Three US soldiers among at least 14 killed by Afghan suicide bomber

A suicide bomber detonated a device in Afghanistan on Monday, killing three U.S. soldiers, one interpreter and four members of the Afghan National Police, a military official told NBC News.

The U.S. soldiers and Afghan police were on a dismounted partner patrol near the center of the Khost region in eastern Afghanistan. The attacker approached and detonated as they were preparing to get back in their vehicles.

Six civilians also died in the attack, Reuters reported. 

Despite reports that the bomber was riding a motorcycle, the official said there was no evidence of that. The official added that the dead interpreter is thought to be Afghan.

More Afghanistan coverage from NBC News

On Saturday night, an Afghan soldier approached Americans, killing a soldier and a contractor; with that, the number of soldiers killed in Afghanistan is around 2,100 in the United States' 11-year-war in the country. Insider attacks have become increasingly common – and no one seems to have a good answer about how to stop them. NBC's Lester Holt and Richard Engel report from Kabul.

A witness told Reuters a suicide bomber was wearing a police uniform.

The bombing followed the killing of two Americans on Sunday in an exchange of fire with Afghan forces.

Insider attacks by members of the Afghan security forces against NATO allies have resulted in at least 52 deaths this year among foreign forces and this month prompted a tightening of rules for joint patrols between coalition and Afghan forces. 

NBC's Richard Engel examines America's progress after fighting for more than a decade in Afghanistan. Is there any evidence that the American plan to hand over a credible, stable Afghan government will work?

Reuters contributed to this report.

More world stories from NBC News:

Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook


 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 3 4 5

To hell with them, we have more than enough problems at home to worry about, and if a few Afghanis freeze to death this winter too bad.

When our own house is set back in order then we can once again be charitable but until then keep the money at home.

    Reply#109 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 3:05 PM EDT

    My son spent a year on FOB Curry and FOB Orgun E. He got back last year and is on re-deployment standby at this time (so much for Obama bringing them all home - its BS). I asked my son when he was over there, how did he like working the Afghan troops? He told me that his unit had their sleeping quarters separate from the Afghans and they always had 1 troop on guard at night with the weapon pointed towards the Afghan section. thats how much they trusted them.

      Reply#110 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 9:33 PM EDT
      Jay BelowDeleted

      Maybe the attacker was pissed about that new Status of Forces agreement, that says we are staying in Afghanistan for another 10 years. Anyway, those dopey soldiers have had 10 years to figure out that the war is bogus and they don't belong there. Better they be removed from the gene pool. At least they aren't going to wind up on some local police dept!

        Reply#112 - Wed Oct 3, 2012 1:05 AM EDT
        Jay BelowDeleted
        Reply

        What I think some folks are misunderstanding is where we are losing against Islamic radicals, is they are not linked to a specific country (though they receive shelter and support from very specific countries), but to an ideology, an religion. To win, the opponent has to believe they have lost. If the opponent is a strident religious fanatic whose ultimate goal is to either convert all the infidels or die trying. To win this war, we have to make Islamic radicals believe they have suffered more than they can stand. Our problem is we are constrained by our own ethic. During World War Two we had no problem bombing 80,000 Japanese to death in little over five minutes, but now we cringe if we kill a handful of villagers. We need our ethics. But we need to survive too. A Supreme Court Justice wrote a book with the title "All the Laws But One", in which he points out that Abraham Lincoln had to violate the Constitution to save the Constitution. We may have to tolerate a shift in our ethic to save our ethics.

        We are losing the war against Islamic radicals, we're killing the leaders by the truckload, but they bounce back and kill our Ambassador. Every American who gets on an airplane has to go through a search that has changed the way we live our lives. We're still doing this eleven years after the war started. We're still fighting these people eleven years later, instead of exerting the full force we're capable of. It's as if it is better to allow Americans to suffer so as not to offend some-body's sense of decency, then it is to make the enemy suffer. There's an old saying in surgery that goes "the surgery was a success, but the patient died", meaning the singular procedure worked, but the larger forces of disease won. We're at risk of having a successful procedure, but losing the patient.

          Reply#113 - Wed Oct 3, 2012 9:50 PM EDT
          Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 3 4 5
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.