There's always someone out there willing to sell out, even if it means the lives of thousands. Lock these 4 away for life.

4 GERMANS........ I'm not going to say THAT but.

slam these A55HOLES into prison.

Now, now boys, if memory serve me right, and it does, Saddam wanted to build a Super Gun. There was a man in Canada (name eludes me here) who was a weapons (artillery) Engineer who disappeared shortly after designing one for him. A short while later a pipe shipment from the USA to Iraq was thought to be suspicous and turned out to be sections of the barrel for said "Super Gun". We are not exactly without guilt in past years on such matters.

Very convenient to ignore the fact that Iran was a US partner for 20 years, as well as engaged in a productive relationship with Israel. They were economically successful and the people had more rights than they do now except for the Islamics. Under International law the American Embassy is considered United States property so the 1979 Government sponsored attack on the US embassy was in fact a declaration of war by Iran. Impossible to negotiate with islamics. They either get you or you get them. It is what it is. Like it or not.

When Iran was a US partner, it was because it was run by a US-installed dictator who used the SAVAK secret police to torture his citizens. Democracy is always better than dictatorship (which would you rather live under?) and the US destroyed the Iranian democracy.

I don't think you'd like it much if Iran toppled the US democracy and installed a pro-Iran dictator in Washington. Iran didn't like the 1953 coup either.

Convenient, too, to completely ignore the history of the differences between the deposed Shah and his father.

But go on with your ideology first and facts second. It is the way of the extremist, and it is all the rage.

It should be mentioned that it was the UK who supplied the capital, technology and equipment needed to pump oil from the gulf in 1905 and in 1950 PM Mossadegh's party broke a legal business contract (that was in litigation) with Britain to nationalize Iran's oil, cutting off cash flow to war-torn Britain and at the same time severing USA's oil supply. Also SAVAK was controlled by IRANIANS!

72 virgins and rivers of honey? Who writes for these guys, anyway? Yeah, okay, youbetcha!

Yes SAVAK was controlled by Iranians and the KGB was controlled by Russians... that didn't change the fact that the Soviet Union was a police state, as was Iran under the Shah.

@steve711, probably the same guy that got, what seams overnight, so many people shouting, "Jihad, Jihad". I remember the quiter days when all they said was "Yankee, go home". And some Southern boy stood up and said in your direction, "what did you do to piss them off?"

So true!

Actually no. The Germans prove they take this seriously. The Obama administration proved that it's still in the pocket of banksters. NY State was trying to do the right thing, but was pre-empted by the feds.

It's an absolute disgrace that they keep getting away with it.

Good idea but i really don't want to pay for them to be there. Just hang and get it over with. Now the problen is solved.

BINGO! Well put farideh. Sanctions don't even equal a slap on the wrist. The only people who suffer are those citizens in the targeted nation who are gouged at market for food, fuel etc. The lower class. A better step would be a blockade, but again, the suffering would be worse at the bottom of the ladder. Iran with nuclear weapons can only lead to one thing. World War. Iran WILL launch on Israel. The U.S. WILL retaliate because of our "friendship" (read "need for oil). I do NOT think we should start a land war, send troops in. Iraq and Afghanistan taught a lesson, though how far up the political ladder in the U.S. that lesson was REALLY learned, who knows. At the very top I doubt they learned much from the casualty reports they read. But how, then, to take a man out of power who's so disillusion he thinks the Holocaust was fiction? And if you DO manage it, how much worse will the next president be? It's the same problem in EVERY Middle Eastern nation. It's one we will NEVER SOLVE, because we think they can be made to be like us...and THEY CAN NOT. I do not feel we have the right to FORCE our form of government on them, either. Within 24 months another sociopath will be leading Iraq. Afghanistan is already deteriorating and we've not even pulled out yet. It's like dealing with a meth addict. You can't help them unless THEY WANT HELP. Imagine if Assad had tactical nukes right now? He is already bombing HIS OWN CIVILIAN POPULATION indiscriminately.

The Middle East is a powder keg and the fuse is lit. The trickle down HAS to effect the entire world, given the region exports the worlds second most important commodity (the first is HUMAN LIFE). Just the threat that something MIGHT happen SOME DAY in the next DECADE is enough to push petroleum prices through the roof. Until this entire region stabilizes the worlds economies will never stabilize. I'm no crazy end-of-the-world survivalist, but the events of the last ten years have spurred me to make preparations. No, the world isn't going to end in some giant conflagration, but SOCIETIES very well could. Iraq. Iran. Afghanistan. Syria. Egypt. Libya. Pakistan. This small corner of the world, unless we stop making toothless threats, will begin the chain of dominoes that will bring us ALL down.

Thanks for a very short, to the point statement that sums it all up with perfection.

Here is EnriqueTomanda pretending to be... what ? Spanish? Latino? What Enrique is, is a born-again anti-Semite which, of course, verifies not just his cosmic ignorance of facts, but spells "Me Terrorist" across his scrawny chest. Indelibly, in my book.

I prefer to quote Marie Antoinette to you Enrique... off with your head, or at least your voice box.

And your a Southern Baptist pretending to be an American and not force your Religious beliefs on anybody else. Saying all the while you have a right to your belief so long as it follows mine exactly. Yep, understood, yes sir.