London's historic blue plaques under threat from austerity cuts

LONDON – London’s legendary blue plaques -- historical markers commemorating the lives of eminent figures -- face an uncertain future because of austerity cuts at England’s official heritage agency.

More than 850 ceramic signs honor key people who lived in the U.K. capital, and their contribution to human history.

Toby Melville / Reuters (file)

One of London's 869 blue historical markers.

But the program -- almost 150 years old and believed to be the first of its kind in the world -- now faces a “very uncertain future,” according its lead administrator at English Heritage.

“These are extremely difficult times for English Heritage and for the scheme,” wrote Emily Cole in a letter made public earlier this month.

Existing plaques will remain, but no new locations are planned and the panel of historians and experts that considers nominations for future signs has been suspended.

The news has been greeted with dismay in London.

“Blue plaques are one of the most charming ways a capital has ever found to preserve historical memory,” cultural commentator Jonathan Jones wrote in The Guardian newspaper. “They eschew the pomposity of statues.”

David Tucker, who leads thousands of tourists on guided walks of London every year, told NBC News: “The plaques are part of the fabric of the city and it’s such a shame.

“As an American living here for 30 years, I can say that I still find myself coming across plaques I have never seen before and learning new things.”

The earliest surviving plaque, erected in 1867, marks the building in King Street where French emperor Napoloeon III once lived. (The first, erected the same year to commemorate the birthplace of Lord Byron, was lost when that building was demolished in 1889.)

In total, the city is dotted with 869 circular, domed signs. Among those honored are Americans with London connections including Jimi Hendrix -- who lived on Brook Street while recording 'Electric Ladyland' -- author Mark Twain, inventor Samuel Morse and broadcast journalist Edward Murrow.

Similar historical markers now exist elsewhere in England in many other cities around the world, including in the United States through bodies such as the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission.

“Over the next eighteen months, we will work up the details of a new and more cost-effective approach to its administration,” said Ellen Harrison, a spokeswoman for the English Heritage, adding that it would need to “become more cost effective and more self-sustaining.”

Each sign costs $1,500 to manufacture and a further, variable, sum to install, while the overall program costs $400,000 a year to operate.

English Heritage last year generated around $86 million from membership subscriptions and admission fees at its historic sites. But it is still heavily reliant on public cash, and faces a 34 percent cut in its grant from Department for Culture, Media and Sport, from $218 million in 2010 to $147 million in 2014, as the U.K. government struggles to reduce a huge budget deficit.

One plaque marks the site of the studio used by sculptor Sir William Reid Dick, who wrote that buildings are “more than just bricks and mortar…they are the theaters in which our lives are enacted.”

More international stories from NBC:

'We were so terrified': Jihadists leave trail of destruction, brutality in Mali town

'Getting worse': Egypt's gays fear government crackdown

'Natural born killer': Campaign demands eradication of cats from New Zealand

Discuss this post

Money for endless wars and welfare for the very rich, but no money for the people .

    Reply#1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:00 AM EST

    Those wars you speak of...those animals we are after would rather kill you than look at you. They hate you for being western. You ever heard of the old saying kill or be killed? By the way, when is the last time you lived in London and paid their tax rates or the price of a simple meal? It's excessive and this is because of their huge social system which is in place "for the people". On a final note braniac, America ran from this society many years ago. This is why there are so many people against creating a social system with more people taking than putting in. Margaret Thatcher - "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. "

      #1.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:20 AM EST

      Austerity is the word of the day. Gotta keep your bankers happy, but you can't tax them.

        #1.2 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:33 PM EST
        Reply
        DianaWarneDeleted

        Don't really understand why it costs $1,500 to make one of those plaques and suggest it could be done much cheaper (brings back memories of the US Navy paying $20K for a screwdriver!). Nor is it very apparent why it costs $400k a year to operate a program that has no dynamic business demands i.e. once the plaques are installed where is the operating cost going forward?

        Sounds to me like someone has been scamming the system is the reason the program is being cancelled.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#3 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:29 AM EST

        I can understand the $1500 for the plaques since they are ceramic and are individually made due to the different inscription on each one. As for the $400,000, I imagine it goes to support the processing and review of the nominations of new locations as well as "the panel of historians and experts that considers nominations for future signs." It is a typical government bureaucracy. They have to have a place for the panel to meet and support staff to process the paperwork. They also probably have one or two researchers on the payroll to look into the historical claims made in nominations.

        • 1 vote
        #3.1 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:44 AM EST
        Reply

        Lets do the math here, they've got $304,000,000 (that's millions) and a $400,000 annual budget, and they can't make ends meet without more public money? They could run this program for another 760 YEARS and have enough! This is not adding up...

        • 1 vote
        Reply#4 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:38 AM EST

        LOL, I was thinking the same thing! The figures are just not adding up. The discrepancy needs to be explained, or the reader is left to believe there is a big scam going on.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#5 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:53 AM EST

        Maybe a little less cash should've been handed to Danny Boyle for his silly Olympic ceremonies, and diverted to the blue plaques, instead (come to think of it, a little less Olympics, with their now-derelict facilities might have been in order. And why couldn't William and Kate have simply eloped and saved the Privy Purse and British taxpayers who knows how many pounds that could've been applied to any number of useful endeavors).

        Lastly, why can't the Queen and her family go out and get some real jobs, instead of living on the public dole?

          Reply#6 - Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:40 PM EST

          Many Americans feel the same way about our elaborate inaugurations and State dinners we waste so much money on.

          Why spend all that money having those dinners for people who hate us... all pomp and ceremony when a good cookout with hot dogs and hamburgers would serve just as well. And yes, they could serve Hebrew National for the Muslims who don't eat pork.

          Good grief! Think of all the money saved that could be used for more constructive purposes.

            #6.1 - Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:12 PM EST
            Reply
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.