One decade, one ruling: Hague war crimes court to finds Congo warlord guilty

Evert-Jan Daniels / Pool via EPA

Former Congolese rebel commander Thomas Lubanga sits in a court room the International Criminal Court in the Hague, the Netherlands, on Wednesday.

Updated at 10:37 a.m. ET: THE HAGUE -- The Hague international war crimes court found Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga Dyilo guilty in its first ruling on Wednesday after a decade of work.

Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, 51, was detained six years ago and faced charges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) over a 1998-2003 war, when tens of thousands were killed. He was accused of among other things of sending children into battle.


The trial lasted more than 2 1/2 years and was halted twice. Prosecutors and defence lawyers called dozens of witnesses. Among them were victims of crimes, technical experts and Lubanga's former colleagues.

Lubanga said during his trial he was a politician who had no power over the Patriotic Forces for the Liberation of the Congo (FPLC), the armed militia of the Union of Congolese Patriots which Lubanga headed and to which he is accused of conscripting children younger than 15 to fight.

Prosecutors took several years longer than planned to complete preparations for the Lubanga trial.

Lubanga could face up to life imprisonment, although sentence will not be passed immediately. An appeal can be filed within 30 days.

U.N. Human Rights chief Navi Pillay on Wednesday hailed the verdict as "a great step forward for international justice and a major milestone in the fight against impunity."

Lubanga's conviction could help lend momentum to other prominent cases, such as that against former Ivory Coast president Laurent Gbagbo. Gbagbo is charged with individual responsibility on counts of crimes against humanity -- murder, rape and other forms of sexual violence, persecution, and other inhuman acts.

Reuters and msnbc.com staff contributed to this report.

More from msnbc.com and NBC News:

 

Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

Discuss this post

Now they need to do the same thing to Bush/Cheney, hehe.

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:08 AM EDT

That was my first thought as I began reading this article. When will the international community place the Cheney/Bush crew on trial for its illegal, immoral, unjustified invasion of the sovereign nation of Iraq? When will the citizens of Iraq sue the citizens of the United States for one trillion dollars ($1,000,000,000,000.00) for invading and murdering its citizens under false pretenses? The United States surrendered its moral conscience under Republican leadership; certain, to go down in the history books as another black period in America's past.

  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:32 AM EDT

Why do we never see people who sell weapons to these dictators go to jail. Heck we don't even see their names!

  • 3 votes
#2.2 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:50 AM EDT

Yeah, good luck with that. Starting a questionable (or, if you prefer, unquestionably wrong) war wouldn't land him in the ICC, even if the US were part of it.

Not saying he does or doesn't deserve it, but it's a pointless fantasy.

    #2.3 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:45 AM EDT

    why patronize them, feed them & even deal with them..take them Out, or send them to the gallows, Asap....

      #2.4 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:25 PM EDT
      Reply

      It took a decade to conduct one trial?

      Big government on an international scale. Get us out of the UN...it ever there was a worthless organization, this is it.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#3 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:10 AM EDT

      It took ten years but at least they did something. The alternative? Nobody does anything and Dyilo is not held accountable. The US helped found the UN and is on the permanent security council, we're not getting out.

        #3.1 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:05 AM EDT

        No kidding I have to agree. Although I don't think we should get out of the UN. We just need cut way back on Funding them.

        The U.S. is assessed 22 percent of the UN’s regular budget and 27 percent of the UN’s peacekeeping budget. (However, an outdated Congressional mandate caps U.S. expenditures at 25 percent of the UN’s peacekeeping budget.) Currently, over 70 percent of the UN’s total assessed budget is spent on peacekeeping, and since no mission can operate without the United States’ vote in the Security Council, this means that the U.S. directly determines a majority of the UN’s assessed budget.

        http://www.unausa.org/unfunding

        Other nations need to pick up more of the UN's tab.

          #3.2 - Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:31 PM EDT
          Reply

          Better a decade and show this scum a lifetime in prison than a blind eye to his crimes.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#4 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:30 AM EDT

          One animal down, a bunch to go.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#5 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:30 AM EDT

          Now it is time to go after the biggest of all war criminals, Richard Bruce "Dick" Cheney, Slick Willie, Baby Bush and Daddy Bush, and the Nobel Peace Prize winner who just recently announced that he intends to start killing American citizens without trials or due process, and his attorney general who supports such crimes against humanity.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#6 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:38 AM EDT

          A bullet is so much cheaper, and allows everyone to find solace much quicker, so why parade around these mockeries of justice, just to say "we're civilized"?

          Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth... and pretty soon all of this human-excrement would be wiped-clean (pun intended).

            Reply#7 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:39 AM EDT

            Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth

            How does that make us any better than them?

            An eye for an eye eventually leaves everyone blind.

              #7.1 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:10 AM EDT

              In all fairness, he did much, much worse than simply kill someone in an act of questionable justice.

              Getting referred to the ICC requires so much evidence of wrongdoing, it's pretty much a conviction in and of itself.

                #7.2 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:39 AM EDT
                Reply

                wow...people see a horrible evil person that goes around selling child sex slaves, murdering babies, and having his soldiers raping CHILDREN finally get held accountable, and all you can freaking say is "now they just need to get bush, cheney, hahaha"

                that is just...i don't even have words to describe how moronic that is.

                you have this guy, in the Congo, slaughtering whole villages and commiting unthinkable, atrocious, violent crimes (raping BABIES for god's sake!) and that's all you can even say?

                i have one question:

                what in the HELL is wrong with you??!!!

                  Reply#11 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:36 AM EDT
                  Reply

                  Well, better late than never.

                    Reply#12 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:38 AM EDT

                    you can not even imagine the hell this man has caused. to even try and compare him to any former american president or vice president is really disturbingly stupid.

                    i know our politicians are evil, through and through.

                    but these political leaders in africa, THAT'S A WHOLE DIFFERENT LEVEL. how can you not see that?

                    can you see Bush, Obama, Cheney, ANY of them drugging children and forcing them to murder their parents? selling baby girls as sex slaves to trade for weapons, drugs, etc.? raping babies in front of their mothers?

                    i'm not looking for a slimely little quip. i am asking you honestly. and of course, the answer is NO.

                      Reply#13 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:40 AM EDT

                      It would be nice to see him face the same fate as his victims suffered.

                      How can you even compare what this scum has done to the people of his country to our country's leaders? I don't see that any of them have conscripted children for war orraped women, children and babies at will. This man was pure evil! While our leaders may have an evil streak they are at least human. I agree with you Lizzaayy.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#15 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:12 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      Does any one know when the Hague war crimes court will be talking with Bush and Chaney????????? OH! I forgot Bush lawyers says they were not war crilmes. To bad the congo warlord didn't have Bush's lawyer.

                        Reply#17 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:07 PM EDT

                        yeah because Cheney and Bush raped babies and sold child sex slaves, drugged children then had them murder their parents, slaughtered whole villages dozens and dozens and dozens of times.

                        you sir, are an imbecile.

                        there is no way you will ever even be able to compare the crimes committed by former american leaders to the atrocities and sheer volume of horrific dehumanizing slaughter of the african people by their own presidents, tyrants, and dictators.

                        • 1 vote
                        #17.1 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:13 PM EDT

                        by the way, ALL american politicians have been criminals one way or another. yet i see you omitted any democrats from your short, close minded list.

                        how bout you take your head OUT of your ass?

                        • 1 vote
                        #17.2 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:17 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        Justice(?)

                          Reply#21 - Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:19 AM EDT

                          The international court has been very sloooooooow, but I am glad they finally got this conviction, and wish them luck and speed in the future.

                            Reply#22 - Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:09 AM EDT

                            Too bad it took so long - wheels of justice need to speed it up a bit.

                              Reply#23 - Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:57 PM EDT

                              If you are going to sucker people into the "humane" treatment of criminals by not executing them, can you at least put them in a prison where they have no chance of reaching a "natural" death through old age? People (Governments without a pair) waste so much money housing, feeding and treating people that are no longer of any use outside a prison cell. Just put a bullet in their head and drop them in the jungle for the animals to dispose of. Not like this guy deserves to be treated kindly after what he's done.

                                Reply#24 - Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:31 AM EDT
                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.