Japan infuriates China by buying disputed isles

TOKYO -- Japan has agreed to buy a group of islands at the center of a territorial dispute with China, a government official said on Monday, prompting an angry rebuke from Beijing a day after Chinese President Hu Jintao warned against such an "illegal" move. 

Japan aimed to nationalize the uninhabited islands in the East China Sea as soon as possible to control them in a peaceful and stable manner, Chief Cabinet Secretary Osamu Fujimura said. 


The islands, called Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, are near rich fishing grounds and potentially huge maritime gas fields and have been at the heart of long-running territorial disputes between the world's second and third-largest economies. 

Japan’s government held a cabinet meeting on Monday and officially endorsed a plan to buy the islands from their private owner, despite denunciations from China, for a reported sum of $26 million.

Clinton urges cool heads in Japan-South Korea island dispute‎

Tension flared anew last month when Japan detained a group of Chinese activists who landed on the islands. But the row may now be having an economic impact, intensifying from merely an exchange of rhetoric, with a Chinese official saying Japanese car sales may have been hit in the world's biggest auto market. 

"This is just the ownership of land, which is part of Japan's territory, moving from one (private) owner to the state, and should not cause any problem with other countries," Fujimura said. 

"Having said that, we don't want the Senkaku issue to affect overall Sino-Japanese relations. Because it is important to avoid misunderstanding and unforeseen development, we have been closely communicating with China through diplomatic channels to this day." 

Much at stake for US as tensions rise in troubled China Seas‎

But China was firm in its opposition to what it saw as a "political trend". 

"This is a serious infringement of China's sovereignty and has seriously hurt the feelings of 1.3 billion Chinese..." the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. "The Chinese government and people express their resolute opposition and protest strongly." 

Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi called in Japanese Ambassador Uichiro Niwa to lodge a strong protest, while state-run Xinhua news agency cited Premier Wen Jiabao as saying China would "never yield an inch" of territory. 

The Japanese otter was declared extinct today by the Japanese government after not being spotted for over 30 years. NBCNews.com's Richard Lui reports.

Japanese govt spokesman Osamu Fujimura stressed that the purpose of the purchase is for Japan to maintain its peaceful and stable control of the islands, suggesting that no new structures will be built, and access to the islands will remain restricted.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5

HaHaHaHa,Thats Howya PissOff China! aLITTLeOF Their OWN Medicine!

  • 23 votes
#1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:56 PM EDT

And the kicker is that Japan is the closet country to these islands at @ 86-88 miles from their territory. PRC (communists) are the farthest away, then Taiwan.

  • 18 votes
#1.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:32 PM EDT

@Julie, and your point is what?? We own Hawaii and Alaska

  • 11 votes
#1.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:58 PM EDT

The point is, china owns so much land compared to japan, wtf, is it all that important? or maybe they got oil under or near them? ah who cares, get out the nukes and lets rock.

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:04 PM EDT

Yeah, lets rock and f*** up the whole planet and die right????stupid azz

  • 15 votes
#1.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

Well, China owns us too, so I would assume they are just continuing with their planetary conquest.

  • 10 votes
#1.5 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:23 PM EDT

rtrik, we don't "own" Hawaii and Alaska, they are part of the United States.

  • 16 votes
#1.6 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:29 PM EDT

Indiana, they may own us on a "balance sheet" somewhere, but I'd like to see them come and do a repo on us and taking our land.

Money is only a medium of exchange (legal tender). We can just file for international bankruptcy and protection from creditors (like China). After all, this IS OUR HOME.

American soil, blood and treasure is worth dying for. We have proven that over and over.

  • 7 votes
#1.7 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:32 PM EDT

goddamn, some people are misinformed. china doesn't even own an eighth of our debt. closer to a 1/16th.

  • 12 votes
#1.8 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:33 PM EDT

I have to agree How much is enough of anything, China's land mass is massive and so is there population but that does not give them the right to bully the Japanese.

  • 9 votes
#1.9 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:34 PM EDT

South China Sea doesn't belong to China, it is belong to Vietnam, Philippine, but China claims that it was theirs anyway.

The reason? One of the biggest rare Earth materials besides the massive amount in China.

What China is trying to do is to monopolize all rare-Earth materials and then raise the prices of all hi-tech equipment.

  • 12 votes
#1.10 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:44 PM EDT

China is mad because Japan opened their wallet first. Nice move Japan! Beat them commies at their own game.

  • 11 votes
#1.11 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:53 PM EDT
Comment author avatarCuongDNguyenExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

China is more capitalist now than communist. The deregulation makes it one of the most attractive place for corporations to invest.

  • 8 votes
#1.12 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:04 AM EDT

The deregulation is the reason corperations invest there. Cheap labor more profit, means more incentive to move a company there to export.

  • 1 vote
#1.13 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:13 AM EDT

CuongDNguyen:

China is more capitalist now than communist. The deregulation makes it one of the most attractive place for corporations to invest.

Capitalism is a form of an economic system. Communism is a form of government. There are two (2) separate items. China has welcomed the western world's approach to capitalism, but the national government is in total control.

In order for any non-Chinese business to operate in China, they must have a Chinese partner.

  • 8 votes
#1.14 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:27 AM EDT

Julie, you're a moron. Look at the map. It is closest to Taiwan, mainland China second and mainland Japan third.

  • 4 votes
#1.15 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:54 AM EDT

I'm no Whale poaching fan but piss on commie china.

  • 5 votes
#1.16 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:36 AM EDT

This is a huge power play by Japan that strengthens Americas hand against China. ;] Good work MY good friend B. ;]

Cheers

  • 6 votes
#1.17 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:39 AM EDT

Julie, you're a moron. Look at the map. It is closest to Taiwan, mainland China second and mainland Japan third.

Quite right. The proximity issue is not even close.

Historically, these islands were administered as part of the Formosa (Taiwan) province. The island chain was forcefully ceded to Imperial Japan (along with Taiwan) in the Treaty of Shimonoseki of 1895 which ended the first Sino-Japanese war. It was just one of the many unequal treaties that Qing China had to sign under such pressure at the time. When Japan surrendered at the end of World War II, they renounced all conquered territories including Taiwan. The U.S. occupation force then took over the administration of these islands and unilaterally reverted control back to Japan in 1972, over the protests from both ROC Taiwan and PRC China. Given that the U.S. was determined to keep a reliable foothold in East Asia against the USSR, it would not be surprising at all if some sort of backroom deal was involved. After all, it has already happened some 25 years earlier at the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal with all those 'immunity for data' deals struck between U.S. occupying force and accused Japanese war criminals. Imperial Japan got off far easier than Nazi Germany.

South China Sea doesn't belong to China, it is belong to Vietnam, Philippine, but China claims that it was theirs anyway.

Vietnam didn't lay administrative/territorial claim to the Spratly and Paracel Islands until the 18th century, under the Nguyen Dynasty. In contrast, China has been administering these island chains as part of the Hainan province since the 13th century Yuan Dynasty.

If that alone wasn't enough, Vietnam (North at the time) had accepted the Chinese claim to the Spratly and Paracel islands in 1958, in a letter written by then prime minister Phạm Van Dong himself. It wasn't done under duress. China never threatened to invade North Vietnam if they didn't comply. It was written voluntarily. Then after the North Vietnamese took over the entirety of the country after the war, they changed the story to say that they didn't have the legal right to comment on the territories which actually belonged to South Vietnam at the time??? If South Vietnam had won the war then this argument would have some merit but that's not the case. It just sounds like a bad case of flip-flopping and trying to sneak by on a technicality.

  • 6 votes
#1.18 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:01 AM EDT

In order for any non-Chinese business to operate in China, they must have a Chinese partner.

Utterly falsehood. Re-check your facts again. JV requirements only apply to certain restricted industries such as telecommunications, transportation, logistics, finance/banking, agriculture, etc. Other than JV, foreign companies also have the option of forming WFOE or the more recent variant, FICE when it comes to investing or doing business in China. As a matter of act, companies from other East Asian countries as well those from Europe and Australia have been operating under the latter for years since China entered the WTO. This is old news, try to keep up to date on the facts. Frankly, it would be idiotic for any country to not protect certain critical sectors of their domestic economy from a complete foreign take-over. Hell, we do it here in the U.S. too. It's okay for us but not for them? The delusion of grandeur that is American Exceptionalism indeed.

If you want to look at a country that is even more restricted when it comes to FDI, you may want to look at India.

http://rru.worldbank.org/BESnapshots/BecpProfilePDFRedirect.aspx

Scroll down to page 5 specifically.

Oh wait, never mind. I forgot that they are a fellow democratic nation and potential ally so we are not suppose to criticize them.

  • 6 votes
#1.19 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:31 AM EDT

Yes.............that's the whole pics. People here need to know that background........then talk about this issue.........................It's not just simple as buy and sale or by distant.

  • 1 vote
#1.20 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:44 AM EDT

I am a Chinese, we are not bully others,the land belong to us long time ago,the current owner got it illegally.just like the way the British got America from Indian,then rename it to "USA",then those British call himself "Americans". The Indian is too weak to get their lands back from invaders( so-called Americans now), but, we Chinese are NOT !

  • 6 votes
#1.21 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:02 AM EDT

If you're not, then do something about it other than listen to your leaders cry about how it hurts their feelings, wahhh wahhh wahhh. If the chinese people had any power they would have thrown over their idiot government long ago instead of being sheep to the red communist regime that isn't even the REAL chinese government anyhow. The real government of china fled to Taiwan years ago. Taiwan's government is the legitimate government of China.

  • 5 votes
#1.22 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:15 AM EDT

to Gary S.-365365 , if you are right ,then the Idian is the legitimate government of America .by the way ,why should I thrown over the government ? the government give 4000 usd a month to my family,the purchasing power is about 10000 usd in USA. you are so funny. :) thrown over the government ?

    #1.23 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:27 AM EDT

    george pauljohn

    The point is, china owns so much land compared to japan, wtf, is it all that important? or maybe they got oil under or near them? ah who cares, get out the nukes and lets rock.

    Laughed out so loud here at work reading this.. :D I was thinking the same thing.. Lets see how fast we can make the world spin

      #1.24 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:30 AM EDT

      Penlao, you're comparing apples to oranges. If you want to use that argument, then get the f**k out of Tibet. Also, learn how to spell, but I digress. The native americans of this country had many different tribes, each with their own territories overlapping the others. Which tribe do we turn the government over to? The Creek? The Chickasaw? The Cherokee? The Apache? etc. etc. I am part Chickasaw myself and I think I can safely say that we don't want to run the whole country, however, we do have our own self rule, which places like Tibet do not. Also, Your government does not "give" you anything. Do you have free speech? Can you elect leaders of your own choosing? What rights do you have specifically? Can you go outside and practice your religion openly, assuming you have one? I doubt it...that would be considered a threat to your sorry ass government, lmao

      • 4 votes
      #1.25 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:49 AM EDT

      Your government does not "give" you anything.

      Around 500-600 million Chinese citizens were lifted out of the global poverty level of less than $1.25 a day during the past 30 years of economic reform. That's a statistical data cited by the U.N., World Bank and IMF. With that said, I would think the current PRC government has at least had a partial hand in giving to their own people. Can't say much for the prior generation of cultural revolution crazed leadership who left the country in such bad shape in the first place however. Still, at least some Chinese citizens have begun to a adopt a less than favorable view of Mao in recent times.

      Do you have free speech?

      As a matter of fact they do have free speech on most topics. Chinese netizens criticize their own government all the time. There are also hundreds of protests every day in China, mostly over administrative, social and economic issues. The Chinese citizens simply aren't allowed to practice critical speech over non-anonymous public mediums or participate in open demonstrations that would challenge the authority of the central government. Protests against local level government and officials is fair game however.

      Can you elect leaders of your own choosing?

      They can though extremely limited. Thus far, open elections for public officials are primarily held on the village level. There are talks of expanding this system but so far, it is still in a trial phase in the coastal provinces.

      Can you go outside and practice your religion openly, assuming you have one?

      There are about 200 million Buddhists, 40 million Christians and 20 million Muslims currently in China. Now if you factor in Taoists, Chinese folk religion followers and nominally religious folks who adhere to an amalgamation of previously mentioned religious beliefs, that's another 300-400 million. Combined together, that's nearly 700 million Chinese citizens or more than half of their population who are at least somewhat religious. With that said, that number is still an underestimation. Chinese New Years, a week long holiday which nearly every Chinese celebrates, has many religious folklore and symbolism involved. Safe to say, they aren't a nation of 1.3 billion atheists.

      The difference between freedom of religion in China and the West is that outside religions which have a tendency of intruding into political circles such as Christianity, Catholicism and Islam are strictly regulated. Just because they aren't Christians nor want to be Christians doesn't mean they aren't religious. The same argument can be made for many other Asian countries with a long cultural history and identity with only short periods of exposure to western ideologies.

      You may want to take some time to do some deeper research or heck, actually visit China to see what things are really like. You might be surprised at just how different the current Chinese society actually is when compared to the imaginary world conjured up in your mind. Conversely, you could just retreat back into your cave and continue to perpetuate more ignorant myths and factually false talking points. It sure is easy to vilify someone when you refuse to learn anything about them.

      • 3 votes
      #1.26 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:39 AM EDT

      our average salary increased 13% for the past 5 years,and expected increasing at this speed for the next 5 years. how much your average salary increased ? the US government encourage Japan to have a war with China, the result is USD will depreciate . your Parliament are full of weapon sellers,steel makers,oil sellers. they can make a lot of money from war , but your people will suffer in depression caused by war your government started. your soldier are dying, your jobs are losing , your senators are counting their money .Nice circle !Nice government !

      • 2 votes
      #1.27 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:25 AM EDT

      I agree with many on here that Cuong's statement was inaccurate, but that was no reason to collpase the guy's statement. He wasn't rude or inflammatory, so I don't know what is wrong with some of you. You collapse anyone you disagree with. Wtf?

      Btw, I told someone to blow me the other day and got quite a few supporting votes for it. This guy gets collapsed for an opinion. I must have ventured into Bizarro World or something.

      • 5 votes
      #1.28 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:49 AM EDT

      I say let them duke it out...be interesting to see someone other than American soldiers and sailors die in a war. Besides if we want to contain the Chinese then there is probably noone more capable than the Japanese. If I were the Chinese I'd think about expanding to the North...Vietnam and India would be tough...oh I forgot the Russians are to the North. Maybe they should just shut up and do what they do best....provide cheap labor instead of providing alot of bodies to die.

        #1.29 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:05 AM EDT

        My, Gordon, you certainly seem to have an affinity for China. It must be because they have such a free and open society. Like the way the censors are treating anything with Xi Jinping's name in it, and the way they've been so forthcoming about his whereabouts.

        Or maybe it's the compassionate way they treat their citizens, displacing thousands to create the dangerous ecological disaster called the Three Gorges Dam.

        Or maybe it's the way they make veiled threats to Corvallis, OR because a Taiwanese-American citizen there is expressing himself artistically about the oppression of Taiwan and Tibet by painting a mural about Chinese atrocities.

        Or maybe it's the way they befoul their own land with pollution.

        Or maybe it's the fact that the Chinese are the worst technology and intellectual property theives the world has ever seen.

        Yep, pretty admirable people, those Chinese. I applaud Japan for essentially giving them the bird.

        • 2 votes
        #1.30 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:20 AM EDT

        Ron-975213 ,Russians are our ally, in UN we vote same direction, USA and UK vote another direction,we will not attack our ally,got it ? I do not feel i am talking to you, I feel I am teaching you,teaching you politics and history. May I ask, did you graduate from high school ? if you did,then high school in your country should open more useful class . I like to talk to someone with some knowledge about politics and history . not like you,I am more interested to see some American soldiers and sailors die in a war, who kill women and children for money,or just for fun, who you call heroes ,we call invaders. cheap labor? cheap labor make people in your country losing jobs,cheap labor make USD going down,cheap labor make US company bankrupt,cheap labor make our robbed land back from invader's hand.If American soldiers and sailors get in our way,we will treat them with missiles made by cheap labors !

          #1.31 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:35 AM EDT

          Nice trolling, Penlao.

          On the offhand chance you're serious, harm our soldiers and sailors and we'll burn your country to the ground. Nothing will live there for a thousand years.

          • 1 vote
          #1.32 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:50 AM EDT

          Mr. Tom-2709947,burn my country to the ground? why don`t you do it now ? because Russian will burn your country to the ground too. your senators want to make money from war,they don`t want to commit suicide . coward government you got there. I am telling you where this goes,we will get Diaoyu island back. your soldiers and sailors will fight a little,maybe, then they will pull back,like they did in Vietnam and North Korea . the so called United Nation burn my country to the ground 70 years ago,guess what,we grow back and kick them out. we are not afraid of UN, you think we are afraid of USA ?

          • 1 vote
          #1.33 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:19 AM EDT

          harm your soldiers and sailors and will burn my country to the ground? in Vietnam and North Korea we killed lot of your soldiers and sailors , and we are still here to kill more if you are in our way ! is boasting a habit in USA ?

            #1.34 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:40 AM EDT

            Why all the hate...? We are all people, discussing real estate and now all of a sudden it comes to verbal blows? Friends, that's how wars start. I am proud of where China has come from. Not long ago, this people suffered terribly and now it's getting better for them. Good for China!

            We Americans are so bloated with pride we have failed again to embrace our own injustices of taking advantage of that "cheap labor" and all the while we lose our integrity, industry and our dignity by doing so AND we now are stuck in huge debt by bloating the deficit every day yet, complaining about the foreign squabbles of countries that don't have anything to do with the topic.

            I love my country and I love the fact that my forefathers have given us so much to be proud of but to read some of the junk coming from this is not acceptable. We should take a real look at where this nation is and glean from Chinas vitality gained when we've on the other-hand, carelessly, given away our hard earned, God fearing right to that freedom we call upon when faced with opposition.

            God Bless America and help us see the forest from the trees!

              #1.35 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:47 AM EDT

              My, Gordon, you certainly seem to have an affinity for China. It must be because they have such a free and open society. Like the way the censors are treating anything with Xi Jinping's name in it, and the way they've been so forthcoming about his whereabouts.

              Yep, because I actually analyze the facts and tries to view things across a wider spectrum, it makes me an unabashed supporter of a 'perceived' anti-American force. Are you some sort of American Exceptionalism nationalist shill?

              Or maybe it's the compassionate way they treat their citizens, displacing thousands to create the dangerous ecological disaster called the Three Gorges Dam.

              In the process controlling a river whose massive floods have killed millions of Chinese through out history. That's a stone cold fact and it happens almost every year. Convenient to ignore this fact in order to make your straw man's arguement isn't it?

              Or maybe it's the way they make veiled threats to Corvallis, OR because a Taiwanese-American citizen there is expressing himself artistically about the oppression of Taiwan and Tibet by painting a mural about Chinese atrocities.

              The basis behind Tibetan soverignty is sketchy at best. At the end of the WWII, few countries even recognized Tibet is a soverign nation and even fewer had actual diplomatic ties. Then there's also the fact that in 1932, Tibet tried to take advantage of the outbreak of Sino-Japanese war near Manchuria by attempting to seize parts of Chinese territories in Xinjiang and Qinghai. After the war ended, Tibet expelled all Chinese nationals and seized their holdings in 1949 without cause, a move that was protested by the KMT and CCP at the time. Then in 1950, the PLA moved in and had a few small scale engagements against the Tibetan army before Lhasa capitulated and signed a treaty recognizing China's soverignty over Tibet. This part was relatively bloodless because China's forces never made it beyond the border regions. The Chinese crackdown on Tibetan opposition didn't begin in earnest until the late 1950's after years of CIA backed and funded insurgencies. All facts, look it up. There is always more than one side to the story.

              Many Tibetan supporters also like to throw out numbers when it comes to how China killed 1.2 million Tibetans during the crackdown of the late 50's going to into the 60's. This number has been widely challenged and disproved by historians across the world, regardless of nationality or affiliation. After all, there were only about 1.5 million Tibetan living in Tibet in 1953 or 6 years before the 'accused' Chinese massacres. In essence, what they claim is that China killed over 80% of the Tibetans? If that's true, who are these people living in Tibet today if the region has been effectively depopulated of native Tibetans some 50 years earlier?

              As for Taiwan, just what 'atrocities' has China committed there? Shooting a few missiles into the strait? Please enlighten me because even though I was born and raised in Taiwan, I am completely unaware of any genocides or mass murders China has perpetrated in Taiwan. Exaggerations and outright fabrications are the tools of the factually challenged.

              Or maybe it's the fact that the Chinese are the worst technology and intellectual property theives the world has ever seen.

              You may want to review the U.S. record of dealing with German scientists at the end of the WWII to see what IP theft at the point of the gun is really like. Your holier than thou pedestal is little more than a crumbling foundation.

              Keep preaching from your armchair while omitting inconvenient facts that does not comport to your one sided conclusions. You must be a graduate of the Josef Goebbels school of propaganda.

              • 3 votes
              #1.36 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:35 PM EDT

              Juile is somewhat geographically challenged in her assessment on relative distances.

              The Senkakus, reckoned from their geographical center of Shento-Bashi, is 110 miles from the nearest point on Taiwan, 247 miles from the nearest point on the Chinese mainland and 545 miles fro the nearest point in Japan proper.

              The islands belong to Taiwan, not to China or Japan. Unlike the much more contentious conflict between Japan and South Korea over the Doktos (the two countries have suspended regular diplomatic relations), this conflict is unlikely to result in war, and the US takes no side in it.

              • 2 votes
              #1.37 - Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:01 PM EDT

              Posters on this topic have made me giggle more than usual. A lot of economic ignorance and little understanding of what the money in everyone's hands really represents. Plus I can't imagine China is handing out actual dollars to Penlao, so possible troll bait there.

              As for a military conflict, not likely. What the real danger for America/China relations is if to many bad growing seasons in a row causes food prices to skyrocket. That and if interest rates start to rise then both the purchasing of China's goods will decline and inflationary pressure will devalue Chinese dollar holdings. *Those* things matter at the leadership level, not some stupid specs of islands.

              That said, it could easily be a pretense to mix things up in the region and China might send in massive military strength into the area after Taiwan and Japan duke it out then pulls a "Hail Mary" into Taiwan, thus finally conquering the original displaced government of China. It wouldn't be without precedent, as the events during and after WWII essentially played out that scenario when the KMT suffered greatly defending China against Japan while the CPC did little. And when victory against Japan was assured the CPC took advantage to great effect of the KMT weakened state and pulled off their Coo.

                #1.38 - Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:27 PM EDT

                lee-2266415 Said:

                "goddamn, some people are misinformed. china doesn't even own an eighth of our debt. closer to a 1/16th."

                Yes, but at $1.2 trillion, China is still the the third largest holder of US debt, behind only our own Social Security Trust ($3 trillion) and the Federal Reserve ($2 trillion). That's damn scary if you ask me.

                  #1.39 - Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:34 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  About time someone had the balls to stand up to them.

                  • 26 votes
                  Reply#2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:06 PM EDT

                  EXACTLY my sentiments Mike. I am beginning to think our US gov't officials are scared to death of China................................. "or is it the loss of Chinese cash being stuffed into the pockets of Wash DC congressmen and senators????????." LoL

                  Gutless.

                  • 16 votes
                  #2.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:55 PM EDT

                  well the republicans sure like making sweetheart grain deals for their wealthy farmer friends that's for sure

                  • 4 votes
                  #2.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:02 PM EDT

                  Well now you know what Nixon gave away when he went to talk to Chairman Mau.

                  • 1 vote
                  #2.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:06 PM EDT

                  leftrightcenter,

                  Yeah, while Clinton just sold them nukes.

                  • 11 votes
                  #2.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:06 PM EDT

                  @ Leftrightcenter,

                  yeah, those Republicans could sure learn some table manners from the pristine Democrats. That's for sure.

                  • 6 votes
                  #2.5 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

                  george...........it's Chairman Mao, you ignoramous. Not Mau. You should have stayed in school after the fifth grade.

                  • 7 votes
                  #2.6 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:31 PM EDT

                  Geez SoSick, lighten up. Is it necessary to use name calling and demeaning comments to make your point?

                  You would have more credibility if you debate in a humane way.

                  • 14 votes
                  #2.7 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:37 PM EDT
                  Comment author avatarMichael Mellnickvia Facebook

                  NC-492358 Why would we sell either nukes? Japan and China are both already nuclear powers.

                  • 1 vote
                  #2.8 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:43 PM EDT
                  Comment author avatarSoSickoftheGopExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                  Credibility comes from being correct. I'm always correct. You don't even know the meaning of the word ignoramus, do you, you ignoramus.

                  • 3 votes
                  #2.9 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:45 PM EDT

                  SoSick, You are one piece of RIDICULOUS CAKE with no bounds of lunacy. You say that Japan was NOT part of the the Axis powers when Japan attacked US forces in WW2.

                  YOU ARE FLAT DEAD WRONG......... as you have been over and over on your posts here. Put your crack pipe down and go to bed. Here it is ..............................

                  The Axis grew out of the Anti-Comintern Pact, an anti-communist treaty signed by Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan in 1936.

                  Now go to bed. Your credibility is down to ZERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                  • 10 votes
                  #2.10 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:55 PM EDT

                  SoSick, your comment about always being correct is at best relative. One thing that is correct is your grade school mentality and vocabulary.

                  • 4 votes
                  #2.11 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:37 AM EDT
                  Reply

                  "[Japan's purchase of the islands] has seriously hurt the feelings of 1.3 billion Chinese..."

                  I have to admit I quit reading when I reached this sentence. I had to laugh. Guess some things don't translate well. Too funny.

                  • 22 votes
                  Reply#3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:34 PM EDT

                  Yeah, I laughed at that, too!

                  • 13 votes
                  #3.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:06 PM EDT

                  I agree, best line in the article.

                  Cry me a river China!

                  • 7 votes
                  #3.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:33 PM EDT

                  I liked that too, i kept reading though. China is such a joke sometimes.

                  • 4 votes
                  #3.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:57 PM EDT

                  You won't laugh if someone who burned your house, killed your relatives, and maimed you 60 years ago and tell you that I will buy one of your son for a dollar. Well, Chinese was trying to get pass the history and be a friend with Japan, but all we got is this. How you would feel as a normal human being?

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.4 - Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:17 AM EDT

                  First,how can Japan buy islands from a Japanese "owner".When the islands didn't belong to him to begin with.

                  Second,Clinton never "sold" China nukes.China developed their own bomb in the 60's.

                  Third,there probably won't be a war over this.But if there was the Japanese would surely have to worry about those Chinese nukes.And the limitless army China could field.

                  Forth. historically the islands were China's until Japan seized them in the 1895 war.China has never accepted there loss.And any Japanese claim to them is spurious.

                    #3.5 - Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:45 AM EDT

                    You won't laugh if someone who burned your house, killed your relatives, and maimed you 60 years ago and tell you that I will buy one of your son for a dollar. Well, Chinese was trying to get pass the history and be a friend with Japan, but all we got is this. How you would feel as a normal human being?

                    Americans have never been through this type of scorched earth, total war that Japan waged in China during WWII. The closest approximation would be Union General Grant's march to Atlanta during the Civil War and many southerners are STILL seething about it some 150 years later. As such, they simply can not comprehend why many Chinese are still angry about the Japanese government whitewashing history at every turn.This is also the reason why some Americans can be so chickenhawkish about going to war because it is someone else' son they're sending to a land far, far away, not their own backyard.

                    It's also amusing how so many Americans of today think of Japan in a buddy buddy fashion. During the 1970's and 80's, Japan was the export juggernaut that the U.S. citizenry and politicians were scared of, much like the China of today. Then there are those plentiful 'no gaijin (foreigner) allowed' establishments in Japan to this very day. Ignorance is bliss for these uninformed folks.

                      #3.6 - Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:42 AM EDT
                      Reply

                      To whom does this private owner pay property tax? Of what country is he a citizen? The Chinese empire's borders need challenging by the international community in Tibet as well.

                      • 18 votes
                      Reply#4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:55 PM EDT

                      And Mongolia

                      • 15 votes
                      #4.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:28 PM EDT
                      Comment author avatarSoSickoftheGopExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                      The owner is Mitt Romney, and he doesn't pay taxes. It's another of his offshore money storehouses.

                      • 10 votes
                      #4.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:04 PM EDT

                      Oh? Prove that Romney does not pay taxes. If you can't, then you are a liar/liberal...same thing.

                      • 14 votes
                      #4.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:07 PM EDT

                      Good point, they take over Tibet which is a pretty large area, cause they got no army, and that's fine fine fine. but lose a rock or two in the ocean and they get their wittle fewings hurt, NUKE EM!

                      • 6 votes
                      #4.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:08 PM EDT
                      Comment author avatarSoSickoftheGopExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                      NC................Prove that he does. Or better yet, let HIM prove that he does. Oh,yeah, I forgot, he doesn't want to. He did a bunch of illegal sh!t and doesn't want anyone to know it. His magic underwear will protect him. What do you use?

                      • 5 votes
                      #4.5 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:34 PM EDT
                      Comment author avatarMichael Mellnickvia Facebook

                      NC-492358 are you aware it was his own father that set the precedent of releasing 10 years worth of tax returns if you intend to run for president .

                      • 3 votes
                      #4.6 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:45 PM EDT

                      Sosick.....We have a department of the federal government called the Internal Revenue Service. I'm sure that his tax returns have been thoroughly investigated and reviewed by that department in recent months. Obama would never leave that stone unturned. So put a sock in it please.

                      • 3 votes
                      #4.7 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:49 AM EDT

                      I dont make millions. I dont even break 6 digits and I wouldnt show you or anyone else my tax returns either. The way I figure it, most people that complain about the rich paying the lower tax rate from investments is just mad that they dont know how to do it themselves.

                      • 5 votes
                      #4.8 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:38 AM EDT

                      I find it inherently amusing that we, a nation of 236 years who has been throwing our military weight around the world for the better part of the last 60 years, is accusing China of imperialism, hell bent on conquering the world. This is the same China with 2200 years of dynastic history who actually had the military and economic capability to conquer large parts of the known world on many occasions during that span. The Han dynasty was arguably on the same economic and military level of their contemporary, the Roman Empire. Several hundred years later, the economic and military prowess of the Tang Dynasty drastically out-classed every other nation/state of their era. Another several hundred years go by and the Ming Dynasty became the preeminent naval power of its time, as demonstrated by Zheng He's massive expedition fleets going all the way to Africa. Yet through out this combined 900+ years of peak power, China didn't bother to conquer or colonized large swatches of the world. What a mystery.

                      In reality, China through out history is primarily obsessed with securing their own borders. They have always been known as a regional hegemon as opposed to a global hegemon like the British, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian or French empires of old, as well as the now defunct Soviet Union and America of today. This fear mongering of China out of conquer the world is pure lunacy. They wouldn't know what do even if they managed to conquered another continent.

                      It sure sounds like we have a lot of Americans who are just angry at the fact that someone dared to challenge our global primacy and not simply restrict themselves to a subservient role like the second class global citizen that they are.

                      • 4 votes
                      #4.9 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:55 AM EDT

                      Americans arn't imperialist. We usually just blow people up and then come home. Who knows why but we usually help pay to rebuild their countries. The people in power are nicer than I am.

                      • 1 vote
                      #4.10 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:03 AM EDT

                      Americans arn't imperialist. We usually just blow people up and then come home. Who knows why but we usually help pay to rebuild their countries. The people in power are nicer than I am.

                      When it comes to the America today, it is somewhat debatable. We maintain some 100-150 medium/large and over 500 smaller military installations/sites across the world. This visible power projection is eerily similar to the way that the British and Spanish empires used to do it except we aren't annexing entire countries to turn them into U.S. territory. Then there are those rather numerous convert attempts of installing pro-America governments, particularly in Central and Latin America which we considered to be our backyard. The side-effects of those activities are still causing us headaches and trust issues across the region today.

                      Historically however, there is little doubt that U.S. had at least some imperialistic designs at one point. More specifically, I'm referring to the period of mid 19th to early 20th century. To start, one may argue that the entire concept of Manifest Destiny as justification for the Mexican-American war was an imperialist policy. After that came the conquest of Hawaii, Philippines, Cuba, Puerto Rico and other ceded territories such as Guam during the latter half of that period. It was also during this period that the U.S. participated in the eight-nation alliance which invaded China to put down the Boxer Rebellion and subsequently demanded equal access to the various foreign spheres of influence dotting the Chinese landscape.

                      The history of American imperialism/expansionism is far shorter and at times less aggressive or transparent but it was still there regardless. We just preferred to call it by a different name such as 'the world's policeman' in order to create a distinction where none really exists.

                      • 2 votes
                      #4.11 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:19 AM EDT

                      You are correct, but I would like to point out that many of those bases stem from treaty obligations from post WWII and/or the Cold War.

                      We are, in fact, legally responsible for the military defense of several countries; directly or indirectly. So yes, we do have many bases around the world. However, a lot of them are there because if the host countries would be attacked, we would be responsible for their defense.

                      • 2 votes
                      #4.12 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:05 AM EDT
                      Reply

                      Possession is 9/10ths of the law. (Except to communists.)

                      • 11 votes
                      Reply#5 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:57 PM EDT

                      cool, I'll steal your car

                      • 6 votes
                      #5.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:03 PM EDT

                      We should have listened to general Patton. He said lets keep going and take russia and china, but noooooooooooooooooooooooo we didn't listen.

                      • 14 votes
                      #5.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:11 PM EDT

                      Muff. Hehe....I said muff.

                      • 2 votes
                      #5.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:45 PM EDT

                      Who the f... cares what China thinks. Oh wait, Obama does.

                      • 8 votes
                      #5.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:54 PM EDT

                      more like, the Rommunist does.

                      • 1 vote
                      #5.5 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:20 AM EDT

                      Well see if China went by that rule, they'd just curb stomp Taiwan, those islands and definitively do so to Tibet, and then they'd possess them, thereby being 90% legitimate, according to what you just said. Clearly that's not the way the law goes if it's China doing the possessing.

                      All this being said, I'm interested to know who the private owner was. Inflammatory detail left out.

                      That also being said, if I own my home and the land around it, can I then sell it to the country I see wants to buy it?

                      I'm pretty sure that's not legal in my own country.

                      o.O Those are my questions about this.

                      • 1 vote
                      #5.6 - Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:11 AM EDT
                      Reply

                      Very well done Japan!!! Cheers!!!

                      The imperialist appetite of Chiness governement has no frontiers... They can't even give a good quality of life in all their vast territories, but they want more... More... MOOOORRREEE!!!

                      • 13 votes
                      Reply#6 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:19 PM EDT

                      They can't even give a good quality of life in all their vast territories, but they want more...------------------------------------------------this is why the japanese invaded other Asian countries in the Second world war,you think other countries can not give good quality of life in their own territories,then you have reason to invade and rob......pervert under gentleman coat

                      • 2 votes
                      #6.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:24 PM EDT

                      Tony............. It's a whole new world since the end of WW2.

                      Japan is a far different country. China has changed far less. I don't think Japan is interested in attacking anyone in this age. However, for China declaring ownership of strategic islands just minutes from Japan's shores.................... NO WAY BUDDY!!!!!!!!

                      Haven't you seen the chopped up heads of Tibet Monks by Chinese troops recently??? Wake up.

                      • 11 votes
                      #6.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:04 PM EDT

                      And why did Japan invade the U. S.? Our quality of life was fine. Japan was just power crazy and as conceited as a country can be. They thought they were the best and could do whatever the he!! they wanted to. I think we showed them that they were incorrect, though. Now we need to show them again. They need to stop whaling. Now.

                      • 2 votes
                      #6.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:09 PM EDT

                      SoSick........ Uh, I think your history is a little off. Japan saw their economy headed for ruins if they didn't do something about US economic policy of the time. So, they sided with the Axis powers and attacked. Even today US economic policy is destructive to some nations that would attack us if they could.

                      Japanese were our allies in WW1.

                      I agree with your whaling issues, but look what our gov't is allowing Big Oil to do here on our own soil. They are likely destroying our ground water by "fracking."

                      Judge NOT lest Ye be judged.

                      • 4 votes
                      #6.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:24 PM EDT

                      13............I think YOU had better read up on your history. They weren't part of the Axis when they attacked Pearl Harbor.

                      • 1 vote
                      #6.5 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:36 PM EDT

                      I just farted on a canoli and gained the interest of more people than this crap article.

                        #6.6 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:41 PM EDT

                        Not on paper at the time....... but we are pretty sure Hitler and the Axis powers liked what Japan was doing. "Sided with" does not necessarily mean a document was involved.

                        We try to keep posts short here so people will read them. Extreme detail is not a good idea.

                        • 2 votes
                        #6.7 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:41 PM EDT

                        13.........Extreme detail is not important when you're unfamiliar with the facts, that's true. It's called making sh!t up. Hitler wasn't even with the Axis at that time.

                        "We" try to keep posts short here? OMG I didn't know you owned this site. Go get a different one. I like details.

                        • 3 votes
                        #6.8 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:50 PM EDT

                        SoSick, You are one piece of RIDICULOUS CAKE with no bounds of lunacy. You say that Japan was NOT part of the Axis powers when Japan attacked US forces in WW2.

                        YOU ARE FLAT DEAD WRONG......... as you have been over and over on your posts here. Put your crack pipe down and go to bed. Here it is ..............................

                        The Axis grew out of the Anti-Comintern Pact, an anti-communist treaty signed by Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan in 1936.

                        Now go to bed. Your credibility is down to ZERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                        • 8 votes
                        #6.9 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:00 AM EDT

                        Hitler liked what the japanese were doing so much in fact, that he called them yellow aryans, lmao

                        • 3 votes
                        #6.10 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:24 AM EDT
                        Reply

                        China seems to be picking fights with quite a few neighbors now. Vietnam, Japan, India, and the others experiencing this treatment from China are likely to band together. This has become so serious that even the Philippines, who have been very cool towards the United States for years, are seeking American assistance. I do not think that it is in China's interest to antagonize so many other countries at once. Many of these countries are very sensitive to foreign control or domination, and will not back down if they feel that their internationally recognized territories are under threat. It is a simmering pot that could boil over.

                        • 13 votes
                        Reply#7 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:14 PM EDT

                        The Diaoyu Dao belongs to China,always!The japanese are pervert under gentleman coat,the criminal to all Asian people,if they can buy an island today,torrow they will "buy" all Asian,not by money,by guns,like they did in the second world war...

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#8 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:19 PM EDT

                        All your base are belong to us.

                        • 7 votes
                        #8.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:54 PM EDT

                        Geez Tony, You are living in the past. Japan is a great ally of the USA and the FREE WORLD. China is trying to own the world................ Just like Hitler!!!!!!!!!

                        • 12 votes
                        #8.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

                        What?

                          #8.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

                          Japan is no one's ally. They'll show their true colors soon, just like they did in WWII. They take whatever they want, even if it's not theirs. And then they lie about it. They fish illegally all over the world.

                          • 3 votes
                          #8.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:15 PM EDT

                          NObody remembers that the evil Japs are not trustworth! They LIED to Americans when they wanted a peace agreement and attacked us when we were asleep

                          AND they fish illegally all over the world

                          • 2 votes
                          #8.5 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:20 PM EDT

                          +2 internets

                          • 1 vote
                          #8.6 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:23 PM EDT

                          Japan is a very strong ally and we have many similar traits and everything you guys are listing is something the U.S does this very day. In fact any country would do that if they had the opportunity, don't think the U.S is all high and mighty in morality when in fact we done some @!$%#ed up stuff too.

                          Plus they don't fish illegally, it's international waters, they don't have to follow rules listed by other countries and they are doing that because that is their way of life, eating seafood is like Americans eating beef.

                          If anything you guys are living in the past, that happen over 70 years ago i bet none you were even around in that time.

                          • 5 votes
                          #8.7 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:33 PM EDT

                          It's not international waters that they fish in idiot. Ask Australia. Ask any country with a coastline. They steal fish everywhere.

                          And yes, you fricking idiot, I was around at that time. Do you ever talk about high school? Then you're living in the past too. Idiot.

                          • 1 vote
                          #8.8 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:40 PM EDT

                          My My SoSick. Name calling is what people do when they are wrong in their argument. In the world of civil debate people know they have won when their opponent begins use name calling and abusive tirades.

                          You lose. Divine is right.

                          • 9 votes
                          #8.9 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:47 PM EDT

                          They do fish in international waters, so if one boat goes into Australia coast and everyone is all hurt they are stealing the fish when in fact fish travel freely between waters and are own by no one. Plus they don't show everyone else stealing fish, just Japan, when in fact everyone is doing it. When you are fishing you follow those fish and you don't care about other countries coastline, because you don't pay attention to that.

                          The second comment makes no sense, if you were around at the time didn't you grow up by a better standard? Cursing and swearing at me for no reason and calling me a idiot is no way to argue your point and shows that you are probably not seventy years old.

                          I like how you liked your comment to try and make it so someone agreed with you.

                          • 6 votes
                          #8.10 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:51 PM EDT

                          13.........No, Divine isn't right. Not factually. I don't say things if they're not true. That's what debating is about, facts. It's so sad you didn't know that.

                          • 1 vote
                          #8.11 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 PM EDT

                          Divine...........Cursing and swearing? You don't even know the meaning of those words.

                          Can you leave one comment without being wrong about something? You don't even know the definition of International waters. And the difference between those and waters that belong to countries. That makes you an idiot when you comment on things you know nothing about. Fish travel freely between waters? That has nothing to do with what we're discussing, but you're such an idiot you don't know that. And everyone is not doing it. And if they were................would that make it right? I know, I know, to you it would.

                          • 1 vote
                          #8.12 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:58 PM EDT

                          How come you treat him with some respect but yet you verbally assault me?

                          • 4 votes
                          #8.13 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:01 AM EDT

                          You said fricking that is another word for the F word, so yes i do know what those words are.

                          Can you leave one comment without being totally American bias?

                          I do know what international waters are and mean.

                          As i said in my comment a Japanese boat happens to travel from international water into another countries coastal waters, happens to be fishing and it makes the front page in every environmental magazine.

                          Yes fish traveling between water has everything to do with this, the Japanese are following the fish or whales, if it happens to enter another counties coastline it doesn't matter, because they were initially following them from the start in international waters or their coastal waters, so they are using a loophole that is totally legal.

                          Everyone does this, we fish Tuna in Japanese coastline or territory, yet they don't complain. It's not illegal for them to fish whale, because they don't follow other countries rules and regulations, they have their own.

                          And yes if everyone is doing it does make it right for that country, we did this in the past, yet we are holding the Japanese up to respond in a way we want them too. Whether that way be right is based solely on perspective. That way is not fishing whales and they don't have to listen to us, just like China is burning insane amounts of fossil fuels, damaging their air and going to possibly make global warming ten times worse if they continue like we did in the past without any regulations. They won't listen to us because it will hurt their economic development.

                          • 4 votes
                          #8.14 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:14 AM EDT
                          Reply

                          if the japanese dare to instigate the third world war,i think they will taste the third nuclear bomb in tokyo.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#9 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:29 PM EDT

                          Gee, Tony you really think the problem can be solved that quickly?

                          • 2 votes
                          #9.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:50 PM EDT

                          Instigate? Japan isn't doing anything wrong. China is just bitter.

                          • 8 votes
                          #9.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:58 PM EDT

                          You are an idiot. China tries to bully its neighbors and others into submission. Fortunately for the rest of the world China's cultural memory regarding war is one of continual defeat.

                          • 5 votes
                          #9.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:04 PM EDT

                          LOL, probably not the right time to start a nuclear war. China is about 30 years away from becoming a real force and Japan knows it.

                          Maybe power does not come from barrel of gun.....yet

                          • 2 votes
                          #9.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:13 PM EDT

                          It's never the right time to start a nuclear war and it should never come to that. Except i most certainly believe Iran is going to @!$%# that all up.

                          • 5 votes
                          #9.5 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:41 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          Japan and other nations are very worried about China as Chinese gunboats roam at will in these areas. It is not the land so much as the billions of barrels of oil under the sea around these islands and others that both China and Korea, Japan, et. al. claim.

                          • 4 votes
                          Reply#10 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:49 PM EDT

                          .... China is a huge country... now much land is enough ???

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#11 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:49 PM EDT

                          Let's use America as a standard, and then look at all the illegal acts and war crimes commited taking that land. China is a good stuend of ours it seems.

                          • 1 vote
                          #11.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:04 PM EDT

                          Leftrightcenter,

                          You are correct. You should leave this nasty old America now and live in China.

                          • 7 votes
                          #11.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:09 PM EDT

                          leftrightcenter

                          get out of my United States [ and learn how to spell...]

                          • 2 votes
                          #11.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:13 PM EDT

                          NC and Michael...........You must both be Republicraps. They are the only ones who cannot "win" a conversation without telling someone to leave the U.S. Losers. The U.S. doesn't belong to you two ditzes.

                          • 4 votes
                          #11.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:20 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          C'mon China,they are just little pebbles in the sea.

                            Reply#12 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:52 PM EDT

                            @tony8093 Really you want them to get bombed and innocent people killed over THIS? Also spell check I use it all the time it works.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#13 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:53 PM EDT

                            Miss.M................People have been killed for lots less. And ideas are more important than spell check. Use you brain. I use mine all the time.

                            • 2 votes
                            #13.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:22 PM EDT

                            @So Sick Of - That's funny!

                            • 1 vote
                            #13.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:41 PM EDT

                            On the upside, it would help with the over-population problem.

                            • 1 vote
                            #13.3 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:57 AM EDT
                            Reply

                            Spoken like a true dumb ass American.

                            Would you like the growing economic power of China to have it instead?

                              Reply#14 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:54 PM EDT

                              Spoken like an American "wannabe".

                                #14.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:10 PM EDT

                                Redemptionblue

                                Now you sound like an ignorant ass. Anyone who is biased is a dumb ass. Where are you from?

                                • 3 votes
                                #14.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:20 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                tony,

                                Calm down and offer a higher price...let the bidding begin. Do I here one billion? This island belongs ot a private owner and wants to sell to Japan.

                                Do you actually think the world buys you're claims? We have watched China long enough to spot a shake down.

                                Sorry Japan has hurt you're feelings...get over it...the sooner the better.

                                Next

                                • 7 votes
                                Reply#15 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:54 PM EDT

                                Japan took it after the first Sino-Japanese War in the 1894. Then Japan sold it to a private Japanese owner in the 1930's. As it took the land in 1894, it should have given it back to China, whether Taiwan ROC or mainland PRC after Cairo declaration to end WWII. However, wester powers in the San Fransico Treaty, didn't include ROC or PRC China and gave the islands to US for temporary guardianship instead. Then USA gave it to Japan in 1970's.

                                This private Japanese owner is only allowed to sell the islands to Japan so even if China want to buy it back, it could not.

                                Thus this entire problem is an extention of China and Japan problem for 100 years as well as a legacy of a wrongful act at the hands of western powers after WWII.

                                • 1 vote
                                #15.1 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:58 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                It's not like they went there by boat and stuck a flag in the ground. It belonged to a private owner and since he wanted to sell to Japan, Japan gets it.

                                I think that is pretty fair.

                                • 4 votes
                                Reply#16 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:57 PM EDT

                                LOL, that is a stupid statement. Its just like saying if you are a landowner in Florida and decide to sell a piece of land to a Jap, Japs get it ahahahhaha

                                • 3 votes
                                #16.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:00 PM EDT

                                jsmith......... are you trying to say that hasn't already happened in America?

                                How much of America does China currently own? Geezzz-OH-Mighteeee

                                • 4 votes
                                #16.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:12 PM EDT

                                Foreigners may own pieces of US land but that does not make that land part of their country.

                                • 1 vote
                                #16.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:17 PM EDT

                                Correct! These islands were on China maps for centuries until they were taken over by Japs when they captured Taiwan and hundreds of other islands during ww2. The Russians have the same problem but they did not get resistance when they disputed their islands and Putin visited them.

                                China needs to get tough and make a deal with Putin

                                • 1 vote
                                #16.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:23 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                If 1.3 billion Chinese are so seriously offended, why didn't their own government buy the land? China is blustering about insigificance trying to save face from some petty issue.

                                • 3 votes
                                Reply#17 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:57 PM EDT

                                Owner is not allowed to sell land to another government outside of Japan. When the major of Tokyo, the famous right wing Ishihara want to buy, he is buying under the local government flag. China has no chance to bid even if they wanted to

                                  #17.1 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:02 PM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  The Evil Japs are liars just like when they attacked Pearl Harbor which most Americans seem to have forgotten..... Nor do most people remember that the Japs were the most ruthless invaders of all time.......

                                  Advice to China: Increase Nuclear Sub technology and aim your missiles at TOKYO NOT TAIPEI!!!

                                  • 2 votes
                                  Reply#18 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:57 PM EDT

                                  And how long ago was Pearl Harbor? Oh yes over 70 years ago.

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #18.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:02 PM EDT

                                  So What? Why do you think AMERICA disarmed the Japs at the end of WW2????? Thousands of Americans died at Pearl Harbor you dumb azz!

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:05 PM EDT

                                  Well then the jews should be getting over the holocaust already too then.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #18.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:06 PM EDT

                                  "Evil Japs" Are you 90 years old? WHy don't you just call them, "Grinning yellow devils?" Clearly, you learned history from watching old war movies.

                                  • 6 votes
                                  #18.4 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

                                  And the the USA bombed TWO places in Japan. Killing even more people, also you do know the US is friends with Japan now?

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.5 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:09 PM EDT

                                  At least I learned world history and dont read comic books or Manga comics like you dumb azz who know nothing about what happened when the evil Japs and Nazis killed over 30 million people in the world

                                  Remember, China was our ally but nobody wants to remember that because its much easier to be racist and bash China

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.6 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:15 PM EDT

                                  Go ask the Jews to forget about Hitler and tell them who cares?????

                                  LOL

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.7 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:16 PM EDT

                                  Okay racist? Said the pot to the kettle.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #18.8 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:26 PM EDT

                                  MissM......................if you ever make the 70 year mark, you'll see how short a time that is. You are such an ignorant person. Read a little history sometime. I know, I know, you have to learn how to read first. It'll keep you busy. Maybe for the next 70 years.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.9 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:28 PM EDT

                                  If I live that long but forget to move on in life, well I hope I die before that. Also it was a nice burn at the end.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #18.10 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:41 PM EDT

                                  Those of you using the term "Evil Japs." You are PATHETIC, probably very OLD and as "close-minded" as people can become.

                                  What do you guys have to say about the systematic butchering of Native Americans by the US government.................? and the taking of their homelands, putting them on reservations and giving them disease infested clothes and blankets.

                                  How about the abuse, torture and death inflicted on black slaves in the good ole USA?

                                  There is an UGLY side to almost every culture and nation in this world at some point in history. Dredging up past atrocities only serves to keep the hate alive and suppresses healing.

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #18.11 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:02 AM EDT

                                  240,000+ Japanese were killed over the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I'm not one to compare lives, but I would say it more than compensated for the attack on Pearl Harbor.

                                  One could debate history and morals until the end of time, but why here? This is an article about Japan buying some islands that China probably deems a lucrative resource. You think if, by some chance, war betweeen China and Japan eventually breaks out over this event historians will reference back and say, "You know those trolls, in the msn article, really had their finger on the pulse of trending world events..." rofl

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #18.12 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:16 AM EDT

                                  Oh and I second your sentiment exactly 13dew.

                                    #18.13 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:18 AM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    KountryKing, from the way the article reads, the private owner was Japanese. It said it was only going from the private owner to government owner. China has no rights to this land, just wanting to use their muscle in getting what it wants.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#19 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:00 PM EDT

                                    In the immortal words of Nelson "HA-HA"!

                                    • 3 votes
                                    Reply#20 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:01 PM EDT

                                    and has seriously hurt the feelings of 1.3 billion Chinese..."

                                    I must say I get a laugh out of that statement......seriously hurt the feelings............

                                    Unless the government is real fast at counting opinions, there might be a few Chinese who don't care, regardless of what their government tells them to feel.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    Reply#21 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:01 PM EDT

                                    So glad my "evil Jap" uncles fought in the US Army in WWII for sorry suckers like you, jsmithzzzzzzz.

                                    They were better Americans than you'll ever be.

                                      #21.1 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:37 PM EDT
                                      Reply

                                      The land grabbing China is always looking to instigate turmoil in Asia, with their land grabbing in Sri Lanka, and the problems they are creating in the region of South East Asia that includes Mynamar, Laos, Vietnam, and the Philippines. It is good that at least Japan is able to stand against these tyrants who impose death and destruction against it's own people when they speak up. Oh yes Tony, hopefully if there is a third world war, Japan too will wake up and use its nuclear might to kick the ass of China. Hopefully, that will stop them from dumping their inferior products world wide and causing sickness amongst people as ell as animals.

                                        Reply#22 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:02 PM EDT

                                        You dont make any *(*(*& sense, you go home and read your history books and then go to walmart and check who owns that place: a White American man named Sam Walton who buys all the "inferior products" and check the Apple Store and learn that a White American named Steve Jobs who built all his factories in China because Americans dont want to work but want to get food stamps from Obama

                                          #22.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:38 PM EDT

                                          wow.........there is an american who has courage to point out. Thank for your decent. Japanese is the only who's never face to the fact and history, and never plead guilty in the world war II even they signed" the potsdam proclamation". (talk about this issues , people should know history and to get the whole picture).Today Janpanese leaders still pay homage to yasukuni jinjia where Dedicated to class - A war criminals each year. they still paead guilty as 'comfort women' ,holocaust..........
                                          talk about this issues people might read Article 8th supplementary provisions of <the potsdam proclamation>. Then things would be clear.
                                          "WE COULD FORGIVE BUT WOULD NEVER FORGET" that part of history at least people whos have been through that tragedy, some of them are still alive.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #22.2 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:56 AM EDT

                                          jsmithzzzzz: Then Nixon decided communist China would be more beneficial to business and world peace. Which has continued to this day under our corporations request for cheap products and labor. Since that time our cost of products (INFLATION) has increased a thousand fold, while supposed cost decreased by hundreds of percent. You figure it out, food stamps or famine. I guess your a big fan of the workers party. What a great American you are.

                                            #22.3 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:42 AM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            Even if you are a private landowner, the government is still the ultimate "owner" and you cannot change nationality, the area is disputed and has been part of China and Taiwan for centuries

                                            When the Japs conquered Taiwan, they took it and never gave it back when the lost the war

                                            • 2 votes
                                            Reply#23 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:02 PM EDT

                                            Your derogatory term referring to the japanese people and twisting of this comment board, in other posts, to become some debate about republicans/democrats/obama only furthers proof of your ingnorance.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #23.1 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:30 AM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            So, but the islands from a private owner, then wave the receipt in China's face and tell them to @!$%# off.

                                            Sounds legit to me.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#24 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:03 PM EDT

                                            You are a private landowner, if you sold to a Cuban national, can you wave your receipt at the US government and tell them to *(&(& offf???

                                            sounds stupid to me

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #24.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:25 PM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            The Chinese don't want anyone else to hold any advantage in the way of resources. This is why China has been purchasing energy rights in many undeveloped/developed nations in Africa, South America, Central American, Mexico, USA, Canada. They just don't want their arch enemy Japan to have a resource advantage. China is so rich in its own resources. Yet it needs to own the worlds too. Well this is what happens when a nation the size of China decides to move into the 21st century. I bet those Communist Chinese haven't forgot the Imperial Wars of Japan against their homeland. I guess China did not want to pay enough for the isles or they figured they would bully their way into their hands.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            Reply#25 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:03 PM EDT

                                            If the Chinese had a chance at the deal they would have messed it up with a goofy lowball offer.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #25.1 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:05 PM EDT

                                            The Chinese haven't played their "American Treasury Bond" card yet.....if they did, our nation would be in deep **** and go into a depression

                                            Obama is still spending........... $16,000,000,000,000 debt a ticking time bomb LOL
                                            keep voting for Obama and his nonstop

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #25.2 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:29 PM EDT

                                            His non-stop what? This article isn't about Obama or Romney anyway. Good for the Japanese!

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #25.3 - Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:44 PM EDT

                                            Let's stop all spending and watch the rest of the country fall apart...no road maintenance, no police, fire dept. no teachers...when the wealthy folks quality of life starts to suffer losing their BMW's in potholes the size of semis and falling through crumbling bridges i bet the taxes go up, but i also bet that they don't go up on the wealthy.

                                              #25.4 - Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:36 AM EDT
                                              Reply
                                              Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5
                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.