150 years old and still running late: London's Tube celebrates landmark anniversary

London's Tube network was established 150 years ago this week. From its debut in 1863 to providing protection from Nazi bombs and now Oyster cards, ITV's Ria Chatterjee reports on how the world's first subway system has evolved.

LONDON -- Unexplained delays, equipment failures and chronic rush-hour overcrowding are among the reasons Londoners have a love-hate relationship with their remarkable subway system, dubbed the Tube.

But it was day of gratitude for commuters - and tourists - on Wednesday as the creaking London Underground celebrated its 150th birthday.

It is a remarkable milestone for the network, carved from the hot clay beneath London’s streets and which survived the bombs of World War Two.

Abraham Lincoln was President when the world’s first subterranean passenger service opened between Paddington and Farringdon on Jan. 9, 1863.

Most of the original station building is still in use at Farringdon, where passengers on Wednesday reflected on the history of the Tube.

Science & Society Picture Librar / via Getty Images

Construction of the first section of London's Tube began in the 1860s.

“The old Circle Line carriages could do with being pensioned-off,”  Dave Rodgers, 54, told NBC News. “Some of them look like they are 150 years old. Perhaps they are originals.”

Owen Blake, a 50-year-old printer, was waiting for his train home after a night shift. “I’ve used the Underground all my life,” he said. “As a teenager, it was wonderful to be able to travel from Islington to other places across London. You felt connected, you could go anywhere.”

Peter Jeary, NBC News

Commuters on Wednesday at Farringdon, one of the original London Underground stations.

But Leanne McCabe, a 24-year-old healthcare worker, spoke for many when she said: “I only travel once a month on the Tube, but they always seem to be doing engineering work on the line.”

Upgrading a system whose core infrastructure is more than a century old is a tough task for planners and engineers.

At its start, steam trains ferried carriages between the affluent suburbs of Victorian west London and the money-making heart of the City financial district.

Despite early hazards for passengers such as asphyxiation from smoke and petty crime, it proved a tremendous success, with 26,000 daily users within six months of opening.

The privately funded network grew rapidly, adding new lines and stations as railway entrepreneurs – and tunneling engineers - found there were profits to be made by digging deep under London.

By the time the New York subway opened in 1904, London had six underground lines and was on track to be powered entirely by electricity.

Peter Jeary, NBC News

Steam locomotives and carriages were replaced by electric trains on London's Underground at the turn of the 20th century.

By opening up London’s suburbs to fast, efficient mass transit, the Underground helped shape the way the city grew. New communities grew up around areas connected by the Tube -- as it became known by 1890 in honor of its increasingly deep and narrow tunnels. The network’s expansion at the turn of the 20th century linked the capital’s population with new opportunities for work and leisure.

A record 1.171 billion passenger journeys were made during the 2011-12 financial year, across a city-run network that now covers 249 miles and connects 270 stations on 12 lines – arteries through which London’s lifeblood flows.

A tourist attraction in its own right, it is frequently featured in popular culture, such as the James Bond movie "Skyfall," the Sherlock Holmes tales and songs by The Jam and Duffy – a legacy the pioneers could have never imagined.

“Today of all days, learn to love the Tube,” implored railway historian Christian Wolmar in Wednesday’s London Evening Standard newspaper. “Marvel at the diversity of people from all classes and of all ages who rely on it, day in, day out.”

 

 

 

Discuss this post

It might be old, but there' still a 150 year old tunnel through the ground. That's pretty well proven itself. From that, the rest can be rehabilitated as needed.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 11:49 AM EST

And the tube is so clean compaired to ours (NYC) And ours smells soooo bad! But on the positive side, you usually don't have to wait too long for a train...

    #1.2 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 4:10 PM EST
    Reply

    One more proof that investment in the infrastructure is a good investment

    • 6 votes
    Reply#2 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 11:59 AM EST

    If only the USA would actually invest in infrastructure. Our "investments" are typically geared towards politically connected contractors and politically connected labor unions. Silly outdated laws such as Davis Bacon bloat each and every construction project. Environmental impact studies slow down and impede progress at every turn.

    Me doubts the tube could get built in today's Nanny State London or in New York City.

    • 6 votes
    #2.1 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 12:29 PM EST

    I work in the environmental industry and see the crumbling water and sewer installations everywhere. We could make a major reduction in water use and make our rivers and lakes much cleaner if we were willing to spend some money fixing that segment of infrastructure.

    • 6 votes
    #2.2 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 12:53 PM EST

    Max^108

    I work in the environmental industry

    "Industry" implies manufacturing. What do you make?

    • 1 vote
    #2.3 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 12:59 PM EST

    Industry in the broad sense of the term. I work for an environmental testing lab. We mostly work for cities and industrial users. I'm not rooting for investing in infrastructure because it would help our company. It is an impartial observation.

    • 3 votes
    #2.4 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 2:19 PM EST

    "environmental industry" would imply they make "global warming" and such...

    • 1 vote
    #2.5 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:54 AM EST

    Seriously Denver? Is your life so pathetic that you find the need to ridicule a harmless statement in order to feel better about yourself? And you need to learn the definition of the term industry.

    • 1 vote
    #2.6 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:24 AM EST
    Reply

    Mind the Gap

    • 5 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 12:03 PM EST

    HAHA. We just returned from London and stayed near the Vauxhall station. My husband constantly said that sentence. Even though they were working on the Circle and some of the District lines AND had a small strike while we were there, the Tube IS amazing. We had stayed in NYC on the way over and the NYC subway is such a dump and sooo dangerous compared to the tube. We either walked or took the tube for all of the 11 days we were in London. If the US could build rapid transit like the Tube, I would be all for it, but it would turn out like NYC or worse. the mentality of the Londoners is so different from ours. They are calm (Keep calm and carry on), where here everyone explodes over the least little thing. We went to New Years on the Thames and happened into an extremely large group of youths who were all drunk. Here it would have been a mob riot, but there, they just had a good time or helped their friends who had passed out (a lot of them).

    • 1 vote
    #3.1 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:07 AM EST
    Reply

    I had fun riding the Tube in 2002 when I stayed in London.

    I am impressed about the simplicity, commonsense and high connectivity that Tube provides to get around most of the attractions of London. Very dependable...

    • 3 votes
    Reply#4 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 12:22 PM EST

    Despite early hazards for passengers such as asphyxiation from smoke and petty crime

    Um... how does one asphyxiate from petty crime?

    • 3 votes
    Reply#5 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 2:12 PM EST

    Muggers in Victorian London strangled their victims with silk scarves.

      #5.1 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 4:18 PM EST
      Reply

      Do the London subway trains have faces and talk?

        Reply#6 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 2:20 PM EST

        No fris, that's Lud, not London!

          #6.1 - Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:06 PM EST
          Reply

          I lived in London for about a year and used the tube maybe three times a week. It is a marvelous engineering achievement and makes living in London possible. If this tradition bound economic basket case can do something like this, why can't we?

          • 1 vote
          Reply#7 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 2:49 PM EST

          My daughters and I travel heavily on the tube when we travel to London. So much easier to use and tidier than the one in NYC. I think it is easy to chart your travel and reasonably priced. But my last few trips have noticed what seems to be an increase in stations closed for work or rail lines closed. Still, great at 150!!

            Reply#9 - Wed Jan 9, 2013 10:25 PM EST

            Always makes me wonder how do you go about starting to build a network like the London Underground ?

            • 1 vote
            Reply#10 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:13 AM EST

            My husband and I spent the holidays in London. It is a remarkable city and the tube is the best avenue of transportation. Happy Birthday!

            • 1 vote
            Reply#11 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:54 AM EST

            Mussolini could get it working promptly...

            • 1 vote
            Reply#12 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:51 AM EST

            The Brits need to hire some efficient Germans to run The Tube. They'll have it up and running at 100%, and have it run on time, in no time at all.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#13 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:37 AM EST

            The Tube is nice but I was surprised at how expensive it is.

              Reply#14 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:59 AM EST

              I enjoyed riding the tube when I was in London......it seemed like an adventure to figure out where I was and when and where to get off the tube. It seemed nice when I was there...no construction, etc.

                Reply#15 - Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:33 PM EST

                Great achievement....ditto for NYC's subway system built in 1904....neither could be built today in the nanny states that are London & NYC....between the graft, bellyaching about environmental issues, diversity, blah....blah...blah....it would be prohibitive in terms of money, time, & settling lawsuits & the never ending list of government mandates. How backwards we've become as a society....so sad....

                • 1 vote
                Reply#16 - Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:42 PM EST

                I can't say about Britain but we have governmental breeding program to lower our national intelligence, welfare. The government pays the stupid women, the number of children that a woman has is inversely proportional to her I.Q., by the number of children she has. I have to say that the breeding program is very successful, we're getting dumber, every generation.

                  #16.1 - Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:16 PM EST
                  Reply
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.