WikiLeaks' Assange, trapped in embassy, says Ecuador 'quite supportive'

Oli Scarff / Getty Images

Embassy staff serve coffee to members of the media waiting for Julian Assange outside the Ecuadorian embassy on Friday in London. Julian Assange, the founder of the WikiLeaks whistle-blowing website, has sought refuge in Ecuador's London embassy to prevent him from being extradited to Sweden on allegations of rape and assault.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Friday said he was ready for a life in Ecuador and said the country had been "quite supportive" of his bid for asylum.

Assange is holed up in Ecuador's embassy in London, England, where he has sought asylum in a bid to avoid extradition to Sweden where he is wanted for questioning on sexual assault charges.


He faces arrest by British police if he leaves the embassy.

In a telephone interview with Australian Broadcasting Corpation radio from the embassy, Assange said he was concerned about being sent to the United States to face possible charges related to the WikiLeaks website, which published thousands of leaked U.S. diplomatic cables in 2010.

"The Ecuadorean people have been quite supportive. I heard (the) Ecuadorean Ambassador in Australia has been making supportive comments. They are sympathetic over a long period of time," he said.

Facundo Arrizabalaga / EPA file

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrives at the Supreme Court in London Feb. 2.

"We hope the asylum application will be viewed favorably. Now it's is a matter of gathering extensive evidence of what is happening in the U.S. and submitting that with a formal request,” he added.

Assange said he had no indication of when Ecuador would decide on his asylum claim, and said his move was aimed at raising awareness of U.S. moves to prosecute him over the 2010 leaks.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange seeks asylum in Ecuador

He fears that if sent to Sweden, he would then be extradited to the United States where he believes he could face criminal charges punishable by death.

He said he was not running away from questioning over sexual assault allegations in Sweden, but said the Swedish prosecutors had refused to visit him in Britain or contact him by phone.

"This issue is about a very serious matter in the United States," he said, adding Swedish authorities said he would be detained on arrival in Sweden.

Assange said his case was currently before a U.S. grand jury, which would decide whether charges could be laid. He said U.S. authorities have been careful not to confirm or deny any grand jury investigation.

"There are subpoenas everywhere. We have received subpoenas, there are subpoenas in my name," he said, adding people have been detained at U.S. airports and been questioned by the FBI and asked to become informers.

Assange also hit out Australia for not taking stronger action to protect him, saying he had no consular contacts since December 2010 apart from telephone text messages.

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard has said Assange has received more consular support than anyone in a similar position, while Attorney-General Nicola Roxon said Australia has regularly made representations about Assange to authorities in the U.S., Sweden and Britain.

"It is an effective declaration of abandonment," Assange said.

More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

He is acting like a scared little child.

  • 3 votes
#1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:00 AM EDT

This guy is revealed for what he is, again. He is not interested in some sort of legal, vetted, truth. What he is, is an enemy, and he allies himself with other enemies. Not out of some just cause. But because he is an angry, spiteful, partially delusional spoilt brat with a computer. So, you can see that when push comes to shove, he does exactly what any coward would do, instead of actually facing the music. Of course, all his bold talk is pure BS.

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:24 AM EDT

Derek, you are 100% wrong. He knows the playing field is tilted. You have been brainwashed to believe and support a murderous Gov't which is the biggest threat to life on earth. He has the guts, and hopefully some luck to speak truth to power. Giving up one's freedom and possibly life so that future generations may live in peace with one another is a noble cause.

Ask yourself why all of the Gov't actions are being declared "top secret" in the name of National security?Ask yourself why we need drones spying on us in the U.S?

Pretty soon there won't be any forums to share your opinion on the "news" because all news will be censored in the name of "National security".

Good luck with your bold talk about people who are actually willing to risk something to get the truth out.

  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:47 AM EDT

As I have said before. Assange is a criminal, a liar, and now a craven coward trying everything he can to avoid justice. As Ecuador is aligned with Hugo Chavez and Venezuela, is this any surprise? I'm surprised Hugo himself did not openly jump on the band wagon!

  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:50 AM EDT

Ed-NavDoc: Who are the criminals, liars, and cowards? Our whole Gov't now does whatever they please in the name of National security. False-flag events to further erode our constitutional rights.
It's funny how folks always like everything black and white so it is easy for them to "understand, accept, and then speak about it".
Why is it OK for one faction (the U.S. gov't) to kill innocents in countries that don't accept western corporations and banks on their soil, yet when someone catches the U.S. with their pants down, they are criminals, liars, and cowards?
Your view on the world, and how we should interact with our fellow humans seems to stop at the end of your nose.

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:32 AM EDT

I am entitled to my opinion, just as you are entitled to yours. Have a good day.

  • 4 votes
#1.5 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:43 AM EDT

I am entitled to my opinion, just as you are entitled to yours. Have a good day.

    #1.6 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:44 AM EDT

    Sorry for the duplication. Don't know how that happened.

      #1.7 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:46 AM EDT

      Ed- We are entitled to our opinion except where the law is concerned. The U.S. gov't has clearly violated the constitution and international law.

      As I said, people like everything black and white to feel better. The role our gov't plays in creating poverty, wars, and corporate abuses of national sovereignty is criminal.

      • 2 votes
      #1.8 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:09 PM EDT

      @ Stone Mason . . . . You have got to be kidding.

      What you stated has to be the worst excuse ever made for anyone ever accused of anything " Ever ". The man is a coward. If he has done nothing wrong like he says, he should face the charges and take his chances. What other place on earth would he have a better chance to draw attention to the issues then in a USA court room. Yet, this guy hides in a castle, and now an embassy.

      Giving up one's freedom and possibly life so that future generations may live in peace with one another is a noble cause.

      This is so laughable ! The only thing "Future generations" need to worry about are more self aggrandizing people like this in the world. I am sorry, but the fate of the world does not rest in this guy hands. . . . . . Thank God !

      As far as this idiot statement . .

      "actually willing to risk something to get the truth out."

      What risk has this guy taken for anyone other then himself ? Everything thing this guy says and does is about one thing, Him.

      • 4 votes
      #1.9 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:36 PM EDT

      Roger you are a fool. Keep believing all the propaganda. You are brainwashed.

      The risk he took was his life being threatened to expose the truth about The U.S. gov't and military being murderers and consistently violating the constitution.

      You are another example of people here wanting everything black and white so you can understand it and flap your jaw so you can feel good about your insignificant existence.

      At some point, you need to ask yourself how many innocent people have to die so the U.S. gov't can continually take you constitutional rights away from you and lie to you the whole time. Meanwhile you sit at your keyboard and run your mouth about how great you are and what an idiot others are who clearly demonstrate that they are more informed than you. Good luck with your ignorant life. You deserve it.

      Blind faith in your Gov't will get you killed - Bruce Springsteen

      • 3 votes
      #1.10 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:12 PM EDT

      Stone Mason, are you an actual Mason? Just curious, no judgement.

        #1.11 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:28 PM EDT

        Yes I am.

        • 2 votes
        #1.12 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:46 PM EDT

        Firsts, Please quote where I said how great I am .. learn to read, perhaps learn to spell too. You are the one running your mouth, not me. Me brainwashed, hardly. You are the same type of idiot the story is about.

        I did not ask that coward to risk anything for me. No one asked him to police the world. Julian Assange has no one to blame for his situation other then himself. This would all be a bit more news worthy if he was a USA citizen, but he is not. Why should I even care what he says or does. Talk about sitting at a computer, what does your hero do ? He hacks and cracks and then releases classified documents and makes value judgments from a desk in some unknown place, nice guy right ? Puts lives at risk by doing so, again... nice guy right ? When this guy pays taxes and has voting rights, then perhaps he can help decide for the rest of us what policy should be. But until then, he is no one to decide for me anything. He has no rights on my future or that of my kids and grandkids. To my knowledge he has never held an elected office and is generally known to be a bumbling fool as an ex-hacker, a lamer one hacker called him. In my mind you are worse then he is. The defender of the fool is more foolish. If you do not like our government , vote to change it. Having Julian Assange trying to do it for you makes you a coward too. Perhaps you have voted and it changed nothing . . . well guess what, that's how the system works... love it or leave it. There is nothing you or anyone can say that will change the fact the guy is a coward, get over it. And by the way, the only thing you demonstrate was not how informed you are sir, but how missed informed and jaded you are. Have a nice day :)

        • 4 votes
        #1.13 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:54 PM EDT

        Roger, ever notice how frequently when someone is on the weak side of an argument or discussion, as with Stone Mason, the first thing they do is throw insults out when trying to get their point across

        • 4 votes
        #1.14 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:42 PM EDT

        Roger, I've actually testified in front of the general assembly of my home state for labeling GMO's. I'm a farmer, stone mason, and grow my own food. I've traveled all over the world, and worked in other countries. I've constructed over thirty houses in my life, and am a former professional athlete. I've coached athletes who have won medals at the Olympics.

        You sit and judge others without the facts. That's what made me say you think you are great. Your actions spoke it, not specifically the organization of your words.

        "Perhaps learn to spell"? Grasping at straws now?

        What is there really to say to someone who doesn't understand why he released the information that was actually given to him by someone in the U.S. military? Is it possible these people knowingly put themselves at risk so people could be aware of them and make their own conclusions?

        Did George Washington ask for your opinion to fight the British so the founders could write the constitution and the bill of rights? How foolish you sound when you say I didn't ask him to do anything for me. with your logic, if you didn't ask for the constitution, you don't want it.

        Most of the world doesn't want the U.S. to police the world. They do it to cover for the corporations forcing the poorer countries to give up ownership of their natural resources. Starting wars in countries like Syria, bombing civilians in the name of "freedom", etc etc.

        Defender of the fool? You are the fool Roger. The lack of any facts in your argument makes it pretty obvious. I never said or implied Assagne was doing anything "for me", I just expressed my appreciation for ANYONE willing to stand up to Ultra-powerful organizations.

        As for me being a coward, that's humorous. If you met me, the last thing you would call me is coward.

        I noticed you haven't addressed the fact you don't know the international laws applying to this case yet you already have made your judgement. Please do. I can't wait to see how you squirm out of this one.

        • 2 votes
        #1.15 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:49 PM EDT

        Actually Ed, I was using the same terminology as Roger when he judged Julian, without knowing the facts or the person. If you actually were interested in the conversation, you would respond to the facts I've provided and the lack of on your parts.

        • 1 vote
        #1.16 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:57 PM EDT

        Sorry to disagree with you again Stone Mason, but I read the above statements very carefully and nowhere did I find that Roger called you a coward personally. He was referring solely to Assange. You, however insulted him and resorted to name calling.

        As for being interested in the conversation, I will respond to facts when presented with such. So far you have provided only insults, conjecture, and innuendos. I have attempted to be polite with you thus far, however you seem to be bent on straddling or outright crossing the line on Newsvine COH violations regarding personal attacks. You might want to rethink your position on that.

        • 3 votes
        #1.17 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:43 PM EDT

        Actually I have not come close. If you are a mod, whaaaa. I never said he called me a coward. He called Julian a coward. I stated that clearly. So how you missed that, i can only guess.

        If you can't decipher what facts I've stated I would have to say you may want to check if you have a pulse.

        The constitution has clearly been violated. It is illegal to start wars without congressional approval. That is a fact. I clearly stated several times the constitution has been violated. You have not responded. So, you are wrong. Avoiding facts is not a conversation. It is an exercise in burying your head in the sand.

        I called him foolish. And yes he did call me a coward. Look harder. Clown.

        • 2 votes
        #1.18 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:55 PM EDT

        Thank you for continuing to prove my point!

        • 3 votes
        #1.19 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:21 PM EDT

        He's not a US citizen and he disclosed information given to him by a US military personal. So take his life? There are terrorist and news organizations world wide that disclose any information they can get their hands on regardless of what's classified. This guy coulda gone to whoever he wanted to get the information out there. Take Manning's head off for treason if that's what your all wanting is blood, but bring Assange here to trial and killing is wrong.

        • 1 vote
        #1.20 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:02 PM EDT

        Ed-NavDoc: "I will respond with facts when presented with such"

        Stone Mason: "It is illegal to start wars without congressional approval. That is a fact"

        Ed-NavDoc: "Thank you for continuing to prove my point.

        Ed-NavDoc, I am concerned for the state of your mental well-being in ways that I cannot describe.

        • 1 vote
        #1.21 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:35 PM EDT

        Mr. Miller, please save your unwanted and unwarranted concern for someone who needs it. I don't. Then try carefully rereading the above posts.

        • 1 vote
        #1.22 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:06 PM EDT

        I love stupidity, and here in America we sell it by the butt load. Would Sweden extradite him to the US? YES. Is having sex with 2 different women really a crime? NO. Just bogus charges so the US can get their hands on him, and show the world how we really feel about "Whistleblowers", inside the fine world of backstabbing Consular's in our Embassies around the world.

        I love how you "Proud" Americans are shocked that he is a traitor for showing me (A former vet) that indeed our country lies to its people by telling me that a journalist was killed by terrorists, when the video that came out showed me that the terrorist that killed him, was in fact an Apache pilot, flying for (Wait for it) America. I am further shocked that you continue to fall for the B/S lie that we as a nation are not a bunch of hypocritical liars, which by the way, WE ARE! Free Assange, free Bradley Manning and let the truth be free. The only way we can free ourselves from the stupidity is by finding the truth, and it sure isn't going to come out of any politicians mouth.

        • 2 votes
        #1.23 - Sun Jun 24, 2012 9:47 AM EDT

        QUOTE: "WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Friday said he was ready for a life in Ecuador and said the country had been "quite supportive" of his bid for asylum"

        One has to wonder what embarrassing information could be 'leaked' by Assange concerning Ecuadorian officials if they do not cooperate with him. He seems to know a great deal about them.

        • 1 vote
        #1.24 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 5:53 AM EDT

        He made a deal with them never to post their dirty laundry. He picks and chooses his targets therefore revealing his bias.

          #1.25 - Thu Jul 5, 2012 3:19 PM EDT
          Reply

          Sure, let him go to Ecuador. Once he is settled, send in a CIA operative to kill him.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#2 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:22 AM EDT

          Just Let him stay there forever. Ecuador straddles the equator. He will be burned over there.

          • 2 votes
          #2.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:27 AM EDT
          Reply

          So Ecuador believes in protecting and supporting those charged with sexual assault? I would like to hear the official line on that.

          • 5 votes
          Reply#3 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:24 AM EDT

          MAN UP Assange, or don't you know how? You want to be found innocent of these charges? Prove it in a court...

          • 6 votes
          Reply#4 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:29 AM EDT

          Yea, right, like the sexual assault charge is real? Get a grip, Assange is dealing with the most dangerous entity in the world, the US military. I admire him, and think his work should continue. I'd love to donate, but the US has closed all portals to donating to him, and without a trial! This is the proud USA at work? He simply doesn't want governments to operate in the dark, and you know what? I don't either. As the Taliban is secretive, the US government is secretive, just like you see with the Holder contempt issue where b hussein o won't even let the congress hear what he's up to.

          • 5 votes
          Reply#5 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:37 AM EDT

          If you have been paying attention all along, you would know the only reason he is wanted for "questioning" in Sweden, is because England won't extradite him to the U.S. Why is it The U.S.'s best ally won't extradite him?

          False charges in Sweden from two women who didn't come forward till after they were "contacted" by agents working for the U.S. I don't blame the guy one bit. He reported facts to the world about The U.S. murdering innocent people, and he is the criminal?

          The U.S. expects everyone to follow their rules yet won't respond to accusations of murder from the International courts. I hope he gets a medal.

          • 3 votes
          Reply#6 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:49 AM EDT

          You would be scared too if you were in his shoes. The whole deal with extradition to Sweden on alleged suspicion of sex-assault is simply a ruse for his detention and eventual deportation to the US for prosecution over the release of the significant and damming Wikileak documents he released for the whole world to see, revealing the horrendous activities carried out "on our behalf" by our government and its lackeys around the world.

          I, for one, would rather see Assange and others like him continue their battles to release such vital documents which unveil the true and ugly face of our government and the atrocities we commit around the world disguised as "promoting democracy".

          Our country always seems to need an enemy or adversary with whom to be at odds. In the latter part of the 20th century, during the Cold War, it was Cuba, Vietnam and the "The Evil Empire" of the former Soviet Union. These days, the big concern is China, not to mention Irak, Afghanistan, North Korea and Iran. We are perpetually in conflict with one country or another, be it over ideology, politics or economics. This nation, since before its founding, has never known a generation of peace - war after war after war - all in the name of protecting "American interests" or "preserving our freedoms".

          Our so-called "leaders" tell us, time and time again, that the peoples at odds with us "hate" us because they envy our "freedoms". That is patently false and nothing short of playing to the ugliest jingoistic slogans and stereotypes. In fact, most people around the world, including many adversaries, admire our country, its liberties and advancements. All peoples yearn for freedom not despotism. What they "hate" about us is our imperialistic bullying and penchant for solving conflicts through interventions, blockades, embargoes, sanctions and wars - whether military, financial or economic.

          I have expressed my opinion based on a long lifetime of first-hand experience and careful analysis of world events. Some in this forum may strongly disagree with my statements, however, I voice them with sincerity and respect for all who may read them. Thank you for listening with an open mind.

          • 5 votes
          Reply#7 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:54 AM EDT

          Very well said Carl.

          • 1 vote
          #7.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:17 PM EDT
          Reply

          When will the US have to answer for their crimes!

          • 1 vote
          Reply#8 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:25 AM EDT

          Ha! When we become the size of Belgium...perhaps when we dont have the baddass military? Perhaps when we stop paying the majority of the UN Peacekeeping budget...perhaps when we stop donating and providing aid, billions of taxpayers money, to other countries in need.

          ALL GOVERNMENTS are corrupt...some more so than others. The US is not that bad...some issues, but I HAVE been around the world...several countries, modern and third world...be careful for what you ask for and let us do what we need for "national security." Not brainwashed...just realist. Some people need to get outside of their lil' bunker, city, state before commenting on this.

          As for as ASSange goes...goodbye. Scared...Ecuador cant protect you either. Once you have a warrant on your head (which will come next if this rendevous doesnt work out)...we will get you no matter where. Your best bet IS to be sent to the US, face a court and most likely will be acquitted...and for what you have done deserves the harshest penalty. Truth and national security have to draw a line and cannot overlap. The two cannot coexist...things are done or are needed to be done to protect our children...apparently, some idiots still cannot grasp that concept.

          Who cares what the US government does in relation to Afghan, etc. Haiti? who cares. What I care about is to stop sending these 3rd world countries billions of dollars when we should take care of our own people (not politicians) first.

          Assange had his motives...truth (perhaps)...but he was getting paid too. Look deeper and you'll find out by who....

          Peace!

          • 1 vote
          #8.1 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:51 PM EDT
          Reply

          I thought all grand jury investigations were secret? Faces the death penalty in the USA? No, they would never get that conviction and not sure what charges they could use to even try. He is not an American citizen so treason is out.

          He is a self important little twerp and it seems possibly a rapist. He got a bunch of information dumped on him and chose to put it out irregardless of who might of got or hurt or killed as a result. He is not some sort of noble voice calling out in a wilderness of evil. Switzerland will probably put him in jail, if he is convicted, a lot longer on the rape charges than the USA will on any charges we come up with.

          The whole crap about us putting him to death is a bunch of crap aimed at avoiding trail in Switzerland for rape.

          • 3 votes
          Reply#9 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:37 AM EDT

          First of all, it's Sweden, not Switzerland. Why won't England extradite him to the U.S.? Because England won't ever extradite someone if the country they are charged in has the death penalty and the charge may warrant the death penalty. Since the U.S. has already subpoenaed several people related to the case, but has been secretive about the charges, not even admitting they have charged him, you are actually witnessing real justice here.

          As far as releasing information (irregardless is not a word by the way, although it is often used as one) that may hurt people, The U.S. gov't has no problem bombing innocent civilians in the name of "freedom", but when someone calls them on it they are criminals. What happened to "of the people, by the people, for the people?" Now it's the gov't, by the gov't, for the corporations".

          How long until something like this(secret charges or no trial) happens to someone you know? If you pay attention to news outlets actually trying to report the news, you will see it's happening all over the U.S. to everyday people.

          Finally, he has not been charged with a crime in SWEDEN, he is wanted just for questioning because they know they will never get a conviction. Two women came forward only after they were approached by U.S. aligned agents. No physical evidence. No witnesses.

          Funny how easy it is to call someone a criminal when you know very little about the topic.

          • 3 votes
          #9.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:30 PM EDT

          If this guy has not committed a crime, why does he act like he has. This guy is a complete and total coward. I hope we get him here in the USA. This guy stinks like a dirty Stone Mason !

          • 3 votes
          #9.2 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:45 PM EDT

          Roger you have once again shown how ignorant you are. International law states that he does not have to answer to the U.S. You have made it clear that you don't know that. So keep running your mouth and showing what a fool you are.

          • 3 votes
          #9.3 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:20 PM EDT

          No kidding he does not have to answer the U.S. .... But he does have to answer to the country that is trying to get him. Why has this coward not done that if he has nothing to hide as he claims. Rather then face the music, he hides like a coward in an embassy. Perhaps you should go take him milk and cookies.

          • 2 votes
          #9.4 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:29 PM EDT

          It's politically motivated. Thus asylum in Ecuador. You have ignored the fact that the Swedish legal system has ye to charge him with anything. They want to question him. Once he is in Sweden, he will be extradited to the U.S. to face a kangaroo court. Read information on an English language but Swedish origin news site. It will give you a better understanding of what is really happening. But it's so much easier to judge without the facts, isn't it Roger?

          • 2 votes
          #9.5 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:12 PM EDT

          Sorry about the Sweden/Switzerland gaff. I just read the article and manged to do that.

          Still, stand by the rest.

          Despite a bunch of chest thumping and outrageous statements by some in the USA, I am not really sure what we can charge him with since he is not an American citizen and he was not the one who actually took the information in the first place. Pretty positive that we are not going to be able to come up with any charge that will lead to a death sentence.

          I do not like a lot of things about the Patriot Act and other measures getting passed. I go a long with the thought that those who give up freedom to obtain security do not deserve the former and will not obtain the latter.

          There a legitimate reasons for governments to keep secrets. And so there are legitimate reasons to prosecute people who knowing tell such secrets. Not everything is a conspiracy by some one to gain control of the world. I am not a big fan of diplomacy and face saving crap that goes on, I think a little more bluntness and truth speaking would be nice, but it is not always possible. (Ever face the question "Honey, does this dress make me look fat?") A lot of the stuff put out was that sort of thing, blunt honest opinions of diplomats for other diplomats, governments, situations, that they would never have said publicly. I do not see any real public good coming for its revelation other than entertainment, and can see were it undermines our foreign policy. Some of it was of a much more serious nature and while you can truthfully argue that that information was important to release, it conversely also points out why it was not released.

          I am not going to argue any specific piece of information that was released should of been or should not have been released. The flow was too great for that. There in lies my problem with its release. Those who released could not of vetted the information made any realistic determination of whether or not the cost of release would out weight the benefit. They could of cared less if thousands ended up dead or any other disaster occurred. They seem to me to just want to be big important people and be damn the cost. With that conclusion, my opinion, I want them to be prosecuted to the full extent possible.

          Of course my opinion of Assange is influenced by my utter contempt for the gentleman who gave him the information.

          • 2 votes
          #9.6 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:16 PM EDT

          I appreciate your response. I wish more people had contempt for all the killing being performed in the name of "freedom".

          • 2 votes
          #9.7 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:33 PM EDT

          Ed, thank you for a very well written and thought out statement. Yours makes about the most sense as anything posted so far. In my opinion, Assange is guilty of violating this country's National Security Act whether he is a citizen of this country or not. He and his cohorts, specifically one Bradley Manning knowingly released classified documents that could potentially, if not actually, put U.S. military personal and civilians as well into extreme danger. We do not know and probably will not ever know whether their actions caused the deaths of American personnel. I state here and now that I do not agree with all that the U.S. government does, but I firmly believe that we do not need to know everything. I spent 20 years in the honorable service of my country as a U.S. Navy Hospital Corpsman and I cannot abide with Manning'spotentially treasonous acts knowing he may have had something to do with deaths of my fellow brothers and sisters in arms. As somebody who has survived two wars, I can tell you that I hate seeing killing and death and never wish to see another one. I have difficulty accepting that Assange acted out of altruism or the need to expose truth for truths sake. I firmly believe Assange to be a narcissistic megalomaniac. Those of you posting here who wish to damn me for my views, you are most welcome to do so as this is a forum for exchange of views and opinions that all are entitled to. Just bear in mind that all people's views and opinions are shaped by their past experiences in life. I do not know your experiences and you do not know mine. To all, a good day.

          • 2 votes
          #9.8 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:13 PM EDT
          Reply

          This narcisstic .exhibitionist spoiled brat and thief ( yes opening up peoples maill is theft !) must first face serious sexual charges in Sweden This country is no great friend of the U.S and has an independent judiciary .It is a very serious country regarding sexual offenses.Solange will have is day in court and will then be either convicted or exonerated.The decision will be made by a Swedish jury or judge All his defender are spouting of ridiculous nonsenseHe must face the music!.Ed you are right!. Sweden is the country not Switzerland..But asdie from that you are right on!!

          • 2 votes
          Reply#10 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:43 AM EDT

          Mr. Correa is an intelligent person. Let's hope Mr. Correa will not fall into this cheap trap... South America (as the whole world!) have enough sex transgresor. Any person accused of sexual assaults must stand before justice and clean himself (if he really deserve that).

          Sweden is not a country that will misjudge and mistrial anyone. And certainly, the allegations that he will be transfered to US are too cheap to believe in them.

          Keep south america away from those kind of sexual accused crminals. Tomorrow anyone with women or child abuse will use the same excuses...

          • 1 vote
          Reply#11 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:48 AM EDT

          Irony is a harsh mistress... I sincerely hope Mr. Assange enjoys living in a repressive culture...

            Reply#12 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:14 PM EDT

            Assange is holed up in Ecuador's embassy in London, England

            Excellent choice. He should remain unmolested in that embassy unless he ever tries to leave. Ecuador should also understand they will be billed for collecting his rotting carcass 40 years or so from now.

              Reply#13 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:50 PM EDT

              He should go to Pakistan or Irac. They'll protect him. They hate the United States.

                Reply#14 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:51 PM EDT

                He should be bring to Sweden to confront the sexual accusations. Then, if he's proved innocent, he can go to Ecuador or wharever he wants. If not...

                I do believe in the Swedish courts. Particularly when the whole world will be looking at such a trial.

                • 1 vote
                #14.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:41 PM EDT

                Assange is a whistle blower, not a thief. he was given the information, he didn't steal it. The New Your Times published it, why are they not on trial??. It was all the filthy truth of your ugly, filthy government. You Americans just hide behind your 'God bothering' ways and think that God will save the day.The rape accusations filed in Sweden are politically motivated, if you understand what that means!!.

                If you have ever seen the first file that Assange was given, you will see the blatant murder of innocent Iraqi's, in the illegal invasion of Iraq.

                You are a power, but not for much longer, if you ever manage to get yourselves out of your war debts, I hope you have some change to help the one in six Americans living in dire poverty without medical insurance

                , you are a sick pack of losers and can't accept the truth. Sweden has a right wing Government, a puppet of the US of A, your government is scared of the fitly, murderous truth becoming knowledge of it's past, present and future atrocities, it doesn't know when to stop, it is a diseased state.

                IN GOD YOU TRUST, you have no one else to.

                • 2 votes
                #14.2 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:10 PM EDT
                Reply

                I like the idea of if he has done nothing wrong then he should go back to Sweden and face the music aspect. Reminds of the if you aren't a witch then the flames won't hurt you or the rocks won't sink you way of doing thing from years gone by.

                Not saying he is guilty or innocent, just getting a kick out of some of these posts.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#15 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:50 PM EDT

                Sweden justice has no sign (or whatsoever) of the Catholic inquisitors.

                • 1 vote
                #15.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:34 PM EDT

                But can you say the same for the U. S. after Sweden ships him out?

                  #15.2 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:29 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  ECUADOR SUPPORTS ME EVERY YEAR ! ! !

                  I love Ecuador, and go there every August 11-17. Those are coincidentally the same dates my 387 lb Obese wife Mildred travell Wisconsin,to the annual Sheboygan Troth Eating Festival. While in Quito Ecuador, I am supported by a cornucopia of adolescent girls during the day, and Lap Dancing Moms at night. Ecuador also supports my Cocaine habit, at reasonable prices.

                  "Isnt it nice to know the "natives to the south" can "serve" a meaningful purpose for Sex craved Coke addicts like me"

                  VIVA ECUADORRRRRR"

                    Reply#16 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:17 PM EDT

                    If you support this Clown, just "aks" yourself:

                    "WOULD I ALLOW THIS GUY TO DATE MY DAUGHTER?"

                    Now that those formally supporting this "Pillar of Humanity" have found reality, my words served a purpose

                      Reply#17 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:22 PM EDT

                      Do you haters of America live here?? If so,why not go somewhere else to spew your hate??Why live in this country if it is sooooo awful?? This guy is a piece of crap!!

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#18 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:24 PM EDT

                      I live in the USA and I am not American, I would NEVER become an American, I come here for 6 months per year to make money and then go back to my wonderful country. I do charity work for the indigenous Americans who have been treated so badly, also the black Americans.

                      read your history books patriotic Girl.

                      • 2 votes
                      #18.1 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:29 AM EDT

                      OH, so you earn your money in the US but hate us and for which we stand? How about...can you say, hipocrite? Please? Cmon? Cross the border? French Canadian? lmao.

                      • 1 vote
                      #18.2 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:58 PM EDT

                      Stephen, this is one Native American who will gladly tell you please go back to your "wonderful country" and stay there. We don't need your help and we certainly do not need condescending attitudes like yours! Oh, and please do not let the turnstyle at the airport hit you in the rear end on the way out!

                      • 1 vote
                      #18.3 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:20 PM EDT

                      Patriotic chick, why do you hate America?

                        #18.4 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:43 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        ECUADOR SUPPORTS ME EVERY YEAR ! ! !

                        I love Ecuador, and go there every August 11-17. Those are coincidentally the same dates my 387 lb Obese wife Mildred travell Wisconsin,to the annual Sheboygan Troth Eating Festival. While in Quito Ecuador, I am supported by a cornucopia of adolescent girls during the day, and Lap Dancing Moms at night. Ecuador also supports my Cocaine habit, at reasonable prices.

                        "Isnt it nice to know the "natives to the south" can "serve" a meaningful purpose for Sex craved Coke addicts like me"

                        VIVA ECUADORRRRRR"

                          Reply#19 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:37 PM EDT

                          Stone Mason? Just plain stoned is more like it. If you really think America is really that F--ked then what hell are you doing living here? If you don't like it here - then go find some 3rd world Sh--hole and go plant your flag there. Try Iran on for size - I'm sure they'd LOVE YOU.

                          Ecuador? Move there ya crackhead! Why the hell do you come back if it's so great there? Both of you bottom feeders are drunk on your own pissant drivel.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#20 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:55 PM EDT

                          Why do you hate America, socomofo?

                            #20.1 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:44 PM EDT
                            Reply

                            How about some of us just say...I love the USA. Pleadge allegiance. Support our government even if I dont care for the President. The hippie Assange deserves what is coming.

                              Reply#21 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:00 PM EDT

                              Thanks all you patriotic people that have commented on here!!! Are there problems here??? Yes,but where is there any perfect place??? What does this man work at that he is only here for 6 months?? I am part American Indian and I am torn between what happened in the past and the future for them,but I am very proud of them..

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#22 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:30 PM EDT

                              Oh, by the way,I am a history buff and don't be obnoxious by assuming you know me..

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#23 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:34 PM EDT

                              What, watching tinfoil hat shows on the History Channel?

                                #23.1 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:44 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                I love Ecuador, and go there every August 11-17. Those are coincidentally the same dates my 387 lb Obese wife Mildred travell Wisconsin,to the annual Sheboygan Troth Eating Festival. While in Quito Ecuador, I am supported by a cornucopia of adolescent girls during the day, and Lap Dancing Moms at night. Ecuador also supports my Cocaine habit, at reasonable prices.

                                "Isnt it nice to know the "natives to the south" can "serve" a meaningful purpose for Sex craved Coke addicts like me"

                                VIVA ECUADORRRRRR"

                                  Reply#24 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:40 PM EDT

                                  He is a coward. He wont stand up like a man. To hide in another countries consulate just to avoid accusations of wrong doing prooves he is guilty of it. He has no credability, no honor, just another low life predator, who destroys what he can out of hate. I wouldn't doubt it if he has scammed older people out of their retirement in the past. He has the attitude for it. Any person who will not stand up to defend their honor isnt worth a hill of beans

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#25 - Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:28 AM EDT
                                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.