Small tsunami waves hit Japan after 7.3-magnitude earthquake

A 7.3-magnitude quake strikes off Japan's northeastern coast, temporarily triggering some tsunami waves reaching up to three feet, but there was no concern of a widespread tsunami. TODAY's Erica Hill reports.

Updated at 5:40 a.m. ET: Tsunami waves up to 3 feet high hit the coast of Japan Friday, after a strong earthquake in the sea that shook buildings 300 miles away in Tokyo.


The temblor was registered at a magnitude of 7.3 and struck at 5:18 p.m. local time (3:18 a.m. ET), according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

The earthquake hit in the same area as the devastating quake and tsunami in March last year that killed nearly 20,000 people and triggered the world's worst nuclear crisis in 25 years.

Friday's quake struck about 200 miles southeast of Kamaishi, the USGS said. The epicenter was 6.2 miles beneath the seabed, according to the Japan Meteorological Agency.

Buildings in Tokyo swayed for at least several minutes, but there were no early reports of damage or injuries.

Coastal residents told to flee to higher ground
NHK television broke off regular programming to warn that a strong quake was due to hit shortly before the impact was felt. Afterward, the announcer repeatedly urged all near the coast to flee to higher ground.

The quake triggered a tsunami warning for the Miyagi Prefecture, which was at the center of the 2011 disaster. It also sparked tsunami advisories for Pacific Coast areas of several other prefectures.

But by 5:20 a.m. ET, two hours after the quake, the Japan Meteorological Agency had canceled all tsunami advisories and warnings.

USGS via EPA

A handout image released by the U.S. Geological Survey shows the location of Friday's earthquake off the northeast coast of Japan.

Still, a batch of tsunami waves, measuring about 3 feet tall, hit the town of Ishinomaki, in Miyagi Prefecture, about an hour after the earthquake, according to Japanese television. Another tsunami wave, measuring about a foot tall, was detected at Ofunato.

Complete World coverage on NBCNews.com

"I was in the center of the city the very moment the earthquake struck. I immediately jumped into the car and started running away towards the mountains. I'm still hiding inside the car," Ishinomaki resident Chikako Iwai told Reuters.

"I have the radio on and they say the cars are still stuck in the traffic. I'm planning to stay here for the next couple of hours," Iwai said.

A 6.2-magnitude aftershock struck at about 3:31 a.m. ET, but no damage or injuries were immediately reported.

Kyodo News via AP

People crowd at Sendai railway station in Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, on Friday after the 7.3-magnitude earthquake disrupted train services.

Devastating 2011 quake and tsunami
The magnitude-9.0 earthquake and ensuing tsunami that slammed into northeastern Japan on March 11, 2011 devastated much of the coast.

All but two of Japan's nuclear plants were shut down for checks after the earthquake and tsunami caused meltdowns at the Fukushima nuclear plant in the worst nuclear disaster since the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. 

Worker at tsunami-hit Fukushima nuclear plant: Firm sent crews into danger

The government declared in December that the disaster was under control, but much of the area is still free of population.

Tokyo Electric Power, the operator of the Fukushima nuclear plant, reported no irregularities at its nuclear plants after Friday's quake.

Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda canceled campaigning in Tokyo ahead of a Dec. 16 election and was on his way back to his office, but there was no immediate plan to hold a special cabinet meeting.

NBC News' Arata Yamamoto, The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

More world stories from NBC News:

Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook



 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

Not another one...

  • 1 vote
#1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 3:57 AM EST

Everyone get to high ground... please... ; ;

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:04 AM EST

You are not safe anywhere on this planet...

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 5:19 AM EST

Not for nothin' here but in my lifetime, I haven't seen so many earth moving situations happen within a couple years spread.

Seems there has been an amazing amount of geographical situations going on that if they were any worse, could kill thousands. From Hurricanes and Tornado's to Earthquakes and Tsunami's.

I have a strange feeling that the "BIG" one is yet to come and soon. Guess if this is true & if it does indeed happen, I'd wish then that I was one of those doomsday prepares that I feel are over doing it.

The Japanese must always be on edge after the Tsunami that hit last year. I can imagine what they go through after each one of these quakes and those Tsunami sirens go off. Jumping out of bed, grabbing what they can and taking off in their cars on the routes they've been practicing for just such a situation...

  • 6 votes
#1.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:24 AM EST

The plain simple fact of the matter is that there is no unusually large number of earthquakes this year (or the last couple of years).

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:31 AM EST

More to come i would move

    #1.5 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:22 AM EST

    HAARP and weather control

      #1.6 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:26 AM EST

      @ gumps The whole world is shifting. You aint seen nothing yet. The world is off center.

      • 1 vote
      #1.7 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:43 AM EST

      The whole world is shifting? Have you just learned this? Golly, plate tectonic theory has been around for decades - I guess its better late than never for catching up. As for the world being "off center"- what the Hell does that mean? The earth has always been tilted on its axis...

      • 4 votes
      #1.8 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:16 AM EST

      3 foot waves is a calm day here on Lake Michigan.

      • 3 votes
      #1.9 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:29 AM EST

      Japan really should go German's way to abandon nuke energy gradually and use alternative energy resources instead. their entire island is in quake zone, and there's always the danger of that causing nuke leak and contamination.

      • 1 vote
      #1.10 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 10:35 AM EST

      Karma is Stalking Japan.

        #1.11 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:12 AM EST

        @ANNIE, there is a major difference between a "wave" and a tsunami.

        A wave is just that, it has a peek and a valley.

        A tsunami is an abrupt increase in the level of water that does not stop.

        @Mary Jones, If the earth was not "off center" we would not have the seasons.

        @Grumps, Ding,Ding,Ding, correct.

        However, we have seen in earth records that nature can be a MAJOR player.

        Expect a very large catastrophe, probably in the next 25 years.

        Earthquake, super volcano or meteor strike, any of which are likely.

        (not to mention the crap people pull)

        • 3 votes
        #1.12 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:13 AM EST

        Oh, thanks for setting us all straight Monad; as if we didn't know. Ever hear of just a conversational figure of speech, Nostradamus?

        • 4 votes
        #1.13 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:56 AM EST

        Michel de Nostredame[1] (14 or 21 December 1503[2] – 2 July 1566), usually Latinised as Nostradamus, was a French apothecary and reputed seer who published collections of prophecies that have since become famous worldwide. He is best known for his book Les Propheties (The Prophecies), the first edition of which appeared in 1555.

        Not even close.

        I never said I was a SEER.

        Perhaps you meant "Einstein" as his name is usually invoked to purport excessive intelligence.

        I am not that intelligent, but I know that a 3 foot tsunami is a potential disaster.

        • 2 votes
        #1.14 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 12:06 PM EST

        wonder if quakes are a result of something that happened years ago that might have changed the plates, feel bad for these people

          #1.15 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 12:42 PM EST

          The plain simple fact of the matter is that there is no unusually large number of earthquakes this year (or the last couple of years).

          References, Gumps? Just because it's your opinion doesn't mean a thing if you can't support it with published data.

            #1.16 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 1:26 PM EST

            We continue to be asked by many people throughout the world if earthquakes are on the increase. Although it may seem that we are having more earthquakes, earthquakes of magnitude 7.0 or greater have remained fairly constant.

            A partial explanation may lie in the fact that in the last twenty years, we have definitely had an increase in the number of earthquakes we have been able to locate each year. This is because of the tremendous increase in the number of seismograph stations in the world and the many improvements in global communications. In 1931, there were about 350 stations operating in the world; today, there are more than 8,000 stations and the data now comes in rapidly from these stations by electronic mail, internet and satellite. This increase in the number of stations and the more timely receipt of data has allowed us and other seismological centers to locate earthquakes more rapidly and to locate many small earthquakes which were undetected in earlier years. The NEIC now locates about 20,000 earthquakes each year or approximately 50 per day. Also, because of the improvements in communications and the increased interest in the environment and natural disasters, the public now learns about more earthquakes.

            According to long-term records (since about 1900), we expect about 17 major earthquakes (7.0 - 7.9) and one great earthquake (8.0 or above) in any given year.

            from usgs...

              #1.17 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 1:48 PM EST

              AtticusRules, I'm sorry - I thought you'd be capable of doing a little basic research on your own instead of being spoon fed. For your sake, here you go:

              http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/year/eqstats.php

                #1.18 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 1:53 PM EST

                Hey, 12/21/12 is just around the corner!!

                  #1.19 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 2:13 PM EST

                  And so is 12/22, 12/23, 12/24,....

                  • 1 vote
                  #1.20 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:34 PM EST

                  And so is 12/22, 12/23, 12/24,....

                  LOL!

                  Happy New Year!!!!

                    #1.21 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:02 PM EST
                    Reply

                    Seriously,I do feel for them. :(

                    • 7 votes
                    Reply#2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:00 AM EST

                    I don't want to see anyone injured or killed. But isn't it ironic ... 71 years ago today Pearl Harbor was bombed. May we never forget our own fallen that day!

                    • 2 votes
                    #2.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:16 AM EST

                    No, it is not ironic - the two events are completely unrelated.

                    • 4 votes
                    #2.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:18 AM EST

                    How do you know?? Whoooooo

                    • 1 vote
                    #2.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:13 AM EST

                    Gumps - do you even know what "ironic" means?

                      #2.4 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 1:33 PM EST

                      AtticusRules - golly, I have to look up definitions for you as well:

                      Something is ironic if the result is the opposite of what was intended, as taken from:

                      http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ironic

                      My original statement stands - the two events are unrelated and therefore one could not reasonable infer that an attack on Pearl Harbor would not cause an earthquake/tsunami decades into the future.

                      • 2 votes
                      #2.5 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 1:58 PM EST

                      yeahhhhhh thats not how you use the word ironic. there's nothing ironic about a natural disaster.

                        #2.6 - Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:11 PM EST
                        Reply

                        I hope this one missed any inhabited areas, and there's no damage or injuries. Japan has had enough, they deserve a break. Best wishes on a good outcome.

                        • 5 votes
                        Reply#3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:09 AM EST

                        Dude, they were 3 foot waves. Not exactly epic proportions...

                        • 1 vote
                        #3.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 8:14 AM EST

                        when will it end-2085868

                        Dude, they were 3 foot waves. Not exactly epic proportions...

                        May want to check the times between your post and Freedom4Everyone's. Freedom posted right when the news came out, not after they updated information stating the waves were only 3ft high.

                        Luckily they didn't get the waves they were estimating. Always good to have an emergency plan regardless if later you find out that some of the warnings turned out to be minor.

                        • 2 votes
                        #3.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:35 AM EST

                        Glad to hear there was no significant waves, and no damage.

                        Dude, they were 3 foot waves. Not exactly epic proportions...

                        Dude, these stories get updated and changed. The waves hadnt hit when I posted that, the Earthquake had just been reported.

                        • 1 vote
                        #3.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 2:33 PM EST
                        Reply

                        I hope a tsunami has not been triggered, but if so, I pray that the toll will be low.

                        The ring of fire...a scary place to be.

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#4 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:18 AM EST

                        Did you read the article?

                        • 3 votes
                        #4.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:32 AM EST

                        Obviously not. Too small to even surf :-)...

                        • 2 votes
                        #4.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 8:15 AM EST

                        Gumps and when will it end,

                        Did you even read what time NyNy made that post? Obviously not.

                        • 3 votes
                        #4.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 12:14 PM EST
                        Reply

                        So many of us think they can dominate and control the planet. Their arrogance makes them fools.

                        I'm afraid quite the opposite is reality.

                        I remember feeling and hearing a massive rock (hundreds of feet in diameter) 'clunk' under my feet and bubbles appeared in the reservoir I was camping at. That was a healthy lesson that I am merely another 'ant' living on it's surface.

                        People get reminders like this all around the world, like this article.

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#5 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:19 AM EST

                        I think everyone should have to take a college level Geology class. It's quite educational, and freaks you the heck out. Such a volatile planet we live on. We've been lucky so far, and the earth is just getting warmed up for another round of clearing her throat...

                        • 9 votes
                        #5.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:23 AM EST

                        Agreed...either that, or just pay attention for 15 minutes of "Earth Science" class in high school. Both the planet and everything on it are constantly in motion- I'm no scientist, but I learned enough to know that. Japan, by the way, had better not be the only one watching for a tsunami- that deal could pretty much go in any direction.

                        • 7 votes
                        #5.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:38 AM EST

                        Phil is right, we are just ants on the surface. We can still do a lot of damage, but for the rest of the world, it can do damage right back. We have no way to control most of what goes on, we must ride it out. Our planet is a living, breathing, moving, and shaking place. We just need to roll with the punches.

                        Best wishes to the folks in Japan, I know it must be terribly scary.

                        • 1 vote
                        #5.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:57 AM EST

                        Ants?

                        Shades of "The Dome" by Steven King....in my humble opinion his best work since "The Stand".... great read....

                          #5.4 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 12:26 PM EST
                          Reply

                          I live in Yokohama quite far from the Tohoku area but I felt it. It was quite strong. You just never get used to it. I just turn off the gas stove and open the doors. scarey!!! No casualties please!!!

                          • 7 votes
                          Reply#6 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:35 AM EST

                          Sending good vibes your way, Jean, and to all who might be affected. I too hope no casualties.

                          • 5 votes
                          #6.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 5:16 AM EST

                          thanks Lisa. It looks like it was not too bad.

                          • 3 votes
                          #6.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:12 AM EST
                          Reply

                          Well hopefully with the Tsunamis being just 3 ft, there will be few if any casualties. I've been to Japan, it's a wonderful place. Last years Tsunami couldn't have happened to a lesser deserving people, I hope everyone there is safe!

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#7 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 5:18 AM EST

                          "3 feet" is actually pretty misleading. It's not just the height of the waves, but the power behind them. Those are still very strong waves that could do plenty of damage to someone... if they didn't get out of the way.

                          Thankfully, the Japanese know to do that, but there have been other places where people have gone to 'see the big waves' in this kind of situation and die as a result.

                          So, yeah, people were probably okay, but I do think it's important to get away from thinking of tsunamis in terms of how many feet tall they are.... it's not helpful.

                            #7.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 4:55 PM EST
                            Reply

                            In Tokyo when the earthquake hit. On the sixth floor, the building was shaking but nothing like March 11 of last year.

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#8 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 5:22 AM EST

                            Jeez what are the ODDS that this happens again! That last big earthquake hit last year and now this one! I hope everyone is safe in Japan! My thoughts go out to everyone there!

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#9 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 5:28 AM EST

                            Japan is right near several major tectonic plate boundaries. Heck, the entire island chain is the result of tectonic plates moving against each other. They have a long history of earthquakes. So, yeah, the odds are pretty good that they'd get another quake near the same place. As long as there are no casualties, it's not that big of a deal.

                            That said, Japan is a pretty cool country. It's not without it's flaws but what place isn't. I'm glad for the people there that this wasn't another big disaster. I'm hoping to take a vacation next year and visit Japan again.

                              #9.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:07 AM EST
                              Reply

                              Lotta Bad Vibes in Japan! HooDiGo!

                                Reply#10 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:13 AM EST

                                What ever happened to the terms 'tidal wave' and 'dust storm'? Now it's tsunami and haboob. Give me a break. Fear mongars burning the midnight oil. 5 days until the end of the Mayan world as we know it.

                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#11 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:26 AM EST

                                The term "tidal wave" is incorrect as it has nothing to do with the tides. This has been pointed out for decades. As for haboob, I first heard of it while living in Arizona - it is an arabic word, meaning violent windstorm. Of course, many right wing lunatics living in Arizona object to the local weatherman using this word because it originated in the middle east. I suspect you are one of those...

                                • 1 vote
                                #11.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:39 AM EST

                                DadinAZ, Gumps,

                                You both make good points. On one hand, "tidal wave" is less descriptive of the phenomenon than "tsunami". On the other hand, not many of the PC crowd hollered so much about saving wetlands and rain forests when they were swamps and jungles.

                                • 4 votes
                                #11.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:50 AM EST

                                Except that "tsunami" and "haboob" aren't politically correct words.

                                A politically correct version of tsunami would be, "temporary oceanic volume displacement". Or some such nonsense.

                                • 1 vote
                                #11.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:10 AM EST

                                Tsunami is very appropriate terminology here as it is a Japanese word and the tsunami hit Japan.

                                tsu·na·mi (ts-näm)

                                n. pl. tsu·na·mis
                                A very large ocean wave caused by an underwater earthquake or volcanic eruption.

                                [Japanese : tsu, port + nami, wave.]

                                • 1 vote
                                #11.4 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:26 AM EST
                                Reply

                                Last year we sent in our military (and tax dollars) to aid Japan. Last month, when Sandy hit the east coast, Japan contributed $0 to help in the recovery.

                                We're already spending billions a year (money we have to borrow from the Japanese) in order to provide for their defense. Let's not spend even more using our world's policeman forces to become the Rec Cross of the world too.

                                A broke economic has-been shouldn't be subsidizing our creditors and economic competition.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#12 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:35 AM EST

                                biff johnson-2053495

                                http://howell.patch.com/articles/japan-ambassador-donates-500k-to-hurricane-sandy-victims-ef6fc646

                                Look it up, it takes 5 seconds to find. Japan sent $500,000 to hurricane Sandy relief efforts.

                                Japan Donates $500K to Hurricane Sandy Victims

                                While on a tour of New Jersey, Japan Ambassador stopped in Freehold and announced a donation to help rebuild New Jersey.

                                • 1 vote
                                #12.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 8:23 AM EST

                                Never heard of it. What Foreign country ever does Anyhting for the U.S.? They all have their hands out looking for something from Uncle Sucker.

                                • 1 vote
                                #12.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:15 AM EST
                                • 1 vote
                                #12.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 12:01 PM EST

                                Starbuck - thanks for posting the links!

                                • 1 vote
                                #12.4 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 3:08 PM EST

                                1. Your bigotry is showing.

                                2. Japan actually did contribute to Sandy, and more so for Katrina.

                                3. Part of the reason why we 'defend' Japan is because we forced them to sign a treaty which has resulted in them only having defensive forces, with a constitutional policy of pacifism.

                                4. We don't defend Japan out of altruism. It's in our national interest, and we do it despite the fact that the people in the area don't want us there. We wouldn't be very quick to let them ask us to leave, either.

                                5. If our troops and ships are in a position to easily help out in any situation of crisis (natural disaster, terrorist attack, etc.) in any country, I'm for it. The costs are minimal when the troops are nearby and already out to sea, and the goodwill we receive will pay off in dividends for a long time to come. Hell, if a major earth quake struck Russia, Iran or North Korea and tens of thousands of lives were at stake, I'd even be willing to let our forces help out them, if they'd take it! (Though I doubt they would.)

                                I'm not sure this situation rises to that level -- Japan is well prepared for earth quakes of this size and its people are well trained to deal with them -- but we should of course extend offers of goodwill when the circumstances arise. Other countries have, in fact, helped us in the past, too.

                                • 1 vote
                                #12.5 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 5:05 PM EST

                                so quick to demonize japan without even knowing the facts! japan did contribute to sandy relief and i believe they donated to katrina relief as well.

                                  #12.6 - Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:15 PM EST
                                  Reply

                                  Way to go biff - bringing a political rant into an unrelated discussion.

                                    Reply#13 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:41 AM EST

                                    Typhoons, earthquakes, storms off the coast of California. Maybe December 21, 2012 just might loom as the big one. Let's hope not.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#14 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:07 AM EST

                                    Or maybe you just believe in superstitious nonsense.

                                      #14.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:12 AM EST
                                      Reply

                                      We are fortunate indeed that Repugnicans failed to win in November. A big quake is coming soon to the Northwest, and I shudder to think what insurance companies could do if Repugnicans loosened regulations and oversight.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#15 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:40 AM EST

                                      OK, Carnac the Magnificent, tell us when this big quake is coming in actual calendar terms, instead of "soon". To me, the word "soon" can be one day short of "never".

                                        #15.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 8:21 AM EST

                                        When Fla was hit hard it all most put Allstate out of business.They could not pay the people back to rebuild the Insurance company made every excuse not to pay the people..Insurance = scam...

                                          #15.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 8:55 AM EST

                                          When Fla was hit hard it all most (sic) put Allstate out of business.

                                          Hardly. Insurance companies have enough reserves to handle claims. Not all Allstate customers live in Florida.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #15.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:23 AM EST

                                          Allstate has stated intentions of reducing its exposure in hurricane-prone Florida. In November 2006, Allstate did not renew 120,000 policies that were expiring at that time. Governor Charlie Crist and the Florida Cabinet passed a 90-day emergency order to temporarily prevent insurance companies from nonrenewing policies.[35] On February 20, 2007, Florida Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty clarified the order, stating that insurance companies can nonrenew policies if they satisfy certain conditions, including filing new, lower rates with the state and give customers 100 days’ notice.

                                          It drove down profits to the point they would not renew policies.

                                            #15.4 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:46 AM EST

                                            But it did not almost put Allstate out of business as paragus asserted.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #15.5 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 2:01 PM EST

                                            No, It did not. In all probability, someone got a bonus for figuring out how to shortchange their clientele.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #15.6 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 3:02 PM EST

                                            tell us when this big quake is coming in actual calendar terms, instead of "soon"

                                            Unfortunately, no one can give the exact timing, except that it's a matter of "when," not "if." In recent years, there has already been a series of small quakes, which typically precede the big one. Pressure is building up along the many sizable tectonic faults as we speak. I wouldn't be surprised if there's an all-in-one disaster that includes Mt. St. Helen's-type explosions of the remaining volcanoes, along with tsunamis of unprecedented magnitude washing away miles of coastal communities. It might even get the roaches.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #15.7 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:42 PM EST

                                            You're not saying anything that we didn't already know - from watching the Discovery Channel. But a series of small quakes does not necessarily mean that a large one is coming - each small quake can relieve a little pressure. But what causes a large quake is when the plates get hung up and suddenly break free. Again, this is nothing new. You're orignal post implied that a major disaster in the northwest is imminent - or at least within the next 5 years, given that Mitt lost. I'm willing to bet that no such disaster will occur in that timeframe.

                                              #15.8 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 8:23 PM EST
                                              Reply

                                              Bet that was scary .....

                                                Reply#16 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 7:43 AM EST

                                                Hopefully this earthquake will push the Japanese away from the major political parties which are owned by the powerful nuclear lobby which wants to reopen the 48 reactors which have been closed since the triple meltdown of 3/11. There is a new political party in Japan which wants to follow Germany's lead and phase out of nuclear for renewables by 2022. Fukushima is still a daily problem in the country with over 100K people having lost their homes. After 18 months of work, over 80% of the residences in the region around the plant have not been decontaminated and the Fukushima site is releasing more radiation now than it was a year ago. Japan's economy did not go into a recession from closing these reactors, nor were there blackouts as the nuclear industry predicted. For more history on lies told by the Japanese nuclear industry see

                                                  Reply#17 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 8:36 AM EST

                                                  Hopefully this earthquake will push the Japanese away from the major political parties which are owned by the powerful nuclear lobby which wants to reopen the 48 reactors which have been closed since the triple meltdown of 3/11. There is a new political party in Japan which wants to follow Germany's lead and phase out of nuclear for renewables by 2022.    Fukushima is still a daily problem in the country with over 100K people having lost their homes.  After 18 months of work, over 80% of the residences in the region around the plant have not been decontaminated and the Fukushima site is releasing more radiation now than it was a year ago.  Japan's economy did not go into a recession from closing these reactors, nor were there blackouts as the nuclear industry predicted. For more history on lies told by the Japanese nuclear industry see funologist.org

                                                    Reply#18 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 8:38 AM EST

                                                    3-foot waves? is this correct?

                                                      Reply#19 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:07 AM EST

                                                      I've encountered bigger waves in Mrytle Beach.

                                                        #19.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 10:40 AM EST

                                                        I reiterate, a "wave" and a tsunami are NOT the same thing.

                                                        Imagine a "wave" that never stops.

                                                        If a 3 foot tsunami hit Florida, it would go half way across the state.

                                                        It has a peek but no valley.

                                                        It is constantly followed by more water at the same level.

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #19.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:32 AM EST
                                                        Reply

                                                        LOVE FOR JAPAN...thats my vibe Im sending to them....stop tampering with the weather you buggers! leave Japan alone!

                                                          Reply#20 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:17 AM EST

                                                          Maybe they'll think TWICE now before bombing a peaceful nation like Hawaii.

                                                          December 7 sports fans....Remember Pearl Harbor!

                                                            Reply#21 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:25 AM EST

                                                            "Remember Pearl Harbor"? Really? I hope you're just trolling, or maybe I missed the joke, that has to be it. Last time I checked, we haven't been enemies with Japan since 1945. With no sign of warlike intentions having emerged from Japan towards us ever since. We don't live in the same political world that existed 70 years ago. Why exactly do you need to wave the flag of jingoism towards Japan now? Maybe we should "Remember Lexington and Concord!" too, and maintain hostilities towards Britain as well. Heck, we could take it all the way back to Biblical times. Oh, wait...

                                                            • 2 votes
                                                            #21.1 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 12:30 PM EST

                                                            Tim - good one!

                                                              #21.2 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 1:09 PM EST

                                                              Tim: you my freind are an IDIOT. Of course it's a joke how old are you? Idiot.

                                                                #21.3 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 2:21 PM EST

                                                                Well said Tim!

                                                                  #21.4 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 2:24 PM EST
                                                                  Reply

                                                                  stop tampering with the weather you buggers! leave Japan alone!

                                                                  Earthquakes are not caused by the weather.

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  Reply#22 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 9:25 AM EST

                                                                  It's all Obama's fault. There I said it. I feel much better!

                                                                    Reply#23 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 10:29 AM EST

                                                                    3 Foot Tsunami? Wow, that's got to be devasting. I've encountered bigger waves in Mrytle Beach.

                                                                      Reply#24 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 10:38 AM EST

                                                                      a tsunami is different from a wave in that it picks up a lot of momentum. while 3 feet may seem small, with a tsunami's speed and strength, the results could actually be pretty scary.

                                                                        #24.1 - Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:19 PM EST
                                                                        Reply

                                                                        Hopefully reactor 4 suffered no additional structural damage.

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        Reply#25 - Fri Dec 7, 2012 11:00 AM EST
                                                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.