North Korea pledges to boost nuclear capability after UN rebuke

North Korea vowed to boost its nuclear capabilities on Wednesday after the United Nations Security Council unanimously passed a resolution condemning its controversial rocket launch last December.

“The present situation clearly proves that (North Korea) should counter the U.S. hostile policy with strength, not with words,” the country’s foreign ministry warned in a statement.

North Korea pledged in the statement to bolster its military capabilities and to build up what it called a “nuclear deterrence." 

It also defended its “independent and legitimate right” to launch satellites and condemned the U.N. resolution as a “wanton violation of the inviolable sovereignty of (North Korea).”

The U.N. resolution passed on Tuesday called on North Korea to abandon its nuclear program and cease rocket launches, and came a month after the country, officially known as Democratic People's Republic of Korea, successfully conducted a rocket launch that put a satellite into orbit.

Pyongyang maintains that the test was purely “for peaceful purposes.”

U.S. officials disagree, saying the test was the latest attempt to develop multistage ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads.

Washington hopes the newest U.N. resolution will help bind world opinion against North Korea’s opaque nuclear program.

"This resolution demonstrates to North Korea that there are unanimous and significant consequences for its flagrant violation of its obligations under previous resolutions," American ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, told reporters after the vote.

China’s unusual support for the resolution, the first in four years to expand sanctions against North Korea, suggests Beijing’s patience with its troublesome neighbor may be fraying. 

But in comments made after the vote, Li Baodong, China's ambassador to the U.N., warned sanctions alone would not resolve the impasse.

“The policy of the sanction does not work,” he said. “The resolution must be accompanied, supplemented by diplomatic efforts.”

The new sanctions were categorized under the scope of existing ones, which were expanded to include North Korean government agencies -- most notably the North Korean Space Agency -- and companies.

In addition, a list of nuclear and ballistic missile technology banned for export to North Korea has been updated.

Despite the resolution and international concerns about North Korea’s nuclear program, leading North Korea expert Wang Junsheng said it was unlikely that Pyongyang would conduct a nuclear test anytime soon.

“(North Korea) uses nuclear tests to negotiate with foreign countries but mainly to establish the Kim family's stature within the country,” he said, referring to the country’s ruling family.

“By successfully launching the satellite last month, there is no need for Kim Jong Un to conduct a nuclear test at this time,” he said. 

Kim Jong Un, North Korea’s supreme leader, is the son of Kim Jong Il and grandson of Kim Il Sung, who founded the communist state.

NBC News' Li Le contributed to this report.

Related:

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un offers olive branch to South in rare address

North Korea missiles could reach US, says South

Video: South Korea finds debris from North's rocket 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

Old Chinese proverb: "He who rattles sword to many times, only has metal filings left"

  • 12 votes
#1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:19 AM EST

Little fat boy is still trying to look like the baddest boy on the block.

He had better watch his back door. As China will not take kindly to his action.

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:01 AM EST

I imagine China is getting tired of covering North Korea's tochis...

  • 3 votes
#1.2 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:18 AM EST

Screw North Korea. The whole place could be bombed back into the stone age in one night.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:59 AM EST

Troy, if you knew anything about them, you'd know that MOST of North Korea IS ALREADY living in the stone age. Its only the people in 'charge' who are 'living' in the 'modern' era (so to speak).

  • 5 votes
#1.4 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:44 AM EST

The article had one very bad assumption:

"Pyongyang maintains that the test was purely “for peaceful purposes. U.S. officials disagree, saying the test was the latest attempt to develop multistage ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads."

If you look at the history of ballistic missiles, particularly ICBM's, you will find that there are very few liquid-fueled or multi-stage rockets. The few that did have had extremely short service lives, usually meaning that they were unsuccessful inb some way. The reasons are 1) liquid fuel propellants tend to be extremely difficult to handle and extremely dangerous, 2) A three stage liquid fueled rocket such as the one NK shot recently has 36 times the risk of failure as a single-staged liquid-fueled rocket of similar design, 3) It takes days to weeks to prepare a three-stage liquid-fueled rocket for launch. During most of this time the missile is in an extremely exposed and vulnerable position for a pre-emptive strike. These are the reasons why no one serious about long-range ballistic missiles ever fooled around with either muiltiple stages or liquid fuels.

While I do not believe that the satellite launch poses any additional threat to the US or anyone else, and I readily admit that there is some small amount of engineering information that NK can derive from such shots, I do believe that they are legitimate space shots and are intended to solidify Kim's hold on power by demonstrating new military technologies and to give their arms sale business a solid advertising cachet.

But what we have to watch is the cooperation between NK and Iran. While there is little religious love lost between North Koreans, presumed athiests, and rabid Islamists like Iran, they have developed a serious arms-length cooperation. North Korea is exchanging nuclear design information and data as well as site hardening experience and design for Iranian solid-fuel and guidance technology. If NK comes into possession of, or develops, a single-stage solid-fuel rocket with intercontinental range, then it will be a serious threat to everyone they can hit with it.

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:07 PM EST

Angela,

Which is why the remainder of it could be bombed into the stone age in one night.....thanks for letting me know that though....I thought they were all living like Americans....who knew...lol.

    #1.6 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:15 PM EST

    Troy, North Korea cannot be bombed into the Stone Age; not in a night, not in a year. They've been preparing for us to try for the last sixty years (remember, technically we're still at war with them and have been since 1950). The last two years of the Korean War were basically WWI-style trench warfare, only with the addition of air power. We had the better air force, so they got very good at digging. They buried everything. Today NK has the most extensive tunnel system known to man. Where are the targets? We don't know. How deep? We don't know. Can we pierce them, even with a specialized bunker-buster? We don't even know that.

    Every time one of these "upstart" nations does something, people say we should just bomb them and be done with it. I wish they realized how difficult wars actually are to win.

    • 2 votes
    #1.7 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:45 PM EST

    I read the headline and laughed outloud. They proclaim the same thing every year until they recieve just compensation to pretend they won't do it again.

      #1.8 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:59 PM EST

      Once Chinese works start making over $1 per hour we could see N.Korea making IPhones next.

      We'd also care more about N. Korea if they had large supplies of oil.

      • 1 vote
      #1.9 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:45 PM EST

      If they had oil, we cerainly would.

        #1.10 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:51 PM EST

        This entire article can be summed up like this - World - NK our weenie is bigger than yours. NK of yeah watch this....

          #1.11 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:37 PM EST

          And they would glow in the dark too.

            #1.12 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:38 PM EST

            yeahbuhwha,

            I hardly think we would subject ourselves to the cold war tactics and trench warfare. I'm pretty sure that the entire military/industrial might of widdle ol' NK could be wiped out in hours...not even the whole night.

            And unless they are incredibly stupid and suicidal, which they might be, they won't be lobbing nukes at the US. The retaliation would be vast and all-encompassing. Anybody in NK to survive will be giving birth to six fingered, three eyed babies with gills and the entire place would glow for a thousand years....or we would just take it.

            NK is like a little impotent man with a big mouth! They can't even feed their people and develop nukes. They have to choose between the two. NK may be a threat...but it is a small one and any damage they could inflict would be very localized. They do not have the capability to bring down any country except their own.

              #1.13 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:51 PM EST

              Hey Troy1101...we tried that once in the Nam...It' really hard to bomb them back to the stone age when they only got one foot out of it.

                #1.14 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:41 PM EST

                The real problem with controlling North Korea, is that they have nothing to loose except the Kim dynasty.

                It is like fight someone who is not afraid to die, what deterent do you have other than killing them.

                An attack by North Korea on South Korea would destroy the South Korean economy, with the exception of a preemptive strike, there is no way to stop them before they reach Seoul.

                Over a 20 year period, I have spent 7 years in South Korea, they are a hard working people, but like our younger generation, their kids don't take North Korea's threat seriously.

                The generation that lived through the Korean War, are dying off, when they are gone who knows what will happen?

                  #1.15 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:26 PM EST

                  China has been busy--busy--busy-------------They now own 33 % of all oil and natural gas rights that lie beneath Colorado and Wyoming--800,000 acres involved--China's CN00C Ltd -----also CN00C Ltd now owns the Canadian energy firm -----NEXON----The Buzzard oil field and assets in the Gulf of Mexico---Chesapeake Energy Corp. sold the property to CN00C Ltd in Colorado & Wyoming--QUESTION---WHO WILL FINNALY OWN AMERICA------MEXICO OR CHINA----Many Americans have lost their jobs--being replaced by cheap Mexican labor.

                    #1.16 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:48 PM EST
                    Reply

                    They are really scared of the mighty UN . lol.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#2 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:48 AM EST

                    Actually, they must be very scared of the UN. Technically, North Korea is at war with the UN (and not actually the US.) It is the fear of the UN that keeps them on the north side of the DMZ and has done so for 60 years. In the event of war, over 60 countries in the UN are already pledged to send troops immediately to fight. Yep, I think the North Koreans might fear the UN. lol

                    • 2 votes
                    #2.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:58 PM EST
                    Reply

                    Their not scared of the UN because they have been doing this crap for years simply because China doesn't have the balls to address the situation. If North Korea implodes they are going to have to deal with millions of refugees.

                    • 6 votes
                    Reply#3 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:59 AM EST

                    What's wrong with them having nukes, we nuked Japan (2) two times.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#4 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:00 AM EST

                    Because you can't have countries with tyrannical governments with the power to drop such devastating weapons upon it's own, or other countries people.

                    You know what, we should get rid of them too!

                    Before anyone says something, yes, I'm being sarcastic.

                      #4.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:45 PM EST

                      Then how come the facist warmongering israel which is worse than NK has nukes.

                        #4.2 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:16 PM EST

                        heinrich - They have nukes because they need to protect themselves against people like you. All your posts, and in every chance you get, your vile remarks always justify why israel need to be strong.

                        • 1 vote
                        #4.3 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:02 PM EST

                        Iran also needs to be strong and have nuclear deterrent against any zionist pre-emptive strike.

                        There are many righteous people like me who are against the ill policy of israel in the theft of Palestinian land and subjugation of Palestinian people. The world will not sit quiety and let israel to continue their occupation and oppression.

                          #4.4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:43 AM EST
                          Reply

                          When will the people of North Korea kick out these crazy leaders they have? What's the problem? Too many guns?

                            Reply#5 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:04 AM EST

                            No money to buy guns or ammo !!!

                            That and the fact that the military has all the guns and fire power. Starving bodies with sticks and stones does not a revolution make.

                            • 9 votes
                            #5.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:28 AM EST

                            @bandjammer,

                            North Korea will never revolt based on a popular revolution. The hold of the elite, with its network of spies, is simply too great. Little children are taught to turn their parents in for making casual remarks that could be construed as "lacking in revolutionary fervor." The only possibility of regime change would come from the military and any change there would likely be much worse than young Kim.

                            • 1 vote
                            #5.2 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:10 PM EST
                            Reply

                            Enough, these little gnats need to be starved to death. No more food for the Pillsbury Dough-Boy. Nothing. And save the humanitarian rant for one of your more progressive followers. If fat boy's loyal flock were worth anything they would have long ago conspired against the regime, no matter what the cost.

                              Reply#6 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:24 AM EST

                              North Korea and Iran are and will continue to test the resolve of the U.N. and the rest of the world. At some point they will have to be dealt with. Is it better to wait until they have more destructive power or take 'em out now? I vote ... NOW!!!

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#7 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:59 AM EST

                              "No," say the same chickenhawks that invaded Iraq for no reason, "let's wait til they get like the Axis powers of the thirties Control of sixty percent of the world." Both North Korea and Iran are one column crack away from collapse, but Russia and China keep holding them up. Provacation towards a decisive war is something we are good at. Let's get it on, as you say, NOW!!!

                                #7.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:43 AM EST

                                The #truth is: The US military does not have sufficient power to "take out" North Korea. Every President since Truman has wrestled with how to deal with NK and no one has yet come up with any serious ideas as how to deal with NK except to sit down and shut up.

                                I was a North Korean intelligence analyst when the NKAF shot down an American EC-121 90nm out from NK over the Sea of Japan. All aboard were killed, including some RIOs that were drinking buddies. I watched as the 5th AF battle staff tried to put together a response and all they could ever come up with was a massive chemical attack. So massive that it eoulf have reguired about 4 times our entire stockpile of nerve gas. Chemical weapons are now outlawed. Because of the hardened targets and the terrain, nuclear weapons would not work very well. If you look at the dmage to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, you can see how much moun tains degrade a nuclear blast. And conventional weapons are pretty close to worthless against the thousands of hardened targets in NK.

                                But the worst thing is that if the event of any attack by US forces against NK, or even a miscalculation by either side, the entire Seoul-Inchon Corridor and the area about 50 miles deep from the DMZ would literally become a "sea of fire." There are thousands of artillery pieces, guided and unguided rockets, heavy mortars and other weaponry in peek and shoot caves and tunnels along the DMZ. All these are located on the back sides of mountains for indirect fire and are pre-surveyed, meaning that they are already sighhted in on specific targets. In about 15 minutes, Soputh Korea would lose its political and financial capital, about 40% of its population, and about 80% of its industry along with its major port. The area along the DMZ would not fare much better --- around 120,000 ROKA troops and 20,000 American troops would become "tripwire" or "sacrificial" casualties. Military planners believe that there would be no combat-effective American main battle units left in South Korea after an attack, leaving the ROKA to carry the load.

                                • 1 vote
                                #7.2 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:27 PM EST
                                Reply

                                Hey TCH, I vote you sign up and be first off the landing craft! It's easy to push for endless war when you have no skin in the game...

                                  Reply#8 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:18 AM EST

                                  Well, I see North Korea wants something again. What is it this time? Trade treaties? Food assistance? More Starbucks? Or how about a new pony for Kim Jong Un? Geesh...

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#9 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:20 AM EST

                                  I want something also. First, I want the Pueblo for starters. That's a non negociable item. It's ours and we want it. Then we want those nukes. Then we want their political prisoners delivered to us, in good shape. Then they can open the border for anyone that wants to leave their miserable country. All this and Kim gets to keep his head. I think we know where he sleeps. No problem dropping a hellfire greeting on him. Seems fair.

                                    #9.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:54 AM EST

                                    @C,Moakler,

                                    Too bad. The North Koreans own the Pueblo and, considering that they took it legally as a prize of war, they are likely to be keeping it. But be of good cheer --- they are taking good care of it and have it on display in Pyongyang as a tourist attraction. As for political prisoners, they are likely to ever be in "good shape" for a long time. The nature of being a political prisoner in North Korea is that you and your family will be worked and starved to death. The only way out ofd those camps is to a grave.

                                    Both South Korea and China are very scared of a regime change in North Korea. Both countries fear a massive flood of refugees if borders were to become leaky. We're talking about billions of dollars a year to feed and guard them. And younger South Koreans are opposed to reunification and that opposition is growing rapidly. South Korea saw what the integration of East Germany into Germany cost (and is continuing to cost.) North Korea is in even worst shape than East Germany was. It is estimated that the average North Korean is 15+ IQ points lower than the average South Korean because of malnutrition. It is likely that reunification would cause South korea to drown in a sea of unskilled, not too bright, sapslingers who would have to be supported by the South Korean worker. It will never happen.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #9.2 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:07 PM EST
                                    Reply

                                    Lying scum found lying again! Is this NEWs?

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#10 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:35 AM EST

                                    Awesome!

                                    They will continue to starve but at least they have nukes. Maybe they can eat nukes?

                                      Reply#11 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:39 AM EST

                                      Eat Nukes !!!

                                      I like that one. If they can. Then that would make them easier to spot, because they would glow in the dark. Or we could detect them using a Geiger-conter.

                                        #11.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:43 AM EST

                                        Maybe you can eat your own excrement you sick selfish uncaring moron ....

                                          #11.2 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:16 AM EST

                                          What a sick, inflammatory and obscene remark by CONRAD who was not insulted by other posters. Typical anti American, radical muslim or communist.

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #11.3 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:23 PM EST
                                          Reply
                                          DianaWarneDeleted

                                          what a bunch of morons posting on here .... ALL of you are repeating the official administration line which is a ZIONIST one without even knowing WHY .....

                                          What did north korea EVER do to the united states ? Their people LOVE amerikans and all you morons do is insult and belittle them with absolutely no knowledge of why ?

                                          I hope they manufacture many more weapons and start selling them to Iran and Syria for that matter. Maybe they can feed themselves and not depend on SANCTIONS being lifted just to eat. Who imposed the sanctions ? We did by strong arming other countries like India and threatening to destabilize it if they sold food to north korea. We threatened india noit to buy Iranian oil but do any of you butt wipes know this at all ?

                                          Go look in the mirror. You morons are behaving like the worst people in the worlkd the israelis. Well, maybe all that will blow back eventually and malls will start exploding. Then you idiots might want to know why ....

                                          If you have to know WE are squezing them

                                            Reply#13 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:15 AM EST

                                            I wonder what Californians will think when the first North Korean nuke hits LA? Will they thank Obama?

                                              Reply#14 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:26 AM EST

                                              North Korea does not have the capability to hit any country further than Japan with a missile. Period. And it is doubtful that they have the capability to hit Japan with a nuke and only the norther half of South Korea would be in range of a nuke. And they have had the same missile capability for around 40 years. The problem for North Korea is that early-stage nuclead devices such as the two that were dropped on Japan are very heavy. Reducing them to a size and weight that a missile could transport would require decades of constant development. Until then, the best NK could do with one would be to hit northern South Korea with a nuke mounted on a SCUD at a very degraded range.

                                                #14.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:33 PM EST
                                                Reply

                                                Is this United Nations going to let this little despot light the world on fire? Just tell the little fag to turn over his weapons or else a full blockaid. If china doesn't like it they can be shut off too. Fighting this little pervert isn't dangerous, not fighting him is dangerous.

                                                  Reply#15 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:32 AM EST

                                                  There has been a full blocade for years. All banned materials are confiscated. But North Korea has been selling arms to other countries (including Syria and Iran) for years. Their anti-ship missiles and SCUD variants are biug sellers. The problem with blocades is that they catch only a small portion of illicit materials. Look at the US efforts to stop sea-borne drugs. Sure , they catch a fes ships and mini-subs, but the vast majority of illegal drugs make it through. Shutting off China would destroy the US economy almost instantly.

                                                    #15.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:12 PM EST
                                                    Reply

                                                    I served in South Korea forty years ago. You know how they make those great little cars? They are really smart people, but the other thing most of you don't know is that they are about the fiercest military ready folks on the planet. We currently hold them back from walking across the 39th and claiming North Korea. Asside from the nukes, which we sould take care of in 1.6 minutes of the begining of hostilities, the South Koreans would be drinking from the Yalu River in about three days, depending on how many North Korean generals refuse to fight. I know if I were a North Korean I would keep a big white hanky with my state supplied rifle. All we need to do is explain to China about debt default if they keep supporting Kim Jung Uggly.

                                                      Reply#16 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:09 PM EST

                                                      @C.Moakler,

                                                      Before you give the ROKA too much credit, remember that South Korean ASW corvette, the Cheonan, that was sunk by a North Korean sub. This is just one example of how risky it is to underestimate your opponent. North Korea has 43 subs. An unknown number of them are advanced Kilo-class diesel electric subs. These have advanced anti-sonar coatings and are capable of lying in the bottom of the Yellow Sea or Sea of Japan for months at a time without coming up from air. Then, when a juicy target, such as a state-of-the-art anti-submarine warfare corvett comes along, they just rise a little and shoot it. With even the best submarine detection electronics available, they never knew what hit them. And the submarine was never even identified, let alone found or engaged. This is just one example.

                                                      BTW --- it's the 38th Parallel.

                                                      North Korean forces are already forward-deployed. This means that its 1.1-million man army is mostly within 100km of the DMZ. This leaves them in an ideal text book position to 1) resist any invasion, 2) conduct an invasion immediately following an intensive bombardment of the Seoul-Inchon Corridor and the DMZ, and 3) counter-attack against any incursion into NK. Their deployment is very similar to that of East Germany during the Cold War.

                                                      It is easy to dismiss the NK army as equipped with obsolete equipment, but an AK-74 is still the equal of any infantry weapon that we use. And an attack against NK would not be a walk in the park by any means and would be more likely to make Vietnam look insignificant by comparison. And calling people names is of no military benefit.

                                                        Reply#17 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:54 PM EST

                                                        Just send in Chris Hemsworth to take care of the North Koreans.

                                                          Reply#18 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:21 PM EST

                                                          OK.. time for some facts:

                                                          1. the DPRK is not going to have a field-ready ICBM for the foreseeable future. They may have been able to jury rig some type of primitive liquid-fuel propulsion system that gives them adequate lift and range but their missiles still don't have modern guidance systems. They also don't have anything roughly resembling a nuclear warhead or other detonator capability. I suppose they might get lucky and hit a desired target in Japan or NE China with a conventional missile.. or even a chemical or bio-weapon payload, but even that's far from certain.

                                                          2. invading the DPRK is not an option. Their standing army and reserves are, together, three times larger than China's total force numbers. Any conceivably-sized invasion force would need to achieve a kill ratio of close to 1:20 or 1:30. No Chinese forces and only some US special forces are that good, with adequate air/drone support, etc. Short of nuking them, there are really very few options to force regime change through military action.

                                                          3. Any scenario that involves attacking the DPRK will probably result in the loss (as in obliteration) of Seoul. Seoul is only 30 miles away form the border, and they don't need state-of-the-art guidance systems to hit it and destroy it with their missiles... plus the millions of troops they would send marching toward it the moment US Naval taskforces or bombers draw close to their shores, plus the prospect of chemical warfare attacks. Any attack on the DPRK will almost certainly result in mega-death for our South Korean allies.

                                                          Like it or not, our actions vis-a-vis North Korea are going to be limited to sanctions and diplomacy - and perhaps starving them out, if we can get the Chinese and Russians to play along - for the foreseeable future.

                                                            Reply#19 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:35 PM EST

                                                            It’s absurd that it gets exposed decades later, one died and the other is 83.

                                                              Reply#20 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:17 PM EST

                                                              Future update.

                                                              The year is 2525. NK today admitted they have continued stockpiling nukes and have now reached a milestone of 99,999 nukes (which they say are defensive only) and tomorrow will mark the 35th anniversary of Jung XLI and a celebration party is planned when the 100,000th nuclear weapon has been confirmed.

                                                              In other news, today it was confirmed that NK's missle test hit targets on the moon.

                                                              Meanwhile, USA, under SALT XVI has reduced theirs to just 50 nukes and plans further reductions and Obama XI claims that the world is safer without them.

                                                              Something wrong with this picture?

                                                                Reply#21 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:47 PM EST

                                                                Something wrong with this picture?

                                                                Yes, you're right, something is. It's utterly ridiculous. If you submitted this premise to a publisher as a teaser to a science fiction novel you'd like to write for them, they'd laugh you out of the room.

                                                                  #21.1 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:15 PM EST
                                                                  Reply

                                                                  Find out when NK plans to test their next nuke. Time the arrival of a nice surprise 200 megaton American nuke to go off simultaneously above ground at their test site. They won't know if they screwed up or if they hit the jackpot, but it will be decades before they figure it all out.

                                                                    Reply#22 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:52 PM EST

                                                                    Whatever N Korea. Thay've been banging war drums for decades while their people starve under their regime. Stay isolated from a world that doesn't care

                                                                      Reply#23 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:46 PM EST

                                                                      ... and I thought their new leader might have a brain, looks like I was wrong.

                                                                        Reply#24 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:12 PM EST

                                                                        Just what the world needs, more nukes.

                                                                          Reply#25 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:15 PM EST

                                                                          is it that time of the year were north korea wants international attention. lol

                                                                            Reply#26 - Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:10 PM EST
                                                                            Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.