US pledges to aid Beirut bomb probe amid Lebanon violence

Hussam Shebaro / Reuters

A Sunni Muslim gunman with a weapon rides a motorcycle through the streets of Kaskas in Beirut, Monday, after a night of tension.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has pledged to help Lebanon investigate Friday's deadly car bombing in Beirut, as parts of the city were engulfed in violence that some observers say heralds the spread of civil war from neighboring Syria. 

She spoke with Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati on Sunday to reiterate U.S. condemnation of the attack - which killed intelligence chief Brig. Gen. Wissam al-Hassan - calling it "heinous", State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said.


"The secretary emphasized the United States' firm commitment to Lebanon's stability, independence, sovereignty and security," Nuland said in a statement.

PhotoBlog: Tension on Beirut streets as political crisis deepens

"She noted the importance of political leaders working together at this sensitive time to ensure that calm prevails and that those responsible for the attack are brought to justice,” the statement said.

Protesters rushed the prime minister's office Sunday in Lebanon, ripping up barbed wire and hurling rocks. The situation, which started as a peaceful protest, has become a standoff between protesters and the military. It has also triggered concern that Syria's civil war is spreading. NBC's Stephanie Gosk reports.

Nuland said Clinton and Mikati agreed that the United States "would provide assistance in the investigation of the bombing."

Syria blamed by Lebanese opposition
Opposition leaders and their supporters accuse Syria of being behind Friday's attack, and say Mikati is too close to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his Lebanese ally Hezbollah, which is part of Mikati's government.

Thousands turned out Sunday in downtown Beirut's Martyrs' Square for Hassan's funeral, which also served as a political rally. Violence erupted after an opposition leader demanded that Mikati step down to pave the way for talks on the crisis.

"The Syrian regime started a war against us and we will fight this battle until the end," said Anthony Labaki, a 24-year-old physiotherapist.

Mahmoud Zayyat / AFP - Getty Images

Huge blast explodes in a central Beirut street injures dozens, kills at least eight.

Sunday's clashes fed into a growing political crisis in Lebanon linked to the conflict in neighboring Syria. Israeli news site Haaretz reported that the clashes "raised the specter of the nation once again becoming torn apart by civil war."

A group marched to the prime minister's office, then overturned barriers, pulled apart barbed wire coils and threw steel rods, stones and bottle at soldiers and police.

Security forces responded by shooting into air and firing teargas, forcing the protesters to scatter.

"Lebanon is in the eye of the storm," said Fawaz A. Gerges, head of the Middle East Center at the London School of Economics. "The fact that the protesters came close to storming the parliament shows how deep the crisis of the state is and how weak the leadership has become."

Fire exchanged in southern Beirut
On Sunday night, gunmen armed with rifles and rocket-propelled grenades exchanged fire in southern districts of Beirut, security sources told Reuters, and residents could hear the sound of ambulance sirens.

There were no immediate reports of casualties from the clashes in the capital, but in the northern city of Tripoli a 9-year-old girl was killed by a sniper and several people were wounded in clashes.

PhotoBlog: Violence erupts in Beirut after slain official's funeral

Gunmen have been patrolling the streets in Tripoli, scene of previous clashes between Sunnis and Alawites sympathetic to different sides in the Syria war.

Opposition leader Saad al-Hariri urged supporters to refrain from any more violence.

"We want peace, the government should fall but we want that in a peaceful way. I call on all those who are in the streets to pull back," Hariri said on the Future Television channel.

Sectarian tensions
Sunday's events highlighted how the 19-month-old uprising against Assad has sharpened deep-seated sectarian tensions in Lebanon, which is still scarred from its 1975-90 civil war.

Sunni-led rebels are fighting to overthrow Assad, who is from the Alawite minority, which has its roots in Shiite Islam. Lebanon's religious communities are divided between those that support Assad and those that back the rebels.

Hassan, 47, was a senior intelligence official who had helped uncover a bomb plot that led to the arrest and indictment in August of a pro-Assad former Lebanese minister.

A Sunni Muslim, he also led an investigation that implicated Syria and the Shiite Hezbollah in the 2005 assassination of Rafik al-Hariri, a former prime minister of Lebanon.

Damascus and Hezbollah have condemned Hassan's killing.

NBC's Paul Nassar describes the scene after a bomb killed 8 people in Lebanon Friday.

But mourners at Martyrs' Square on Sunday accused Syria of involvement and called for Mikati to quit. One banner read "Go, go Najib" echoing the slogans of the Arab Spring.

"We came for Lebanon's future," said mourner Rama Fakhouri, an interior designer. "And to show that we will not be scared."

Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More world stories from NBC News:

Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

yep, help Lebanon, but didn't care to much of our four people in Benghazi, clinton and obama both should be in prison right now, they have to much American blood on their hands.

  • 23 votes
#1 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:08 AM EDT

Michael.....This Administration is the most idiotic, insensitive group of dolts in our countrys' history. Aside from the Increase in U.S. Poverty, Social Welfare Programs and Apologies to the World , what the hell have they accomplished in 3+ years??? And, I can guarantee you, SOME LIBERAL idiot will post a stream of "accomplishments" by the Obama Administration that will include things that would have happened even if these clowns had taken a permanent vacation for their entire terms of Office.

  • 14 votes
#1.1 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:22 AM EDT

"Clinton and Mikati agreed that the United States "would provide assistance in the investigation of the bombing.""

Looking at the report I am wondering whether Hillary is sane! She appears to have removed Lebanon's past history, Somalia and recent most disgraceful Benghazi killings from her memory.

She dances as Jewish lobby wants. Otherwise, she talks nonsense and acts like an idiot.

Just wait for Hillary and Bill's dances to start in 2016 for Presidential bid! She has collected enough Sunni Saudis, oil companies, Jewish and lobbyists support for big dances and dramas!

  • 7 votes
#1.2 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:02 AM EDT

Michael, you post on EVERY foreign event news story and blame Obama. Every last one. You are no different here, except now you add Clinton. Many around the world think G. Bush should be tried and imprisoned for invading Iraq and misleading the international community on WMDs.

As for the moderate who expects someone to post Obama's accomplishments, what do you expect when you make a stupid statement like:

what the hell have they accomplished in 3+ years???

I'm not going to bother posting the lengthy list, because it would be a waste of my time. I will say that blaming Obama for a spontaneous terrorist attack in Libya is nothing more than an attempt to gain political points. As the economy continues to improve and jobless numbers come down, Republicans have had to look elsewhere to attack Obama and a militant group of several hundred have given them their gift. They won't bother to acknowledge that it was their budget bill that stripped $300 million dollars from the State Department for embassy and diplomatic security.

Michael knows full well a full investigation is underway on the Libyan incident, led by Issa in the House and McCain in the Senate. The CIA and FBI are also involved in the investigation.

  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:03 AM EDT

You trolls just keep up spreading you BS go somewhere else with it. There was nothing wrong with the way the response was handled at all. Information that you claim should have been available was not at the time everyone spoke. All you are doing is aiding the enemy with this political attack. During the wars in Afghanistan and iraq the same things happened but were dismissed as being just what happens in a war zone. Seems you right wingers have bought into AlQuedas attempt to influence our election and rid themselves of the Person kicking theri butts calle Obama.

  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:08 AM EDT

So, now we'll be paying for this countries troubles, just friggen great....Old fatface Billary can lie with the best of them....

  • 9 votes
#1.5 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:47 AM EDT

Michael: Obama and Clinton in prison.............??????????? Really???????????

  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:59 AM EDT

WHY ?

    #1.7 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:56 AM EDT

    Christ - what does it take to convince morons that this administration has only one demonstrable foreign policy - appease and kiss the ass of muslims no matter their political predisposition. Some of you friggin people make me sick. Hillary emphasized " the United States firm committment to Lebanons stability, independence, soveriegnity and security". Translation - She and her boss committ our nation to support a nation controlled by Hezbollah and fundamentalists that send hundreds of rockets into Israel every year, sends drones over Israel, infllitrate armed groups to murder little kids and old men, and are armed and funded by Iran that has vowed to destroy Israel AND us and is on the threshold of having nuclear weapons that will possibly pull the world into WW3 in the middle East. People like Giantego and Ray in Jax are typical left-wing droids that would support the idiots we have in Washington no matter how many Americans get butchered. Ray in Jax - Blaming Obama for the terrorist attacks in Libya that resulted from the total, complete stupidity of Hillary and the Obama administrations policy of appeasment is just to "score political points". Tell to the mothers of the dead! What total idiots - ant they vote no less! As for seeing Obama and Clinton in prison, "I would rather see them both move to a country with people that think just like them - maybe the Sudan.

    • 5 votes
    #1.8 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:12 AM EDT

    Yep. They are that stupid. I'd just like to see 'em dropped in the Sudan desert.

    • 1 vote
    #1.9 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:35 AM EDT

    My, my. Is "Ray in Jax that stupid ? I think yes.

    Is "Giantego" that stupid too ? I think yes.

    • 3 votes
    #1.10 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:39 AM EDT

    None of this makes sense. Whether one likes the Syrians or not, there have been multiple suicide and simple car bombs in Syria. No doubt the Syrians believe these were channeled cross border with the active or passive support of Lebanon and or Turkey - so why would we not investigate those? In principle, suicide/car bombings are terrorist acts no matter where they occur. If the US objects to this one in Beirut they should also object to those anywhere else. Moral ambiguity is very dangerous as it justifies anything for anyone under any circumstance. Basically one mans terrorist act is another mans fight for freedom. There have to be bounds. This is the kind of thing that turns on us and bites us.

    • 1 vote
    #1.11 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:48 AM EDT

    The United States of Israel always wants to help in these bomb probes and anyone can guess who they will find guilty. Just more propaganda to further their agenda. Wesley Clark, 7 Countries in 5 Years. That Simple.

    • 1 vote
    #1.12 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:51 AM EDT

    Sandman: You would find a role for Israel even if this article was about global warming. By doing so now, you have exposed yourself for who you really are. How about blaming Muslim on Muslim violence for a change. Interethnic violence among the Muslims has existed since the begining of time. The Arabs' hatred of the Jewish State has never been strong enough to prevent the bloody rivalries that repeatedly rocked the Middle East. These conflicts were evident in the civil wars in Yemen and Lebanon, as well as in the war between Iraq and Iran, in the gassing of countless Kurds in Iraq, and in the killing of Iraqis by Iraqis, Syrians by Syrians as well as the killing of Egyptians by Egyptians. Are you going to blame the Jews and Israel for that too?

    • 2 votes
    #1.13 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:07 AM EDT

    As much as the People of the United States would like to have Piece around the world especially in he middle east. Our priority's need to change!

    1. How can our government change the thinking of peoples that have acted like this for thousands of years. It wont happen! not in our life time. I did not see Mohammad come from the sky and burst out to hurt people and the one that are, they are doing it on there own. This killing for religious purpose is nonsense.

    I know there and peaceful people in the Muslim world, but they are the 2%. We need to get out of there let the crazy people kill them self's and try to work with the people left behind the survive there own fanatic's.

    Will this happen in my lifetime NO! I doubt it! there is righteous people who care then there are self righteous people who kill. Until a higher power comes from the sky, Mohammad, Jesus, buda ect.. you'd better be happy with the live you have.

    I'm getting sick of seeing the violence of these peolpe in the name of religion!

    Thats my 2 cents for today!

    • 1 vote
    #1.14 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:07 AM EDT

    BUTT OUT

    We cannot afford this anymore. President Obama spent $2.1 Trillion that was not previously Budgeted for, requring the Cuts to the previously Budgeted For Programs, Projects, Agencies.

    ALL of you Demoncraps demanding this or not stopping YOUR insanity at YOUR Expense Fly to Beirut AND provide YOUR own Security. If you get killed, injured, wounded, US will deny your very existance.

    No matter who you determine did the bombing, everyone will be accusing YOU of taking sides and demand your execution.

    Ray in Jax,

    YOU NEED TO GET OVER YOURSELF.

    1. President Bush is NOT the US President anymore.

    2. Iraq: President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655, "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" Justification Section 2 Weapons of Mass Destruction, Section 3 US Policy Overthrow of Presidnet Hussein; with US Congressional Appropriations As Operation Iraqis Freedom. THAT IS WHAT GOT THE US INTO WAR WITH IRAQ and the US Senate's 2002 Iraqi War Resolution, making Iraq meet the criteria for a Declared War, with Both Houses Declaring War. It is also US Congress' Responsibility to find the Money for the US Laws they Create, as US Congressional Appropriations, not the US President.

    3. The ONLY ILLEGAL UNFUNDED WAR, was President Obama's Libya, in DIRECT Violation of US Law, that LIMITS and RESTRICTS the US Presidential War Powers, 1973 War Powers Resolution (Act), this is an Impeachable Offense. President Obama did NOT notify Both Houses of US Congress 48 Hours before ANY US Military Actions, because US Congress was not notified they did not have time to write a US Law (therefore ILLEGAL) with US Congressional Appropriations (therefore UNFUNDED) to cover President Obama's arse. So without US Congressional Appropriations, President Obama used not Budgeted For Discretionary Spending.

    4. It is President Obama's Proposal to US Congress, to chop the previously Budgeted For Entitlements for US Citizens (the 47%), the Agencies that manage those, etc.; as Govenor Romulan is not President.

    5. Due to President Obama as Commander In Chief Ordered current Reduction In Forces of the US Military of 90,000 US Military thrown on Unemployment further straining the Veterans Affairs (Administration), and throwing 108,000 US Civilians employed by the US Military; YOU provide your own Security at Beirut as well as pay for yourself to get there. Doing what President Obama as Commander In Chief has done (wrong, left, actions for the situations), and failed to do (right actions for the situations) now the Less than 1% of US Citizens of the US Military are Deployed more often for longer tours, while CHICKEN HAWK DEMONCRAPS get the US Military involved with more situations (President Obama's Secret Wars) and (DEMONCRAP SOS Clinton) demands the US Military be involved in United Nations Missions as the World Police.

    • 2 votes
    #1.15 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:13 AM EDT

    That was my first thought Michael as I read the headline....so when will they get there mid November?

      #1.16 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:14 AM EDT

      There are fairly clear reasons for the inter-ethnic violence. Unlike nation-states in Europe, modern Lebanese, Jordanian, Syrian, and Iraqi nationalities did not evolve. They were arbitrarily created by colonial powers.

      In 1919, in the wake of World War I, England and France as Mandatories (e.g., official administrators and mentors) carved up the former Ottoman Empire, which had collapsed a year earlier, into geographic spheres of influence. This divided the Mideast into new political entities with new names and frontiers.

      Territory was divided along map meridians without regard for traditional frontiers (i.e., geographic logic and sustainability) or the ethnic composition of indigenous populations. The prevailing rationale behind these artificially created states was how they served the imperial and commercial needs of their colonial masters. Iraq and Jordan, for instance, were created as emirates to reward the noble Hashemite family from Saudi Arabia for its loyalty to the British against the Ottoman Turks during World War I, under the leadership of Lawrence of Arabia. Iraq was given to Faisal bin Hussein, son of the sheriff of Mecca, in 1918. The manner in which European colonial powers carved out political entities with little regard to their ethnic composition not only led to this inter-ethnic violence, but it also encouraged dictatorial rule as the only force capable of holding such entities together.

      • 2 votes
      #1.17 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:29 AM EDT

      Basil Romeo,

      Who cares, most of the current citizens of these Nations do not even learn their own History and only the Islamic condoned or sanctioned History.

      The how many people at these Nations are still alive from those times.

      What is creating, causing, continuing this mess, is simple: Fundamentalist Islam as the Majority of Islam's over 1.5 Billion Islamic Believers Worldwide.

      Their Fundamentalist Islamic strict adherence to the Holy Koran (Quran) as Law, Fundamentalist Islam Shia (Sharia) Laws, Hadith (Ancient Islamic Customs) Laws; and the 109 Suras of the 114 Suras of the Holy Koran (Quran) Calls to All Islamic Believers to War Against the Christians, Jews, Unbelievers.

      Fundamentalist Islam being run Worldwide by the Ayatollahs of the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran.

      President Obama's 2009 Iran Policies, as seen by the Ayatollahs of the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran as President Obama negotiating ("empty words") from a position of Defeat (Farsi actual translation was US Defeated, not weakness). The Ayatollahs of the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran increase their Overt and Covert Activities against the US and US Allies as Fully Supported by their Allies the Chinese and Russian Federation. Especially, the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran's Special Forces, Quds, training, arming, funding the Holy Warriors of Islam (Islamic Jihadists) Worldwide to Overthrow US Allies Established Governments, at Egypt (Muslim Brotherhood), Libya (Libyan Islamic Fighting Group), Somalia (Al Sheebah), Iraq (Islamic Shia Insurgency), Gaza (Army of Islam), Palestine (Worldwide Hamas Foreign Fighters), Chenhen Foreign Fighters, Hezbollah (Worldwide Foreign Fighters), Al Quada International Franchises, etc..

      • 3 votes
      #1.18 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:04 PM EDT

      David, I agree, but in this part of the world we (West) must look to the antecedents in order to understand the current situation because the Muslims' espouse a medieval form of jurisprudence that the Christians and Jews have long abandoned. It is also important for the more temperate and educated Muslims to know this history so that they may educate all those poor, parochial, and disenfranchised Muslims who have fallen prey to the hateful Mullahs and Ayatollahs. Knowledged of history in this region is, indeed very important, but mostly so to the current and future generations of Muslims who will know nothing other than strapping homicide belts to their waists.

        #1.19 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:19 PM EDT

        Wow and more wow -- sending help with what $$$$???? We are BROKE, doesn't this admin get it??? Where's the story on Joe/James Biden?? Oh the "fair and balanced" MSNBC crowd wouldn't want their drone's heads to explode because there is NO WAY to defend this:

        How was it that HillStone, a newcomer in the business of home building, landed a massive and potentially lucrative contract to build 100,000 homes in war-torn Iraq?

        Richter didn’t mince words. It really helps, he said, to have “the brother of the vice president as a partner,” according to a person who was present.

        The “brother” Richter was referring to during the meeting is James Biden, the younger brother of Vice President Joe Biden.

        More taxpayer $$$ going to line this admins corrupt pockets. As if some of this money isn't going to magically land on Joe's doorstep. hahahahahahaha corruption exposed -- AGAIN!

          #1.20 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:22 PM EDT

          Basil Romeo,

          Like I stated before, at these Nations it does NOT matter.

          You can keep doing the "Western" Academic Idealism, and the Colonial Guilt (also long before any current "Westerners" were even born, failed attempt to make later generations feel guilty for what their long deceased ancient ancestors did). Still has NO Effect on the Current Situations.

          Who cares why the Islamic Nation of Iraq was actually three separate distinct people; the failure was that the US and US Allies did not recognize this, NOT the failure to understand the Why (Ancient History).

          You try to teach actual History at an Islamic Nation, that is like attempting to tell people at the US that their US Politicians lied about recent History (Current Events), especially the Demoncraps that will defend President Obama Wrong or Right to their Deaths. You can see that here on Newsvine, the Demoncraps name calling instead of posting their Facts to dispute the posts.

          example: We (US Military) did not just leave Iraq in accordance with the previous President Bush Iraq Withdrawal Time Table; the US got KICKED OUT OF IRAQ, as after the President Obama Iran Policies, the Ayatollahs of the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran pressured the Islamic Shia Government of Iraq, no more negotiations with SOS Clinton nor President Obama for the US to remain at the Islamic Shia Nation of Iraq. By doing this the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran got the Iraqis Oil for their Allies the Chinese and Russian Federation, also protected the Fundamentalist Islamic Automonous Kurdistanis Region that the Fundamentalist Islamic Shia Republic of Iran's Special Forces, Quds, is training hundreds of thousands of Holy Warriors of Isalm (Islamic Jihadists) at, as funded by Trillions USDs per year from the Mandatory Islamic Tithes, to Overthrow the US Allies Established Governments.

          example: The Demoncrap and President Obama Lie, Iraq as an Illegal Unfunded War started by President Bush (43). Illegal as not supported by a US Law or in violation of a US Law, Unfunded as no US Congressional Appropriations (US Congress responsible for finding money for the US Laws they create, NOT the President's Responsibility); WRONG, President Clinton's US Law, H.R. 4655, "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" with US Congressional Appropriations, and US Senate US Law, 2002 Iraqi War Resolution with US Congressional Appropriations. Demoncraps saying we went to War at Iraq based on a Lie, without realizing that "Lie" was from Demoncrap President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655 Section 2 Weapons of Mass Destruction.

          So you really believe that you can teach Real History at an Islamic Nation (with Laws against doing that) while you can see here on Newsvine, just how much opposition to the Real History there is.

          • 2 votes
          #1.21 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:53 PM EDT

          okay, David, so what do you propose we do instead?

            #1.22 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:06 PM EDT

            In response to Basil; Lebanon might as well have Israel conduct the probe if the US is conducting it, since they are one and the same entity. Everyone in the world outside of the United States and Israel knows that the US is not partisan and that can be easily seen by how Israel has taken the West Bank while the US does not mutter a word, how Netanyahoo is getting all this coverage to influence elections in the US, how the US vetoes EVERY single UN resolution against Israel.

            Please don't act like the US is going to conduct "a fair and balanced" investigation. It would be as close to fair and balanced as Fox News would be to independent news coverage. It seems every time something happens in Lebanon, the US is itching to aid in the investigation to act like they are doing due diligence when everyone in the world (again outside of the US and Israel) knows who they will find guilty.

            It's a good thing Dubai had surveillance cameras to find out it was the Israeli Mossad who killed the Hamas chief (and not suprisingly, everyone involved in the plot, despite being on the Interpol list has not been caught), or else we might believe today that it was a Hamas rival that went to Dubai to carry out the act. I bet had it been successful, the US would have come to the rescue to conduct the investigation yet again.

            The best thing for the US to do with regards to this investigation, would be to stay out, but of course they won't because we all know the hand that controls the US Government. We all know who they will find guilty.

            Wesley Clark, 7 Countries, in 5 years.

            You claim I expose myself for who I really am. Yeah, I am somebody who reads history, about 2500 pages in the last year and see what is shaping up. I will not be intimidated like most other liberals just because I don't take on the Zionist world view like yourself.

            I knew the war in Syria would happen and I knew it would spread to Lebanon before either happened. The only way the United States of Israel is attacking Iran is when the sanctions weaken Iran and Israel has Hezbollah cut off (which requires the downfall of the Assad regime and civil strife in Lebanon). Maybe you should tell your Zionist buddies to stop drinking the End of Days Kool-Aid just because you have the 4th largest nuclear arsenal in the world Basil.

              #1.23 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:19 PM EDT

              Sandman: It's now clear to me that you conducted a selective reading of 2500 pages of history. There are milions of pages of history, depends where you get your information from. Don't bother listing your sources because you know nothing about me and very little about the history of Zionism, or with respect to the latter if you do know something you are selectively culling information to satisfy your biggoted outlook. Certainly the Mossad has carried out operations in the Middle East as have nuemrous other intelligence agencies but you are taking those incidents and generalizing them to anything and everything that happens there, consistent with your blind hatred of the Jews and Israel. History has taught us not to trust those who threaten to annihilate us. The Jews and Israel have survived because we didn't put our faith in people such as yourself.

              The desire of the Muslims to commit Jewish genocide has
              existed since the days of Allah and did not start with the onset of the
              Arab-Israeli conflict. With regards to imposing Sharia law, they make no distinction between lands originally Muslim and lands that they conquered by force. They are also not in favor of “peaceful solutions,” and prefer to kill or be killed. They believe that the Jews
              started the French Revolution and the first and second world wars and their
              views on Jews and financial institutions are comparable to the Nazis. They
              claim freedom of all religions under Islam though go on to say that “
              Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Moslem people” and that “Peace and quiet would not be possible
              except under the wing of Islam.”

              The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement

              18 August 1988

              Article Six:

              The Islamic Resistance Movement is a distinguished Palestinian movement,
              whose allegiance is to Allah, and whose way of life is Islam. It strives to
              raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine, for under the wing of
              Islam followers of all religions can coexist in security and safety where their
              lives, possessions and rights are concerned. In the absence of Islam, strife
              will be rife, oppression spreads, evil prevails and schisms and wars will break
              out.

              The Prophet, Allah bless him and grant
              him salvation, has said:

              "The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems
              fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and
              trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew
              behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind
              of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews."
              (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem).

              Article Eleven:

              The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an
              Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem generations until Judgement Day. It,
              or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not
              be given up. Neither a single Arab country nor all Arab countries, neither any
              king or president, nor all the kings and presidents, neither any organization
              nor all of them, be they Palestinian or Arab, possess the right to do that.
              Palestine is an Islamic Waqf land consecrated for Moslem generations until
              Judgement Day. This being so, who could claim to have the right to represent
              Moslem generations till Judgement Day?

              This is the law governing the land of
              Palestine in the Islamic Sharia (law) and the same goes for any land the
              Moslems have conquered by force, because during the times of (Islamic)
              conquests, the Moslems consecrated these lands to Moslem generations till the
              Day of Judgement.

              Article Thirteen:

              Initiatives, and so-called peaceful
              solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles
              of the Islamic Resistance Movement.
              Abusing any part of Palestine is abuse
              directed against part of religion. Nationalism of the Islamic Resistance
              Movement is part of its religion. Its members have been fed on that. For the
              sake of hoisting the banner of Allah over their homeland they fight. "Allah
              will be prominent, but most people do not know."

              Article Fifteen:

              "I swear by the holder of
              Mohammed's soul that I would like to invade and be killed for the sake of
              Allah, then invade and be killed, and then invade again and be killed."
              (As related by al-Bukhari and Moslem).

              Article Twenty-Two:

              For a long time, the enemies have been planning, skillfully and with
              precision, for the achievement of what they have attained. They took into
              consideration the causes affecting the current of events. They strived to amass
              great and substantive material wealth which they devoted to the realisation of
              their dream. With their money, they took control of the world media, news
              agencies, the press, publishing houses, broadcasting stations, and others. With
              their money they stirred revolutions in various parts of the world with the
              purpose of achieving their interests and reaping the fruit therein. They were behind the French Revolution, the Communist revolution and most of the revolutions we heard and hear about, here and there. With their money they formed secret societies, such as
              Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, the Lions and others in different parts of the world
              for the purpose of sabotaging societies and achieving Zionist interests. With
              their money they were able to control imperialistic countries and instigate
              them to colonize many countries in order to enable them to exploit their
              resources and spread corruption there.

              You may speak as much as you want
              about regional and world wars. They were behind World War I, when they were
              able to destroy the Islamic Caliphate, making financial gains and controlling
              resources. They obtained the Balfour Declaration, formed the League of Nations
              through which they could rule the world. They were behind World War II, through
              which they made huge financial gains by trading in armaments, and paved the way
              for the establishment of their state. It was they who instigated the
              replacement of the League of Nations with the United Nations and the Security
              Council to enable them to rule the world through them. There is no war going on
              anywhere, without having their finger in it.

              Article Twenty-Eight:

              Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Moslem people. "May
              the cowards never sleep."

              Article Thirty-One:

              The Islamic Resistance Movement is a
              humanistic movement. It takes care of human rights and is guided by Islamic
              tolerance when dealing with the followers of other religions. It does not
              antagonize anyone of them except if it is antagonized by it or stands in its
              way to hamper its moves and waste its efforts. Under the wing of Islam, it is possible
              for the followers of the three religions - Islam, Christianity and Judaism - to
              coexist in peace and quiet with each other. Peace and quiet would not be
              possible except under the wing of Islam. Past and present history are the best
              witness to that.”

              Look up: “Avalon Project: Hamas
              Covenant 1988,” Yale University School of Law for more information.

              So excuse me Sandman if we don't just sit in our easy chairs and wait for the "end of days." This time we are fighting. Unfortunately for you, there will be no repeat of the Holocaust.

              • 2 votes
              #1.24 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:21 PM EDT

              Allow me to give you a bit of background information about myself. I am 52 years old and have dual
              Israeli-American citizenship (born in US, immigrated to Israel at age 8). It was during my service in the IDF that I became friendly with two Arabs – one a Druze who lives in a town near Haifa and the other who lives in a village near Jerusalem. We remain good friends to this day. We know each other's families well and visit each other whenever I'm in Israel (I currently live in US). Obviously we have ideological differences but agree more than disagree. They are against violence as a means of furthering the Palestinian agenda and I am against building settlements on Arab land. I also believe that the extreme religious right in Israel is a threat to democracy and should be divorced from the political system. I do, however, consider myself a Zionist in that I believe that there should be two distinct states – one Israel where the majority remains Jewish and the other Palestinian where the majority remains Muslim. This should not pose a problem for the Arabs considering the mass of
              land in all Arab countries combined relative to the size of Israel. But this is not a land-for-peace issue – it's a cultural and religious war and always has been. Being a Zionist does not suggest that I am against a two-state solution or believe that we cannot live at peace with each other. One major difference between the Arabs and Jews is that the former espouse a covenant of genocide
              against the Jews and will not permit Jews to live and flourish in a newly established Palestinian state whereas Arabs who are inherently non-violent do very well economically and also politically in Israel today (e.g., they are represented in the Knesset). Both my Arab friends do very well – one owns a
              restaurant and the other an auto repair shop. The difference between you and I is that I have condemned the actions of individual Israelis (e.g., when the Arab youth was assaulted by a group of Israelis a number of months ago) and some of the policies of the Israeli government whereas your posts are consistently one-sided, biased against the Jews. You claim to be anti-Zionist but not
              anti-Jewish but in actuality if you are anti-Zionist you are also anti-Jewish because Zionism advocated, "From inception, tangible as well as spiritual aims. Jews of all persuasions - left and right, religious and secular - joined to form the Zionist movement and worked together toward these goals. Disagreements led to rifts, but ultimately, the common goal of a Jewish state in its ancient
              homeland was attained." You have never attempted to provide a balanced view of the situation there. Have you ever been to Israel? Have you ever met people from both sides of the conflict and attempted to develop a more balance, moral, and truthful account of the conflict?

              • 2 votes
              #1.25 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:25 PM EDT

              David

              Not all Democrats are voting for Obama. I am registered Democrat but I am voting for Romney. Obama has such a bad track record on National Security he should not even be able to run for dog catcher. If you take a look at opsecteam.org they explain all about Obama and his leaks on the Osama raid. I think Romney will be a better President because he is culturally American. Obama may have been born in America but his upbringing is more overseas so Obama THINKS like a person from Kenya or some other third world country over there. Purchase the DVD 2016, Obama's America. That explains how Obama really sees us. As long as Obama is in the White House than ALL our troops should come home right away Regardless of what Obama says or thinks. I have been saying that our troops should go home no matter what ever since Obama kicked out McChrystal. Obama is purposely destroying our military so the Joint Chiefs should ignore him and prioritize getting the home safely. Tactical retreat is the best course as long as the biggest traitor is in the White House.

              David, please take a look at that old Benghazi thread that you posted about McChrystal because I posted something after which is very important. It is concerning the CIA. I also think you cool for your thing about McChrystal.

                #1.26 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:27 PM EDT

                Back in response to Basel:

                The first post was what I expected. The justification for your views, claiming that I'm a selective reader (although your is pretty selective), saying unfortunately the Holocaust is not going to happen again for me; I've seen all these things before and none of it is surprising, to draw a loony caricature of your opponent for everyone else reading.

                Hamas released their charter in 1988. Let's not forget that Israel aided Hamas to fight Fatah under Arafat, and then aided Fatah when Hamas won their elections. So I have a question, based on the charter posted, why did Israel help Hamas grow to fight Fatah? Question 2, is why couldn't Israel get an agreement with the peaceful Mahmoud Abbas, who himself even gave up on trying to find a solution? We must address something first that is the cause of parties like Hamas and Fatah coming into existence (I believe in cause and effect).

                Long before 1988 though, one of the founders of Israel, David Ben Gurion, who has major streets in major cities in the United States named after him said:

                "We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population."

                "We must expel the Arabs and take their places."

                "If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?"

                Based on that account, I have a hard time believing Israel will end its expansionist policy with the defeat of the Palestinians, and I expect them to expand into Lebanon (like they have attempted to before) and into the Golan Heights. With a growing population, more natural resources are needed. Does that sound like a policy devised for peaceful purposes?

                Onto your second post:

                Not all Jews are Zionist; see Norman Finkelstein. I do have Jewish friends who would side with me on the issue, but from the Zionist world view, they are not real "Jews" or are described as "Self-Hating Jews", like Finkelstein. You say it was a cultural and religious war, but where was that war before Zionism set out to establish a homeland in Palestine (your doctrine even calls it Palestine).

                I am glad you are against the building of settlements and your friend against violence. Guess what though? More settlements are being built by the day and the West Bank is about gone, so it is hard to see a 2-state solution now that that has taken place.

                Now onto sources and books, I would recommend the Great War for Civilization by Robert Fisk (2006) for everyone on this board if you want to see what is shaping up for the war on Iran.

                  #1.27 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:11 PM EDT

                  I want to add I am not even sure how this topic got to be about Israel/Palestine conflict. The original posting I made was saying that it is a joke that the US is trying to come in as a fair and balanced investigator when they are clearly not and are coming in with an agenda. If it was a country like say, Brazil that was performing the investigation, then I wouldn't be so suspicious.

                    #1.28 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:31 PM EDT

                    Basil let me tell you about myself. I am a Jew who belongs to Jews against Zionism with Leading Rabbi's in this organization. Don't you dare call them self hating Jews. I am also a Jew who has a Palestinian son-in-law. I have been spit on by an 85 year old Jewish women for this. I've had IDF soldiers tell me the only good Palestinian is a dead one. My son-in law worships the ground my daughter walks on. His parents were forced out of the hotel they owned in Jerusalem at gunpoint. They were never compensated for this property and Jews own it today. And you ask why they hate Jews? They don't hate the Jews to this very day. They hate the eastern European zionist who started all this in 1967.

                      #1.29 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:26 PM EDT

                      ANOTHER issue to add to Mrs. Clinton's resume when she ATTEMPTS to run in 2016.

                      This administration has now thrown America under the bus.

                        #1.30 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:49 PM EDT

                        Parker and Sandman: Parker, I don't know where you got the term "self-hating Jew" from other than referenced by Sandman as it applied to his perception of Zionists views of other Jews. I did not post it here. I used that term re: Noam Chomsky a few months ago but generally do not espouse that view. As to your comment, "I've had IDF soldiers tell me the only good Palestinian is a dead one." Not a particularly pleasant thing to hear and I'm sorry you were exposed to that but it's better than being killed by a Plaestinian homicide bomber while you're dancing in a night club or eating pizza in a restaurant. Perhaps that soldier had a relative (wife, child) killed in that nightclub or restaurant. Once you and Sandman and others like you are also able to condemn the killing of innocent Israeli women abnd children, then there will be peace. As I have intimated, both sides need to address acts of violence but you and Sandman once again are unable to present a balanced view. I believe that some history is called for here because you both seem to think that it all started in 1948 and that the Jews (or Zionists) were solely responsible for it. The following is is from Wikipedia and you can go there and view the list of references if you like.

                        The 1920 Nabi Musa riots or 1920 Jerusalem riots took place in
                        British Mandate of Palestine
                        on April 4–7, 1920 in and around the Old City of Jerusalem.

                        The events coincided with and are named after the Muslim Nabi
                        Musa festival and followed rising tensions in Arab-Jewish relations.
                        The events came shortly after the Battle
                        of Tel Hai and the increasing pressure on Arab nationalists in Syria
                        on the course of the Franco-Syrian War. Among the
                        slogans used to incite the riots were the implications of Zionist
                        immigration and the previous tensions which coincided with attacks on outlying
                        Jewish settlements in the Galilee. Speeches by Arab religious leaders during
                        the festival, in which traditionally large numbers of Muslims gathered for a
                        religious procession, led to a serious outbreak of violent assaults on the
                        city's Jews. Five Jews and four Arabs were killed and several hundreds were
                        wounded.[1]
                        In its wake, sheikhs of 82 villages round the city and Jaffa, claiming to
                        represent 70% of the population, issued a document protesting the violence
                        against the Jews.[2]

                        The British military administration's erratic response failed to contain the
                        rioting, which continued for four days. As a result of the events, trust
                        between the British, Jews, and Arabs eroded. One consequence was that the Jewish community
                        increased moves towards an autonomous infrastructure and security apparatus
                        parallel to that of the British administration.

                        The Battle of Tel Hai was an incident during the Franco-Syrian War,
                        often considered to be the first armed engagement of the Arab–Israeli conflict. The incident took place, when Shiite Arab militia, escorted by Bedouin tribesmen from a nearby village, attempted to ? on the
                        Jewish agricultural settlement of Tel Hai in March 1920In the firefight eight
                        Jews and five Arabs were killed. Joseph Trumpeldor,
                        the commander of Jewish defenders of Tel Hai, was shot in the hand and stomach,
                        and died while being evacuated to Kfar Giladi that evening. The village was
                        eventually abandoned by the Jews and burned by the Arab militia.

                        Events

                        Early tensions

                        At the beginning of the Franco-Syrian War, the area of Upper Galilee was
                        populated by several semi-nomadic Bedouin Arab tribes, the largest residing in
                        Halasa, and four tiny Jewish settlements, including Metula, Kfar Giladi, Tel
                        Hai and Hamra. While the Arab villages and tribesmen allied with the Arab
                        Kingdom of Syria, the Jewish residents decided to remain neutral during the
                        conflict of the Arabs with the French.

                        Early on the course of the war, one of Kfar Giladi residents was killed by
                        an accidental shot from a Bedouin armed party, coming back from a feast at a
                        Christian village. The incident greatly increased the tensions between Jews and
                        Arabs and led to regular pillaging of Jewish villages by the pro-Syrian Bedouin
                        tribesmen, officially in order to "search for French spies and
                        soldiers". In one of the incidents Trumpeldor and several other Jewish
                        militiamen were stripped off their clothes as a public insult by an Arab Bedouin
                        militia.

                        Battle

                        On March 1, 1920, several hundred Shiite Arabs from the village of Jabal
                        Amil in southern Lebanon arrived to the gates of Tel Hai, escorted by Arab
                        Bedouin tribesmen of the nearby Halasa and their Mukhtar - an 18 year old Kamal
                        Affendi. They first demanded to search Tel Hai, while the Jews asked for
                        reinforcements from the kibbutz Kfar Giladi. One of the farmers fired a shot
                        into the air, a signal for reinforcements from nearby Kfar
                        Giladi, which brought ten men led by Trumpeldor, who had been posted
                        by Hashomer
                        to organize defense.[2]
                        Joseph Trumpeldor and his ten men attempted to drive the Shiites and roving
                        village militias away in negotiations.

                        In mainstream Zionist historiography, the Arabs' demand to search Tel Hai on
                        suspicion that there were French soldiers inside was generally regarded as a
                        cynical ruse, with the prior intention of gaining possession and killing the
                        Jewish farmers or driving them away from the area. The direct incident which
                        started the confrontation is commonly mentioned as the Arabs grabbing a gun out
                        of the hands of a woman member of the Tel-Hai community.[citation needed]
                        It is unclear exactly what happened once Trumpeldor assumed command, but an
                        early report speaks of 'misunderstanding on both sides'.

                        Kamal Affendi was then allowed to enter the village under an official demand
                        to search for "French soldiers". He encountered face to face with one
                        of the female Jewish residents named Deborah within one of the houses of Tel
                        Hai. The woman, armed with a pistol pointed it at Kamal, apparently surprised
                        at the view of an armed Bedouin within the village, and as a result a struggle
                        on her pistol took place. A shot was accidentally made during the struggle
                        (unclear whether from the pistol itself or by another weapon) and a major
                        firefight erupted. Trumpeldor was immediately shot and seriously wounded, while
                        the sides barrickaded themselves within the village. Shortly, Kamal Affendi
                        asked to leave, saying it was all a misunderstanding, and the Jewish force
                        approved the cease-fire. During the Arab retreat, one of the Jewish defenders,
                        unaware of the agreements by his comrades and hearing-impared by the previous
                        firefight, shot at the Arab party, and the renewed fighting had raged until
                        afternoon.

                        Ultimately, during the day seven Jews and five Arabs were killed outright;
                        Trumpeldor was shot in the hand and stomach, and died while being evacuated to
                        Kfar Giladi that evening. The survivors of Tel Hai found their position
                        intenable and had no choice but to withdraw - whereupon the place was burned.

                        Aftermath

                        The eight Jews, killed at Tel Hai, were buried in two common graves in Kfar
                        Giladi, and both locations were abandoned for a time.[2]

                        The Franco-Syrian War entered its last stages in July 1920, with the defeat
                        of Hashemites in the Battle of Maysalun. The border
                        in the area of Upper Galilee was finally agreed between the British and the
                        French, and this area was to be included in Mandatory Palestine. It was
                        thus possible for Tel Hai to be resettled in 1921, though it did not become a
                        viable independent community and in 1926 it was absorbed into the kibbutz
                        of Kfar
                        Giladi.

                        A national monument in Upper
                        Galilee, Israel
                        commemorates the deaths of eight Jews, six men and two women, among Joseph
                        Trumpeldor. The memorial is best known for an emblematic statue of a
                        defiant lion representing Trumpeldor and his comrades. The city of Kiryat
                        Shemona, literally Town of the Eight was named after them.

                        Importance

                        Arab–Israeli conflict

                        The incident is often considered the first violent incident of the
                        Arab–Israeli conflict.Idith Zertal has written that it marked 'the dramatic
                        initiation of the violent conflict over Palestine.'[3]

                        On one hand, the incident was a typical brutal and violent attack by rebel
                        Arab militias, which also occurred in many locations across the Middle East
                        during the Ottoman and post-Ottoman times (Ikhwan raids on Transjordan two
                        years later claimed greatly more lives).[citation needed]
                        Numerous attacks on Jews in the region preceded the event,[citation needed]
                        and in many cases those were acts of robbery and violence against a weaker
                        minority, not necessarily the Jews.

                        History

                        The contents and proposals of both the Balfour Declaration of 1917
                        and Paris Peace Conference, 1919,
                        which later concluded with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, were the
                        subject of intensive discussion by both Zionist and Arab delegations, and the
                        process of the negotiations were widely reported in both communities. In
                        particular, the collapse of the Ottoman
                        Empire, led to an undertaking by the victorious powers,
                        predominantly Great Britain and France, to assume a 'holy mission of
                        civilization' in the power vacuum of the Middle East. Under the Balfour
                        Declaration, a homeland for the Jewish people was to be created in Palestine.
                        The principle of self-determination affirmed by
                        the League of Nations was not to
                        be applied to Palestine, given the foreseeable rejection by the people of
                        Zionism, which the British sponsored. These post-WW1 arrangements both for
                        Palestine and other Arab societies led to a 'radicalization' of the Arab world.[3]

                        On March 1, the death at Tel Hai of Joseph
                        Trumpeldor at the hands of a Shiite group from
                        Southern Lebanon, caused deep concerns among Zionist
                        leaders, who made numerous requests to the Mandate administration to
                        address the Yishuv's
                        security and forbid a pro-Syrian public rally. Their fears were largely
                        discounted, however, by the Chief Administrative Officer General Louis
                        Bols, Governor Sir
                        Ronald Storrs and General Edmund
                        Allenby, despite a warning from the President of the World Zionist Organization Dr.
                        Chaim
                        Weizmann that "pogrom is in the air", supported by assessments
                        available to Storrs.[1]

                        Communiqués had been issued about foreseeable troubles between Arabs, Arabs
                        and Jews. To Weizmann these were reminiscent of instructions that Russian generals
                        had issued on the eve of pogroms.[4]
                        In the meantime, local expectations had been raised to a pitch by the
                        declaration of the Syrian Congress on March 7 of the independence of Syria and
                        Palestine, with Faisal as its king.[5]

                        Storrs issued a warning to Arab leaders, but his forces included only 188
                        policemen. The Ottoman Turks usually deployed
                        thousands of soldiers and even artillery to keep order in the narrow streets of
                        Jerusalem during the Nabi Musa procession. Zionist leaders request that the
                        British authorities allow arming of the Jewish defenders to make up for the
                        lack of adequate troops. Although this request was declined, Ze'ev
                        Jabotinsky, together with Pinhas
                        Rutenberg, led an effort to openly train Jewish volunteers in
                        self-defense, an effort which the Zionist Commission kept the
                        British informed of. Many of them members of the Maccabi sports club and some
                        of them veterans of the Jewish Legion, their month of
                        training largely consisted of calisthenics
                        and hand to hand combat with
                        sticks.[1]
                        By the end of March, about 600 were said to be performing military drill daily
                        in Jerusalem.[6]
                        Jabotinsky and Rutenberg also began organizing the collection of arms.[6]

                        April 4–7, 1920 in the Old City

                        The annual Nebi
                        Musa spring festival was a Muslim festival that began on the Friday
                        before Good
                        Friday and involved a procession to the Nebi Musa shrine (tomb of
                        Moses) near Jericho.[7]
                        It had apparently existed since the time of Saladin.[8]
                        Arab educator and essayist Khalil al-Sakakini described
                        how tribes and caravans would come with banners and weapons.[1]

                        By 10:30 a.m. on April 4, 1920, 60,000–70,000 Arabs had already congregated
                        in the city square, and groups of them had already been attacking Jews in the
                        Old City's alleys for over an hour; the Jews hid. Inflammatory anti-Zionist
                        rhetoric was being delivered from the balcony of the Arab Club. One inciter was
                        Hajj Amin al-Husayni; his uncle,
                        the mayor, spoke from the municipal building's balcony.

                        The editor of the newspaper Suriya al-Janubia
                        (Southern Syria), Aref al-Aref, delivered his
                        speech on horseback. The crowd shouted "Independence! Independence!"
                        and "Palestine is our land, the Jews are our dogs!"[1]
                        Arab police joined in applause, and violence started.[9]
                        The Arab local population ransacked the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem.
                        The Torath Chaim Yeshiva was
                        raided, and Torah scrolls were torn and
                        thrown on the floor, and the building then set alight.[1]
                        During the next three hours, 160 Jews were wounded.[9]

                        Khalil al-Sakakini witnessed the eruption of violence in the Old City:

                        "[A] riot broke out, the people began to run about and stones were thrown at the Jews. The
                        shops were closed and there were screams... I saw a Zionist soldier covered in
                        dust and blood... Afterwards, I saw one Hebronite approach a Jewish shoeshine
                        boy, who hid behind a sack in one of the wall's comers next to Jaffa Gate, and
                        take his box and beat him over the head. He screamed and began to run, his head
                        bleeding and the Hebronite left him and returned to the procession... The riot
                        reached its zenith. All shouted, "Muhammad's
                        religion was born with the sword"... I immediately walked to the municipal
                        garden... my soul is nauseated and depressed by the madness of humankind."[10]

                        After the violence broke out, Ze'ev
                        Jabotinsky met Governor Storrs and suggested deployment of his
                        volunteers, but his request was rejected. Storrs confiscated his pistol and
                        demanded to know the location of his other weapons, threatening to arrest him
                        for possessing a firearm. Later, Storrs changed his mind and asked for 200
                        volunteers to report to the police headquarters to be sworn in as deputies.
                        After they arrived and the administering of the oath had begun, orders came to
                        cease and he sent them away. Arab volunteers had also been invited, and were
                        likewise sent away. The army imposed night curfew on Sunday
                        night and arrested several dozen rioters, but on Monday morning they were
                        allowed to attend morning prayers and were then released. Arabs continued to
                        attack Jews and break into their homes, especially in Arab-majority mixed
                        buildings.[1]

                        On Monday, as disturbances grew worse, the Old City was sealed off by the
                        army and no one was allowed to exit the area. Martial
                        law was declared, but looting, burglary,
                        rape, and murder continued.
                        Several homes were set on fire, and tombstones were shattered. British soldiers
                        found that the majority of illicit weapons were concealed on the bodies of Arab
                        women.[1]
                        On Monday evening, the soldiers were evacuated from the Old City, a step that
                        was later declared "an error of judgment" by a court inquiry. The Old
                        City's Jews had no training or weapons, and Jabotinsky's men had been
                        concentrated outside the walled-city.[1]
                        Two volunteers entered the Jewish Quarter disguised as medical personnel to
                        organize self-defense; they prepared rocks and boiling water. One of the volunteers
                        was Nehemia Rabin (Rubitzov), father of Yitzhak
                        Rabin.[1]

                        Several British soldiers were sent to search Jews for arms at the demand of
                        the Palestinian Arab leadership; the British searched the offices and
                        apartments of Weizmann and Jabotinsky. At Jabotinsky's house, they found three rifles, two
                        pistols, and 250 rounds of ammunition. Nineteen men were arrested, but not
                        Jabotinsky, who went to the jail of his own volition to insist on his arrest. A
                        military judge released him because he had not been home when the guns were discovered,
                        but he was again arrested a few hours later. Storrs personally ensured that
                        Jabotinsky received clothing from home, a mattress, and food from an adjacent
                        hotel. It took the British authorities four days to put down the riots.[1]

                        As the riots began, Jewish immigration to Palestine was temporarily halted by the British. Also,
                        feeling that the British were unwilling to defend them from continuous Arab
                        violence, Palestinian Jews decided to set up an underground self-defense
                        militia, the Haganah ("defense"). Furthermore, the riots prompted the
                        Arab leadership in Palestine to view themselves less as southern Syrian Arabs
                        and more as a unique Palestinian Arab community.[1]

                          #1.31 - Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:29 AM EDT

                          BTW Sandman: Gotta love the way you just skirted the genocidal Muslim covenant by merely stating that it was published in 1988 and immediately segueing into a comment that Ben-Gurion allegedly made. Even if he did say this, a policy of expansionism is certainly not Israel's desire today nor is it in her best interest and most Israeli's would not agree to it. It will never happen. Though interesting Sandman, that much of your argument is based on your beliefs regarding hypothetical future occurrences. After all, we did return the Sinai and Gaza and look where it got us. Most illegal outposts will eventually be dismantled when a new government is elected but a few settlements will be kept as part of a buffer zone. We are certainly not suicidal - consider the width of Israel at its midsection acroos from the West Bank and you'll understand that it would be impossible to adequately defend. The Arabs must first prove that they can live peacefully and responsibly in their own state.

                            #1.32 - Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:42 AM EDT

                            Parker and Sandman: this will be my last post here. You can have the last word if you wish. History and rational and moral individuals will one day judge the merits of our positions.

                            Resolution 194, adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 11,
                            1948, addressed a host of issues, but only one paragraph out of 15 dealt with
                            refugees created by the conflict. Resolution 194 attempted to create the tools
                            required to reach a truce in the region. It established a conciliation
                            commission with representatives from the United States, France and Turkey to
                            replace the UN mediator. The commission was charged with achieving "a
                            final settlement of all questions between ∑ governments and authorities
                            concerned." The Resolution‚s "refugee clause" is not a standalone
                            item, as the Arabs would have us think, nor does it pertain specifically to
                            Palestinian Arab refugees.

                            Of the 15 paragraphs, the first six sections addressed ways to achieve
                            a truce; the next four paragraphs addressed the ways that Jerusalem and surrounding
                            villages and towns should be demilitarized, and how an international zone or
                            jurisdiction would be created in and around Jerusalem. The resolution also
                            called on all parties to protect and allow free access to holy places,
                            including religious buildings.

                            One paragraph has drawn the most attention: Paragraph 11, which alone
                            addressed the issue of refugees and compensation for those whose property was
                            lost or damaged. Contrary to Arab claims, it did not guarantee a Right of
                            Return and certainly did not guarantee an unconditional Right of Return
                            ˆ that is the right of Palestinian Arab refugees to return to Israel. Nor did
                            it specifically mention Arab refugees, thereby indicating that the
                            resolution was aimed at all refugees, both Jewish and Arab. Instead, Resolution
                            194 recommended that refugees be allowed to return to their homeland if they
                            met two important conditions:

                            1. That they be willing to live in peace with
                            their neighbors.

                            2. That the return takes place "at the
                            earliest practicable date."

                            The resolution also recommended that for those who did not wish to
                            return, "Compensation should be paid for the property ∑ and for loss of or
                            damage to property" by the "governments or authorities
                            responsible."

                            Although Arab leaders point to Resolution 194 as proof that Arab
                            refugees have a right of return or be compensated, it is important to note that
                            the Arab States: Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen voted
                            against Resolution 194. Israel is not even mentioned in the resolution. The
                            fact that plural wording also is used ˆ "governments or
                            authorities" ˆ suggests that, contrary to Arab claims, the burden of
                            compensation does not fall solely upon one side of the conflict. Because seven
                            Arab armies invaded Israel, Israel was not responsible for creating the refugee
                            problem. When hundreds of thousands of Arab Jews, under threat of death, attack
                            and other forms of persecution, were forced to flee Arab communities, the State
                            of Israel absorbed the overwhelming majority of them into the then-fledgling
                            nation.

                            The Forgotten Jewish Refugees

                            For a host of reasons ˆ practical to parochial ˆ Israel has failed to
                            raise the issue of the mammoth injustice done to almost a million Jews from
                            Arab countries. The scale and premeditated state-sponsored nature of persecution
                            that prompted the 1948 flight of close to 900,000 Jews from their homes has
                            only recently begun to emerge. Arab publicists have sought to detach entirely
                            the flight of Jews from Arab lands from the Arab-Israeli conflict, claiming
                            they are two separate phenomena, and that Israelis should take up the issue
                            with each respective Arab state that was involved, not with the Palestinian
                            Arabs.

                            Clearly this is an attempt to rewrite history.
                            One only needs to reexamine the almost prophetic article in The New
                            York Times
                            two days after Israel declared independence ("Jews in Grave
                            Danger in all Moslem Lands") to confirm the tie. The New York
                            Times
                            reported on May 16, 1948:

                            "For nearly four months, the United Nations has had before it, an
                            appeal for Œimmediate and urgent‚ consideration of the case of the Jewish
                            populations in Arab and Moslem countries stretching from Morocco to
                            India."

                            The New York Times country-by-country table
                            estimated the Jewish population-at-risk as 899,000 people. The article cited
                            the dismissal of Jews in the civil service in Syria, per capita ransom payment
                            of $20,000 by Iraqi Jews seeking to leave Iraq, a forced levy on the Lebanese
                            Jewish community to support the Arab war effort parallel to incitement and
                            physical attacks on Jews, and Jews fleeing to India from Afghanistan. It quoted
                            the UN Economic and Social Council report as saying:

                            "The very survival of the Jewish communities
                            in certain Arab and Moslem countries is in serious danger, unless preventive
                            action is taken without delay."

                            Hostility and oppression only grew, ultimately leading to the exodus
                            of almost all Jews from all Arab and Moslem countries from Casablanca to
                            Karachi.

                            How and Why Did Palestinian Arabs Leave, and Who
                            Was Responsible?

                            It is important to set the historical record straight: The
                            overwhelming majority of Palestinian Arab refugees left what was then the
                            newly-established State of Israel on their own accord due to structural
                            weaknesses within Palestinian Arab society and their leadership.

                            The pressure of wartime conditions triggered the collapse of what was
                            already a fragile Palestinian Arab society, particularly when Palestinian Arab
                            leaders chose to oppose the Jewish state by a show of arms rather than by
                            accepting a UN plan for their own state. Those events set the stage for the
                            forceful expulsion of countless other Palestinian Arabs from Jewish-held areas.
                            That military necessity resulted after seven Arab armies invaded western
                            Palestine with the goal of exterminating the newly born State of Israel.

                            On their own accord, an estimated 600,000 Palestinian Arabs fled a war
                            zone, which their leaders had created. An estimated 250,000 to 300,000 of those
                            refugees in 1948 left even before their homes became part of a war zone.

                            The human tragedy of being uprooted notwithstanding, Arab refugees
                            were neither hapless targets nor innocent bystanders. The first stage of the
                            1948 war was a fierce interethnic or anti-Zionist civil war in which
                            Palestinian Arabs were the aggressors and the initiators; the second half was
                            an all-out war involving regular Arab armies, whose participation the
                            Palestinian Arabs engineered.

                            The violent path that Palestinian Arabs chose ˆ and the ensuing fear,
                            disorientation, and economic deprivation of war ˆ led to their own collective
                            undoing.

                            The Collapse of Palestinian Society and Mass
                            Flight

                            What caused the collapse of Palestinian Arab society? In part, it was
                            the absence of an alternative Arab infrastructure after the British pulled out
                            from Palestine. In addition, serious cleavages dating to Ottoman times existed
                            in local Arab society. Because Palestinian Arab society had been so dependent
                            on British civil administration and social services, Britain‚s departure left
                            Arab civil servants jobless. As a result, most social services and civil
                            administration ceased to function in the Arab sector, disrupting the flow of
                            essential commodities such as food and fuel, which added to the hardships, the
                            uncertainty, and the dangers.

                            In contrast, Jewish society in Palestine, or the Yishuv as it
                            was called in Hebrew, had established its own civil society over the span of
                            three decades under the Mandate. The Yishuv created its own
                            representative political bodies and social and economic institutions, including
                            health and welfare services, a public transport network, and a thriving
                            sophisticated marketing system for manufactured goods and food ˆ in short, a
                            state-in-the-making. It was best described by the 1934 British report to the
                            League of Nations:

                            "During the last two or three generations the Jews have recreated
                            in Palestine a community, now numbering 80,000, of whom about one-fourth are
                            farmers or workers upon the land. This community has its own political organs,
                            an elected assembly for the direction of its domestic concerns, elected
                            councils in the towns, and an organisation for the control of its schools. It
                            has its elected Chief Rabbinate and Rabbinical Council for the direction of its
                            religious affairs. Its business is conducted in Hebrew as a vernacular
                            language, and a Hebrew press serves its needs. It has its distinctive
                            intellectual life and displays considerable economic activity. This community,
                            then, with its town and country population, its political, religious and social
                            organisations, its own language, its own customs, its own life, has in fact
                            Œnational‚ characteristics."

                            And as time passed:

                            "Those characteristics have been strengthened and magnified in
                            the course of the following twelve years. To-day there are in Palestine almost
                            300,000 Jews. There is a constantly flowing stream of men and money, new industries
                            are being established, citriculture is expanding, new settlements are springing
                            up, towns are being enlarged by suburb after suburb."

                            During that same period, the Arabs in Palestine, however, had invested
                            all of their energies into fighting any form of Jewish polity-in-the-making.
                            Although the British encouraged creation of an Arab Agency parallel to the
                            Jewish Agency that had orchestrated and financed development of the Jewish
                            sector, a similar Arab organization failed to develop.

                            So it was no surprise that when the British departed, the Palestinian
                            Arabs remained unorganized and ill-prepared not only for statehood (which they
                            rejected in any case), but also for sustained conflict with their Jewish
                            adversaries. In the end, the war caused horrific casualties for the Jews and
                            left thousands of Palestinian Arabs without their homes.

                            UN Resolution 194:

                            A/RES/194 (III) of 11 December 1948

                            "Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and
                            live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the
                            earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the
                            property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property
                            which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good
                            by the Governments or authorities responsible;

                            "Instructs the Conciliation Commission to
                            facilitate the repatriation, resettlement and economic and social
                            rehabilitation of the refugees and the payment of compensation, and to maintain
                            close relations with the Director of the United Nations Relief for Palestine
                            Refugees and, through him, with the appropriate organs and agencies of the
                            United Nations."

                              #1.33 - Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:53 AM EDT

                              Sandman: Would you kindly send me the reference to your statement that Israel aided Hamas?

                                #1.34 - Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:16 AM EDT
                                Reply

                                hey i got a idea,lets send billions of dollars more oversea's while our economy goes down the toilet here in the U.S, did we just boeeow a ton more cash off of china? Obama and Clinton need impeached now! bad for our foreign policy,bad for America.

                                • 6 votes
                                Reply#2 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:22 AM EDT

                                Instead, they will send the FBI, whose reason for creation was domestic intelligence and security.

                                • 4 votes
                                #2.1 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:07 AM EDT

                                gm bill

                                they had to go the CIA had a party to attend........ bet the hookers get paid this time..............

                                • 5 votes
                                #2.2 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:41 AM EDT

                                they thought about sending ICE as they weren't doing anything else, but then they remembered those clowns couldn't even find a bus load of known illegals with a big "no papers no fear" banner on the side that was parked right outside the DNC

                                • 6 votes
                                #2.3 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:46 AM EDT

                                gm Tramp,

                                They could have sent TSA, on the off chance that some of the perpetrators might be babies in strollers or great-grandmothers in diapers.

                                • 2 votes
                                #2.4 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:45 AM EDT

                                Yep. They both need to be removed.

                                • 2 votes
                                #2.5 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:31 AM EDT
                                Reply

                                What a mess!!! Will be interesting how Obama spins his foreign policy during the debate this evening.

                                • 8 votes
                                Reply#3 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:24 AM EDT

                                And I suppose Obama is at fault for this attack as well?

                                Give it a rest...

                                • 3 votes
                                #3.1 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:05 AM EDT

                                Ray in Jax

                                And I suppose Obama is at fault for this attack as well?

                                Give it a rest...

                                If you don't believe Obama is responsible for the security failures in Benghazi, then you can't believe that the Pope is responsible for the actions of pedophile priests.

                                • 6 votes
                                #3.2 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:10 AM EDT

                                Everyone wants our assistance. At the same time, most Muslims hate us!

                                Nonsense the vast majority of Muslims in the world do not hate us thats a neocon bs quote. Most are peace loving people like most of us are. We have the same thing here with the Arian Nation KKK and other hate groups who hide behind religion to impose their warped ideas on others. All Germans and All Japanese did not hate us in the second world war either.To make a statement like the above shows little know;ledge of the real facts.

                                • 3 votes
                                #3.3 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:15 AM EDT

                                If you don't believe Obama is responsible for the security failures in Benghazi, then you can't believe that the Pope is responsible for the actions of pedophile priests.

                                Idiots believe that sane people do not. How is the President going to do hands on in security at a remote outpost when there are at least 300 such missions? The fact is we kicked the jihadists in the az and we are at war with them bengaxi was weak because it was in a country who cannot because of the government being overthrown not ready to act on securing the mission there. In war you win some and you lose a few but in the over all picture we are winning under Obama 10 to 1. Expecting a 100% win factor is never going to happen. No Matter how well short of sending a batallion of troops to surround the embassy, which the government over there would not have allowed, what would you have done? Reagan sat in the white house when they blew up the troops in Beirute. There was not this kind of outcry then but people opposite of you radical righties do not play that way. All you are doing in this latest witch hunt is aiding and abetting the enemy because they are dancing in the street over you actions you unamerican aholes.

                                • 3 votes
                                #3.4 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:23 AM EDT

                                How is the President going to do hands on in security at a remote outpost when there are at least 300 such missions?

                                perhaps by spending money on security instead of weapons to give to our enemy's?...think that might work?......

                                • 3 votes
                                #3.5 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:50 AM EDT

                                Or buying electric cars for embassies.

                                  #3.6 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:49 AM EDT

                                  Giantego: You are correct: The "vast majority" of Muslims do not hate us. However, a large minority of Muslims do, and in a poulation of 1.2-2.0 billion, that's a big number. And you are also correct in stating that "all" Germans did not hate us during WWII, but a majority did and particiated in one way or another, either directly or by collusion, in genocide. Aryan nation and KKK did not by any stretch of the imagination approximate even remotely the number of Muslim murderers today. Your argument is specious.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #3.7 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:16 AM EDT

                                  Giantego - Nonsense the vast majority of Muslims in the world do not hate us thats a neocon bs quote

                                  Liar Liar, Pants on Fire!

                                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSkv_29Rncg

                                  President Obama is not a neocon:

                                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY&feature=fvwrel

                                  President Obama's Appeasement of Islam Policies.

                                  The Representative to the Entire Islamic World, Fundamentalist Islamic Amin Al Husseini, signed the Forever Alliance, 1933, with Chancellor Hitler. Co founder of the Fundamentalist Islamic Arab League of Nations, charter the extermination of the Jews; demands and gets repeated attacks to exterminate the Jews (Israel), while most Islamic Nations spend their money buying USSR Weapons instead of building their own Infrastructure or improving the lives of their own people.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #3.8 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:35 AM EDT

                                  So you see, David, history, which you quote, is indeed important.

                                    #3.9 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:12 PM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    Everyone wants our assistance. At the same time, most Muslims hate us!

                                    We see Muslims, especially Sunnis, inventing problems in most of the non-Muslim nations.

                                    Hillarys, McCains, Netanyahos, Libernanns, Romneys keep their hopes alive by dancing as the Sunni Islamic religious Nazis want!

                                    Even in the US, we can notice these actions!

                                    When Muslims form more than five percent, downhill march starts.

                                    Muslims are inventing problems in Myanmar, Thailand, Philippines, India and other places.

                                    When they form more than 30 percent then it is Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, Lebanon (few decades back)

                                    In Muslim majority nations, they kill each other!

                                    Better wake up before it is too late on inventions of problems by followers of Islamic cult!

                                    • 6 votes
                                    Reply#4 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:06 AM EDT

                                    We need to get the Muslin out of the whitehouse.

                                    • 8 votes
                                    #4.1 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:17 AM EDT

                                    Who would that be or are you still in to the birther thing that every sane person has dismissed. Obama is a christian.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #4.2 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:25 AM EDT

                                    Obama is the Manchurian candidate...

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #4.3 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:50 AM EDT

                                    A Kenyan
                                    lawmaker told the nation’s parliament last month that Barack Obama was born in
                                    Africa and is therefore “not even a native American.”

                                    MP James Orengo claims Obama was born
                                    in Kenya


                                    During debate over the draft of a new Kenyan constitution, James Orengo,
                                    the country’s minister of lands and a member of parliament for the Ugenya
                                    constituency, cited America’s election of a Kenyan-born president as an example
                                    of what can be accomplished when diverse peoples unite:

                                    “If America was living
                                    in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a
                                    multiparty state or nation,” Orengo posited, “how could a young man born here in
                                    Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the president of
                                    America?”

                                    Orengo held
                                    up the U.S. as a country no longer “living in the past,” since Americans elected
                                    a Kenyan-born president without regard to “ethnic consideration and
                                    objectives.”

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #4.4 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:53 AM EDT

                                    THIS EXCHANGE SAYS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TROUBLE AND HIS MENTALITY...
                                    HIS REPLY IS AT THE BOTTOM:

                                    @Trouble,

                                    That is fine, hope you find the right graves to dance on at the National Cemetary...

                                    But, why not just dance on all of them, there are thousands! Mostly military, some from
                                    government service

                                    If you don't want perverts to have your email address, why give it to Uly and
                                    ConvenientiLies?

                                    Sorry your golf match got rained out....

                                    Now, one last point, and everyone can see what I am telling you...

                                    I have offered blessings upon your brother, and like it or not on you and your grandkids...
                                    I have offered an olive branch, you refuse to accept any of it....Your loss.

                                    As long as you continue to call-names, (and not just to me), to bastardize names, to spin
                                    lies, or anything of the sort, I will not stoop to the low-class level you live on, such
                                    as #1203.5.

                                    If you wish to discuss something, without the crap, let me know.

                                    **************************************************

                                    trouble46545

                                    LMFAO

                                    #1203.7 - Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:26 PM CDT

                                    THIS REPLY, ABOVE, WAS IN RESPONSE TO HIS STATEMENT OF DANCING ON THE
                                    GRAVES OF MY GRANDSONS WHO DIED IN IRAQ

                                      #4.5 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:59 AM EDT

                                      @ Trouble.

                                      Yeah, that proves it then.

                                      Laughable.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #4.6 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:53 AM EDT

                                      Say What?, AKA Paul M.
                                      Price,

                                      Steven, (I mean Paulie). Sorry but when I think of you I
                                      picture Steven Hawking. (Only you're not as good looking) With your chin on your
                                      scrawney little chest and drool running down the front of your Pajamas. (But
                                      believe me it is evident you don't have his brain).

                                      Before I encountered
                                      you I didn't think it was possible to hate (and pity) someone I had never met. I
                                      don't know why you decided to lavish me with your praise and adoration. (With
                                      your private emails), And your public display of hatred.

                                      I think it started the
                                      day I said that I had to have the starter rebuilt for my 52 DeSoto. You couldn't
                                      stand someone having anything nicer than you did so you made up a story about a
                                      '47 Ford and a Studebaker and I forget what all you said you had. All of the
                                      classic cars you dreamed about only you said they were real. Then you made up
                                      children which in your condition I'm sure are fictitious. Of course in your
                                      story they also all had classic cars.

                                      I actually believed
                                      you at first. It was when you said something about "electile dysfunction" and I
                                      made a joke and said "got viagra" (which you must not have anything for it to
                                      help with because you took it personal) and said I should ask 'my wife's pimp'
                                      for some. That was when I knew that there was something off about you.

                                      Am I special or do you
                                      copy everything everyone on these threads writes? I have come to realize that
                                      you spend every waking moment on here spreading your love around
                                      (joke).

                                      It must be horrible
                                      to hate as much as you do. (But you're a good teacher). I have learned from you.
                                      I can now only assume that all Liberals are as disgusting as you are.

                                      I have no idea why you
                                      made up the story about being in the Navy for thirty years, but when I said my
                                      dead brother had been in for twenty-one years you decided he was fictitious.
                                      (maybe because you made your service up). So you made jokes about him.That was
                                      when you made up the story about two grandsons dying in Iraq. If you had said
                                      ONE I might have believed you but it is against regulation for two siblings to
                                      serve together in combat. (Everyone is not stupid). (If you had actually been in
                                      the Navy you would have known about the Sullivan brothers).

                                      I for one am glad you
                                      are not in this country. (Or is that made up also?)

                                      You are a sad
                                      disgusting little old man and I pray that you get everything in life that you
                                      deserve. (Maybe you already have).

                                        #4.7 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:07 AM EDT
                                        Reply

                                        The opposition leaders had a very interesting take on this. Mikati is close to Assad, Hezbollah, US pledges to help Mikati , and the US doesn't do anything to help bring the bloodshed to an end in Syria. This is very interesting as it makes sense as to why obama bombed Libya yet he wont help Syria.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        Reply#5 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:13 AM EDT

                                        Here comes another misinformed nobody stating facts that do not exist. I would direct you attention to another story here today on this web site and learn why we are not backing the rebels in Syria. After you read that story go find out why the Us aided the rebels in Lybya. As it seems you are so misinformed why not in the future take some time to read up on things instead of parroting crap off of blogs which are out there to mislead for the most part!

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #5.1 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:29 AM EDT

                                        The info I used for the most part is in this article as if you read it you would know. Prehaps I should have expanded it a bit. 1st obama UNCONSTITUTIONALY takes military action in Libya at the UN's request. 2nd we have done nothing to help stop the mass killing of innocent civilians in Syria. 3rd Makati is said to be friends with Assad. 4th the US pledges to help Makati. Now if you can't see the pattern or refuse to that is your own problem. The inept asclown obama will be handed his termination notice next month as his policies are all around failures, and those that obama supports, and that support obama is VERY QUESTIONABLE.

                                        • 3 votes
                                        #5.2 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:48 AM EDT

                                        Giantego

                                        That could be Obozo himself.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        #5.3 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:55 AM EDT

                                        THIS EXCHANGE SAYS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TROUBLE AND HIS MENTALITY...
                                        HIS REPLY IS AT THE BOTTOM:

                                        @Trouble,

                                        That is fine, hope you find the right graves to dance on at the National Cemetary...

                                        But, why not just dance on all of them, there are thousands! Mostly military, some from
                                        government service

                                        If you don't want perverts to have your email address, why give it to Uly and
                                        ConvenientiLies?

                                        Sorry your golf match got rained out....

                                        Now, one last point, and everyone can see what I am telling you...

                                        I have offered blessings upon your brother, and like it or not on you and your grandkids...
                                        I have offered an olive branch, you refuse to accept any of it....Your loss.

                                        As long as you continue to call-names, (and not just to me), to bastardize names, to spin
                                        lies, or anything of the sort, I will not stoop to the low-class level you live on, such
                                        as #1203.5.

                                        If you wish to discuss something, without the crap, let me know.

                                        **************************************************

                                        trouble46545

                                        LMFAO

                                        #1203.7 - Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:26 PM CDT

                                        THIS REPLY, ABOVE, WAS IN RESPONSE TO HIS STATEMENT OF DANCING ON THE
                                        GRAVES OF MY GRANDSONS WHO DIED IN IRAQ

                                          #5.4 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:59 AM EDT

                                          CKSM

                                          Say What, Yea, sure. The secretary going on Sunday talk shows and saying it was due to the anti-muslim video was ALL true! Surely you are smarter than that.

                                          You're joking right? Smarter than that?

                                            #5.5 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:04 AM EDT

                                            Say What?, AKA Paul M.
                                            Price,

                                            Steven, (I mean Paulie). Sorry but when I think of you I
                                            picture Steven Hawking. (Only you're not as good looking) With your chin on your
                                            scrawney little chest and drool running down the front of your Pajamas. (But
                                            believe me it is evident you don't have his brain).

                                            Before I encountered
                                            you I didn't think it was possible to hate (and pity) someone I had never met. I
                                            don't know why you decided to lavish me with your praise and adoration. (With
                                            your private emails), And your public display of hatred.

                                            I think it started the
                                            day I said that I had to have the starter rebuilt for my 52 DeSoto. You couldn't
                                            stand someone having anything nicer than you did so you made up a story about a
                                            '47 Ford and a Studebaker and I forget what all you said you had. All of the
                                            classic cars you dreamed about only you said they were real. Then you made up
                                            children which in your condition I'm sure are fictitious. Of course in your
                                            story they also all had classic cars.

                                            I actually believed
                                            you at first. It was when you said something about "electile dysfunction" and I
                                            made a joke and said "got viagra" (which you must not have anything for it to
                                            help with because you took it personal) and said I should ask 'my wife's pimp'
                                            for some. That was when I knew that there was something off about you.

                                            Am I special or do you
                                            copy everything everyone on these threads writes? I have come to realize that
                                            you spend every waking moment on here spreading your love around
                                            (joke).

                                            It must be horrible
                                            to hate as much as you do. (But you're a good teacher). I have learned from you.
                                            I can now only assume that all Liberals are as disgusting as you are.

                                            I have no idea why you
                                            made up the story about being in the Navy for thirty years, but when I said my
                                            dead brother had been in for twenty-one years you decided he was fictitious.
                                            (maybe because you made your service up). So you made jokes about him.That was
                                            when you made up the story about two grandsons dying in Iraq. If you had said
                                            ONE I might have believed you but it is against regulation for two siblings to
                                            serve together in combat. (Everyone is not stupid). (If you had actually been in
                                            the Navy you would have known about the Sullivan brothers).

                                            I for one am glad you
                                            are not in this country. (Or is that made up also?)

                                            You are a sad
                                            disgusting little old man and I pray that you get everything in life that you
                                            deserve. (Maybe you already have).

                                              #5.6 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:09 AM EDT

                                              THIS EXCHANGE SAYS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TROUBLE AND HIS MENTALITY...
                                              HIS REPLY IS AT THE BOTTOM:

                                              @Trouble,

                                              That is fine, hope you find the right graves to dance on at the National Cemetary...

                                              But, why not just dance on all of them, there are thousands! Mostly military, some from
                                              government service

                                              If you don't want perverts to have your email address, why give it to Uly and
                                              ConvenientiLies?

                                              Sorry your golf match got rained out....

                                              Now, one last point, and everyone can see what I am telling you...

                                              I have offered blessings upon your brother, and like it or not on you and your grandkids...
                                              I have offered an olive branch, you refuse to accept any of it....Your loss.

                                              As long as you continue to call-names, (and not just to me), to bastardize names, to spin
                                              lies, or anything of the sort, I will not stoop to the low-class level you live on, such
                                              as #1203.5.

                                              If you wish to discuss something, without the crap, let me know.

                                              **************************************************

                                              trouble46545

                                              LMFAO

                                              #1203.7 - Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:26 PM CDT

                                              THIS REPLY, ABOVE, WAS IN RESPONSE TO HIS STATEMENT OF DANCING ON THE
                                              GRAVES OF MY GRANDSONS WHO DIED IN IRAQ.

                                              And, to clarify his latest lie, I NEVER ONCE SAID THEY SERVED IN IRAQ AT THE SAME TIME

                                              ***************************************

                                              @Trouble:

                                              "pensions from the Navy. All they did was get paid to be on a cruise""'sea going bellhops"

                                              You criticized Navy pensions....all of us here would love to hear about your military heroics...don't hold back...tell it all...all your combat and exciting battles....

                                              Thanks for insulting hundreds of thousands of military veterans who protected your slimy ass for so many years.

                                                #5.7 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:52 AM EDT

                                                Say What?, AKA Paul M.
                                                Price,

                                                Steven, (I mean Paulie). Sorry but when I think of you I
                                                picture Steven Hawking. (Only you're not as good looking) With your chin on your
                                                scrawney little chest and drool running down the front of your Pajamas. (But
                                                believe me it is evident you don't have his brain).

                                                Before I encountered
                                                you I didn't think it was possible to hate (and pity) someone I had never met. I
                                                don't know why you decided to lavish me with your praise and adoration. (With
                                                your private emails), And your public display of hatred.

                                                I think it started the
                                                day I said that I had to have the starter rebuilt for my 52 DeSoto. You couldn't
                                                stand someone having anything nicer than you did so you made up a story about a
                                                '47 Ford and a Studebaker and I forget what all you said you had. All of the
                                                classic cars you dreamed about only you said they were real. Then you made up
                                                children which in your condition I'm sure are fictitious. Of course in your
                                                story they also all had classic cars.

                                                I actually believed
                                                you at first. It was when you said something about "electile dysfunction" and I
                                                made a joke and said "got viagra" (which you must not have anything for it to
                                                help with because you took it personal) and said I should ask 'my wife's pimp'
                                                for some. That was when I knew that there was something off about you.

                                                Am I special or do you
                                                copy everything everyone on these threads writes? I have come to realize that
                                                you spend every waking moment on here spreading your love around
                                                (joke).

                                                It must be horrible
                                                to hate as much as you do. (But you're a good teacher). I have learned from you.
                                                I can now only assume that all Liberals are as disgusting as you are.

                                                I have no idea why you
                                                made up the story about being in the Navy for thirty years, but when I said my
                                                dead brother had been in for twenty-one years you decided he was fictitious.
                                                (maybe because you made your service up). So you made jokes about him.That was
                                                when you made up the story about two grandsons dying in Iraq. If you had said
                                                ONE I might have believed you but it is against regulation for two siblings to
                                                serve together in combat. (Everyone is not stupid). (If you had actually been in
                                                the Navy you would have known about the Sullivan brothers).

                                                I for one am glad you
                                                are not in this country. (Or is that made up also?)

                                                You are a sad
                                                disgusting little old man and I pray that you get everything in life that you
                                                deserve. (Maybe you already have).

                                                  #5.8 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:08 AM EDT

                                                  President Obama Overthrew a Former US Ally President Gaddaffi and Installed the Fundamentalist Islamic Jihadists of Al Quada Saudi Arabia (AQ), Al Quada Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Al Quada Syria (AQS), Al Quada Yemen (AQY), Hezbollah, Al Quada Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), etc. renamed themselves Ansar Al Shariah, to protect and install Fundamentalist Islamic Shia (Sharia) Laws as the Rule of Law for Libya.

                                                  The Fundamentalist Islamic Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were those Islamic Jihadist Foreign Fighters killing US Military at Iraq.

                                                  The Fundamentalist Islamic Libyan Islamic Fighting Group is the current Government of Libya.

                                                  President Obama as Commander In Chief Orders the US Military to Attack Libya without informing US Congress 48 Hours before ANY US Military Activities. The ONLY ILLEGAL UNFUNDED WAR, was President Obama's Libya, in DIRECT Violation of US Law, that LIMITS and RESTRICTS the US Presidential War Powers, 1973 War Powers Resolution (Act), this is an Impeachable Offense. President Obama did NOT notify Both Houses of US Congress 48 Hours before ANY US Military Actions, because US Congress was not notified they did not have time to write a US Law (therefore ILLEGAL) with US Congressional Appropriations (therefore UNFUNDED) to cover President Obama's arse. So without US Congressional Appropriations, President Obama used not Budgeted For Discretionary Spending.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #5.9 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:24 PM EDT

                                                  David

                                                  You are right. Obama did that Impeachable offense. But take a number because that is not the only impeachable offense that Obama has done. He leaked information leading to the death of a CIA asset who helped us Find Bin Ladden. Obama on too many occasions leaked information leading to the deaths of our CIA and other covert operatives. Obama told too many people how we do our operations which is supposed to be kept secret. And what about that killing of our Ambassador and the three other men. That was an inside job requiring counter intelligence information to be passed to the attackers. The same attackers knew where the CIA safe house was in order to attack that target as well. Someone who was privy to all this information gave it to the terrorists. All this information is supposed to be SECRET! So which of these many crimes do we impeach Obama on or should we use all of the above.

                                                    #5.10 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:47 PM EDT
                                                    Reply

                                                    Stay out of it and the entire Middle-East. Let them blow each other up until they are ALL gone. Unless of course you want to send 'em a nuke to further the process along quicker.

                                                      Reply#6 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:58 AM EDT

                                                      Iran will be the final war that will spark the next world war from all these others that have been looming all across the Middle East.

                                                      The world sucks.

                                                      As will the next big war.

                                                        Reply#7 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:02 AM EDT

                                                        we will piss away our tax dollars because a foreigner got killed. When US citizens get murdered it is not considered a heinous act? Obama needs to retire.

                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        Reply#8 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:46 AM EDT

                                                        get us the hell out of there, and get the bitch and her alien muslim boss out of our whitehouse ! ! ! ! ! your chance is coming soon, make your vote count ! ! ! ! this pompus anti=american is out to ruin the united states, and turn us into a socialist state so his "people" can reign?????? wake up america before it is too late, like what has happened in spain, greece????? how do you want to live??????????

                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        Reply#9 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:00 AM EDT

                                                        We help them investigate and we learn new intel about the radical muslim terrorists in the area. Not a bad deal. We can also keep tabs on the radical muslim terrorist wanna be's over in Detroit. That place is a brood of vipers waiting to strike.

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        Reply#10 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:07 AM EDT

                                                        Carlito-1901240 - We help them investigate and we learn new intel about the radical muslim terrorists in the area.

                                                        Do not even marginalize the extent of the problem with "radical muslim terrorists" when you are talking about the MAJORITY of the 1.5 Billion Islamic Believers Worldwide as Fundamentalist Islamic Believers (Islamic Believers completely subjugated to Islam is the Definition to become "Muslims").

                                                        Carlito-1901240 - Not a bad deal.

                                                        Chickenhawk, it is nice to say "we" when that does not include YOU.

                                                        We cannot afford this anymore. President Obama spent $2.1 Trillion that was not previously Budgeted for, requring the Cuts to the previously Budgeted For Programs, Projects, Agencies.

                                                        ALL of you Demoncraps demanding this or not stopping YOUR insanity; at YOUR Expense Fly to Beirut AND provide YOUR own Security. If you get killed, injured, wounded, US will deny your very existance.

                                                        No matter who you determine did the bombing, everyone will be accusing YOU of taking sides and demand your execution.

                                                        Carlito-1901240 - We can also keep tabs on the radical muslim terrorist wanna be's over in Detroit. That place is a brood of vipers waiting to strike.

                                                        Let the Demoncraps kill each other off. US Labor Unions, "(President Obama) We are your Army", so ok, the US Labor Unions volunteered to the President as Commander In Chief to go into Combat to replace the US Military, US Labor Unions go do that.

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #10.1 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:21 PM EDT
                                                        Reply

                                                        Oh Goody, the Wash D.C military industrial complex can trot off to another 10+ year war in Lebennon. The democratic and republican herd intellects will give the war their ardent support. Obama is a democrat so the dems will silently tow the party line. The republicans never met a war that they did not like. "So between the two of them they licked the platter clean".

                                                          Reply#11 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:15 AM EDT

                                                          Beirut. My dad was there as part of a Marine expeditionary force in the 50's. I was there in the early 80's and just missed the barracks bombing as I was transferred to Okinawa. That's 60 years of time and we are still going there as if we can force our will on these people who have been fighting each other for thousands of years. What a waste of time and money.

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          Reply#14 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:05 AM EDT

                                                          I know it's too much to wish for, but I wish clinton and obama and holder would all go to prison, or just maybe — — — — — — — — * — — !

                                                            Reply#15 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:14 AM EDT

                                                            Why does hilary have to pledge to investigate terrorists bombings? That's what the state department does. Makes it sound like she had to get permission from a radical muslim!

                                                            All this middle east terrorism debacle and cover up is very good grounds for impeachment. Even stronger than watergate. This errogant so called president needs to be tried.

                                                              Reply#16 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:56 AM EDT

                                                              spudson - Why does hilary have to pledge to investigate terrorists bombings?

                                                              Same reason why President Obama Overthrew a Former US Ally President Gaddaffi and Installed the Fundamentalist Islamic Jihadists of Al Quada Saudi Arabia (AQ), Al Quada Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Al Quada Syria (AQS), Al Quada Yemen (AQY), Hezbollah, Al Quada Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), etc. renamed themselves Ansar Al Shariah, to protect and install Fundamentalist Islamic Shia (Sharia) Laws as the Rule of Law for Libya.

                                                              The Fundamentalist Islamic Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were those Islamic Jihadist Foreign Fighters killing US Military at Iraq.

                                                              The Fundamentalist Islamic Libyan Islamic Fighting Group is the current Government of Libya.

                                                              President Obama as Commander In Chief Orders the US Military to Attack Libya without informing US Congress 48 Hours before ANY US Military Activities. The ONLY ILLEGAL UNFUNDED WAR, was President Obama's Libya, in DIRECT Violation of US Law, that LIMITS and RESTRICTS the US Presidential War Powers, 1973 War Powers Resolution (Act), this is an Impeachable Offense. President Obama did NOT notify Both Houses of US Congress 48 Hours before ANY US Military Actions, because US Congress was not notified they did not have time to write a US Law (therefore ILLEGAL) with US Congressional Appropriations (therefore UNFUNDED) to cover President Obama's arse. So without US Congressional Appropriations, President Obama used not Budgeted For Discretionary Spending.

                                                              Same Reason why President Obama pledged to rebuild Libya (with US Taxpayer Money). While refusing repeated requests from US Ambassador Stevens to secure the US Consulate and addtional US Military Security.

                                                              • 1 vote
                                                              #16.1 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:30 PM EDT
                                                              Reply

                                                              Well here is another chance for Obama, he can, first call for Nikati, to step down.

                                                              Then when Nikati defends Lebanon against the rebels they can go to the UN and call them war crimes.

                                                              In a year or 18 months, the rebels will win and the Muslim Brotherhood will have another country under sharia law.

                                                              Think of the opportunities, he and the fat frog faced Hilary, can buy them electric cars with the money, they don't spend on security and get another 4 or 5 people killed..

                                                              Let's see two in the Border Patrol, 4 in Benghazi, seems to be a very dangerous job working for this administration.

                                                                Reply#17 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:01 AM EDT

                                                                Let them work out their problems alone. This kind of crap just causes us to spend more money that we don't have !!!

                                                                  Reply#18 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:16 AM EDT

                                                                  ...pledged to help Lebanon investigate Friday's deadly car bombing in Beirut...So as to defelct any more attention from Libya and the attack on the embassy.

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  Reply#19 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:19 AM EDT

                                                                  Of course we are sending more of our tax dollars to the Middle East. Our ignorant, arrogant leaders just can't help themselves sending money we don't have to help another conflict we have no business getting our nose stuck into.

                                                                  Just like Obama sent weapons to the Syria "rebels" who we know are nothing but Muslims thugs, taking over a government that was recognized by the U.S. and most of the civilized world, was another of his stupid moves.

                                                                  We had no business in that civil war, and we don't have business sticking our nose in this one either, or any other conflict that is a civil offence and not a threat to us.

                                                                  We don't have enough money to help each and every American with medical, housing, food, and education, but by God we always have money to stick our nose into each and every little shi*t conflict that is none of our business.


                                                                    Reply#20 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:25 AM EDT

                                                                    Why does our stupid government think it needs to meddle in these monkeys affairs? Leave them alone. Just be ready for their day of reckoning as it's coming to America soon.

                                                                      Reply#21 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:40 AM EDT

                                                                      so now we are going to have americans going into lebanon to transalate the lettering on the bomb fragments that it is from syria or iran this must mean that the lebenese cannot transalate arabic or am i missing something

                                                                        Reply#22 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:44 AM EDT

                                                                        Iran would like nothing better than to have a few American targets on the ground in Lebanon. They can attack us, then claim it was Syrian rebels. Iran is stoking the fire in both Syria and Lebanon, possibly Turkey, too, just to make sure America notices. It also helps take attention away from Tehran's efforts to build a nuclear device to use on the 'west' as soon as they can smuggle it out of the country on a Chinese freighter.

                                                                          Reply#23 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:49 AM EDT

                                                                          Oh great, yet another piss poor excuse to allow the Muslim Brotherhood "A known Terrorist Organization" to take over another country, kill all Christians, and turn it into yet another Muslim "ONLY' state.

                                                                          Don't worry Muslim Brotherhood, Hilary, Obama and Holder will be happy to help you out by bombing who ever you point the finger at.

                                                                          Coming to our country next!

                                                                            Reply#24 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:18 PM EDT

                                                                            its a shame that there are people like the aclu who will defend these muslims wish there were a way to keep these people from immigrating to the usa they hate us anyway so maybe they could just stay put in their own craphole of a country why do we need to let them build mosques that are far bigger than needed i realize that this is the land of the free but this kind of extremism should not be allowed to fester on our soil

                                                                              Reply#25 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:25 PM EDT

                                                                              You 2 days ago , a Bomb went off in Syria's Christian part of Damascus , not even one country denounced the attack , or even mentioned it , its a freaking shame .

                                                                                Reply#26 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:11 PM EDT

                                                                                A few years back when a car bomb in Beirut killed a prominent christian politician, the west and the Un investigated and the act was traced backed to Syria. So what happened? nothing. So what is the point?

                                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                                Reply#27 - Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:23 PM EDT
                                                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.