BRUSSELS - NATO air strikes killed 72 civilians in Libya last year, Human Rights Watch said on Monday, accusing the western alliance of failing to acknowledge the scope of collateral damage it caused during the campaign that helped oust Moammar Gadhafi.
In a report based on investigations at bombing sites during and after the conflict, the New York-based HRW said NATO strikes killed 20 women and 24 children. It called on the alliance to compensate civilian victims and investigate attacks that may have been unlawful.
June 2011: Libyan officials claim that a NATO strike killed seven people in Tripoli. NBC's Stephanie Gosk reports.
"Attacks are allowed only on military targets, and serious questions remain in some incidents about what exactly NATO forces were striking," Fred Abrahams, special adviser at HRW, said in a statement.
The report claims to be the most extensive investigation to date of civilian casualties from NATO's air campaign and presents a higher death toll estimate than a March paper by Amnesty International which documented 55 civilian deaths, including 16 children and 14 women.
NATO considers its Libya operation highly successful, illustrating the allies' ability to work well together in a limited campaign. NATO carried out some 26,000 sorties including some 9,600 strike missions and destroyed about 5,900 targets before operations ended on October 31.
The alliance said the campaign had been conducted with "unprecedented care and precision and to a standard exceeding that required by international humanitarian law".
"NATO did everything possible to minimize risks to civilians, but in a complex military campaign, that risk can never be zero," said NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu in a statement.
"We deeply regret any instance of civilian casualties for which NATO may have been responsible."
NATO: Gadhafi using mosques, children's parks as shields
HRW acknowledged that NATO had taken care to minimize civilian casualties and added that countries such as Russia that had made claims of large-scale civilian deaths did so "to score political points".
But Abrahams, principal author of the report, said the care NATO took during the campaign was "undermined by its refusal to examine the dozens of civilian deaths."
Concerns about civilian deaths in Libya could hamper NATO's ability to carry out future operations outside the territory of its members, in North America and Europe.
Although Russia co-sponsored the U.N. resolution authorizing intervention in Libya, it later said NATO had "grossly violated" its mandate. This was a factor earlier this year when Russia opposed a U.N. resolution calling for action to stop the violence in Syria.
HRW highlighted an attack on the village of Majer, 160 km (100 miles) east of Tripoli on August 8, when NATO air strikes on two family compounds killed 34 civilians and wounded more than 30.
HRW said NATO had told it that the Majer compounds were a "staging base and military accommodation" for Gaddafi forces, but had not provided specific information to support that claim.
"During four visits to Majer, including one the day after the attack, the only possible evidence of a military presence found by Human Rights Watch was a single military-style shirt - common clothing for many Libyans - in the rubble of one of the three destroyed houses," it said.
NATO said it had now looked into each credible allegation of harm to civilians and confirmed that the targets struck "were legitimate military targets, selected in a manner consistent with the U.N. mandate".
More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:
- Now towering over London: 'The Godzilla of public art'
- France's 'Monsieur' Normal takes office ... unmarried
- Too busy to put the kids to bed? Try 24-hour daycare
- Outrage over anti-Muslim materials in military training
- 88,000-mile voyage? Plastic card found after 33 years
- Bad neighbors for Team USA? Occupy camp axed
Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world
Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

nato is nothing more than arm of the united states ( in charge of nato) led by the zionist policy makers in the state department.
The israeli hawks in the us government wanted so badly to help israel that they used the "protection of libyans" as an excuse to go in and kill Qaddafi. They didn't care about innocent civilians and Arabs in general. All they care about is destroying Libya so israel would have one less foe and the amerikans can steal oil from Libya at below market prices.
This same thing was tried again on Syria. China and Russia sooooooo figured this trick out that they went against ANYTHING the u.s. proposed just because they got hoodwinked last time. Look at what happened. Libya had 52 univiersities and higher learning institutes which are now RUBBLE.
This RUBBLE DIPLOMACY with crocodile tears for the population is never going to work again. The israeli hawks in the u.s. will have to find a different way of achieving the goal of the serpent engulfing everything from the euphrates to the nile. Google that if ou don't know what I mean. Also google TALMUD to see more about what drives these evil people and their sick beliefs.
Folks, DONT vote for the destruction of Syria now that you know what happened. Stand by your fellow man/woman and insist on a FAIR solution and not just destroying Syria. I actually don't think that's possible but the u.s. is audacious enough and evil enough to try ....
After the conflict was over ower prime menister of canada held a military prade for his blood thirsty pilets and gave them a metal what kind of humans are they==coyote
..as if it's a surprise?
"There are two kinds of people in the world: the righteous and the unrighteous. The righteous do the classifying."
NATO will never have a member nation or military personnel prosecuted for crimes against humanity, no matter what their forces do, because NATO controls the system for prosecution.
In a war that took the lives of 12,000 plus in only eight months, I'd say they done good. They'd still be fighting if it wasn't for NATO...wait, no, all the men of Benghazi would have been lined up and shot and the rest of the rebellious sorts would have been gassed. I salute you NATO, world dictatorial police force, for doing something which saved lives.
Well, NATO has more precise weapons, you can't expect that accuracy from Syria or any other third world regime.
AS always they claim when they kill innocents they say their doing it to save lives , just like the US did when it dropped the bombs , It may be true but the method still sucks .