Medical team heads to Antarctica to rescue US expeditioner

Updated at 8:30 a.m. ET: A medical team was heading to Antarctica on Wednesday in a bid to rescue an ailing American expeditioner.

The Australian team of five landed in Christchurch, New Zealand, on Wednesday night. Team members were monitoring the weather in Antarctica before flying on to McMurdo Station in their Australian Airbus319 aircraft by the end of the week, conditions permitting, officials with the Australian Antarctic Division (AAD) and the U.S. National Science Foundation told NBC News.


The Australian Antarctic Division is a branch of the government's environment department.

Debbie Wing of the National Science Foundation told NBC News that a a U.S. C-17 aircraft was on standby in case the Airbus could not manage the trip.

From the archives: Why Antarctic rescues are so dangerous

The National Science Foundation had asked for help on the emergency mission and were in charge of the operation, AAD spokeswoman Patti Lucas Lucas told NBC News. Australian officials did not have any details as to the expeditioner's age or sex, she added.

McMurdo Station, established in 1955, is the largest Antarctic station, according to the National Science Foundation.


According to the U.S. Antarctic Program's website:

"McMurdo Station ... the main U.S. station in Antarctica, is a coastal station at the southern tip of Ross Island, about 3,864 km (2,415 miles) south of Christchurch, New Zealand, and 1,360 km (850 miles) north of the South Pole. The original station was built in 1955 to 1956 for the International Geophysical Year. Today's station is the primary logistics facility for supply of inland stations and remote field camps, and is also the waste management center for much of the U.S. Antarctic Program. Year-round and summer science projects are supported at McMurdo."

AAD director Tony Fleming earlier told the AFP news service that all countries with an interest in Antarctica "work together very cooperatively in these sorts of emergency situations in Antarctica to provide support when and as required."

Vast Antarctic ice sheet 'in play' with global warming

A 58-year-old New Hampshire woman who's been working at the South Pole on Monday flew out of the research station she'd been living in for a year. Renee-Nicole Douceur fell ill at the end of August and asked to be airlifted out. NBC's Anne Thompson reports.

Similar evacuations from the icy continent rare, with the last such rescue having happened in October 2011, when an American scientist suffered a stroke at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station and had to be airlifted out

Around 30 countries operate permanent research stations in Antarctica, the AFP reported. 

More world stories from NBC News:

Discuss this post

Cue the whining finger pointers who will blame the patient for their condition, and then proceed to whinge about the cost of the evacuation as though the money for it came out of their personal bank account. 5...4...3....2....

  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 8:33 AM EDT
Comment author avatarmike277Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

This is Romney's fault.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 8:39 AM EDT

mike277 - Why bother to post when you have nothing to say about the article? Why waste everyone's time reading your nonsense? Vote for who you prefer and so will the rest of us. Otherwise, keep your political opinions to yourself, PLEASE!

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 8:55 AM EDT

People should have a physical before they go to those isolated places. Also, is it really a good idea for someone that has suffered a stroke to go back? I wish people would use common sense, to avoid having to spend time and resources later in "rescuing" them.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 9:02 AM EDT

This is the second time in 2 years that we've had to do this. QUIT SENDING OLD PEOPLE TO THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE! If you can't get them out quickly, then they do not need to be there.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 10:37 AM EDT

IRESPOND--re-read the article. There's no mention of the condition of the individual nor who they are. The stroke victim was another incident.

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 11:10 AM EDT

Is it time to construct a fully equipped state-of-the-art hospital there? Wouldn't have to be that big.

  • 2 votes
#1.6 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 12:18 PM EDT

trust2122 & Irespond - Don't know the age of the sick scientist. However, maybe kids aren't quite educated enough to handle what the scientists are investigating. This isn't the movies where 20 something year olds have all the answers! This is real life where experience counts.

Perhaps you two need to exercise some common sense!

  • 1 vote
#1.7 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 1:12 PM EDT

Allpeoplerights...............Agreed! In 2010 50% of the work force in America was comprised of those OVER 50 and it is predicted that by 2018 that number will be 80%. High school graduates today do not have, or have not learned basic stills to calculate simple problems or write proficiently any better than of a 3rd grader !

    #1.8 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 1:57 PM EDT

    Another1,

    "Is it time to construct a fully equipped state-of-the-art hospital there? Wouldn't have to be that big."

    That's really not a bad idea, except it would be kind of hard to construct anything there now. Antarctica is in the middle of winter now right now. It's usually pretty nasty weather there any time of year, but it's especially nasty in the winter. I think that's the reason why this rescue operation is going to be kind of tricky.

      #1.9 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 2:22 PM EDT
      Reply

      Hope they are able to get the person out who is sick. Dangerous operation. I hope the rescuers are safe in their attempt to rescue.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#2 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 8:57 AM EDT

      Uh...hello - Are you absolutely certain your Momma didn't raise a fool? The money to pay for these "expeditions" and the inevitable rescues come from TAX MONEY! That DOES come out of my bank account. These "scientists" know what they're getting into when they sign on for these outings. Then when things take a bad turn its up to the taxpayers to foot the bill for their rescue. In my opinion, it might not be a bad idea to start a graveyard right down there. How many people can say their daddy (or mommy) is buried at the South Pole? I would think that would be a privilege for a scientist with such a passion for the bottom of the world!

      • 2 votes
      Reply#3 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 8:58 AM EDT

      Ken -

      Yes, good idea, let's just let scientists die there rather than bring them back for medical care. Let's do that for you too! When you get sick, your family should just drop you in an isolated place and let you die. I am sure they will be "proud and privileged" that you died "somewhere". It will save them a lot of money to not have to take care of you.

      You are a jerk of the highest order to say such a thing!

      • 2 votes
      #3.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 9:03 AM EDT

      Ken in CT... I can't even fathom how you can even try to use that arguement. First, there is no indication that this research is funded by US tax dollars. Second, if it is, there may be a good reason for it. Third, if these scientists were to discover a cure for a disease that you may get in the future, I am sure you would be using that cure (even though it was a waste of "your" tax dollars.

      Go find a hole to crawl in.

      • 2 votes
      #3.2 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 9:19 AM EDT
      Reply

      And by the way - I don't blame the patient for their condition, just their situation. After all, it was their decision to go to a place where medical help is a LONG way off!

        Reply#4 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 9:04 AM EDT

        Idiot! They are scientists - they are not on vacation!

        • 1 vote
        #4.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 1:08 PM EDT
        Reply

        What are you talking about - nobody dropped ANYBODY involuntarily AFTER they got sick - they made the choice knowing there are risks. Its about taking responsibility for your choices! And when the time comes that I get sick, I won't be a burden to my family OR the taxpayers!

        • 2 votes
        Reply#5 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 9:07 AM EDT

        I just love arrogant fools who think they have a "handle" on everything in life. You are an idiot to think you are so independent and perfect. Also, perhaps this person's expertise was important to their goals. You are just jealous that you are not all that important! Grow up and have compassion for people. Maybe, if you are lucky, someone will have compassion for you when you need it.

        • 2 votes
        #5.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 9:11 AM EDT

        Ken you speak like someone who likely has never gotten seriously sick or injured and been in a position where you need help from others. It is a humbling experience that would change your point of view very quickly I assure you. I would like to think your comments are nothing more than a spoiled brat trying to annoy other people in a bid for attention, I guess the thought of you really being this way is too disappointing to believe. Your comments are absurd and lack any sense of compassion or common sense for that matter. There is no indication what happened to this person, maybe a box fell off a shelf and hit them in the head, which would be through no fault of their own. They were out "working", just doing their job. The fact that you see no value in it because they are a scientist is because smart people obviously threaten you. I'm betting it is considerably more difficult to train, prepare and work in that environment than anything you do in cushy CT. I wonder if you would feel any different if they said it was a military scientist. Surely if they were researching ways to kill people you might find more value in it. As a last point, using your ridiculous logic that the person knew they were going to be working somewhere that medical care was not easily available and therefore no effort should be made to rescue them, I find it hard to see how you can draw a distinction between someone in a car crash that needs to be rescued. Surely they knew the risk of driving an automobile and that a crash was possible. Why should we spend tax dollars to send rescue workers out to save them?

        • 3 votes
        #5.2 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 9:55 AM EDT

        As somebody who spent six months out of the year for four years going to McMurdo Station in the late 80's and early 90's let me point some things out to all the "experts" who have never been down there. First of all, I was with the Medical Department of the Naval Support Force Antarctica. This was a Navy command on permanent loan to the National Science Foundation before the Navy's participation ended and it went to civilian contract. At that time, as well as currently, all prospective candidates were extensively screened medically. If they were winter-over candidates, they also underwent psychological evaluations. What many people do not seem to comprehend is that a person can be or seem perfectly healthy and have nothing show on the mandatory lab work before going to the Ice. People can and do get sick while down there and do require emergency medical treatment and emergency medical evacuation off the Ice.

        The misconception presented by this article is in what it does not say. At this time of year, the advance party flights down to Antarctica have or are already staging into the forward support base at Christchurch, New Zealand for a evolution known as WIN-FLY or Winter Fly In. These are advance parties that go down two months before the beginning of the regular Austral summer season, which begins at the beginning of October, to help the outgoing winter over personnel turn over to the oncoming summer support personnel. Flights to Antarctica were most likely already in the works when the current medical emergency occurred. The permanent snow covered runways at Williams Field out side of McMurdo Station have already been prepared to receive ski equipped C-130 aircraft, as well as the temporary Ice Runway carved out out of the ice to receive C-17 and C-5 transport aircraft delivering supplies and equipment, and to take out any personnel leaving Antarctica.

        • 7 votes
        #5.3 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 12:26 PM EDT
        Reply

        It took a whole 25 minutes for Kenny the Invincible to show his ugly face here. He must have been sleeping. If Ken were my neighbor, and suffered a heart attack on his front lawn, I would think it only right and just that nobody dial 911. Karma can be a real b|tch!

        • 2 votes
        Reply#6 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 9:33 AM EDT

        I chose to ignore him. It is simpler

          #6.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 11:42 AM EDT

          Simpler to ignore Ken, but kind of fun to respond to him.

            #6.2 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 1:17 PM EDT
            Reply

            All people who apply to go to Antarctica undergo both physical and psychological evaluations before being allowed to go. Quite a few years ago, a doctor down at the South Pole station had to do a needle biopsy on her own breast, and discovered a very aggressive form of breast cancer. A C-130 from the NY National Guard flew to the South Pole in the most adverse conditions to extract her. The crew was at the pole for a grand total of 20 minutes, with temperatures well below -80. Planes (and machinery in general) do not do well in these conditions. The VOLUNTEER crew was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for their actions.

            The point I am making is that no matter how much screening is done, the unexpected will occur.

            For further information regarding what we do in Antarctica, do a google search on the 'Antarctic Sun.'

            • 6 votes
            Reply#7 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 10:05 AM EDT

            Very good post, Thanks

            • 1 vote
            #7.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 11:41 AM EDT

            PilotHawkeye, well stated. As you well know, there is a horrendous difference in the weather conditions between this time of year and the middle of the winter. That New York Air Guard crew certainly earned those awards. Always nice to hear from a fellow OAE.

            • 1 vote
            #7.2 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 12:43 PM EDT
            Reply

            Hopefully the medical evacuation will be successful. Now, let's all consider what would happen if this were to occur on a Mars Mission...

              Reply#8 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 10:41 AM EDT

              because time and unforeseen occurrence befell them all. Ecclesiastes 9:11. There's no guarantees in this life, but

              good things are coming. I too, ignore those who try to rain on me, or ridicule the Good News when they don't

              know what they are talking about.

                Reply#9 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 12:01 PM EDT

                Enjoy your Good News. It has nothing to do with the article. Go drink your beer and read your bible.

                • 1 vote
                #9.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 1:05 PM EDT
                Reply

                I want to thank you all for waking me up! I had completely forgotten about all the breakthroughs in medicine and technology that have come out of Antarctica! You know…all I did was say that I don’t think its fair that taxpayers have to foot the bill (and they ALWAYS do) when someone makes a choice to go into a dangerous situation (whether its climbing Mt Hood or a trek to the South Pole), then someone else has to go into harm’s way to get them out. Do you think that aviation fuel is free…or that the Australian government isn’t going to send us a bill for that? But I never wished any ill will on anyone here OR them down there. I just said that people need to start accepting the consequences of their own choices. But I like your idea – “See it my way or DIE!” You folks have a nice day.

                  Reply#10 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 12:51 PM EDT

                  Ken - Your little points will mean something when you accomplish even half what these scientists accomplish for the rest of the world. Until then, keep your childish ideas to yourself. Grow up!

                  • 1 vote
                  #10.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 1:03 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Remember that is the Southern Hemisphere, where July & August is the middle of WINTER. It is regretful to hear, but the scientists who camp out in -100 F know it is a risky situation.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#11 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 2:00 PM EDT

                  yeah im sure she is sick. sick of being at the south pole that is.

                    Reply#12 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 2:40 PM EDT

                    Compare the ultimate lack of any coverage of this hush-hush drama with full coverage of the 2001 rescue and it speaks volumes about the increase in censorship and restiction of availability of simple public information on the increasingly information restricted web. Compare with OKIE, S (April 14, 2001) "Planes May Try To Rescue Doctor From Antarctica" http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2001-04-14/news/0104130978_1_ronald-shemenski-doctor-s-medical-condition-medical-rescue-effort

                      Reply#13 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 2:48 PM EDT

                      OH! And AllPeopleRights...I'm SO flattered that you've kept up with my accomplishments!

                        Reply#14 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 3:37 PM EDT

                        there are always contingency plans for emergencies in hostile environments like the poles - the pilots don't just jump in a plan saying, "damn the weather! full speed ahead!" - the people wintering over know what they are up against and i am sure that more than one spent a winter down there with an unforsceen illness and barely left alive - there is valuable research at the poles that cannot be done anywhere else and, yes, it is done with tax dollars but with such a puny amount it wouldn't make a dent in the budget congress has for itself for doing nothing

                        as for taxes - it is amazing how everything in these columns comes back to "my tax dollars" - my tax dollars gave me roads (forget that - a horse and buggy don't need roads) - my tax dollars give me police and fire protection - (forget that - give me a ak47 and a hose) - my tax dollars gives me a military to protect me - (forget that and give me my ak47 again) - my tax dollars give my mother of 85 a little money to live on and some health care - (forget that - she can get i job with benefits) - i don't like taxes anymore than the next guy but there are here to stay and need to stay unless you wingnuts really want to live like somalia - no taxes there - no government - no police - just warlords and guns and walking dead

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#15 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 4:11 PM EDT

                        My money goes on the following: An aging woman "having it all" gets knocked up and is preggo.

                        Cue the Men. - yes, remember the able-bodied ones that basically discovered the entire globe without one woman's pregnancy getting in the way ?

                        yup -those guys.

                          Reply#16 - Wed Aug 8, 2012 6:02 PM EDT

                          why do women keep going down there that are in bad medical shape? they cost millions to get them home, they should ban women from the artic, they are nothing but trouble, always getting sick, needing something,

                            Reply#17 - Thu Aug 9, 2012 2:21 PM EDT

                            Zippy, once again as somebody who spent considerable time in Antarctica in the medical field, I can tell you that from studies done, the women there were actually, in most cases healthier than the men and missed a lot fewer days off work due to injury or illness! Your ridiculous statement is about as clueless as you are!

                              Reply#18 - Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:49 AM EDT
                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.