W. Bush.

                                        And as for the Obama comparison to Captain Scantino, Obama is more like Captain Scully. He was given a doomed ship that was headed in a downward spiral and he brought it in for a safe landing.

                                        Have a nice day.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #15.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:35 PM EST

                                        shut yer yap,

                                        Bwahahahahahahahhaha. Sniff, pffft! Ahahahahahahahaha.

                                        Thanks for the laugh.

                                        • 3 votes
                                        #15.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:20 PM EST

                                        Any manufacturing jobs coming back today are due to the costs in foreign countries reaching a par with the USA, like happened in japan, and is happening in Mexico. The CEO of Intel says it costs 1 billion dollars more to build a semiconductor plant in the USA than anywhere else. Due to regulations, and taxes. labor costs are less than 10% of the extra cost. Companies are also learning the Chinese and other foreign workers are 1/4 as productive as American workers.

                                        • 3 votes
                                        #15.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:43 PM EST
                                        Reply

                                        How many more have to die until an international response occurs? I believe it's not our responsibility and China, Russia and others need to handle this crisis. America shouldn't be the United Global States of America anymore and should take care of its own business at home. No more friggin' occupations of ungrateful countries.

                                        Russia needs to quit supplying arms and step in and help the commoners achieve peace, not supply their p.o.s government with the means to kill innocent civilians.

                                        • 5 votes
                                        Reply#16 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:44 AM EST

                                        Russia needs to quit supplying arms and step in and help the commoners achieve peace, not supply their p.o.s government with the means to kill innocent civilians.

                                        Well, the Russians aren't going to do that unless the US takes a leading role in making them change their behavior. That doesn't mean that we have to send troops everywhere, but it does mean that we have to have a vigorous foreign policy. We can't withdraw from the world and expect that somehow everything will magically turn out OK.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #16.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:01 PM EST

                                        Barry-NJ: Withdrawing from the world.... How about becoming less like the Roman Empire just before its fall? Hell, I only posses a 2yr. degree, and I admit my ideas are just that... My heart always goes out to those who are downtrodden and weak. Americans are already experiencing the effects of a 100% fabricated democracy and are beginning to realize it's has always been about the United Corporations of America and their collaborated will for the people.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #16.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:22 PM EST

                                        Fed Up ... it is quite possible to be active in the world without taking direct military action. Our military and economic strengths and, most important, our incredible soft power makes us the only credible leader for change. If we want a better world, we have to stay involved. There is no more, if there ever was, Fortress America that could ignore what was going on in the world safe in the knowledge that it was protected by two oceans.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #16.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:43 PM EST

                                        Barry....I generally agree with your post, but our 'soft power' took some mighty serious damage under Bush/Cheney. I think The Obama administration is being quite masterful to achieve what it is. I don't believe we could muster up much of a 'coalition of the willing' after the last call to arms for the mysterious WMD. I think that damage is part of the reason we are having difficulty in dealing with Iran. Our allies just don't want another expedition with us, but really don't want to come right out and say so.

                                        Crying wolf once too often was bad for us. Being perceived as too cozy with Israel isn't helping us either. This blah blah blah about Israel planning an imminent attack on Iran's nuclear facilities might just be giving other countries the willy's about getting too involved with another foray in the region. I'm betting they are asking themselves what the real motivation is.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #16.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:20 PM EST

                                        johnny -

                                        I think our 'soft power' took more of a hit when Clinton gutted our military. Why else do you think we have to use mercenaries now?

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #16.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:36 PM EST

                                        Tammy ... out soft power has little to do with the size of our military. Regardless of what Clinton did, our military was still sufficient to project our power anywhere in the world.

                                        Johnnyt is right. Our soft power took a beating under Bush/Cheney, but not just because of the failure to find WMD in Iraq. It sustained severe damage because we betrayed the very underpinnings our society. Our soft power comes from our culture (including clothing, music, TV, movies, etc...), our economic power and our ideals. The words of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and even the famous poem on the Statue of Liberty carry powerful moral authority around the world. But, we've betrayed so many of those ideals with the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison, waterboarding, our insistence on holding people for years without charge or trial and so much more.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #16.6 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 2:21 PM EST
                                        Reply

                                        I have as much concern for their loss of 200 citizens, by their own military, as they had for us when we lost over 3000 when the trade towers came down.

                                        • 4 votes
                                        Reply#17 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:53 AM EST

                                        Oh, great.

                                        Now SYRIA is responsible for 911? I thought it was Saddam, all this time...

                                        Have a nice day.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #17.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:37 PM EST
                                        Reply

                                        3000 civilians dead in Afghanistan per year - under our gentle military occupation. Unprecedented torture in Libya by those installed by us - as reported by IRC and Medici Sans Frontiers. Ongoing fighting there. 40000 estimated dead. Riots in Egypt with hundreds injured and dead. People missing/arrested/killed in Bahrain. Several hundred thousand killed in Iraq courtesy of our invasion and subsequent events. More than 20000 killed per year in South Africa courtesy of 'simple'crime and violence. All tragic and sad - and certainly quite a bit was avoidable. However and that given, seems to me somewhat hypocritical of UN to be 'appalled' by what is happening in Syria. If there was a consistent application of principle or belief one could have faith in the good will and intent of those concerned - however selective application exposes something else. That said, what is happening in Syria is sad and unfortunate - but not in substantive terms any different in terms of casualties to what is and has gone around them with and without our involvement.

                                        • 4 votes
                                        Reply#18 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:56 AM EST

                                        Unprecedented torture in Libya by those installed by us....

                                        Unprecedented? Yeah, right. Ghadafi was such a humanitarian. Torture of regime opponents was widespread during his decades in power.

                                          #18.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:45 PM EST

                                          Barry -NJ. I am not exonerating Ghaddafi, but merely repeating statements by the International Red Cross and so on ( people who do have direct experience ). Other than that merely putting situation into a common contextual environment relative to the consequences of our involvement ( or not ) and the surrounds. Then the use of emotive terms in regards Syria just looks rather selective ( particularly as the death toll there is to the lower end of what seems to be 'acceptable' ) - much as we saw in the lead-up to the Iraq war when to be frank, we were propagandized by our own government to take us into war. My opinion is that all unnecessary death of civilians, wherever, should be highlight and roundly condemned regardless of those responsible.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #18.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:39 PM EST
                                          Reply

                                          Here's the deal, fellow Americans, liberals and conservatives alike, just watch what happens. No sense in yelling at each other. We're all Americans, we're all in this together, we're all equally hated by our little bearded friends in the Middle East. Anyone want to take bets on the current regime being replaced by a 6th century, totalitarian, woman-stoning, acid-throwing, gay-hanging, bomb-blowing, boy-raping, livestock-humping, body-lashing, limb-lopping, AK-toting, blood-lust ideology of body pieces? Oh, right, HOW could THAAAAAT happen? OK, whiny multicultural equivocators (dems AND repubs and other assorted useful idiots), go for my jugular. Tell us all that it's a religion of peace and that all their behavior is OK because it's their cuuultuuure and we shouldn't judge and they should have freedom of religion toooooooo ... one more time. And, PLEASE, write with that special nasal whine.

                                          • 8 votes
                                          Reply#19 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:57 AM EST

                                          There are no religions of peace. Religions, the books, are just the owners manuals for each society's war/slave system. None is better or worse than the other. They are all the same and from the same source. Men.

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #19.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:08 PM EST

                                          Your own bigotry is no better than theirs.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #19.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:12 PM EST

                                          Prophetslayer....yep!

                                          As Christopher Hitchens wrote: "religions poison everything".

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #19.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:31 PM EST

                                          Are you sure it's not liberalism?

                                          • 4 votes
                                          #19.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:56 PM EST
                                          Reply

                                          Why isn't anyone telling the truth about what is really happening in Syria? Why isn't the media not taking sides against the Syrian people, who overwhelmingly are behind their government? Why isn't the media telling about the "DEATH SQUADS" that are CIA and MOSSAD controlled doing the murdering? TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!

                                          • 4 votes
                                          Reply#20 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:58 AM EST

                                          Where is your proof? Provide proof of what you say, somehow you know more than others... and then the media will be compelled to report.

                                          If on the other hand you are fabricating ideas based solely on conspiracy theories within the gray matter encased within your skull, then you are on your own. No sense in asking the media to report about non-existent beliefs that you have conjured up. Just do your own blogging. There must a at least a few dozen other folks across the globe that will embrace your madness. Just look at the idiotic posters on this site as example and perhaps some hope on your part that you'll be taken seriously by someone out there. Cheers mate!

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #20.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:14 PM EST

                                          Joe Mast... You are such a Troll, you aren't even slightly convincing.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #20.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:16 PM EST

                                          I know that the Syrian gov wants everyone t believe this is a small group of insurgents. And it may well be. One way to prove it! Hold an honest election. Let unbiased UN observers in and give them free reign to monitor. The outcome would then silence everyone. IF the people truly back their government, that is....

                                            #20.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:19 PM EST

                                            Joe Mast said he was there, and as an eye witness, he should have some credibility. I, too, have been to Syria, several times in the years since Bashar Al Asad became president. I have family there and speak with them on a regular basis. They have homes in Homs in the neighborhoods where there is trouble. I also know a few hundred people with family in other parts of Syria. The eyewitness accounts I have heard are consistent with what Joe and others I know are saying - that some early demonstrations were held to start trouble by having "demonstrators" fire weapons out into the streets while holding the demonstrations, that snipers were on roofs in Homs firing at people walking down the streets and that these are the people the army was firing at during the "peaceful demonstrations." I also have first hand knowledge that Al Asad has been a very popular president during his tenure and I believe that the majority of people do support him. But then, I understand Arabic, and so when I see video on YouTube, I can understand what the people are saying. Does the foreign press? Why did Al Asad ban foreign press in Syria, because from the beginning, the press printed stories that were absolute LIES. The press has been agitating the world against the Syrian government, even though it is fighting a group of Islamists that would take the country from a secular government where all citizens share equal rights: muslims, christians, alawites, men, women and children into a country where women and children have no rights and even men lose many of their rights. For instance, being a secular government, no one in Syria is forced to practice Islam. There is NO shari'a law and so women wear what they want, drive cars, go to schools, including college, work outside the home if they want. Everyone can choose to drink or smoke or swear if they want. What kind of personal freedom do women in Saudi Arabia have? They can't leave the house without a male relative, they must completely cover themselves in public, they can't drive, and EVERYONE in the country is forbidden to drink, etc. Does it not seem even a little dubious that the US partners in this world media campaign against Syria are Saudi Arabia and Qatar, where the leaders' families have been in power for over 80 years and 95 years, respectively. And they want to overthrow a "dictator" who has held power for 11 years?

                                            • 8 votes
                                            #20.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:30 PM EST

                                            Anti-Semite troll at that! You don't need truth in Joe's world. You keep repeating the same falsehoods over and over again like a twisted montra and some will believe it.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #20.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:05 PM EST

                                            Leila,

                                            Nice way to bolster your spin. Pay no attention to this hand over here and look at what I have in this one. Typical of Syria as well. Since the 80's they have played both sides of terrorism. It's like being a arsonist and the fire department.

                                            I do agree with your Saudi statement.

                                              #20.6 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:14 PM EST

                                              dsb: do you know why this supposed "impartial election monitored by UN" idea will fail? It's because the election result will be declared "unfair" until the result is what US and it's gangs want. There will be "irregularities", or "frauds" as long as Asad is still president after the election. When the losers revolt because they can't take a lose, and go on a looting, killing, burning rampage, it will be declared "peaceful demonstration". And when security forces are forced to take them down to restore peace, it will be declared a "massacre".

                                              Same thing happens over and over again all over the world in regions where US and it's gangs want to get their hands in. The so called "free press" of the west plays a willing accomplice, twisting, and in many cases, manufacture blatant lies, to twist western public opinions. Ever seen the movie "wag the dog"? That describes the techniques.

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #20.7 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:29 PM EST

                                              @ LiarsInPolitics. Breaking out the big guns with the greatest debate ender ever the dreaded dun dun dun. Anti-Semite. But I'm sorry to tell you this Europeans are not cowing to anti-this that or "racist" anymore. It was used so much it lost it's effect. As for job stability just head north where alien loyalties scareicly exist.

                                                #20.8 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:59 PM EST

                                                Joe Mast. The sheep have been brainwashed to much. And the things you are typing while true causes a knee jerk reaction in their thought process. I don't know why some people can see above the true corruption despite a lifetime of brain washing and others are doomed to never wake up. For me. I learned to stop hating my European race as I learned I have nothing to be guilty or ashamed of and it has made me a better soul and human being. I challenge lies even when it is "racist" or anti-Semitic to do so. I am not afraid anymore. To combat against anti-semite use phrases like Rothchile-politics or Rothchild Banking. The man is so corrupted that not many can shore up against it being typed that way. As for racist-that usualy means anti-European all one can do is to continue to be proud of their racial extended family.

                                                • 2 votes
                                                #20.9 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:03 PM EST

                                                Joe mast is right on on this...NATO and the Cia are behind the unrest.....Assad enjoys popular support among most Syrians....this is an attempt by Nato for Regime change and to try and further Isolate Iran...

                                                Joe...good to see someone else is paying attention...

                                                  #20.10 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:24 PM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  Send troops and wellfare money to help like we do to all the other countries. We can barrow it from China.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  Reply#21 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:59 AM EST

                                                  the terrorists are in washington those are the ones to be worried about not some boogiemen in caves. obama can now detain anyone without trial.

                                                  • 7 votes
                                                  Reply#22 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 11:59 AM EST

                                                  China and Russia do not care about humanity. Let em kill each other off is their idea...might be the best way.

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  Reply#23 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:04 PM EST

                                                  I have no problem with China as they are not on our shores. I wish I could warn them though. Do not buy our debt. The globalist are not going to pay them back.

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #23.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 3:09 PM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  Let's hope the Arabs remember who their friends really are...when all this over, do they really want to throw their lot with China and Russia who approve of killing civilians?

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  Reply#24 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:04 PM EST

                                                  Nope, they will blame America

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #24.1 - Sun Feb 5, 2012 6:59 AM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  I repeat.

                                                  Come on people write your congressman posting here does nothing but make you feel better because you said something. I bet you never even voted. so write them and do something useful.

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  Reply#25 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:06 PM EST

                                                  Only if you promise to do the same. Deal?

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #25.1 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 12:27 PM EST

                                                  Won’t waste my time contacting congress, at least here you can get a response.

                                                  • 4 votes
                                                  #25.2 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:17 PM EST

                                                  OK. I do vote. Do you?

                                                    #25.3 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:22 PM EST

                                                    Our Congress people have exactly what to do with how China and Russia vote?

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #25.4 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:31 PM EST

                                                    Ursamajor finds himself instructing others in their civic duties. What a shame Ursa must do that since the rest of us are so dumb. Aloof and above it all eh, Ursa? I have a question. What are you doing here? Why don't you find a news article that is of interest to you and comment there? Let the rest of us do as we please and we won't bother you. Fair enough?

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #25.5 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:35 PM EST

                                                    congress could give a $&!^ what we think

                                                    • 3 votes
                                                    #25.6 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 1:58 PM EST

                                                    Contacted my congressman about where the privateley owned Fed Reserve gets the money it lends to the government, thus owning and controlling it, along with their propaganda arm the media.

                                                    Totally ignored, obviously.

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #25.7 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:20 PM EST

                                                    Objective, that sucks, I know what my Congressman thinks of the Federal Reserve ( I may not live in his district but still consider him to be my congressman) my actual one will be voted out ASAP, hopefully you'll be able to do the same.

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #25.8 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 2:35 PM EST

                                                    why am i going to waste my time writing to some globalist elitist traitor. they don't care about us.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #25.9 - Sat Feb 4, 2012 6:59 PM EST
                                                    chester12Deleted
                                                    Reply
                                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 13
                                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.