Court orders retrial of former Egypt dictator Mubarak

© Stringer Egypt / Reuters / Reuters

Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak inside a cage in a courtroom in Cairo during his 2012 trial.

Former dictator Hosni Mubarak has won an appeal against his conviction for killing protesters during the Arab Spring uprising and will face a retrial.

A court in Cairo accepted an appeal by the ousted president and his former interior minister, Habib al-Adli, who were sentenced to life in prison last year over the 2011 killings.


"The retrial will be based on the same evidence used in the previous trial. No new evidence will be added to the case," Mohamed Abdel Razek, one of Mubarak's lawyers, told Reuters.

Related: Egyptians warn Morsi is no friend to the United States

The court has also ordered a retrial of al-Adli's aides.

Mubarak, who is 84 and in poor health, was not in court but supporters there cheered the verdict, Al Jazeera reported.

"Wake up, wake up, Egyptians…Egypt has been sold under the name of religion," shouted one man in Arabic, referring to the country’s new ruler, Islamic Brotherhood figurehead Mohammed Morsi.

Mubarak’s sentencing in June 2012 was cheered by crowds, but later in the year there was dismay that his increasing ill-health could allow him to avoid serving his 25-year sentence in prison.

 

Discuss this post

"Wake up, wake up, Egyptians…Egypt has been sold under the name of religion," shouted one man in Arabic, referring to the country’s new ruler, Islamic Brotherhood figurehead Mohammed Morsi.

At least one country has seen the error of their ways...

  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:00 AM EST

If not the whole country, at least some people have seen the light. The problem is that now that the Muslim Brotherhood has control they are not about to relinquish it peacefully. They are now in a position to rig any elections and pass any laws they need to make sure that they stay in power. The only thing that will remove the Muslim Brotherhood from power at this point would be the army turning against them and supporting an overthrow - and I do not see that happening any time soon. Morsi has replaced the army leadership with members of the Muslim Brotherhood who support their rule. This makes the likelihood of the army supporting any popular uprising highly unlikely. It would take a revolt by the rank and file against their leadership for there to be any change in leadership in Egypt at this point. This retrial of Mubarak is not likely to result in a different outcome. Any judges that might be sympathetic to Mubarak are not going to be the ones hearing the case. The only reason for granting the new trial is to remove any question about the previous verdict or that it was reached in the heat of the moment following his ouster from power as a form of revenge. I fully expect him to be convicted again and be essentially sentenced to life in prison again. Any sentence longer than about 15 years might as well be life because it is doubtful he will live longer than that.

  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:43 AM EST
Tara2345aDeleted

The Muslim Brotherhood may hold the elected posts, and may have bullied their constitution into ratification, but there are many secularists in business, science, and especially the military that oppose them.

Mubarak realized the importance of secular power. He loved Egypt and built what he could on the resources he had. One always needs to look at what he built to realize that he was in touch with Egypt's past glory, especially it's pre-Islamic glory. The modern library of Alexandria is one of many fine examples. He spent money, not on charity, but on building programs that employed architects engineers contractors and laborers for pay. It was a difficult task with limited resources. More importantly, Mubarak was in touch with the rest of the world.

Theocracy will destroy Egypt, and turn it into a nation of 7th century warlords. I suppose this is okay if Afghanistan is your role model.

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:18 AM EST

In Egypt, the Sunni extremists with labels like Salaffi and MB (Muslim Bloodhounds) are opening up new chapters of Islamic bigotry. Morsi is just a front for them.

Just watch the fate of sane Muslims, minority sect/tribe people, Christians, women and Israel as the time goes by.

Still we support such seventh extremist barbaric and beastly Sunni haters and killers with our tax monies, indirect support to Syrian rebels and sanctions on Iranian oil.

Followers of Islamic cult, especially House of Saud and other Sunni ME rulers inspired and funded Sunni Islamic radicals and militants (al-Qaida, Salaffi, Wahhabi, MB, Taliban and other label ones), are fast marching backwards to their seventh century desert tribal days.

They are indulging in rapings, lootings, killings and genocides of non-Muslims (Darfur, S. Sudan, Nigeria and spreading like wild fire in many regions and Muslims (Libya, Yemen, Mali, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan and other places).

Even in Syria, if Assad is overthrown by Sunni Islamic religious Nazis like al-Qaida, MB, the conditions of Christians will be unbearable just like Iraq.

Pakis and Sunni rulers of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE and other Sunni Arab League nations are responsible for 80 percent of world problems including economic ones.

Examine the devastations with Iraqi wars and now sanctions on Iranian oil and the resultant oil price manipulations.

They are making the lives of their own people also miserable by their Islamic religious madness to the intolerable levels.

  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:19 AM EST

a elected leader of a country uses army troops to pt down a rebellion , people killed, now he is accused of being a murder; George Washington , whiskey rebellion 1792, several killed, Franklin Roosevelt, veterans bonus rebellion 1934, army used, Richard Nixon ,Kent state, several killed; Paris France 2007 Muslim march, two killed, the list can go on forever, talk about using the law as a weapon against your opponents.

    #1.5 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:22 AM EST

    I wonder if Morsi will be found guilty of the deaths of Egyptians by HIS security forces?

    Unless a political leader directly orders the killing of innocent people for personal gain, then I have a problem with prosecuting them. People who get killed while violently protesting against a government are not 'innocent' and this has occurred in virtually every country - even the United States.

      #1.6 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:08 AM EST
      Reply

      Pure dirty politics here! Nothing else! The man, who ruled Egypt for many years and kept it a relatively free nation, should be allowed to retire in peace! The religious hate and repression that replaced him is NOT based on the rule of law, or freedom and democracy.

      • 8 votes
      Reply#2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:45 AM EST

      I find it funny that fools like you support dictatorship than the people who voted for their government.

      • 2 votes
      #2.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:29 AM EST

      I find it funny that you actually believe the Muslim Brotherhood didn't rig the election. I agree with EK's comment, totally!

      • 4 votes
      #2.2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:18 AM EST

      What are the big words like "rule of law, or freedom and democracy"?

      Do you get them in seventh century barbaric, beastly bigoted Sunni ruled nations like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Kuwait and other Sunni Arab League nations?

      Their hating and killer fronts like Sunni Muslim Bloodhounds and Salaffi know only how to invent enemies and then start hating and killing.

      Mubarak is far better than Sunni Islamic religious Nazis mad beasts for any sane people (Muslims and non-Muslims).

      • 3 votes
      #2.3 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:26 AM EST

      ...and when will NBC News tell us about President Vaclav Klaus's recent granting of amnesty to 30,000 Czech criminals (7,000 prisoners and 23,000 people who still should go to trial)?

      The entire Czech economy was stolen by the Mafia during privatization, and now, as a result of the amnesty, NO PERSON previously convicted of corruption will have anything on their criminal records.

        #2.4 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:53 PM EST
        Reply

        Mubarak, might have been a dictator, but he brought stability to the region.

        • 8 votes
        Reply#3 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:46 AM EST

        I agree, the same with Saddam Hussein. Look at Iraq now. Full of crime and the streets will never be safe again. There are real strongholds of terrorists there now, this was not the case while Hussein was in power.

        • 2 votes
        #3.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:02 AM EST

        Sometimes those close to the 'problem' need to step back and take a look at the whole picture. To some Mubarack seemed like a dictator, but he was protecting the interests of the entire country of Egypt. Under Morsi and the Muslim (radical, intolerant) Brotherhood, there are now terrorists occupying the Sinai, threatening not only Israel, but Egypt itself. Those who wanted Mubarack gone now understand he was keeping them in line with what worked for the whole country and not just the few Muslim radicals.

        • 3 votes
        #3.2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:02 AM EST

        Tea1959: You are absolutely right. Saddam as a leader was ruthless but those people needed a Ruler who would keep a foot on their necks. Look what happens when the foot is taken off. They go crazy with Religion. Look at Syria, Libya, same thing.

          #3.3 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:15 PM EST

          Maybe Americans need a ruler to keep a foot on their butts and stop going crazy over.... nonsence.

            #3.4 - Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:41 AM EST
            Reply

            What is the basis for a "new trial"? It would be nice to know what the Appeals Court reasoning was. More @!$%#ty journalism.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#4 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:13 AM EST

            Who in the H E double hockey sticks, writes these article headlines.

            Mubarak was a small-time dictator compared to the muslim brotherhood.

            These thugs are major dictators, they write their own rules and deny Christians their rights.

            Oh, it was written by NBC, the employer of David Gregory and non-criminal in Washington, DC..............

            • 6 votes
            Reply#5 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:17 AM EST

            chief one they write their own rules and deny christians their rights.

            Nice avatar Native American riding his horse with his gun. Thats cool. That is interesting. Did you know the United States Government would not allow the Native American to practice his own Religion and forced christianity on them. Is their any difference what the American Government did to the Native American by writing their own rules and forcing them not to practice their religion. By the way remember The American Government took their land. American history would have looked a little better if we would have found a better solution than doing what we did. Was the American Government a thug in that action?

            Can you see the similarity in the two?

            • 1 vote
            #5.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:58 AM EST

            They really don't believe in wasting money on a second trial like we do. The writer probably only wrote is based on one interview. Like all the factions seam to believe, 1 trial, 1 sentence, done deal. Giving Murburack life was being kind to an old man.

              #5.2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:25 AM EST

              @Smitty

              The sins of a government nation are usually perpetrated by the government and not the governed. If you think you know a lot about Native Americans, you need to have sat thru a few lessons from my great grandfather and my grandmother. They understood the shortcomings of both sides, and were pleased when actions began to change in 1924. If you see similarities, then note that freedom of religion is a freedom for all citizens, the short coming is that it did not come for the Indians until 1924 Citizenship Act.

              Egypt allowed Christians to openly practice until the Constitution of Egypt was thrown out and the Muslim Brotherhood wrote their own and destroyed the rights of Christians. That's where the thugs are, in the brotherhood. My Great grandfather and grandmother, both accepted Christ and openly and freely practiced their religion. The disavowed the worship of pagan images and turned to Christ.

              When you pick a subject to refer in the blogs, better know your subject and all the answers. I do, as I have studied the past of my forefathers and lived it in my life................

              • 1 vote
              #5.3 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:44 PM EST
              Reply

              "Mubarak, might have been a dictator, but he brought stability to the region."

              So did Sadam Hussein and countless others which the US removed over the years, because they didn't suit them. The people overthrew Mudarak and volted the Brotherhood into power, so they now have to live with what they've got. The US should stay out of it.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#6 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:24 AM EST

              FedupinO, You are so right, Saddam, Kadifi, Mubarak, Now Assad. We should of stayed out of it all. But noooo our Gov thinks it knows whats best for everybody on earth, NOT just us!!

              • 2 votes
              #6.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:00 AM EST
              Reply

              He was one of our "friends",..and now our leader puts us in bed with the Muslem Brotherhood,...TERRORISTS.

              • 6 votes
              Reply#7 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:29 AM EST

              Not only was he our "friend", but until recently he was a "former President"according to MSNBC. Now MSNBC has labeled him a "former dictator".

              p.s. @ IsraelTheApatheid- YOU are the "douche bag"

              • 1 vote
              #7.2 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:42 PM EST
              Reply

              Mubarak stepped down. Instead of making his relenting of power to the will of the people an example for other dictators the courts made him an example in the wrong way and more than likely is exactly why Assad did not and will not relent his power. Mubarak, because he relented power, should have been allowed exile and have let that be the example of the people. The same goes for his cabinet and their staff members.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#8 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:00 AM EST

              Mubarak does not seem too bad now that Egypt has had to see what the USA forced Muslim Bortherhood rule will lead to ! The USA wants these Muslim thugs in power in Syria and the rest of the world it seems ! Shame on them ! This caused Amb. Stevens to be butchered in Libya ! US servicemen will one day be killed as well ! It is time to HANG the traitors in America that has put them in power world wide ! 9-11 may not mean anything to American leaders, but it does to me !

              • 3 votes
              Reply#9 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:08 AM EST

              It wasn't USA, it was our traitor representatives in Washington. Agreed...they should be dealt with.

              • 1 vote
              #9.1 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:03 PM EST
              Reply
              tumeroskDeleted

              I'll bet Mubarak is asking the people of Egypt "Do you miss me yet"? Careful what you wish for.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#13 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:09 PM EST

              The United States has gave over $70,000,000,000.00 to Egypt over the years--The Generals say that is their entitlement--Billion per year$1.5

                Reply#15 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:16 PM EST

                Sad to see the once great and proud county of Egypt slip into the hands of the Islamists. Scratch one more country with any liberties or tolerance of other ideas and religions. There will be genocide of those that don't conform to Sharia law. The tourist business will have to be banned as they can't have those damn infidels polluting their Islamic purity. You know old ladies wearing pants and no head scarfs and the like.

                  Reply#16 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:51 PM EST

                  Compare Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak to President Mohammed Morsi. Ex-President Hosni Mubarak on trial for his life was an ally of the U.S. and secular without the powerful religious bias of Islam in the Muslim world. Morsi caters to the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood anti-Western Islamic dogma of terrorist hatred and revenge.
                  Under the circumstances in Egypt, name a Muslim nation ruler convicted for failing to stop the killings, rather than ordering the crackdown that killed nearly 900 people? The only was Saddam Hussein of Iraq.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#17 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:27 PM EST
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.