E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSSA British businessman has discovered what could be the earliest piece of Andy Warhol's 'Pop Art' ever found.
A British businessman has discovered what could be the earliest piece of Andy Warhol's "Pop Art" ever found.
An art expert told the U.K.'s ITN that the $5 bargain could be worth millions, if it's authenticated.
Channel 4 News in the U.K. reported that the painting was bought by Andy Fields, of Devon, in Las Vegas, from a drug user whose aunt cared for Warhol as a child. It said the picture had been valued at more than $2 million.
Warhol was supposed to have made the work when he was just 10 or 11 in the 1930s, Channel 4 said.
NBC News partner ITN in London contributed to this report.
More from msnbc.com and NBC News:
- Plane carrying 43 crashes in Siberia, Russia
- UK slams Argentina 'harassment' over Falklands
- 675 fishermen rescued from runaway ice floe in Russia
- Shark cull demanded after fatal attacks in Australia
Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world
Leave a Comment:
$5 from a drug user? This guy is scum for taking advantage of the weak.
Nonsense. 1st-- it was concealed when purchased no one could have guessed what was there, 2nd-- the junkie stole it anyway(they steal everything), 3rd-- 'the weak' self destruct on and waist all money they touch. Finder saved the junkies life!
Sure, let the junkie shoot $2 million in his arm, or snort it up his nose. Advantage of the weak? What a laugh.
I have an original toilet roll that Warhol wiped his butt with. Any takers?
$5! Thats more than I would pay for it.
I have a copy of "Amy Vanderbilt's COMPLETE COOKBOOK" that contains illustrations by Andrew Warhol; copyright 1961 by Amy Vanderbilt; printed by Doubleday.
I will sell this for a few million.
Seriously, does anyone know if this is a valuable book? The recipes aren't very good, but he drawings are cool.
That is worth 2 million? Those people are nuts. It looks like $5 no matter who did it.
Five dollars? He paid too much. Looks like something my kid did in third grade art class.
If it is a Warhol, it's a significant find, but you're not smart enough to know that.
Stick to your area of expertise and keep collecting dried cow patties... maybe they'll be worth something one day.
Warhols crap never did anything for me either. The druggie got a good deal as far as I'm concerned
If it is a Warhol, it's a significant find, but you're not smart enough to know that.
This jink only has value because ignorant elitist fools will pay for it. All it takes is for a few socialites to comment on it and then the 'poser" egotists jump on it.
Its junk!
(((I find many of these posts quite entertaining))) It is worth millions IF that's what some one will pay for it. "Elitist fools"??? Curious how it is the current fad to disrespect elites--Really we DO WANT ELITES representing us at the Olympic Games, running our Corporations, and yes--even representing us in the White House.....none of us benefit when Joe 6-pack takes the helm including Mr. Beer Belly. As for ppl whom appreciate art, perhaps some of you should try to understand what it is that some 'elites' see that you don't?
andy warhol was a fake artist. he just took photos of people & changed a few colors around & printed his art. what he did is what screen printers do every day in america.
And you do not consider the graphic design of screen printers to be art? Graphic design wouldn't be where it is today without the works of Warhol and alike. You may not like his work, but there is no denying that it is art and was of major significance to what has followed since.
You really don't know what you're talking about.
If he was actually a fake, then he still should be recognized as one of the greatest and most influential fakes in the history of modern times. Even if he intended to pull one over on everyone, he did so and still managed to change how art was and how it would ever be looked at again. I find it hilarious that he's "doing the same this any old screen printer does today" yet no screen printer today has even 1/1000th the importance to the art scene as Warhol did at his time. It's been said that Warhol's best piece of art was Warhol himself...and even if that's the case, it doesn't change the fact that his art changed art forever.
Ah, the never-ending 'art vs. not art' debate.
Now that's funny! It appears you have (unwittingly?) gotten the point. And guess what? Warhol would totally agree with you. Have you ever considered being an art critic?
Romney is to Presidential what atch-a-sketch is to Art!
I had a friend got a wizzard of oz picture back from her ex for a bag of weed now worth many bags
Where would Campbell's Soup be today if it wasn't for Andy Warhol?
The same place they are in the market today. A leader in soup sales.
Exactly!
For an icon, he sure was a pretty talentless fellow. Oh well, to each their own, The art world is filled with pretentious C's.
Pretentious cats?
Close enough :)
pretentious cookie-monsters?
I think you should take your own advise about not commenting on things, of which, you know very little.
Warhol was not Andy Warhol's birth name. Warhola was the name he was born with and I can't find any record of him dropping the "a" until he was in college. Seems strange that this drawing which would have been done when he was 11 would be signed "Warhol". I am no expert but this casts serious doubt on the drawing's authenticity in my mind.
This is correct...it's BS, he was Warhola until after he wasn't doing ad art. Pittsburgh native I recall.
Cops should seize that picture for being part of a drug conspiracy... surprised they already haven't.
2.5 million??? That's a whole lot of Campbells Soup.
This just goes to show you that this news station will put anything online. I know for a fact that the Warhola Family thought this drawing was an absolute fake, not even close to what Warhol would have done when he was a kid. There is no record of who he got it from but yet he says its real and he has an expert saying so. Apparently this man has the means to sell this ‘fake’ even when he was told it was not real from the Warhola family.
Well face it, that's what Andy would have done, he was nothing if not a businessman. Maybe not a "real" artist, but colorful and creative and savvy to the market.
You just described Yoko Ono.
Even if it is by Warhol. Are we really gonna say it is a piece of his artwork? If he did it when he was ten, I mean its a good drawing of some guys head. But thats about it. And worth millions of course.
Warhol's work is terrible
$2 million? Wish I had that much to splurge on a drawing . I would offer $5.50 to the new owner and hang it above my toilet as it does look like a younger lighter version of Obama, ears and all.
And everybody is believing the story of a druggie?? Ever think he sits in some run down hotel room with a box of crayons making pictures to sell for $5 each telling whatever story he can come up with to sell them?
Yeah..even if it's a real Warhol..its from his pre-pub period..no value as art..worth maybe 5 bucks...
That's even better than striking first prize at the best online bingo sites. Heck, maybe I should also start scavenging for rare treasures like these too. $_$