Sadly, all I can say is that all the time these Islamic fundamentalists are fighting among themselves and blowing each other to kingdom come, they are not bombing Western targets. When will they ever learn about religious tolerance?

Not since the Reformation, when Protestants and Catholics were busy decimating one another has a people been so ruthless in killing one another as contemporary Moslems. The tendency of one or another Islamic branch to attack other Moslems during pilgrimages, religious ceremonies, weddings, funerals, or every day worship is astonishing. Moreover, if one considers the war of attrition agains Kurds by other Moslems, the various massacres and wars within Syria, the Iran/Iraq war, Lebanon's civil wars, and Yemen's civil wars, it is clear that the number of Arabs and Moslems killed by other Arabs or Moslems is higher than will ever be killed by the West or the non-Moslem world. The sheer brutal regularity of Moslem on Moslem murder and mayhem belies a more deep-seated darkness in the contemporary Islamic heart. It's not a genetic thing, so please hold off on the racism charges. It's obviously something that is rooted in some structural tragedy in which the innocent, everyday folk are caught in and because of which they have to live in fear.

I still don't get why Pakistan would ban cellphones in a country of that size. They don't have remote-control toy cars or copters with transceivers/receivers? Or garage door openers, or baby room microphones at 48mhz? What about the headsets used at drive-thru restaurants?

How can you ban all civilian radio frequencies to prevent bombs from going off? They are true idiots in that hole of a country.

A roadside bomb killed at least seven people near a Shiite procession in Pakistan on Saturday, police said, while security forces were on high alert over fears of large-scale attacks on the minority sect across the country.

Sadly, it's business as usual against any minority in Pakistan.

Give me my detonator! "Hans Gruber".

Religious fanatics.

Let's give aid to more countries like this....Our government in action.

What do Muslim religious leaders have to say about all this sectarian bombing? Do they approve? Do they agree that this is the way to promote Islam?

We should not join the battles between Shiites and Sunnis in Pakistan, Syria, Iran and other places.

After their jobs are done, these ungrateful, backstabbing and Islamic religious mad people all join hands against us.

Just examine the hate marches and killer actions on video on Allah!

During Shiites vs Sunni battles, when Sunni Saudis want to be winners or Pakis, then they start their seventh century desert cry baby like weepings, pointing fingers, chest beatings, showing monies, exhibiting oil as a critical resource and blackmailing and doing dances as "strategic allies".

The seventh century bigoted Sunni Islamic religious despotic Saudi and co rulers did them before Iraqi wars on Saddam and Pakis on India.

Now Sunni Saudis, Qataris, and other Sunni Arab League rulers (look at those bigoted beasts' dresses and actions), Turkey monkies like Erdogans and others are doing similar things on Syria and Iran.

LET THEM KILL EACH OTHER. IT WILL BE LESS NUISANCE ON EARTH!

WE HAVE NO ROLES IN THEIR SHIITES VS SUNNI BATTLES.

LET THEM GO TO ISLAMIC HELL OR WHEREVER THEY WANT!

If we speak much then, then it will be bingo: jihad!!!!

Brotherhood, Brotherhood wherefore art thou in this stinking Hood? These idiots don't even know why they are killing themselves. Let's see, oh yeah they are avenging blood from some perceived insult from 5 - 10 - 20 generations ago? Let the dead stay dead. Live in the past if you want, but the world is passing you by. One would think that the Muslims would find a reason to live instead of these old reasons to die.

Say what you will about the ignorance of Christians, they generally don't use their high holy days as an opportunity to murder each other. At least, not usually.

WorldGone...

Just what we need more octomoms

Pakistani Muslims just hate everybody!

"Four children were among those killed by the bomb that police said was set off by a television remote control device because cellphones were not operational"

Where are UN and its agencies, human rights groups, Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (one of the biggest traitors operating from UK, MB spokespersons again stationed in UK), Amnesty International (talk about partisan scoundrels!), Human Rights Watch and others?

Do they start their seventh century desert dances when Sunni Saudi, Qatari and other barbaric, beastly and bigoted Sunni Arab League rulers, oil companies, Christian right and their lobbyists start dancing as in Syria, Iran and other places?

These desert dancers were quiet when Hamas was firing rockets into Israel.

After some time, they will start counting "children and women", "chemical weapons", "innocents" and "WMDs" in Iran and so on in Syria and Iran.

Why are not they doing them in Iraq as they did before each Iraqi war?

Are they dead when it comes to Iraq, Pakistan, Darfur, Sudan, Nigeria, Mali, Egypt and other places?

Sunnis have to kill Shiites because of Zionism. Shiites have to Sunnis because of George W. Bush. No one can shop at Walmart because it employs the unemployable, and the unemployable wanted more money. This holiday season, don't give a gift to charity, because you don't own that. What you own belongs to the community, and you must "give back." Thanks, pop culture, for giving us a steady stream of b*llsh*t.

Matthew 5:38-39:Jesus teaches,You've heard it said,an eye for an eye,a tooth for a tooth,but I say to you,don't resist evil,if they strike you on the right cheek,turn the other also-because if you respond in kind,evil for evil,even a smack for a smack,it can escalate into a vicious cycle, if you respond in kind you complete the cycle of an eye for an eye,a tooth for a tooth,you complete the cycle of whatsoever is sown is reaped,and that's bad seed to sow in the heart's of men,instead you nip it in the bud by not responding in kind,and you overcome evil by doing good,and most important of all you've obeyed God's word,even the Word Himself,Jesus Christ.And as a Christian you set a good example for the world to follow,otherwise you do the opposite and set a bad example,which is antiChrist.

This is why I say Thank for God's coming kingdom. What a mess this world is and it goes from bad to worse.

lets just ban them from coming to the us we dont need a bunch of muslims coming to this country to take jobs and try to change the way our society lives as a whole no mosques being built no call to prayer all the time. example in dearborn which has the largest middle east population outside of the middle east they call for people to raise the palestinian flag in support i never see them calling to raise the american flag to show how grateful they are to be living in freedom in our country

Summary of Article:

Islam is a militant religion.

Is anyone surprised really when bombs go off in Islamic countries? No, and they shouldn't be because of the aforementioned.

Here comes more of the truth, avert your eyes all who can't hear it...cited and sourced....just click the underlined words.

Other than the fact that Muslims haven't killed every
non-Muslim under their domain, there is very little else that they can point to
as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant religion. Where Islam is dominant
(as in the Middle East and Pakistan) religious minorities suffer brutal
persecution with little resistance. Where Islam is in the minority (as in
Thailand, the Philippines and Europe) there is the threat of violence if Muslim
demands are not met. Either situation seems to provide a justification for
religious terrorism, which is persistent and endemic to Islamic
fundamentalism.

The reasons are obvious and begin with the Quran. Few verses
of Islam's most sacred text can be construed to fit the contemporary virtues of
religious tolerance and universal brotherhood. Those that do are earlier
"Meccan" verses which are obviously abrogated by later ones. This is why Muslim
apologists speak of the "risks" of trying to interpret the Quran without their
"assistance" - even while claiming that it is a perfect book.

Far from being mere history or theological construct, the
violent verses of the Quran have played a key role in very real massacre and
genocide. This includes the brutal slaughter of tens of millions of Hindus for
five centuries beginning around 1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni's bloody
conquest. Both he and the later Tamerlane (Islam's Genghis Khan) slaughtered an
untold number merely for defending their temples from destruction. Buddhism was
very nearly wiped off the Indian subcontinent. Judaism and Christianity met the
same fate (albeit more slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies, including
the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe, including today's Turkey.
Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of a proud Persian people is despised by
Muslims and barely survives in modern Iran.

So ingrained is violence in the religion that Islam has never
really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with itself.

Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns, massacring
the men, raping
their women, enslaving their children, and taking the property of others as his
own. On several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the besieged
inhabitants and even butchered captives.
He actually inspired his followers to battle when they did not feel it was right
to fight, promising them slaves and booty if they did and threatening them with
Hell if they did not. Muhammad allowed his men to rape traumatized women
captured in battle, usually on the very day their husbands and family members
were slaughtered.

It is important to emphasize that, for the most part, Muslim
armies waged aggressive campaigns, and the religion's most dramatic
military conquests were made by the actual companions of Muhammad in the decades
following his death. The early Islamic principle of warfare was that the
civilian population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men executed, women and
children taken as slaves) if they defended themselves. Although modern
apologists often claim that Muslims are only supposed to attack in self-defense,
this is an oxymoron that is flatly
contradicted by the accounts of Islamic historians and others that go back
to the time of Muhammad.

Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were completely
obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived in Medina. Their leader
opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged by a Meccan army that was
sent to take revenge for Muhammad's deadly caravan raids. The tribe killed no
one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the
Meccans had been turned back. Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of
the Qurayza beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the
captives himself (what Muslim apologists might refer to as "same day
marriage").

One of Islam's most revered modern scholars, Sheikh Yusuf
al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: "In the Jihad which you are
seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This type of Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is invading other
[countries] in order to spread the word of
Islam and to remove obstacles standing in its way." Elsewhere, he
notes: "Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s religion and
it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy all obstacles in the form
of institutions and traditions … it attacks institutions and traditions to
release human beings from their poisonous influences, which distort human nature
and curtail human freedom. Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the
defense of the 'homeland of Islam' diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of
life."

The widely respected Dictionary of Islam
defines Jihad as "A religious war with those who are unbelievers in the
mission of Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in the
Qur'an and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined specially for
the purpose of advancing Islam and of repelling evil from Muslims…[Quoting from
the Hanafi school, Hedaya, 2:140, 141.], "The destruction of the sword is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears
from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this
effect."

Muhammad's failure to leave a clear line of succession
resulted in perpetual internal war following his death. Those who knew him best
first fought to keep remote tribes from leaving Islam and reverting to their
preferred religion (the Ridda or 'Apostasy wars'). Then, within the closer
community, early Meccan converts battled later ones. Hostility developed
between those immigrants who had traveled with Muhammad to Mecca and the Ansar
at Medina who had helped them settle in. Finally there was a violent struggle
within Muhammad's own family between his favorite wife and favorite daughter - a
jagged schism that has left Shias and Sunnis at each others' throats to this
day.

The strangest and most untrue thing that can be said about
Islam is that it is a Religion of Peace. If every standard by which the West is
judged and condemned (slavery, imperialism, intolerance, misogyny, sexual
repression, warfare...) were applied equally to Islam, the verdict would be
devastating. Islam never gives up what it conquers, be it religion, culture,
language or life. Neither does it make apologies or any real effort at moral
progress. It is the least open to dialogue and the most self-absorbed. It is
convinced of its own perfection, yet brutally shuns self-examination and
represses criticism.

This is what makes the Quran's verses of violence so
dangerous. They are given the weight of divine command. While Muslim
terrorists take them as literally as anything else in their holy book, and
understand that Islam is incomplete without Jihad, moderates offer little to
contradict them - outside of opinion. Indeed, what do they have? Speaking of
peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when every twelfth verse of
Islam's holiest book either speaks to Allah's hatred for non-Muslims or calls
for their death, forced conversion, or subjugation, it's little wonder that
sympathy for terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the
broader community - even if most Muslims personally prefer not to interpret
their religion in this way.

Although scholars like Ibn Khaldun, one of Islam's most
respected philosophers, understood that "the holy war is a religious duty,
because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to)
convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force", many other
Muslims are either unaware or willfully ignorant of the Quran's near absence of
verses that preach universal non-violence. Their understanding of Islam comes
from what they are taught by others. In the West, it is typical for believers
to think that their religion must be like Christianity - preaching the New
Testament virtues of peace, love, and tolerance - because Muslims are taught
that Islam is supposed to be superior in
every way. They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to learn that the
evidence of the Quran and the bloody history of Islam are very much in
contradiction to this.

Others simply accept the violence. In 1991, a Palestinian
couple in America was convicted of stabbing their daughter to death for being
too Westernized. A family friend came to their defense, excoriating the jury
for not understanding the "culture", claiming that the father was merely
following "the religion" and saying that the couple had to "discipline their
daughter or lose respect." (source).
In 2011, unrepentant Palestinian terrorists, responsible for the brutal murders
of civilians, women and children explicitly in
the name of Allah were treated to a luxurious "holy pilgrimage" to Mecca by the
Saudi king - without a single Muslim voice raised in protest.

For their part, Western liberals would do well not to
sacrifice critical thinking to the god of political correctness, or look for
reasons to bring other religion down to the level of Islam merely to avoid the
existential truth that this it is both different and dangerous.

There are just too many Muslims who take the Quran
literally... and too many others who couldn't care less about the violence done
in the name of Islam.

And on a final note, to those who say I post this over and over again and it gets boring or whatever, I am aware I post it over and over again, but there is only one truth and it is worth learning. Especially when it comes to a religion that preaches violence against ANY non-muslim.

Those who don't believe any of this or that think Islam is "moderate" (a term, which even if it has to be applied indicates a militant religion, just to what degree) or wants to look at a "moderate" Islamic country, go to Mecca in Saudi Arabia...try to anyway. A non-muslim can't even fly in an airplane over Mecca. Try to pray in Saudi Arabia to anyone but Allah. The penalty for which is death.

Instead of spending time chastizing or defending Susan Rice, let's waste some time determining which administration allowed Pakistan develope a nuclear bomb. If the radical sunnis (capital "s" omitted) get a hold of the bomb we are going to find out that we had better retain a good supply of ours.

I thought Obama defeated al-Qaeda? That is what he said on the campaign trail. Another lie from Obama. Yes he did lie because the article said the attack was carried out in Dera Ismail Khan in Pakistan's northwest, a stronghold of al-Qaeda-linked Sunni militant groups. If al-Qaeda was defeated by Obama than how can the article be true.

Sunni Saudis are the primary culprits for Sunni Islamic extremism becoming most dangerous in the world. Pakis have been providing foot soldiers.

Pakis and Sunni Saudis are responsible for 80 percent of world problems.

Use immediate substitutes for oil and bankrupt Sunni Saudis. Let us send them back to thier desert camel riding days.

I am so sick of these morons,I'm with the poster that said arm them to the teeth and let the chips fall where they may! At 63 I'm ready to enjoy what's left of my life. I don't give an anal expulsion about these people or their religion! I say get the hell out and let them kill themselves! Oh , I can't wait for those idiot afgan's to screw the chinese on some contract for their" precious metals" That will be a real eye opening experience for allah and the boy's! The chinese don't fool around,just ask the north korean's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why arnt "we" controling BOMB MATERIAL?? no, we chose controling POT whitch hurts no one !!! Wake up AMERICA>

US and allies have to take out Paki nukes and destroy Paki nuke facilities. For Islamic militants: enemies are US, Jews, West/Christians, India and so on and on in that order.

Pakistan is already having bloody civil wars and they will be only worse.

The nukes may fall into anyone's hands including most rabid Islamic militant haters and killers.

For those who are screaming of WMDs in Iran and so on: they can easily get them from Pakistan.

Interesting how the media doesn't say a word about the innocent women and children blown to pieces by the Taliban, but the minute Israel or America kills an innocent person they can't stop talking about it.