
Jim Seida / NBC News
Syrians gather in London's Trafalgar Square on Thursday to protest the Assad regime.
LONDON -- As the Olympic torch made its way into London's famous Trafalgar Square, Ammar Masarani stood wrapped in the flag of the Syrian uprising against the murderous regime of President Bashar Assad among a crowd of about 50 other dissidents.
They had waited for almost two hours this moment to highlight the slaughter of more than 10,000 of their countrymen. As the torch went by, they waved their flags, but remained largely silent in order, Masarani said, "to stay within the rules."
"Most people don't know what's going on in Syria with the Assad regime, so we are out here to raise awareness," Masarani told NBCNews.com. "I'm from Homs, he [Assad] has destroyed most of my city. He's destroyed most of the cities, Homs, Daraa, Hama. He destroyed them and now he's starting in Damascus and Aleppo."
The Olympic torch is set to makes its grand entrance at tonight's opening ceremony celebration after a 70-day journey and racking up about 8,000 miles throughout its tour. NBC's Michelle Kosinski reports.
Given the scale of the problems in Syria, Thursday night's flag-waving demonstration might be a small gesture. However, it is the kind of protest that the Olympic organizers seek to avoid, insisting firmly that sports and politics should not mix and that the high ideals of "Olympism" must not be sullied by partisan campaigns.
More coverage of the Syria conflict
But experts who spoke to NBCNews.com accused the International Olympic Committee of picking and choosing what to regard as political while spinning the "fairy tale" of neutrality, suggesting it was time for the movement to acknowledge reality.
The present IOC's badly handled refusal of the request for a minute's silence for the victims of the Munich massacre at Friday's Opening Ceremony is perhaps case in point. Since the 1972 Games, the Olympics has done little to formally commemorate the dead, and relatives and Israeli officials had hoped the 40th anniversary would provide an appropriate opportunity.
Instead, IOC President Jacques Rogge and several leading figures in the U.K. held a minute's silence in the Olympic Village on Monday at short notice and without publicizing what they were doing -- after what Rogge described as a "spontaneous suggestion" -- but that only seemed to add insult to injury.
Daniel Taub, Israel’s ambassador to the U.K., told NBCNews.com that the Munich massacre was "beyond politics." The Embassy was holding its own minute's silence Friday, after a last-ditch plea to Rogge by the widows of two of the hostages fell on deaf ears.
"We’re talking about the darkest moment of Olympic history," Taub said.

Toby Melville / Reuters
Sebastian Coe (left), chairman of the London Olympic organising committee, and other officials mark a minute's silence at a ceremony in the Olympic Park in East London on Monday. President of the International Olympic Commission, Jacques Rogge paid tribute to the 11 Israeli team members who were killed at the 1972 Munich Games at a ceremony at the Athletes Village in London on Monday.
“An attack on the Olympic ideals of peace and harmony through friendship and solidarity really requires remembering publicly within the Olympic framework. I would say that’s not politics, it’s humanity. The fear is that a failure to do that becomes political," he said.
“I would say in a very real way the people calling for a remembrance are really standing up for the true ideals of the Olympic Games, not trying to betray them," he added.
Taub said Israelis were puzzled that “something that seems to be such a clear violation of Olympic ideals doesn’t seem to be deserving of commemoration.”
Ilana Romano, widow of Yossef Romano, an Olympic boxer killed in 1972, returned to Israel Thursday from England where she made a personal plea to the IOC to relent. She told NBCNews.com that she hoped spectators would stay silent and the media would turn off their microphones for a minute while Rogge speaks at the Opening Ceremony.
'Pandora's Box'
Jules Boykoff, a former U.S. soccer player and an associate professor in Pacific University’s department of politics and government, said the IOC should recognize they are involved in politics and consider setting up a committee or some other formal way of dealing with such issues.
Boykoff, who is in London researching a book about the Games, said this would open "a kind of Pandora’s Box in terms of the issues they might have to deal with,” but scorned the claim that the Olympics is apolitical.
“The idea that sports and politics don’t mix is a fairy tale that the IOC tells itself to help it sleep better," he said. “It’s obviously thrumming with politics at every level.”
He said an Olympic political commitee might get decisions wrong, but at least people would know “here’s where we [the IOC] are coming from."
More London 2012 coverage from NBCNews.com
There are suggestions that at least some political issues are decided in secret, for example when planning where to put different nations -- perhaps arch-rivals such as Israel and Iran -- in the Olympic Village. (On Monday, Iran announced that its athletes would compete against Israelis in London. The country faced criticism after some competitors withdrew from events against Israelis at the 2004 Athens Games and 2008 Beijing Games.)
"Politics is taken into account when choosing who goes where, but that's based on guidance at International Olympic Committee level, not by [organizers of] London 2012, and it's agreed by each country in advance -- they know who their neighbors are going to be," a senior official involved in operations told NBCNews.com.
"It's about making sure athletes are comfortable in their living space rather than which countries don't get on," the source said. "Even then, it's a not really an issue. You've got to remember that these guys compete alongside each other all the time and all over the world --they know each other, some of them are best man at the other's wedding and so on."
However, London 2012 organizers LOCOG denied international diplomacy played any role in the allocation of areas in the athletes' village, saying in an emailed statement "political issues are not a factor."
From the "Sting-Ray" and the "Pringle" to the massive Olympic stadium that's described as an island, TODAY's Savannah Guthrie takes a look at the venues where more than 9 million spectators will catch a glimpse at the Games.
The Olympic movement does sometimes make open forays outside the world of sport. The Olympic truce, for example, calls for fighting around the world to stop for the duration of the Games.
But, in case anyone was thinking this might offer hope for countries like Syria, Boykoff was scathing. This "really nice idea" was "sort of a farce," he said. "Battles are going to continue across the world, they are not going to stop for the games, as popular as it is."
Flag flaps
Apart from the flag of the Syrian opposition, other flags have been already been causing political controversy at London 2012.
The Games actually began Wednesday with several soccer matches, one involving the North Korean and Colombian women's teams.
North Korea came out to train in Glasgow's Hampden Park stadium, but then walked off the field and refused to return after the South Korean flag was mistakenly used by officials. The game eventually did take place about an hour later with the North Koreans winning 2-0.
On Friday, it emerged that Taiwan's flag had been removed from among a host of others on London's Regent Street over concerns that China would be offended. Taiwan, which China views as a breakaway province, uses the flag of the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee at the Games, after the IOC ruled it could not use its own flag in the early 1980s.
Fortress London: UK protects Olympics with biggest security plan since WWII
And a marathon runner from new nation South Sudan, Guor Marial, will compete under the Olympic flag, after he understandably turned down the chance to run for Sudan -- which fought a decades-long civil war with the South that ended in the latter's independence. He was unable to run for his own country because it has not yet become a member of the Olympic movement.
But apart from Marial, everyone else will be competing for their country and Alan Bairner, professor of sport and social theory at the U.K.'s Loughborough University and author of a book, "The Politics of the Olympics," said the Opening Ceremony would be "replete with the politics of nationalism."
This runs contrary to the initial desire of the founder of the modern Olympics, Pierre de Coubertin, for athletes to compete as individuals rather than in state teams to avoid overly nationalistic sentiment.
A comment made by GOP candidate Mitt Romney during a Wednesday interview with NBC's Brian Williams led to some tension with UK Prime Minister David Cameron and the Mayor of London as well. NBC's Peter Alexander reports.
“They talk about the world coming together, but the world comes together with national flags and anthems," Bairner said. "Events at Hampden Park … clearly demonstrated the significance of flags and emblems at supposedly apolitical events – particularly if the organizers don’t get it right."
Bairner said only flags of competing nations were allowed to be flown at Olympic events and questioned what would happen if the flag of Scotland – part of the United Kingdom – was flown or given to a successful Scottish athlete as they celebrate.
Scotland has also been racked with concern over the entry of a Team Great Britain in the soccer event. Despite being one country, the U.K. has four international soccer teams -- England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland -- and other countries have questioned whether this is fair. The fear in Scotland particularly was that a Team GB would set a precedent that would lead to the demise of the Scottish national team.
Bairner, a Scot, said the idea was almost unthinkable. "I can't imagine life without Scottish teams in these competitions [the World Cup, European Championships etc]," he said. "For it just to become Team GB, I would lose interest and support Spain or Germany."
He suggested the loss of the Scottish soccer team would provide a "boost" for supporters of independence from the U.K. ahead of a referendum on the issue in 2014.
Millionaire medalists: Will London 2012 remain true to Olympic spirit?
Bairner said the IOC tended to pick and choose what they deemed to be political.
It was possible, he said, that the IOC thought a Munich commemoration at the Opening Ceremony would be viewed as “pro-Israel.”
But he suggested it was “just about remembering people who died at an Olympic Games,” and said he thought most people would be "comfortable" with the idea.
Bairner, who said his sympathies tended to be with the Palestinians, said it was difficult to see how anyone could “object too strongly because they would almost be condoning that kind of activity,” and suggest that Olympic athletes were “legitimate targets.”
British weather could impact Olympic records
The ad hoc approach to political issues has been going on for years.
A few months before the Beijing Games of 2008, Rogge declared firmly that it was a "sporting, not a political, association," as he dismissed the effect of the resignation of filmmaker Steven Spielberg as artistic consultant over China's support for Sudan amid the Darfur conflict.
And in 1936, Avery Brundage, then head of the American Olympic movement and later an IOC president, opposed a boycott of that year's Berlin Games in Nazi Germany for the same reason.
The IOC’s decision to go ahead with the 1936 Munich Games -- awarded before the Nazis came to power partly to help shore up Germany's ailing democracy -- had handed Adolf Hitler a "huge propaganda victory,” Bairner said.
“You compare that with 1968 when [athletes] Tommie Smith and John Carlos do the Black Power salute. They are punished by the IOC for bringing politics into sport," he said, in perhaps an indication of what might happen to any Syria athletes trying to draw attention to the ongoing bloodshed in their country.

AFP - Getty Images, file
U.S. athletes Tommie Smith (center) and John Carlos (right) raise their gloved fists in the Black Power salute after receiving their Olympic medals on Oct. 17, 1968.
The treatment of Smith and Carlos likely gives an indication of what might happen to any Syrian athletes who attempt to use the Games to protest the killings in their country.
“It seems they [the IOC] decide what is political at any given time … what they approve of and don't approve of. That’s when they become quite a slippery organization," Bairner said.
NBCNews.com submitted requests for comment from the IOC about the issues raised in this article on Wednesday and Thursday.
Media relations manager Sandrine Tonge said a response would be provided "as soon as we can."
More world stories from NBC News:
- Millionaire medalists: Does the Olympic spirit live on?
- In Japan, a nuclear ghost town stirs to life
- Researchers: 'Grand Canyon' under Antarctica tied to ice loss
- Wife of ousted China politician charged with murder
- Romney compliments Olympic preparation after tizzy in British press
- Rebels fear Syria's 'ghost fighters,' the regime's hidden militia
- Stowaway schoolboy: 'It was easier than my homework'
- Olympics security plan turns London into fortress
- Sea Shepherd founder skips bail in Germany
- UK cops: Fraudster tries to sell missing oil executive's $1M home
Follow World News on NBCNews.com on Twitter and



Like it or not, the IOC is running the show. If you don't like it, don't send your athletes.
Nothing involved with politics is "neutral", including the Olympics.
The more they can do to keep politics out of the Olympics the better. No international competition can remain completely apolitical in this day and age, but the more they try and keep political considerations out of the games the better it will be. The Olympic committee does need to come up with some hard and fast definition of what it considers a country so that issues like Taiwan vs China and Scotland vs. Great Britain do not continue to be an issue.
Once again, the Mitt has really hit the fan. And, that's quite a talent for Mittens to ruffle feathers on a rather easy goodwill mission such as this. I wonder how he will go over in Poland and Israel? Stay tuned for more cringe-worthy Loony tunes.
I have to agree with statement. Even before 1936 you had the Jim Thorpe tragedy with the IOC basically lying about the rules in 1912.
The games stopped being neutral in 1936 and with advances in telecomminications they can never be neutral.
To put it politely, Jacque Rogge is nothing more than a Jew-hating coward who will continue to kowtow to certain countries and not remember the Munich Massacre.
Just a small correction to what I read in the article, 1936 Games were in Berlin not Munich. Munich Olimpics were in 1972, the games of "Hope and Horror" as they became know for obvious reason. I was also surprised that no one brough up 1980 and 1984 Games which were boycoted by US and USSR respectivly.
To the authors...the 1936 Olympics were in Berlin, not Munich.
The Olympic Games are about the money. How can you have professionals on the field and spend over $17 Billion to put on the show and it not be about the money?
The Olympic committees are made up of people and thus are not likely to be neutral. That is why panels of diverse judges are used. US politics demonstrates the same problems. That is why technical reviews of measurable data are useful in making more objective decisions.
The 1936 Olympic stadiums in Berlin were very well built, maintained, and used by the public when we were there in 1965.
It's never been neutral and never will be.
Banning all foreign politicians from attending might help. LOL
The press would have very little to chew over.
Demonstrations in the street are just as political, however. What to do? What to do?
YES! It is a fairy tale. One only has to look back at all the countries who have tried to make it a political statement, oh wait, that is EVERY year since the beginning.
Get real, it is the perfect form to make a statement, like or not, that is what this who thing is really about.
Yes! It is a fairy tale. Has been from the beginning because it is the perfect form for making a statement.
Anybody who think other wise in LIVING in a fairy tale.
Bottom line, nothing but a party. The mega-rich are getting richer off taxpayers, and those poor fools who travel to these events on the "BANKS" credit card, after all, you're paying it back to the "mega-rich BANKS" in interest.
And then, there's the fact of these Olympic villages/arenas mostly going to hell after the games. the mega-rich move on to their next Ponzi scheme, while you, the taxpayers are left to either maintain some of these useless arenas, or you, the taxpayers, pay to have them torn down.
Nice game the mega-rich play......LOL
Wow, and here I was thinking, "You know, this article is really more realistic and reasoned than cynical. What could they add to really drag this event down and stomp all over its meaning for no reason other than aimless spite?"
And then you came along. Thanks Mosh, it was a pleasure. God forbid ANY news thread should be spared meaningless whining about the rich exploiting people.
No sweat
usually people like you can't handle the truth in your profession, that's why so much of it is twisted.
Are you Romney's accontant?
Olympic officials rank high on the list of the world's sleaziest politicians.
No doubt.
Based on the article in UK's Daily Mail, there doesn't seem to be too much negative tension between the athletes. Olympic officials distributed 150,000 condoms to the athletes (50,000 more than they handed out at Beijing) and have a back-up supply if they run out. Do we really want our children to look up to these athletes who are having random sex with strangers? You can read the article for yourselves and see how casually and openly they're having sex at Olympic Village. NOT the kind of "heroes" I think our children should have. I'm embarrassed to think this is the moral character of the people representing our country.
If that's really the worst kind of person your kids could look up to, you have some amazingly wholesome kids. Extremely accomplished, patriotic, hard-working, world-class athletes who apparently even practice safe sex? I hate to burst your puritan bubble, but people don't really get much better than that.
When the Olympic games were revived it seemed a grand idea. But they implemented it wrong and brought politics with them. It has gotten worse with each game. And once the admitted professionals it has been all about the money since. Sadly a wonderful ideal in ancient times has become a farce.
Well, ploitics and money really need to be involved, since it is involved in all aspects of the modern world. I really is a good thing.
It probably wouldn't be possible otherwise, that's for sure.
if there's no politics, than : no politics. the unfortunate event from 1972 was very political, invoking it would be a political thing = sorry, it's a no no. let the games begin. go usa!
The very idea that the Olympic Games have ever been apolitical is just a bunch of phoney baloney. They always have been about politics and, most of all, money.
all but economy in london? america? AUSTERITY. WAKEUPANDSTEPUP. america/uk middle?
why are the women 'performers' almost naked?
Ratings?
Says the woman with a "Superman" logo emblazoned over the penis on a pair of boxers as her logo.
So men will watch, why else.
1st: Ladies' choice.
2nd: Minimize wind and other resistance.
3rd: Impress the judges.
4th: The term athelete is more accurate than performer.
The olympics are a corporate love fest anymore. It's all a shame. Do away with it all. It sucks.
Money, pro contestants, off-the-wall "sports," politics . . .
Gave up on the olympics years ago.
Another lefty fantasy! Reality , rules. Cameron is a pocket gopher for Obama and that is why he tries to embarrass Mitt. He is just another Marxist lefty, who has some secret agreements with Obama, STAY OUT OF USA POLITICS! Go and attack Argentina, if you have the balls.
o please this would not be an issue but it is jews that are making it an issue. sports are not politics. sports are arenas where people take a break from politics and enjoy sports. if they want to make it about politics bring the politicians to compete
Jacques Rogge is a spineless coward, and theIOC should be ashamed of itself for not doing the decent thing: open the Olypicss with one minute of silence to honor the 11 Israelis murdered by terrorists in the 1972 Olympics. Shame on them.
The Olympics have always been politicized in the past several decades. Remember when Jimmy Carter stopped the U.S. Olympic team from competing in the 1980 Moscow Olympics because Russia had invaded Afghanistan. I guess president Carter never realized that those were not the "Moscow Olympics," but rather the International Olympic Games being held in Moscow.
Just think of the people in London that were put to work to build the venue.
Is that political???