Khomeni can take pig meat/pork but not beer!

When he comes to the US, he needs a camel to drive.

Allah has prohibited beer for Khomenis'

Ahmadinejad is a liar and has repeatedly stated Israel and the United States should be incinerated. He is using delay tactics while his nuke teams are working 24/7. Time to turn some sand into glass before it is too late.........

Hardcoffeeat6am

I'm sure with your vast foreign policy experience, you could tell us exactly how President Obama should deal with Iran. Maybe we should go to war with Iran? How much should we borrow from China, like Bush did with Iraq? How many Americans should die? What are you willing to pay for this one? I am all ears.

Iran says willing to talk about nukes but 'enemies' must stop 'pointing the gun'

That's like the NRA saying they are willing to talk about gun control, provided they do not have to take any responsibility and can continue their lobbyist funding of Republicans in Congress.

After all these years we're still fighting Middle East battles, last place we were bombed out of Benghazi..

Can't we take a hint..Let Israel deal with them.

Its funny, or not, but we call this guy a liar, can someone please explain to me why American Politicians are any better? The USA is full of Political Liars yet we stand on our soapbox when it comes to Nations we perceive as immoral or not living the right way. I get Iran is dangerous, I get they are a de-facto Theocracy but what exactly are we doing that is so right? We are occupying other countries, we allow our Corporate Cronies to do business with Countries that we know oppress their citizens. Its just more selective moral ism.

Furthermore we have 35 percent of our Citizens who live off the Government, the IRS can raid my bank account with little more then a letter notifying me of such action.

I for one am tired of this crap, sit down with guy in good faith and see if you can get a deal done. Another war is not the answer, that is unless you're Wall Street. They want the spending, Wars make money, Oil Companies want these wars because it drives up oil prices..

BTW we have enough Nukes to completely destroy the planet..

BS BS BS BS BS

"We are occupying other countries. We allow our corporate cronies to do business with countries that we know oppress their citizens." That's the way the USA does business, and all under the guise of righteousness. It's no wonder other countries see us as the global threat, trying to strategically take over the world decade by decade, generation by generation. Do we allow other countries to set up base on American soil? How would we react to that? It would be a little unsettling to say the least.

And just what kind of conversation would we have with Iran? I think we've already had it. It went like this. US: "We need to talk to you about the nuclear weapons that you are developing." Iran: "We are not developing nuclear weapons." US: "You have to stop developing them and let us in there to keep an eye on your nuclear program." Iran: "We are not developing nuclear weapons, so there is nothing for you to observe." End of discussion.

ItsAboutTime-3704531

That's like the NRA saying they are willing to talk about gun control, provided they do not have to take any responsibility and can continue their lobbyist funding of Republicans in Congress.

it was a nice try but nobody fell for your biased agenda bait... next time, bub

Ahmadinejad is using the same reasoning that the Israelis use. The Palestinians want to destroy Israel (they point the gun at Israel), so the Israelis refuse to negotiate with them. When and if Hamas and Fatah unite, the question of whether the Palestinians will ever recognize Israel will determine peace or possibly armageddon. I agree with Witchrunner. Discussions will be useless. The Iranian leadership is a council of devils. I can't wait for the oil to run out....especially in Iran.

Pray tell, Jayfos, what analogy would you use? Not trying to incite anything, just really curious as it seemed a decent analogy to me.

That analogy would imply that the NRA insists guns don't exist?

In a speech to mark the 34th anniversary of the Islamic revolution, Ahmadinejad struck a more conciliatory tone than Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who on February 7 rebuffed a U.S. call for direct negotiations on disputes between the two countries.

Ahmadinejad does not have the authority to authorize negotiations over the nuclear program, which lies with Khamenei.

"You cannot point a gun at the Iranian nation and then expect them to have negotiations with you," Ahmadinejad said, speaking to a crowd gathered in Tehran's Azadi (Freedom) Square.

And you cannot point nuclear weapons at Israel and expect them to not react! He doesn’t want to talk……he wants TIME to perfect his nuclear weapons!

Why exactly is President Obama really going to Israel on March 20 and 21?

Obama coming to Israel March 20-21 to pressure Israel not to strike Iran, reports Israeli media

No peace initiative on Obama Israel trip

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/no-peace-initiative-obama-israel-trip-205521651.html

With the visits likely to focus heavily on Iran's nuclear challenge and the civil war threatening to tear Syria apart, White House spokesman Jay Carney played down speculation that new peace initiatives could also feature.

the two leaders have also been at odds over the imminence of the threat from Iran's nuclear program

“The main purpose of US President Barack Obama’s visit to Israel in the spring, is to warn Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu against attacking Iran,”

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=302768

According to the officials, the urgency of the trip is because in his speech to the United Nations in September, Netanyahu had flagged the spring of 2013 as a significant time in the context of the Iranian nuclear threat.

Therefore, they said, Obama is concerned that the prime minister will decide to attack Iran now when he is backed by a new government and can establish a new security cabinet, without Dan Meridor and Benny Begin, two Likud MKs and alleged opponents of such a strike who lost their Knesset seats in the recent elections.

The officials told Army Radio that the US president subsequently decided to transmit a direct message to Netanyahu: "Don't attack Iran, let me handle matters with the Iranians according to my understanding, and if necessary I will take action, we have capabilities that you do not."

‘Obama is coming to tell Netanyahu not to strike Iran’

http://www.timesofisrael.com/obama-is-coming-to-tell-netanyahu-not-to-strike-iran/

Ah, the nobel peace prize winner cometh to tell Bibi what to do! Meanwhile, Obama is arming the muslims with more firepower! Bibi, don’t trust the man who speaks with FORK TONGUE!!!

Unfortunately, I think Israel will have to go it alone. Barry has no intention, nor the clout to stop Iran! Hes just full of hot air! Israel is the “little satan” WE are the Great Satan! They won't listen to us…….we are next on the hit list!

This pig puppet Iranian prez terrorist is only the spokesman for the equally terrorist ayatollahs and their Islamic Terrorist Revolution in 1979 that has since held the world hostage ,Strong word I know,but I personally saw the results of their 2 massacres and terrorists attacks in Buenas Aires in the 1990's when they blew up 2 buildings.And this is only the tip of the iceburg.They´ve carried out atacks on 6 continents. They lie to the "infidels" and other Muslim countries. They´ve even admmited they now have a nuclear capacity.If the U.S doesn´t set a deadline to attack,than Israel should do it.This is like 193-38 in Nazi Germany .The stakes are too high to give these pathological criminal mass murderers more than 5 minutes.They are brainwashed zombies,and waving their book and mass murdering in the name of a psychotic type of Islam.There is noting more to say to them, open ALL nuclear sites without any conditions and as long as needed to the U.N inspectors.who can arrive without warning and stay as long as necessary.Any monkey business and it won´t be just their prez who is sent to outer space,The whole Islamic Revolution the Rev guard thebrainwashed Hitler type ayatollahs will join the monkies and disappear from the planet and their regime and Revolution will be over--5 minutes and counting....

Jayfos

it was a nice try but nobody fell for your biased agenda bait... next time, bub

What can I say... When 20 children are murdered by a responsible 'gun owner' assault weapons, I have an agenda. Biased? Nah... The NRA creates a myth that the entire second amendment is going to be taken away. Those lemmings who believe it, then go out and buy as many rounds and guns as they can. The gun manufacturers make a ton of money, the NRA gets increased membership, and more republicans get big fat checks from lobbyists. It's not biased, that's reality.

The headline certainly presents false hope...

Iran says willing to talk about nukes but 'enemies' must stop 'pointing the gun'

There is no mention of Israel and this is what I had hoped for the most - Iran willing to talk peace with Israel. ...sigh... too much to hope for...

GM Fed and bart...excellent posts.

GM Chef!! Keep dreaming, there is no hope! You are dealing with extreme islamic terrorists hell bent on the return of the 12th Imam!

chef & Fedup: I'm staying out of this one. Just wanted to wish you both a belated happy and healthy new year.

Thanks, Basil. Right back attcha!!! ☺

chicken! Happy and Healthy New Year to you too!!

Obama's weak, he'll cave in and relax some sanctions to get the Iranians to the negotiation table, which is exactly what the Iranians want since it will buy them the time necessary to complete their nuclear agenda.

The Iranians are single mindedly focused on possessing nuclear weapons because they feel that's what they need to be taken seriously. Consequently, nothing will prevent them from acquiring nuclear weapons but a series of military strikes.

"Today the enemies are trying their utmost to put pressure on the Iranian nation to stop its progress but they will not succeed," he said.

So why bother trying to stop them with negotiations. The US is the enemy and they will not listen.

There are only two ways they can be stopped.

Either the people (Green party with Western help) revolts and throws the whacko clerics out.

Or Israel engages in a surgical attack on their nukes. This may take some doing as they are well protected. The Israelis are resourceful, but maybe not enough. And the Israelis could start the job, but it would take Western intervention to finish it. And the less collateral damage the Israelis cause, the better the outcome.

But either scenario is a long shot. The only thing less likely is that this Administration succeeds in stopping the Iranians nuclear ambitions. This Administration has failed at just about every other Middle East strategy, Iran is the toughest of them all. The Administration's only chance at success lies in Kerry. I am not a Kerry fan, but if he takes the right stance, and creates a bi partisan team at the House and Senate level, he could do it.

Iran needs to be melted

Ahmanutjob's speech and comments mean absolutely nothing, as he has no real power to make or enforce policy. He is only the figurehead/puppet for the regime. The real power behind the throne has already spoken. Khameni wants neither peace nor discussion. Nothing will change until he dies or is overthrown by the Iranian people themselves! Either way, I doubt any change is going to happen in Iran without a lot of innocent people paying a huge price in blood. Khameni and his lunatic clerics will not yeild power without that.

Hey Ed - Why exactly should anyone in Iran have to pay a huge price in blood?

Iran hasn't attacked anyone. They are happy with the Persian Empire, which was formed thousands of years ago. Iran has the natural resources and would be doing quite well if not for sanctions brought about because of pressure from Jews.

The world should collectively say, f you Israel, we will trade with whom we please. Americans would be far better off without the sanctions meant to cripple Iran and inflict hardship on her millions of citizens. The price of oil would drop and we would have access to Iranian markets, which would enhance our trade balance. Instead, we base our decisions on the wants of Jews in Israel and the US and end up losing a chance at better lives for our citizens.

To top it off, we just keep sending the Jews in Israel our tax dollars, so they can enjoy what we might have.

ItsAboutTime-3704531

Hardcoffeeat6am

I'm sure with your vast foreign policy experience, you could tell us exactly how President Obama should deal with Iran. Maybe we should go to war with Iran?

He's just another internet foreign policy expert who has gained his vast experience in this field by reading the news and watching a few Youtube videos.

It's been proved with 100% certainty by multiple countries that Iran is working on a nuclear weapons program and not for their claimed peaceful use of nuclear energy production. How naive do you need to be to believe that the country with the 4th largest oil reserves and the 2nd largest natural gas reserves needs nuclear power plants to produce electricity?

Lusitania

After all these years we're still fighting Middle East battles, last place we were bombed out of Benghazi..

Can't we take a hint..Let Israel deal with them.

You willing to sit back and watch a nuclear war break out in the Middle East? Because that's exactly what will happen if we just kick back and let Israel do it's own thing. They are not going to sit there and allow a country that has repeated called for the destruction of Israel to build nukes. The moment they feel they are on their own, they will act and a war will begin. And it will escalate to much more than just Israel vs Iran and when it reaches a point when Israel feels it's in a losing situation, they will use their nukes and millions of people will die. Like it or not, Israel is an ally and we do have treaty obligations. Do we just ignore those?

Btw, the Benghazi comment was just plain idiotic.

Ralph

Please try to make an effort to stay on topic here. We are not talking about Israel here. This is about Iran. We all know full well how much you hate Israel and Jews and always have to find some reason to throw them into any discussion.

My statement above speaks for itself. Any effort by the Iranian people themselves to get rid of the religious leadership will make what is happening in Syria look like child's play, as Khameni and company will try to take as many people as possible down with them. That is the way with religious fanatics. And save the tired old speech about " Iran hasn't attacked anyone." Iran's hands are no more lily white her than ours are. They war by proxy, just as we and other nations do and have done in the past. They have or are supplying arms to the Taliban in Pakistan, Al-Qaida in Iraq, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza.

Either way, as I have already stated, the Iranian government is not worth the price of American blood or ordinance. Let the Iranian people and her neighbors deal with Ahmadinejad, Khameni, and their ilk on their own. When the Iranian people are ready, change will come then and only then. Have a good evening.

Ed Navy Doc

While an uprising in Iran by the liberal Green Party, the likes of the facebook generation in Egypt would be bloody, the people of Iran need to do something before their country either goes bust or gets obliterated. Yes, the country has used surrogate terrorist groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, and may not have attacked anyone DIRECTLY, but indirectly remains the one true nation that supports terrorism. For that the whacko clerics should be forcibly removed, the best method being by the Iranian people. I think the US has to support the liberals in Iran, at the risk of another "forcible planting of the Shah" incident. Otherwise, if the liberals did remove the clerics, they just might end up with the Muslim Brotherhood. You might say the Brotherhood is Sunni while Iran is predominately Shi'ite, but the Brotherhood and Iran share a common client, Hamas. So there is some relationship.

As to Ralph, he doesn't know the difference between a Jew and a Zionist. I don't think he knows how many Jews are also Iranians living in Iran, or that a large percentage of Iranians have a positive relationship with Jews. It's the clerics that hate Israel.

Lar

Agree with you 100% on all counts!

"In a speech to mark the 34th anniversary of the Islamic revolution, Ahmadinejad struck a more conciliatory tone than Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who on February 7 rebuffed a U.S. call for direct negotiations on disputes between the two countries."

Iran is an example of tenth century desert mindset Islamic mad nuts unlimited!

What a bunch of cowards?

These brave fighters against girls, women, minority and unarmed could not put down Sunni Syrian rebellion against their pal, Assad.

It is better that on their next holy days: they should chain themseles; and slash themselves to death or better hang themselves near their Shiite mosques!

I'm happy that he is aware that guns are pointing at him - at least he won't be surprised when the triggers are pulled... although he'll still Shiite his pants.

I agree with that.

Our enemy No. 1 are seventh century desert mindset Sunni Islamic extremism invented, funded and exported by oil rich Sunni rulers and Pakistan.

To weaken enemy No. 1 and crash oil prices, it is better to remove sanctions on Iranian oil.

Crashing oil prices will help improve our, British and many oil importing European nations' economies.

We can talk, talk and talk with these Shiite tenth century desert mindset, Iranian rulers and expect not much from the talks.

I'm sure the US is open to direct talks. However, the Iranians want the sanctions lifted, first. Stupid. Who would give up their bargaining chips in ADVANCE?

The US offered direct talks. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei last week said no.

Direct talks are not worth much if Khameni tries to bite our hand or spit in it every time we even try. Keep up the sanctions, isolate them, and let them rot. Their government is not worth American lives or ordinance! We can only hope the Iranian people will eventually tire of the lunatics leading them and rise up.

Jonathan, if you changed Sunni Saudi Arabia to Israel you would be right.

So, Parker, you've developed a new delusion that Israel is Islamic. Impressive.

Pakis sold stolen nuclear technologies to Iran, N. Korea and Libya's Gadhaffi.

Iranians can get/buy/steal nukes from Pakis.

No we won't talk...yes we'll talk, but you have to.....F them. They talk too much already and do what they want in the end. A good smash in the teeth would help remind them of that. Bunch of stone age monkeys.

why is it the usa dictates who has or hasnt the right to have nuclear arms when we are the only nation to ever use them?

because we rule the world. There is too much money at stake and too many people who need to be fed for us not to. If you don't like it, tough.

Because we used it to stop sh&t, not to start sh&t during WW2.

Because only democracies are strong and wise enough to control their nuclear arsenal. Extremists and fanatics are fairly devoid of self control.

Because only democracies are strong and wise enough to control their nuclear arsenal. Extremists and fanatics are fairly devoid of self control.

In other words we should decide who's wise enough to have them? What about North Korea or even Pakistan? We only attempt to impose our will when the target is too weak or they don't have powerful enough allies. Since neither Russia or China is a democracy maybe we should take their nukes.

With most nations MAD works in principal pretty well. Since USSR, and China have them we need them to counter ballance thier threat. The same goes for India, and Pakastan. Iran North Korea, and a few others don't mind getting blown up if Their God deems it good so that they can have thiere virgins, (with no body what good will it do anyway). The best bet is to prevent them if possible.

Reality, what so many people fail to comprehend is that the issue it is not so much whether said counties have them or not. It is what unstable fundamentalist Islamic regimes like Iran would do with them if they did have them! Iran's immediate neighbors are scared silly at the thought that Iran has or will get the bomb soon.

Ed-NavDoc, Iran is an unstable regime? They have not started a war in over 200 years. How many wars have we been in in the last 100 years? Tell me one country Iran has attacked. Israel has attacked every coutry around it. They are an unstable theocracy that has nuclear weapons. The uranium was stolen from the United States. Quit all the hasbara about Iran.

Parkerjoe

Yes, Iran is an unstable theocratic regime! And you have used that same tired old remark about "Tell me one country has Iran attacked?" before. You know as well as I do that Iran does what a lot of other counties do or have done in the past, including us. They war by proxy! Iran supplies arms to the Talibani insurgents in Iraq. They supply weapons to Hezbolla in Lebanon, and Palestinians in Gaza. Sorry to let you down, but we are not talking about Israel here so you are off topic. Your hatred of Israel is quite well known on the Vine so save your bigotry and anti-Israel bias for someone who cares and give it a rest! A shame your hatred of Israel will not let you see past the end of your nose.

Ed how come your so pro-Israel? Are you not a US citizen? Israel has been threatening Iran for over 20 years now so it is on subject. Hezbollah was started in 1982 when Israel invaded Lebanon and killed thousands of Palestinian refugees, mostly women and children. Hezbollah swore they would never allow that to happen again. Hamas was started by the Israeli Mossad to go against Arafat and the PLO. Try reading a little Ed, knowledge goes a long ways. It actually saves lives.

ParkerJoe

When Hamas was created by THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, Israel assessed it as a better choice than Fatah, which was lead by Arafat and had a past of terrorist activity. Eventually, Hamas could not hold back its terrorist activity and realized that winning the street of Palestine meant being terrorist. Israel then withdrew it's support.

The Middle East changes, and good intelligence is the only way to stay ahead of the game. Remember, Iran and Israel shared some of the best relationships in the past.

Stop reading just Islamist, Arab publications. A good read is Hamas vs Fatah. I lent it to someone so I can't find it on my bookshelf, forgot who wrote it.

I would say a US Citizen, such as me, should be supportive of our best ally in the Middle East, Israel. What nationality are you?

add to 12.10

Today Fatah has evolved into a more reasonable organization, witness the growth of Ramallah vs Gaza City, which is run by Hamas. So Israel is more comfortable dealing with Fatah. While the disputes over land in the West Bank is still ongoing, it is only slivers of land compared to the expansive land that Israel gave back to Egypt Sinai, and Gaza to the Palestinians.

Sorry to have gone off track on this story about IRAN, but I was just trying to educate ParkerJoe.

Parkerjoe

I am neither pro Israel nor pro Iran. I am pro America! I am in fact a U.S. citizen, are you? I am willing to bet I am far better versed in history than you are and do far more reading than you do. I also happen to have a undergraduate degree in World History so I will be happy to debate anything you can come up with. You are right about knowledge. When you acquire some, please let me know and then we can talk like adults. I have nothing further to say to you.

Lar

Thank you for your well reasoned and well stated comments. When people's insights and comments are clouded by their hatred like those above, it is difficult or next to impossible to reason with or to educate them to reality. I commend your efforts. You have more patience than I do.

save-Because only democracies are strong and wise enough to control their nuclear arsenal.

Really? While I hate the idea of nuclear weapons in general.You might want to remember that Russia (USSR),and China have had nuclear weapons for a very long time. And yet the only country ever to use nuclear weapons was our own democratic country.

Uncle Bob,

As someone who actually lived in USSR I am telling you, you don't want Russia to be the top dog in this world. US, for all it's flaws, is much better.

UncleBob:

1) The US was provoked into war by a cowardly sneak attack by the Japanese.

2) The Chinese and Russians have killed far more of their own people in political purges than the US has with 2 small nukes.

3) The US probably saved more Japanese lives than they killed (many hundreds of thousands MORE Japanese died from conventional bombing than from nukes)

4) The US saved the lives of countless US soldiers & marines. In the Battle of Okinawa (area of about 800+ square miles, about 12,500 US military dead, about 100,000 Japanese military and another roughly 100,000 Japanese civilians, and it took 82 days. Kyushu the 3rd largest Japanese island is 13,760 square miles and Honshu (the largest) is 88,000 square miles. Picture Okinawa times a hundred.

5) Had the Axis powers developed nukes first, I'm sure we all know what would have happened.

@ Eli100 and paganponderer, I'm not arguing the rightness or wrongness of having one country or the other with nuclear weapons. Remember,I said I don't like nuclear weapons at all. I'm just stating undeniable facts. The USSR for all its faults,had and didn't use its nuclear weapons against anyone. And the only country in history that did use them against another country,was us,the democratic state.For whatever reasons we had,we still used them and the dictatorship's haven't. My point is that no one is holier than thou over the nuclear issue.

Doesn't mean we shouldn't STOP Iran from getting nukes, just like just because Native Americans were genocided didn't mean we shouldn't have fought the Nazis.

The only reason the dictators haven't is because it might have resulted in a retaliatory strike against USSR or China. And who would China have used them against? OR Russia?

Called Mutually Assured Destruction.

paganponderer-The only reason the dictators haven't is because it might have resulted in a retaliatory strike against USSR or China.

That's true of all countries. The Russians wanted them so we wouldn't use them against them.Before the Chinese got them we used to threaten to use them if we went to war.After they got them we've both been getting a long. Like you said the MAD deterrent worked.

And some countries want nukes so they can act badly (i.e. support terrorist groups, etc) without fear of a conventional attack.

Should any country that wants nukes get them? How about the Taliban when they ruled Afghanistan?

paga... the japanese took the bait that u.s threw at them u.s actually initiated the conflict by a 100% oil embargo on japan. just remeber when the arabs put a 10% oil embargo on u.s how people had to wait hrs to get gas, now imagine a 100% oil embargo on japan. the japanese had no choice but to go for the kill or die.

save the environment - Those facts you just stated are only facts in your own uninformed mind. With any research at all, you will find there is no evidence Iran wants a nuclear device. They support "freedom fighters", not terrorists.

Ralph, either you're Iranian supporting their views or you need to put the crack pipe down.

The weapons used against our soldiers in the middle east are being supplied via Iran. Ralph, this, and them running around the streets burning American flags and chanting death to USA is why they are under the microscope. If they are able to supply explosives without being directly involved in the war, which I think they are, then this is very scary. Unfortunatly most people believe the best we can do is delay what will eventually happen. It's really a shame cause most people in Iran don't want this anymore than I do, they just live a day to day life and want a safe home for their family. If only the governments would get along like we the people do. If you have ever traveled to other countries you would know what I am talking about.

MinerFortyNiner, Iran does not make AK-47's used in the middle east. Read a little more before you make false statements.

No, they don't make them, they just buy and resell them.

34 inches in CT - never lost power though

Hey Von-Dorf are you mad the Germans did get all the Jews back in the 40`s .

Henrich! You again? You're everywhere against the United States?!

Pro-Chinese, pro-Iran. Tell me how pro-North Korea and pro-Chavez are you? In you mind, does America walks around with a red scaly skin, a bifurcated tail and a pitch fork in the right hand?

Stop sending your money to Al-qaeda, they're going down.

I hope the FBI keeps an eye on you.

why don't you channel your concern on enviromental issues as your name suggests instead of attacking anyone whose views are different to your delusion.

US is wrong politically in her handling on issues relating to China, Iran, N Korea, Cuba, Venezuea and nations that do not toe her line. US is no angel and only work for her own interests. Her blindly support of the zionist rogue state to the detriment of Palestinians causes the resentment of the righteous people across the world.

US's containment of Russia by placing the missile defense shield at Russian door step is also wrong. So that makes me pro-Russia too.

All right Henrich, have it your way.

But if you dislike the United States and you live here I suggest you move out because I don't see how you possibly could be happy staying in this country you perceive as this bad. Good luck to you.

That is a very uneducated suggestion.

Living in one country does not mean you have to agree with everything the government does. There are many people in US share my view on US unlawful involvement in Iraq and Vietnam. Ask yourself are they all anti-america?

Silly Henrich,

I'm plenty educated, yet a suggestion doesn't have to be educated.

Caps lock is CRUSE CONTROLL for COOL.