Members of Congress as well as the former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's campaign are raising new issues about the Benghazi attack and how it was reported to the public. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.
Correction: An earlier version of this post had an incorrect date for the cable sent to the State Department by U.S. Embassy personnel in Libya.
House Republicans stepped up criticism of President Barack Obama on Friday over the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S mission in Benghazi, Libya, releasing 166 pages of unclassified documents and photos that they said show administration officials repeatedly rejected “requests for increased security despite escalating violence … (and) systematically decreased existing security to dangerous and ineffective levels.”
The release of the documents, which came just days before Obama and Republican Mitt Romney discuss U.S. foreign policy in their last debate before the Nov. 6 presidential election, added to the political furor over the administration’s actions preceding the late-night attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, which claimed the life of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
Many of the documents released by House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa and National Security Subcommittee Chairman Jason Chaffetz had previously been made public, but others provided new evidence of growing concern about the security situation in Benghazi, and Libya in general.
One, a June 25 memo from Stevens, referred to incidents in Benghazi in which local elements attacked foreigners and specifically mentioned signs of growing al-Qaida sympathies in the city.
“(A) national security official shared his private opinion that the attacks were the work of extremists who are opposed to western influence in Libya,” Stevens wrote. “A number of local contacts agreed, noting that Islamic extremism appears to be on the rise in eastern Libya and the al-Qaida flag has been spotted several times flying over government buildings and training facilities in Derna (a city east of Benghazi). Other contacts disagree however suggesting that the attacks could be the work of pro-Gadhafi loyalists or individuals who have been politically and financially marginalized by the (Transitional National Council)."
Another document, a cable dated Aug. 2 and sent to the State Department by U.S. Embassy personnel in Tripoli, indicated that staff had growing concerns over security provided by Libyan militias.
“Host nation security support is lacking and cannot be depended on to provide a safe and secure environment for the diplomatic mission,” it said in part.
Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter
In a letter to Obama, Issa, R-Calif., and Chaffetz, R-Utah, demanded the president fully answer questions about the administration’s response to the concerns.
"The American people deserve nothing less than a full explanation from this administration about these events, including why the repeated warnings about a worsening security situation appear to have been ignored by this administration,” it said. “Americans also deserve a complete explanation about your administration's decision to accelerate a normalized presence in Libya at what now appears to be at the cost of endangering American lives.”
The senior Democrat on the committee, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, D-Md., issued a statement in which he accused Issa and Chaffetz of attempting to use the tragedy to score political points.
Issa's letter "completely ignores sworn testimony provided to the committee, recklessly omits contradictory information from the very same documents it quotes, irresponsibly promotes inaccurate information, and makes numerous allegations with no evidence to substantiate them," he wrote.

Ben Curtis / AP file
U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans died in the attack on the U.S. consulate Benghazi, LIbya.
Separately, a senior U.S. intelligence official, who spoke with NBC News on condition of anonymity, said Friday that investigators still have not uncovered any evidence that the attack was preplanned.
"No one is ruling out the idea that some of the attackers may have aspired to attack the U.S. in Benghazi," the official said. "However, right now, there isn't any intelligence that the attackers preplanned their assault days or weeks in advance. The bulk of available information supports the early assessment that the attackers launched their assault opportunistically after they learned about the violence at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo. Of course, other factors may also have motivated participation in the attack."
Watch World News videos on NBCNews.com
State Department spokesman Mark Toner also cautioned that investigators are still piecing together events that led to the attack.
"An independent board is conducting a thorough review of the assault on our post in Benghazi,” he said. “Once we have the board's comprehensive account of what happened, findings and recommendations, we can fully address these matters."
The release of the documents came after the top Republican and Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee said they would continue to press the administration to explain why U.S. spy agencies and government spokesmen initially played down suspected al-Qaida links to the consulate attack.
More to Benghazi attacks than surface at debate
Immediately after the Benghazi attack, U.S. spy agencies produced conflicting reports on who was behind them, U.S. officials said. Most said extremists with possible al-Qaida ties were involved. But a few reports, which the Obama administration emphasized in public statements, said the attacks could have been spontaneous protests against a U.S.-made anti-Muslim video.
Ultimately, the office of the Director of National Intelligence, the top U.S. intelligence authority, declared that the events were a "deliberate and organized terrorist attack" carried out by "extremists" affiliated with or sympathetic to al-Qaida.
Several prominent Republicans are accusing the White House of either covering up, or bungling initial reports about the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya. Former Defense Secretary William Cohen joins Andrea Mitchell Reports to discuss the investigation.
On Thursday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said both intelligence and security problems may have played a role in the attack.
"There's no question but that it was a terrorist attack, there is no question but that the security was inadequate and I think that there is no question that we need to work on our intelligence," Feinstein told KCBS-TV.
Clinton refuses to assign blame for Benghazi attacks
When asked why the U.S. government initially played down the role of Islamic militants, she said: "I think what happened was the director of intelligence, who is a very good individual, put out some speaking points on the initial intelligence assessment. I think that was possibly a mistake."
But the committee's Republican vice chairman, Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, questioned whether administration officials deliberately omitted possible references to al-Qaida involvement in talking points about the Benghazi attacks.
"Talking points distributed by the administration are nearly identical to intelligence assessments within hours of the attack, except in one important way: the intelligence judgment that the attackers had ties to al-Qaida was excluded from the public points," Chambliss said in a statement on Friday.
"The administration omitted the known links to al-Qaida at almost every opportunity ... Whether this was an intentional effort by the administration to downplay the role of terrorist groups, especially al-Qaida, is one of the many issues the Senate Intelligence Committee must examine," he said.
NBC News Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Andrea Mitchell and NBC News producers Catherine Chomiak, Rich Gardella and Libby Leist and Reuters news service contributed to this report.
More world stories from NBC News:
- Self-professed Sept. 11 mastermind Mohammed airs his views at Gitmo hearing
- British government to recruit teens as next generation of spies
- Doctors: Girl shot by Taliban able to stand, communicate
- U.S. nonprofit 'names and shames' businesses to put bite into Iran sanctions
- Van full of bodies stolen during drivers' break in Germany
- Revolt of the underclass in Syria
- Fidel Castro statement read at Havana event amid rumors about his health
- Rights group blasts Rwanda winning seat on UN Security Council
- 'Spy of the West': Al-Qaida, Taliban struggle to justify attack on Pakistani teen
- UK computer hacker wins 10 year fight against extradition to US
Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook


Time for Impeachment hearings. No reason to lie to the American people about a video being the reason for the death of Ambassador. This is a bigger cover up than Watergate
Gongratulations, Mrs. Clinton......You have just been thrown under the ObamaWagon.
When Mr. Obama DOES NOT NEED the services of anyone amymore, he litters the streets.....Oprah, Rev. Wright, and the Kennedy family ring a bell ?
Standby Bollywood, you will be next as soon as the "movie" on Osama bin Laden's raid featuring Mr. Obama hits the media. ME riots will occur, Americans will be killed overseas, and the blame will then shift.
Typical.
Republicans shamelessly trying to politicize this for obvious reasons: It's an election year.
Clearly Republicans' motivation is to find a way to deflect from the fact that President Obama got the No. 1 Terrorist in the World, Osama Bin Laden, and it deflects from the fact that Mitt Romney has the potential of being a felon for lying on his tax returns.
Republicans have gotten to the point where you can't trust a word they say because there's always some kind of personal motivation involved. Republicans are never "neutral", they're always "radical".
Obama/Biden 2012
Issa's an opportunistic A-hole. Republicans are just trying to cover for Romney's poor debate performance.
Republicans are trying to save your liberal asses.
You do not seem to be able to do it yourselves.
Obama drops the ball again, if he was a running back he would only warm the bench, just like he did when in congress (he hardly even showed up).
It would be a bad time to throw Hillary under the bus, since Bill has been campaigning for Obama. Looks like Obama's stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Bush dropped the ball on Bin Laden, and Obama had to pick it up and get the job done for him.
Romney would drop the ball more, given his ever changing positions on everything.
yes that its..it has to be because it is an election year...god forbid we ask the truth the first 3 years of his presidency.......
you want to be the big cheese and cant handle a few questions due to the heat then time to get out of the kitchen
Typical.
Democrats including you would have been all over anybody in the Republican party if this had happened to them. You know like you were with the lack of bullet proof vests during the earlier stages of the Iraq War. I suspect you were amoung the sheep yelling bloody murder. Also, the reason is was hidden was because it is an election year. So the dems are exactly the same.
Go to politifact and check for yourself, Romney lies more than Obama.
TO: Viewer_Ready who wrote:
Please don't "save" us like Republicans did last time: Robbing us blind and then crashing our economy.
We don't need Republicans to "save" us like Mitch McConnell and Eric Cantor have for the last 4 years either: By stalling our recovery and refusing to pass Jobs bills.
Sure Republicans are trying to save us [sarc], just like Republicans throwing someone a life line, and finding out it isnt' tied to tree, we're on our own and if it was up to Republicans at least 47% of the American People would starve, including children, seniors, and our retired military personnel.
Obama/Biden 2012
"The global enthusiasm for US President Barack Obama has fallen "significantly" since he took office in 2009, but in many countries there is still strong support for his re-election in November, according to a poll released Wednesday by the US Pew Research Centre.
Confidence in Obama fell from 86 per cent in 2009 to 80 per cent in Europe, and from 85 to 74 per cent in Japan, the two regions where the US president is most popular.
But despite disappointment with some of his policies, such as growing opposition to the drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere, there is still support for him to stay in office another four years in some places in the world.
His re-election was favoured by large majorities in France (92 per cent); Germany (89 per cent); Britain (73 per cent); Spain (71 per cent); Italy (69 per cent); the Czech Republic (67 per cent); Brazil (72 per cent) and Japan (66 per cent)."
Read more: http://india.nydailynews.com/newsarticle/66b5bd50a6621f4257df73a7d79559de/obama-s-global-approval-rating-falls-but-world-wants-re-election#ixzz29n6Ppegx
so eric you admit that obama lies? and for the record i fully believe all politicians lie, both of those cats have told some zingers
TO: GCCal who wrote:
There you go again. Everytime Republicans F-up, they never hesitate to try to blame Democrats.
Sorry, but Democrats are nowhere near as cynical or lousy as some black hearted Republicans.
Obama/Biden 2012
You forgot to add that nobody died because of watergate. Here they did and Obama is still lying! Anybody that thinks this is political has got to be stupid. PEOPLE DIED! And the Obama people have been trying to cover their asses since!
OH yes Glen - exactly right! Impeachment hearings . . . . for BUSH - bring it on!!
OH. WAIT. Bush has already left office . . . hmmmm . . . guess it will have to be War Crimes Trials for the 3,000+ killed at the WTC on Bush & Cheney's watch; and the nearly 7,000 killed in the 2 unnecessary wars in Iraq & Afghanistan that Bush & his admin got us into over non-existent WMD . . . and the ~132,000 Iraqi civilians killed, also because of the same lie . . .
But for sure, once we get that taken care of, we can talk about impeachment hearings . . .
Meanwhile,
O & Joe - 4 more years!
The Democrats do not want to talk about who is to blame because it is Obama and Clinton who are to blame. There were repeated requests for increased security in Libya by the Ambassador and his security team. These requests fell on deaf ears in the administration. Obama had caved in to the Libyans when they did not want to have a Marine detachment or private security contractors protecting the embassy and consulate. Obama allowed himself to be dictated to by some third world leader into using only local security people, many of whom were not even allowed to be armed and who certainly had no loyalty. This was borne out in the fact that several of the security personnel were complicit in the attack on the consulate. The fault for this tragedy lies squarely on Clinton's and Obama's shoulders, that is why they do not want to talk about who is to blame. On top of that, in an attempt to hide their failure and cover up what really happened, they tried to sell a story that the attack was spontaneous as a result of that stupid internet video. They knew full well that it was a planned terrorist attack because they already had intelligence indicating it was coming. They did not want this to be known because it makes them look even worse for denying the requests for added security. Clinton and Obama had warning that something was coming in Libya yet did nothing to guard against it and denied those on the ground when they requests help. If they were the head of a civilian security company instead of politicians some DA would have already charged them with depraved indifference murder in the deaths of the four American because they knew of the danger and did nothing to mitigate it.
That's funny Fred, why did Ryan vote against more money for security?
The blood of these Americans are on Obama and his Administrations hands! Their inaction cost these four their lives. And what they had to endure because of this inept pathetic excuse of a President and Administration is unforgivable! He should be impeached at the least. Actually, I think it is treason as he did not protect our Americans when they clearly asked for help.
I hope the Disgrace-in-Chief thinks it was worth it to lie to the American people! It is going to help cost him the election.
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 AND 2016!!!!
It is Hillarity who should be impeached, and right bloody NOW. The Clinton clan blackmailed Obama into giving her the top job and she has made a mess of it using it only as a photo op for her fat azz. Obama's first pick would have been Colin Powell and I cannot see anything like the Benghazi let-down occurring on his watch.
None of you conspiracy theorists know sheet.
Listen to what the locals were telling them at the embassy:
“A number of local contacts agreed, noting that Islamic extremism appears to be on the rise in eastern Libya and the al-Qaida flag has been spotted several times flying over government buildings and training facilities in Derna (a city east of Benghazi). Other contacts disagree however suggesting that the attacks could be the work of pro-Gadhafi loyalists or individuals who have been politically and financially marginalized by the (Transitional National Council)."
Mixed signals. Agree/disagree. All signs still point to some opportunistic tribal gangs that heard about Egypt and decided to demonstrate/attack.
Ryan voted against funding security measures. He voted for cuts. That's what he does. This is what happens.
Romney/Ryan are still not above using the victims for political gain. One of the mothers of the dead had to come forth and protest Romney's BS story about meeting one of the former SEALs.
This is my last word on the subject, because reading Wrongme supporters jumping on the pile to profit politically from fellow American's deaths sickens me. I won't read any more of your opportunistic crap. You are as bad as the attackers.
The Bush family killed more Americans..give it a break...
Feels like a perfect storm for the end of O. Candy Crowley can't even collaborate with him this time.
The truth always floats to the top, just like cream.
Eric:
France loves O because they don't want to be the only sinking ship with the "tax the rich" plan.
Obama is innocent! He knew nothing of what was going down. How could he, he wasn't there. JUST the EMPTY CHAIR. He has to get re-elected, why would he give a crap about National Security. His Arab brothers don't like him either.
NObama 2012!
@ Boromir:
We aren't at war with Libya! There is a bit of difference between being a soldier in combat (your job) and being an Ambassador who should be protected. Do you not understand the difference?
And if you want to compare war deaths - Obama has his share now too!
And I can guarantee that Bush would never have flown off to Vegas to hob-nob with his partying buddies the day after his Ambassador was murdered! Bush may not have been perfect - but he was a good and decent man - unlike the current Disgrace-in-Chief who only cares about partying in the White House another 4 years, playing round after round of golf and sending the wife to Spain with her "girlfriends" to shop 'till they drop on the taxpayer dole.
What a bunch of conspiracy crap coming from the rwnjobs! Their claims that all this was known ahead of time by Obama is as bad as claiming that Bush and Osama's family, along with certain rich Jews, were all in charge of 9/11! Yes, this is a tragic event and could have been more efficiently prevented, there are always lots of if's and but's in retrospect, along with the should's, when tragedies and losses occur. However, this is an American problem, NOT A PARTISAN ISSUE, as they said in the last debate, and there you all go with the big Ryan doe-eyes photos, accusing and blaming again and again as if you are the big experts who know it all when you should be aware with any brains that some things are still classified for our security in the here and now, and that this is an ongoing investigation. Furthermore, it is Congress, primarily the REPUBLICAN RULED House, that funds more security so you should be blaming your own Republicans who voted down further funding.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html
There are wins and losses in every war. It was your own Bush who told you this was not going to be any normal war in the traditional sense, but a diffuse situation of terrorists all over this world. You really know how to shoot yourselves in the feet by opening your ignorant mouths when all of us out here already see what you are up to and that is politicizing in the extreme and turning into a witch hunt, a national security issue.
Shame on your sorry, stupid, busted, little selfish, repugnant selves!!! All the more reason to laugh at this sorry attempt to win votes and scandalize the other party in a defense issue which is a smear campaign and misinformed propaganda... at the risk of interfering with the real ongoing defense of the American People. Thinking and informed adults need to vote back in those Democrats who have been doing the job and actually know what they are doing simply because it is they who have already achieved successful results for the whole of America, not sit on the sidelines or cheating behind the curtains to continue adding to the ruination of the reputation of a fair and ethical America before the international community, for the privileged few exploitative off-shoring expats of America.
It is bad enough that those people had to die, and their families have asked your members of the Republican Party kindly to shut up and stop politicising this, but here it is again. Biden clearly told you in his debate with Ryan what the administration knew that day. You may be in the employ of, have, or are hoping to get all the wealth, but it seems those who have insisted on continuing this have such bad manners that it is apparent they do not have any class...did your Mommies not teach you proper etiquette? It seems she did not teach you about ethics or fairness, or how to be factual either.
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
Anonymous Insight:
With being part of a democracy we don't "have to take" lies as leadership. I wouldn't stay married to a person like this, let alone want someone of O's integrity running the greatest nation in the world.
I actually think this mother, mentioned O and friends...not Romney
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/10/video-mother-of-state-dept-worker-killed-in-benghazi-begs-white-house-to-stop-stonewalling-her/
You have to love this mock outrage from the republicans. Ryan voted to cut the budget for embassy security, but he is so outraged about security.
Issac is nothing but an ambulance chaser who tries to use any dead American to create fake scandals to attack this administration. He failed with the baseless attacks against Holder, so he is giving it another try by using the Ambassador Steven's death to help Romney score points on foreign policy.
Romney's first trigger happy statement was wrong and a sad disgusting attempt to score some political points. He was even criticized by Republicans. Now, he is trying to do a rewrite but wants us to ignore his own stupidity. This is disgusting and pathetic.
Hmmmm, less than 200 comments.
HEY LIBBIES!
Where are the thousands of nonsense comments that you usually pollute these boards with your irrational support of Barrack Hussein, Joe "Bite Me" Biden and Hilarious Clinton in this huge cluster f**k?
Where are all the cutesy little talking points about Republicans, Conservatives and, of course your favorite bogeyman, the TEA Party. Why aren't you blaming all of this on Bush, Big Bird and "Binders"?
If ANYTHING like this would have happened during the Bush administration there would be headlines on top of headlines. But of course because its Barrack Hussein, and more of his failed policies are being exposed, nothing is being said.
This has all the underpinnings of Watergate.
Except no one died in Watergate.
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 FOR REAL AMERICANS©
Eric-913730
Go to politifact and check for yourself, Romney lies more than Obama.
so this what passes for presidential? he lies slightly less?
sad state of affairs
Without disclosing Classified (information withheld from US Public):
Life during President Gaddaffi, contract with Libyan Citizens in his "Green Book": Loans to Libyan citizens were given with "NO interest". Students would get paid the average salary for the profession they are studying for. If you’d be unable to get the employment the state would pay the full salary as if you were employed. When you got married the couple got an apartment or house for free. You could go to college anywhere in the world, the state paid 2,500 euros plus for accommodation and a car. The cars were sold at factory cost. Libya does not owe money, (not a cent) to anyone, No credits. Free education and health care. 25% of population with a university degree. No beggars on the streets and no homeless. Bread costs $0.15. Gasoline $0.33 per liter, during the attacks $0.66 per liter. All this disappeared after the Overthrow of President Gaddaffi.
President Gaddaffi and Libya as a US Ally, to get the President Bush US and UN Sanctions and Embargoes lifted so he would ship Libyan Oil to the US European Allies: Collaborated with the CIA. President Gaddaffi had his Libyan Military hunting the Islamic Jihadists at Libya. Stopped his pursuit of Nuclear Power. Turned over his Chemical Weapons to the US. Transfer of US Islamic Jihadists Prisoners from Guantanamo to President Gaddaffi's Prisons (including later President Obama's). Human Rights and Libyan Citizen's Rights as praised by the UN and UA (African Union).
The Fundamentalist Islamic Arab League of Nations demanded President Gaddaffi's Death for Collaborating with the Christians, Jews, Unbelievers, a Death Penalty Fatawa is issued.
Most of the work that the Libyan Citizens do not want to do are done by Foreigners brought into Libya, and have no Libyan Citizens Rights nor the Libyan Citizens Entitlements listed in President Gaddaffi's Green Book.
The Holy Warriors of Islam (aka Islamic Jihadists) are gathering at Libya, after the Overthrow of US Ally Egypt. Many Intelligence Agencies are stating that these Islamic Jihadists are the Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada Saudi Arabia (AQ), Al Quada Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Al Quada Syria (AQS), Al Quada Yemen (AQY), Hezbollah, Al Quada Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), etc. as trained by the Quds Special Forces of the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran at the Fundamentalist Islamic Autonomous Kurdistanis Region of Northern Iraq, Syria, Southern Turkey, and Northwestern Iran to Overthrow the Established Governments of US Allies.
President Gaddaffi warns everyone about the Fundamentalist Islamic Jihadists gathering at Libya, President Gaddaffi's Military starts to fight them. President Obama ignores this just like he ignored US Ally Iraq, US Ally Egypt, US Ally Saudi Arabia, US Ally Turkey, US Ally Pakistan, President of Syria, etc. until it was too late.
President Gaddaffi f**ks up, declares Libyan Oil Nationalization. Due to President Obama's Policies the US and US Allies have lost the Iraqis Oil, this makes the Libyan Oil of Strategic Importance to the US European Allies.
Why Benghazi: Thousands of Islamic Jihadists flood into Benghazi with the Asymmetric Warfare intent of killing the Libyan Military Guards, seizing the weapons, ammunition at the the 60 bunker Hight Razma facility on the eastern outskirts of Benghazi and a 35 bunker facility on the eastern outskirts of Ajdabiyah." The term "bunkers" is a misnomer as some of these "bunkers" were the size of warehouses. After the Libyan Military Guards were massacred at these Libyan Munitions Depots, the Facilities were left unguarded. This is how about 20,000 shoulder launched portable SA-7 anti aircraft missiles ended up "missing"; believed to be currently in the hands of Al Quada and the rest of the Islamic Terrorists (Jihadist, Worldwide Islamic Military), possible use shoot down US and US Ally Commercial Airlines (Aircraft) worldwide (after all the other publicly known failed attempts); most US Military and US Ally Military Aircraft have detection and countermeasures (some are still shot down by SA-7s, mistaken for RPGs (similar warhead). ). Then inciting the Foreign Workers brought into Libya to demand Libyan Citizens Rights and Entitlements.
President Gaddaffi sends his Libyan Military to fight the Islamic Jihadists and Foreign Worker Protesters and Demonstrators gone violent (murdered Libyan Military).
President Obama then claims that President Gaddaffi is a "Dictator Killing his own people" (not Gaddaffi's own Libyan Citizens but Islamic Jihadists).
President Gaddaffi orders the Foreign Workers to leave his Country, most do not and actively join the Islamic Jihad to Overthrow President Gaddaffi the Collaborator to the Christians, Jews, Unbelievers; again the Fundamentalist Islamic Arab League of Nations demands the Overthrow of President Gaddaffi.
The Libyan Oil after President Obama's Policies caused the Loss of the Iraqis Oil:
During the "G" Meeting at France, that was attended by SOS Clinton, the European Oil Corporations Lobby the European Politicians to Overthrow President Gaddaffi to stop his Libyan Oil Nationalization (majority of Profits remain in Libya).
These European Oil Corporations demand President Gaddaffi's Overthrow to stop his Libyan Oil Nationalization: BP (Britain), Total, Elf (France), Eni (Italy), OMV (Austria), Statoil (Norway), etc.. So instead of these European Oil Corporations hiring cheap Libyan Labor then keeping all the Profits, with Gaddaffi's Resource Nationalization, they would get almost nothing and the majority of the profits would remain in Libya. So in anticipation of their Governments Military Actions to Overthrow Gaddaffi to stop his Resource Nationalization, "Non essential" personnel were evacuated February 21, 2011.
US Army Special Forces LTC Woods and his Specialized Support Teams are at Libya since February. It is Routine to attach US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces to the CIA's SAD/SOG to conduct Targeting and Target Damage Assessments to minimize Civilian Casualties during Airstrikes and Cruise Missile Attacks. The US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces Missions are routinely Special Reconnaissance, Special Surveillance, Foreign Internal Defense, Insurgency (training the locals to Overthrow a Established Government), Counter Insurgency (stop others from Overthrowing a US Ally's Established Government), etc..
President Obama as Commander In Chief Orders the US Military to attack Libya in violation of the US Law that Restricts or Limits the Presidential War Powers, US Law, 1973 War Powers Resolution (Act). President Obama failed to notify both Houses of US Congress 48 hours prior to ANY US Military Actions. US Congress does not have time to write a US Law with US Congressional Appropriations, like they did for President Clinton (42) and President Bush (43). President Obama uses not previously Budgeted for Discretionary Spending including to fund NATO's Bombs, Fuel, Cruise Missiles, etc.. Afterwards on behalf of President Obama SOS Clinton apologizes to US Congress, "I'm sorry".
The Results: President Gaddaffi is murdered. Most of the Libyan Citizens that benefited as President Gaddaffi Supporters flee Libya (See Life During President Gaddaffi above). The Islamic Jihadists get another Islamic Nation. Mediterranean Ports closer to attack the US European Allies aka Crusaders. US European Allies lose the Libyan Oil to the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran's Ally, the Chinese. 20,000 portable shoulder launched anti aircraft SA-7 missiles end up in the hands of the Islamic Jihadists with their stated goal of shooting down US Civilian Airlines "to cripple the US Economy". Strategic Location for the Islamic Jihadists to get the other African Nations, just like Egypt was key to get Libya.
The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were those Islamic Jihadist Foreign Fighters that were killing US Military at Iraq, they become the Government of Libya.
Ansar Al Sharia is formed from the Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada Saudi Arabia (AQ), Al Quada Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Al Quada Syria (AQS), Al Quada Yemen (AQY), Hezbollah, Al Quada Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), to protect and instate Fundamentalist Islamic Shia (Sharia) Law as the Rule of Law for the Islamic Nation of Libya.
US Army Special Forces LTC Woods creates a Report pertaining to the Security of the US Diplomatic Mission at Libya. Depending on who he and his US Army Special Forces Specialized Support Teams are attached or assigned to this goes thru many distinct Reporting Channels, usually directly to the Top (President of the US). The First being as assigned to the President's Executive Intelligence Agency, the CIA, included in the Daily Presidential Intelligence Report; Second, the US Department of State, US Ambassador gets copy, SOS Clinton gets copy, then the US President. Third, copy to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, US Secretary of Defense, then to US President. US Ambassador is a Presidential Appointee, with Direct Access to the US President.
Ask yourselves this question, what was so important that that US Ambassador Stevens left the safety of the US Embassy at Tripoli to go to the US Consulate at Benghazi. As most of the personnel had already left and were at the Airport.
From the Article:
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California DON'T EVEN ATTEMPT THE BLAME GAME AGAINST OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, ODNI, IT IS THE WHITEHOUSE THAT WRITES THE "SPEAKING POINTS".
LAME JUST LIKE Boromir, Starderup, Eric-913730, KJNC, American Girl-724855,
That are WORSE than Islamic Jihadists and will defend President Obama Wrong or Right to Their Deaths.
SOS Clinton, "Funding was not an issue".
Iraq: 2003 Operation Iraqis Freedom from President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655, "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" Justification Section 2 Weapons of Mass Destruction, Section 3 US Policy Overthrow President Hussein.
9/11 2001 Attacks. October 2001 US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces attached to CIA's SAD/SOG go into Afghanistan to Overthrow the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government for providing Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada with Islamic Sanctuary and support to plan, conduct the 9/11 2001 Attacks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arxKhJIjIiY
2001 Operation Viking Hammer, the elimination of the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban, Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada, Islamic Jihadists that escaped from Afghanistan on the Old Silk Road to Northern Iraq and renamed themselves Ansar Al Islam.
2002 Operation Hotel Calfornia Attacking, Seizing, Securing of the Iraqis Chemical Weapons Facility at Sargat Iraq.
President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies that left the US Blind and Deaf to the Events leading up to the 9/11 2001 Attacks, Cut to the Bone Reduction In Forces of the US Military that would normally independently verify Intelligence Agency Information becoming Actionable Intelligence. US must rely on information (not even intelligence) from Potentially Hostile Nations like Jordan, Pakistan, etc. that have their own Agendas. US Allies refuse the US access to their Intelligence Assets for fear of compromise.
US Congressional 9/11 Commission (Committee) Investigations, Findings and Recommendations, with former President Clinton, "I'm a so sorry".
Boromir, Starderup, Eric-913730, KJNC, American Girl-724855, how does President Obama's rear end smell.
Anonymous Insight
I will tell you straight up, I did not read your whole post... I got as far as blaming the Republicans for the budget cuts...
How can you answer this... 144 Rep and 149, That is One Hundred and Fourty Nine Democrats voted for the same bill.
From the content, looks like the only ones lying are the republicans. Course they love lying. Baseless assumptions, are, to a republican, like a discarded hamburger to a hound. These are contemptible sons-a-bitches, using the death of 4 good Americans in the hope of political gain.
Mac,
"The lie" was for political gain.
You have to have had a lobotomy or be lying through your teeth to think that an attack on the anniversary of 9/11 was just a "spontaneous" protest of a video that no one's seen. For the idiots claiming that trying to find out the truth about this amounts to politics, please tell everyone with a straight face that if this had happened under Bush that you would be defending him and his administration if they had acted the same way. The fact is that the cover up here makes Watergate looks like child's play. At least with Watergate it was just a two-bit burglary that didn't affect anything. Here, an Ambassador and three others are dead and the administration still refuses to provide answers. Logically, just the fact that Obama and his minions think that hiring private Muslim extremists to guard our Ambassador after overthrowing the Libyan government automatically is an impeachable offense (being stupid), but to actually put that into action and causing the death of the Ambassador and three others is criminal.
Boromir
Hmmmm, do you really want to go there?
If you do we can always bring up your boy-toys Kennedy and LBJ's wonderful job in Vietnam.
Vietnam cost us 58,209 lives and over 211,000 wounded. I won't even start with the massive cost it was to our nation.
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 FOR REAL AMERICANS©
Speaking of dropping balls, Obummer has cerainly dropped his because Hillary is now using them. She has to be since she is willing to "man up" and admit a lapse of leadership. Despite her acceptance of responsibility her boss, Obummer, is ultimately responsible - as is any boss.
Obama sent 50 Marines to Libya today to staff our consulate there. It's a shame it took the death of our Ambassador and three of his staff members to make that happen.
Why isn't the press asking Obama about this? Oh I forgot, they're still obsessed with the timing of Romney's criticism. Yeah, that's a bigger issue.
UPDATE: Just to make the point a little finer, Levin wonders why Obama didn't "beef up" the staffing at our embassies around the world simply because it was the anniversary of 9/11. He wants the press to ask Obama about that.
http://www.therightscoop.com/politico-ambassador-stevens-killed-at-consulate-with-no-marines-protecting-it/
This is a crime in itself. YET he has time for his childlike name calling. The buck stops with him. He failed at yet another task he was responsible for. The effect of this failure costs lives.
Starderup
And who signed it?
BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!
The buck stops here Spanky.
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 FOR REAL AMERICANS©
The intelligence community are not yet prepared to say how the attack actually bloomed. If Intelligence doesn't know, how the hell could the likes of "Issa the Criminal" and/or "Chambliss the Rat" know? Listening to these two is like accepting a rats version of the proper construction of a "rat trap".
@Independent thought#1.35: Don't believe your assumption for a minute. I do believe people such as yourself hope to use this tragedy as political fodder, and nothing could be sorrier or more despicable. It's always the republican way. A thing doesn't have legs, the republicans will give it the illusion of walking. Recent history, in fact all republican history, is strewn with such ugly debris. The rest of us are getting damned tired of the raw, stinking, republican bullsh^t.
Mac,
While your vocabulary is rich, your justification is poor. The truth is the truth.
O: Why lie? Why apologize?
Ha,ha,ha,ha,umm, ah, There was no video. The Egyptians simply and collectively dreamed It. Not only that, but they did so some 12 hours before the Benghazi attack. The Ambassador was at a remote Consulate there, not at the Embassy in Tripoli. The Libyans had warned us not to be sending in Armed Contractors to guard our Diplomats. The Congress had voted against any increase in funding of security for Diplomatic personnel. The President did in fact say, Terrorist attacks on our foreign personnel would not be tolerated. The attack is yet being investigated by American intelligence officials. There is an election near. The Presidents opponent appears quite weak. Republicans aren't trying with all their armament of bullsh^t to build this tragedy into a crusty pile, strong enough for the limp Romney to walk upon. Waaa,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. I ain't buying your bullsh^t, and no one else with enough cognizance to understand the difference between noon and midnight will either. Republicans don't give a sorry quipped damn about the death of these 4 good people. They do though, wish to win the election, and will do whatever they can, at whatever cost, toward that end.
Now you sound like looney, over-emotional, loose lips Biden.
Really? Don't care about four lost lives? I am thoroughly sickened for those families, as I too have had to lay a child to rest. No mother should ever have to experience the depths of that sadness. I can almost guarantee, you have never kissed a coffin, being lowered into the dirt, filled with one of your children.
There is absolutely no-one that believes behavior or comments when filled with giggles and profanity.
THEY LIED AND CHRIS DIED!!! Bin Laden is dead and al qaida is ALIVE!
Refresh my memory, when Bush was pressed by the REAL AMERICANS for facts and details of his administrations treasonous covert shenanigan's, how many times did he, Cheney, and Rumsfeld thumb their noses at the REAL AMERICANS citing "executive privileges"? Yeah... I kinda figured you all conveniently forgot too!
So, the lies are coming out of the administration, the lies that were promoted for two entire weeks after the Benghazi attacks and the Obama supporters, as usual, want to pretend that Obama isn't responsible. So, who is in charge in the White House? If the Obamabots are so eager to defend him, why do they use such pitiful excuses? Oh, yeah, that's what they've been fed and they are regurgitating on command.
Not one has mentioned the extent of the lies, how often and repeated by many in his administration. Nor have they mentioned his campaigning with Beyonce and Jayz the same day that he gave his Rose Garden speech. It is painfully apparent that Obama doesn't really care about much except getting re-elected, those 'bumps in the road' have to be covered up, can't have a terrorist attack on an American consulate, nope, especially after he armed the damn terrorists. During the hearing it was made public that Al Quaeda and the other radicals have anywhere from TEN TO TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND shoulder mounted grenade and rocket launchers.
Anyone who still supports Obama after this is beyond brainwashed, they are supporting the terrorists because Obama armed them and allowed them to get their hands on Guadaffi's weapons. Now he's doing the same thing in Syria. I would ask that his supporters get a clue but that would be asking the impossible. Note that those rockets can take out aircraft and they are unaccounted for, that should make the Obama supporters very happy,
Obama found, "Pimp with a Limp," the place to be on the Anniversary of September 11th, 2012
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/obama-chats-with-pimp-the-limp-dj-laz-on-911-morn/
SOME very interesting reading down to here---and what I find totally dumb-founding is that THE BIGGEST LIAR,TRAITOR in U.S.HISTORY in sitting in OUR WHITE HOUSE!
OBAMA still is trying to HAND his swill out--only this time PEOPLE DIED and he CAN'T HIDE anymore. HE and CLTOON and ALL OTHERS who came in contact with the INTEL and DID NOTHING are as RESPONSIBLE as if they PULLED THE FRIGGING TRIGGER---
CONGRESS had better get some BALLS and do their job or WE the PEOPLE will replace them to---SOONER than later---OBAMA and CLITOON need to be CHARGED with TREASON and MURDER.
Sept. 8, 2012, the chief executive of Libya warned Obama personally that a terrorist attack against the Benghazi consulate was imminent. Obama did nothing, except for some reason send the American ambassador to the most dangerous city in Africa.
After the attack was reported to him, which the State Dept. people watched live on video, Obama went to bed without making any decision, leaving responsibility in someone else's hands. Thus the supersonic tactical aircraft sitting in the NATO airbase in Sicily were not ordered into action (they could have been loaded with bombs and ammunition to be in Benghazi within 30 minutes of his order, and all of the 100+ terrorist enemies could have been killed without any American deaths), and 4 American diplomatic personnel were murdered and our consulate was destroyed, with American secret documents taken possession of by AL Qaeda-related people. The next day the lying began, and it has only grown each day since.
OBAMA has been lying from the start---"AL Q and THE TALIBAN are done for " I BEAT THEM---this is what the LIAR said and has been saying---BUT GUESS WHAT there MR.LIAR IN CHIEF---YOU are a bigger FOOL than CARTER and BILLY BJ ever could have hoped to be--YOU ARE a JOKE--an insolent, militant, incompetent, narcissistic, execrable, America-hating slug.
AMERICA will be a FAR BETTER PLACE with you gone---MAYBE you can JOIN your BROTHER in KENYA--that is if MO will allow it!
YA all want to collapse me GO AHEAD as IT WILL PROVE that YOU can't handle the TRUTH!
NO OBAMANATION in 2012 OR EVER AGAIN!
We would still be getting told that all of this was because of a 15 minute video and that we need to be more sensitive to the Muslim beliefs so these horrible acts would never occur... Did you forget the week that followed this attack? It wasn't like the Democrats were coming out and saying that it wasn't or any of the news media was trying to find out the bigger story. You should be thanking the House Republicans for doing their job which is to hold this President and his Administration Accountable for his actions.
What I am getting from you is that because something happens during an election year that it shouldn't be investigated. Watergate didn't even remotely come close to this level of wrong. An Ambassador and 3 other men were killed on 9-11 and we the people were told that this essentially was our fault for being insensitive to the Islamic Religion.
News people were doing their very best to find this movie producer guy and were going to sacrifice him to fanatics. I remember thinking, "These guys are trying to get this guy, his family, and his friends killed." The media was rounding up the actors and those people were scared for their lives. All in a concerted effort to appease these Islamic fanatics that began with this Administration blaming this stupid ass video for the deaths of these 4 guys. I want you to really think on that. If the Democratic Party was in the House this is what we would have continued to be sold. Now, you want to blame the Republican Party for coming in and going, "Hold on... This doesn't smell right. Let's bring in some of these people and find out what is really going on."
We do have a problem but it isn't with the Republican House doing it's job. Had the Obama Administration simply said, "There was an attack on one of our embassies. When we have more information we will release it. Right now we need to find out what happened and bring these murderers to justice." Instead we got, "There was a protest over a Religious Video that depicted Mohammed in a bad light. The protest got a little out of hand and a few people died because of it... We have Freedom of Speech but this video abused it... we are doing an investigation of the Producer of this video."
Now, tell me why we shouldn't impeach this President?
@Independent Thought#1.44: I will not get into a grief contest with you here. I am truly sorry for the loss of your child. Personally, I assure you I carry qualified empathy in several ways. Two of which are accidents and war. I honestly don't get why the President would try to hide any of this, nor do I believe He did. The families of both the Ambassador and the ex Seal have asked the republicans not to politicize the deaths of their loved ones. This should be honored. Do you know anything about "Darrell Issa"? If you are a caring honest person you should find out. If you already know, and can post such, I doubt you are whom you claim. Additionally, claiming these speculative shenanigans being put on by the republicans are totally humanitarian, and not politically motivated is nothing more than raw bullsh^t, and you very well know it. I take It you don't like "Joe Biden". I do. Don't preach to me about who sounds looney and over emotional. Taken in total, your proposition looks and slants like a usual lie. What does that make you? Maybe a soothsayer/Seer? Anything but a liar huh? You're fooling yourself.
You Republitards are so funny. Almost 13,000 people are murdered in the U.S. each year because you are against any meaningful gun control. Then you cry over 4 people getting killed 1/2 way around the world. Get real!
Obama/Biden in 2012. It's the only smart thing.
Mac,
Even Obama's media friends are scratching their heads in disbelief, as to how O and team handled the situation.
I am sure, as you so surely state, the president isn't hiding anything for political re-election gain. Ha.
WAdan1959,
If our administration would have told the American people the truth, even on day 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,or 14, it could have been different. Instead they lead what appears to be a trail of deceit.
And the hits just keep on coming!!!...obumbo needs to just give his concession speech and head on outta town!!!
OBUMBO GONNA GET AN ASS BBQ MONDAY NIGHT!
foreign policy? what foreign policy?
...
WADan
Again, Gun control, by law abiding citizens, is our right. Gun control DOES NOT keep guns out of the hands of criminals. What, do you think they just walk into Bass Pro Shop, and buy them? Wake up.
I suppose you think gun control might have prevented this disaster as well? Well, guess who was armed, and who wasn't.
Here is the protection the embassy in Cairo had:
As the situation outside the American embassy in Cairo continues to grow increasingly tense amid a controversial video that mocks the Prophet Muhammad, a Marine blog is stating that Marines there were not allowed to carry live ammunition. The blog NightWatch claims that U.S. ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson "did not permit US Marine guards to carry live ammunition," and as a result, "she neutralized any US military capability that was dedicated … to protect the US embassy." NightWatch does not name the source of its information, and State Department officials would not discuss embassy security details
http://now.msn.com/marines-guarding-us-embassy-reportedly-had-no-live-ammunition
Don't tread on me - When you are aware, you can prepare.....
Off topic but when you compare the U.S, to other Countries that practice Strict Gun Control we come below them. Sweden and Norway have higher rates of violent crime per population average as does the U.K., France, and China. After looking at the Statistics on Gun Control I'm not impressed. In fact you could make the statement that because of Gun Control we had a much higher rate of crime. Now that they are falling off the books the issue of violent crime is decreasing. We are one of the few countries that is seeing a decrease in criminal activity not an increase.
One of those "people" was a friend of mine. He was a brilliant tactician in the service of his country. The two ex-Seals were doing this because the Ambassador had asked them to help him out because he kept getting denied Security. There was no Security allotted to the Ambassador at all. These men then went on to save 20 other American lives before being killed. I don't know what your problem is but you do have one. When citizens die in the service of our country then it is always sad. We have four. Two of them were straight up heroes. That we had a President that lied about how they died is worse. That you had to use family quotes from that first week of endless untruth
It was the mother of Glen Doherty and the Ambassadors Dad that requested that the death not be politicized. My friends mother is sickened by this President and has stated that she felt that Obama sympathy was fake. She wants answers. I think she deserves them. If Obama had handled this properly they wouldn't have to worry about it being politicized. I think the President should be impeached for his actions. Then they should do a criminal investigation. If it turns out he turned downed security requests for political reasons then the President should pay for it. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/tragic_ma_optimal_my_ass_wYmDf3u12EExRAoeCAsyZI
Tell that to the mother of one of the MURDERED VICTIMS!
http://faithfamilyfreedom.com/obama-lied-to-mother-of-murdered-benghazi-official/
Obama Lied to Mother of Murdered Benghazi Official
CNN interview with Anderson Cooper
Ambassador Stevens family and the others that were murdered will do the same that Brian Terry’s family did…
In February, Terry's family filed a $25 million wrongful-death claim against the U.S. government, saying he was killed because federal investigators allowed guns to fall into the hands of violent criminals.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/18/brian-terry-fast-and-furious_n_1892271.html
'My son is NOT very optimal... he is very dead': Mother of U.S. diplomat killed in Libya attack slams 'insensitive' Obama's comment about security fiasco
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220241/Barack-Obama-Benghazi-attack-Mother-diplomat-criticises-Presidents-optimal-comment.html#ixzz29qAv5o5f
JS and others???? Please tell me WHERE in this story it says "there were repeated requests for mor security"??? The only one mentioned that sounded serious was on 9/11. The day of the event. This story even SAYS that they had conflicting intelligence discounting the one's saying Al Qaeda was getting more involved. Is this political? Hell yeah. Issa has been the King of doing this the entire time he has had this position. They haven't even completed the study of what happened yet... he releases everything.. Gee wonder why??? Election in three weeks? No.. THAT can't be it.... You guys are pouncing on this like fresh meat.. May I ask where your indignance was for the original 9/11 where we had reports of a possible attack? The USS Cole? The Kenyan Embassy? Guys, there were TWELVE attacks in US embassys under bush. Count them. There were attacks within the US during Bush (not counting the original 9/11) so for you guys to pounce on this one attack as if it was the FIRST is just laughable. Was there a breakdown? Yes. So let the study get finished, (not Issa's stupid report) and make sure it doesn't happen again.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57536524/before-death-amb-stevens-warned-of-violent-libya-landscape/
On August 2, six weeks before he died, Stevens requested "protective detail bodyguard potions," saying the added guards "will fill the vacuum of security personnel currently at post who will be leaving with the next month and will not be replaced." He called "the security condition in Libya ... unpredictable, volatile and violent." It's not known what happened to that request.
wives fan: That's why you need to actually research the news. Rely on nbc and you are clueless.
With Obama yucking it up and a little too delighted with himself today about his newest juvenile sound bite-- "Romesia"-- now we'll start seeing how funny his case of "Benghaziitis" is to the America public.
Remember, it was Romney that miss fired on this to begin with.
Romney was yucking it up last night too.
I don't find Romney's tax plan viable or funny.
People are dead, and it had nothing to do with Romney - get a grip!
Romney's health care plan and tax plan will kill far more people.
Eric. Stay out of our politics. We don't need your foreign view.
Sorry Mike, nice try...but where have you been? That issue has already been explained in the current events news. You can go ask your Republicans about continuing this sorry rude smear campaign after being asked to desist and shut up by members of the families of those who tragically lost their lives. It was the Republicans who voted down the funding for more security, President Obama was not in charge of how the Republicans in the House voted. Did you ever take a class in Civics, study parliamentary procedure or the structural form and function of our government? Duh...here's the scoop if you missed it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
Eric-913730 #2.3
Answer this.....
Only in the sick and twisted mind of the liberal would Obamacare be seen as compassionate for seniors. Liberals can rant all day about how conservatives want people to die in the streets because they don’t want them to have affordable healthcare. They can rave all day about how Obama just wants to provide affordable, even free, healthcare for everybody, including the elderly. Obamacare is turning out to be a giant, festering sore that has been covered up for the past two years by politicians and media, but its pestilential odor has permeated the political air the more the bandages have fallen off.
Yet another Obamacare tax has taken effect on October 1st. Now there is a penalty for readmitting a patient within 30 days of the patient’s discharge. Who do you think this affects the most? Yep, the elderly and the disabled. Obamacare is really taking care of those seniors, right?
The Associated Press reports:
About two-thirds of the hospitals serving Medicare patients, or some 2,200 facilities, will be hit with penalties averaging around $125,000 per facility this coming year, according to government estimates… For the first year, the penalty is capped at 1 percent of a hospital’s Medicare payments. The overwhelming majority of penalized facilities will pay less. Also, for now, hospitals are only being measured on three medical conditions: heart attacks, heart failure and pneumonia. . . . Under the health care law, the penalties gradually will rise until 3 percent of Medicare payments to hospitals are at risk.
Hospitals and doctors are already seeing decreasing reimbursements from Medicare, even less than what they were prior to Obamacare. This means that hospitals have had to cut hospital stays short in order to remain in the black, and patients are being discharged before they’re ready. And now, if they come back within 30 days of being discharged, the hospital is subject to a new fine. It’s all part of cutting costs and making healthcare more affordable.
For those who are “healthy, wealthy and wise,” this measure changes nothing. But for those who are poor, sick, disabled or old, it means that their healthcare may become so expensive, it might cost them their life. This is the liberals’ version of compassion. Depriving the most vulnerable of people from healthcare is simply “for their own good.” These individuals are too expensive to care for and therefore not worth saving. Who needs the infamous “death panel” when this new tax takes care of eliminating the weaklings?
Excellent.
Anonymous Insight
Sort-a shoots that idea all to he!!, doesn't it.
House Democrats opened Wednesday’s House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing by attacking Republicans for cuts to embassy security funding— cuts that only happened thanks to overwhelming support from House Democrats, including House Oversight Committee Ranking Democratic member Rep. Elijah Cummings. In fact, more House Democrats – 149 of them — voted for the cuts than did House Republicans, of which 147 voted for them.
Issa went on to note that Charlene Lamb, the State Department official who fielded security requests from the Libya U.S. diplomatic officials had said that money wasn’t the reason for the slim security in Libya. Consider this exchange from the congressional hearing on Libya last week:
“It has been suggested that budget cuts are responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Miss Lamb,” said Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.). “You made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which lead you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”
“No, sir,” said Lamb.
May the truth be told, we American's deserve it.
Where was Fox Noise and the repubs when Rice declared she knew nothing about planes flying into buildings, then WALLA, a letter surfaced PROVING THEY DID RECEIVE SUCH LETTER.... Hypocritical POS, 3,000 people died on illegal Bush's watch.
This will be an interesting debate Monday... Foreign Policy... Will it be Bush policies or Obama policies that when the debate... Last debate Romney stated that he is diffrerent from bush in many ways, but the next day Ryan is doing a photo-op with her in Cleveland, OH... 17 out of 24 advisors for Romney are people from Bush administration.... Not a coincidence... The Republicans are demanding questions, but do they really want the answers because a lot of them will be exposed... The Romney-Cheney Doctrine is in place... If Romney is elected trust and believe we will have two wars at hand Afghanistan and Syria maybe even a third between Iran and Israel.... War is money, palms are definitely greased....
@times...Ms. Lamb is one person under a lot of pressure and she has testified that it was her decision apart from budget considerations. Her testimony makes her a scapegoat and gives you all what you think is a right to point fingers and yell human error, but one person is one thing, and this in no way takes away the importance of the wrong decision of the members of Congress that voted against funding for safety and security of human resources at our consulates and embassies, bases and stations abroad.
I SAID THIS WAS NOT A PARTISAN ISSUE ABOVE. At the very most all you can claim is mass human error in Congress, and the point here is that President Obama does not control how the members of either party vote in Congress NO MATTER HOW YOU REPUBLICAN PARTISAN TROLLS TRY TO BLAME HIM! I rest my case AND STAND BY MY POINT.
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!
This will be an interesting debate Monday... Foreign Policy... Will it be Bush policies or Obama policies that win the debate... Last debate Romney stated that he is diffrerent from bush in many ways, but the next day Ryan is doing a photo-op with Condoleza Rice in Cleveland, OH... 17 out of 24 advisors for Romney are people from Bush administration.... Not a coincidence... The Republicans are demanding questions, but do they really want the answers because a lot of them will be exposed... The Romney-Cheney Doctrine is in place... If Romney is elected trust and believe we will have two wars at hand Afghanistan and Syria maybe even a third between Iran and Israel.... War is money, palms are definitely greased....
I"mnotconcernedaboutreality, could you please post a copy and/or a link to that letter, I'd like to read it... Thanks so much!!
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
Romney probably supported the attack in Benghazi somehow. He hinted to his corrupt rich friends he needed a foreign policy crisis to take advantage of.
Gosh, amazing how the Obama supporters can support him even now. Guess they are hopelessly unable to see reality, the cult mindset runs deep. Only thing Obama cares about is Obama. His supporters are the little useful idiots that he hopes will get him re-elected. Lenin nailed it.
@wake up working class, I am on the same page as u... Isn't it kinda a coincidence that before the killing of the ambassador Chris Stevens and others. Romney came out while and before the killings and during JUST RIOTING... How did Romney know about the attack on the U.S. EMBASSY and it was not attacked at the time he called the EMERGENCY NEWS CONFERENCE, to score political points,; The ambassador was not yet killed, but MITT ROMNEY STATED THAT THE AMBASSADOR HAD BEEN KILLED IN HIS NEWS CONFERENCE. All the Republicans can say is that " HIS TIMING WAS OFF.." What timing, What were they waiting for? Did he jump the gun to early...." And to all it was stated once and only once, IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB...
Oh get over it. Romney isn't the problem, your hero is the problem and blaming anyone or anything for his lies and failure is rather pathetic. Now you're attempting to paint Romney as Steven's murderer? That is beyond ridiculous and borders on insanity level desperation.
Anonymous: Please, we all understand the need his supporters have to make excuses for Obama, his actions...or, in the case of Benghazi, his inaction and his lying about the causes after the fact are all out there, the facts are out and they are damning. Obama couldn't be bothered by the missing and later found dead Ambassador, he had a campaign fundraiser to attend to.
Eboni: If it was an inside job, it was done with the current administration's guidance. There is some interesting information about Stevens and weapons and Obama's handing weapons to the radical Islamists that isn't looking too good for Obama and crew.
@mygirl... I am a Obama Supporter... A full time worker, A full time mother, A full time MED STUDENT... And to say that were idiots... You have your own views thats fine as we all should... But to say That the POTUS only cares about himself... COME OUT OF THE BOX GIRL.... CAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOUR COMMENT IS SAYING ABOUT YOUR SMALL MIND... I believe in some one who will save our economy.. Yes it's not moving fast enough, but we are seeing light coming out the clouds... When you, yourself, gets in a debt over $0-16Trillion.. How long will it take you to pay that all back to your creditors, pay your home bills, your basic essentials at home (grocery, clothes, food, etc), and have money to enjoy yourself with your friends at a girls not out... 4 years.... I don't think so... Would you want your child, that you are raising with everything you have, to give up on you cause you can't get the toys or clothes they want right then and there... You tell them that Mommy is going to get it just hang tight... Don't you eventually get it for him/her, Yes... And it 's the best feeling in the world to see there faces light up..
Me saying this... Pres. Obama inherited a huge crisis more than any other president has... We believed in him 4 years ago that he could change America around... And just because it's not moving at our pace, but is moving in the positive direction... Auto-Industry blooming, when Romney stated that it goes bankrupt.. Wall Street up with regulations, Stock Market up...
PATIENCE IS A VIRTUE... THAT'S ONE THING THAT WE AS AMERICANS DON'T HAVE.... WE ARE READY TO GIVE UP ON SOMEONE SO QUICK WITH A GIVING THEM A TRUE CHANCE... PRESIDENT OBAMA DID MAKE PROMISES... SOME WAS VERY ACHIEVEABLE, SOME NOT MET, BUT HE DOES CARE AND I BELIEVE HE WILL CONTINUE TO TRY AND FINISH HIS TASK... YOUR GOING TO HAVE OBSTACLES IN YOUR LIFE, BUT WHEN THERE IS A BUMP IN THE ROAD YOU SLOW DOWN... LOOK WHERE WE HAVE BEEN TO WHERE WE ARE NOW... IT'S NOT ALL PEACHY, BUT WHEN YOU HAVE HOPE AND FAITH TOGETHER IN THE SAME RESPECTIVE ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE... YOU HAVE TO CRAWL BEFORE YOU WALK...
WE HAD TO CRAWL IN THE BEGINNING, 2009, AND I BELIEVE A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE WALKING NOW.. MIGHT NOT BE ALL, BUT WE WILL GET THERE... WE SHALL ALL OVERCOME...
REMEMBER THE GRASS IS NOT ALWAYS GREENER ON THE OTHER SIDE...
Eboni,
Do not drink the kool-aid. Romney's FP team is made up of Bush II neo-cons. As for thise whole Libya snaffu, Obama will probably bury it finally on Monday. For sure it will come up and for sure Obama is going to explain it in full.
If the Republicans want to use it as a political weapon from there on they can do so at their own peril. This will become another fast & furious type of issue where it will hurt them in the long run as people look back and realize it was a tragedy but not as big of a deal as the R's are making out to be.
No one that I remember on the Democratic side was calling for Bush to be impeached for 9/11; which was much worse and caused by the same kind of information issue.
@MY GIRL....
EXCUSES ARE TOOLS OF INCOMPETENCE, WHICH BUILDS MONUMENTS OF NOTHING....
I DON'T BELIEVE, FEEL, OR THINK THAT ONE PERSON ON HERE INCLUDING YOURSELF IS INCOMPETENT...
If you don't like Pres Obama... Thats your feeling.... But me, I don't have to make excuses for anyone... Stop watching FOX news... Pick up the Newspaper, Read... DO YOUR RESEARCH BEFORE MAKING, GET THE FACTS.... THEN COME TO THE TABLE WITH ACCURATE INFORMATION....
What do you think the Prior Administration and the Romney-Ryan, Cheney-C. Rice-Karl Rove.... Would have done differently than this President Obama... WAR!!!!!
We went to war because of a Lie... Weapons of Mass Destruction that 11 years later they still have no evidence of.... Netanyahu and Romney are really good friends and he's stating that Iran has a nuclear bomb to launch on Israel... This man brings to the UN SUMMITT A CARTOON (COYOTE AND ROADRUNNER STYLE) PICTURE OF A DAMN NUCLEAR BOMB WITH A SPARK AT THE END...
MITT ROMNEY SAYS HE'S DIFFERENT FROM GEORGE BUSH, BUT 17 OUT OF THE 24 ADVISORS ARE FROM BUSH-CHENEY ADMIN... THEN TO ADD INJURY TO INSULT PAUL RYAN IN A PHOTO-OP WITH FORMER SEC OF STATE CONDOLEZA RICE... OH YEAH WHY DID "COLIN POWELL" LEAVE AFTER BUSH WAS ELECTED HIS 2ND TERM... CAUSE HE NEW WHAT THEY WERE AFTER MONEY... MONEY... MONEY... THE RULER OF ALL EVIL.
LET'S TALK ABOUT A COVER UP.... Were's the Weapons of Mass Destruction not found.... Still not found... 100's and 1000's of innocent soldiers dead... BUSH-CHENEY
PRES. OBAMA= 1ST TERM OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD.... Wasn't Bush, Sr. after him as well when he was President. Bush, Jr. couldn't find him (8 years), President Obama 2 1/2 years in, Osama bin Laden dead...
My girlllll, my mistake. The corrupt rich in this country would never do anything like that. Why, they even care about the working poor. Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Nah, the corrupt rich will be destroyed and their wealth redistributed so that everyone will eventually be poor. You don't have a clue about business, in your mind business only exists to employ people and profits are evil. You also don't have a clue as to how you were screwed over by your democrats and republicans in office nor do you have a clue as to who Obama reappointed to head up the financial arms of the government. Speaking of Bush retreads...how many has Obama appointed? Now, make an excuse as to why those foxes are back in the henhouse.
As to Bush, you use Bush to excuse Obama when Obama is behaving exactly as Bush. You cheer the murder of bin Laden and ignore the chanting 'Obama, Obama we are all Osama' crowds overruning the Cairo Embassy. You have bought into the talk and conveniently ignore the action. It sounds real good on the surface, but once you look inside, it is rotten.
Money? You probably believe that Obama 'saved' the auto industry don't you. Doubt that you have looked into who got what and how the taxpayer got screwed in that deal.
I doubt you will read this post, however, it may help you understand a few things better....rose colored glasses aren't really a good way to view reality.
http://Immartin.hubpages.com/hub/The-Real-Wealth-Redistribution/
''Here is what I will say, If four Americans get killed it is not optimal---Barack Obama''
Karma is a real biatch isn't it obumbo?
Someone needs to demand that the fat cat Issa , the House, and the Senate to answer why they cut/voted against the funds for overseas security, and then went merrily on their way home for a vacation rather than getting their work done???? Perhaps for a change the buck should stop at the Congressional doorsteps. Isn't it amazing how the lazy good-for-nothing Rethuglicans can cast the stones so quickly??? But, they sure kept their yaps shut for the entire 8 years of the Bush Gestapo Regime without ever asking one question. Republicans don't know the first thing about honesty, integrity, or hard work. But they are outstanding experts at Voter Suppression, Women Suppression of Rights, ignoring the 47%, lying, famous for their hourly manipulations and chameleon colors, experts on paying slave wages without one benefits, voting against help for the returning VA, and experts at acquiring all the social welfare benefits for the elite only. And now they want to take away SS, Medicare, healthcare, allow more of our jobs to go overseas, and still allow the corps their tax exemptions (only to tell us later that they need to raise our taxes). Didn't you just love hearing Romney say in the debate that the elite pays 60% of the taxes, and that THEY NEED MORE MONEY TO HIRE WORKERS? THE GULL OF THAT LYING B. And did they hire any workers during the Recession even when they did have their tax cuts??? No, but HELL NO !! And they never did in the past either. Oh, but they need more money according to Romney. If ever elected, we'll see the most extremist policies, infringement of rights, higher taxes for the middle class to cover the elite's under paid taxes, increased expenditures, unpaid wars resulting from both of their out of control tempers, unwillingness to hear the other-side without threats and interruptions. What you saw from Romney's disrespectful behavior in the debates, is just the beginning of what you'd see, if he ever got into the Oval Office.
Yes, the Republicans are going back to the Bush days. Why else does Romney have so many of Bush's former staff currently working on his campaign staff. Look at how they are so gallantly displaying Rice alongside of Romney. Who in their right mind would ever want 8 more years of the gestapo Bush/Cheney years???? Wasn't this Recession bad enough for us 47%???? Isn't it funny , too, how the elite had no money to hire more workers (instead just doubling the work load among the few remaining employees with threats), but had billions to spend on the campaign elections and intimidating signs to turn away voters. If anyone is so blind that they can't see through their philosophy, then they are the ones, who really shouldn't be voting. HOW DARE THOSE ARROGANT, SELFISH , SELF-SERVING, LAZY GOOD-FOR-NOTHING JERKS TELL PEOPLE THAT THEY CANNOT VOTE WHEN THEY ARE U.S. CITIZENS, HONORABLE WORKERS, AND HAVE A VALID ID???? SAY "NO" TO ALL THE REPUBLICANS UNTIL THEY REFORM THEIR UGLY AND UNCARING PHILOSOPHY with a complete lack of willingness to compromise and negotiate. Their first agenda less than 12 hours after an election is to kick Obama out. Does bigotry still exist among those ole white men having a difficult time taking orders from a well educated and intelligent Black man??????
Finally, there are approximately 3, 000 people in FL alone that are being denied the right to vote in spite of the what the Courts said they couldn't do. Yet, in the past, less than 5 illegal voters committed fraud in that State (I believe that there was only one case of fraud found to be invalid). Bush ignored the prior Taliban threat of attacks, and we got stuck with the groping T.S.A. along with the lack of privacy because of it. Now we have the Corporations with more campaign rights than all of the 47% put together. We have drone flying over our homes, and the big corporate elite now threatening us as how to vote or else, or else they'll fire you to cover their lost profits. What in the good Lord's name will happen if a Republican Gestapo like Bush and Romney ever get into the White House or Congress again????? Start demanding some answers from them as they are accountable to us. Watch for the Freudian slip of the tongue from the candidates, and esp. flowing from Romney, who means every word of it. You expect immediate answers from a Black President, now try it with the lazy ole fat farts in Congress.
Vote a straight Democratic ticket, because at least these people care for the 47 %, the sick, elderly, vets and women. (not in binders). Vote out all the Republicans OUT and let them know that we have more than enough of their outright selfishness and attitudes.
GO 2012 Obama/Biden !! Hard workers, caring, and great personalities!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Some characteristics severely missing from the Republican side.
Ticked off in Ohio:
Four killed in the embassy is now where in comparison with the 3,000 killed in N.Y. on 9/11 under Gestapo Bush's Regime.
Out all the Republicans in 2012 for their laziness, self-serving lies and manipulations. We don't need to regress back to the Feudal Lord Dark Ages. I'm tired of paying their taxes for doing nothing these past 4 years, plus 8 years during the Gestapo Bush years. The next time they are so eager to go off to war, let the fat cats go off to fight. Stop sending our young people overseas to do their dirty wars brought on by the D. C. Congressional testosterone behavior that we esp. see in the House. And put Mitch at the front of the line if the backward, bigoted ole white boy hasn't resigned. They need to know what it is like to fight 24/7 only to come home and be vetoed for help in the House.
@my girl, Tell my I'm stupid all you want. It's not going to stop my from expessing my views any time I damn well please. I don't believe that the rich owe me a job and I know the President has worked with the other side to get things done which is more than I can say for the republicans. But this extreme republican wave recently is cruel and I can't believe there are such extreme views during a time like this. And because of their unconcern for the working class, I wouldn't put anything pasts them. Maybe this new economy is working for the rich. But they would have to be blind to not notice that this isn't working for everybody. Extreme views are the last thing we need right now. Everybody has to be able to thrive in this new economy, not just the rich.
Just like Bully Romney,"you don't know how business works, you shouldn't be president". I'm so sick of Republican crap words!
Ticked Off,
Want to post the whole discussion for context? He was responding to Stewart stating that the Libya situation was not optimal; that was not a phrase he came up with (read as he was agreeing with John without rephrasing the statement).
Romney's health care plan = Obamacare
Just saying :)
Eboni Watson via Faceslapped,
Your ignorance is ignorance; no right to believe anything can be derived from it. - Sigmund Freud
WRONG PRESIDENT Eboni Watson via Faceslapped
Iraq: 2003 Operation Iraqis Freedom from President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655, "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" Justification Section 2 Weapons of Mass Destruction, Section 3 US Policy Overthrow President Hussein.
FYI: Basic High School US Civics and US Government, It is the Job of the US President to Enforce the US Laws as created by the US Congress, the Only valid excuse is if their are no US Congressional Appropriations. The President does not pick and choose which US Laws to Enforce. So when President Bush was told to Enforce H.R.4655 with US Congressional Appropriations or US Congress will refuse to Appropriate Funds for anything else that President Bush wanted, that is what President Bush must do, same with All Presidents regardless of Political Party.
9/11 2001 Attacks. October 2001 US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces attached to CIA's SAD/SOG go into Afghanistan to Overthrow the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government for providing Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada with Islamic Sanctuary and support to plan, conduct the 9/11 2001 Attacks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arxKhJIjIiY
2001 Operation Viking Hammer, the elimination of the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban, Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada, Islamic Jihadists that escaped from Afghanistan on the Old Silk Road to Northern Iraq and renamed themselves Ansar Al Islam.
2002 Operation Hotel Calfornia Attacking, Seizing, Securing of the Iraqis Chemical Weapons Facility at Sargat Iraq.
2002 the Primary Mission of Operation Hotel California, the creation of a Strategic Operational Feint to make the Iraqis Military Command and Iraqis Political Leadership believe that the Main US Military Attack will come thru US Ally Turkey. So that the Iraqis Military Command will deploy the majority of their Iraqis Military Forces North of Baghdad. In preparation to accomplish 2003 Operation Iraqis Freedom in accordance with President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655. with the Main US Military Forces coming from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies that left the US Blind and Deaf to the Events leading up to the 9/11 2001 Attacks, Cut to the Bone Reduction In Forces of the US Military that would normally independently verify Intelligence Agency Information becoming Actionable Intelligence. US must rely on information (not even intelligence) from Potentially Hostile Nations like Jordan, Pakistan, etc. that have their own Agendas. US Allies refuse the US access to their Intelligence Assets for fear of compromise.
US Congressional 9/11 Commission (Committee) Investigations, Findings and Recommendations, with former President Clinton, "I'm a so sorry".
Those of us that survived the above, while many did not, KNOW THE TRUTH; Not your Political Sound Bite Nonsense.
Eboni Watson via Faceslapped
What did President Obama spend $2.1 Trillion on, that was not previously Budgeted for; requiring the current Budget Cuts to previously Budgeted for Programs, Projects, and Agencies.
Post your answer below in 30 Minutes. NO LAME EXCUSES.
Name the US Laws that were elminated that made Illegal the Causes of previous Depressions, that resulted in the current $60 Trillion to $100 Trillion Global Economic Crisis consisting of the Mortgage Crisis, Wall Street Crisis, Financial Crisis, Banking Crisis, Credit Crisis, etc..
And who eliminated those US Laws.
Post your answer below in One Hour. NO LAME EXCUSES.
This is NOTHING but a political move by Issa. He has been doing it since he took control of his committee. There were TWELVE attacks on us embassy's under Bush not counting the original 9/11. Many of these we had advance warnings. Where was your indignance??? Issa won't even wait for the study to be complete. Just throws out any and everything. Not policital my ass. They need to let the study complete, figure out what went wrong and make sure it never happens again. These are desperate times for republicans because they can feel the election slipping away...
David, that would be he repeal of the Glass-Stegall act that occured over a period of time, but almost always at the hands of a republican member of congress or republican president.
All this Libya coverup boils down to Obama trying to make us look like fools. He think he could cover Terrorist attack with the thumb of his hand. He want us to believe that by killing Bin Laden that was the End of Terrorism. President Obama wants to bring DOWN THE UNITED STATES not Terrorism he can't afford to go against his people.
Anonymous Insight, you are so wrong, you must watch too much MSNBC and NBC news for sure. Republicans had nothing to do with cutting defense spending, Obama was not going to pass any cuts at all if they the Republicans did not allow his administration to cut defense spending, that is why it took so long to come to any deal on any cuts. Defense spending cuts are all on the Obama White House, no one else. But the Libya attack on our consulate had noting to do with cuts, it was an inept Presidential administration that never answered 4 requests for more security and an Ambassador that thought their safety in Libya was in jeopardy. No doubt about it, the Obama administration dropped the ball, messed up big time, got 4 Americans killed and they could have prevented it, and then went out to cover it up with a video story. End of story. This is just one of many, many reasons that Mitt Romney will be the next president of the United States.
"How dare you politicize this! I will not stoop down to the gutter and dignify it with an answer! Instead, let me tell you about the symptoms of Romnesia... "- Barrack (dont use my middle name) O'bama
This is all a disgusting and despicable narrative being told by the left. I don't hold Congress blameless for those things Congress does, but holy heck, just a few short years ago you leftists could barely even acknowledge that Congressional democrats voted FOR war resolutions and funding against Iraq, preferring instead to simply lie and claim that Bush took us into an ill-advised war against all the wisdom possessed by the Democratic Party.
My complaint about Mr. Obama in THIS case isn't that four Americans died because his administration didn't provide enough security--funding was not the problem, so please quit lying that it was. No, my problem is that the security was not provided for the same reason the lies that have been told following the attack were given: The president's claim that AQ was in retreat everywhere was his major foreign policy claim to being a strong president, and it was never true.
This president, and many of his appointees, and apparently nearly every one of his voters here, lied to us all about what happened and why. He, and all the rest, knew what they were saying, and what they continue to say, was and is wrong. They said it for political effect. Presidents and their staffs make mistakes, sometimes people even die because of this. We shouldn't, and I wouldn't, minimize the gravity of those decisions, but the lying in order to protect a few poll points in swing states is beyond disgusting. It is immoral. To the extent you leftists continue to front these lies you, too, are immoral. Voters must punish you and your party, and this president, for what you are doing. If we fail to remove this cancer from our White House then far greater damage can, and will, come our way. The world IS watching.
I love how the left wing loony liberals keep going back to Bush's Presidency to defend Obama. They insinuate that if you put a Republican in office it will be the same as Bush or that Romney would be the same. Obama himself always tries to imply that Romney would just follow what caused the economic crash in Bush's last year. Anyone that believes that Bush caused the economic crash is a moron, the road to the crash was started by Clinton's signing of the Community Reinvestment Act that allowed Bank, Mortgage Lender and Investors to give out the easy mortgages. Loans and Credit to those that didn't qualify before. Combine that with most Americans spending wildly on Credit and we had an economic bubble that burst. No matter who was president at the time it was going to happen. The Democrat Congress at the time was warned by John McCain 2 years before the crash, that the bad mortgages would b a big problem and cause economic disaster, the Democrat Congress blew it off and even some of the had gotten loans from the very same banks that held the most bad mortgages. Either way comparing what another Presidential party did years prior has no bearing on what Mr.Romney will do, I am sure Mitt Romney will do it his way and I am sure it will be the right way as his past history is full of proof he does things successfully. he has done it as businessman and as a governor. Why comparing what past presidents did and candidate now is moronic, as I could say the Democrats were the party of the Ku Klux Clan for many many years, and Jimmy Carter was the worst President ever so Mr.Obama shouldn't be re-elected just because of those facts (stupid isn't it).
Hi RonH,
Two simple points I'd like to clarify about your post. It was Mr. Carter that signed the CRA, and it was Mr. Clinton that signed the extension and modifications to the CRA. My point is that the problem began a long time ago, long before Mr. Clinton was president. He just made it far worse.
And Mr. Bush went to Congress with a reform proposal to change how Fannie and Freddie did business so that the bubble would at least stop being inflated. Democrats in Congress didn't just block any and all reforms, they also said that Mr. Bush simply wanted to harm poor people and minorities. Maxine Waters, Bobby Scott, Alcie Hastings, among others, called Mr. Bush a racist for wanting to make changes. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, among others, said nothing at all was wrong with the housing mortgage industry, including F and F.
For fun people should look at the distribution of political donations made by F and F. They overwhelmingly, meaning nearly all of them, went to democrats. Reforms weren't seen is racist--those were lies told by liberals to try to keep people from considering support for those reforms. No, the reforms were seen as an attack by republicans on a major source of campaign funds. Think about it...democrats helped ruin our economy and further burden our kids so they could have an easier time getting elected to office.
There is an alternative explanation which is worth considering. Instead of being conniving, disingenuous, and duplicitous, elected democrats might instead simply be incompetent. I prefer the former since it implies democrats are smart, just very unwise. The latter explanation puts the USA in the position of being able to do nothing right but through dumb luck. What a bad way to lead the world that would be.
Okay, both parties made mistakes. So, then, we have to take away social security, medicare, medicaid? Send our children to war to die? Give our houses to the banks? Lose our pensions and retirement? Raise the price of education so that it is impossible to educate our children? When if the rich just paid their fair share of taxes they might have to give up their private jet? The republicans on this site sound like 20 year old spoiled brats who have never worked a real day in their lives. Not old enough to feel their bodies start to get old. No children to worry about. You don't think poverty can happen to you? You are wrong. The people allow these stinkin rich people to be rich. They don't deserve to be rich if they are going to hold the American people hostage and pay these bully republicans to lie and scare the American workers. "We will give you jobs if we can have our taxes cut and take away all of your social programs". What a bunch of crap lies. IF I WANT TO BE TOLD WHAT I BELIEVE AND WHO I AM AND HOW ILL INFORMED I AM, I WILL WATCH FOX NEWS! Nobody here is going to tell me how to think when I have lived the republican hell in a repulican state, right to work, what a joke. I am aware of what I spend my money on and if it has to do with making another a hole rich, I don't buy. BUY LOCAL! It's up to the people if the rich stay rich. And if they don't care about the working poor, the poor. Then we are not going to give a damn about them. I will not send my son to war for these rich jerks because that is what it is all about. Your sons before mine Romney.
Obama/Biden
You already follow the democrat talking points, you obviously have a hard time taking care of yourself and require the government to take care of you. I live in a 'right to work' state, the reason there IS work is because the unions can't get a foothold and destroy business with unsustainable demands. Note how many cities in CA and elsewhere are going bankrupt, and the primary reason is the inability to pay for pensions.
The 'rich' are not the people running small businesses, if you want to go after the 'rich' take a look at Obama's supporters. Think they're poor? Think they are giving to Obama so he can tax them more? Nope, they give to Obama because they figure the fix is in, that what Obama says is far from what he does. Note that Obama and Holder have stated that they will not prosecute the people responsible for the financial collapse or did that escape notice. The democrats talk a good line, however, when it comes time to screw the taxpayer, they are first in line.
Where do you think the financial collapse originated? Only republicans? I posted a link which you obviously didn't read, don't want to educate yourself, far more satisfying to scapegoat and place on a pedestal a man who isn't doing diddly to change the conditions that brought about the financial collapse. Nope, drink the kool-aid, keep believing a myth, don't inform yourself of the fact that the democrats had their faces in the trough just as deeply as the republicans and their 'social engineering' was the root cause of the financial collapse.
No point in arguing its simple a vote for Obama is a vote for Communism, a vote for Romney is a vote for America. you decide.
Personally I stand by what I always have. I put my life on the line for six years in defence of the American way of life, I am not going to turn my back on that now, I can't understand why anyone would throw our country to the dogs, but Obama will and you with it. I have no choice but to vote for America, so my vote will not go to Obama in any fashion I have to vote for Romney the lesser of two evils.
You won't get an answer from Obama.
This is why Hillary is his scapegoat.
He is too busy campaigning to deal with our overseas security requirements, (among many other things).
Obama must go.
Let's see he got Bin Laden and is winding down both wars. We are more respected around the world than we ever were.
This is Republicans trying to downgrade Obama's strength in foreign policy.
Whose to say that the Republicans didn't pay mercenaries to attach the embassy just to try and influence the election.
He did NOT get Bin Laden, that was already long in the works before the community "organizer" took office.
He wound down the wars for mere political reasons and now the enemy is laughing at us and killing even more.
Why you libs cannot see this is a real puzzle.
TO: Viewer_Ready who wrote:
That's a lie and you know it!
As long as Republicans were in office, Osama Bin Laden was safe.
Obama/Biden 2012
Need a new viewer there Randy,
Obama is the only one that can order that kind of military operations. It's shameless Republicans won't give him credit for it.
I love how Republicans criticize but never say what they would do differently.
Sorry Eric, but most of the world sees the US in decline. They had hope when he was elected, but it appears that he let them down as well.
Viewer...........because they are blinded by the aura around Obama's head.
Sorry Truthspeaker, you don't speak the truth.
"
The global enthusiasm for US President Barack Obama has fallen "significantly" since he took office in 2009, but in many countries there is still strong support for his re-election in November, according to a poll released Wednesday by the US Pew Research Centre.
Confidence in Obama fell from 86 per cent in 2009 to 80 per cent in Europe, and from 85 to 74 per cent in Japan, the two regions where the US president is most popular.
But despite disappointment with some of his policies, such as growing opposition to the drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere, there is still support for him to stay in office another four years in some places in the world.
His re-election was favoured by large majorities in France (92 per cent); Germany (89 per cent); Britain (73 per cent); Spain (71 per cent); Italy (69 per cent); the Czech Republic (67 per cent); Brazil (72 per cent) and Japan (66 per cent).
Read more: http://india.nydailynews.com/newsarticle/66b5bd50a6621f4257df73a7d79559de/obama-s-global-approval-rating-falls-but-world-wants-re-election#ixzz29n6Ppegx
They are blinded by facts.
Bush put the Bin Laden kill in motion and knew it would happen and let the military do the rest.
Obama, just got lucky and pulled the slot handle on a machine already working and got lucky.
The mock up on the compound alone started WAY before Obama was in office.
Obama HAD to flip the switch, or risk being disowned by the military and the American Public.
It's awful odd that the war draw downs and the death of Bin Laden came about eight months before he
was to start (or re-kindle) his election campaign.
Liberals have the most amazing way of distorting truth.
I don't even think you guys wear rose colored glasses.
I think the are painted over black.
NOW, you have troops who VOLUNTEERED (most for careers) coming home to Obama's unemployment lines.
NOW you have loyal civil servants being forced to retire early to make way for the few troops who will get
the chance to replace them.
It's time for the lemmings to wake up.
I for one will not follow you off of the cliff.
It's funny that you try to blame Obama for veteran unemployment when Republicans just blocked the veterans job bill.....Repubicans are soooo laughable.
That bill was not in the best intrest of veterans.
I know, I am one.
it was blocked because the spending authorized in the bill violated limits that Congress agreed to the previous year. it was not due to the republicans hating vets, they were just looking at the big picture financially...i can get a job on my own, now granted i cant speak for all vets but there are programs that are already out there, now do they all work..who knows, would this one have worked? sometimes we have to sacrifice a little for some restraint on capital hill
and if Obama was for vet employment then why are the people he appointed being allowed to force out 3k sailors (myself included, with 5 years left on my contract)....all i got 13 years with not a blemish but a 30,000 thank you check that I wil have to pay back if I apply for VA benefits...at 10% disability a little over 100 bucks do the math on how long it will take....The only thing this administration appreciates about the military is how good we made the president look
Viewer_Ready
Your comments are so full of @!$%# I had to stop reading to put my boots on. Maybe you would like to offer some verifiable proof to the supposed facts you just pulled out of your ass.
And as a retired veteran.. You don't know what the hell you're talking about.
If YOU were a retired veteran like I am , you might know.
You will need to put on hip waders if Obama is re-elected.
Get a life people, your beating a dead horse.. 911 ring a bell.. Bush was on Vacation...
VH Navy
If you are being forced out it is because of the force draw-down and failure to live up to the retention standards put in place by The Department of the Navy. Every branch of the service has retention standards which are managed through Qualitative Management Programs (QMP). Every branch of the service has early retirement programs for periods of force reductions. None of the branches arbitrarily get rid of their best and brightest (that's counter productive). You don't make rank fast enough you're not retained. You get passed up by a promotion board, your not retained. It's not Obama pulling those strings, it is the Pentagon drawing down the forces because a war has ended and budgetary cuts are looming (820 billion put in place by Republicans as a concession for voting to raise the debt ceiling).
I would suggest you place your 30k in the bank and take advantage of your Post 9/11 GI bill benefits. Where else are you going to get 4 years of college tuition paid for, all your books paid for, and a living expense stipend each month, so long as you attend for 6 credits a semester. You can even apply for student loans, cuz guess what, the package is tax free.
By the way, that college package; thank Obama for that one.
Viewer_Ready
21 years and fully retired Viewer, and what I know is that you can't substantiate one damn thing you said. Link us some proof to your claims.
funkster01
21 Years Retired here also funky... And worked in the Separations/Retirement branch for over 6 years (I was stations at HQ AF Randolph AFB, TX... Ya know the place where they interpret the rules and then pass them down to the Numbered AF's) ... I had to know what the VA would and would not covered and I also had to know what the requirements were for a RIF...
And as far as the 'RIF' went, it was almost like a lottery...
They cut a Block of people and then you could take your chances to stay in and risk getting cut, or taking a 'Buy Out' and get out with a better settlement.
Not sure which service you were in but in some of them, they don't promote you by the amount of dirt you can eat or how much you can hump on your back all day.
And I am sorry, But I have to side with Navy on this one.
NAVY: IF by chance you do collect VA Benefits, DO NOT LET THEM TAKE BACK the TAXES that you paid on you separation pay... There is a LAW on the Books that prevents that... I know I submitted it to my Senator back in 1990's and it was passed.
American Girl -724855,
In 2006 President Bush Amended the US No Assassination Policy to allow the Termination of Osama Bin Laden. Harvard International Review, 2006, Article, "US No Assassination Policy On The Offensive".
Unclassified: The Original Mission Operation Neptune Spear was planned by General McChrystal (US Army Special Forces), Admiral McRaven (USN SEAL), Director of the CIA delegated to his SAD/SOG with input from the US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces. The Mission was to Locate and Capture Osama Bin Laden, failing Capture then Termination. The Capture of Osama Bin Laden was necessary to gain information on his Thought Processes, Planning Processes and Procedures, etc. as imprinted on the others of the Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada to allow the US and US Allies to interdict all Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada Activities.
Unclassified: All Electronic Communications of Osama Bin Laden were being looked for. So Osama Bin Laden used Couriers. This allowed the US Intelligence Agencies to follow the Couriers to the Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada Operations Officer and eliminate them one after another. The Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada Operations Officer raises Funding, coordinates Fundamentalist Islamic International Al Quada Franchises Activities Worldwide, Plans Operations, etc..
funkster01,
Viewer_Ready is almost correct about the SR (Special Reconnaissance) Mission that turned into a Direct Action (DA) Raid.
So that I don't get another Letter of Reprimand for Disclosing "Potentially Classified" Information, you can wait 20 years under the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain the Mission Cam (Videos), Video Conferences, etc.. Pay special attention to the 23 minute communications blackout at the Whitehouse, I want to know just how loud President Obama could yell all the way to Bagram AFB or Pakistan to "call the shots". The Highest Grade US Military Officer as the OSC (On Scene Commander) was General Petraeus (scapegoat #1), As Commander of JSOC Admiral McRaven (Scapegoat #2), President Obama's Executive Intelligence Agency, the CIA, Director Leon Penetta with Presidential Authority (Scapegoat #3). Secretary of Defense Gates out of the loop (spectator). SOS Clinton "Allergy" in a Nuclear Biological Chemical Filtered Room, LOL, out of the loop (spectator).
funkster01,
I don't care if you Retired after 30 years, if you were not US Military Asymmetric Warfare you don't know ANYTHING about these Missions, Operations, Chain of Command, etc..
And I did not see President Obama wearing our stereoscopic night vision devices, waiting to get on the MH-60s or MH-47s (not CH-47s) at Bagram AFB.
Yeah, President Obama really likes US Military Veterans that is why as Commander In Chief he has Ordered the current Reduction In Forces of 90,000 US Military to be dumped on Unemployment further straining the Veteran's Affairs (Administration) as well as throwing on Unemployment 108,000 US Civilians employed by the US Military. January 2013 more US Military thrown on Unemployment as well as US Civilians employed by the US Military, as well as Cuts to Veteran's Affairs (Administration) Budget.
Hey Funky:
The following is an excerpt from the OMB statement:
“TRICARE Fees and Co-Payments: The Administration agrees that retirees deserve a quality health care benefit. For this very reason, the Administration strongly supports its requested TRICARE fee initiatives that seek to control the spiraling health care costs of the Department of Defense (DOD) while keeping retired beneficiaries’ share of these costs well below the levels experienced when the TRICARE program was implemented in the mid-1990s. The projected FY 2013 TRICARE savings of $1.8 billion and $12.9 billion through FY 2017 are essential for DOD to successfully address rising personnel costs. DOD needs these savings to balance and maintain investments for key defense priorities. The Administration is very disappointed that the Committee did not support the proposed TRICARE fee increases and included section 718, which, while supporting some fee increases.,
Read more: http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2012/05/wh-committed-to-hiking-tricare-fees/#ixzz29nhIqM4U
MilitaryAdvantage.Military.com
David, do you mean the McCrystal that Obama threw out (for criticizing him)?
If obama gets credit for bin laden, then he gets the blame for stevens. Oh wait, the president who claims there is a war on women by republicans is blaming the women, Lamb and Hillary, for stevens. Sorry. My mistake.
He loves the defense contractors as well, especially their employees. He requested that those pink slips be kept on hold until after the elections, didn't want the unemployment rolls to swell, doncha know. Might not look too good for his record and all. Might not help his re-election bid. Interesting how he also told those employers that the taxpayer would cover any lawsuits incurred for following his 'request.' WARN LAW violations being what they are, there is the possibility of lots and lots of lawsuits since the law demands those employees be give 60 days notice and Nov. 6 to end of December is thirty days less than the law allows for. Obama is real good at using taxpayer monies to cover his butt.
Like I stated before President Obama does NOT listen to his own "Experts". As Registered Democrat General McChrystal was nominated by President Obama and confirmed by US Congress.
General McChrystal, US Army Special Forces (Asymmetric Warfare), Commander of Special Operations Command; previously Joint Special Operations Task Force Iraq, located and captured President Hussein (experience in Locating and Capturing a High Valued Target).
We were all cheering at least we finally got a US Military Leader that knew about US Military Asymmetric Warfare to fight Asymmetric War Afghanistan. Those of us that served with him previously at Iraq knew what to expect.
If you knew all the details about President Obama, President Obama's Political Appointees Holbrooke and Eikenberry, General McChrystal, the US Civilians of General McChrystal's High Level Staff, Chain of Command, sending 1/3rd of the 90,000 requested, screwed up US Civilian Surge, etc., you would say WTF President Obama.
By the way because President Obama did not have a Legal Leg to stand on, he had to make a Deal with General McChrystal to Retire as a Four Star General instead of a Three Star Lieutenant General to get General McChrystal's Letter of Resignation. Being a Registered Democrat General McChrystal accepted President Obama's Deal, instead of demanding a Public US Congressional Hearing to Relieve him of Command, with all the "This Administration Does Not Know What It Is Doing" becoming Public Knowledge and Destroying President Obama's Political Career.
President Obama also previously did the make a Deal thing with General McKiernan (General McChrystal's Predecessor) to get his Letter of Resignation after not listening to him either.
The community organizer has met his waterloo and is over his head
David: If you look at Obama's actions regarding the Middle East, it would seem that his goal is to advance Sharia law in the entire region, ditto radical Islamists whom he seems determined to arm to the teeth. He kills Quadaffi, ignores the protests in Iran, supports the overthrow of Mubarak, tells Israel to pound sand and ignores the murders of Christians and other non-muslim groups all over the region and North Africa. He calls the mass murders commited by an Army 'major' standing on a desk and yelling "Allu Akbhar" workplace violence. He attempts to befriend the Taliban, want to sit down and 'talk' and practices a 'catch and release' program with them, the only requirement being that those released Taliban 'promise' not to fight again.
There are now over 2,000 dead servicemen in Afghanistan and he's stated that we will be pulling out, drawing down soon, like 2024. He invited the Muslim Brotherhood into the White House and ignored Netanyahu and other heads of state, has created an agency to help bring 'former' terrorists over here at government expense while giving government money to Muslim businesses to open business here, and has removed the word 'terrorist' or any suggestion of 'anti-terrorist' training for the military. Obama is the bestest friend any radical Islamist could hope to have.
Thanks for answering my question, David. It seems you know more about what happened than the news does. I just remember reading in the news (on this site two years or so ago, I think) about how McCrystal was critical of Obama, and Obama wanted to get rid of him. I recall the article saying that he was a very skilled military man. His was a great loss...all because of Obama's wounded ego.
That was interesting about Kadaffy. A long time ago, early 90's or so, a guy I knew, an anarcho-syndicalist, had a copy of Kadaffy's Green Book. He let me read it. I remember it sounded very progressive, and I thought that well maybe Kadaffy was not such a bad guy. I had not heard anyone mention this book in all this time. This person I knew had a way of finding some very radical and unusual literature.
It seems like what always happens is that the U.S. comes into a place and removes some strong man; and after we do, the situation has a way of getting worse.
This whole embassy thing is messed up too. When the news broke, they said the building was destroyed and the ambassador killed. They said a safe house was trashed. Then Obama and Co. kept saying for two weeks it was all because of some video and was a spontaneous protest. The pictures showed these huge mortar shells lying on the ground (not the sorts of things generally seen at protests). And...how would protesters know where a safe house was? What was coming out of the white house lacked believability. I have been on a number of protests. I never went to one where people had mortars or where people knew where to find a secret safe house. It seems the more the White House covers it up, the worse it gets. It is turning into Watergate. I just don't know why they would want to not protect an ambassador. Now Obama has fessed up that it is terrorism, finally; but I no longer hear them talk about the safe house. They seemed to have forgotten about that.
To viewer (Post # 3):
Be careful, your manipulative, short term memory filled with ignorance is showing. Where was Gestapo Bush during the 9/11? Why he was too busy reading books upside down in a primary school. And did he leave when he found out? No way, he just went right on reading!!!!
Viewer Post 3.2 , etc., etc.
You need to stop drinking the blue cool aid.
I doubt seriously that you served one day in war zones. So where's your proof, because you act like a completely uneducated redneck boy that the military would never accept. Soldiers don't blatantly lie as ignorantly as you are doing on this site. History speaks for the facts which you obviously are having great difficulty dealing with. If the plan to get Bin Ladin was written by Gestapo Bush, THEN HOW COME IT TOOK HIM 8 YEARS NOT TO SUCCEED IN GETTING HIM???? Also, the plans were rewritten, since Bush's weak efforts were not working. So leave it to a Democrat to get a man's work down (which Obama did in a big way)!! I'm sure that was upsetting to you little Republican boys!!
Take off your "Rose Colored Blinders" because as an old saying goes: "There are none so blind as those, who won't see." (And I might add to hear).
Empress-409341,
HYPOTHETICAL:
A US Military Asymmetric Warfare Task Force that was at Nation Y for years of consecutive tours have their R&R and Leaves at CONUS cancelled. Most know the language(s) and culture(s) at Nation X. From available intelligence they have identified the attackers. They are then sent from East Coast CONUS by USAF Supersonic means to US SETAF. Enroute Mission Planning is occurring. Coordination between US SETAF and US AFRICOM is being made. Mission updates are continuous based on more Actionable Intelligence. Coordination is made for the US Military Asymmetric Warfare Task Force to be transported from US SETAF to US AFRICOM via MH-60s and MH-47s flying NOE to avoid potential anti aircraft weapons systems or knowledge of Nation X Government. Day 0, they are at Nation X before anyone else. Their Mission is NOT to secure the "crime scene" and becoming sitting ducks. Their Mission is to perform a search, positively identify those responsible for the attacks with Forensics that the US Law Enforcement wish they had, then hunt down and terminate with extreme prejudice those responsible or the preferred method is to incite the people of Nation X go after the attackers; instead of allowing US Law Enforcement arresting those responsible, giving them as Trial, and then they get a life better than they currently have with 3 meals a day and safe in Prison, as well as being Heroes of the Islamic Jihad ("Islamic Holy War") with their Families completely taken care of.
By the way would you want to baby sit a bunch of US Civilian FBI Agents or would you payoff some Libyans to keep them out of your way.
All of the above is hypothetical of course.
FYI: There is NO such thing as an "Ex USN SEAL", "Ex USA SF", "Ex USMC MARSOC", "Ex USAF STT", or "Ex CIA SAD/SOG", the current ones will get a piece of those Responsible.
Mrs. Clinton face show Bitter look toward Obama. After Election she is trowing her towel.
Viewer_Ready. It is almost impossible to talk sense into these Obama clownes. They don't remember or even have the intelligence to note even early past history. Like O's buddy Clinton having the Golden chance to get Bin Laden in 1999 after the first bombing of the Twin Towers underground parking area February 1993. Bin Laden was targeted with drones, and Clinton didn't take the shot, so 9/11/01 probably never would have happened. About WMD's not being found in Iraq. Syria was a great Allie of Iraq, and I'll bet those Iraq WMD's went to Syria before the US invasion in 2003. Wonder why, and where Syria got there supposed chemical weapons? I'll also bet if we ever got hold of some of those supposed Syria chemical weapons and scraped the top layer of paint off there will be Iraq paint underneath. Too many Democrats with rings in their noses being led down the primrose path.
The buck stops with Obama. He said so himself. He said if he didn't turn things around he didn't deserve another term. He does not deserve one. He cannot keep his job when so many have lost theirs. Obama's reign of blame is over.
Eric and American Girl,
I virtually never agree with either of you. I say virtually only because while I can't remember ever agreeing with something you've written I can't say for sure it has never happened. What the two of you said at the beginning of this thread is the most vile, disgusting, and immoral words you've written. Which says a great deal given how low you have always been. We might be able to find common ground, liberals and conservatives, but I think we first have to quit ascribing to our opposite numbers the most venal of motives.
You two have a great deal of ground to cover to make it anywhere near a position of honesty, let alone non-delusionalism. So let me give you the chance to begin...Do you HONESTLY think that Republicans would have conspired to attack our own US Consulate, then kill four Americans, all so Mr. Romney might look better relative to Mr. Obama?
They grasp at straws in their desperation to paint Obama in a good light. They are either so brainwashed that they don't have the capacity to face the reality of Obama or else they are trolls of the worst sort.
David, I had to read that three times to get what you were saying. I hope I got it right. We identified the culprits. We sneak in to get the guilty party using cop methods. We kill the creeps ourselves, or better yet, let others in that country tear them apart because our justice system is kinder than they deserve. (I hope I understood as all that military and spy lingo is complicated).
I just hope we all have the satisfaction of seeing these guys caught and getting what they deserve by whatever means.
David
I was unfortunately stuck off line so I could not get here until now. I noticed that you seem familiar with General McChrystal. Are you a part of his unit? I sided with The General when Obama threw him out. I notice you say that there is no such thing as an Ex-Navy Seal, Ex Special Forces or Ex-CIA are you referring to a statement of loyalty meaning there is no such thing as an Ex because Ex implies it is no longer a part of them? Or are you saying that they never retire? If you are meaning the first statement than you are more than correct because you take that with you even in death. It is surely in the blood and is a part of them forever. These people are the best and the most dedicated men in America. That is why they are called the Best of the Best. If you were one of these guys I definitely "tip my hat" to you. And thanks for serving America.
I am currently helping Fred W. Rustman in getting the word out to help save and fix the CIA. If you will be kind enough to click on my Avatar which will take you to my News Vine home page you will see an article called "To Save The CIA". Please read it because the link includes an article written by Fred W. Rustmann Jr. who is CIA retired and has an impressive record. Here is his record; Served for over 24 years in the CIA Clandestine Service. Was a member of the CIA's elite Senior Intelligence Service. Held CIA assignments in eight countries in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Currently Chairman and Founder of CTC International Group, Inc., a private intelligence firm. Author of CIA, Inc. He wrote an article called " CIA Harmed By Reorganization.". After you read the article would you consider spreading it far and wide because I am helping Mr. Rustmann save the CIA by spreading this in the hopes of making this issue heard so something can be done. Please help this noble cause. Thank you.
All I can say is that it is disgusting the way this dumbass can lie to the American people and not get called out and made to explain. I dont care what color he is, or if his supporters think he can walk on water, he is a liar that won't answer the important questions. And to this day he has not said what his plan is to fix the economy, all he does is run childish ads knocking Romney. I guess his next four years slogan is hope like hell someone can make something change!! That is his hope and change! His idea is to hire more govt workers. Well dumbass, who pays for those jobs? The taxpayer, which costs money WE don't have! Come on people, prove your not an idiot and don't vote for this clown again.
"President Obama is an honest man", and "Mitt Romney is wrong". Vladamire Putin
Obama/Biden 2012
Of course you would be willing to validate Putin statements because he is a socialist. Typical for the left wing.
Where's Romney's answers about his taxes.
If Romney can't even tell the truth about his taxes what kind of president would he be?
So Putin is a good man that should be listened to now? I guess liberals agree with Putin's way of running a country....as long as he supports Obama.
Anyone but Obama / 2012
Oops, Rand Paul says Romney is wrong about the middle east.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/10/opinion/rand-paul-romney-foreign-policy/index.html
Who gives a rats about taxes.
We just had four embassy employees murdered because of mass incompetence.
And you are worried about someones taxes?
The man knows how to make money.
He will turn America around.
All liberals know how to do is give MY money away to slackers.
Thank you, I was thinking the same thing! On all points!
All you have are the same lame ass Republicans (Issis being one) claiming that he lied. Yes, the very same Republicans that claimed Obama lied about "Fast and Furious" (Issis, Grassley). Ohh.. what's that; Obama was actually telling the truth about his involvement all along.. You don't say. And, Eric holder also told the truth about his knowledge.. Well, go figure. I wonder how the Republicans got it so wrong from the get-go?
Its the same ole story with Republicans: Get behind in the polls: cook up a scandal attempting to implicate the POTUS. Can't win fairly: Lie, cheat, steal, cover-up, flip-flop, give the dog a bone...
Just like the last cooked up ploy by the Republicans, this one will get disproved too.
People who pay taxes care about taxes. People who are calculating how much their taxes will go up under the tax dodging traitor Romney. Off shore accounts are for drug dealers, insider traders and other people who have no respect or love for this country and its people.
Where was your outrage when American civilians were killed by Republican incompetence on THE 9/11.
He knows how to make money? Like Madoff , Skilling, and Kenneth Lay. Romney has made his money by investing in outsourcing to China. That is the turn around he will bring America.
Your ignorance is ignorance; no right to believe anything can be derived from it. - Sigmund Freud
President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies that left the US Blind and Deaf to the Events leading up to the 9/11 2001 Attacks, Cut to the Bone Reduction In Forces of the US Military that would normally independently verify Intelligence Agency Information becoming Actionable Intelligence. US must rely on information (not even intelligence) from Potentially Hostile Nations like Jordan, Pakistan, etc. that have their own Agendas. US Allies refuse the US access to their Intelligence Assets for fear of compromise.
US Congressional 9/11 Commission (Committee) Investigations, Findings and Recommendations, with former President Clinton, "I'm a so sorry".
Based on the US Congressional 9/11 Commission (Committee) Investigations, Findings, and Recommendations New York City puts back into place the previous capability cut by President Clinton to be able to shoot down aircraft:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwqaOwU04sg
AAHHHH. HA. HA. HA. HA. HA. President Clinton gave China Most Favored Trade Nation Status so that he could get Chinese "Donations" (Bribes) as stated during President Clinton's Impeachment Hearings as "Chinagate".
You think it is a coincidence that President Clinton was the Governor to Arkansas. And the Headquarters for Made In China Walmart is Arkansas.
David, respectfully if you had done your homework you would have known that the Clinton administration had notified the Bush team of the intelligence threat. You may be surprised but there is a paper trail that clearly shows how the Bush administration failed to take the threat seriously up to five weeks pre 9/11. Clinton had nothing to do with the 9/11 lack of awareness it was the Bush administrations and his team that failed the country.
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
I was there, where were you. Don't give me some manure written by a non participant and tell me that that is a big juicy steak.
I know exactly what President Clinton did because I survived all the Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies, and his Cut to the Bone Reductions In Forces of the US Military, 14 US Military Installation Closures, etc..
And I did look at exactly the source of the information (not even intelligence) that could not even be verified, did you.
It has been part of my Job Description to know all of these things in detail.
David, respectfully I don't doubt your information or the depth of your work. However, you also should know that in any investigation all the facts are relevant. Your argument regarding cuts is one factor but the Clinton administration in this instance is not solely at fault. If you were that involved then you would also know that there were several U.S. field intelligence sources who notified their superiors of the impending threat. You also would be keenly aware of the daily briefings the president receives including intelligence concerns. The 9/11 Commission a bipartisian panel realized and showed that the Clinton transition team notified the Bush team of it's concerns prior to 9/11. When Bush's team was in place several memo's regarding the threats were considered and determined as not serious. This information is in the 9/11 Commission's report and was made public upon it's findings. The memo's including as I said one five weeks pre 9/11 played a major role in that despite repeated warnings and concerns by those in the intelligence community the Bush administration dismissed their significance. I am not accustomed to putting forth "manure," as credible information. I am sure I can find on any given day opposing views of what size the military, intelligence or any other area of the government should be. Experts abound along with opposing assessments but at the end of the day it's the facts that support the final analysis. You obviously feel based on your experience that the Clinton cuts were far to deep and the sole contributing factor despite the findings of the commission.
Chris,
that movie is completely over-hyped by Republicans. Watched it, was not too impressed. Frankly I do not believe your past makes you who you are in the present; there is no such thing as destiny. All there is is what you do and how you act in the preset, how you act towards those weaker or different than you. That is what truly determines your character.
2016 is much adieu about nothing.
Geowil#4.15: I tried to watch the thing. After about 20 minutes I got to laughing so loud some one complained to an usher. The usher asked me to try to hold it down, but I'll be damned if I could. I just got up and left. One has to be very weak minded to pay any attention to that mess. Regards
Read the US Congressional 9/11 Commission's Recommendations also, not just the Findings. I had some input into the Classified Sections.
My "skin in the game" (I don't play games) was that after the President Clinton Cut to the Bone Reduction In Forces of the US Military many of the US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces became US Law Enforcement, Firemen, EMTs, etc.. New York City was hiring the Most Veterans. I lost many friends made in Combat.
After the 9/11 2001 Attacks. I organized my Teams attached to the CIA's SAD/SOG and we went into Afghanistan for Vengence. One Group linked up with the Northern Alliance; Our Group (experience from Operation Cyclone) went into the Afghan Cities to elminate the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Militias a lot of us did not survive in fearce Urban Warfare.
add to post#4.17.
As a perspective. My peers are my Brothers and Sisters by choice, not accident of Birth. My subordinates are my sons and my daughters, also by choice, not accident of Birth. They are MY Family. Their Respect is Earned by my Actions and Results, not just given.
Because of President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies many of the US Intelligence Assets at many Nations NO Longer Existed. After losing Funding many became those Nation's Counter Intelligence, since their day jobs (cover) did not pay the bills. In most cases we ended up going in without any Local Intellligence Assets, while those Nation's Counter Intelligence Agencies, Military, etc. were looking for us.
During Operation Continue Hope, we lacked local US Intelligence Assets as well as having to rely on the Pakistanis Military for support since the President Clinton Cut to the Bone RIFs of the US Military. You would know Operation Continue Hope as the Battle for Mo(gadishu) aka Blackhawk Down.
After President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655, Section 3 US Policy Overthrow President Hussein, was signed into US Law we went into Iraq and hired a hundred thousand Shia (mostly from Iran) as insurgents, assassins to Overthrow Sunnis President Hussein.
Because all the previous US Intelligence Assets at Iraq became Iraqis Counter Intelligence the hundred thousand Shia were captured, tried, and executed as Traitors. President Clinton spun this to "Dictator Massacred His Own People". We barely escaped and hid at Iraq, to later conduct Target Damage Assessments during Operation Desert Fox, President Clinton did not allow us to do the Targeting, as he believed that by Targeting the Iraqis Government there would be no one to negotiate Peace, so President Clinton as Commander In Chief Ordered the Airstrikes and Cruise Missile Attacks on the crowded Urban Poor Areas of Baghdad. We opposed based on experience that you do NOT mess with the Poor of Islam, President Clinton did not listen. Thousands of the Urban Poor of Islam died, inflaming the "Islamic World" naming the US the Great Satan.
Many previously Pro or Neutral Iraqis then joined the Holy Warriors of Islam (Islamic Jihad) against the Great Satan. We escaped out of Iraq to Redacted.
All the missions, operations, etc. after that were the same problem, no local US Intelligence Assets to link up with. Because of the President Clinton Cut to the Bone RIFs of the US Military our replacements were never trained as it takes Decades (20 years) to train including College level Language(s) and Culture(s) for our Area(s) of Operation(s), without the languages and cultures and no required operational experience (6 years), (10.5 years) average age 35. This does not include other required training (Arctic/Winter Warfare, Desert Warfare, HALO/HAHO, Jungle Warfare, Mountain Warfare, USN Diver, USMC or US Army Sniper, etc.).
I have been involved with the Islamic Nations since the US Military Training Teams to US Ally Iraq, during the Iran Iraq Wars, rotated to Operation Cyclone. The language I learned was Farsi, then Arabic, later Pashtu, etc.. So I witnessed (trained observer) and experienced everything not just reading some books written by non participants.
So, Mary-911256, do tell me about what the books written by non participants say as politically correct so called history.
WOW you Liberals are blind. How can someone say that president Obama is Honest? President Obama is a selfish person with an agenda to destroy this Nation. He want to destroy the very best of this NATION and that is CAPITALISM. People putting Idea to work. Bill Gate Microsoft, Steve Jobs from Apple, Mark Zuckerberg Facebook what would happen if government take away their asset. They worked so hard to accomplish where they at now. why are the liberal jealous of this. Stop having fun in bed and use your head to make something of your life. Michael Moore make millions making films against the Republican and the US. This is the land of Opportunity enjoy it and let others enjoy too.
Live free or Die trying.
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012
@Viewer_Ready, Great Post's. Keep up the great work. Fanned&Faved.
I haven't read through the comments but wanted to point out some things that people here may or may not be aware but that seem to be missing from the reporting on Benghazi. Based on security concerns, U.S. embassies at times will impose travel restrictions on American personnel which limits their movements in country. This happened to me a few years back while serving in a South Asian country in the news lately. The impetus for this decision comes from internal analysis by the post security officer subject to the approval of the ambassador. This travel restriction then impacts all American personnel including the ambassador based on the notion that Americans in diplomatic vehicles , usually identifiable locally by their license plates, are at risk in a given location no matter whether involving the ambassador or a third secretary.
The other item that seems missing is that if the security situation in the capital city such as Tripoli, Libya becomes dangerous in the extreme, there is a mechanism for going to Washington to draw down the complement of American personnel to reduce the exposure to risk or to close the embassy altogether.
I raise these points because everyone who has served in the State Department knows that beefing up security does not happen instantaneously in the best of cases and involves a brokered process in a world where security funds are scarcer than the need for them. I'm not going to second guess anyone who was serving in Libya but everything I've just written was known to key decision makers as they grappled with decisions on staff strength to maintain at the embassy and in-country travel away from the embassy. As someone who has served at both embassies and consulates (in provincial cities), I can tell you that members of Congress and congressional staffers far less frequently travel away from the capital and it's only the select few that have any sense of what life is like in a provincial city in a developing country such as Libya.
It's also important to remember that attacks on embassies are not new and the attacks don't respect the partisan nature of the U.S. government of the moment. We've had attacks against U.S. embassies in Teheran and Islamabad under President Carter, Beirut under President Reagan, Nairobi and Dar es Salaam under President Clinton and Tashkent under President Bush. If you think a muscular U.S. presence around the world prevents these attacks then you are only kidding yourself.
In these type of situations, it is ALWAYS better to be transparent right up front. I think Biden in the V.P. debate came over as a big time liar on this issue. Obama did too, but Biden was even worst.
What were the lies that you think you heard?
Intel2,
Just think President Obama has President Clinton "I did not have sex with that woman" as a character witness.
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
I did watch and still voted for Obama, better than Mitt
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/biden-adds-to-the-libya-lies/2012/10/12/b25227ae-145f-11e2-ba83-a7a396e6b2a7_blog.html
@ Diane-486994, you mean you didn't hear any malarchy that evening from him? The fact checkers, reporters, etc. sure did. They also pointed out some by Ryan. Since you didn't seem to hear any, Google these four words and educate yourself - vice president debate lies.
How do you tell if Obama, and Biden are telling a lie? Their LIPS are MOVING!
you know I would have respected Obama if he came out from the get go, called it what it was and acted like a leader, and got the scum that did this to our fellow Americans...but instead we get stories about a video, telling the UN that we are sorry we allowed someone to use their free speech....can we please get some answers for the families or do they have to wait like Brian Terry's family
VH -
Go back and re-read the article about the reports from the Intellegence...and now there are reports from some of the protestors themselves that it was about the video...
thfan,
Fly your arse to Libya and ask them if they even saw the video, considering most don't even have electricity.
You even believe that it is everyday that pickup trucks have mortars mounted on the bed, Redacted, that pickup trucks with heavy machineguns just happened to be on the routes of advance for Security Forces to get to the US Consulate. And that the precision mortar fires (non line of sight) were an accident and not preplanned. And that the over 100 attackers just got lucky and did not get blown up by the mortar fires or shot by other attackers or blown up by RPGs. And Redacted.
VH Navy, respectfully I am at a loss to find any information regarding a video of the president at the UN saying he was sorry that we allow free speech. I did in fact locate video of the president's speech to the UN post the horrific attack at the Benghazi consulate. The president condemed the violence sparked by the video. He described the video as "crude and disgusting," while strongly defending free speech. He made clear the video was a product of free speech and not a production of the U.S. government. He needed to establish our respect for the freedom of speech and that the views in the video were not those of our government. You most likely are also aware his speech was broadly directed due to the extent of the protests around the world result of the video. If you had spent anytime overseas you assuredly would know that customs and cultures differ greatly. What we dimiss at times as trivial is insulting or offensive to others rendering diplomacy to less than an ideal delicate balance. If you have time I"ve included a link below that is credible and includes excerpts of his speech.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/25/us-un-assembly-idUSBRE88O16M20120925
48 security incidents in the 2 months before the murders, 2 of them attempted bombings, and Hillary decides that she wants to keep security at the consulate "artificially low". The State Dept. official in charge of embassy/consulate security world-wide stated under oath that budgeting more security wasn't a problem. And Obama waits 18 hours before sending in help.
@ 1TruthSpeaker
Why you didn't go and help or join the armed forces and help.. stop talking about national security like you're an expert.
I have not read anywhere that Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans killed were ordered to leave the embassy in Tripoli and travel to a poorly secured consulate in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11. People in foreign service, especially in such volatile areas of the world, are taking personal risks, they know they are at risk and they make the decision about how to manage it and whether to give in to it. It is no different than mililtary personnel signing up knowing they may go to war and police leaving home every morning going to work no knowing if they are coming home. People in such professions recognize the risks, make choices whether the risk is worth the potential good and then carry on. I am sure the victims did not expect to be attacked and die, but they had to know they were at risk for such an event at any time in an unstable country in transition and accepted the risks.
We can learn from this failure and adjust our security standards, but we can never achieve perfect safety in a dangerous world.
what makes you so sure he wasn't sent back there on purpose?
1 truth--Hillary DID NOT keep security "artificially low"
The Republicans cut the funding for security. Per the Republicans voting against the security funding-it was not a priority.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/121011/rep-jason-chaffetz-cut-funding-embassy-security-video
On Oct 17th, Obama told the American public on national TV during the debates: “We’re a nation that believes in the Second Amendment, and I believe in the Second Amendment". But according to a Reuters article that came out on Oct 14th - that was a lie. According to Reuters "Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is
committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws." So just why should the American People believe ANYTHING this man says.
Well done Anita, you've recognised the crux of the matter, that which has escaped so many.
The Americans were at the consulate, DESPITE the known risk.
Evidently, the contracted security considered the threat manageable, otherwise presumably the American party wouldn't have been exposed in the first place. Bad move...
Not to mention that one week before 9-11 Obama and the dems used the killing of OBL for political gain. I would not be suprised if the dems saying over and over that OBL was dead didnt piss AL quda off.
Grumpy. Where do ou get our info? Let me guess.. Faux entertainment... Secretary Clinton told the UN that the USA would NOT participate in their treaty as we have our second amendment .
Anita-2036926,
Wrong US Ambassadors are Presidential Political Appointees, usually Idealistic Academics, for Political Favors or as a Reward for Political Favors.
Don't even compare US Civilian Law Enforcement to the US Military (paid below minimum wages). Ask Police Unions why. And don't even lie, I have been US Civilian Law Enforcement before, and still am a US Military Asymmetric Warfare Officer currently at US AFRICOM northwest. A long time ago I was attached to a US Embassy, Foreign Area Officer.
Most US Ambassadors refuse to listen to the Foreign Area Officer, or anyone else; just like the US Ambassador to Iran.
The Real Question that must be answered is what was so important at the US Consulate at Benghazi that US Ambassador left the safety of the US Embassy at Tripoli. Considering that most of the US Consulate was already evacuated and the US Consulate people at the Airport.
That is a good question, and/or possibly, what was the Ambassador made to believe was so important and by who, in order to get him to go to Benghazi? All part of what is being investigated now.
How do they even sleep nights, let alone lie about not giving these people the security they requested!
Did any of you people actually take the time to read the article? Seems to me that despite the always even handed and fari Darrel Issa, the investigation into conflicting information and who did and said what and when is still underway. Compare this rush to jusdehement to that great hero of yours Dick Cheney who led a nation to war and cost thousands vwersus four deaths from a knonw and proven discredited report of Nigerian uranium fostering weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that never existed.
Greg Goldstein, if you are so damned smart why don't you learn how to spell or at least turn on spell check in your browser. I got dizzy trying to read your post and never did understand you. But I am sure that someday you will grow up and learn how to do something right. Maybe if you take your thumb out of your mouth you might be able to type a little better. Come back in a couple years after you finish grade school.
Nice try Mike but it seems you cannot recognize a typo from a fast keyboarder who has not utilized the spellcheck before publishing his post. Need a translation? fari=fair, jusdehement=judgement, vwersus=versus, knonw=known, and do read closely the content of what Greg is saying here. That is what is important.
"Seems to me that despite the always even handed and fair Darrel Issa, the investigation into conflicting information and who did and said what and when is still underway. Compare this rush to judgement to that great hero of yours, Dick Cheney, who led a nation to war and cost thousands versus four deaths from a known and proven discredited report of Nigerian uranium fostering weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that never existed." Do you comprehend?
If Greg was, as you claim, uneducated and a lousy speller, how would he know how to spell all the other words correctly, words like conflicting, uranium, investigation, despite, Nigerian, etc.? Can we say that you were nit picking in order to make someone seem like they are not able to spell? Very funny ha ha and reminds me of Saturday Night Live in the old days...do you have a conical head too? Oh, that was just my imagination...It is nice to admit it is a joke or when thinking to yourself in order not to confuse others...and when it is appropriate to communicate clearly to many in a public forum.
Iraq: 2003 Operation Iraqis Freedom from President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655, "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" Justification Section 2 Weapons of Mass Destruction, Section 3 US Policy Overthrow President Hussein.
9/11 2001 Attacks. October 2001 US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces attached to CIA's SAD/SOG go into Afghanistan to Overthrow the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government for providing Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada with Islamic Sanctuary and support to plan, conduct the 9/11 2001 Attacks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arxKhJIjIiY
2001 Operation Viking Hammer, the elimination of the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban, Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada, Islamic Jihadists that escaped from Afghanistan on the Old Silk Road to Northern Iraq and renamed themselves Ansar Al Islam.
2002 Operation Hotel Calfornia Attacking, Seizing, Securing of the Iraqis Chemical Weapons Facility at Sargat Iraq.
President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies that left the US Blind and Deaf to the Events leading up to the 9/11 2001 Attacks, Cut to the Bone Reduction In Forces of the US Military that would normally independently verify Intelligence Agency Information becoming Actionable Intelligence. US must rely on information (not even intelligence) from Potentially Hostile Nations like Jordan, Pakistan, etc. that have their own Agendas. US Allies refuse the US access to their Intelligence Assets for fear of compromise.
US Congressional 9/11 Commission (Committee) Investigations, Findings and Recommendations, with former President Clinton, "I'm a so sorry".
Iraq and Afghanistan were both UN Mission, Nation Building, making them 100% Legal by International Law.
President Obama 8===>o Greg Goldstein
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
It is really petty when people like Mike go after grammer and spelling when it is obviously someone going too fast on their keyboard. I got the message that Greg was trying to put forth. It wasn't that difficult.
Okay David, interesting points. So the difference between Bush I and first Gulf War and Bush 2 second Gulf War? Bush 1 included the UN and our allies NATO. Bush 2 just went jolly well ahead and invaded Iraq anyway. So, Obama took measures upon coming into office to make Iraq and Afghanistan official UN Missions 100% legal and respected by International Law and taking into consideration NATO and the international community.
What is so bad about that? As I see it Obama has been taking the correct actions in his leadership on behalf of American citizens and the world community in this area. Another reason to vote for a cool head prevailing and not an emotional cowboy saying "bring it on". President Clinton did warn Bush 2 in advance about the threat to the towers and there was a letter, C. Rice denied knowing about it. That was on CSPAN and I remember watching it.
Again I make my point, presidents are not in vacuums, there are hundreds of other officials around them in government standing their posts, actively making decisions from the designated authority of those posts. It is a shame to take partisan shots and politicize security and defense issues for campaign purposes, but it is valid to question investigations into mistakes or corruption and information leaks, bribes, blackmail or other ties within defense organizations to other countries or their contributions of money and information that could create a weakness, compromise, or risk of the well being and domestic safety of American citizens.
The investigation into 9/11 was both valid and very necessary. So is this investigation ongoing. But neither are partisan issues. They are American issues. If anyone knows this -Obama knows this. It was one of his primary points in his first speech at the Democratic convention years ago. Many of those in the coalition of the left feel that he has taken too much effort and time, bent over too far backwards in trying to work toward compromises with the Republicans and he has BEEN MAKING A FUTILE EFFORT. It is too bad the Republicans have not been reciprocal with all that stubborn cliquish filibustering, (a la Norquist pact), in any attempts to meet him in the middle on some things so that we could benefit more efficiently and quickly in repairing and building back our nation this last four years. Their obsessive targeting of his supposed flaws, personal or other, and their neglect of The American People, especially the needs of the working middle class and the less fortunate, are their OBVIOUS failures.
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
Learn how to READ.
Bullsh!t that was already done by President Bush (43) in 2001, as I posted.
NOPE. I was there, where were you.
President Obama to circumvent US Congress "The Will of The People", keep clicking "Next", see anything Unconstitutional, TOUGH, that is what YOU Voted For:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions
add to post#9.7
The only thing you see (Insight) is President Obama Rear End.
President Obama signs into US Laws his January 21, 2009 Patriot Acts (Plural US Laws) that Eliminate Constitutional Rights. Shown during a staged News Media Event, January 22, 2009 signing his Patriot Acts, 04:38 minutes of 11:55 minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLSeD19m3UE
To close a loop hole in his Patriot Acts, President Obama signs his 2012 NDAA, the US Military Indefinite Detentions of US Citizens:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IeuE16LLDY
Oh by the way david, please do not put words in my mouth or attempt to label me. Again, as mentioned before about someone using such tactics of intimidation and character defamation (and I sure do not know why you resort to it but you have a thing here, even to the extent of mentioning doggy defecation and diarrhea in your metaphors, and you make the mistake of not explaining your own imaginary visions and objectification coming from your own biased POV, (point of view) in your political language and labeling. Instead of focusing on the point, you are attacking those you are having a dialogue with when they are actually posing a question. That is rather rude and answers nothing.
President Obama did not do the big sales pitch and General Custer charge into Iraq no matter what you say. One could always follow your example and echo back to you that you are worse than a right wing crusading berserker and will defend Mitt Romney wrong or right to your death but that just shows how silly your own assumption above is in attacking the messenger, forgetting the topic, and not addressing the points in an informatve way.
Your mention of presidential license in regards to closing loopholes is not in a sufficient context or explained enough regarding NDAA for me to address here and there is no argument or comments outside of the unfortunate fact of this new kind of war, many others involved over a period of time with this, current events, and that Mitt Romney said that he would also sign the NDAA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1yY3NCiMVQ
Oh david, you did see this news report just recently didn't you? It is an unfortunate fact of what has to be prevented these days any way it can be...in order to save the lives of American citizens.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/19/14565151-us-attorney-fed-terror-suspect-one-of-most-dangerous-since-911?lite#__utma=238145375.174072277.1350723439.1350723439.1350723439.1&__utmb=238145375.2.10.1350723439&__utmc=238145375&__utmx=-&__utmz=238145375.1350723439.1.1.utmcsr=nbcnews.com|utmccn=(referral)|utmcmd=referral|utmcct=/&__utmv=238145375.|8=Earned%20By=msnbc%7Cworld%20news%7Cthe%20new%20york%20times=1^12=Landing%20Content=External=1^13=Landing%20Hostname=www.msnbc.msn.com=1^30=Visit%20Type%20to%20Content=Internal%20to%20External=1&__utmk=22293240
Anonymous Insight,
Experience NOT your Academic Idealism. Facts NOT your Opinions. Logic NOT your Emotions. Substance NOT your Popularity.
Too bad you lose Anonymous Insight, already lost your Constitutional Rights.
Labeling and objectification, only in big letters this time and it just does not cut it, furthermore, you're not always correct in your corrections either as has already been shown. Those caught in the act of terrorist activities are criminals and a criminal is a criminal is a criminal. I am here and you are because of our individual Constitutional rights to free speech. I like learning and I like facts, it seems that you are the one getting all hot and heavy in your emotional outbursts, I am not impressed at all or interested in continuing feeding this silly authoritarian ego thing of yours any further. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS FAILING BY YOUR VERY RUDE ATTACKS ON OTHERS HERE, WHICH SHOWS BY YOUR BEHAVIOR IN YOUR CONVERSATIONAL INTERACTION. We do not mind when you stick to explaining your points or providing details and references, those can always be agreed with, clarified, researched, and refuted; but when you abuse those you are having a dialogue with, that is not okay, period.
American Girl-724855
The number one terrorist in the world today is Barack Obama. Albeit a financial terrorist, still a terrorist. The islamic world is waiting for Obama to finish bankrupting America. Once brought down they will attack as we will have no army or government to protect us.
Obama is using the Cloward - Piven Strategy. evidence of this is the reckless borrowing and spending. Liberals continue to cry about the 4 trillion dollars George Bush increased the debt by. Oddly that was in 8 years and the last two with a democrat controlled house and senate that went on one of the largest spending sprees in history. Until Obama came along.
Barack Obama has placed America 6.5 trillion dollars further in debt in only 3.5 years.
Barack Obama has gotten America 2 credit down grades.
China and Japan now refuse to loan us money yet Barack Obama is spending money at a record pace.
By bankrupting America Barack Obama can then take over America. Bankruptcy gets rid of the old government, the Constitution, the payments to the 47%, every law and social program we currently have and that pesky army that fights for our freedom.
So keep supporting Obama and hurry and buy you a burqa on Ebay. Your gonna need it soon.
FYI Over 100 rockets have been fired at Israel this month alone from Gaza. Odd it has not made the Obama news networks.
Anonymous Insight
Do all liberals have amnesia? The UN asked George Bush to invade Iraq based on intel that he had weapons of mass destruction. PBS did a very enlightening hour on it and it was Saddam himself that created false intel because he was concerned about being attacked by Syria. Saddam didn't realize that all the world was listening and would take action.
Enlighten yourself so you don't look like a fool.
I am already quite enlightened about that, never said I was not, and wonder why you continue to condemn, jump the gun, and create all kinds of conclusions about other people and their opinions or knowledge with your imaginary assumptions - did you ever learn how to ask first or do you just think you know it all because of the psychic perfect friend that is there in your head? Asking is more polite and avoids killing first and wondering after. Attack away if you wish, but a reality check question is more polite and avoids wrongheaded notions and friendly fire.
Wouldn't you think the Bush team would have been as clever or psychic in figuring that out about Saddam's motives for his continued claims of having WMD until the end when he actually did not? Aren't they the ones who knew him so well already when he was working nicely on their behalf building those dams to cut off the water to those poor old Bedoins who had lived along those creeks with their bison for thousands of years? How tragic...but there you have it.
The point that many are making here is that much of that tragedy, misunderstanding and loss could have been avoided with good intelligence and there is no argument about that. In fact, you were mentioning the frustration of not having good intelligence up there somewhere. Oh well, enough. Its history and retrospect, like the name of that old Buffalo Springfield album. Instead of seeming so much like a broken record echoing down your very own isolated vicious cycle, don't you think that perhaps it is time to just be at ease and let others take their turn at this thread too? Peace, Love and Have a nice day. :)
All I can say after reading Anonymous Insight's posts is that he can't handle the heat,truth, and his picture by his name says it all. He is a BIG PU$$Y!!!!!
Is that really all you have to come back to this discussion with? Name calling? Where have you been since the eighties.. Dick? At least Obama doesn't break promises and cheat like that and check out that cute Rumsfeld handshake, didn't he intern under tricky dicky?
Handle the heat and truth??? Financial corporate interests, Kuwait and exit theater would have been clever but then, Three hundred thousand slain and buried in one go in '91 and Bush 1 plays golf, says he's sorry, but geee garsh golly, he cannot help the folks he just told to rise up against Saddam and "you know, alls fair in love and war", said his official with that @!$%#ty slit eyed grin...and you wonder why the world no longer fancies the USA very much anymore?
Give me a fricking break. Catch up and watch some old news about Saddam, Kurds, mustard gas, the destruction of the Mandan in Eden...blowing up the Museum, on and on it goes.
Here, instead of name calling, I have plenty of truth for you to handle. Facts that some real pros have known all along and any American, after watching this, should be ashamed to vote for anyone endorsed and backed up by members of the war criminal club.
Grow up and grow a pair Dick. A real man can stand by his word because he has already considered the consequences of his actions.
Mismanaging, tricky dicky trained trumpet-blurting, braggadocio-loving, clueless clowns and liars attempting to fill the post of POTUS are one reason why I am voting for...
Obama/Biden 2012.
Saddam Hussein - The trial you will never see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeY05iS5iv0&feature=related
Anonymous, I do read up on history. Read my post @ 3,32. Explains a little about what is happening in the Middle East and why. That is only a smidgen of what you need to be familiar with. I spent a lot of time analyzing things that were happening back then. So I'll leave it at that. By the way I don't trust any politicians. Had a great friend that decided to go to law school, and he said he was going to be one of two things. A Good Lawyer or a Crooked Politician. He became a Good Lawyer helping the middle class, and the poor. I also wouldn't trust those people over there as far as I could throw Alaska.
Obama/Biden....two incompetent jokers.
It's time to admit our mistake,change leaders and move on.
OBVIOUS politicizing.
Yeah... by Obama.
You would think the Right would have been violently upset when two jetliners toppled our Twin Towers, killing 3000. But NOOOOOO! Now they're trying to make hay over wether Obama told us it was Al Qaeda or not fast enough. Does it really matter? Is this like their position that its fine and dandy if Americans kill each other (oh, yeah, remember Pat Tillman? Gawd), or that Al Qaeda killing Americans is far more serious than militias killing Americans.
Republicans are pure scum. What utter vile creatures, born from the depths of HELL.
President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies that left the US Blind and Deaf to the Events leading up to the 9/11 2001 Attacks, Cut to the Bone Reduction In Forces of the US Military that would normally independently verify Intelligence Agency Information becoming Actionable Intelligence. US must rely on information (not even intelligence) from Potentially Hostile Nations like Jordan, Pakistan, etc. that have their own Agendas. US Allies refuse the US access to their Intelligence Assets for fear of compromise.
US Congressional 9/11 Commission (Committee) Investigations, Findings and Recommendations, with former President Clinton, "I'm a so sorry".
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
I'm not a Republican but I can tell you that if you ever made a reference, to my face, that I wasn't "violently upset" about the "toppling" of our twin towers and that I was an "utterly vile creature" I would personally bounce you off every wall within 50 ft of where you were standing...
Where do you get off accusing any political affiliate, whether Dem or Repub, of not being upset about the death of 3000 of our fellow citizens? You, sir, can go straight to he!! and take all 8 of the $h!t for brains that voted up your post with you. Oh and STFU...
Hi 5's Ellie Mae!!!
Talk about somebody that needs to get of the cool aid, and what ever else he is on. That picture of him is in dire need of a shrink.
Intelligence failures, lack of credibility and poor decision making? How about daily briefings ignored in July and August of 2001and 3000 civilians dead? How about non-existent WMD in Iraq and 4000 soldier dead? The republicans have no credibility on the issue of intelligence and security - none! Do we need to find out what happened, why and by who? Yes we do but anyone involved in these kinds of events knows there is more to them than meets the eye and the more they say about what they know, the easier it becomes for enemies to hide information from us. Politicians and the media demanding absolute answers before the smoke had even cleared has contributed to this mess and the administration stepped in it by trying to answer questions they did not have the answers to, instead of saying "We don't have all the facts and until we do, we are not creating further danger by guessing."
So I guess it is fine just lie and say it is the results of a video? How pathetic some of you kool-aid drinkers are!
Nice try at condemning the leadership of the other party again Mike but you are blinded by your biased assumptions before all the facts are even in. This is an ongoing investigation with classified information still arriving, and what will be released will be. This is due to the protection and security of Americans here and abroad now, get it???
You are beginning to look like an emotionally disturbed rwnutjob. Your logic is lacking. The video hypothesis was one of many information factors still coming in as a possible reason and contribution to the motivation for the attack in the midst of many reports to examine at the time. That is okay Mike, getting many different bits of information in on an ongoing event is okay, it is not written in a nanosecond for eternity in stone...motives, reasons and knowledge of events change in time with fresh evidence in the real world. It also works that way in legal cases but it seems all you finger pointers here from Republicanland don't know that either.
Now I understand why President Obama has to waste so much time explaining things to Republicans. Sheesh!
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies that left the US Blind and Deaf to the Events leading up to the 9/11 2001 Attacks, Cut to the Bone Reduction In Forces of the US Military that would normally independently verify Intelligence Agency Information becoming Actionable Intelligence. US must rely on information (not even intelligence) from Potentially Hostile Nations like Jordan, Pakistan, etc. that have their own Agendas. US Allies refuse the US access to their Intelligence Assets for fear of compromise.
US Congressional 9/11 Commission (Committee) Investigations, Findings and Recommendations, with former President Clinton, "I'm a so sorry".
Iraq: 2003 Operation Iraqis Freedom from President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655, "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" Justification Section 2 Weapons of Mass Destruction, Section 3 US Policy Overthrow President Hussein.
9/11 2001 Attacks. October 2001 US Military Asymmetric Warfare Forces attached to CIA's SAD/SOG go into Afghanistan to Overthrow the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government for providing Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada with Islamic Sanctuary and support to plan, conduct the 9/11 2001 Attacks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arxKhJIjIiY
2001 Operation Viking Hammer, the elimination of the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban, Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada, Islamic Jihadists that escaped from Afghanistan on the Old Silk Road to Northern Iraq and renamed themselves Ansar Al Islam.
2002 Operation Hotel Calfornia Attacking, Seizing, Securing of the Iraqis Chemical Weapons Facility at Sargat Iraq.
Anita-2036926, Anonymous Insight,
Your ignorance is ignorance; no right to believe anything can be derived from it. - Sigmund Freud
David, this isolated and unfounded statement is bs...
"President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies that left the US Blind and Deaf to the Events leading up to the 9/11 2001 Attacks"
How could this be if we all knew back then that Clinton knew about Osama Bin Laden and the problems coming from that quarter. How could this be when we all knew that Clinton did warn Bush 2 of the obvious terrorist threats, or do you not remember? There had already been an attempt to blow up the twin towers. The rest of all that you have listed is history and unfortunately, the consequences of not taking the proper clever and preventative measures. Unfortunately Bin Laden was not taken out by a drone under Clinton's watch, why did they not continue to track bin Laden and his guys? Bush 2 took the bait after the towers went down and many lives have been lost as a consequence in the domino effect of the path of defensive and retaliatory tactical military operations since. You have simply listed operations like so many trophys and stated the obvious. So have I. What is so ignorant about that?
We all know repeatedly throughout human history that war is mass murder and that war is hell. War is chaos and war is humanity's most ultimate tragic and embarrassing failure at maintaining peace and a civilized society.
My own words.
Anonymous Insight,
Pathetic, Anonymous Insight, were you at D.C..
Read post#4.17 and 4.18.
That was 1993 over 7 years before, a White Van parked in the garage, the screwup was that it was too far away from one of the support columns.
Anonymous Insight - Unfortunately Bin Laden was not taken out by a drone under Clinton's watch
Was NOT MQs (armed Drones), after the 1993 First World Trade Center Bombing, US Ally Saudi Arabia apprehended Osama Bin Laden, and offered President Clinton extradiction, President Clinton refused. US Ally Saudi Arabia then asked for evidence of Osama Bin Laden's involvement with the 1993 First World Trade Center Bombing, President Clinton refused to provide the evidence. Without sufficent evidence US Ally Saudi Arabia released Osama Bin Laden. US Military Asymmetric Warfare Teams (as Snipers) attached to the CIA's SAD/SOG shadowed Osama Bin Laden, and request President Clinton to authorize the Termination of Osama Bin Laden, so that the Teams can go home. President Clinton refuses and cites the US No Assassination Policy. Many of the Islamic Nations refused to give Osama Bin Laden Islamic Sanctuary, Libya even offers to locate and capture Osama Bin Laden and give him to the US. Eventually, the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government of Afghanistan give Osama Bin Laden and Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada Islamic Sanctuary. With the Full Support of the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government of Afghanistan as backed by the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran, Osama Bin Laden and Fundamentalist Islamic Al Quada start the planning of the 9/11 2001 Attacks. Because of President Clinton's previous Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies there are no Afghan Intelligence Assets, so the US does not even know where at Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden and Al Quada are located or even what he is up to. The US Asymmetric Warfare Teams cannot even get into Afghanistan, as the former US Afghan Intelligence Assets without US Funding have become Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government Counter Intelligence Agents, it was like attempting to get into North Korea undetected.
They are NOT "trophys" they are what I survived and many of us did not. I am not going to list all the sights, sounds, emotions, opinions, etc., those are Facts of Events.
Until you can kill without hesitation with extreme prejudice, and only those that needed to be killed, then do Humanitarian Assistance; then tell me about War. Your own words prove that you have never been in the recent Wars.
"Was NOT MQs (armed Drones)" thanks for the details and clarification on this david. I remember reading some years ago that they were being watched from the sky and could have been bombed but were not. I am sure there are others who can verify, add to or rebut your details above. Peace is a wonderful and wise achievement for many on this planet. Europe knew, but America had no clue when this started and it was then creeping our way. Living in Europe, it was very frustrating and frightening to watch it grow. It grew from propaganda and misinformation of what America was like, not countered by anyone who knew better because there was no one who could stop those rumors, notions and beliefs from spreading amongst people who had never set foot upon American soil. There were no Americans over there to argue back for one thing. Those who visited were never around long enough to catch on or hear the private remarks behind their backs. Most were tourists passing through on summer vacations, never wandering from their planned itineraries, never acculturated or speaking the local lingo or living in the back neighborhoods or following the native customs. Most were out having fun and did not really care about or appreciate the native customs. For those with family or who stayed long enough, the differences were cultural, but those barriers to understanding and communication can be overcome in time with genuine interest and effort to learn the ways of other cultures. After seeing war, living oppression, getting around corruption, suffering betrayal, and feeling the pain...most people prefer working toward the alternative which is ultimately the prize of peace which offers a more comfortable life.
Peace is also a health issue beyond politics and it has to be worked on to keep around. Here is to your continued survival and hopefully more of a heavenly experience on earth. Of course, it is up to each of us to create peace and our survival from our thoughts to our actions by way of our motives. Thus the saying, "Let there be Peace and let it begin with me". This never guarantees that a wandering Kagyu will not be beaten in China, or an Indian Sadhu could not be beaten down by an English soldier, or a diplomat, leader or celebrity will not be attacked by thugs. Sometimes there is no choice and defense is necessary as we know. The hope is that we can manage this planet in a way that eliminates this violence and pain for as many as possible. Many of us work that way, in the field, as you say in the humanitarian fields...nurses, teachers, dentists, farmers, or builders.
Perhaps Clinton was working this way too in the nineties when he decided against the consequences of an aggressive and irreversible attack on Bin Laden at that point, especially if it might fail, as it did with Iran years before in Carter's time. He would be the best reference on that and this is all complex and too long a topic to continue here. Again, this is not about me and I will not be judged or assumed or pegged or defined when discussing a general topic. I was simply stating what I observed in your listings and comments above before you offered more information.
david-475776. If you read my post @ 3.32 I almost say the same exact thing about Clinton's Golden opportunity to get Bin Laden in 1999 but wasted his chance even after the 1993 bombing of the towers the first time. If he had taken him out in 1999, 9/11/2001 probably never would have happened. Good post of yours though.
Whether or not it was pre-planned, opportunistic or the result of the damned video - what is and was known was that someone(s) attacked the consulate in Benghazi, said person(s) used weapons and killed Americans. Can we agree to this point? That said - it is an act of terrorism and that much could and should have been expressed at that time. The rest of it can and hopefully will be explained later on. Republicans are and Democrats should be enraged that this administration did not immediately call it what it was irregardless of the reasoning behind it. NOBODY brings RPG's or OTHER MILITARY GRADE WEAPONS to a protest UNLESS they are planning violence. Do you honestly believe that those that stormed the Consulate either just happened to have these weapons handy? OR that while there were protesters there at the Consulate these people ran home to retrieve these weapons?
Kathey, nice analysis. Well thought out. Flagged, and Fanned.
Eric-913730
E'hhhhhhhhh Special Opps had Bin Laden dead in their sights, and President Bill Clinton while soiling a Blue dress told them to stand down. Thats a bit of a trump cars over you contention about The Last Presidnet not doing anything about Bin Laden. If Clinton had done something when it was brought to his atttention The Twin Towers still would be standing.
Rancho* Great post. My posts @ 3.32 and 13.8 supports exactly what you say, and it is fact. Again great post.
Be a good drinking game Monday night, every time Obama changes his story you take a drink. The audience would black out.
My old man had a saying, much like many of our fathers:
"Excuses are like azzholoes, every body's got one".
How about playing that game every time Romney changes his story? The audience would be suffering from alcohol poisoning.
I can deal with a story change.
It's the "theme of the book change" we're worried about.
Furball It is Robme that is the habitual lair . Him and Lyin Ryan. Weep weep weep!
Romney is mentally ill. Ann R has entioned hs menu health twice now.. He should be tested. Risky!
Disgusted Conservative. I heard that same statement you gave in your 5.1 post from a Navy Chief, and I agree. But he had a caveat. He said for except me, because he had rectal cancer and had it sewn shut and had a colostomy bag instead. He was a really cool guy.
This is all political hogwash. After the election, the Republicans will drop Benghazi like a hot potato. The Republicans think, for some odd reasons, that the President and State Department are supposed to mind them on every single request. Silly kids!
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
The American public can deal with the occasional fault, it's human nature.
What we cannot stomach are repeated errors, cover ups, and excuses. What we have here is a pattern. A man incapable of leadership. An administration with blood and failure on their hands.
Thanks again to the mainstream liberal media for their attempts to help Odumbo out of this mess...
Wow DC, if you add lies, that is a very good description of the Bush 2 administration! We Dems were all disgusted too.
"What we cannot stomach are repeated errors, cover ups, and excuses. What we have here is a pattern. A man incapable of leadership. An administration with blood and failure on their hands." Thanks DC for your attempt to describe the wrong bunch. Can we say projection? Hmmm.
Actually, why don't you apply those words to those in control of the securities budget, The Republican majority in the House of Representatives who voted against the funding to make stronger securities possible. They, the Republicans, said they had to prioritize things, things? You mean People, right? NOT! When it comes to credibility you lose the case again, and you are out there with your pointy fingers on the sidelines yapping about what you would do...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
What errors, coverups or excuses..? "you people" need to use a reliable news source Not Faux entertainment show
Republicans have more balls that a herd of bull elephants - the animal that symbolizes that party. Lack of security? Perhaps, but which political party insisted on reducing the embassy and consulate security budgets by over $300 million?
The article clearly states that the budget cuts were not the reason for lack of security at this particular embassy. Did you read the article?
Yes, we read the article sparklystar, but Republicans need to stop politicising this tragedy because,
#1. It is not a partisan issue it is an American defence and security issue.
#2. Stop putting this president in a vacuum, there is a big government around him with many divisions, people and posts and Obama did not have anything to do with how the members of Congress voted.
It is still a fact that members of Congress including many Republicans, voted wrong on making sure there were enough funds for sufficient security abroad at our stations for our diplomats. In this case singular human error only goes so far, there were many involved in this, none of them directly in touch with President Obama at the time.
Stop the blame gaming and President bashing. It just does not apply here. The investigation is still ongoing. Unfortunately the losses cannot be undone.
Romney/Ryan et al.!!! Will you Republicans please respect the families of the deceased as they have requested and back off your pathetic attempted accusations of ineptitude and your ill mannered disrespect of the President. It is not Obama's fault if he catches Romney in a lie, or Biden's if he catches Ryan in one either during these debates. No one needs to feel that they need to punch anyone for a statement of a backed up fact and an explanation. This is what debates are for. How else is the public to know unless misinformation is checked openly in a debate? Debate in a public forum is a part of the democratic process inclusive of the witnessing public that participates in the vote on the issue or for the candidate.
Get your facts straight,
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/rulings/promise-kept/
and go vote FOR YOUR BEST INTERESTS & YOUR BEST FUTURE. hint...your best interests are if you make over $250,000 a year with offshore accounts and abroad incomes, go for Romney/Ryan, otherwise you had better stick with the continued slow and sure rebuilding of our broad based middle class with more local small business opportunities, not monopolies calling themselves small business to avoid taxes, and more fair paying jobs, decent quality goods, and continued collective bargaining with safety in the workplace, minimum wages and rebuilding a decent quality of life in our towns and cities for Americans here...
ObAmA/BiDeN 2012
What did President Obama spend $2.1 Trillion on that was NOT previously Budgeted For, requiring the current Cuts to previously Budgeted for Programs, Projects, and Agencies.
YOU HAVE 30 MINUTES TO POST AN ANSWER BELOW. NO LAME EXCUSES.
Correction required...under Romney...defense spending to spike by 2.1 Trillion.
http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/10/news/economy/romney-defense-spending/index.htm
Anonymous Insight,
What did President Obama spend $2.1 Trillion on that was NOT previously Budgeted For, requiring the current Cuts to previously Budgeted for Programs, Projects, and Agencies.
Your social communication skills are lacking here, david. I do not play with cheats that stack their decks, or ask leading questions. Keep your effing ad infinitums to yourself in your own little riddle game, state your point or make your beef fairly, and by all means, continue to do your own homework. Since you know what angle you are coming from already, why don't you be specific so that others know what you're on about...or is that too hard for YOU to do?
anonymous light, stop politicizing this? Uh....foreign affairs are part of politics. And, dems are doing the same thing when they lie about the incident. This is most definitely a political talking point.
And I do have to agree with your above post regarding David.
Hey morons, why not look at the bigger picture? Who voted to cut spending for the embassies? Are you so ignorant that you can't see what the Republican Party has been doing for the last 4 years? Why do you wake only up when something tragic happens and then start pointing fingers? At this time in American history why would someone even suggest we cuts spending for these government officials? Again we have Congress doing nothing to help solve our problems but pointing fingers when something goes wrong. SHAME ON ALL OF YOU!
Budget cuts were not a problem when it came to spending money on chargers for green cars and gala events to promote green energy. If they had the money for these types of things, then they should have had the money for increased security. It was not the budget cuts two years ago that caused the problem, it was the wrong priorities NOW that they need to answer for.
Exactly my point too Jennilee, be sure to go ask the Republicans that voted down funding for better safety and security of humans at our bases, consulates, and embassies in the House and why they had such weird priorities, meaning specifically, saving Mammon over saving THE SOURCE OF REAL WEALTH, living Human resources.
Now as for clean, green, nonpolluting, renewable energy sources, I am all for that on behalf of the continued good health of my children and my children's children. Aren't you?
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
Did you people even read the article? Lack of funding was not the reason there was a shortage of security at this particular embassy. And acutally, quite a few of the democrats voted with the republicans.
sparklystar,
US Consulate (Benghazi), not US Embassy (Tripoli).
I think by now everyone here has gotten the point about government posts, decisions, votes, function, blame games, politicising, partisanship, labeling, funding, human error, miscommunications and all the factors that have to do with this ongoing tragic event. Its been repeated many times now, but as Carville did say, it still and always will be in a larger sense... the economy stupid...interesting about this 2.1 trillion thing...
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/04/960551/romney-debate-military-spending/?mobile=nc
Barry sorry to see you are offended that you failed again and as a matter of course lied about it
I am offended that you are hiding behind coffins of the people you are responsible for killing due to your continuing incompetence and deceit.
Look, the president doesnt have time for all this nonsense and speculation. He has more important things to do and an agenda to carry out. It is important for him to separate this sort of thing from taking up his time and efforts. Not only that, he most continue his actions that grow his mystique and reputation of being cool and aloof. He has stated his attitude towards our people and they must have some risk in their effort to show the public that the risks are not important when measured by the standards that impress foreign nationals of our aloofness in response to these kinds of situations. It is not that the president doesnt care, but he cannot let caring overide the basic responsibilities of showing people in these countries how open minded and accepting he is.
Wow, a new level for tongue-in-cheek!
So true!
Did you guys forget this thing called Congress? They do important things too.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
Please remember the $300 billion cut from "security" was voted for and passed by Democrats as well as Republicans and signed into law by the President of the United States. Since in testimony money was not the reason for lack of security it should be a dead issue. Again the Congress is made up of the Senate (Democrat majority) and House (Republican majority) and President Obama (Democrat). If Partisanship is the issue 2/3 of the process was owned by the Democrats. By the way Anonymous huffingtonpost is more than a tad left...even NPR would give you a better rounded picture of events and they did.
So now tell me again who is responsible for what?
Vote out ALL the incumbents in 2012 for real change and hope.
Notsosure10,
Wait till all of US Ambassador Stevens Documents, Reports, etc. come out, that will shut off Anonymous Insight diarrhea.
So, from what you keep saying about diarrhea, in your own words, it appears that you think you are the only one who has a right to poop on this planet? I think we're getting to the problem of your pathological and closed minded attitudinal set. I have already made all statements about that above and do not claim to have all the answers, so stop repeating your big letters, playing riddle games, jumping conclusions, attacking and pegging people before you even know anything yourself.
Great bluffing tho...we all know about hateful rtwingnutjob blame games and as mentioned before, we all know that this is not over, but if it makes you feel good, keep on spewing your filthy images in the glass house on your public forum until it gets so inflamatory it blows up and goes poof! LOL!!!
American girl . are you seriously quoting Vladimir Putin " Obama is an honest man" ...That is one of the biggest reaches for praise ever .
That's because American girl is flat out just a stupid bitch.She better find a job, 'cause when her messiah is gone she won't get her freebies any longer.
Another story that shows reelecting Obama condemns our country to suicide by Obama.
What is Romney looking for? Nothing but a distraction from his own inept foreign policy exposure (note his visit to Europe where he took the time to insult all of his hosts - our friends). If there was a clear request for more security - to an office in the State department, perhaps we should fire someone publicly. No... I am not suggesting Hillary because I doubt the vague communique that is currently being manipulated by the Republican losers was reviewed above the office where it was received.
Perhaps a more level, more presidential response would be to get all the answers before acting. gee, maybe that's what our President is doing. Ya think?
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
Yeah, I'll jump right on that.... NOT!
Paranoid conspiracy theorists are nothing more than empty shells bereft of providing a meaningful contribution to society so let's make stuff up and watch the other empty shells lap it up.
Sorry,but this is just a little too conveinient for me.Right before the debate this is released,yeah right !! And isn't Issa a Republican ?? Lies,lies,lies just for the sake of what ???? This is ridiculous,have they no shame ?? The Repubs vote to cut spending and then bitch when this happens !!
Believe me one party does not own the real estate on lies...both of them have serious investments there.
I don't know what makes Republican lawmakers think that they have a right to publicize the details of a deadly attack on our nation while the investigation is still ongoing. WTF? Don't you know the POTUS is not going to publicize details because they will hinder the investigation. You people are so short-sighted and small minded that it's mind boggling. It's 11 years after 9/11/01 and we are still learning new details. Eff off. You people are such a joke.
Investigation's pretty much wrapped-up, chick.
End of story
That laundry list could have been written by Lyin Ryan himself, especially since your overlooked a really important point- Ryan voted against increased embassy security.
Disgusted Con IS NOW DISSED IN STONE and mirrored by own personal MEDUSA, therefore, not credible. So true Diane, it seems the Republicans in the House of Representatives had important things to do like all of them and their guy Ryan with the big doe eyes and pointy fingers continuing this blabber after being asked to stop by the families of the deceased, and yet it was Ryan and the Republican majority in the House who did the actual voting against increased embassy or consulate security some months ago. Of course we have it in the news already...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html
Can you imagine the mismanagement and mistakes if this uninformed, contradictory and confused bunch got back in again after eight years of Bush 2??? YIKES!
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!
.I don't care if you're a democrat or a republican you MUST watch the 2016 movie before you vote!!!! LIFE CHANGING! This movie truly should be watched by both parties!!!!
Everything will become eerily clear as the direction of our country we all love...well most!!!!
Once you watch it..you will be doing the same thing I'm doing now!!!! Guaranteed!!!!
Diane,
Just for you a re-post with a small civics lesson attached.
Please remember the $300 billion cut from "security" was voted for and passed by Democrats as well as Republicans and signed into law by the President of the United States. Since in testimony money was not the reason for lack of security it should be a dead issue. Again the Congress is made up of the Senate (Democrat majority) and House (Republican majority) and President Obama (Democrat). If Partisanship is the issue 2/3 of the process was owned by the Democrats. By the way Anonymous huffingtonpost is more than a tad left...even NPR would give you a better rounded picture of events and they did.
So now tell me again who is responsible for what?
Vote out ALL the incumbents in 2012 for real change and hope.
GOP Rep Issa released documents without give the FBI/CIA/StateDept a chance to redact the names of Libyans working with the U.S. government and thus endangering the safety of US operatives. AWESOME!
Sound familiar? Valerie Plame ring a bell?
Typical GOP cr@ss behavior. Yeah, this is the class of clowns we want running this great nation. It'll be a GIANT circus act, from the top down.
Good lord help us.
Are you forgetting the four Americans killed because of this administration?
Blame someone else its not my fault. That seems to be the phrase of choice from the white house and on these boards.
Still, it's predictable.