Updated at 12:45 p.m., ET: WASHINGTON -- A 30,000-pound bunker buster bomb designed to smash through some 200 feet of concrete before exploding is a "great weapon" that could be used by U.S. forces in a clash with Iran over its nuclear program, an Air Force general said on Thursday.
Israel stepped in line, asking the United States for the advanced bombs and refueling planes that could aid an Israeli strike on Tehran's underground nuclear sites, an Israeli official told Reuters on Thursday.
"Such a request was made" around the time of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington this week, the official said, confirming media reports.
But the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the issue, played down as "unrealistic" reports that the United States would condition supplying the hardware on Israel promising not to attack Iran this year.
Netanyahu told President Barack Obama at a White House meeting on Monday that Israel had not yet decided on military action against Iran, sources close to the talks said.
'A great weapon'
Serious talk of the buster bomb surfaced on Thursday after a high-raking military official described the bomb, designed to smash through some 200 feet of concrete before exploding, as a "great weapon” and could be used by U.S. forces in a clash with Tehran over its nuclear program.
Lieutenant General Herbert Carlisle, Air Force deputy chief of staff for operations, said the massive ordnance penetrator, which the military began receiving only last year, is part of the U.S. arsenal available for strikes against countries like Iran, which has some buried nuclear facilities.
"The massive ordnance penetrator is a great weapon. We are continuing to improve that. It has great capability now and we are continuing to make it better. It is part of our arsenal and it will be a potential if we need it in that kind of scenario," Carlisle told a conference on U.S. defense programs.
The Pentagon has begun working on military options if sanctions and diplomacy fail to prevent Tehran from building a nuclear weapon.
World powers to Iran: Open Parchin military site to IAEA inspectors
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told the National Journal in an interview on Thursday that planning had been going on "for a long time."
Major powers are increasingly concerned about Iran's nuclear enrichment program, which they view as an attempt to build an atomic weapon. But Tehran says it is meant for peaceful energy production.
Israel holding off?
Israel is worried about potential for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. Netanyahu said during his Washington visit that time was running out for diplomacy and sanctions.
Nevertheless, Netanyahu reportedly is willing to wait at least a few weeks to let sanctions work.
"I am not standing with a stopwatch in hand. It is not a matter days or weeks, but also not a matter of years. Everybody understands this," Netanyahu told an news program in Israel according to Britain's Telegraph newspaper.
NBC News' Richard Engel and the Carnegie Endowment's Karim Sadjadpour join Morning Joe to discuss why the most important thing for the current Iranian regime is "to stay in power" and why the Ahmadinejad regime is not a suicidal regime.
"We would be happy if this thing is resolved peacefully, if Iran decides to stop its nuclear program," he said according to the Telegraph. "To stop it, to dismantle its facility in Qom, and to stop enriching uranium. I will be most happy, I think all Israel's citizens will also be happy."
Panetta, who has said diplomacy and sanctions should be given more time, told the National Journal he did not think Israel had decided whether to order a high-risk raid on Iran's nuclear sites.
He said the United States was committed to preventing Iran from acquiring atomic weapons and would have a greater impact than Israel if it decided force was necessary.
"If they decided to do it there's no question that it would have an impact, but I think it's also clear that if the United States did it we would have a hell of a bigger impact," Panetta said.
The tough rhetoric from the Pentagon came despite President Barack Obama's effort this week to tamp down "loose talk" and "bluster" about possible military action, saying there was still an opportunity for diplomacy.
More from msnbc.com and NBC News:
- Mansions, jets: Libya battles to seize $20 billion in Gadhafi assets
- Dogs sniff out key anti-terror role at London Olympics
- Report: Saudi woman dies after campus protest
- Evangelical Christians tighten embrace of Israel
- How did 'KONY 2012' video spread so fast?
- Tsunami survivors: Starting a family, facing an uncertain future
- An Egyptian career woman? Soon it could be rare
Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world
Reuters and msnbc.com staff contributed to this report.


Who will start dropping bunker buster bombs on the most illegal nuclear weapon program in the world, in Israel? Israel has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and their nuclear program is the most illegal in the world. Israel officials have threatened to use the “Samson Option” against nations that have supported Israel in the recent past, including France and Germany. No nation on earth is as violent and dangerous as the fanatical racists that run Israel.
Iam with you on that it is time to take out israel the jews have no clame to the land and oh yea when are we going to take out the jew nuclear threat
Most Iranians, especially the young people, genuinely like Americans. It's their leaders, stuck in the 14th Century, and their minions, the Revolutionary Guards, who don't like us. However, if we start bombing...blockbuster or not...the entire population, steeped in 2,500 years of Persian pride, will turn against us. Diplomacy is hard painstaking work, and it's so slow. However, it is in America's best interest. The eventual payoff will be an Iran without nuclear weapons capability and no American dead. Remember all the US lives lost in Iraq, the beheadings, and all the other craziness. For that, fanatics got into power anyway and now control Iraq... Let's not make the same mistake in Iran.
One KEY difference between Iran with nukes and Israel with nukes: Iran has vowed to wipe another country off the face of the Earth and Israel has not.
the terrorist jew state needs to be destroyed
No, they haven't.
Traditionally, nuclear weapons have made a country more stable rather than less. Maybe it is because the stakes are high...
North Korea has them, and are even crazier then Iran. Plus they hate the South even more then Iran hates Israel, and yet they don't use their weapons. And the reason is MAD and power. The purpose of getting the bomb is not to use it, but as a posturing tool.
Iran knows if they ever were to nuke Israel, they would be blown to oblivion. This is the biggest deterrent to nuclear usage.
I'm not saying that we should be happy about them getting the bomb; but to use more then diplomatic means to dissuade them from this course of action is foolhardy.
Iran's populace is generally far more moderate than their government, and are pretty darn educated. We can work with the populace right now, but nothing galvanizes public opinion behind radicals better than being attacked (See 9/11 for example).
Rottweiler, who's your Daddy? Adolf Hitler? Herman Goering? Goebels?
I wouldn't put Pakistan in that category, but point taken. I don't think anyone seriously thinks Iran would actually detonate a nuclear device in anything but self-defense, but I can easily see a scenario where they pass on dirty bombs to their terrorist friends. I would think that would be the primary concern for the world.
I happen to agree with Obama that diplomacy over brute force should be the first measure of the operation. We don't need another war in the Middle East.
AG99, Pakistan has not been acting like a friend recently, but generally has above average political and civil stability for its region. It is also doing relatively well economically considering it's place as a developing country.
As for dirty bombs (conventional explosives surrounded by nuclear material intended to spread when detonated), this is currently whithin their ability to produce (much less pure uranium is required for this kind of weapon) and secondly, it would be easily traceable to Iran.
I'm not saying it isn't a major concern, but I'm not willing to go to war over it. I'm as against bombing them as I was for attacking Iraq, and for similar reasons (note, I was for attacking Afghanistan, but it should have been an aerial campaign and had no boots on the ground except for special ops strike teams).
Would it? Even with the lack of inspections in some areas? I hope so. That's reassuring to know.
Sorry MyGirl, but you can't reason with unreasonable people.
And, English Dude, are you getting high on Neville Chamberlain? Mr. Churchill says: 'You are an embarrassment to a proud English man'.
AG99, nuclear material is very easy to trace based upon chemical features. Here is some information related to the topic:
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2002/10-17-722025.shtml
Typically, very small quantities of material can be used to determine where the original material was mined, processing conditions, and facility of processing due to contaminants, and chemical profile.
JrSub, Eng refers to Engineer, not Englishman. Secondly, comparing Iran to WWII Germany is ridiculous. Their political structure, capabilities, and rival capabilities are not even remotely comparable.
Hello folks, our country is broke and weary of war. If Israel wants to start a war, let them finish it alone. The elite are ratcheting up the rhetoric and the warmonger sheeple are getting sucked in to the propaganda. Let’s take an objective look at the Iran situation. Ask yourself, what would happen if Iran attacked an oil refinery in the US? Of course we would go into Iran and bomb their country. Well, we recently bombed an Iranian oil refinery and they didn’t retaliate. We issued sanctions on their oil and export industries and they didn’t retaliate. Israel is killing their scientists and they didn’t retaliate. Why is that?
While appearing vulnerable they took control of the most sophisticated drone on the planet downloaded and deciphered the encrypted information and have our Military intelligence (I know it’s an oxymoron) people worried that top secret information has been compromised.
Do you believe that the Iranian’s have the capability to bring down a state of the art drone and have it land where they want it to and down load and decipher complex encrypted code? It appears that Iran has been getting help and lots of it from a very sophisticated source or sources. The US already declared war on Iran by issuing sanctions and covertly bombing them but they don’t dare overtly go in because it would jeopardize China’s oil flow, piss off Russia, Turkey and the local Arab countries. This would also force Iraq to support Iran. We got kicked out of Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is trying to get us to leave their country. The Middle East is kicking us out which means we are running out of staging areas and NATO support for an attack on Iran. The US tried to concoct fraudulent excuses to stir up public support to go into Iran. There was the laughable assassination ruse of the Mexican drug cartel and the more unbelievable law suit stating Iran was part of 9/11. There were also claims that Iran attacked Iraq, etc. The elite are running out of false flags. Iran is out foxing the US because they have the world divided and we can’t command an organized response. The UN Security Council voted against the US a few weeks ago. China and Russia have gone on record that if Iran is attacked they would support Iran. The world is getting fed up and bored with our Imperialism and the elite who orchestrate war.
We have been fighting urban wars of attrition for over 10 years now and we are broke, our allies are broke. We have spent close to 3 Trillion dollars in Afghanistan and Iraq. We can’t afford another expensive protracted war a half a world away and the US citizens are sick of war. There is 85% support for Ron Paul amongst our troops because they are sick of war and he’s promised to end the wars. The lengthy wars have depleted our manpower, equipment, and our political capital.
Recently the Census Department of the Federal Government reported that “50% of the nation’s population were living below the poverty line”. Our nation’s wealth has been exhausted by war so that we could secure profits for the banking, oil, and Military/Industrial cartels. We never saw a dime of it and never will because the 1% elite feel they have a Divine Right at our expense. You know their motto, privatize profits and socialize losses. They truly can’t squeeze much more from the peasantry but they will try.
Our government has been trying to get Iran to do something stupid so that we can attack them but they won’t do it. Iran isn’t Iraq or Afghanistan. They haven’t done anything, aren’t weak and they aren’t bluffing. They are asserting their right as a sovereign nation and have the support of some very powerful countries. If we attack Iran, the war will be at our doorstep and then we will see how brave you who espouse war respond. When you live by the sword, you die by the sword.
Shandril: Yes they have, do your homework
Rottweiler: Who cares who has rights to that land, either way it isn't ours. Your ideology is no different from those that want to fight FOR Israel
We shouldn't be fighting over there at all. Period. I never signed up to go fight someone else's battle. What do we gain here? Nothing. So what if they build a bomb? Are we scared that they will throw it in a backpack and sneak it in? Not going to happen. Like the comment above says, they know what will happen if they use it. Yea yea, they are all Mooslime fanatics and say they will blow Israel off the map. And? Again, not our problem. We are not the world police people. If you are going to argue that we should be the Barney Phife of the world, then YOU go enlist and do the fighting yourself. Oh that's right, not your thing huh?
there will never be peace in the middle east. these people are not capable of maintaining peace. they are savages who have completely no regards for women or other human beings. they are not human.
People who keep repeating that "Iran has vowed to wipe another country off the map", need to understand that Iran is only vowing it, while Israel is actually doing it. They are wiping Palestine off the map.
Any day Israel is more dangerous to the peace of this world then any other country.
I will say that things as serious as this shouldn't be public opinion sway, as it seems most of the public is ill informed at best. Re-read post 1.15 above; it really makes sense and is spot on in many ways.
If Iran were to get nuke bombs, material for such, I wouldn't sweat it for a moment. They are surrouned by nations with nukes; living in the US most don't consider it, but think about living in a nation where you're surrounded by outsiders (the USA and Russia) that like to play stratego in your backyard and you're completely vulnerable to their mercies as you're seriously under armed pertaining to your own defense. Because of MAD Iran certainly wouldn't use weapons developed, but does provide comfort instead of 'let's hope'. Have always told my children; you've no idea how deep, how important or meaningfull the words trust and friend really are.
A nuclear armed Iran will ensure stability and not the opposite; any that think others have more right to nuclear arms are asking for more than would be acceptable to themselves if in similar situation, and don't really understand trust amongst nations and precautions against broken trust (again, stratego in the ME betwixt the US and Russia).
Get over it already, and yes.... Iran has said that Israel needs to go, but they certainly didn't mean the way some are thinking. Israel isn't a toddler, not vulnerable and uneducated to make Her own decisions; what She decides should be on Her, not us. Further buying into the war machine propagated will only further America's decline, as distractions keep us from what's important..... work here instead of outsourcing to 3rd world wage earners to the benefit of corporo-government while we suffer, keeping GLB in effect instead re-instating Glass Steagall (needed 10 years ago) while we suffer, keeping the left and right divide alive and well instead of utilizing moderates and common sense (afterall, so many are distracted by the BS government continually perpetrates), and yes... think of all other things that can be added to the list.
If any think that 'global warming' means that as long as you outsource your jobs to those that pollute worse to save a dime, you obviously are as heavily invested in corporate as are our 'supposed' representatives and don't understand the term 'global'. Don't see those that promote Iran as the next Iraq any differently; it is, indeed, the red herring that is keeping us, Americans, from uniting and moving forward WITH government operating smoothly, quietly, and minimally in the background.
Ron Paul needs our votes 2012.
@Trustverify
Umm... no. Iran isn't "out foxing" anyone. The UN security council voted for sanctions, not against them, with a final count of 12 to 2 (Brazil, Turkey) and 1 abstention (Lebanon). NATO and the EU voted for an oil embargo. So... where or when did the security council vote against the US with respect to Iran? I think you've confused the vote on intervention in Syria with Iran (during which vote both China and Russia voted against any military intervention-- all the while Russia is sending Assad munitions...) The world is pretty well resolved to slow and/or stop Iran's nuclear program and there has been general consensus that this is the case. Now, that's a far cry from anyone recommending military strikes-- but that has not come up for a vote. Please note that in the vote that did occur, that Russia and China each voted for sanctions against Iran-- so obviously there is some concern even on their end for a nuclear Iran.
I agree with a lot of the rest of your statements. The US is indeed war weary.
rottweilerman's daddy isn't anyone like hitler......it's more like his inbred illegitimate brother.
If you are TRACING the aftermath of a dirty bomb, don't you think it is just a bit LATE?
Then, I think someone said something to the effect of: They couldn't sneak one of those into the US!
Oh! Yeah! And the Mexican Cartels can't smuggle in TONS of drugs, undetected, EVERY DAY?
What kind of a DREAM WORLD are you people living in???
What does it say that they have had nukes for awhile and not used them?
Iran on the other hand...no such track record.
Oh oh, I get it now. See, these neocons must have that nifty pre-crime unit from Minority Report. So now, they have all the answers beforehand, and can arrest people (or invade nations) BEFORE those people or nations actually do something wrong, and it's not a violation of human rights (that thing that says there should be some sort of actual thought-out judgement before a punishment) because they have their Jebus Machine... I mean, precrime unit.
Seriously, though. Nobody seems to be talking to the analysts. Many analysts are saying that Iran would never use the bomb, nor would it allow the bomb to fall into terrorist hands. Rather, they fear Iran would use the bomb to intimidate its neighbors. With neighbors like India, Pakistan, Israel, and Russia with nukes, and even India without nukes would be a game-changer, Iran would have a hell of a long way to go in order to intimidate neighbors. And everyone who's actually studied this knows that Iran would only use this for self-protection. So, I'll go with the experts who actually make sense - no war. Offer them political incentives to stop the refining, but don't go to war over it.
Pretty simple what this The United States needs, peace, I may not have been around for the last 60 years, but I know for a fact we haven't actually been at peace since World War 2... Iran isn't anywhere an existential threat as many like to believe. And the costs for either side to initiate hostilities is far beyond the benefits. They aren't suicidal, and they aren't by any means anywhere close to Nazi Germany, not politically, economically, not militarily. They don't have their people entirely fooled and they don't have them unified regardless. They are a nation being pounced on by the world and pushed into developing the ability to create Nuclear weapons as a last resort and a deterrence. Sure Saudi Arabia will most likely purchase their own deterrence from Pakistan but the plan is a deterrence, not a means to go haywire. You can bet your bottom dollar that Iran will not allow a single one to get out to terrorist factions. Its quite simple, its such a tightly monitored weapon inside and out that you'll know who let what go and when, so why would a nation attempting to survive contradict itself with suicide? If you say its because they said they'd wipe out Israel, its just words... And no offense but when you cry wolf for the past 45 years and somewhat bully the rest of the Middle east to maintain your "defense" your no doubt gonna get a very bad vibe from people there. This isn't the board game risk, you can't just play all your pieces against one player with no losses, there will always be losses. Lay off the hostilities and calm down, when we can get that much, then we can push for proliferation.
Phuck Israel....why should the US 'give' the bombs and re-fueling tankers to them. The Jews stole the nuclear bomb secrets from the US, killed many Americans with the attack on the USS Liberty, and tried to sink and then denied it and tried to blame it on the Arabs....with Jews as your friends you need no enemies.
Sure let the US pour tens or hundreds of millions of dollars a year, all their scientific knowledge into developing this technology and 'give' it to Israel so they can then steal the technology and copy the bombs that American spent all the money to develop. This is the Jew mentality, steal everything they can and if you don't give it to them they yell 'anti-semitism'....well I say phuck them, if they want to go to war with Iran they can do it themselves. I also love how Odumbo will make it a condition not to use the bombs on Iran this year as to not upset his chances in the upcoming election....such a humanitarian the piece of sh!t is
@Truth2know You have the countries backwards.
Remember when Iraq had WMD's? Wait, they didn't? Oh ya, that's right IT WAS PROPAGANDA BY THE US GOVERNMENT SO WE COULD INVADE.
THIS IS THE SAME GOD DAMN THING.
Delusional and dangerous
That sums up many of these posts today.
Iran is a wild card Nation - they should not have a nuke or the potential to make one - period. It is a fact that they fund terrorist organizations around the world and have been doing so since Bin Laden was jumping from one nut to the other...Anyone who believes that an Iran with nuclear weapon capabilities will balance power in the mid east needs to start making amends with their higher power.
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last - Winston Churchill
"Iran knows if they ever were to nuke Israel, they would be blown to oblivion. This is the biggest deterrent to nuclear usage."
The problem is that Iran is a potential suicide state, and really wouldn't care, as long as they took out a large number of Jews and all of the Jewish holy places in Israel.
"The Russian military considers that outbreak of a conflict with Iran could spread through the Middle East with a domino effect and unpredictable consequences, with the possibility of becoming even an international confrontation.
"The West reacts with bellicosity and more unilateral sanctions against the Persian state each time it refers to new programs to develop the atomic sphere and to reiterate its peaceful character". ~ Pravda, Feb. 17, 2012
@Truth2know You have the countries backwards.
Uh...wrong. Chemical weapons that killed 100,000 plus Kurds and outfitted to SCUD missles by Iraq are WMDs genius.
Bend the term how you like Riley, that wasn't the mission no matter your perspective.
Beam me up Scotty. There is no sign of intelligent life here!
All of the Neo's are out today; the Neo-cons, the neo-Nazis, even a few very childish neonatals.
Alas!
Any clash with Iran will either see the use of some pretty sophisticated 'new' technology, or our pitiful excuse for a potus will bow to the Iranians and allow them to continue making nuclear weapons -- with an appology and some US cash for reparations. I sincerely hope that if we join a war against Iran, it will be a real war and not some 'police action' like Viet Nam or Afghanistan!
You have no idea about Iran's nuclear material. I would bet the government knows volumes more than your D.A. does about Iran so why are you blowin your insane ideas about our Pres?
Tell your stupid republican talking point propaganda to all of the dead terrorist leaders, Mathuin. I would bet a day of Romney's pay that when our president says he is going to use military force to stop Iran's nuke progress, they are genuinely worried.
...mathuin - I sincerely hope, should war with Iran break out, that you are "right up front" with an M-4 and an 80 lb ruck. You just jump right in there "Rambo"!
so you are of course going to be first on the front line personaly i will not die for any jew terrorist. Ibelive iran already has nuclear wepons and if atacked they will turn the jews to dust
"I sincerely hope that if we join a war against Iran"
Then I am sure you sincerely are not concerned about the national debt, right? Are you also sincerely willing to sign up for the military and put your life on the line in such a costly effort? Or are you just another right-wing chicken hawk who loves promoting wars (that we can't afford) as long as someone other than you or your family are fighting them?
Notice the anti-Israel crowd is out in force. Now, it's interesting how they never mention Iran's leadership and their determination to destroy Israel. Why is that? Guess the posters bashing Israel have a stake in seeing the caliphate dominant. Guess they are all for the destruction of women's rights which is what will happen when the Middle East becomes one huge Islamist domination.
As to a war with Iran, interesting how Obama claimed credit for bringing home the troops from Iraq while industriously rattling sabers at Iran at the same time. Guess we can't have a moment in history where Americans aren't engaged in some war or two. Endless wars, that's the ticket.
Rottweilerman: Your bias against Israel is noted. What religion are you a proponent of? Most Islamic countries have stated on many, many occasions that they want Israel destroyed, in fact, it was the Egyptians and a few other anti-jewish countries who started the six day war, the little war where Israel handed them their butts on a plate. Seems all those Arab countries wanted the destruction of Israel and lined up to start the hostilities. It wasn't Israel who started that, however, they did finish it....much to the chagrin of the countries who had figured they could easily destroy her.
There are wars and there are wars. While I never understood the purpose of going into Iraq, other than the psychological need of an insecure president trying to show his Daddy that he is his own man, Iran is a very different ball game.
Ahmadinajad's and the mullah's regime is as irrational as the nazi regime. They have layed out their dogma and there is no reason not to take it at facevalue -- convert the infidels if necessary by force and kill all the jews.
Am repeating this because Redherring's inflammatory comments were collapsed...taking our replies with him.
Most Iranians, especially the young people, genuinely like Americans. It's their leaders, stuck in the 14th Century, and their minions, the Revolutionary Guards, who don't like us. However, if we start bombing...blockbuster or not...the entire population, steeped in 2,500 years of Persian pride, will turn against us. Diplomacy is hard painstaking work, and it's so slow. However, it is in America's best interest. The eventual payoff will be an Iran without nuclear weapons capability and no American dead. Remember all the US lives lost in Iraq, the beheadings, and all the other craziness. For that, fanatics got into power anyway and now control Iraq... Let's not make the same mistake in Iran.
I am with you Ol Doc.
Too many people waving the flag, wanting war, but are they willing to serve, or see their children serve?
Our military has been in a constant state of war for a decade. It is a small, all-volunteer military. Troops and equipment wear out quickly. Many troops make the ultimate sacrifice. People need to understand that, before calling for more war--especially those who have never served, or decline to serve.
r-l-h
MSG, USA (Ret)
Mathuin, as somebody who is a 20 year veteran of service in both Vietnam and the 1st Gulf War, judging by your comments I can safely rest assured that you have never served in the military and if you did it was never in a combat zone. To those like me who have served and sacrificed in combat, we do not refer to our having served in "police actions". When in a combat situation and you are scared to death when bullets are flying and your friends are being wounded and dying all around you, I can assure you it is WAR and it is quite real! So save yourself the embarrassment of making foolish comments like that unless you have walked in the shoes that I and my comrades, brothers and sisters in arms from whatever service did! And as a combat vet, I can assure you that the last thing I want is to see and/or participate in another war. Two was far too many but that does not mean that I am not extremely proud of my service. I and others took an oath to..."uphold and defend the Constitution of The United States from all enemies foreign and domestic". I take that oath as seriously today as I did all those years ago and would do so in a heartbeat if I had to and was called upon to do so. I may not like or agree with the reasons, but I would still do so. I love my country that much! My apologies to others for the rambling. I just have a slight intolerance for ignorance on some others part.
Yea, because he won't bother to get approval from Congress first ... LOL ... sorry couldn't resist.
...our pitiful excuse for a potus will bow to the Iranians and allow them to continue making nuclear weapons...
mathuin:
While I'm not exactly a huge Obama fan, I don't think what we are seeing on the surface is necessarily what is truly going on. Behind the scenes, I believe that the calculation is that a showdown with Iran is more or less inevitible and that the only question is whether that showdown occurs sooner rather than later. In Isreal it was reported that our military leaders had approached Netanyahu with details about a weapons package that they felt the Israelis would need to carry out a successful strike against Iran's nuclear capability. This package included "bunker buster" bombs as well as tankers for the refueling of Israeli jets which are currently incapable of making the round-trip to Iran. Other reports have it that the US is frantically working to increase the capability of the "bunker buster" bombs as the Iranians have moved some of their facilities out of reach of the existing ones. If these reports are true, than in my opinion, the approach that the Obama administration has adopted is the correct one. It allows time for the sanctions to work, which obviously is the ideal, but also allows time for the US and Israel to better prepare should a military option be deemed necessary.
SI
Hey Mathuin since you are obviously so enthusiastic and “patriotic”, why don't you pack you and your family up and head to the nearest recruiting station so that you can witness up close and personal the new fireworks the Military Industrial Complex has designed to extend peace and democracy to foreign countries that just won’t hand their oil, resources and sovereignty to us. We can help institute the Patriot Act and National Defense Authorization Act in their countries so that they will really know what freedom is all about. After all, the term peace is synonymous with the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA when they hear we are coming to provide them freedom. Maybe we can incorporate them too. And Vietnam has worked out so well for us that they are begging us to come back and put up military bases there.
If you noticed we are probably the most popular country around the world, you know, the shining beacon on the hill. Instead of joining the army, why don't you put on an American flag shirt and visit those lucky countries our military has visited. You could be our ambassador and walk around any middle eastern country and watch the throngs of people who will come up and shower you with hugs and flowers for all the good will our country has bestowed upon them. You may go deaf from hearing them enthusiastically chant, USA, USA, USA. Makes you proud to be an American doesn’t it?
WE cannot allow this to happen. The traitor Obama (and parts of his administration) is finally going to be impeached for his actions, and prosecuted!
Obama's impending impeachment for "Under the terms of Jones’ resolution, both Panetta and Obama would be subject to impeachment for abusing their power and violating the Constitution in disregarding the authority of Congress and placing a foreign power above its jurisdiction" should be being put on front pages everywhere?
All of the military and law enforcement who has been supporting this traitor in destroying our freedoms and our country going to start keeping your Oath to support and defend the US Constitution now? He sent our Military; our brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, friends to put their lives on the line for and at the United Nations orders.
Did you know that the UN "has supreme authority over OUR US military because the traitor Obama said so? You took an Oath to 'Support and Defend the US Constitution" which is the USA. Obama the traitor took an Oath to "Preserve, Protect, and Defend the US Constitution". He went against the USA and gave power over it to the UN. Still going to support the sob?
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s testimony asserting that the United Nations and NATO have supreme authority over the actions of the United States military. During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing yesterday, Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey brazenly admitted that their authority comes not from the U.S. Constitution, but that the United States is subservient to and takes its marching orders from the United Nations and NATO, international bodies over which the American people have no democratic influence.
Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO ... The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would be to seek international permission...
Obama (and his administration) itself has routinely cited the authority of the United Nations over our US military; and Panetta exalted the power of international bodies over the US legislative branch, the US Constitution.
“I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat,” Sessions said. “I don’t believe it’s close to being correct. They provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution.”
Under the terms of Jones’ resolution, both Panetta and Obama would be subject to impeachment for abusing their power and violating the Constitution in disregarding the authority of Congress and placing a foreign power above its jurisdiction.
As I have been continually saying Obama, and his administration are domestic enemies of the USA working against and destroying our nation, our Constitution, our way of life from within our government. He put more domestic enemies within the judicial branch while he has been in office. Everyone who voted for the NDAA, assisted and did not protest the Patriot ACT extension, warrantless searches, warrantless and illegal spying on us, warrantless tracking of American citizens, the TSA's actions against Americans are all domestic enemies working for the interests of foreign entities.
It is past time for their arrests, time for us to replace them NOW. Then hold them until we replace the domestic enemies within the judicial branch and then prosecute them all!
Or are those who were following Obama going to let the United Nations step in and take over OUR nation? Enforce their laws here?
Ed-Navdoc, Thank you for serving.
I am sorry if the traitor Obama has caused many in our military to have been through the same as you at the Orders of the United Nations.
Thankfully Obama's illegal, unAmerican, and unconstitutional actions are resulting in impeachment. But his, and his administrations traitorous actions had better also result in prosecution. He, and his administration has lied continuously to the American people, far more then they knew, and what we are experiencing here to day in the USA is in a huge part a manipulation of Obama and his Admin for the UN.
Plus everyone who died as a result of the illegal military actions taken by Obama makes it Murder under our US Penal Code.
It is past itme for us to insist that all domestic enemies within the three branches of our government, and in the higher echelons of the US Military or the contractors they are using be ferreted out, be arrested, and prosecuted.
Can you please define for the forum what a "real war" consists of?
Tape a big red, white, and blue bow to the bunker buster and send it to Israel as an early Hanukkah gift. Better yet, sell the thing to them for twice what it took to make. Use proceeds to pay down our national debt.
Let them duke it out with Iran. We can provide support and keep other nations off their back, but no direct involvement. We can't afford it. We should save our resources for when we get directly attacked.
YEAH!!! Impeach Obama and Bush for destroying this country!!!
The fact that Obama said to quit the bluster and then his administration lets it be known that we are preparing, makes it an outright threat of military action if they don't quit the BS. Contrary to the Republican propaganda, Obama is showing surprising intestinal fortitude on this issue. He is beginning to get his 'sea legs' in Washington, which bodes well for his second term. The only way Obama could possibly lose 2012 is if the Republicans actually field a candidate.
Gentlemen, for starters... I will lay out the facts, and you take it from there!
Israel started the nuclear race in the Middle East.
Tell me how many countries did Iran attack the last 30 years, and how many countries did Israel attack ove rthe same time period? These are the facts. I can assure you that any attack on iran will hasted the demose of Isreal by 5-10 years. it will have great deal of difficulty surviving in the NEW MIDDLE EAST. See how soon Egypt will break diplomatic relations with Israel...
Problem is Nataniahu, and obviously the people who elected him, clearly he was a convivred criminal in israel. need I say more?
The professor
Here is how we solve multiple problems at one time. First, let's all agree we want to downsize our nuclear arsenal. We don't need so many bombs anymore. Second, we don't want to spend a lot of money doing it. Third, Iran is a threat. They want to build a bomb and drop it on Isreal. At least, that's what it sounds like if you listen to them. So, easy. We downsize our arsenal by nuking Iran, and then don't replace the warheads. Cheap, and effective.
Karaoke Jesus (and others): if the United States is to get into another war in the middle East, whether it is with Iran, Syria or whoever, it should only be after a Declaration of War is issued by the Congress. Let the chickenhawks put forth a declaration of war, rather than just talking points for the pundits.
to Knine and the other "impeach Obama" groups: you really do need to know your law. The SCOTUS has repeatedly pointed out that the Supreme law of the land is the US Constitution AND TREATIES. So, when US troops are made subject to being commanded by an allied military leader (as happened in WWI, WWII, and in Korea, and Vietnam, and Iraq 1, and Iraq II, and Afghanistan, and against Libya) there is nothing impeachable about it.
The fact remains, he is a black moderate/liberal Democrat and thats why you don't like him. The exact same actions taken by a white conservative Republican would not call forth cries of "impeach him." Get over it. You only have to endure his presidency for 5 1/2 more years. Then you might be able to have a Republican in the White House, if you can come up with a candidate who is not an idiot.
mathuin...
Real War??
What kind of sick f*ck are you....
Dennis-816242: I agree with you. The Iranians really want to see what a nuclear war is like. Fine, declare war on the United States, start shooting at our warships. They will find out that receiving nuclear warheads can make for a really bad day.
And if we decide to bomb Iran, I say we should go nuclear. I say if we have 'em, use 'em. What use are they if we never use them. We can always drill through the glass.
So if we should impeach Obama and prosecute him for all the deaths caused by the Iraq and Afhganistan wars since hes been in office, what should we do to george bush who should not of been president in the first place who started the wars illegally and the murdered people of his 8 years in office. It will have to be at least double the punishment of bush would you not say?
mathuin,
"Any clash with Iran will either see the use of some pretty sophisticated 'new' technology"
The technology is not really all that new. Such "bunker busters" were first developed for use during the first Gulf War in 1991 to 1992 for use against Saddam Hussein's Command, Control, and Communications bunker, and they were used for just that purpose. This particular one is probably just a follow-up on that one.
Does anyone really think Israel should sit back and let a self proclaimed enemy bent on their total destruction develop the weapons they need to do it!!! The Iranian leadership has stated publicly, multiple times that they do not believe that Israel has any right to exist and that it is their mission to wipe Israel off the map. Does anyone really expect the Israelis to sit back and let them develop nuclear weapons to do it with.
The recent Iranian releases regarding their work on their Fordo nuclear enrichment facility makes it pretty clear that they are looking at more than civilian nuclear power. Their claim that the 20% enriched uranium they are producing is only for a research reactor is an obvious lie. This is because they have already enriched many time the amount of uranium needed to fuel this research reactor to this higher level. The only reason for this massive production of 20% enriched uranium is as a precursor to further enrichment to weapons grade. The IAEA estimates that Iran has enough uranium stock to make enough highly enriched uranium to fuel approximately 15 good sized nuclear weapons.
The Iranian efforts towards installing new generation centrifuges capable of far more rapid enrichment of uranium also clearly indicates their plans to develop nuclear weapons. Since they already have far more 20% enriched uranium than they need for peaceful purposes, the only reason for upgrading a facility designed for higher level enrichment is to facilitate production of weapons grade material. Once they have these new centrifuges installed, the time they will need to produce weapons grade material will be uncomfortably short. It ill be to the point that they could have the material produced before we could plan and execute a strike on the facility to try and stop them. In addition, this facility was built well underground, making it very hard to take out and also clearly indicating its military purpose. Peaceful nations do not build facilities like this deep underground and deny IAEA inspectors access to the facility if their purpose is peaceful. In addition, if they really had nothing to hide (i.e. were not working on weapons) they would let the IAEA inspectors into any of their facilities any time they wanted. The fact that they won't clearly tells me they are hiding something.
It is time to stop screwing around and allowing the Iranians to stall with the hollow promise of talks. None of the many rounds of talks to date have resulted in any progress on getting them to stop. They have no intention of changing their plans to develop nuclear weapons and only military action will stop them.
IF this becomes necessary (and I emphasize "IF") why send pilots, and 30,000 pound "bunker buster" super-weapons in the bomb bays of $2 Billion Stealth Bombers, and the hundreds of other support aircraft necessary to take out Iran's air defenses in advance of the strike, all in an attempt to partially destroy Iran's vast and widely dispersed nuclear facilities and set-back its efforts to obtain nuclear weapons?
It's not necessary to directly risk a single American or Allied military forces life.
Instead simply inform Iran's leaders, publicly and with absolute clarity, that if Iran continues its enrichment work beyond a NEAR DATE CERTAIN, but a date known only to the United States and its Military Allies, that nuclear program will be stopped without Iran's cooperation ....and the military target of all of the bombs and the missiles will be Iran's ruling Mullahs and political leadership! "Cut off the head of the snake, and the body will die."
Inform Iran that the attacks on leadership will be done by tens of thousands of high explosive stand-off cruise missiles and remotely piloted drone vehicles carrying 'smart' missiles. Tell them that the attacks will continue daily, and will not cease until Iran's entire leadership has been destroyed; or until Iran's remaining leadership renounces in the General Assembly of the UN all further nuclear enrichment work and begins dismantling its enrichment facilities, supervised by an unfettered team of UN Inspectors.
And if Iran should stop dismantling those facilities at any time -- even for one day -- before they are all completely removed, the cruise missile and drone attacks on Iran's leadership will begin again immediately.
If Iran is in fact a "rational actor", there is nothing which quite focuses the attention of a rational belligerent as the guaranteed certainty that if they persist in their belligerence ... they will die.
JonSmith,
News Flash for you: Bush is no longer President. You can no longer impeach him, idiot.
Knine........You have been reading to many emails that put forth information as being factual. Not one thing in you post is backed by any credible source of information. I am sure you are right, but just help me to find where this statements can be verified.
People can have a belief based on a gut feeling of how they see and feel about anything. Hell, I have a lot of gut feelings about a whole lot of things that I can not prove or disprove. The real danger comes
when someone else with these gut feelings starts creating information that is not true and calling it fact to get others to believe and pass it on as being a true educational/reportable fact or comment.
They do a disservice to the "point they are trying to make", create emotional confrontations from distortions of half truths to flat out lies. They suspect others feel the same way on a issue but might not be able to convince others of it's validity and in turn they rationalize what they know is made up by telling themselves, "they will thank me latter" AND because they know in there gut that they are right, it then makes sense to them THAT "any means justifies the ends".
How many battlefields have been created throughout history as a consequence to this attempt to make a point?
Read this article from Thomas Sowell (before Super Tuesday) before you even consider to vote this November. Forward it to all that you know:
____
Many people are looking to the many primary elections on March 6th -- "Super Tuesday" -- to clarify where this year's Republican nomination campaign is headed.
It may clarify far more than that, including the future of this nation and of Western civilization. If a clear winner with a commanding lead emerges, the question then becomes whether that candidate is someone who is likely to defeat Barack Obama.
If not, then the fate of America -- and of Western nations, including Israel -- will be left in the hands of a man with a lifelong hostility to Western values and Western interests.
President Obama is such a genial man that many people, across the ideological space, cannot see him as a danger.
For every hundred people who can see his geniality, probably only a handful see the grave danger his warped policies and ruthless tactics pose to a whole way of life that has given generation after generation of Americans unprecedented freedom and prosperity.
The election next November will not be just another election, and the stakes add up to far more than the sum of the individual issues. Moreover, if reelected and facing no future election, whatever political constraints may have limited how far Obama would push his radical agenda will be gone.
He would have the closest thing to a blank check. Nothing could stop him but impeachment or a military coup, and both are very unlikely. A genial corrupter is all the more dangerous for being genial.
KNINE
Take your pills, sit down, find a blanket and turn on the tv.
Obama only cares about keeping the lid on until after the election. Nothing else matters to him except getting re-elected, and the potential of Israel being hit with an atomic bomb is not high on his list of concerns.
Ed NavDoc - TET-68, Cua Viet, 9" shrapnel slash in my left lower back. Navy Corpman wraps bandage around waist putting intestines back inside me until I get Med Evac'ed to NavHosp Danang and U.S.S. Repose - DAMN it sure didn't seem like no Police Action to me????? I always SALUTE any Navy Corpsman or Doctor I see, so to you today, I SALUTE You. One of yours saved my life in 1968. Let those who served decide.
Read this article from Thomas Sowell...
Thomas Sowell is a joke for a columnist. His articles have little to no actual evidence to support his claims. He works through fear mongering, and not through factual evidence. Anyone who pays attention to the news can see right through practically anything he writes about.
Iran is a Theocracy run by old men. The Revolutionary Guard (Mostly College Students at the time when they stormed our embassy) are enjoying there positions of power.
They have a lot of problems....the biggest being that the majority of the Persian populace is under 30 years of age and probably the best educated in all to the Mid East. The old men and Rev Guard are watching Syria and are attempting a balancing act to stay in power while allowing more freedom of choice.
Sanctions are curtailing choices with the rise of a very illegal black market being run by educated college students. Once you break one law, it gets easier to break more and challenge the powers that be.
Say what you will about Obama...he is far from perfect....but this article sounds like a page from Teddy Roosevelt. Obama says no war, we want diplomacy while and un-named high source describes our newest bomb and what it can do..........Ahhhhh yes...."Walk softly, but CARRY A VERY BIG STICK"
The Mullahs may be fanatics and I do think they are, but they have a Tiger by the Tail and I am betting they will blink first and back down. If they do not.......Obama will use the stick.
A Veteran
WELCOME HOME MY BROTHER, WELCOME HOME !!!!!
1 Inf. Nam 68 / 69
bob
In the long run it would be cheaper for the UN to build and operate its own nuclear energy facilities in Iran and other unstable nations.
If the UN gives them nuclear power, their government cannot use energy production as an excuse for weapons manufacture. If it is unacceptible to us for threatening countries to posess nukes, we should have taken out the Soviets the second they stole the technology in the first place.
Tell you what, if you want war you better get on that front line, cause you ain't making that call for me or any kid out there today. No, your making that call for you and only you, you don't get the right to make that choice for everyone else. Just yourself. Still think it should happen? DO YOU WANT WAR?
All of you that liked Mathuin's post, enlist now. I wanna see you put your money where your mouth is.
"Dogma Bites", No I don't think so. Besides, anytime the intelligence is applied, it has nothing to do with the current administration. This is just as bad as "Military Intelligence". What a joke.
bob1/28 - And to you my Brother, Welcome Home and Thank You for your Service. I wrote something in 1967, please go to www.riflewarrior.com/vietnam.html It was for you and all of us over there. Peace.
@mygirl1
My opposion to Israel is based on fact...their country was founded on lies, deceit and murder. Their entire history is steeped in treachery and murder. With a country like Israel as an ally you don't any other enemies. They are a bllod-sucking leech of a country, run by murderous blood-thirsty leaders...they are just as bad as Iran...well maybe worse, because with Iran you know where they stand with the Jews...they will smile and shake your hand while the other hand is on the knife in your back.
We won't do war with Iran! Obama has already got a taste of that butt puddin, he'll be on his knees suckin and lickin his lips.
Veteran, I sincerely thank you for comments. I'm sure I can speak for 99.9% of all combat medical people when I say we did not think of ourselves as special or as heroes. I flew as medical aircrew on Marine UH-1 Hueys from a helicopter carrier off the coast of Da Nang, . I, like others just tried to do the job I was trained to do to the best of my ability. Sometimes it was enough and sometimes it was not. I am still haunted by the ones where it was not and I am still haunted by those demons. To me, the truest heroes are those that made the ultimate sacrifice to God and country and did not make it back alive. I do however salute all vets past and present whether they have seen combat or not. Service is still service no matter how you look at it! Semper Fi my brothers and sisters!
HM1/FMF USN/RET HM NEC 8452/8404 1972 - 1993
Ed-NavDoc - Every Medic and Corpsman I've ever met say how they are haunted by the ones they couldn't save. All I can say my Brother is I know the horror will never go away, but try and think of the ones who DID make it. I ask my self every day if I have lived life in a way that honors all of those who did not come home. And I give thanks every day to the Corpsman who was there for me. I swear, if I could, I would take your horrors into myself so that you could find the peace you deserve. Maybe them and my own demons would get into such turmoil that they would cancel each other out. You hang in there. Peace. God Bless all our Troops, past, present and future.
What can I say but thank you my friend, my brother. Believe it or not I actually learned to put many of my demons to rest during my stays in Antarctica. I think it was the peace and the solitude that helped make the difference. Still sometimes, in the still of the night, the nightmares come. But only rarely now. God bless and good night.
David-717708 was spotted saying....
Uh, you might want to actually know what you are talking about before posting... The House, (part of congress) has already passed a resolution authorizing and requiring military force to be used to prevent Iran from acquiring or threatening the US or it's allies with nuclear weapons. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/05/20125182157963338.html
Obama will sit and do nothing. Hes weak president.
Yea, use of diplomacy before resorting to violence is definitely "weakness".
Ask Osama bin Ladin and Muammar Gaddafi (along with countless other dead terrorists) how weak President Obama has been with his decision making against enemies of the United States. I'm sure they'd tell you all about it, except for that inconvenience of being dead.
Yeah, hopefully we can elect a REPUBLICAN in 2012 who will finally get Osama bin Laden.
Republicans are tough manly-men and wars started by Republican Presidents always tend to work out well.
Another stupid troll post.
"We, the German Fuhrer and Chancellor, and the British Prime Minister, have had a further meeting today and are agreed in recognizing that the question of Anglo-German relations is of the first importance for our two countries and for Europe.
We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again.
We are resolved that the method of consultation shall be the method adopted to deal with any other questions that may concern our two countries, and we are determined to continue our efforts to remove possible sources of difference, and thus to contribute to assure the peace of Europe.
My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honor. I believe it is "peace for our time." Go home and get a nice quiet sleep"
-Neville Chamberlain
September 30, 1938
oboma at least is trying to keep us solders from dieing for a true rouge terrorist nation. Americans should not have to prop up the jews and the jews know without the us if they atack iran isreal and the jews will cease to exist
Tell that to the following dead or captured terrorists leaders:
Your comment is both uninformed and pathetic. Try extracting your head from Limbaugh's a$$.
Steven B - I appreciate the historic tour. I also appreciate your patriotism and dedication to doing what is best for our nation. You are of course enlisting in the United States Army to head up the attack on Iran, correct? Just imagine yourself rushing toward the heathen enemy with your cross in one hand, M-4 in the other, 80 lb. rucksack on your back and 40 lbs. of body armor...
...unless of course, this is all cackling of the Great American Chicken Hawk.
You're welcome. Now, what did you learn from the lesson?
I already served. US Navy. Got the DD-214s. Probably before you were even a twinkle in yer mommy's eye.
Now, how about you?
#3.6
Maybe you should work on spelling and grammar in your free time? It would be to your benefit.
Yes, like Kennedy did in Vietnam. Oh, wait...
Ol_Doc, as per your list above I most certainly will not thank Obama. I will however give heart Well Dones to the CIA, U.S. Special Operations Command, and last but certainly not least SEAL Team 6. They did all the legwork. They gathered the intelligence. And most of all put their lives on the line! Obama only said go for OBL and probably a few other high value targets on the list. The rest he probably was told after the fact as the ground commanders on site were most likely authorized to give approval.
HM1/FMF USN/RET 1972 - 1993
Allot of credit going to Obama for getting the terrorists. Wait. Obama didn't get anything. The system that got bin Laden was put in place by Bush. Obama watched it on TV. It's time for people to stop making up crap to support our President. I wanted nothing but the best for Obama when I placed my vote for him. Unfortunately, I have been greatly disappointed in his vision of thecountry. I am not a religious person, but I think Obama's biggest mistake is his attack on christian religions while pandering to Islam. This could be the nail in the coffin. If you don't know what I mean, you will in the next couple of weeks. And our mainstream press is complicit in keeping the facts of this matter from the public.
Steven B......you said:
Actually, the Republic of Vietnam (under Diem) was a product of the EISENHOWER administration (See: http://www.pbs.org/battlefieldvietnam/history/index.html & Eisenhower's Letter of Support to Ngo Dinh Diem, October 23, 1954 at http://vietnam.vassar.edu/overview/doc5.html).
Furthermore, the "domino theory", which was the geopolitical underpinning of the Vietnam War was first proposed as policy by and during the EISENHOWER administration. To wit:
The Kennedy administration can be faulted for continuing and even expanding our involvement in Vietnam. JFK cannot, however, be faulted for beginning that involvement. So, technically, Carl We's point is correct.
Do you, Steven B, believe that our Vietnam War was a mistake ?
Understatement of the year.
Coracii Obama didn't get Daffy. It was the Libyans who got him.
It was the Navy seals who got bin Laden, not Obama.
It was extremely foolish for Obama to send the seals in with a kill order for bin Laden. One always tries to capture the opposing general to obtain from him information. Obama ordered a kill mission for bin Laden from the start. Obama ordered the disposal of the body before the DNA evidence was in that that body was that of bin Laden. That is if in fact you want to believe that a DNA test was done and that the DNA test came back positive for a body that was bin Laden and if you want to be that the body dumped in the water was actually that of bin Laden.
So Steven B...
Since you're such a fan of war why dont you get an M16 and head off to Iran...
And each of those terrorists have been replaced. You forget what the Afghans did to the Russians? Everytime the Russians massacred a village or killed a head man, they just chose a new one and went back after the Russians until it got to costly for the Russians and they got out.
All that history you forgot? Same is happening here. The Afghans have never been conquered and with the Pakistanis helping them we are wasting blood and time there. Carpet bomb the area and drag everything out. Hit Iran with everything and keep the straits clear.
Obama is a fool. Anyone who forgets history is destined to repeat it. And here we are repeating it.
Ol_Doc, you rattle off that list of names so readily. Are you related?
bookworm12,
First, the Seals had an order to capture bin Laden if possible. The seals felt threatened and blew his sorry ass away. They took pictures and they also took a DNA sample. It was him, so don't be an idiot and think it was not.
American Socialist WE are waiting for you to tell your idol to get the hell out of Iraq, Afghanistan, South Korea and Nato. Then we take care of Iran and go home.
alan290 Alan review the tapes. The first tapes of the event said it was a capture/kill order. The revised tapes stated that the order was from the start a kill order. I blew up when I heard that. I verified that it was a strictly kill order. Review the tapes and command.
2 May 2011 – WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. special forces team that hunted down Osama bin Laden was under orders to kill the al Qaeda mastermind, ...
If it was just a kill order, we are probably better off. Just think what we would be going through with him as a captive... Hundreds of Americans would probably be kidnapped and held for exchange with that SOB. They did get a ton of records when they raided the compound, and we will probably benefit more from that than the small amount of information they would have to beat out of bin Laden. He would probably not have given any information anyway.
Steven B
Kennedy did NOT start full engagement in Vietnam. That was done by LBJ after the military industrial comp;ex had JFK assassinated because hi\e did not want to got to war there..
bookworm12
Bush put out the Dead or Alive.....but it is best he is dead in an unmarked un-recoverable grave. A Martyr we do not need.
ol doc - My weapon of choice was an M-60 Machinegun, has a sound you never forget and can pick out the rest of your life.
Ed Nav Doc - HM1/FMF - I KNEW it.
SingBiker - You are most correct, in a Top Secret, just released, document that President Kennedy signed, he wanted 1,000 Advisors out of Vietnam by the end of '63, and completely out within the next 12 months. It was Johnson's war.
JFK was assasinated because he wanted to do the same thing Ron Paul wants to do....shut down the Federal Reserve.
Friends, you underestimate Obama and Bush. During their administration of the country was carried out at least four successful coups and four successful military operations, which are known to all. The loss of U.S. soldiers in these companies is very low, even by modern standards.
Ol_Doc, every time the U.S. announces a reward for the head of a terrorist, I am reminded of William Stranix from the movie "Under Siege" and Travis Dane from the continuation of the same movie.
bulldog dude - And YOU are ALSO correct. Kennedy was going to do away with the Federal Reserve and already had $6,000,000,000 in silver certificates printed. He wanted to go to the silver standard. The clash with the FED and his un-willingness to escalate the Vietnam War is what got him Assassinated. And everybody on these vines, you bet your asses I'm a consipracy theorist. If you believe the Warren Commission report, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you.
A Veteran
Yep, my FMF experiences with the Green Machine was in the early part of my career. My Antarctic OAE experience on the Ice was toward the end. Would not have traded either for the world!
Iran wuold be foolish to take on the U.S. or for that matter Israel.
Because Iran has supporters like Russia and China.
Can anybody say proxy war?
Well Ahmadickhead seems to be a foolish man...so does the "supreme" leader.
Israel will take out Iran's nuclear sites. they will tell us when they are on the way, but not give us advance notice. If Russia and China want to go after Israel they will be taken out too, every battle is Israel's LAST in their minds. Israel has Fleet Ballistic Missle Submarines. They put fear into everybody, you don't know where they are and they can rain down hell in 15 minutes.
Israel is nothing but a bag of hot air, pushing for a war to be fought and paid for by the USA. They won't do anything. They were whipped by Hezbollah in Lebanon. Without American supplied air power, Israel would be a third rate power and be forced to obey internetional laws and rules.
To the posters who keep claiming Iran is threatening to wipe Israel off the map, you are nothing but liars. Iran has stated clearly, they will not be the first to start a war and will attack only if attacked. Iran knows their first attack would be their last attack and they do not have a death wish. You people read too much Israeli propaganda.
No more wars for Israel.
Would that be because that is the only nation in the Middle East with WMD capabilities
(nuke, chem & bio) ?
You will truly be left behind...
Why dont we just target Aneedadinnajacket? This might solve a whole bunch of problems at once!
What the huck do you mean. Where has Iran been wanting to take on the US? I see, ""We would be happy if this thing is resolved peacefully, if Iran decides to stop its nuclear program," he said according to the Telegraph. "To stop it, to dismantle its facility in Qom, and to stop enriching uranium."" Prove it. Iran says they are not seeking a nuclear weapon. The two things that probably would have presented all this Mid-East turmoil are the only two things never tried by this or any other administration. They have always asked for us to pull our troops out of their country and leave them the f alone. We have tried neither of those. Instead it has been war, sanctions, threats, everything else but a possible peaceful solution. If those people did not feel threatened by the only country to have used nuclear weapons and their armies in their lands, maybe they would already have had their own revolution to transform the country as they like. They have been taught Islam all their lives and now we want to bomb it out. What makes you think they would accept that. I would rather die in my old shack that be forced to bow down some man who thought I should think like he does.
It seems to me they have been taking on the US and Israel through state sponsored terrorism. It IS extremely stupid to threaten to attack out ships and posture to try to eliminate sanctions that they are racking up.
Wait a minute....
Mr. Pannnetetia just stated that he, as the Secretary of Defense, would need to get International (U.N.) approval for using U.S. military forces.
Wow, another great choice for filling a Cabinet postion, Mr. Obama.
First gut the military by cutting spending.....then "ASK FOR APPROVAL" from the U.N. BEFORE use of military forces.
ANOTHER reason this Democrat will NOT VOTE for Mr. Obama's re-election.
Given the fact that Muslim cultures have never apologized or condemned the acts of violence from their habitual aggressors I would say yes," Drop that bunker monster..
So funny all these comments on what each one of you would do. Not a one of you have run for any government office and certainly you have no up to date knowledge(CIA, or any other intelligance info from any org.) So when both Bushes got international backing, it was wrong? or only when Obama does it?......ya dufas. Oh yeah, "another reason why I won't vote for Obama." You won't vote for him because you are racist. Try to come up with a real reason...you can't. Everything is getting better except for repubs trying to take the country down just to get Obama out of the whitehouse so the rich can go back to taking the rest of your money. If you are not a millionaire, concerning your own interst, you should be voting for Dems. If you are a greedy millionaire, I said greedy, then vote for repubs. DXon't think out each issue, just respond with chosen words for you by Newt Gingrich word list. The list of words republicans get everyday to get you to jump up and down for them and not think.
""What good fortune for governments that the people do not think."- Adolf Hitler."
I do not see the big positive point to starting WW3 at all.. Millions will die and we will once again be holding the bag.. These Islam-o-Fascists seem eager to incite war but not so eager to poke the tiger and get into a real war with the US.. What if we just told Russia and China to go ahead and split Iran 50/50 as long as it would bring stability to the area.. Calling Israel weak and saying they lost the local fight is silly.. I think they have shown to be very prudent and not wipe the hostile population off the map.. Palestinians keep accusing them of genocide but if Israel wanted to they could rain Armageddon on them and that would be genocide..
Hey, fellow readers ----- Does anyone know of a weapon system, that can actually deliver a single 30,000 lb. bomb other than the B-52, B-1, and B-2 ? These weapons are held solely by the U.S.A.F. and would be flown by U.S. pilots. Other aircraft (C-130, C-141, C-17, etc.) can carry such a load, but would only be available to drop a device by parachute and besides, they fly WAY TOO SLOW to successfully penetrate the Iranian airspace and evade Iranian defenses.
Don't need no 30,000 lb. bomb to take out Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities. 2 facilites x 2 nukes each should do it. And you'd better believe Israel knows exactly where they are and what is needed to take them out. Turn the mountains under which they are hidden into glass and slag craters.
They would not know what a "Proxy War" is if it bite off their ____(fill in the blank)_____.
The Russian Federation and Chinese use Fundamentalist Islamic Iran as their "Proxy Fighter"; Fundamentalist Islamic Iran uses the Islamic Jihadists Worldwide as their "Proxy Fighters" as funded by the Mandatory Islamic Tithes (Trillions USDs per year) from the 1.5 Billion Islamic Believers Worldwide.
The Strategic Goals of the Russian Federation, Chinese, and Fundamentalist Islamic Iran has been to get the US and US Allies out of their Backyards (Resources) at the Middle East, Africa, Asia, (currently expanding to South and Central Americas, including negotiating the stationing of Iranian IRBMs), etc..
Before anyone wants to start something, how about waiting about less than 3 months so that most of us can go back on Retirement again (Never to be Recalled to Active Duty again as "Too Old").
And by the way good luck attempting to drop one "Bunker Buster" on the previous hole created by another "Bunker Buster", then drop another and another in the same hole. As just like the other previous "Experts" stated the wrong depth of the Iranian Facilities*; not later than June 2012, the Iranians will be dug in so deep they might be feeling the heat from Hades.
*Kind of like the so called "Experts" (that never worked in the Nuclear (Weapons) Physics field (experience not academics or theory)) that said in 2010 that the Iranians will not have a Nuclear weapons capability for decades. As they did not count the fact that the Russian Federation did the hard part, processing tons of Iranian rock (uranium ore) into the metal form of uranium, with the Iranians having the current capability to further enrich that metal form of uranium into weapons grade. And based on the Nuclear Weapons designs used during WWII, the Iranians do not need plutonium. These so called "Experts" fail to realize that the Father of the Pakistanis Nuclear Weapons Program has been on a very long vacation at Iran for quite a while now (so the Iranians do not have to do "experiments" or trial and error). And by the way you do NOT need a Megaton Nuclear Weapon to take out a Major European or US City, a Kiloton Tactical Nuclear Weapon in an airburst will do that also (Europe currently in range of the Iranian IRBMs and the ICBMs that they bought from the North Koreans as shipped thru Bejing China 2010 can actually reach the US and Canada.). Not to say that the Fundamentalist Islamic Iranians are not too smart; but, it would be much easier for them to buy Pakistanis Nuclear Weapons, turn them into MIRVs (with many decoys to defeat any US or US Ally ABMs), and then put these on their IRBMs and ICBMs along with 21st Century GNCs and countermeasures manufactured by the Chinese and Russian Federation (the Iranians already built their IRBM and ICBM Missile Silos, similar to the previous US "Cold War" Era Missile Silos designed to withstand a direct Nuclear Attack; not counting all the ones on mobile TELs.).
The last US Weapon made to destroy underground Facilities that deep was almost completely deleted from written records* in accordance with the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, SALT, START, etc.; the Earth Penetrator Warhead for the Pershing II Missiles as designed to kill the hardened underground USSR Command Centers, as well as attacking the USSR Ural Mountain Complex, similar to what the Iranians have done to the Iranian Mountains.
*You cannot do a memory wipe on all the people associated with that Earth Penetrator warhead that "did not exist" or "was never manufactured" as deployed with the 56th Field Artillery (Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces).
Shows just how much you do not know about Fundamentalist Islamic Iran. The Ayatollahs have their hands so far up President Ahmadinejad's arse that they can make his mouth move. The Ayatollahs control everything at Fundamentalist Islamic Iran.
The time for any "Military Options" has long past. That window of opportunity was already closing in 2010 when the US Ally Saudi Arabia was demanding US Military or Israel Military Actions; then later that same year begging for US Military or Israelis Military Actions.
You are so correct, but sometimes there needs to be a catalyst for some time of action to take place.
So you send in US Military Asymmetric Warfare Teams attached to SAD/SOG to terminate President Ahmadinejad and they fail and are possibly caught creating more excuses for Fundamentalist Islamic Iran. Or the Teams succeed and then all the Fundamentalist Islamic Iranian finger waving starts demanding that the Islamic Jihadists Worldwide strike, and then he is replaced with another Ayatollah approved puppet.
What are the gains and losses?
Do not even say precision airstrike, I know better than that from actually doing Targeting and Target Damage Assessments.
I can see the writing on the wall:
Secretary of Defense Panetta on a special visit to the U.N. headquaters: "I would like permission from the U.N. Security Council (Council is composed of five permanent members — China, France, Russian
Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States) to use bunker buster bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities and ask for a quick vote."
Hmmmm.....request denied.
The bomb is hardly an issue...The latest LASER
Stop being stupid
IRAN is waiting (just like the Christians)
FOR another dumb-ass too save them
Problem is...they will get virgins if they try too bring this on (and they will die for virgins)
SO SAD
I saw GAS PRICES GO UP....20 cents in one day (today...MARCH 9th, 2012)
OK...screw you and Me also because even If I don't use GAS...* I WILL PAY *
FOOD...and everything else
Totally stupid
I think it is a pretty safe assumption that both the Iraqis and Syrians were fairly sure Israel was "nothing but a bag of hot air" before it took out the nuclear reactors in both the aforementioned countries. Anyone care to place bets on three out of four?
Obama is doing exactly what I voted him to do...thank you Barak.
What was he 'exactly' doing? Writing apologizes with his color crayons? Not to the dead soldiers families who lost their loved ones, over his stupid blunders in Afghan, but rather over some books accidentally being burned. Stick that carrot up your loving donkey azz!
Demetrious - Want to blame someone for killing US Soldiers needlessly? Drop back a few years to your hero GW Bush. He, after all, started both wars.
Now take your Geritol and go back to Limpbaugh.
"When they show you who they are...believe them!"
Remind us again why Bush went into Afghanistan?
Ol...Doc. Yes GW Bush Jr started both wars with the almost complete support of both republicans, and donkeys in congress. I would guess that is a 'we' instead of a 'he'. The war is over in Iraq because Bush Jr signed a peace treaty with the Iraq leaders that all USA military personal will be removed before the end of 2011. No future president could change that treaty. Now we have your Bummer Obama who wants to stay in Afghan until the end of 2013. He has choices. He has no treaties that handcuff him to a binding contract. .... Needless killing? We as Americans will face that fact over almost the next two years in Afghan if we continue this donkey 'warmongering', 'beating war drums' type of idiocy/policy. Yeah, how does the horseshoe fit on the other foot donkey? Don't worry you will still have a chance to chase that carrot.
OL DOC what would you have done after 9/11? Sat home and prayed?
Notice that it says "this year." Now I wonder why that could be? Perhaps in case he doesn't get elected and therefore can blame the entire mess on the next President? Or perhaps if he does get elected again, he can talk about how "he" (personally) avoided a war?
Uhh, its Barack. Geez, at least learn how to spell the name of your saviour, Barack Obozo (sic). ;-)
Illmore...Barak is doing what you put him in office to do? What was that destroy America? You should be as ashamed as obuttwipe should be. HOPE FOR CHANGE 2012 ABO
oh yeah...for the record you can call him barrack or barry soetoro...that's what his butt buddy Larry Sinclair calls him when between the sheeits! (no typ-o either!)
mathuin: you wrote above...
"I sincerely hope that if we join a war against Iran, it will be a real war and not some 'police action' like Viet Nam or Afghanistan"
You are either a toal fool or a sick troll!
Wouldn't say he destroyed America anymore then Bush's patriot act and that's just one notch on the stone. Nope I still think its appropriate to blame Bush this far down the road. Yeah the economy isn't promising, but it is on a positive note. Can't say anyone has the right to be angry at him for not fixing that much faster, can't have your cake and eat it... just sayin'...
Well, look at massive unemployment of US workers at 25%, Wall Street down from a high of 14,000 to 2,000 today, Osama bin Laden elected as the President of Afghanistan and Pakistan, Israel has been nuked by Syria....
As you can see, Obama has destroyed America.
(And for the people too dim-witted to get it, yes I am being sarcastic.)
So funny, yet sad to still see people who have not heard the news yet about Bush Jr and his cabinet lied about weapons of mass destruction when they started the Iraq war. Have you been hiding in a rathole all these years like Saddam? You show the greatest amount of ignorance possible political wise, to not know what the whole world knows!!!!! When Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeldt and others started this war, they abandoned trying to kill/captute Bin Laden in Afgan and Pakistan. Bush let Paskistan troops protect Bin Laden, then lost him because he removed the needed troops there. Ask Colin Powell how he felt about being lied to!......Jesus..... you spend hrs on the computer whining and have no clue about the Iraq war or any other political facts on national issues. Do search on Bush Iraq war lies........""What good fortune for governments that the people do not think."- Adolf Hitler."
Trent-3873964, starsailing, Byron Raum,
Your no Real World Experience Rants are Showing.
Written Documented Facts versus your emotive non factual rants.
Justification Weapons of Mass Destruction, Section 2 "Findings", US Law, H.R.4655 "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" as demanded by your other savior "I did not have sex with that woman":
And when I say NO REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE, it was NOT your arse that went in Blind into Iraq under US Law H.R.4655 to hire hundreds of thousands of Shia assassins and insurgents to Overthrow President Hussein and the Iraqis Government. We went into Iraq Blind because your savior gutted the US Intelligence Agencies so that there were NO US Intelligence Assets at Iraq for us to link up with, this gutting of US Intelligence Assets will not be repaired for decades, result US had to rely on "potentially hostile" nations like Jordan and Pakistan for non credible non verifiable information according to the US Congressional 9/11 Commission.
After 1998 Operation Desert Fox, H.R.4655 "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" became US Military Operation Iraqis Freedom 1998 to 2011.
In 2002 as the First Declared War since WWII, with Both Houses of US Congress Declaring War (previous House of Representatives H.R.4655, and US Senate 2002 Iraqi War Resolution with US Congressional Appropriations) we again went into Iraq Blind to conduct 2002-2003 Operation Hotel California.
We also went into Afghanistan Blind to Overthrow the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government of Afghanistan weeks after the 9/11 2001 Attacks.
Pertaining to the Termination of Osama Bin Laden, FACTS:
Just to terminate Osama Bin Laden. 2006 President Bush Amended the US No Assassination Policy regardless of the opposition of all US Politicians fearing that another Nation can then justify the assassination of US Politicians. see Harvard International Law Review.
Almost all US Military Missions were opposed by President Obama fearing for his Political Career. You can wait about 20 years to obtain the Mission Videos from the Rescue of Captain Phillips under the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA). The Mission Videos to the C4I Helicopter (Pakistan) to the Video Conferences at Afghanistan (General Petraeus and Bagram AFB), SOC, JSOC (Admiral McRaven), CIA (Leon Penetta), Pentagon, Whitehouse. Pay special attention to the conversations during the 23 minute communications blackout at the Whitehouse. The knowledge of these Missions that General Petraeus and Leon Penetta have is the leverage that they used against President Obama to get their current positions.
You claim in your posts that Bush lied, I proved and can prove with written Historically Documented Facts that you are wrong; so what does that make both of you?
By the way Byron Raum as some unclassified information, why did President Obama backpeddle so fast that he would win the tour de france going backwards on President Bush's Plan to deploy US Military ABMs to Europe? Specificially, December 31, 2011 deployment of US Military ABMs to Romania. Once again no Real World Experience nor Facts, just a bunch of emotive non factual opinions.
Redherring 90
Please tell us where you got your information that Israel has threated France and Germany.
google "Samson Option" you'll get hundreds of hits, and the Israelis have stated this many times since they aquired nukes that if they were going down they would take everyone else with them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option_(book)
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/the_samson_option_palestine_and_is.html
these arent just assumptions- this has come directly from the mouths of several Israeli leaders.
This device is obviously anupdated version of a device that we have had and first used in the1st Gulf War known as the MOAB (known to the troops as the Mother Of All Bombs!). The original devices were ground level detonation devices. DOD has obviously since devised and added hardened penetrator heads to the same devices.
As much as I detest the Iranian government, the sad part is that we would be smarter to let Iran make the first move before entering into any conflict with them. If we or the Israelis strike first, world opinion, especially in the Middle East would rally to Iran's side and would consider Iran the victim and us the aggressors. (Not that Israel really gives a rat's behind about world opinion anyway, but that's beside the point) If Iran strikes first, that gives us a free hand to take the gloves off and use the full might of our arsenal to raze their infrastructure to the ground!
Agreed, being the first aggressor would be a huge and stupid mistake. Prepare for the worst, but do not throw the first punch. If Iranian leaders know they are DEAD IMMEDIATELY if they attack anyone then they will throw fits and puff up like N. Korea, but never actually do anything.
Ed-NavDoc Yes let the Iranians throw a few bombs at Israeli cities with dirty bombs and make Israeli uninhabitable for the next 100 years, you and EngEsq are quite right. Didn't Chernobyl and the Japanese nuclear accident teach you anything?
1) Iran has far more missiles than Israel and could overwhelm their missile defense system. They could demolish Israel today, however retaliation would be just as bad for Iran. The only reason they don't is fear of retaliation. It being a conventional weapon or dirty bomb makes no difference.
2) Jerusalem is a holy city for Muslims too. Making it uninhabitable by radiation would not be in their benefit either. Again, there is no reason for added alarm.
Please use your brain, I know it is hard for those who believe killing Bin Laden was a hoax, but try anyway.
While Iran may have more missles, it does not have Israel's work ethic.
Optomyst, you really missed the point there.
The MOAB was a 25,000 lb bomb that exploded just before impact and people's ears would bleed within 1\2 mile of detonation. Bunker buster is designed to go subterranean through rock, reinforced concrete and explode once deep within target. Kinda designed opposite. MOAB would kill anything above ground and bunker buster would do the same underground hundreds of feet.
Quite a weapon! Glad it is ours! Now obuttwipe wants to cut Military R&D...I guess so his muslim bruthas can catch up with our technology. He's probably already sent them the blueprints!
HOPE FOR CHANGE 2012 ABO
No i didn't. Maybe you did.
Eng Esq, Do you honestly in your mind believe that OSAMA bin Ladin was killed by U.S. Forces, and then not Displayed for the whole world to see ? The Greatest Liar since P.T.Barnum has everyone hoodwinked! No Corpus Delectide, No Case ! Heresay evidence is not allowed in any Court ! ! Dumping the Body at Sea ? Har Har Hardee Har Har ! Why, to get rid of the evidence ? If a few Muslim Terrorist would be pissed off because he didn't get a Muslim burial, Who gives a Rats Behind? This was the best Smoke and Mirror act I have ever witnessed! The Greatest Show on Earth of course was "The Imposter" getting elected! Woe unto us if we repeat the same mistake over again !!!
Ohhhhh...Marceeeeellllllll-2112373..........Bin Laden is alive and hiding in your closet........he is under your bed....he is coming to get you.........tonight...he's gonna getcha!...Booga Booga...! Look ot behind you....what's that noise?..........he's coming to get you!!!!!!!
I'm still puzzling over what delivery system the Israelis have that could drop a 30,000 pound bomb? It makes little sense to ask for the GBU-57 without a way of delivering the package to the recipient.
Their Heron drones are big (737-sized), but only capable of a 1000kg payload, and 30,000 pounds is way over the capability of the F-15s and F-16s in the Israeli inventory. And it's also way over any throw weight I've seen ascribed to Israeli missiles.
Unless they've got a Bear or a B2 stashed away somewhere, it seems an odd request.
The Isreali's not only requested the bomb , but the means to deliver them.
Ed-NavDoc,
You say that you are a US Military Veteran and have seen the horrors of War. Well, so have we and we are worn out and sick of doing the dirty deeds done dirt cheap (paid below minimum wages). There are not very many of us left (survivors), after see post#5.13.
So PLEASE wait at least 3 months more, so that we can all go back on Retirement again. Half of us as Forced Retirements under President Obama's Reduction In Forces of the US Military, the other half (including myself) as Retirement again never to be Recalled again as Too Old.
Again, as far as the Osama Bin Laden termination as a Special Reconnaissance Mission that developed into a Direct Action. You can wait about 20 years to obtain the Mission Videos from the Rescue of Captain Phillips under the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) and The Mission Videos to the C4I Helicopter (Pakistan) to the Video Conferences at Afghanistan (General Petraeus and Bagram AFB), SOC, JSOC (Admiral McRaven), CIA (Leon Penetta), Pentagon, Whitehouse. Pay special attention to the conversations during the 23 minute communications blackout at the Whitehouse. The knowledge of these Missions that General Petraeus and Leon Penetta have is the leverage that they used against President Obama to get their current positions.
As far as the "Bunker Busters" see post #4.16..
And anyone that wants to do something, you go into Iran to do targeting and terminal guidance as part of Special Reconnaissance (not in uniforms). Like US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces did while attached to SAD/SOG at Yemen and Libya. Do NOT volunteer others to do what you refuse to do.
So DAVID...I imagine you know where Bigfoot is hiding too eh?......Glad you were there to see everything for us. What would we do without your secret intelligence....You are worn out from doing military work dirt cheap eh? Bush/Cheney set up the war profiteer system for you to work at 3-4 times the pay once you leave the military . Do the same job for the Blackwater/Haliburton boys(whatever their new name they are hiding under today). Whine about retirement when you can rake in all that Do, Re ,Mi that repubs set up in Iraq/Afgan. Go ahead...sign up and quit whining. For all you people that think you know what is really going on, just sit back with a cup of hot Ovaltine and play an action game called Battleship. Make all the war plans and put them in place without dragging us into another war where thousands of U.S. troops would die and get wounded. You won't even have to use the Iraq oil that you and repubs were going to use to pay for Iraq war. The game is only $10. Alright,...I just sunk your battleship...game over!
Like many of you guessers, I too think I know what the bomb delivery system will be. Pres Obama has kidnapped our nations top carpenters and has them.......(ssshhhhh don't tell anyone else)building a big wooden horse that is hollow inside. Plans to give this as a gift to Iran to have them display next to their nuke facility. Then later when everyone is asleep over there....BOOM!.....................No really ...he is...! I saw it on Fox news....it must be true!
David
I have always had the greatest respect for your postings, as I always seem to learn something new. As such, I had to go back and carefully reread your comments and mine, as you covered multiple postings in 7.12. In going back and carefully rereading the comment in question, I understand where your comment is coming from. Sometimes I have been known to type in a hurry and make off the cuff statements without really thinking about it. But I see your point. As it is, I retired in 1993 and they would not want me back for health reasons anyway. So I guarantee, it will most definitely be more than 3 months. By the way, I myself got caught up in Mr Bill's high tenure rules of the early 90's which stated tat as an E-6 with 20 years that had not made Chief Petty Officer (E-7), I had to go at 20. That suited me fine as me and Mr Bill's military did not see eye to eye anyway! Have a good day Sir.
Wow Ed, you could not make chief in 20 years. I made E5 in 3+ years and my brother made E9, in his 20+ year career. I think if you cannot make E7 in 20 years, you must lack the mental faculties to remain in the service. It was a good rule to get the dead wood out.
Ralph , if it makes you feel superior to make the riridiculous statement you just made, then it just further proves that you are not even worth responding to any further. You really have a problem and I pity you for it.
Bookworm12
I may have misstated myself in post #7 above. I was in no way advocating that Iran will target Israel first. I merely brought it up as a possibility, and sincerely hope that no country is attacked either with nuclear or conventional weapons as that would simply lead to even more unnecessary violence and huge numbers of deaths of innocents on all sides. I do thank you for bringing that to my attention though.
We just can't help being the bully of the world. I don't see us opening up area 51 for inspection. What hypocrites we are as a nation. We always know whats best for everyone in the world but are unable to run our own affairs in our own country. I'm not worried about Iran getting me killed I'm worried about my own Government getting us killed by sticking their noses in everyone business. We invite terrorist strikes upon us and at some point we will get what we deserve again.
Self loathing is ugly to see.
Dave-1593080 I agree Obama in incapable of letting this country run its own affairs. You will be worried when it costs $500 to fill up your gas tank. The minute that Iran makes any threat no tanker will get insurance and no oil will pass through the straits and you all will wish for $5.00 a gallon gas.
Can-it Squid...
Hey dum mass dave....you think we deserved 911? F U a$$wipe
bulldog I think dave lives on the left coast. We should do what I call Sunami War, you hear and feel the rumble and without notice everything in our path is wiped out.
Hey...........>>>I live on the left coast. Do you honestly think we weren't greatly affected by 9-11? Surely you must be unwell.
My grandaughter's best friend lost both her grandparent's on Flight 11.
Watch it there, bub. A really sensitive subject with me.
It does seem somebody should arm Iran with nuclear missiles for detente, certainly if anybody does premptive strike with hogwash against them.
I hope no one says anything hateful about gays or blacks. Good thing we still have the Jews to hate.
I don't hate them at all but I'm tired of their winning about the past. We have given them untold billions in military aid but still have to fight their battles.
what hate are you talking about!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if it's muslims in the first place, then you have the jews. Don't forget the gays, black, latinos immigartion status. it will never stop, because we love to HATE.
I think he was talking about neo-natzi rottweilerman above.
I too am sick of Israel having so much sway over US politics. They are an ally country, not the 51st state that we need to defend like it were our own soil. However, my opinions are not in anyway hateful (hell I'm married to a Jew after all).
Get Your history straight English Dude! What war did an American soldier fight in for Israel?
The six day war -- I don't think so -- just check with Johnson & McNamarra! Israel went solo despite the objections of the U.S.
The Yon Kippur War -- I didn't see any coffins coming back to the U.S. from that war either.
Just give Israel the 'toys' and they will take care of business for the benefit of the entire western industrialized world and humanity at large.
Kind of very different from your 'Iran Lady' diddling around in the Falklands, GWB being on a crusade, and Carter's humanitarianism that brought us the Ayatollahs and a bogged rescue mission.
Now, go sip your tea English dude and maybe you will come back to reality.
It's engineer, actually (as I pointed out above).
Secondly, the leverage that Israel has over our political dialogue is undeniable. We avow to support them if attacked. We provide them weaponry and billions in funding. We don't have to have already fought in a war for them in order to recognize our involvement has long since surpassed mere allies.
Further, you may have mentioned that we are discussing bombing Iran so that they don't have a nuke and pose a threat to Israel. What exactly about that is inconsistent with my above remark? Iran is unable to deploy a bomb to the US, so it isn't about defending US interests.
Are You an RPI alumni? BTW, I didn't know that engineers are esquires -- the engineers I know are generally really full of themselves. They are mathematically inclined and scientifically logical, but fail to realize in analyzing social & political issues that human beings are inherently selfish and power drunk.
Anyhow, in a world economy U.S. interests are no longer limited to the confines of our physical boundaries. Hitler couldn't reach U.S. territory, yet, his regime was a threat to the U.S. The Mullahs can't reach the U.S. by conventional means but they sure can reach it by sponsored terrorism. And, maybe we need to change our definition of terrorism and call government sponsored and/or supported acts, acts of war.
The Mullahs are destabilizing the entire Middle East, which also affects all of Europe. Both regions have been and are vital trading partners of the U.S.
Finally, it is infinitely cheaper and more effective for the U.S. to supply Israel with weapons, technology, and intelligence than to pay billions to Blackwater and other mercenaries. It is naive to believe and argue that the U.S. support of Israel has any significant financial impact on our economy and government debt.
EngEsq So many words and so little meaning. There are 5 million Jews in Israel and about 5 million in the U.S. The population of the U.S. is 335,000,000 where is the political leverage. The political leverage is over there, where they are our watchdog over our oil supply lines. The non floating battleship. All Iran has to do is put one mine in the water and no tanker will sail in or out of the straits and oil will go up to astronomical prices. You prefer to rely on Saudi Arabia to help open and keep oil and free of threats to the oil or would you prefer Israel. A lesson in economics is needed. There is a world wide price for oil. You close off the straits and all oil prices go up the same. Venezuelan oil, Canadian oil, U.S. oil, Uganda Oil, English Oil, Mexican Oil. And when you are paying $500 to fill up your gas tank who are you going to call for help?
After Iran puts mines in the straits and runs a few speedboats out, and has a nuclear device it can deliver to the Saudi and Kuwaiti oil fields to make them unworkable for the next 100 years, what are you going to do?
No one here has given this deep penetrating thought. The very second that Iran starts something, and there is not a coalition to immediately stop them, the price of oil skyrockets and all of Iran has to be dismantled, all the mines, all the speedboats, all the missiles, all the military power, nothing can be left to interfere with the tankers.
I am buying 50 drums of 50 gallons and filling every one up. With Obama in charge, no one knows how long this war is going to take and we only have between 30-60 days supply of oil in the reserves.
*sigh* Engineering degrees may be obtained in undergraduate. A law degree is a graduate level endeavor in the US. Patent attorneys need to have a science or engineering background in order to be a member of the USPTO.
Secondly, my analysis of social and political issues is most sound. I have routinely understood the dynamics of foreign policy far better than the average political commentator. But whatever, beleive whatever you wish.
Oh good god, you cannot be serious. First off, notice the kowtowing of the political crowd to the Jewish vote, and those that support Israel. Compare that to quantity and strength of the comments directed toward the latino population segment. Latinos are may times the size of the Jewish population, and yet have significantly less pull in Washington.
What are you smoking? Israel does nothing to protect our oil supply. Period. Economic self preservation and one of our carrier fleets takes care of that.
Mining the straight would be economic suicide to not only Iran, but Saudi Arabia and others. It would also severely piss of Russia and China. For these reasons alone the chances of them mining the straits is non-existent.
When have we ever fought Israel's battles?
Iran gets a nuke what makes you think they won't put one in a shipping container and ship it to nearest port in the US? They are no different than saddam barrack hussein. If he had small pox he would infect someone and send him on first flight to Israel...US. You infect everybody on the plane, at the airport departing and then every airport you drop people off at. Then the restaurants...cabbies, buses full of people, hotels...HOME.
These peopel are crazee nuts...they should be dealt with as such. Cut the head off the snake and world will be a better place.
ESQ....>>>>Israel is the only friend we have in the Middle east. Try not to forget that.
Bulldog, they won't even send one, its still suicide >.> You act like if some terrorist organization got it from them the world wouldn't be able to count its Nuclear arms stockpiles to figure out where the hole was. ONE NUKE will never end The United States, nor will 10... and they know that, so why play the paranoia figure? If they use it on Israel same thing happens, hell if anyone uses a nuke on this planet its end game for all, NO-ONE is that dumb. They may be an Islamic nation but they do have brains, and thus does much of their population. It's a lot to say in comparison to this country which does have specific minorities or groups with superior control of the political agenda. Its called a political machine, its an organization pushed for and funded by people with their own motive, scratch my back I scratch yours so to speak. American Politics is defined by it, population numbers don't matter when it comes to that.
So many people with so many strong opinions... So few with good grammar or any knowledge of spelling.
Bookworm your story sounds pretty good except for one thing, Iran is not dumb enough to start a war, which it knows it can not win. They are well aware of the fact they would be obliterated, were they to start a war. Iran can do all the things you say, but will not do them unless the US is dumb enough to do Israel's bidding and start the war.
As long as we keep the Republicans out of the oval office, America will be safe and oil prices will remain at a level we can afford.
The other danger is a false flag attack from Israel, designed to blame Iran. Israel will do just about anything to achieve their goal of a war, as proven by the false flag attacks on 9/11. The war with Iraq was the reason for that action. The neocons were calling for the US to attack Iraq on the day of the attacks.
This bomb was originally designed to take out Hippies... we know they are the REAL threat to America... just ask Nixon...
Bush advisor Wolfowitz said the Iraqi's would pay for the war... Bush advisor Rumsfeld said the war would last a few months...
After 4,400 dead Americans and over $1 Trillion in American dollars spent for what?
There are/were MUCH worse dictators running around than Saddam... oh, right, then there's the OIL.
Fox News -- Greenspan: Oil the Prime Motive for Iraq War
America's elder statesman of finance, Alan Greenspan, has shaken the White House by declaring that the prime motive for the war in Iraq was oil.
http://tinyurl.com/2726hs
Bush gives new reason for Iraq war
Says US must prevent oil fields from falling into hands of terrorists
http://tinyurl.com/9l3ru
In Iraqi War Scenario, Oil Is Key Issue
U.S. Drillers Eye Huge Petroleum Pool
http://tinyurl.com/ygckzh8
Wow, very good research. Our incursion into Iraq has really made gas cheaper!
Another gross miscalculation by that inept administration. They thought they'd be done in a matter of weeks, it wouldn't be costly, and the oil fields would be in good condition to start flowing rapidly.
Impotence in results does not obliviate the rational.
English Dude -- wake up! Ever heard of Blackwater? That is were the money went -- to mercenaries that became billionaires courtesy of the Chaney/Bush regime. That is not being inept but a redistribution of wealth from the many to a few.
Look Junior, the Iraq War was a heinous miscalculation, mismanagement and the reasons for it were fabricated.
Using privatized security forces was just one of the numerous mistakes made. Oil, an inferiority complex, and catering to the military industrial complex were all reasons for the war. Keeping Hussein's access to WMDs in check, or getting rid of a despot were not the real reasons.
Lastly it's engineer, not English.
Blackwater and dont' forget Halliburton, which Dick was a former CEO of, and who's stock went up ten fold!!! We made him rich and all it cost us was 15 trillion dollars and a few thousand dead soldiers. What a bargain.
What was the third reason that bin Laden gave for the attack on the world trade centers?
3.) America's embargo on Iraq. Go into Afghanistan to get the attackers and leave the back door open for the Iraqis to harass the U.S. GREAT THINKING! The next commander in chief of the armed forces for Obama.
You think Iraq would have harasses US forces in Afghanistan?!? WOW, you need some lessons in the political dynamics of pre-bush ME. Iraq leadership was none to fond of Al Quida, and was very concerned with self preservation. One thing you could count on from Saddam was extreme greed. He'd do anything to stay in power, and often was very rational in that regards.
Engaging the US in foreign territory where we were shooting people he didn't like would have not happened because it would jeapordize his power in his country.
EngEsq:
I don't understand this statement: Impotence in results does not obliviate the rational
I understand the "impotence in results does not" part, but "obliviate the rational" has me stumped. One can only surmise that way too many hours with Harry Potter may have had some type of negative impact on either the Eng part or the Esq part. It seems also that, possibly, rationale may have been a better choice than rational. A charm that causes one to forget is not a rational thought in most folk's lives, but, I would suppose, is an acceptable rationale for action, depending on the color of the sun on one's planet. Try spell checking "obliviate". Condescension is a nasty personality trait.
EngEsq
One of the 1st points you have made that I agree with.......Saddam was a pain to Iran and Al Quida and makes no sense why we went in at a cost of Trillions when we could have bought him for a few Billion.
I forgot an 'e', so sue me. I have done far worse in the past, and will continue to do so in the future. After all this is only a discussion board, and proofing takes too long.
As far as the rest of your post goes, you have a very obtuse means of getting to your point.
Ahem. I can see you are out your league here. I mean in a good way. You seem to have much more knowledge, experience and academic accomplishments here. I am having so much fun reading your comments. It is a clinic! But don't expect any of those idiots to agree with you even if you said the the sun is a planet, they would find explanations why it is not. But bear this in mind: "Never argue with fools. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."
keep trying anyways, if you get one to understand even one single thing, you would have accomplished far more than most have accomplished in a lifetime.
And they look at irrelevant things such as spelling. I would imagine that is more important than the substance of what you are saying.
"...oh, right, then there's the oil."
Where's the oil, then?
For you Zionists that claim the US has never fought a war for Israel, read these links. The Zionists planned and sold the war in Iraq and started their plan in 1996.
Here are 4 links which you war mongers can ponder, which will show how and why, the neocons, allied with Israel got the US into the war with Iraq and our present situation in Iran. They will show the unholy relationship between high ranking Zionist members of the Pentagon and the leadership of Israel.
http://www.rense.com/general29/perl.htm
http://www.serendipity.li/iraqwar/ignoble_liars.htm
http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_conc1.htm
http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_conc2.htm
I don't think Bush lied about thinking there were WMD in Iraq, after all, Bush's friends at Haliburton & Bechtel helped Iraq create them, like mustard gas.
Bush was probably dumbfounded at not finding any in Iraq... he probably had copies of the receipts for the WMD's in his desk, LOL!
I will guarantee that Israel will ask for more military aid for anti missile defence as well as our own military will cry that they need more money to counter the big bad Iranian's. Isn't it amazing how the Swiss mind their own business and prosper and no one wants to launch terror attacks against them.
Gee Dave...Ya think Swiss "are profitable and mind their own busines: are linked together? Something about ...Uhhhh...that is the country where all countries hide their money?.....Kinda small too ya think? Soooo you want more war asap, which will cost a lot of money, yet you would be upset if Israel and U.S. want more money for war.....?
The Jew bashing in some of the posts is incredible. I thought MSNBC drew a saner crowd. I don't want war with Iran for all the reasons outlined in the above posts. But, should our president decide an attack inevitable, I stand with America and Israel in deciding Iran is a real threat. Some of the posts actually seem like defenses of the indefensible ... Iran. Really, people?
You are correct, this IS the saner crowd..........kinda scary, ain't it?
You thought msnbc had a saner crowd? Where you been dude?
Saner than what, the crazies over on Fox News.
Been there, them people is absolutely nuts.
We wouldn't have all these problems if you had to be 21 to get a driver's license and it was $500 and $100 to renew every year. The 'car culture' should have died with the 60's and 70's. Driving should be a privilege of those who make a salary like it is in most modern countries.
Should we go back to the days of liege lords living in the castle behind the wall while the peasants labor at the whim of the wealthy as well? Maybe throw in a few dungeons for those peasants that get out of line? The only part of your post I can even remotely understand is the derision of the car culture, mass transportation should have been designed into the infrastructure of this country and all the major cities starting 40 or more years ago. But saying only the elites should have transportation options available to them?
To BIG TROUBLE.........In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand
At the mongrel dogs who teach
Fearing not I'd become my enemy
In the instant that I preached
sisters led by confusion boats
Mutiny from stern to bow.
Ah, but I was so much older then,
I'm younger than that now.
IF the US "gubmint" bombs Iran it is PROOF that this country, the USA, is RULED BY THE RICH who are the only ones who benefit by the military supply (aircraft, bombs, tech) being used offensively.
...and of course Iran is of no threat to anyone...they just like to hear themselves talk tough...saying things like "We will drive the Zionists into the sea." or my personal favorite " We will rid the world of the zionist pigs." Great huh? They truly are a loving people.
That's what you get when you threaten them with military resolve, politics 101 talk a big game always >.>
the US should use that bomb on their nuclear facilities, and also on the residences of their leaders.
get rid of them while the getting is good, and let the iranian people have some freedom for a change.
Many of you cohorts are saying we need to get rid of our President. Do you think Iran or N. K. should help us out. Maybe China or Russia could join and help.
I can't say as I blame the Iranians for wanting a nuke as that seems to be the only way to get our country to leave them alone. We have meddled in their affair for a hundred years now.
That's not working out too well for them, is it?
Iran wants the bomb to destroy Israel, either directly or by proxy.
One of the more sane comments I have read so far...well that is in addition to those of the EngrEsq.
anyone with any sense knows obama inherited the mess bush and the republicans made...
the economy ad job loss are not his fault. plus the republicans always stop him from doing anything just so they can say he didn't do this or that and does nothing.
also, obama has sent more cruise missiles and drone attacks than bush to eliminate specific targets and also he was the president that was in office when osama bin laden was killed.
when will people stop believing the garbage fox and the republicans keep spouting and use their brain and think for themselves?
regardless if he is a democrat, he has done as much as he can even with his hands being tied by republicans in congress and the senate blocking him continuously.
no, obama does not have a secret agenda, or going to do terrible things if he gets re-elected. that is all hype and nonsense from republicans to scare people.
republicans don't care about anything but money and corporations doing what they please, all while taking away the average americans rights and ruining the economy and country.
they are not job creators, unless dead end and part time jobs with no benefits are really jobs.
corporations can pay good salaries and benefits and still make profits, but its more important to make as much profit as they can and destroy the fabric of the country, while giving all that work and money to china and funding the chinese military and their one party system. they are communists, don't forget that.
so why do american companies give them all the jobs? its treason and apple is one of the biggest offenders, but people are still buying ipads and iphones and giving their money to china.
I have never seen a crowd of people unable to accept responsibility for their own actions like the Obama toady crowd.
Reagan 'inherited' a disaster from Carter. He never whined and complained about it.
Children blame others instead of accepting responsibility. Obama has been at the helm for almost 4 years. When will the toadies finally stop whining about Bush?
"regardless if he is a democrat, he has done as much as he can even with his hands being tied by republicans in congress and the senate blocking him continuously."
You realize, don't you, that for the first two years of this administration, the Dems had a super-majority and there was nothing the Repubs could have done to block them and they STILL did nothing.
"regardless if he is a democrat, he has done as much as he can even with his hands being tied by republicans in congress and the senate blocking him continuously."
You realize, don't you, that for the first two years of this administration, the Dems had a super-majority and there was nothing the Repubs could have done to block them and they STILL did nothing.
MikeH in Indy, do you realize that there is something called a Fillibuster that can be used to block legislation from being brought to the floor for a vote and it was the prime measure used by the republicant's during the first portion of President Obama's term. They said from the beginning of his term that their goal was going to be to make the President fail. That's working out pretty well huh? Anyway, stop reading talking points and look at the history of what has been happening over the last four years. Also the Democrats didn't have a Super Majority, just a majority. That's why they couldn't break the fillibusters....SMDH..
MikeH - Go back to school.
Speaker Boehner is doing just exactly what he was put there to do...stop obuttwipe and pelosi dead in their tracks till we get control of the Senate...fire that bum Reid, and fire that bum in the white house. Then we will start passing budgets again, doing the peoples work.
It is no wonder the democrat party has an ass for a mascot...they are all asses!
HOPE FOR CHANGE 2012 ABO
Neither party is amazing... Study their history, they were almost identical 150 years ago>.>
Dallas,
You wrote, "You realize, don't you, that for the first two years of this administration, the Dems had a super-majority and there was nothing the Repubs could have done to block them and they STILL did nothing." I don't agree with you. In the Senate, there were about 14 DINOS elected in conservative states that called themselves "Blue Dog" Democrats. They disfavored abortion, liked guns, and aligned themselves more often than not with the Republicans on economic and tax issues. They joined in the Republican filibusters, which was employed by Republicans at a rate unheard of in this Republic.
DINOS are not real Democrats, and the group elected in 2006 showed it. So, I respectfully disagree with your super-majority argument.
Yes Steven, Obama has been at the helm for almost 4 years and things have improved mightily in that time. Bush brought the stock market down to 6800, from 14000 and it is now around 13000. Our car companies are now making money, instead of closing their doors. Their workers and the workers of companies that provide parts to the auto makers are still in business, thanks to Obama.
Bin Laden is dead and we are out of Iraq, a war which will cost over 3 trillion dollars, that was financed with loans from China. Those loans aqnd the interest due, has been passed to Obama as a gift from Bush. Clinton left Bush a surplus and Bush left Obama a deficit and a downtrodden economy. Bush had full control of the Senate, House and Judiciary for 6 years. Obama only has a small majority in the Senate.
It seems Republicans like you, do not want to take responcibility for their actions. Hey, there were no WMD in Iraq. Also no mobile biological weapons trailors. I always get a kick out of that one. Imagine the fools believing that s-t.
Election year saber rattling and the NEED for an enemy... really? Are we truly in Orwell's 1984? Rather than Emanuel Goldstein to hate we have/had Osama or Saddam and now Mr. Member's Only jackets.
Dave,
Switzerland isn't located in the middle of countries that have attacked them, and not anywhere near a nation that has repeatedly stated that their intent is to wiper them off the face of the earth. History has shown us all that the only way Israel will survive is to have a stronger military than it's neighbors and to make certain that their neighbors know it.
Well. actually Nazi Germany tried to attack them. They couldn't find a way through the Alps in Switzerland to move their tanks.
Nothing put more fear in my heart than to think about my spouse going over seas to war. I just hope that the leaders of this country that order him to do that do it with a clear and concise plan. Having already went through the pain of staying at home while my spouse was in Iraq for a year, I know what it is like worrying if your loved one is going to come home or not. And then the heart breaking news when some don't. I do hope that this can be solved peacefully. Granted my husband signed up to serve this great country, with his life if needed, but as his wife, I prefer that he come home every night.
As the mother of a veteran, thank you for your service as well as your husband's. I hope as well that if it is decided to involve us in another war, those making that decision do so with clear and calm heads. God bless.
Drop the bunker buster.
Have a flight of four fighter bombers observe and when you see where the smoke is coming out, drop FAE's
End of nuclear site.
Then YOU pay for it, i'm out of tax money!
Don't worry, your rich "Uncle" will cover the expense.
only two nations on earth, have the aircraft lift capacity to deliver this bomb, united, states and russia, if we do not due it, the israel will use theit nuclear weapons; we have backed ourselves into a corner , the war-hawks in congress and the military will not be satisfied until the entire middle-east is at war, god help us.
Put the blame where in belongs: The Iranian theocracy.
Or rather on the US industrial war mob. Why are so many Americans- those who claim to be pro-life especially- addicted to the policy of killing large numbers of people?
DOU44,
This has been going on for as long as man kind has walked the earth. My advise to you would be to move to Iran if you dont like "the US industrial war mob". Iran will surely treat you with the hospitality you deserve.
To StevenB. How the hell is Iran responsible? Obviously you speak like a true teabaggin' republican. You them coming over here to try an change our regime? But I bet your Mormon wannabe Presidential hopeful would not try to impose his religious beliefs on the population? Or the idiot whose brain swigns just like a Pendulum?
LOl I honestly can't see a reason they're responsible. I mean think about it, we @!$%# on them not 70 years ago and tried to overthrow them >.>
If Israel can't let the holocaust go then Iran won't let our meddling go either, its life and humans hold grudges.
Iranians beat themselves bloody every year over the deaths of a religious leader that died centuries ago. Compared to that, the Israelis remembering the holocaust are only just getting started.
Irrelevant much? I see no connection in the two.
All the donkeys posting on here. I can't believe how ignorant, stupid, and are so really very uninformed they are. Can they read? Maybe, they just love to hear their hee-haws.
Enlighten us with your wisdom.
David, an immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan of all NATO forces, and civilians should have been given yesterday, last week, last month ... whenever. They don't have any war to be WON in Afghan. I want them out NOW! So, you can enlighten me on your wisdom donkey David, as why your commander-an-boychild wants to continue this war in Afghan. Is he a 'warmonger'? Busy writing apologizes to the murders of humans in cold blood, while are people are brought home in body bags? FDR, JFK, Ronald Reagan would never ever do this, or allow it to happen. Jimmy 'peanut farmer' Carter would not be able to speak for the rest of his life. Did that put some light on the horizon David?
Could it be perhaps that Obama is after the terrorists, the same terrorists that Bush declared war on, but never had the guts to attack, deciding instead on protecting his daddy's oil?
Demetrius...theres a hee-haw now! Some are jack-asses...all are dum masses!
WOAA, NOW WAIT JUSS A MINUTE Dere Andy! Ogutless our fearless Commandeer in chief is a War monger ?
How can that possibly be true? No , Say it ain't so ! He Won the " NOBEL P E A C E PRIZE didn't he?????
Liar, Liar pants on Fire !!! Somebody get a hose !
bulldog dude, I have no idea what planet you are from...... Oh Wait!!! The planet of Limbaughfoxhannity!!!
So far off in the galaxy that it will take Melania to reach any discernible Life.
If this is used, I hope it will be used ON israel.
Israel is the one who illegally posseses nukes...
Most americans, like myself, will support smacking iran only if israel is stripped off its nukes first.
Of course, israeli logic is , as always, twisted and pushes the boundaries of logic.
Example: UN presses for independednt Palesatine? Israel calls UN meaningless...
Yeah sure, UN was the one put them there in 1948. I honestly think That was meaningless....
Israel may or may not have nukes. Israel has never threatened anyone with annihilation.
Iran is actively pursuing nukes, to destroy Israel.
Israel has had to fight for her life no less than 7 times.
The Arabs had their chance for a "Palestinian" state in 1948. They chose war instead.
Steven, you are right. And, let's be blunt, Abdallah is a hater -- there are no human rights in Iran. The property of religious minorities is being confiscated without compensation just like the Nazi's did to the Jews.
The U.S. or Israel should hit Ghom, Isfahan, and Shiraz because these are the places of origin of iranian islamic fanaticism.
What?
israel is the only country in the world that has apartheid, and officially enforces racism...... You got to be out of your ffreaking mind(I doubt you have one)....
correction, steven israel has threatened the world with nukes via the samson option
JrSub
You are so uninformed that i do not know where to begin.
Iranian jews were offered 100,000$ on the top of 50,000$ all jews recieve to emigrate to Israel.hardly any of those 25000 Iranian jews took the offer.
The biggest real estate owner of my home town in Iran is jewish.he makes 20,000$ a day just from the rent he collects from his tenants.
Iranian people are among the most secular and educated in the world.
go watch "3 minutes trip to tehran" and "persian wedding" or "Tehran persian nights" on youtube then you would have some ideas about people of Iran.
Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said Russia is ... Iran over its nuclear program, warning that the consequences would be truly catastrophic.
Steven,
I assume you are a jew. denying that Isreal doesn't have the nukes is really B..sht.
read this article if you want to know more :http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/16/AR2006021601897.html
but still after reading it you will deny the truth...I won't be surprised.
Sirus & Abdallah & Ibrahim, you are white washing a racist, theocratic, mullah regime, most certainly because you derive monetary benefits from it.
I repeat, the Iranian government has confiscated without legal justification and without compensation the real property of thousands of members of religious minorities.
I agree with you that "Iranian people are among the most secular and educated in the world," but those are the Iranians that have left Iran over the last 30-35 years. The mullahs that run today's iranian government are decibels of the Hitler regime: they are murderers, habitual liars, thiefs, racists, sexist, have no tolerance for other religions, and pose a threat to all nations because of their global ambitions to export their brand of irrational islam.
Yes, Israel has the bomb but Israel hasn't threatened to wipe other nations of the face of the earth.
And please somebody show me the history of your alleged Palestinian state. Exactly, no such sovereign state, constitution, parliament, or currency ever existed. The Palestianian question is a question of hate deliberately and artifically created by the Arab nations surrounding Israel. Rational people do not live in camps for some 60 years plus for the sake of pretending that they are refugees.