Travelers run for cover as cops kill cops at Mexico City airport

Travelers run for cover as federal officers are killed by cops suspected of drug trafficking. Msnbc.com's Dara Brown reports.

MEXICO CITY -- Three policemen died in a shootout with two other officers suspected of drug trafficking at Mexico City's airport on Monday, as panicked travelers scrambled for cover in the busy facility.

The shootout occurred when three federal officers approached the two suspects in the airport's Terminal 2, which handles international and domestic flights. Two agents were killed at the terminal and another later died of his injuries in hospital.


More than a dozen shots were heard, Milenio Television reported. Television footage showed a body lying on the floor of the terminal in what appeared to be a publicly accessible area of the airport.

Three shots rang out at first, witness Israel Lopez, a 23-year-old Mexico City student who had gone to the airport to see off a friend, told The Associated Press. Lopez didn't see who those shots were directed at, but then the gunfire came closer.

Alfredo Estrella / AFP - Getty Images

Federal Police officers stand guard at an entrance near the fast-food area of Benito Juarez international airport Terminal 2, in Mexico City, where two police officers were shot dead and a third was wounded on Monday. Airport spokesman Jorge Andres Gomez said authorities are going through the security cameras to know the exact events of the shooting.

"We were in the food court, and some policemen came in and started shooting at another policeman who was on the floor," Lopez told the AP. "We dove to the floor and covered ourselves with chairs."

Lopez said the shooters wore blue uniforms like those of federal police who provide security at the airport. He said the shooters then ran to the parking area "as if they were pursuing somebody," and he lost sight of them.

'One of the safest places'
Robert Gray, an evangelical missionary from Hart, Michigan, but who has lived with his family in the city of Puebla for the past four years, arrived at the airport after the shooting with his wife, two daughters and son to catch a flight back to the U.S. to visit family.

"It's surprising to see it happening at the airport. It's one of the safest places in the city," Gray told the AP.

The suspects, who remain at large, are believed to be part of a larger group of officials involved in a cocaine ring, Mexico's security ministry said in a statement.

"The Federal Police has identified the two officers who opened fire and several investigative units are now focused on capturing them," the federal Public Safety Department said in a statement.

14 mutilated corpses, threat message to drug cartel found in Mexican city

Airport spokesman Jorge Gomez told Milenio that aircraft departures and arrivals continued normally after the incident.

The airport said in a press statement that the terminal and flights were operating normally following what it described as "a dispute in an open-access area." But the food court remained blocked to public access for hours after the shooting.

Mexico's drug war is also part of a drug culture with roots in music, movies and even religion

Mexico City has seen relatively low murder rates compared to the rest of the country, where drug violence has killed around 55,000 people in the past five-and-a-half years.

Severed heads
But attacks have been creeping up in the capital and its surrounding neighborhoods, with more than 300 gangland killings recorded last year.

Mexico's airports and ports are busy areas for drug smugglers. So far this year federal police have seized more than 440 pounds of cocaine at the capital's airport, double the amount taken there last year.

Alfredo Estrella / AFP - Getty Images

A passenger speaks on her cellphone at Benito Juarez international airport Terminal 2, in Mexico City, where two police officers were shot dead and a third was wounded on Monday.

In 2007, the severed heads of three employees of a customs brokerage firm were found near the airport and in the nearby state of Mexico.

The decapitations were apparently retaliation for the seizure of a half-ton of Colombian cocaine at the airport, officials said at the time.

Mexico got wrong man in high-profile drug arrest 

In 2008, federal police chief Edgar Millan was gunned down inside his Mexico City home, and one of the suspects in that killing had worked as an anti-drug officer at the Mexico City airport.

The suspect had a notebook with detailed information on drug trafficking at the airport, and officials said federal investigations into those operations may have been a key motive for Millan's killing.

Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 12

And the airport stayed open. If this happened in America, they would have shut down the airport and cancelled all the flights and strip searched everyone inside the airport!

  • 69 votes
#1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:18 AM EDT

And if they didn't shut down the airport and the perps got away you would have bitched about that as well.

  • 48 votes
#1.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:54 AM EDT
Comment author avatarmowdy5gsExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Mexico is virtually UN regulated. You know, like tea bagging republican extremist want us to be. ;] On so many threads in particular you hear whining that " Mexico does it", Or those Mexicans get away with it".. So in fact the feeble brain projects there wish. The wish to be Mexico. Government is bought and paid for [citizens united] Those at the top are the only folks to actually PROSPER.. [corrupt officials and cartels record profits for corporations and the loss of wages for those still at the bottom of the corporations.], endless death without medical care [de regulation and killing health care mandates] etc on and on.. ; ]

It is Mexico that the goper's wish to immolate to a T. [ ]t].. Regression is sad and childlike. Grow up my friends. The direction is forward and God made time move that direction for a reason. A society of millions upon millions as we have here simplistic notions do not compute add up nor do they equate. You will not have cars, hospitals air condition fans guns easy food to get you FAT or any of that without society it is to large to do so. Hence our government for the people by the people. ; ]

Do you think those rich record profit making hot shot will take you in or with them? They see you as dirt beneath there nails to file down and subjugate.

Cheers

  • 24 votes
#1.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:23 AM EDT

Mowdy, WTF are you ramblin about? Put the crack pipe down and grow a brain.

  • 109 votes
#1.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:35 AM EDT

It is Mexico that the goper's wish to immolate to a T.

I hope you mean "emulate."

  • 30 votes
#1.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:37 AM EDT

Unbelievable! I've been to Mexico twice in the last 5 years, I'm done! Such a damn shame, everyone down there is so nice, but the crime and violence is off the charts! It starts as soon as you land, you try walking through the damn airport to your ride waiting for you, and all the guys working there with their stupid badges start swarming around you like flies on pooh. They'll straight up tell you your ride left (they are lying through their teeth), and intimidate the hell outta you until you step aside and listen to all the crap they want to sell you. Then you tell the resort how crazy the airport is and what they do to you and their eyes pop out of their heads in disbelief. They have NO idea what goes on at their own airports. They don't ever fly anywhere. When will this stupid drug violence end, the 12th of never?!

  • 36 votes
#1.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:48 AM EDT
Comment author avatardavefromdanapointcaExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

BTW, it is the democrat party that wants the USA to be UN (Useless Nations) regulated. I have never heard a democrat advocate the USA pulling out of the U.N. but almost all my republican friends do advocate telling the UN to leave and go build their office in sweden or some other liberal $hithole country. So take your own advice and growup yourself. Grow up, get an education (you obviously need one), a job, a life, and move out of your moms basement.

On the other whacky subject you

  • 50 votes
#1.7 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:53 AM EDT

Since when did any laws get enacted by the corporations?

  • 8 votes
#1.8 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:57 AM EDT
JaneEcoDeleted

This is why they can never get a handle on the drug trafficking problem in Mexico, the cops that are supposed to stopping it are either running the operations themselves or are being paid to provide security for them by the cartels. The police ho do try and put a stop to the cartels find themselves out gunned and sold out by their fellow officers. It is hard to make a drug bust when our fellow officers are on the take and tipping off the cartels about when and where you are coming after them. Of course this is not just limited to Mexico, it happens here in the US as well, just not quite so frequently. When I was living in New Orleans years ago they broke up the largest drug ring in the city which it turned out was being run by five New Orleans police officers.

  • 74 votes
#1.10 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:05 AM EDT

Mexico City has seen relatively low murder rates compared to the rest of the country, where drug violence has killed around 55,000

Where is the rage of Congress and the politicians about this? Where are with our "human rights" rhetoric that we preach in China?

This proves that politicians are just looking for "human rights" where there is oil, or a profit, or something be made for political advancement.

  • 40 votes
#1.12 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:28 AM EDT

JaneEco

And the common many, many Mexicans who gladly take a dollar to behead, rape, mutilate their fellow Mexicans and sell drugs to Americans, innocent children in American have their lives ruined by the drugs the Mexicans sell while killing their own children to make the dollar.

  • 18 votes
#1.13 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:37 AM EDT

Does anyone really believe this behavior would stop with legalization and taxing. Not hardly. The black market system is already in place. The damage drugs do to a society is but one issue. These incidents are reminiscent of the gang wars of the 20's and 30's in Chicago. Legalization would merely rationalize government corruption in the involvement.

  • 13 votes
#1.14 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:59 AM EDT

Well Ken I certainly believe legalization would fix it because that is what is working elsewhere. I tend to believe what I see and what works not what someone else tells me to believe. Sorry but yeah it will work.

  • 55 votes
#1.15 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:12 AM EDT

If for any reason you don't think legalizing and regulating drugs would fix the illegal drug market problem then read about the alcohol prohibition of the 20's. Pretty much when they decided to make alcohol illegal it was the most violent decade or so in the 20th century. Then when the government realized after many years of violence that it was a dumb decision they reversed it. So, we now have the current laws in place regulating alcohol. How many murders, shootings, and deaths do we have from the illegal alcohol market now? Point made.

  • 45 votes
#1.16 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:31 AM EDT

Ken-848629

These incidents are reminiscent of the gang wars of the 20's and 30's in Chicago. Legalization would merely rationalize government corruption in the involvement.

You provided the rational and proof to your own question.

Not all of us want ALL drugs legalized. However making certain drugs, specifically MJ, a controlled substance, along the lines of alcohol and tobacco, would free up resources to address the larger issues.

Government is more likely to be corrupted by keeping all drugs illegal.

Granted legalization won't solve things overnight but it would work in short order. Illicit drugs are a multi BILLION dollar industry annually. Legalization would have a multiplier effect as it would reduce our costs on the penal side of things as well as bring the underground economy above board. At one time MJ was estimated to be the number one crop at more than wheat and corn combined.

  • 27 votes
#1.17 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:39 AM EDT

This is a SHOCK! I wasn't aware there were any people left in Mexico......

  • 44 votes
#1.18 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:25 AM EDT

This has gotta be bad for tourism in Mexico... don't think I'll be booking a trip anytime soon although there are many places I would otherwise like to see in Mexico. I hope the government (Mexican, not ours) will realize that they need to step up to the plate a bit more to eradicate the gangs. Otherwise, Mexico is going to completely go down the crapper into economic oblivion really soon.

  • 5 votes
#1.19 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:29 AM EDT

In the words of Carlos Mencia, what a bunch of "Dee Dee Dee's"

  • 4 votes
#1.20 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:32 AM EDT

I am all for legalization of certain drugs, not all. Sweet Mother of Jesus, we would have cities of zombies eating peoples faces off.

  • 14 votes
#1.21 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:34 AM EDT

Wonder where old Taco Bender Mitt stands on this !!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 6 votes
#1.22 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:36 AM EDT

Legalizing pot isn't going to do jack sh!t. You don't need to go to Meh-kee-ko to buy it. People would still break the law and bootleg it just so they wouldn't have to pay the taxes on it.

Besides, the real money is in cocaine, heroin and meth and I don't see anybody ready to legalize that sh!t anytime soon.

  • 9 votes
#1.23 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:48 AM EDT
Comment author avatarJohn-2442193Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I love the age old stupid argument of legalize drugs to reduce crime and generate revenue. Here's a thought, if drugs are legalized and TAXED, then people will still buy illegal drugs because they will cost less as they will not have to pay TAXES! Then how do you seperate the legal drugs from the black market drugs? Tax stamps? People will just stuff their illegal drugs in the stamped containers solving NOTHING. Take alook at how much intrastate cigarette smuggling takes place between states that have little or no taxes on cigarettes to avoid taxes and therefore pay less per carton. Open your yes and get a clue drugged out hippie losers. Yeah man legalize it man... Idiots.

  • 9 votes
#1.24 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:49 AM EDT

Right on JaneEco. All you folks out there smoking or snorting mexican dope have blood on your hands. Enjoy your highs while you are subsidising this heinous business.

Agreed John 2442193 but some of it would get taxed. Taxes collected that our elected officials could waste on some other pet project or failed federal program.

  • 9 votes
#1.25 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:01 AM EDT

The argument for legalizing drugs is a valid one, and the excuses people make up for denying that are interesting at the least, but never factual. If the price of the drug of your choice (Cigs, booze, pot, etc.) is not being pressured by law enforcement activities, then the product becomes like any other commodity, and the free market will determine the pricing and availablity. Most likely, any bootlegging will be similar to cigarettes, with sales at below market rates to cheat the government out of their taxes. For the average citizen, this would be more than they want to deal with, and they'll just buy it legally.

For whatever reason, people want to get messed up occasionally, and it happens all over the world. You can't legislate something so widespread, and to be honest, I have no idea why we try so hard. In states where Medical MJ is legal, the prices for product have dropped significantly, as the quality has improved, and life has gotten easier for those who want to get high without the MAN messing with them. The Mexican drug cartels would have little to no avenue to support their business, and they would turn to something else, like kidnapping and extortion, but at least it would be in Mexico.

  • 16 votes
#1.26 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:06 AM EDT

the taxes on legalized pot wouldn't amount to much....does anyone think that legal MJ would sell for $400 an ounce? the price drop alone would kill illegal trade.

  • 9 votes
#1.27 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:17 AM EDT

To Jon and John,

You guys are crazy, lol. Come on man. Seriously? How many people are smuggling alcohol and cigarettes? Maybe Joey and Suzy who bought a pack of smokes and a six pack because it was cheaper in the next border state. They heavily promote that here in NH. "Come to tax free NH and buy your crap". Are there beheadings and shoot outs? When someone is being loud and beligerent at a ball game or down the street is it the potheads? What problem has a pothead caused in your neck of the woods? You guys have no clue man. It sucks that people like you and that think like you have any influence on our society. We will never evolve and move forward.

  • 25 votes
#1.28 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:18 AM EDT
Comment author avatarEbeneser HowardExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

MOWDY- "Mexico is virtually UN regulated. You know, like tea bagging republican extremist want us to be." Get your facts straight before you make stupid *ss comments like this! You Couldn't be further from the truth. Its your f*ggot *ss Pres. Obama who wants to the UN to regulate the world, not Tea Party Republicans. If Republicans had it our their way the UN would have nothing to do with America, the Fed would be disbanned, and power would be left to the states. You sir, are an idiot! I sure hope you're not voting this November; It's because of people like you that people like Obama get elected to the most powerful office in the world and then use it to murder democracy and force socialism on us.

  • 12 votes
#1.29 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:20 AM EDT

they can't legalize these drugs cause then would not be able to fund their own private wars

  • 8 votes
#1.30 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:22 AM EDT

How long do you think it will take for people to listen to what they are told they can't ingest? The demand will never go away. People have been told for over 50 yrs that "hey, if you keep smoking cigarettes then you will certainly die from it". Guess what? People are still smoking. So let me know when you think you can control what people ingest. It is and always will be forever impossible! Dream on my ignorant caveman friends.

  • 11 votes
#1.31 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:24 AM EDT

And this is probably some gun shop owner in Texas or Arizona's fault.

  • 4 votes
#1.32 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:26 AM EDT

We have a failed state next door but we keep spending billions of dollars a month chasing bearded Muslims in faraway places... unbelievable stupidity...

  • 25 votes
#1.33 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:34 AM EDT

An interesting concept I read in a sci-fi book once- legalize all drugs, but include a paralytic in the formula. That way, people can mess themselves up, but can't affect anyone else while under the influence. Could be something to look into for the harder kinds.

  • 2 votes
#1.34 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:37 AM EDT

Why is it that the bad guys in Mexico are almost always more competent than the good guys in Mexico?

  • 14 votes
#1.35 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:40 AM EDT

does holder get more money every time one of his guns gets used?

  • 16 votes
#1.36 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:44 AM EDT

Travelers run for cover as cops kill cops at Mexico City airport

I read stories like these and then think back to the Supreme Court's decision on the Arizona immigration law and the administrations reaction to it and I'm starting to think that Obama is either on the payroll of the Mexican drug cartels or he truly wants to turn the US into its neighbor to the South. I can think of no other explanations.

  • 22 votes
#1.37 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:47 AM EDT

the taxes on legalized pot wouldn't amount to much....does anyone think that legal MJ would sell for $400 an ounce? the price drop alone would kill illegal trade.

This is probably true, however, cutting the cost of incarcerating a million people and of the cat and mouse game over pot would put a nice dent in the spending.

So you might not get a winfall from the taxes but you would in budget cuts. And, it would likely create a few entrepreneurs and "job creators" in the process.

The fallacy here is that the current system is preventing anyone that wants to get from doing it. There is more weed and coke out there than there was before Nixon started this idiotic war on drugs.

  • 13 votes
#1.38 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:53 AM EDT

God help us all...I can't believe how many of you believe the UN is the root of all evil (it's been unable to pass or enforce much of anything against the big oil that's killing us all) and that legalization won't work (when the violence level in countries where most drugs ARE legal is close to nil).

What's worse, not one mention of the WTO- which is really the only "liberal" group you should be worried about- because, just like Republicans, they claim as their mandate the liberalization of trade.

Let me translate that for you: you will have exactly what the average person on this planet has in twenty years if they get their way.

That average will also be lower than it is right now, because the folks at the top of the economic food chain plan to remove and concentrate most wealth for their own benefit while starving the rest of us down to a "sustainable populace".

Your lack of vigilance has put you firmly under the thumb of a multinational corporatocracy which knows no borders, accepts no regulation, and owns your government courtesy of the Citizens United ruling by a SCOTUS which was packed (by the good ol' Bush boys) chock full of sock puppets no less corrupt than Mexican drug lords.

We're already enjoying the bitter fruit of your idiocy- American prosperity is never returning because the folks you think you elected don't want your economy to recover- they're doing great, you're paying for it, and that's the way they like it..

We're past the tipping point, and it's likely to stay this way until enough fools starve to allow the rest to restore sanity.

Fools won't survive without the edifice of civilization they just destroyed- and I pity them- but they've created circumstances which will wipe them out while their smarter peers endure.

  • 5 votes
#1.39 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:56 AM EDT

DRUGS NEVER HURT NOBODY BUT THOSE WHO TOOKEM!

It is the fault of the United States for everything!

Did I get it?

You know what, there's a demand. And until the demand stops, like JaneEco basically states, you can expect a lot more blood.

Its kind of how everybody here likes to buy gas cheap, as long as they don't have to see the actual people getting killed over it.

"That'll be one joint, a bag of heroine, 8 gallons of gas paid with cash. Take the rest of your payment in pints of blood from someone else, please."

  • 3 votes
#1.40 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:10 AM EDT

I'll say one thing. Everyone has an opinion. Some sensible, some weird, a few agreeable with others but everyone has an opinion. Gotta love it.

Now if we could just keep politics out of every conversation that doesn't warrant it.

  • 9 votes
#1.41 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:13 AM EDT

I agree 'davefrom'. The hell with the UN(less). Kick them out of US. Just another BS entity to make us a one world gov't like obummer and hit puppeteer soros want.

  • 10 votes
#1.42 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:36 AM EDT

Well, let's let them ALL into our country, that'll solve the problem.

  • 6 votes
#1.43 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:40 AM EDT

Cops killing cops in a Mexico City's crowded airport (a place claimed to be one of the safest places), mutilated corpses found, severed heads, etc. Just another routine day in Mexico.

  • 13 votes
#1.44 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:42 AM EDT

Mexico needs to put back the death penalty, martial law enforced by the army, and summary trials and executions against drug dealers and corrupt officials working with the drug lords. After a couple of thousands shot dead by firing squad their drug problem will drop to a low level.

  • 5 votes
#1.45 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:44 AM EDT

@Ken-848629

Drugs aren't legal in Mexico either, doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize if you create a new source the old source dries up or goes somewhere else. If there's no money in trafficking drugs across the border, it would stop. Basic Business 101.

  • 8 votes
#1.46 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:47 AM EDT

Yeah, kick out the UN and lose our largest source of intelligence gathering.

  • 2 votes
#1.47 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:59 AM EDT

mother's and dave, did you miss the part where the cops were shooting at EACH OTHER, because it was THE POLICE OFFICERS who were suspected of trafficing? It was the police themselves who were the suspects...

This would be the same Mexico, where the officials there are trying to convince us all that the US is just being over-cautious in giving people advisories against travel to, and would like us all to go vacation down there on account that the tourist spots are safe. I didn't know that the air port constituted a non-tourist area. And given it's the law enforcement, and not gangs or trafficers (unless the police are the trafficers) who were shooting people up :o Actually, this incident sort of proves what some of the locals from Mexico have said before, wrt the Mexican police.

If this happened in the US, the officers involved would be be brought up on charges by internal affairs, and no doubt get suspended from the force while the investigation is on going... We wouldn't just dismiss a case of cops killing each other, while putting the public safety in jeapordy... Also, don't some units (I'm rather certain the FBI does) issue psych evaluations, to try to weed out some of the potentially unstable, before putting a badge and gun in their hands? Course the FBI has a lot more stringent standards then a lot of local dept's do, but I think state police also have more stringent testing also....

  • 2 votes
#1.48 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:06 AM EDT

fbikerchick

What was that kid language where we said everything backwards so our parents didn't know what we were really saying? Don't remember but it seems the Obama supporters have adopted it as thier secret code.

"The gopers want to immulate Mexico"? That is the code for Obama loves Mexico, won't let us send any illegal entries back but gives them work visa to take the few jobs left away from Citizens and feels safe enough with that particular group that he lets his daughter go there on vacation without the parents. Oh, I see. I don't remember what we called that code but I can still decipher it.

We independent real Americans just want to put a wall up high enough and deep enough to control our own border and maybe send them Obama for a King next year.

  • 8 votes
#1.49 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:07 AM EDT

Nice red Herring disappointed and ashamed. Don't let the facts hit you in the face.

Mexican Pot and cocaine are currently illegal to consume in the US so any consumption of these products subsidises the actions of the cartels that produce them. People who buy and consume these products might as well be cutting the heads off themselves.

Last time i checked bags of severed heads aren't showing up in NH because of your current tax policy on cigs and booze, both legal products by the way. Perhaps drug use has negatively affected the regions of your brain where logic is developed.

If and when these drugs become legal you might have a point but until then the only point you have is likely on your head. Whoop .... there it is!

    #1.50 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:12 AM EDT

    These guys obviously do no know about "Code Blue", never snitch on your fellow officer......

    • 1 vote
    #1.51 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:29 AM EDT

    Some one please tell me again...why are drugs illegal? Why do we let governments tell us what we are allowed to put in our own bodies? It should be soley our CHOICE and no one else's. If we do not have sovereignty over our own bodies, and what we do with them, then we are really just slaves.

    • 5 votes
    #1.52 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:39 AM EDT

    So the Reich-wing CONservative Tea-Tagger Repugnicrats want the U.S.A. to remove itself from the United Nations. Ok, fine, the U.S.A. doesn't need to be a member of the U.N. -- but then when the U.S.A. NEEDS the U.N., the U.S.A. will be all by its lonesome and will have to fight all its wars all by itself.

    How soon the Reich-wingers forget Korea, Vietnam, Iraq/Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan......... Yes, Virginia, those were/are ALL United Nations wars.

      #1.53 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:20 PM EDT

      I don't see a problem here.

        #1.54 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:22 PM EDT

        Caligula-1763025

        Some one please tell me again...why are drugs illegal?

        Because drugs actually ruin lives and wreck families. But I suppose you think that being so "high" that your head feels like it's full of helium is just fine and dandy -- while you "just happen" to be driving a 6+ plus TON vehicle down the road.

        You want to use drugs? Go ahead, just make damn sure you do it where NOBODY ELSE will be killed just because YOU wanted to get "high".

        • 2 votes
        #1.55 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:26 PM EDT

        Danny-2923627

        These guys obviously do no know about "Code Blue", never snitch on your fellow officer......

        You, Danny boy, are part of the problem. You think that it's ok for a cop to be a criminal -- and a criminal to be a cop. Hey, Danny boy, are YOU a cop on the take?

        • 3 votes
        #1.56 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:28 PM EDT

        Airport spokesman Jorge Gomez told Milenio that aircraft departures and arrivals continued normally after the incident.

        Some luggage may have been lost in the incident, but first class passengers were still able to have free drinks. At least they weren't stuck on the tarmac for 12 hours.

        • 3 votes
        #1.57 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:32 PM EDT

        Shaking my head-2479300;

        Hey, how about this code phrase, used by ALL career politicians no matter whether they are Reich-wing Tea-Tagger Repugnicrats or Limp-wrist Toe-Tugger Demoflops:

        "I do not recall".

        And the many cousins of that phrase, including "I have no recollection of that ever happening".

        Yeah, even your Reich-wing Tea-Tagger Repugnicrat heroes use that -- and they use it a lot. It means "I actually do know, but I'm going to pretend that I don't know, so that I can continue to benefit from it and get away with doing something that may not be strictly illegal, but definitely is not ethical or moral".

        I remember how the Teflon President -- Ronald Reagan, co-star of "Bedtime for Bonzo" -- used the phrase almost every week during the last two years of his reign.........

          #1.58 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:37 PM EDT

          The hypocrisy of those who want to legalize drugs is how quickly they accuse those who don't agree with them of being a drug addict. While alcoholism and addiction to prescription drugs is growing in the US at just as an alarming rate as illegal drug use. What plays in Mexico doesn't necessarily stay in Mexico, and that Mexico has been a failed state all through the twentieth century is a matter of public record. Maybe SCOTUS should just open the southern border AND legalize drugs and we can all fail together.

          • 1 vote
          #1.59 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:37 PM EDT

          All the more reason to secure our border NOW! ironic isn't it? Our President declares amnesty for millions of ILLEGALS. His administration is responsible for arming druglords now he is claiming executive privalege. His 13 year old daughter and 12 of her closest friends along with 25 SS bodygards spent spring break in Mexico on the tax payer's dime. The hits just keep on coming! It's good to be king!

          And right after the SCOTUS takes a big chunk out of the Arizona bill (voted on and passed by the LEGAL US CITIZENS of Arizona) designed to protect the LEGAL US CITIZENS of Arizona from such atricities as these! What part of ILLEGAL alien is so hard to understand!

          • 6 votes
          #1.60 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:49 PM EDT

          Here is one of the models for legalizing drugs

          In southern California a gram of heroin costs between 40-80 dollars. If a pharmaceutical company were to make the same amount for sale it would cost that company about .35cents to produce. It could then be sold with a new clean syringe for $5.00. The profit is then broken up amongst the pharmaceutical company(say $1.40..+.35c). The place selling it($1.50+.25cents for the syringe), which could use the medical marijuana model for selling or a methadone maintenance model. .50cents goes to a fund for rehab, and the last $1.00 for taxes.

          For those saying that the black market would contiune to sell it. There would be some small amounts of reselling, but why would the bulk of people buy something on the blackmarket that is so cheap they could easly get the $5dollars themself?

          • 5 votes
          #1.61 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:49 PM EDT

          What a POS country...when will the idiotic populous start to do something anout it? Probably not for a long time since the money still flows from the illegals here back to there..number 1 source of income for a country...pathetic...Mexico is the drunk brother in law to the USA

          • 3 votes
          #1.62 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:05 PM EDT

          Jon, you are a dumb azz. You are ignorant. I'm sorry to say it but it's true. I smoke pot. I purchase it all from local growers. I work full time, getting married this fall, I own a house, I own 2 vehicles, I pay taxes, and I donate to local charities. I am a proactive, intelligent, productive member of society.

          So, what's the problem? Is it because it's illegal? So is speeding except, I smoke pot in the privacy of my own home and I'm not risking the lives of others. I'm sick of people like you that feel they have the right to tell me what I can ingest. Over the counter drugs are the scary ones. Have you read some of the side effects of some of these prescription drugs? It's like reading the list of symptoms from dangerous diseases. I have been around it all my life. I grew up around pot smokers. Most of my friends are too. Some of the best trust worthy people you would ever know.

          • 8 votes
          #1.63 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:42 PM EDT

          Jon-998022

          People who buy and consume these products might as well be cutting the heads off themselves.

          People, like yourself, who support the continuation of a spectacularly failed and costly drug war are the ones with blood on their hands. It is because of the drug laws and prohibition we have all of the violence and blood shed and deaths associated with ILLEGAL drug trafficking. You suppose that if there was no demand, there wouldn't be a drug problem. Logically that is true. BUT, in the real world, drug use and demand will NEVER GO AWAY!!! Try facing reality and use your brain to come up with a solution that makes sense. Unless you are just insane and want to keep repeating the same failed actions with the same failed results (sound familiar?). Drug prohibition, like alcohol prohibition, has promoted organized crime and funneled billions to the drug cartels making them so powerful it is probably going to take an all out war to take them down to pre-drug war levels or eradicate them all together. It's the laws that do more damage than any drug use would cause.

          Perhaps drug use has negatively affected the regions of your brain where logic is developed.

          If and when these drugs become legal you might have a point but until then the only point you have is likely on your head. Whoop .... there it is!

          I see in your response to the other poster you used condescension as a talking point. In your response to me try not to take that route otherwise I will just ignore you.

          • 5 votes
          #1.64 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:43 PM EDT

          Agnon Mema:

          Because drugs actually ruin lives and wreck families.

          And the Drug War and Drug Prohibition doesn't?

          I think it all comes down to a choice of what kind of world do we want to live in:

          1. A world with drug use and problems with addiction and a Drug War.

          -OR-

          2. A world with drug use and problems with addiction.

          I know which one I would chose: a world without a war in it.

          • 8 votes
          #1.65 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:50 PM EDT

          all I will say about Mexico's police is if your a good cop you work in a world of crap and hell..good luck amigos ...

          • 3 votes
          #1.66 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:54 PM EDT

          OneDirtyRat,

          Thanks for sticking up for me like a big bro, lol. Great comment too!!

          • 2 votes
          #1.67 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:55 PM EDT

          OneMore:

          Maybe SCOTUS should just open the southern border AND legalize drugs and we can all fail together.

          How would legalizing drugs equate failure? Other countries have taken this approach and none of the nightmare scenarios that many anti-legalizers predicted never became reality. If anything, if we continue on the same policies, which have failed miserably, we are certain to achieve nothing but failure.

          • 4 votes
          #1.68 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:57 PM EDT

          disappointed and ashamed:

          Anytime, bro.

          • 3 votes
          #1.69 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:03 PM EDT

          I know Italy legalized heroin for awhile and wound up with 40k more addicts then they repealed and criminalized it again..they were trying to weaken the mafia over there by doing that..access to coke and pot might make a few more addicts but if you want to work and theirs a drug screening you will not do drugs..if you care about your life...

            #1.70 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:16 PM EDT

            mowdy5gs

            It is Mexico that the goper's wish to immolate to a T.

            Immolate: to kill or destroy often by fire

            Sounds like a plan to me.

            • 1 vote
            #1.71 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:32 PM EDT

            Joseph:

            I haven't heard or read about Italy's heroin program. I did read about the Swiss heroin program that had positive results. Maybe Italy went about it all wrong. I'll have to read up on it to learn the facts.

            I would never advocate anyone to use hard drugs like heroin or meth. But, marijuana, on the other hand, should NEVER been made illegal.

            access to coke and pot might make a few more addicts but if you want to work and theirs a drug screening you will not do drugs.

            I know there are many people from all walks of life that do drugs and have jobs, some of them professional jobs. Drug testing doesn't really stop most people, except maybe poor people who don't have the resources to get around drug test. You'd be surprised how many pot smokers out there that are successful, tax paying, contributors to society.

            .if you care about your life...

            Oh, I care about my life. I also care about other people's lives and it infuriates me to no end to see the damage this useless drug war has wrecked upon the lives of our citizens and the lives of the Mexican people. Anyone who supports this war should be ashamed.

            • 1 vote
            #1.72 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:42 PM EDT

            My oh my how the socialist/liberals get upset when we knock their President like they did with Bush. The fact of the matter is Eric Holder and Obama has added to the problem down there. Ask the President...wait he will just ask for executive privilege and not answer.

              #1.73 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:52 PM EDT

              Corrupted cops killing other cops in broad daylight. Customs agents paying the price for the gov't seizing a ton a of coke. Has anyone gotten the clue yet that there is no level they won't stoop to?

              .... and how much do you want to bet that Janet Napolitano will STILL deny that the cartel is a serious enough threat to secure the border???

                #1.74 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:27 PM EDT

                This is probably true, however, cutting the cost of incarcerating a million people and of the cat and mouse game over pot would put a nice dent in the spending.

                No, it's more like you'd get to smoke as much weed as you can get away with and not have to worry about getting busted, so let's cut the phony altruism bullsh!t. This is about your own self-indulgence.

                So you might not get a winfall from the taxes but you would in budget cuts. And, it would likely create a few entrepreneurs and "job creators" in the process.

                Once again, the real money (and violence) is over coke, heroin and meth. I'm more than happy to pay for incarcerating those people who would be out of control of left to their own devices if they were free to do whatever on the outside.

                The fallacy here is that the current system is preventing anyone that wants to get from doing it. There is more weed and coke out there than there was before Nixon started this idiotic war on drugs.

                The war on drugs began long before Tricky Dick and the 60s. You're going to have to convince Congress to repeal those laws. Good luck. lol...

                • 1 vote
                #1.75 - Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:32 AM EDT

                Agnon Mema wrote: "Because drugs actually ruin lives and wreck families."

                Well, the same could be said for most U.S. corporations...especially the "financial services" sector...

                • 3 votes
                #1.76 - Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:22 AM EDT

                Because drugs actually ruin lives and wreck families.

                So does alcohol and thats legal. Looks like your going to have to find a better excuse than that...

                • 1 vote
                #1.77 - Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:35 PM EDT

                Don41331:

                Once again, the real money (and violence) is over coke, heroin and meth.

                Marijuana still remains the number one profit for the drug cartels. Estimates are between 60-80 percent of the total profit from illegal drug trafficking. All of the violence is associated with illegal drug trafficking.

                The war on drugs began long before Tricky Dick and the 60s. You're going to have to convince Congress to repeal those laws. Good luck. lol...

                Actually, drugs were illegalized back in the 30s but the Drug War was pushed by Nixon first, and by Reagan in the 80s.

                The Drug War can't go on forever. Pot legalization is just around the corner (I give it 3 years for the Feds). It's not a matter of "if", it's a matter of "when".

                • 1 vote
                #1.78 - Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:35 PM EDT

                American Citizen-1779594

                LOL it's already $400 an oz. for certain strands..From what i see on t.v... :P

                  #1.79 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 5:35 PM EDT

                  Legalizing drugs does not mean that the guy working next to you is out of his mind doped up. He wouldn't get the job any easier than a lush. If he controlled his use and didn't let it interfere with his association with other people or work, what's wrong? He comes in on his ass from the night before, he's out, and it's tough to get another job with that on the record. You think your daughter or son is going to hook up with a loser like that? Then it's your family that needs help.

                  Legalize, then let the fallout hit those that can't control their urges or adictions. All you that think a MJ user is a hard drug addict probably work with, go to church with, and generally associate with more potheads than straights and don't have a clue. A coke (not crack) user is close to the same level of associative functioning but has a higher probability of screwing up his life, about the same as an alcoholic. Horse, amphetimines, and designer drugs as far as I'm concerned, are lost causes and live in their own world. They don't interact with society and so are not generally going to intersect your life.

                  Legalize and save lives.

                    #1.80 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 11:25 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    Comment author avatarDodger-891678Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                    Weapons supplied by Obama Bait, Tackle and Guns in Laredo, no doubt.

                    • 32 votes
                    #2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:18 AM EDT
                    Comment author avatarbarock1957Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                    stop the crapp with President Obama !!! killings have gone on way before he was elected !! Why don't you blame the NRA for a change ??? because they are the ones responsible for this and all the shootings in america !!

                    The NRA and republicans put into your head that guns were a normal thing to have and that it is a symbol of freedom and you stupid idiots believe them... but what they forgot to tell you is that, you will never have your guns with you when you really need them, and that you can run from a knife but you cannot run from a bullet !!!

                    Guns do not belong in a civilized society, Pal ! the far west is long gone !!!

                    I feel sorry for all mexican people, for sure the americans are responsible for this as they are responsible for many of the world problems and crimes.

                    You are a sick people !!!

                    My nephew has just got married with a mexican girl but yet, he is french.. I am glad she won't have to return there !

                    • 22 votes
                    #2.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:33 AM EDT

                    but what they forgot to tell you is that, you will never have your guns with you when you really need them.

                    Thanks to all the dumbocraps that passed laws disallowing law abiding citizens from being able to defend themselves from the democrats voting base criminals. After all the only political party that advocates giving voting rights back to convicted felons is the democrat party. Such a desperate political party that they advocate crap like this and don't care who gets to vote whether they are citizens or not.

                    One has to show their union card to vote in a union election but heaven forbid if you have to show an ID to vote in a general election. The stupidity is deafening.

                    • 38 votes
                    #2.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:04 AM EDT
                    Comment author avatardavefromdanapointcaExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                    BTW barock, their are quite a few democrats that support the 2nd ammendment and belong to the NRA. I was one of them until I wised up and changed parties.

                    • 21 votes
                    #2.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:06 AM EDT

                    Wait, let's me get this straight. You guys defend gun rights by saying regardless, criminals will always get theirs guns.

                    Now you are saying that Obama responsible for all guns fight?

                    Make up your mind.

                    Furthermore, they are police, use your brains where they got theirs gun.

                    • 22 votes
                    #2.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:25 AM EDT

                    now the NRA is responsible for the shootout at the OK Corral

                    • 11 votes
                    #2.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:31 AM EDT

                    CuongDNguyen

                    If you ban guns then the criminals will still get guns by people who will make them in their garage on a simple lathe and sell them on the black market. It isn't that hard as I make parts for my firearms all the time. As a target shooter, I often make new barrels and recievers for my target pistols and rifles all the time. And you know what? It is all legal for me to do so. But go ahead and ban them as I would like to start working from home. I know for a fact I could make tons of money selling unregistered firearms to people wanting them.

                    Also, go ahead and ask a cop if he wants to go around taking guns away from all the law abiding citizens if guns are banned? He will tell you "Hell No" as he knows that wouldn't be a good idea. To much chance of getting shot.

                    • 10 votes
                    #2.7 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:45 AM EDT
                    Comment author avatarChrisWankerExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                    Furthermore, they are police, use your brains where they got their gun.

                    That's exactly what I was thinking while reading the above brainless ramblings about it being Obama's fault. Come on guys! You can do a better job pushing your pathetic NRA / Teabagger crap than this!!!

                    • 16 votes
                    #2.8 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:09 AM EDT

                    The only guilty people are those that are using drugs. And please do not tell me that it's a "disease", like some people say that "obesity" is a disease.

                    It's just that Americans are already using drugs since they are 8 or 9 years old. The problem of drugs is HERE in this country. It's not Obama. It's YOUR CHILDREN getting drugs because of peer pressure, and the availablity of them in the corner of your house.

                    Someone needs to take the lead again of Nancy Reagan to tell children "Just say NO" Nothing else seems to be working.

                    • 1 vote
                    #2.10 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:34 AM EDT

                    Dodger,

                    Where you upset when Reagan, Bush & North sold weapons to Iran? Or do you only get mad when a Democrat does it as part of a sting gone wrong?

                    • 17 votes
                    #2.11 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:40 AM EDT
                    Comment author avatarThinkforyourself-2427469Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                    [Obama] did send a bunch of weapons down there, and Mexicans are dying because of it. That man has tarnished our image long enough.

                    Obama is not the right man for the office of president.

                    Jesus. Seriously... you guys are just so full of blind hatred, you're just making things up. He's Kenyan, he's Muslim, he's a socialist or a communist depending on distressed you are at any given moment, and now, apparently he's personally arming drug lords in Mexico... there is simply no rational discourse possible with you people. I can't believe you get the same one vote that sane people get. It's alarming.

                    • 23 votes
                    #2.12 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:59 AM EDT

                    Well, he is a Kenyan, and has said so in the past. Look it up.

                    • 18 votes
                    #2.13 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:17 AM EDT

                    Yes and a man is really going to make everything better and by the way im joking find it funny to think people think that it matters who they vote for anymore its all so corrupt what a joke

                    • 9 votes
                    #2.14 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:22 AM EDT

                    THINKFORYOURSELF.....If you check close enuf, you'll see Holder and Nobama fingerprints on those guns used in the airport....Legalize drugs?...Now there would be an interesting world to live in...nobama had his day in the sunshine, its time to put him back in the shade....

                    • 14 votes
                    #2.15 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:41 AM EDT

                    sorry ophot-it was not a sting gone wrong. It was an attempt to make gun sales resposible for gun violence in mayhico so that stricter laws could address the fabricated problem.

                    • 5 votes
                    #2.16 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:42 AM EDT

                    No doubt??? I guess the guns that walked during Bush's tenure never caused any problems. This has been a bad government or ATF policy.

                    • 8 votes
                    #2.17 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:57 AM EDT

                    I knew some idiot would blame Bush. But we also got one blaming North and Reagan. When does anything become this administration's fault? Never I guess. It's what libs do best, blame someone else.

                    • 9 votes
                    #2.18 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:29 AM EDT

                    "Thinkforyourself" responds to a comment that mentions a true incident (botched Fast and Furious Operation) and the commenter's opinion of the administration because of that incident by engaging in an unfounded ad-hominem attack (accusation of hatred being the motive for the comment), and then an appeal to ridicule fallacy.

                    You hardly think for yourself. You're brainwashed.

                    • 1 vote
                    #2.19 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:38 AM EDT

                    Gosh, I finally get it! Obama took all the guns away from the U.S. citizens so he could ship them to Mexico for use in the drug wars. You guys are ucking futz!

                    • 3 votes
                    #2.20 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:46 AM EDT

                    I don't understand why the Republicans are upset about "Fast & Furious" when they claim: "Guns don't kill people--PEOPLE kill people" right?

                    • 6 votes
                    #2.21 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:00 AM EDT

                    Someone needs to take the lead again of Nancy Reagan to tell children "Just say NO" Nothing else seems to be working.

                    Right, 'cause we obviously know how well that worked.

                    Here's the funny part: while Nancy was telling us to say no, her husband's CIA was importing coke by the ton to arm the Nicaraguans while sending the Iranians a few toys.

                    WTF was up with arming Iran anyway? Hadn't they just taken a bunch of American hostages and had an Islamic revolution in 79? I guess they needed the cash for their little illegal wars to bolster dictatorships in Central America (like their buddies Dabuison, Somoza, and Noriega).

                    You can't make @!$%# like that up.

                    • 4 votes
                    #2.22 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:14 AM EDT

                    Dave from whever, The Democratic party doesn't want the UN to rule America. We get what we can out of it, and that's all we do withy the UN. It's OK to hate Democrats, but please stick to the facts in your posts. You don't have to accept something from Fox News as facts, because usually it's propaganda.

                    • 2 votes
                    #2.23 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:35 AM EDT

                    davefromdanapointca

                    CuongDNguyen

                    If you ban guns then the criminals will still get guns by people who will make them in their garage on a simple lathe and sell them on the black market. It isn't that hard as I make parts for my firearms all the time. As a target shooter, I often make new barrels and recievers for my target pistols and rifles all the time. And you know what? It is all legal for me to do so. But go ahead and ban them as I would like to start working from home. I know for a fact I could make tons of money selling unregistered firearms to people wanting them.

                    Also, go ahead and ask a cop if he wants to go around taking guns away from all the law abiding citizens if guns are banned? He will tell you "Hell No" as he knows that wouldn't be a good idea. To much chance of getting shot.

                    Do you actually believe that garbage? Do you honestly think it is so easy to fashion a gun from parts found in a garage? And, do you expect anyone that has dealt with weapons to believe that you make barrels and receivers "all the time?" Your argument fails because, all one has to do is look at countries where guns have been banned or severely restricted. Gun violence is almost non existent in those countries. And, if guns are banned, and someone refuses to give it up, they wouldn't be "law abiding citizens." They would be criminals.

                    • 2 votes
                    #2.24 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:06 AM EDT

                    raddave,

                    Exactly!!!

                    Japan, where I am currently residing, is one of those countries. Gun violence is so non-existent that if a gun is confiscated, it makes national news. So non-existent that if a police officer points his gun at a perp, it makes national news.

                      #2.25 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:52 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      Another fine example of journalistic excellence from MSNBC.

                      I'm wondering why the no one edited the headline on the title page which, in part, said "Panic as Cops Shoot Dead Cops..." I believe in economy with words, but not when they change the meaning of the message entirely. "Fatal Shootout between Cops at Mexico City Airport" maybe?

                      • 8 votes
                      Reply#3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:28 AM EDT

                      Momcat, they aren't much better than the National Enquirer. They usually try to add their spin on it too.

                      • 2 votes
                      #3.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:30 AM EDT

                      this is the kind of bs houndthepress.com will spank the media for.

                        #3.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:48 AM EDT

                        "Travelers run for cover as cops kill cops at Mexico City airport"

                        Which part of the headline do you object to? Is that not what happened in a nutshell?

                        I have a question for y'all: why do you bother reading your news on this site when it obviously bothers you? Sounds to me like you may be happier getting your fair and balanced news elsewhere.

                        • 5 votes
                        #3.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:32 AM EDT

                        Momcat99

                        MSNBC can't help it thier official journalistic approach is to twist everything in thier non stop attempt to make Obama look better than he ever was or ever will be and less of a threat to our country than is really happening.

                        • 7 votes
                        #3.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:10 AM EDT

                        Nah, I see his point. Cops shoot dead cops, would litterally mean that the police were shooting at the corpses of cops who died already. We of course know they don't mean that, so didn't read the headline quite that literally, the first time... The direct meaning of the headline, without understanding it in a more reasonable manner, would actually seem a bit perposterious. Why would anyone spend there time shooting at cadabers?

                          #3.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:20 AM EDT

                          All I can say is thank goodness Mexico has such strict gun laws, it has really helped stem the violence there. LOL

                          • 9 votes
                          #3.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:27 AM EDT

                          Well they tried but what good is that when Obamas cabinet is giving them all the weapons they need

                          • 7 votes
                          #3.7 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:56 AM EDT

                          yeah because no guns flowed over the border until obama came into office... Its disgusting how much disrespect this president has recieved and before anyone tries to bring up liberals and bush please point out a time where bush was rudely interrupted while giving a speech or had a govenor stick their finger in his face. I get it you dont like obama but he is the potus and that alone deserves respect.

                          • 3 votes
                          #3.8 - Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:50 PM EDT

                          And what the @!$%# does this story have to do with US political parties anyway? What, don't the trolls have anything else to do today? Fox News, please, reopen up the commenting section on your site so these idiots can all go circle jerk each other in their own delusional habitat.

                          • 1 vote
                          #3.9 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 2:32 PM EDT

                          "Cops shoot cops dead" maybe?

                            #3.10 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 11:31 PM EDT
                            Reply

                            I hope the travel agents realize they should not be offering vacations in a war zone. Anyone agree that we need a real military presence on our border with Mexico? Mexico by the way has recently been declared "A failed Nation" by our own CIA.

                            http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101215537

                            http://theweek.com/article/index/92337/mexicos-failed-state-threat

                            http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/count-mexico-among-deadly-failed-states/

                            How about it MSN wouldn't you be doing your readers a service by adding your article to your travel section in addition to the link in the U.S. World news area?

                            • 11 votes
                            Reply#4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:44 AM EDT

                            Mexican culture is a criminal culture. If nothing else, keep it south of the border.

                            • 6 votes
                            #4.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:59 AM EDT

                            And just think, the Supreme Court threw out 2 of the 3 provisions from SB1070 (the one they didn't throw out though was the main provision the White House wanted stopped). And this decision had a dissenting opinion offered, that the law, and the case goes to the heart of the issue with state rights in securing their own borders, along with issues of public safety (aka police powers).... AKA, the dissenting view, they've now denied the states the very purpose of having police powers, itself...

                            • 4 votes
                            #4.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:26 AM EDT

                            This level of violence is appauling, but what do you expect from Mexico? These are the people that lefties want to let into this country. Furthermore, all of you who think this is limited to Mexico, think again, there are buildings in Texas that have actually been hit with bullets from shot outs in Mexico. There are people in Arizona that have been kidnapped by mules for the drug cartels, people that had absolutely nothing to do with the drug trade.

                            FInally, for all of you who think drugs should be legal let me ask you-who controls it? Do you want the gov't that cannot deliver a piece of mail on time, or stop 17 year olds from drinking, or enforce their own immigration laws to be in charge? Who decides when you can take drugs? Would you like your doctor to be able to smoke a big, ol' blunt before he operates on you? Would you like your child's school bus driver to shot up a little black tar before they drive your kids around? How about an airline pilot blowing a couple of lines in the cockpit while you hurl through the air at 700 mph in a tin can.

                            Anyone that thinks drugs should be legal obviously knows nothing about drugs and is therefore not in any position to argue. Just because you watch intervention does not make you an expert and as for the arguement about alcohol, let me explain something...that is the ENTIRE reason drugs are NOT legal. Because history has shown that once something is legal, you can not turn around and decide to criminalize it without serious consequences.

                            • 1 vote
                            #4.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:16 PM EDT

                            M_F_B:

                            Mexican culture is a criminal culture. If nothing else, keep it south of the border

                            Stereotype much?

                            I do believe you've seen too many spaghetti westerns. Try to come back to reality. The Mexican culture IS NOT a criminal culture. There a lot of good things that come from their culture that we here in the U.S. enjoy.

                            It's the drug cartels that are the criminal element and stain a beautiful country with many peaceful beautiful people.

                            • 2 votes
                            #4.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:32 PM EDT

                            DEMAR:

                            This level of violence is appauling, but what do you expect from Mexico?

                            Way to stereotype an entire ethnic group. Hate much?

                            FInally, for all of you who think drugs should be legal let me ask you-who controls it?

                            Who controls tobacco? Who controls alcohol? I don't see any reason why the government could regulate private industry in the selling of certain drugs (hard drugs would need special consideration).

                            Who decides when you can take drugs?

                            I didn't realize this was an issue. Possibly you are creating problems where they don't exist?

                            Would you like your doctor to be able to smoke a big, ol' blunt before he operates on you? Would you like your child's school bus driver to shot up a little black tar before they drive your kids around? How about an airline pilot blowing a couple of lines in the cockpit while you hurl through the air at 700 mph in a tin can.

                            Again, you are touting nightmare scenarios that would not be the case with legalization. All of the above, as it is now, would be illegal. Legalizing drugs would NOT be a license to be high on the job. People who would break these laws would lose their jobs and/or be prosecuted.

                            Anyone that thinks drugs should be legal obviously knows nothing about drugs and is therefore not in any position to argue.

                            How is this obvious? Because you said it so? What makes you the expert on what other people should think?

                            ...and as for the arguement about alcohol, let me explain something...that is the ENTIRE reason drugs are NOT legal.

                            Huh? There are many different reasons why drugs are illegal. Too many to post here without writing a book. But, let's see...

                            Because history has shown that once something is legal, you can not turn around and decide to criminalize it without serious consequences.

                            Um. Weren't all drugs legal at some point before they were made illegal? You argument doesn't make any sense. Care to expound?

                            • 1 vote
                            #4.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:07 PM EDT

                            Demar - While I can't speak for "lefties," I would think it's the people who are trying to escape the violence that they are ok with letting in, not the actual drug cartel members themselves.

                            I would also think that like tobacco, alchohol and firearms, drugs would be privatized and regulated by the government. Would things be perfect? Are they perfect with tobacco, alchohol and firearms?

                            If drugs were to be legalized, employers would still be able to regulate their use on the job. I don't show up to my job drunk so why would I think it would be ok to show up high? School bus drivers, surgeons, and airline pilots are not permitted to show up to work drunk so why would they be permitted to show up to work high? Would some people show up high? Probably. Do some people show up to work drunk? Probably. There are already rules in place for dealing with those situations.

                            I don't know why people think that if drugs were legal everyone would be drugged out of their minds like zombies. I don't do drugs because they're illegal - I don't do drugs because I need my mind to make money to live. If they were legal, I still would not do coke, heroin, meth, crack, mushrooms, etc. because I don't want to - I know the dangers of those drugs. If I could legally and safely get pot would I do it? Possibly while camping in the wilderness or while at home listening to Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon." But I have far too much to do to sit around high all the time. The same as I have far too much to do to sit around drunk all the time.

                            I will admit that the harder drugs cause a bit of a problem with the legalization theory just because people get so out of their minds on those types of drugs they can't really be functioning members of society. I do think it's time to try to come up with a different solution to the problem whatever that may be. The demand's not going away and the current solution does not appear to be working effectively.

                            • 2 votes
                            #4.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:13 PM EDT
                            Reply

                            Barock1957- Mexico has a law that no civilian can own a fire arm . How is that working out for them ? Not only that but the police and military have become the big coke dealers . How is that working for them ? And you have to remeber civilians can not own weapons . Now isn't that something to think about.

                            • 32 votes
                            #5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:45 AM EDT

                            Hank, if you are going to ask a person who wants to ban private ownership of guns to think, you may as well ask for world peace and the end to famine.

                            • 13 votes
                            #5.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:15 AM EDT

                            So, you say civilians can bring guns to the airport now?

                            Even in the US, if there is a shooting in the airport, it DOESN'T MATTER whether you can carry guns or not.

                              #5.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:26 AM EDT

                              barock 57 is an absolute Moe Rawn

                              • 8 votes
                              #5.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:32 AM EDT

                              What in the hell does the NRA have to do with this story people!? It happened IN MEXICO, at an AIRPORT (where OBVIOUSLY no guns would be allowed by passengers in the first place DUH) and it was between COPS. C.O.P.S. So what in the hell is a passerby gonna do with a damn gun!!! Shoot back? Geez, but keep flapping your gums about Obama and the NRA, like either have to do with the horrible state of Mexico.

                              • 13 votes
                              #5.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:54 AM EDT

                              What in the hell does the NRA have to do with this story people!?

                              I know that people are hot talking about the fiasco of "Fast and Furious" However, perhaps you missed the article that talks that most of the guns used by drulg dealers age LEGAL guns that they can readily buy here in this country.

                              All that they need to do is have them "cross the border illegaly"

                              Here is the link, so you can read it by yourself:

                              http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/08/new-player-in-mexicos-drug-war-the-nra/

                              • 5 votes
                              #5.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:53 AM EDT

                              "obama has GOT TO GO... and by the way, lets let mexicans do what mexicans do best,.. kill each other so they dont come here and take our jobs"

                              Jnt - I am very sorry you lost your job harvesting crops or doing landscaping. If you had a job that a desperate, uneducated, non-English speaking person can do, maybe you should have worked a little harder in school.

                              • 14 votes
                              #5.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:59 AM EDT

                              Be careful, IRESPOND. These people you're scolding don't respond favorably to facts.

                              • 7 votes
                              #5.7 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:01 AM EDT

                              obama has GOT TO GO... and by the way, lets let mexicans do what mexicans do best,.. kill each other

                              Oh PLEASE! That is just gang wars! Stop saying that the best that the Mexicans do is kill each other. You need to thank a Mexican TODAY for not paying $5.00 for a pound of produce at the store. Ask anybody that has a business and requires labor.

                              Hypocritical rhetoric.

                              • 7 votes
                              #5.8 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:03 AM EDT

                              Capt jim~ you have obviously swallowed the bullshoot that tells people that the jobs taken by illegals are lettuce picking and landscaping..and oh, yea....cleaning houses.

                              you are an ignorant pawn. come to chicago and look in any manufacturing plant and see how many American Citizens you can find. Construction? most laborers are now mexicans. Roofing? you are so gullible it is laughable!

                              • 6 votes
                              #5.9 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:25 AM EDT

                              YEAH,,,while you're at it you can also thank them for the bedbug infestations and swine flu out breaks they provided us with here as well............mexico is nothing but A THIRD WORLD SLUM WITH A SPILT BLOOD ECONOMY...and they are dragging all of this and their dope illegally across our borders everyday so yeahh... be thankful.

                              • 8 votes
                              #5.10 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:27 AM EDT

                              mexico is nothing but A THIRD WORLD SLUM WITH A SPILT BLOOD ECONOMY...and they are dragging all of this and their dope illegally across our borders

                              And nobody is forcing YOU and others to consume the drugs. I am not saying that Mexicans are "wonderful", but not ALL are criminals, and some actually are helpful to the economy here. Try to use some common sense and stop blaming others for our mistakes.

                              It's always someone else's fault. Sure! Take responsibility for your own ACTIONS and stop using drugs.

                              • 1 vote
                              #5.11 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:48 AM EDT

                              Ya know? Guns have been sold in the US to some of these parties in Mexico (albeit this article is talking about cops shooting each oher, and ostensibly officers wouldn't be bared from gun ownership), but this did not begin within the last 4 years, under the current administration, or anything of the like.

                              From 1997 until 2008 I lived in Albuquerque, NM. While I was living there, and prior to my moving back East (largely due to a certain lack of jobs, and finding a job elsewhere, and remember it's 2008 I'm talking about when considering the state of the economy as a back drop to the move), our own Congressional representative was trying to alert the Federal gov't to the fact that the gun smuggling from the US to Mexico was also taking place accross the border, even while the drug trafficing was going the other way.

                              Those of us in NM were aware of it, and we were aware of it long before Obama... This gun running (in many cases by the same individuals who were smuggling the drugs and people the other way) has been going on far longer then the last 3 or 4 years. And various individuals in those border states had been trying to alert the rest of the country to this fact for some time. It's probably another one of those situations whee AZ for instance is trying to alert people to just how bad it is on ranchers property which happens to be on the US/Mexico border, which is to say, they're practically in a state of war with these trafficers. On the other hand, the Fed, and yes this president (though others before who haven't taken a firm stance on this) don't seem to get just how bad things can be on the border towns.... At least with the New Mexico representatives, I think some were getting a little frustrated with their attempts to tell their fellow Congressmen, and the federal gov't at large, and having their advisements wrt what's trapsing through their own state, being largely ignored....

                              • 1 vote
                              #5.12 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:36 AM EDT

                              American, I had the misfortune of this once...

                              Had to move accross town, it was really wasn't more then a mile or so. When movers were hiered, the people who came turned out to be Spanish speaking, and they couldn't speak a word of English themselves. They used their own young daughter (she coudln't have been more then 6 or 7 years old) to translate for them. Betcha she didn't get payed for being their communications dept...

                              Well in any case, they showed up to the job 2.5 hours late, try to call them, (it was a Saturday), and no one who could speak English to answer the phone. So through the young girl, we had to communicate, and naturally after 2 hours what we felt like telling them wouldn't have been appropriate for the ears of a child. We bit our tongues, and held back on what we really wanted to tell these people, because there was no way to tell the responsible parties directly...

                              When they finally arrived, we had agreed on a large truck, they brought the smallest truck they could find... Communication barrier problem again. They had to make several trips, which wouldn't have been so bad if some of the furniture didn't fall out of the back of the truck, and onto the road. They stopped, picked it up, but IT WAS SMASHED into many pieces and good for the garbage then. Again, no way to voice my own thoughts wrt this, without having the young girl translate, again bit my lip, but getting a bit angry at this point...

                              If that wasn't all, the place I was moving into, on one of the trips, they not only left the front door unlocked (not a great idea several miles outside Trenton, NJ in one of the surrounding suburbs), but they left the front door wide open where anyone on the street could have seen a way in. The land lord wasn't happy, and chewed my ear out, on this. And no way to pass this on, without once again, only their young daughter knew English and they depended on her to do all the communication for them. Then, in moving the fridge in, they banged it up against all the walls, and dented them/put a few holes in the walls, in the process of getting it inside. They weren't all that careful.

                              All I can say after that, they didn't earn no ****ed tip, and I'd never recomend that bunch. If only there wasn't a language barrier, they would have got an earful themselves for all of that (especially after they caused me to get an earful from the land lord for their wrecking some walls and what not). It's totally unreasonable that someone should bother to run a business? and fail to understand the language of the customers. Or that they should use a 7 year old as an endentured servant to do all the translation for themselves. Part of business is being able to communicate with the customer. And some things a customer might have to communicate, with that sort of nonsense going on, would be things that would be appropriate for adult ears only. One shouldn't have to bite their tongue, and speak as one would to a child after property gets damaged, a place is left open to crooks (it's not over-exageration in this part of NJ, Trenton and surrounding area aren't without crime), and they're 2.5 hours late....

                              • 2 votes
                              #5.13 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:55 AM EDT

                              What a nightmare!

                              One question: was it cheaper?

                              • 1 vote
                              #5.14 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:24 PM EDT

                              I know a legitimate moving company with a performance bond would have cost more, but then you wouldn't have this entertaining story to tell. Did you count the silverware after or before they left?

                                #5.15 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 11:48 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                Mexico: The Place You Thought You Knew

                                ...and what you don't know can kill you!

                                • 6 votes
                                Reply#6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:53 AM EDT

                                "Welcome to sunny Mexico. Enjoy our many beaches, but don't stop to pick up severed heads you might find while strolling."

                                • 6 votes
                                #6.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:12 AM EDT

                                Make sure you and your kids spend your hard earned paychecks down there. Mexico is a failed narco state. So many poor people the 99% are trying to kidnap kids of the 1% for ransom. Up until you get kidnapped or shot those beaches and drinks seem like a deal, don't they ? Soon's you get kidnapped your relatives are calling the US gubmint to come get you. I tell you now I'm not interested in being taxed to send resources to Mexico to rescue your heiny. Keep your hieny out of that place - or take what you get !

                                • 4 votes
                                #6.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:14 AM EDT
                                Reply

                                Does this actually surprise anyone? That whole freaking country is corrupt.

                                • 15 votes
                                Reply#7 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:53 AM EDT

                                NOW will you legalize????????????

                                • 5 votes
                                #7.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:08 AM EDT

                                yes America is

                                • 2 votes
                                #7.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:27 AM EDT

                                Legalizing drugs will solve nothing, as was commented by other people above. The problem here is that there is a lot of money in drugs and the people running that business are probably the same people that chose who is going to run for President here. They will protect their business any way they can otherwise drug trafficking would have been slowed down or stopped a long time ago.

                                Note that the Taliban had eliminated traficking in Aftganistan before we invaded. Next day after we took them down, drug traficking was going full force.

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:31 AM EDT

                                Jibaro,

                                I'm not sure which point you are trying to make. Is it that the profit motive is what drives illegal drug sales so therefore legalizing the drugs would take out that profit motive and that's why legalization wouldn't work? I think that's what you just said - it's a little confusing.

                                Or is it that we need a more Taliban-like government here?

                                Please expand on your reasoning.

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:45 AM EDT

                                Jibaro:

                                Legalizing drugs will solve nothing,...

                                So, staying the course will?

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:30 PM EDT

                                American Citizen, if you don't like it, you are free to leave.

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:09 PM EDT

                                I vote w War ranger.

                                  #7.7 - Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:56 AM EDT

                                  So because American Citizen doesn't want to live in a fantasy world of "America can do no wrong", he or she should be forced out of his or her own country? What kinds of hypocrites are you, anyway? Seems to me like the US will only become greater if we see ourselves for who we are and try to make it better instead of lying to ourselves and pointing fingers at the rest of the world. If you are making the claim that the US is any less corrupt than Mexico, then you really need to take the blinders off.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #7.8 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 2:42 PM EDT

                                  But our corruption is mostly legal.

                                    #7.9 - Mon Jul 2, 2012 12:33 AM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    Comment author avatarCommon Sense EdExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                    Hank, arming the Mexican citizens won't stop what is happening. That will just result in more deaths. Many in the USA argue that"if you take guns away from law abiding citizens only criminals will have guns."

                                    Very true, but it misses the point. Reducing the number of guns will result in less deaths from accidental shootings and shootings from "crimes of passion." No, you won't be able to shoot an intruder but the net difference will save many more lives.

                                    Banning guns is a solution but a very long term solution. It will take many years, decades perhaps, before gun seizures from criminals and attrition reduce the available supply enough to make a real difference.

                                    • 4 votes
                                    Reply#8 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:03 AM EDT

                                    Ed, by banning guns in the U.S., do you think that the criminals would happily turn in their unregistered guns because all of the sudden they are illegal to own?

                                    You need to put down the crack pipe if you think so.

                                    The 2nd ammendment was very clear why the right to own guns is important to the life and longevity of this country and that was to keep a tyrannical government at bay. In essence, the citizens who exercise their right to own firearms protects all the other rights in the Bill of Rights. Including your 1st amendment right to say stupid stuff like you just spouted off in you post.

                                    • 14 votes
                                    #8.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:18 AM EDT

                                    Why not just do it like a normal person would do anything and tackle the PROBLEM? Criminals with guns. Yes, Prohibition worked really, really well.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #8.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:20 AM EDT

                                    Ed I did not say arm the people . You missed what I was saying . What I was saying was only the police and criminals have weapons every one else is caught in the middle . And you know the politians will only go where they think is best for them . to the side carrying the guns which is power. Ask any world leader who controls the guns has the power.

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #8.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:23 AM EDT

                                    common sense Ed has none

                                    • 5 votes
                                    #8.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:34 AM EDT

                                    Hank, you mentioned Mexico having a law that citizens cannot own guns. That implies there wouldn't be as much violence if the citizens did have guns. That's simply not true.

                                    No, criminals won't turn in their guns. To think otherwise is foolish. However, banning gun ownership WILL eventually cut off the supply so that, in time, fewer and fewer criminals will have access to guns. It will take a long time for that to occur, but it is a goal worth pursuing.

                                    I'm glad you realize the 2nd amendment is there so citizens can oppose a tyrannical government. Many people think it is so citizens can protect themselves from criminals. However, at the time of the writing of the 2nd amendment the citizenry was the army. That has changed. Having an armed population isn't necessary to prevent the government from tyranny. Many countries get along just fine without gun ownership.

                                    Careful thought and simple observation demonstrates that private gun ownership is not necessary. Changing the laws would have a short term negative effect as crime would probably increase, but in the long term it will have much more beneficial results.

                                    • 7 votes
                                    #8.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:10 AM EDT

                                    The 2nd ammendment was very clear why the right to own guns is important to the life and longevity of this country and that was to keep a tyrannical government at bay.

                                    I don't care which side of the gun debate you're on, NO reasonable person would argue that the 2nd amendment was "very clear." It's actually just about the least clear thing in the entire Bill of Rights. If it had been more clearly worded, it wouldn't have wound up in the Supreme Court being debated THERE.

                                    Fail.

                                    • 5 votes
                                    #8.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:04 AM EDT

                                    Commonsense ed....you had better rename yourself, because you have no common sense!....dam democrats anyway.,...

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #8.7 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:45 AM EDT

                                    "think for yourself", "common sense", etc. These user names were created by people who lack those abilities.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #8.8 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:40 AM EDT

                                    Well Ed, in Puerto Rico to get a gun you have to go through a process that few people can complete. I was denied a gun because I was not the head of my household. It has been like that since we were invaded by the US in 1898 but criminals have all kinds of guns available to them.

                                    You see, the people who make guns sell their stuff one way or the other. By restricting guns all that is accomplished is that decent people will be unarmed. That is it.

                                    • 4 votes
                                    #8.9 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:44 AM EDT

                                    Sammy Johns

                                    "think for yourself", "common sense", etc. These user names were created by people who lack those abilities.

                                    Do you have anything to actually back up or validate your assertion, or do you just like to throw baseless insults around to make yourself feel better about your own shortcomings?

                                    Not that my nickname here advertises my own ability to think for myself (if you can read for comprehension, you'll note that the term "thinkforyourself" actually admonishes others to do that), but hey... I actually DO think for myself, all the same, and you've no logical reason to assume that I don't.

                                    Next time, try contributing something useful to the conversation instead of just lowering the quality of discourse for everyone with meaningless insults.

                                      #8.10 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:04 AM EDT

                                      davefromdanapointca

                                      Ed, by banning guns in the U.S., do you think that the criminals would happily turn in their unregistered guns because all of the sudden they are illegal to own?

                                      You need to put down the crack pipe if you think so.

                                      The 2nd ammendment was very clear why the right to own guns is important to the life and longevity of this country and that was to keep a tyrannical government at bay. In essence, the citizens who exercise their right to own firearms protects all the other rights in the Bill of Rights. Including your 1st amendment right to say stupid stuff like you just spouted off in you post.

                                      Show me in the second amendment where it states the purpose is to keep a tyrannical government at bay. What's that? It doesn't say that, but says, a "well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State?" the intention of the 2nd amendment was to defend this country, when we had real standing Army. We no longer rely on militias to do that, so the amendment is outdated.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #8.11 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:11 AM EDT

                                      Jibaro, do you expect anyone who knows better to believe that crap you posted?

                                        #8.12 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:12 AM EDT

                                        Hank, it is a right wing myth that guns are banned in Mexico. They are not. In fact, the Mexican Constitution gives the citizens the right to own guns, just like in this country. The reason most people don't own guns in Mexico is because they are so expensive, because they must be purchased from the corrupt government.

                                          #8.13 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:16 AM EDT

                                          For those who disagree with my post and wish to claim I have no common sense, please feel free to demonstrate exactly what I said that isn't correct, or indicative of common sense.

                                            #8.14 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:02 PM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            Lol, All because of the US need for drugs.

                                            • 7 votes
                                            Reply#9 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:06 AM EDT

                                            LOL, All because of the US need to control people's lives and fighting a useless failed drug war.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #9.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:32 PM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            Legalize marijuana. Half of your problem is then gone. Alcohol is legal, cigarettes are legal, ( and cigarettes have been proven to cause death ). Pot is no worse than either of them. Not that I am advocating pot, far from it. I think drugs are for weak minded individuals whom can't handle reality. I just think it would be a large burden off the backs of society and our legal/judicial system. In case no one has noticed it, pot has become the major source of income for your cartels. Legalize it and it is no longer profitable to them. BINGO! One less thing to kill each other over.

                                            Only my two cents worth.

                                            • 10 votes
                                            Reply#10 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:28 AM EDT

                                            Sure, I understand your point. There are just so many negatives with letting it all be legal. Hmmm, lets see, Cigarettes are legal...and they kill more than a five million people a year . Alcohol is legal, it kills more than 100,000 a year just in America alone, 45% due to car accidents. We have so many crazy new drugs out there. Everyone says legalize it, control it, it will break the cartels down..BS, when it is legal, every Cartel will want to run the street monopoly. Last thing I want is someone weak minded, avoiding reality with a chip on his shoulder, Drunk ,strung out on coke,smoking weed, and totting a loaded gun.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #10.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:16 AM EDT

                                            Drunk ,strung out on coke,smoking weed, and totting a loaded gun.

                                            Fear monger much?

                                            I see you listed the deaths tied to using cigarettes and alcohol. Why not the deaths tied to smoking cannabis? Probably because they can not tie a single death to it.

                                            You say there are so many negatives tied to legalizing it, yet you do not list a single one. You responded to a post about making cannabis legal, not cocaine. Did you feel that you had to add that in for dramatic effect?

                                            Just go ahead and rally to keep something illegal that doesn't promote violence when consumed. Keep locking up cannabis smokers because they are non violent and are an easy source of revenue for the private prison system.

                                            It says quite a bit that you had to throw in cocaine and firearms to make cannabis look bad.

                                            avoiding reality with a chip on his shoulder

                                            This pretty much sums up your response.

                                            • 12 votes
                                            #10.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:50 AM EDT

                                            alltheluck

                                            it kills more than 100,000 a year just in America alone, 45% due to car accidents

                                            I get where you are going with your points but PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE fact check yourself and provide links to where you are getting your distorted numbers.. HOW can alcohol be killing 45% in car accidents annually if that would equal 45000 and TOTAL traffic fatalities is only in the mid 30k. I won't do your research for you but believe the alcohol related vehicle deaths is in the neighborhood of 16k annually.

                                            That alone makes the rest of your argument appear to be suspect.

                                            We can debate the legalization of certain drugs when you can get your facts in order. That would include possession of a firearm while under the influence and who could legally sell controlled substances. There is a tax stamp on tobacco for a reason.

                                            • 8 votes
                                            #10.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:53 AM EDT

                                            I think your brains are already fried with the use of drugs. That is why our country is being destroyed by you know who.....who was also a drug user. I think his brain has been fried so dry that their is nothing left except the desire to destroy our country.

                                            • 5 votes
                                            #10.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:24 AM EDT

                                            Oh you must be talking about George Bush! The current leader inherited the nightmare from the dumbest president in modern history! The only person dumb enough to call Australians, Austrians. And.... dont forget sitting with children blank stared when he heard the words "Mr President, our country is under attack" 6 long minutes! Who had the canjones to go after Bin Laden? while the chimp was seeking oil for his daddy at the expense of lives and the surplus Clinton left and Cheney was raking in his retirment for halliburton! You cant even put those two men in the same category as far as intelligence and class. What an embarrassment Bush 2 was. OMG.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #10.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:35 AM EDT

                                            And if we call Obama dumb...its because we are racist. So its okay to do it to a republican but not okay for the Messiah. Obama will be the downfall of our great country and I am so sorry he was ever elected.....not because he is black but because he has no idea what he is doing. My dear, Obama is an embarassment to our country bowing to all of the world leaders. Call me racist now....... anyway we all know you drank all the koolaid and more. Sorry for you come November when he is voted out and I do hope you lose your job to an illegal immigrant.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #10.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:36 PM EDT

                                            @ alltheluck,

                                            You did notice in my post that I stated to legalize it? That would entail controlling it like cigarettes and alcohol. Sell it, tax it, just as you would the other two. I don't see the cartels with a monopoly on tobacco or alcohol, I don't see people clandestinely growing tobacco plants in their yard or with hooch stills in their basements. It has been scientifically proven to be less harmful than either cigarettes or alcohol. Your argument about cartels controlling or monopolizing the flow holds no water and is farcical at best. How could they if it is legal and able to be purchased at stores by consenting adults of legal age, ( 18-21 )? Don't bring minors into the equation, it is illegal for under 18 to purchase smokes or under 21 to purchase alcohol, but they still sometimes can. That argument is going nowhere also.

                                            Legalize it and you take the illicit profitability away from the cartels. It is no longer worth it if the cost is the same as a pack of cigarettes or a bottle of whiskey. It also gives another local, state and federal tax base and clears a large burden on the judicial system and jails.

                                            • 3 votes
                                            #10.7 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:26 PM EDT

                                            Brilliantly stated, War Ranger. I absolutely agree.

                                              #10.8 - Sun Jul 1, 2012 2:48 PM EDT
                                              Reply

                                              All the drug users in the USA bear full responsibility for all the drug related violence in Mexico and the USA. All this death and violence so you can get your little high. You will all rot in hell with your drugs. Sober up.

                                              • 4 votes
                                              Reply#11 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:55 AM EDT

                                              Why sober up if I am going to burn in hell? Pffft.. I might as well enjoy myself now right?

                                              • 6 votes
                                              #11.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:40 AM EDT

                                              Here Here Airthief!

                                                #11.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:00 PM EDT

                                                mikeyknows:

                                                All the drug users in the USA bear full responsibility for all the drug related violence in Mexico and the USA

                                                All the prohibitionists bear full responsibility for all the drug related violence in Mexico and the USA.

                                                Mike, it's the drug war and drug prohibition that is the ROOT CAUSE of all the violence and deaths associated with illegal drug trafficking.

                                                  #11.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:49 PM EDT

                                                  Air Thief,

                                                  I don't do drugs nor condone it in any way, but you must be a genius with an IQ of 200. That is probably one of the best responses I have read on here.

                                                    #11.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:54 PM EDT
                                                    Reply
                                                    Comment author avatarRufus Cfysovia Facebook

                                                    This is a serious matter,shut douwn the airport nd inverstigate how this happened.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    Reply#12 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:56 AM EDT

                                                    Read the article again. They know who did it, why, and how. They shut down the crime scene and they have circulated the identification of the perps. Seems more effecient than what we do.

                                                      #12.1 - Mon Jul 2, 2012 12:44 AM EDT
                                                      Reply

                                                      Legalize, regulate, and tax and most all of this violence will go away. It has in other countries where this approach has been tried. When will we Americans ever get it? Most of this violence in Mexico and now more and more within our borders is because of a failed drug policy.

                                                      • 7 votes
                                                      Reply#13 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:57 AM EDT

                                                      Everyone can say what they want, Be it about the drugs,the gangs, or the people themselves. The truth is , this stuff would not be happening if the demand for the drugs weren't coming from the US !!! It's all the drug addicts we have here, and being the passage way to Canada, It will never end. Wait until it spills onto our soil.

                                                        Reply#14 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:04 AM EDT

                                                        alltheluck when you said "wait until it spills onto our soil" I think that you are a bit late on that one. It already has. Ask anyone living in N.Y. City, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Dallas, Houston, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Miami, and the list goes on. There is drug related crime in evey major city of the U.S. today. Much of it is related directly to the various cartels in Mexico and South America as they are using our young gang members as mules to make up the pipe line for their products within the U.S.

                                                        Five or six years ago I read an article about "The Corporation" that was a drug ring run by one of the cartels out of Columbia as I recall. They were buying brand new trucks and vans in So. Florida and Texas, loading them up with drugs, driving them to the various delivery points then abandoning or burning them. The story about how they worked was really quite interesting and showed the extent of involvement here locally in the U.S. They were also buying old retired airliners from the various airlines and using them on one-way missions to various destinations in Europe as well. That has subsided since many European countries like Portugal and Holland have taken a different approach to the drug problem and are succeeding in putting it to rest there. We are the slow ones. LOL

                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        #14.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:17 AM EDT
                                                        Reply

                                                        "It's surprising to see it happening at the airport. It's one of the safest places in the city," Gray told the AP.

                                                        If the airport is the "safest" I'm quite sure I don't want to visit anywhere in Mexico.

                                                        I am a little confused though.. Were all 5 "cops". Federal police or were the 3 who left the airport imposters or the two dead ones? Another "well written" story by BSNBC.

                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        Reply#15 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:09 AM EDT

                                                        I think we need to stay the HELL out of Mexico and ban travel there altogether!!!! It's a shame because 30-40 years ago Acapulco and Cabo and all those places were considered beautiful travel destinations. Who needs it now? And I agree, if this happened at an airport in the U.S. it would have been shut down. Mexico needs to get it's act together, maybe if all U.S. citizens boycott it, they'll get the message.

                                                        • 4 votes
                                                        Reply#16 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:12 AM EDT

                                                        Days4U - 30 years ago I was in Mexico City driving - I got pulled over

                                                        You go through red light - $50,000 pesos - no I didn't

                                                        You go through red light - $5,000 pesos - no I didn't

                                                        You go through red light - $500 pesos - fine leave me alone

                                                        The banditos were always the cops

                                                        Try filling up a tank of gas - they point to the top gauge not the actually one

                                                        Mexico has always been corrupt - but not to this extent

                                                        I don't know what the answer is it is a way of life to lie and cheat

                                                        • 6 votes
                                                        #16.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:24 AM EDT
                                                        Reply

                                                        And coming to a border town near you.

                                                        • 9 votes
                                                        Reply#17 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:16 AM EDT

                                                        Yeah, get a good look, that'll be America in 10 years.

                                                        • 6 votes
                                                        Reply#18 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:17 AM EDT

                                                        Nguyen, Vietnam is lovely this time of year and an absolutly horrible place to visit. Why not go home and see what your little affair with guns and drugs caused. You other weak morons doing drugs are killing people and your brains are rotting. By the way, I wasn't one of the 'cool bruthas' doing dope in VN.

                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        Reply#19 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:19 AM EDT

                                                        NamVeteran - I've been to Vietnam every 3 years for the past decade, and you're right, it IS a lovely place to visit. The first thing you notice is that there is hardly ANY crime. The second thing you notice is that people go out of their way to help you out, are pleasant, and seem to forget that we bombed the crap out of them for 15 years. Third, drug use is almost non-existant, and the last thing anyone wants to do is run afoul of the law, create havoc, or run amock (unlike in the USA). Drugs ARE a bane in THIS country and other countries that create counter-cultures than admire their illicit use. Listen to some RAP music, go to San Francisco, assess the real purpose of half the medical mariguana facilities. Drugs, like guns, aren't killig people - it's PEOPLE KILLING PEOPLE and people blaming the plant for the inability of those that have been elected to protect us to DO SO. Want to clean up drug use in this country - make drug use, dealing, and transporting punishable by death with a mandatory 90 days to execution. Want to clean up drug use and cartels in Mexico, send the 82nd Airborne across the border, destory every cartel, processing point and anyone that gets in their way, and in the USA make it immediate execution for anyone caught selling, supporting, or belonging to a cartel. Works in Vietnam, and don't preach to me, I'm a Nam vet as well.

                                                          #19.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:48 AM EDT

                                                          That's too bad. It was excellent. I swear it was a PTSD preventative. You have to work pretty hard to stress a Spec4 who just burned a half a joint of Cambodian Red, or Thai Stick, at all, let alone traumatically.

                                                          I feel really bad for the kids in the middle East. No booze, no pot, no short time. What the hell kind of war is that anyway? Nothing but Facebook and video games between patrols. They're going to be coming home really messed up.

                                                          Now to rerail. Did you know that for the past three years or so, the Cartels have been having some of their new recruits, with clean records, enlist in the US military, for the training and experience? They get two paychecks, one from the Army or the Marines, and one from the Cartel. They'll be coming home too.

                                                          It's time to at least legalize marijuana, before the poop really hits the propeller. With 30 million regular pot smokers in the US, it's the biggest money maker for the Cartels, by far. There is no way they can replace the income they would lose if we legalized pot. People who think the Cartels would just make it up by selling hard drugs aren't thinking it through. Meth, coke and heroin are the cheapest and easiest to get they've ever been. Anyone stupid enough to want them is getting them already. The Cartels have no possible new market to replace the market they would lose, if the US made it legal for us to grow and sell our own.

                                                          • 2 votes
                                                          #19.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:11 AM EDT
                                                          Reply

                                                          We called our fight 'the war on drugs' but it was a joke. If we had given the General in charge enough men and access to planes and weapons, then the drug cartels would at least respect us, but the way it is they are willing to do anything to win, are we aren't allowing our men and women to do what it takes, so we lose all around.Politics all around, and I wouldn't even be surprised at who all in Washington is getting their retirement this way.

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          Reply#20 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:22 AM EDT
                                                          Kim JungIlDeleted

                                                          Well, this is Mexico. So what else is new?

                                                          • 6 votes
                                                          Reply#22 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:31 AM EDT

                                                          Feels like an assassination to me.

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #22.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:27 AM EDT
                                                          Reply

                                                          Lawless backward and evil society. This is why we need to enforce our immigration laws and keep out these criminals. Mexico breeds criminal behavior. Their entire nation from top to bottom is narco terror state. Gangs, guns and drugs should be on their flag. Mexican's have been systematically destroying the U.S. for decades with welfare abuse, and gang/drug violence. Wish we had leadership that was not worried about the Latino vote and would just close the border tight and boot all illegals.

                                                          • 7 votes
                                                          Reply#23 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:33 AM EDT

                                                          You should also mention that the dems want them, the mexicans, rolling in here by the wagonload...why? Because the more of them that can vote illegally the better the chances that this administration will not be ousted! Of all the outrageous arguments; voters are being disenfranchised if they are asked to provide picture ID in order to vote. Really?? We need a picture ID in this country for just about everything we do; including getting a job or collecting welfare and foodstamps. If you are an American adult you most likely have picture ID. I don't have a problem producing my picture ID in order to prove that I am entitled to vote. One might wonder why minorities are having a problem doing the same.

                                                          Hmmmmmmmmm

                                                          • 5 votes
                                                          #23.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:03 AM EDT
                                                          Reply

                                                          ah, Mexico, the Perfect place to take a dip, get a tan and possibly end up beheaded, shot or wounded on da way home.

                                                          • 5 votes
                                                          Reply#24 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:39 AM EDT

                                                          I cannot believe how many are "predicting it will be here soon" because it already is and has been for several years. I live on the Ohio river which is about as central as one can get in the U.S. We recently buried a nine year old girl who was shot to death as she slept in her own bed when a stray bullet went through her bedroom wall. It came from a drug related shooting in the alley behind her house. I had occasion to spend a lot of time near Oklahoma City and was shocked to find that the cartels were recruiting the motorcycle gangs in North OKC as runners and distributors of cocaine and heroin from Mexico. When I was stationed in California in the 1970s you could buy various drugs from 9th grade middle school students and young girls were routinely into prostitution because they were hooked on coke and other drugs.

                                                          Wake up people and get a clue. The drug problems are already here. We have public officials now who are being arrested and convicted for being corrupted by the drug cartels. That is precisely how they have gained so much control in Mexico and some South American countries. This is really old news because that is exactly how the Mafia gained so much power and control during prohibition in the 1930s. DeJaVu. The taboos used to be alcohol, gambling, drugs, and prostitution. Well we finally gave up on alcohol and gambling and all that is left is drugs and prostitution. Once we figure out how to deal with those last two things should calm down considerably economically as well as criminally. Violence would also go away to a large extent.

                                                          However as long as the old hard line conservative moral majority Evangelical Bible thumpers have their way THEY will continue to profit from our sins and vices as THEY have all along and we will continue to pay with innocent young blood and wasted tax dollars.

                                                          You see it is THEY who own and operate the for profit prison systems. It is THEY who run the pharmaceutical companies that supply the Rx versions of our favorite party drugs. It is THEY who sell all of the junk used to fight the so called drug war as well as all of the paraphernalia used in our so called war on terror like the cancer causing scanners and so on. For THEM all of these "WARS" are nothing more than good business opportunities with huge profits to be made. Every war that we declare is just creating a new market opportunity for the blood suckers out there. Think about it. Take away the wars and the profits all go away for the cartels but also for the vampires within our own society. Interesting isn't it? LOL

                                                          • 12 votes
                                                          Reply#25 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:44 AM EDT

                                                          The two guys they suspect; only have to make it to the United States and then they will be safe. Protected by President Obama and Eric Holder. Bring our troops home now and station them on the border for the real war we are fighting.

                                                          • 8 votes
                                                          #25.1 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:57 AM EDT

                                                          That's one of the stupidest comments I've seen!

                                                          • 3 votes
                                                          #25.2 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:54 AM EDT

                                                          shepherd0886

                                                          Glad to see someone on here that can see the way things really are

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #25.3 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:09 AM EDT

                                                          Exactly, Shepherdo. The "War on Drugs" is really a "War for Profits", and is one of the biggest scams ever perpetrated using our tax dollars.

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #25.4 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:21 AM EDT

                                                          Kevin, it's not stupid. We are fighting an influx of drugs coming over the Mexican border. There is no denying this. How would it impact we as Americans, for the worse, if we had military patrolling and controlling our borders? Different times call for different measures.

                                                          • 5 votes
                                                          #25.5 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:28 AM EDT

                                                          Wouldn't matter. The cartels would buy the military if they don't own it already. You want to end drug abuse and drug traficking in the US? Put into function a law that makes the death sentence automatic and quick, like the next day, for anyone involved or suspected of being involved in that business. That will stop all this sh**.

                                                          • 2 votes
                                                          #25.6 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:55 AM EDT

                                                          shepherdo886 - Please explain your reasoning of how the hardlining "conservative moral majority Evangelical Bible thumpers" own what appears to be everything, according to your post. Are you referring to the conservatives? Or the Bible thumpers? See, you're tossing these names at people without clarifying your subject. Are you angry at conservatives, or at Bible thumpers? What about Evangelicals? They're all separate notations, and you're trying to pass them all off as one - sorry, but that's not correct.

                                                          Furthermore, how are Bible thumpers profiting? I know some conservative Christians I'd say are Bible thumpers, and they aren't making much profit at all - in fact, most of them are relatively poor.

                                                          And I love how you choose one side as the instigator of all these problems. Don't you realize that politicians on both Dem and Repub sides are to blame? You really need to stop believing everything you read and start thinking critically about both sides of the issue.

                                                            #25.7 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:04 PM EDT

                                                            Just think..that little girl that got killed in her bed would still be alive if we legalized drugs, addicts would no longer have to buy on the street corner, they could walk into a 7-11 and buy it without any violence !!

                                                            Hmmmm, I wonder when the older generation will finally realize that this war on drugs did not work, will never work because we know prohibition did not work...

                                                            did we not learn anything from the prohibition on booze 70 years ago ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

                                                            • 3 votes
                                                            #25.8 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:31 PM EDT

                                                            However as long as the old hard line conservative moral majority Evangelical Bible thumpers have their way THEY will continue to profit from our sins and vices as THEY have all along and we will continue to pay with innocent young blood and wasted tax dollars.

                                                            Couldn't have said it better myself. Good post Shepherd.

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #25.9 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:14 PM EDT

                                                            To Shelley2080140 that was indeed a broad brush that I wielded but it was used in the interest of brevity. I didn't have the time or the space here to point out specific instances of individuals from such groups as to their particular participation in such corruption. The point is that all of them have some measure of culpability as do both political parties. My biggest complaint at the present is that for those who say "vote them out of office" I have to say what are our choices? We presently have only a selection of the lesser of two evils depending upon our own individual perspective. Frankly I am not pleased with our whole political system as it exists today. It is totally corrupt and rife with bribery and cronism.

                                                            As Nikita Kruschev predicted back in the 1960s America would collapse from within and so it is. Our nation's future greatness depended upon our ability to achieve balance (yin/yang if you will) in both the liberal and conservative views so that the end result best served all parties in our population. We have lost that ability. It is now down to a 'my way or the highway' mentality and we are self destructing because of it. Every extremist out there is part of the problem you see. The ones I listed in a group are just a few of the culprits. Balance and compromise or collapse in disarray that is the lesson here.

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #25.10 - Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:52 PM EDT
                                                            Reply

                                                            What is current rate, in pesos and dollars, for the return of a kidnap victim: (a) alive; (b) not alive; (c) not at all?

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            Reply#26 - Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:48 AM EDT
                                                            Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 12
                                                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.