Benjamin Netanyahu's Israeli coalition may not be to his liking

Ronen Zvulun / Reuters, file

Yair Lapid, right, stands behind Israeli President Shimon Peres, who is seated next to Benjamin Netanyahu, at a reception in Jerusalem on Feb. 5. Lapid, a relative newcomer, has been able to gain numerous concessions from the veteran Netanyahu as the latter struggled to form a coalition government.

News analysis

TEL AVIV -- It is no surprise that Benjamin Netanyahu will be Israel's prime minister for the third time. The makeup of his Cabinet, however, may be jarring, especially to him.

Two days before the deadline imposed by election rules, he overcame the final obstacles and reached a compromise with Yair Lapid, the political novice who heads the second-largest party in the Israeli Knesset.

The agreement, which is expected to be signed Thursday, gives his coalition 68 seats out of 120 in the new parliament, which should be sworn in next week.

Lapid may be a novice, but analysts here say he achieved major victories over the prime minister. He demanded that there be a maximum of 20 Cabinet ministers instead of the bloated 30.

Struggling to find seats for his party members, Netanyahu fought tooth and nail against Lapid and lost. There are now likely to be 22, including Netanyahu.

Netanyahu was determined to keep the education portfolio for his own party. Lapid insisted on having it and appears to have won.

It didn't all go Lapid's way, but the message to the voters is clear: Lapid is the man to watch. Indeed, the former television host has already let it be known that he wants to be Israel's next prime minister.

If Lapid, and for other reasons Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Lieberman, were the winners in the Jan. 22 elections, the losers, to a large extent, were the ultra-orthodox religious parties. The Haredim, as they are known here, who form 10 percent of Israel's population and are by far the fastest-growing group, have no seat at the Cabinet table.

That means the government has the opportunity to cut the funds devoted to ultra-orthodox institutions such as their study yeshivas and schools, which in the 2012 education budget totaled close to $1 billion.

Large state subsidies go to their traditionally large families and fund the men who study the Torah full time. These are some of the issues that upset Lapid and his voters, and that now, as Israel's minister of finance, he would have an opportunity to change. That's why control of the education ministry was so important to him: Most yeshiva funding goes through that ministry.

Bad blood
This is not what Netanyahu wanted. He wanted his usual rightist/ultra-orthodox coalition. Instead, through failed brinksmanship he ended up with exactly the opposite: a coalition of his rightist party, Likud-Beitenu, with the left and center, as well as with his natural partner, another new young politician, Naftali Bennett, who leads a rightist party that coordinated every move with Yair Lapid.

Blame the wife. That's what the analysts here say. Bennett, who was once Netanyau's chief of staff, had a major falling out with Sara Netanyahu, ending in bad blood between him and the prime minister.

The natural coalition after the January elections was between the two rightist parties, Netanyahu's 31 seats and Bennett's 12 seats, which would have guaranteed them power if allied with the ultra-orthodox parties. Experts say Netanyahu should have drafted Bennett to the cause immediately.

Instead Netanyahu miscalculated and, reportedly because of personal animus, tried to form the basis of a government without him.

That drove Bennett into the arms of Lapid, where he stayed. The two new young leaders displayed a virtue rare in politics: loyalty to an ideological opponent, based on the power of their word.

Result: Netanyahu has what he most wants, the position of prime minister. But he has the Cabinet that he least wants. A rocky term awaits him.

NBC News' Martin Fletcher is the author of "The List,""Breaking News" and "Walking Israel."

Related:

'A Palestinian Rosa Parks is needed': Israel's segregated buses spark outrage

A $1 billion bet on peace: Qatar funds huge Palestinian settlement in West Bank

Full Israel coverage from NBC News


Discuss this post

Thats great.

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:40 AM EDT

Love it. I never understood how a government (which we heavily support) allows so many people to do nothing but study religion and procreate when the rest of the country actually works for a living and both, (non-orthodox) men and women, are conscripted to protect the land - and those who study religion all day. Talk about a handout. Maybe if the orthodox began contributing to the state then the US could cut back on all that money we keep forking over every year when we're broke ourselves.

  • 11 votes
#1.1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:27 PM EDT

Well said NFIL.

It is freaking unbelievable our own senators willing to cut grandma's social security and send that money to these ungrateful freeloaders.

It is about a BILLION dollars US gave to Israel for the Iron Condom project alone. Israel would not need the system in the first place if it did not operate concentration camps where they seem to kill palestinian women & children at will.

  • 8 votes
#1.2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:37 PM EDT

Those poor innocent Palestinians....they can hardly blow up Israeli schools and buses any more. It must be difficult for them.

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:06 PM EDT

The first 2 posters -

In your favorite muslim countries they hang, shoot, behead even crucify people (read today's news), in Israel, a democrartic country is moving forward in forming a new, less theocratic and more liberal government. And you find a way to criticize them? Kudos to them.

  • 5 votes
#1.4 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:15 PM EDT

It's understandable.

Bibi's right-wing government kept giving Palestinians excuses not to negotiate. The centrist government will be working harder toward negotiations, Palestinians will refuse (of cause), but they wont be nearly as convincing when they try blame it all on Bibi, which will be bad for pr.

Sikie and others like him simply can not admit that they are sad about this change in Israeli government.

    #1.5 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:50 PM EDT

    Hey farideh kardashian stay on the subject. Stop your racist trolling....

      #1.6 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:01 AM EDT

      Of cause, only racist trolls would have a problems with beheading and hangings, right?

        #1.7 - Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:01 PM EDT
        Reply

        This puts Bibi in a bad situation. The loss of the education portfolio is bad because he has resisted the tide of "revisionist" historians and protected the Haredim educational process. The complete loss of a Haredim voice in the cabinet is bad because the government is chafing under huge subsidies to the Haredim as well as their exemption from military service. (Between the Arab Israeli citizens and the Haredim, almost 50% of the population is exempt from military service, pissing off the other 50%.)

        But even worse is that Bibi has Obama as President and has been talking up a war with Iran that requires US participation to be successful. Obama is unlikely to cooperate unless the threat is absolutely demonstrable. And world attention may turn to North Korea and away from Iran is Kim conducts the expected provocation.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:47 AM EDT

        Perhaps this will lead to REAL and PRODUCTIVE NEGOTIATIONS with the P.L.O and Hamas...In the West Bank and Gaza...We have had nothing but BIBI'S Posturing for years ..Pretending to listen..Now he might dig the Orthodox gunk outta his ears and Listen to whats happening in his Own Nation...Perhaps...Perhaps not...But just the fact the ULTRA- Orthodox have been quieted if not silenced in Israel could lead to real movement toward a SOLUTION....A Real solution for the region...that could help....We should thank Mrs. Bibi...in this ..She has given her husband a real Chance to become something other than a tyrant to the Palestinians..He could offer the whole region a CHANCE AT PEACE...Now that is a legacy...not invading Gaza and supporting illegal Settlements in The West Bank...and thumbing your nose at America as you accept billions in Aid...Perhaps BIBI should go back to the UN and announce a new plan..ONE OF PEACE ..and a lasting reconciliation with the Arab neighbors..He could take allot of Sting outta the Arab Spring..and perhaps stear these Governments toward REAL DEMOCRACIES....BIBI has a real opportunity here there are many roads he can take... Ones he is familiar with that lead nowhere or road less traveled by him and Conservatives in general..that don't protect the SAME OLD SAME OLD but try SOMETHING NEW......Hey give it a try it might WORK....The Old way sure has NOT...and will not..in the end...the Old way will lead to WAR with your neighbors and Rebellion on your streets...The Conservatives inch toward that year by year...yet are without resolve to TRY SOMETHING NEW....It's the same game here In America as well..Reintroduction of of old ideas that will not work in a Changing and DYNAMIC world and Political reality that face Nations across the Globe...The STATUS QUO ..JUST DON'T CUT IT....It leads to WAR and or conflict every time....BIBI has a window of opportunity here..don't shatter it...Be the Change make the Change happen.....

        • 9 votes
        #3 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:08 PM EDT

        There's nothing to negotiate with Hamas, a terrorist organization sworn to the destruction of Israel and the killing of every Jew.

        .

        • 6 votes
        #3.1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:29 PM EDT

        Hamas is a group of freedom fighters, opposed to Israeli theft of Arab land. We should be supporting Hamas and tell the Israeli parasites to support themselves for a change. We have been supporting their sorry a4$$es for over 50 years.

        Israel's economy is
        thriving in a global economic meltdown. The Jewish state's 2009-12 economic
        growth of 14.7 percent leads all the advanced countries of the world, followed
        by Australia with 10.7; Canada 4.8; United States 3.2; Germany 2.7; France 0.3;
        European Union minus 1.5 percent.

        Israel's economy is thriving, yet they still lobby for more handouts from the USA, who is going broke paying for the 2 wars for Israel in Afganistan and Iraq. Both wars were fought to secure gas and oil pipelines for Israel.

        Once the Pentagon's choice to lead the "new" Iraq, Chalabi
        promised to reopen an old British-built pipeline from Kirkuk in northern Iraq
        to the Israeli port of Haifa. The plan impressed Richard Perle, Douglas Feith
        and other conservatives influencing Bush administration policy toward Iraq in
        the lead-up to last year's war.

        The idea also drew enthusiastic response from Israel.

        "The pipeline would be a dream," Yosef Paritzky, Israel's minister
        of infrastructures, said as reported by Salon.com. "We'd have an
        additional source of supply, and could even export some of the crude through
        Haifa. But we'd need a treaty with Iraq . . . to build the pipeline."

        Once Chalabi assumed a position of influence in the new Iraqi government,
        Israel would get its treaty, the neoconservatives were assured.

        http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/19725/iraq-to-haifa-oil-pipeline-could-spur-economic-rebirth/

        • 4 votes
        #3.2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:53 PM EDT

        radical muslim ralph -

        No matter what the subject is, you crawl from under your rock and post "pipeline" non sense over and over again. Israel is demonstrating the ultimate freedom anf democracy in their electionand cabinet coalition process. Your Iranian ayatollahs do not. The article is talking about finally cutting off some of power the orthodox crowd had in their cabinet. Your Iranian theocrats are dead set on being a theocratic dictatorship.

        These things don't set well with you - goes against your agenda - so you have to cut and paste other repeated stupid things.

        • 5 votes
        #3.3 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:03 PM EDT

        This is where Ralphy boy gets his information:

        Jew as world parasite

        http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/weltparasit.htm

        I see you use the word "parasites" in many of your postings. Where did you get your terminology?

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eternal_Jew_(1940_film)

        Jews as an uncivilized and parasitic people

        http://brainz.org/10-most-evil-propaganda-techniques-used-nazis/

        The Nazi Party accused them of being a parasitic race that attached itself to capitalist nations to destabilize the economy and culture of their ‘host’ nation"

        Credits to the person who previosuly posted this. KPR37?

        • 5 votes
        #3.5 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:22 PM EDT

        @Coloradoboy: I agree the ultra-orthodox should have little if any say in politics. But Hamas must first abrogate its covenant of genocide.

        The desire of the Muslims to commit Jewish genocide has existed since the days of Allah and did not start with the onset of the Arab-Israeli conflict. With regards to imposing Sharia law, they make no distinction between lands originally Muslim and lands that they conquered by force. They are also not in favor of “peaceful solutions,” and prefer to kill or be killed. They believe that the Jews started the French Revolution and the first and second world wars and their views on Jews and financial institutions are comparable to the Nazis. They claim freedom of all religions under Islam though go on to say that “Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Moslem people” and that “Peace and quiet would not be possible except under the wing of Islam.”

        See: “Avalon Project: Hamas Covenant 1988,” Yale University School of Law for more information.

        http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp

        • 4 votes
        #3.6 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:30 PM EDT

        Basil - If Arabs had wanted to eradicate Jews from what is now called Israel, they could have done so when they held 90% of the land, which had been the case for more than a thousand years. Muslims held the land during most of that time, yet the Jews still lived among them, without any fear. The Muslims of 1000 years ago, lived by the same rules as those of today. There was no program to wipe out Jews.

        Since Israel was established, by taking the land of Arabs, Israeli Jews have systematically taken more and more Arab land and water resources, using security as their reason. When Israel decides the time is right for expansion, they have instigated attacks, through assasinations of leaders, false flag attacks, building illegal settlements on Arab lands and plowing in another countries fields. See below:

        “Moshe Dayan, the celebrated
        commander who, as Defense Minister in 1967, gave the order to conquer the
        Golan...[said] many of the firefights with the Syrians were deliberately
        provoked by Israel, and the kibbutz residents who pressed the Government to
        take the Golan Heights did so less for security than for the farmland...[Dayan
        stated] ‘They didn’t even try to hide their greed for the land...We would send
        a tractor to plow some area where it wasn’t possible to do anything, in the
        demilitarized area, and knew in advance that the Syrians would start to shoot.
        If they didn’t shoot, we would tell the tractor to advance further, until in
        the end the Syrians would get annoyed and shoot.

        And then we would use artillery and
        later the air force also, and that’s how it was...The Syrians, on the fourth
        day of the war, were not a threat to us.’” The New York Times, May 11, 1997

        It is kind of tough to argue the facts, when I have posted the admissions of the actual perpetrators.

        Farideh gets angry when I post as proof about the Iraq war being fought for the 42"oil pipeline from Iraq to Israel in an article from the Jerusalem Post, with comments from an Israeli official. She demonstrates her own stupidity.

        Lets take a look at some comments of Israeli leaders to see how peaceful they are toweards Arabs.

        . "We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation,
        and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab
        population."

        Israel Koenig, "The Koenig Memorandum"

        "I don't know something called International Principles. I vow
        that I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The
        Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the
        Palestinian child’s existence infers that generations will go on, but the man
        causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a
        Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With
        one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956).... I wanted to
        encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian women is a
        slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we
        shall do but we tell others what they shall do."

        Ariel Sharon, current Prime Minister, in an interview with
        General Ouze Merham, 1956

        Sharon said this back in 1956, when there was no PLO or Hamas. The PLO and Hamas were formed to combat this bloodthirsty animal's mentality. How do like me throwing Sharon's words in your Zionist faces, guys?

        "We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live
        here as slaves."

        Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of
        General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.

        • 3 votes
        #3.7 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:04 PM EDT

        "An article archived on the Media Monitors Web site is filled with questionable assertions and bogus quotes (some of which were debunked in Part I.) The following quote (which also appears on the MIFTAH Web site) was attributed to Israeli Northern District Commissioner Israel Koenig, supposedly from his controversial report on Israeli Arabs in Galilee:

        We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.

        Source given: Cited in Lustick, Ian, Arabs in the Jewish State, University of Texas Press, Texas, 1980.

        Investigation: Neither the source given (Ian Lustick's Arabs in the Jewish State) nor the actual report itself contains any mention of "terror, assassination, intimidation or land confiscation".

        The Koenig Report or “memorandum” as it is sometimes referred to, was a private document of recommendations written in 1975 by civil servant Israel Koenig, the Interior Ministry’s official in charge of the Galilee, to alter the demographic balance of the region in favor of the Jews. The recommendations were rejected by then Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin, denounced by senior Cabinet ministers and rued by then foreign minister Yigal Alon who expressed great regret that the recommendations were ever written. It provoked controversy within Israel after being leaked to AlHamishmar, the publication of Israel’s Marxist party, Mapam. Koenig’s recommendations included expanding and strengthening Israel’s Jewish presence in the Galilee, applying legal consequences to Arabs expressing hostility toward the state and Zionism, enforcing tax collection from the Arab sector, cutting family subsidies to Arabs with large families, eliminating preferential acceptance of Arabs into Israeli universities, channeling Arab students into studying the physical and natural sciences rather than humanities, and encouraging young Arabs to study abroad and emigrate. As controversial as Koenig’s proposals were at the time, however, there was absolutely no suggestion of sing "terror," "assassination," "intimidation" or "land confiscations."

        Summary: Fabricated quote, false source

        MIFTAH (www.miftah.org)

        Of the “memorable quotes” featured on MIFTAH’s Web site (some of which have already been debunked in Part I), the following is attributed to one Chairman Heilbrun:

        We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.

        Source given: Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983

        Investigation: The quote is found on numerous anti-Israel sites, in addition to MIFTAH’s, but the facts do not check out. While Shlomo Lahat was indeed re-elected as mayor of Tel Aviv in 1983, no record was found of any “Chairman Heilbrun.” The quote was traced to a 1988 book, The Hidden History of Zionism, by radical Marxist Ralph Schoenman (dismissed by mainstream historians as a crazed conspiracy theorist),
        and is one of many bogus quotes in the book attributed to Israeli leaders. According to Schoenman’s footnote, the quote by Heilbrun was hearsay relayed to him in private conversations:

        Cited by Fouzi El-Asmar and Salih Baransi during discussions with the author, October 1983

        Needless to say, Schoenman’s scholarship, upon which many anti-Israel Web sites depend, leaves much wanting. CAMERA contacted former Mayor Lahat who attested that he has never employed, known or heard of any such person as “Chairman Heilbrun,” and that the reported incident never took place. Lahat also emphasized that he would never allow any of his employees to make such statements, as it completely contradicts his own sentiments about Palestinians.

        Summary: Fabricated quote, fabricated source”

        • 4 votes
        #3.8 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:45 PM EDT

        Ralph:

        All countries, possessing the ability to do so, engage in covert and subversive activities as a means of self-preservation, including Israel. Israel is, however, one of the very few countries surrounded by enemies that have been hell-bent on its destruction since 1948. And it is not the existence of “Israel” per-se that is the problem. Historically, the Jewish people have been a convenient whipping post for the disillusioned and disenfranchised because they never fought back. They did, however, start doing so in 1948 and the world, unaccustomed to Jews fighting back, didn’t like it. Israel is merely a rationalization for your inbred, obsessive hatred of the Jews, and whether you verbally attack the Jews, Israel, or the concept of Zionism is, therefore, immaterial. Your unitary focus on Israel, to the exclusion of all other countries that do or would behave similarly or even worse under similar circumstances, exposes you for the fundamentally hypocritical, bigoted, intolerant, and hateful person that you are. But make no mistake about it, the Jewish people will continue to fight the likes of you and will ultimately prevail because we are, and always have been, on the side of the righteous.

        • 4 votes
        #3.9 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:49 PM EDT

        The above was taken from:
        Exposing False Zionist Quotes II (Quote Busters II) by Ricki Hollander (October 4, 2004)

        ""* MIFTAH (The Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy), an organization under the helm of Hanan Ashrawi, aims to "increase global awareness and knowledge of Palestinian realities by providing reliable, accurate and comprehensive information, policy analysis, strategic briefings and position papers." [emphasis added] To that stated end, the organization dispenses information on its Web site, among which are quotes attributed to Zionist leaders under the heading "Memorable Quotes."

        * Media Monitors describes itself as "a non-profit, non-bias [sic] and non-political platform which mainly helps to prevail the whole truth and generally facilitate answers to any disputed, controversial topic being broadcast, web cast, published, distributed or telecast in the world media." It calls upon journalists, editors, writers, reporters, researchers, columnists, content providers, etc. to join the organziation "to counter information warfare and fabricated propaganda in the world media." An article on its Web site entitled "Apartheid in the Holy Land: Racism in the Zionist State of Israel" is filled with racist quotes by Zionist leaders.

        British journalist Robert Fisk, known for his virulent anti-Israel sentiment, wrote a column for The
        Independent
        in April 2001 entitled: "When Journalists Refuse to Tell the Truth About Israel." Suggesting that journalists fear being "slandered" as anti-Semites, he accuses them of covering up Israel's supposed guilt thus "abetting terrible deeds in the Middle East." Of the "truths" journalists are being censured for refusing to tell are several contemptuous quotes attributed to Israel's leaders.

        All of the above rally against those who hide the truth or fabricate propaganda, while puporting to reveal the hidden facts. Their hypocrisy is mind-boggling as they disseminate "truths" that are anything but that.

        In Part I of our series on misquotes, we showed how the attribution of invidious statements to Israel's
        leaders has become a popular stratagem among Israel's enemies, with many quotes fabricated, taken out of context or otherwise manipulated to present a distorted, negative view of Zionist intentions and actions. Part II will examine some of the misquotes presented by self-proclaimed purveyors of truth."

        For more on false Zionist quotes, click here.

        Also check out CAMERA's "Urban Myths and Misquotes"

        MIFTAH (www.miftah.org)"

        Exposing False Zionist Quotes II (Quote Busters II)

        • 4 votes
        #3.10 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:10 PM EDT

        Ralphy boy:

        The following was also taken from:
        Exposing False Zionist Quotes II (Quote Busters II) by Ricki Hollander (October 4, 2004)

        "Hanan Ashrawi routinely propagates the common but false claim that land not owned by Jews in Palestine in 1948 belonged to Palestinian Arabs. In fact, historically, under Ottoman and British rule, most of the land was government owned. According to statistics from the Survey of Palestine, which was published in 1946 by British Mandate authorities, and later republished by the PLO-affiliated Institute for Palestine Studies, Jews owned 8.6 percent of the land and Arabs owned 28.6 percent. But the Arab total included Bedouin grazing land (8.4 percent) and waste land (13.4 percent), neither of which was legally ownable according to the prevailing Turkish and British land laws. Not counting Bedouin grazing land and waste land, Arab owned land totaled only 6.8 percent. But, even if one counts land in these categories as Arab owned, the majority of land in Palestine in 1948 was state land, which did not belong to Palestinian private owners. Because there was never a sovereign Palestinian Arab state, this state land cannot be said to have ever have been "Palestinian owned."

        http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_article=864&x_context=2

        http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=7&x_issue=21&x_article=775

        • 5 votes
        #3.11 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:25 PM EDT

        Basil- The Zionists have been exposed by their own words, thanks to the internet. The rest of the world has known about the duplicity of Israel and her leaders for years. Americans are now catching up fast. The time is nearing when Israel will be alone and isolated from any friends in the international community.

        Imagine, all those Jews in one country, with no one to screw but themselves. How will they ever survive.

        Americans must vote out any politicians who support Israel in any way. Get rid of the Cantors, the Engles, the Lindsey Grahams and the Mitch McConnells of this country, who put Israel's needs ahead of those of America. If they won't even bring up cutting aid to Israel, in this economic environment, then they are unfit to serve America. Vote them out and end all aid to Israel.

        • 3 votes
        #3.12 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 5:06 PM EDT

        Thank you Basil. You have articulated well. Ralph has always been the fanatical jew hater that he is - same as his idol ahmadinejad and the theocratic mullahs, and he will never accept the fact that Israel is civilized and democratic by comparison. Let him hate. It is really bothering him that there is a democratic process, political coalition, and real elections in Israel. ralph has never experienced that in muslim countries.

        • 4 votes
        #3.13 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:06 PM EDT

        farideh you are as smart and educated as the kardashians... There are 24 Arabic countries around the world. You base you knowledge on faux news whidh focus on the negatives and more on tribal areas. Your ignorance is turning into racism ms. kardashian...

        • 2 votes
        #3.14 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:07 AM EDT

        Then let's hear about something good accomplished by those Arabic countries, we all would love that.

        • 1 vote
        #3.15 - Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:02 PM EDT
        Reply

        "Blame the wife. That's what the analysts here say. Bennett, who was once Netanyau's chief of staff, had a major falling out with Sara Netanyahu, ending in bad blood between him and the prime minister."

        I'm wondering if Sara wanted a threesome with Bibi and Naftali, to which Naftali said YES first, but then he said to better not do it. That upset her a lot and now Bibi has problems.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#4 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:12 PM EDT

        Maybe Benny should have kept his mouth out of the US election process. Nothing like bad mouthing the leader of the nation that you get all of your support from. Not a very smart politician. I bet the pillow talk is interesting at his house: He "why did you have to pick a fight with Bennett" She : Why did you bad mouth the Pres. of the US" He " Mitt promised he would win" She " and you believed that false prophet".

        • 3 votes
        Reply#5 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:01 PM EDT

        If I were Obam, I would have cut all aid and trade to Israel to force this Nut out of Israeli politics.

        • 2 votes
        #5.1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:23 PM EDT

        I am sure you would.

        If I were Obama, I would cut all aid to Egypt and Pakistan, which I am sure you wouldn't.

          #5.2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:44 PM EDT

          Eli, guess what, it was pro Israel factions that stopped a bill to end aid to Egypt. The arguement was that it would be harmful to Israel.

          We supply aid tp Pakistan in order for them tompermit the TAPI gas pipeline to run through Pakistan to India. Since the TAPI gas pipeline would be transporting Israeli owned gas, it would be hurting Israel to stop that aid. I guess you are too dumb to figure it out. We are in Afghanistan and Pakistan because of Israel.

          Oil companies proposed the pipeline in 1995, but
          it dropped off their agenda after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan the
          following year. The plan was revived after the United States-led invasion of
          Afghanistan in 2001, and received backing from the Asian Development Bank,
          which financed feasibility studies.

          Iran
          can sell gas to India at a third the price of Turkmenistan. This is the ENTIRE
          issue. In Turkmenistan Israel holds the lease rights to sell this gas and US
          companies are building the pipeline called TAPI. This has gotten Iran upset and
          that is what the whole reason for petroleum sanctions. We have US military
          holding the Taliban at bay in the North all the while prince and his private
          paramilitary mercenary forces are executing pipeline security privately in the
          South to lend some sort of propriety to this whole sham of a war.

          Stop aid to Pakistan, Egypt and above all, Israel.

            #5.3 - Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:31 AM EDT

            So, what you are saying is that Egypt and Pakistan can't even manage to buy something without receiving something for free along with it.

            Well, I say they will learn if they have to.

            I don't mind aid cut of to Israel, as long as aid is also stopped to their enemies (including Palestinians), if Israel does not have to worry about loosing aid, they wont hold back next time they are attacked and give all your terrorist friends exactly what they deserve.

            If you are OK with that, good for you.

              #5.4 - Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:56 PM EDT
              Reply

              When 50% have to serve and put their butts on the line while the other 50% stay home, have babies and study religion, naturally there will be problems.

              "You can't always get what you want"...

              • 3 votes
              Reply#6 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:01 PM EDT

              Who the fu***ck cares!

                Reply#7 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:02 PM EDT

                So far, nine (9) out of (12) posts are anti Israel - notwithstanding the fact that they are going through positive reforms with their new cabinet. And that tells me how many liberal leftists and radical muslims here are on welfare typing away at their computers all day.

                As the Imams in UK and Deerborn were saying: Collect welfare from host countries and use your own money to support Jihad against the infidel.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#8 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:07 PM EDT

                We have Welfare to work now. No one sits home and get s Welfare without having to work anymore. You want to see real Welfare, look back before the Cold war ended and we needed a Manpower Pool to face down the Soviet Union. Where do you think that Manpower Pool came from? You guessed it, Welfare Babies. The Cold War ended and then Bill Clinton Changed Welfare to Welfare to work.

                The Welfare you envision no longer exists just like the Soviet Union no longer exists.

                Reagan s War on So-called "Welfare Queens" does not exist anymore. It's people like you who try and keep it alive with your "Dog Whistle" sound bytes.

                • 6 votes
                #8.1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:17 PM EDT

                farideh,

                Posts that you think that are anti-israeli are actually pro-israeli. I personally want to help isreal by pointing out what stinks about them. so that they can fix it.

                It just happens to be there are way too many man things that stinks..

                • 3 votes
                #8.2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:28 PM EDT

                I personally want to help isreal

                Good grief lan...you want to help isreal??? LOL You can't help yourself. You can't spell it and don't even realize that it's capitalized. Go see a doctor and get yourself healthy and energized. Maybe you'll be able to make posts that make sense for a change.

                • 3 votes
                #8.3 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:00 PM EDT

                Chief (Or Chef?)

                I think it should be named Jewstan, no?

                • 1 vote
                #8.4 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 5:49 PM EDT

                Well, it does include a province called Judea, but you and yours insist on calling it West Bank for some reason.

                • 1 vote
                #8.5 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:44 PM EDT

                Farideh wrote - "So far, nine (9) out of (12) posts are anti Israel". Good observation farideh. It means Americans are getting fed up with supporting a nation of parasites, who have been fleecing America since the day Israel was formed. Each year, Israel gets more and more brazen in its behavior and demands upon America for funding.

                Last year we paid for their "Iron Dome", to the tune of a billion dollars. Israel got the Iron Dome, America got the bill.

                • 1 vote
                #8.6 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:37 PM EDT

                Or may be it means that the supporters of terrorism struggle desperately because they are loosing footing.

                US used to be completely on the side of Arabs, until Arabs started accepting support from USSR, that gave Americans a little jab, and since then they have been waking up more and more.

                Soon they will wake up completely.

                  #8.7 - Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:58 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Will be interesting to see how Bibi conducts himself in regards to Iran, Squatters, and the Palestinians--maybe a hint of peace at the end of the tunnel? Bibi just got smacked upside the head, wake up call?

                  The ultra-religious right needs to be curbed, nasty and menacing--try walking anywhere near one of their enclaves on a Saturday, near riot conditions, oh an forget being a woman, hurled insults, rock throwing, spat upon. Literally frothing at the mouth--just as bad as crazed Islamics. Amazing, considering most Hasidim are anti-Zionists but yet belly-up to the Israeli trough.

                  Wonder how Iran is going to react, if at all, probably same old beligerent, saber rattling. Of course the President will be as pragmatic as ever during his visit and afterward.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#9 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:16 PM EDT

                  The people of Israel could solve many of their problems, including many of their security problems, if they would adopt something other than a theocracy, which is clearly what they have now no matter what they may claim. They should institute a secular government with an absolute guarantee of freedom of religion, coupled with a prohibition against funding religious activities with government (i.e., taxpayer) money. If some of their people want to not work and spend all their time studying ancient mythology (i.e., the Torah) that's fine, but let them support themselves or find their own means of support through donors and beneficiaries. Can you imagine the outcry that would result if the USA government funneled money to fundamentalist Christians so they could sit on their butts and study the Bible all day every day? It's absolutely unthinkable. Theocracy is evil!

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#10 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:22 PM EDT

                  Any setback for the religionists in any theocracy is a good thing.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#12 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:39 PM EDT

                  there are not 10% of israel population haredim,there are much less and bibi doesn't want them in the gouvernment.nobody in his right mind wants them.but of course he didn't want somebody with power to match his.

                    Reply#13 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:39 PM EDT

                    He always gets what he wants from the US government; why worry about his own?

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#14 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:41 PM EDT
                    shami325Deleted

                    Whether more or less flexible than the last government, the path to peace will still be very rough--

                    1. Any agreement reached between Israel and the Palestinian Authority would be rejected by a large number of Palestinians, especially Palestinian refugees who continue to insist on the "right of return" to their former villages inside Israel.

                    2. A majority of Arabs and Muslims would also reject a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, especially in wake of the "Arab Spring," which has seen the rise of Islamists to power in a number of Arab countries.

                    3. Even if a Palestinian state were established in the West Bank, Hamas and other groups would work to take control of it and, with the help of Iran and Al-Qaeda, turn it into a launching pad for attacking Israel and other neighbors.

                    4. Most Palestinians do not see the US as an honest broker.

                    5. With the exception of Fatah, all Palestinian organizations -- primarily Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine -- would automatically reject any peace agreement with Israel for various reasons. Some of these groups want to see Israel wiped off the face of the earth, while others believe that Israel would never accept all their demands, such as a full withdrawal to the pre-1967 lines and the release of all Palestinian prisoners.

                    6. The Palestinians are divided into two camps not only geographically, but also ideologically. The first is a radical camp that does not want to deliver on any front: it believes that Israel has no right to exist. The second is the less-radical camp, or the "moderates." This second camp is also not able to deliver: it does not have enough control over the Palestinian territories, let alone a mandate from the Palestinians.

                    7. Abbas is opposed to the idea of reaching an interim agreement with Israel that would lead to the establishment of a temporary Palestinian state on the parts of the West Bank that are controlled by the Palestinian Authority.

                    http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3621/palestinians-obama-visit

                    Additionally, the elected terms have expired for the presidents of Gaza and the West Bank, but who's counting, right?

                    • 4 votes
                    Reply#16 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:57 PM EDT

                    I am neither an Israeli or Persian but it is ironic or perhaps amusing to watch Bibi Netanyahu is trying to force Americans hands into going to war with Iran solely to buster his fame in Israel regardless the damage it will do to world peace and most especially American credibility and standing in the world. If Iranian do have a nuclear weapon who on earth think they will actually use it against Israel knowing very well that America will turn their country to desert. But if Israel was to foolishly attack Iran with the aid of America or not, Netanyahu would have single handedly destroy what the world and many Jews have build with blood and tears. Israel would not survive all the might and the hangs of the surrounding Arabs even if they have all the might and power of America and their stupid naive coward politician who cow-tale to the whim of the "Israeli lobbies" against the best interest of America and the rest of world. Anyone who thinks America should be lead by the nose by Netanyahu (according to Bibi) into war with Iran because they have or want nuclear weapon must be missing a huge chung of their thinking faculty.

                    Called it anti Israel or whatever you like, right now Israel is committing a war crime in Palestine even their best and the closest pal can not even tell them to stop and think of what damages they are doing. If they think America will remain the biggest player in the world, well they need to wake up and if Israel thinks American politician will forever be lead by the nose, well, it will take just one politician who is brave or crazy enough that wants to make name for himself to say, its time to cut the foreign aid to Israel and then watch the chips collapse. The sequester should wake the Jews and Israel up because if some republican can allow the defence budget cut then wait an see Bibi, you just keep trying to push America into a stupid war and then see people!!! America is changing Ran Paul and likes are coming not only on republican side but some are coming on democrat side soon!!!

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#17 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:57 PM EDT

                    Most Americans and many in the Arab world do think they will use nukes if they accomplish their ambitions. They do think they will use their nuclear power to destroy either by direct or indirect methods. The Saudis have been pushing for Iranian disarmament and Iraq is not keen on Iran getting them either. The Iranian president has clearly stated that he wants Israel to be obliterated. Most of the UN nations do not want Iran to get nukes. Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries have submitted intel about their nuke program and they are worried. With all the sand and sun in that region why would Iran need nuclear power? Solar cells main component is made from sand. The fact that they lie about their nuclear weapons ambitions shows that they can not be trusted with nukes. No country should have them but we sure as hell don't need more getting them especially small countries with delusions of grandeur.

                    • 2 votes
                    #17.1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:54 PM EDT

                    Fight forfreedom- On what evidence do you and the people who think Iran will use a nuclear weapon, base your beliefs? The answer is Israeli propaganda, which is based on nothing. Here is an example:

                    '1992:'Israeli parliamentarian Benjamin Netanyahu tells his
                    colleagues that Iran is 3 to 5 years from being able to produce a nuclear
                    weapon – and that the threat had to be "uprooted by an international front
                    headed by the US"'.

                    Hey look - It is over 20 years since Netanyahu made hisbold prediction and Iran still has no nukes. Furthermore, all our intelligence agencies have concluded Iran does not even have a nuclear weapons program. What have you to say about that fact?

                    Iran has not started a war with another country in almost 200 years and you fearlessly predict they will nuke Israel with weapon they do not have and have not been working on. You are as off the wall as Netanyahu.

                    • 2 votes
                    #17.2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 5:17 PM EDT

                    "Iran has not started a war with another country in almost 200 years"

                    Keep posting that lie over and over again. Iran attacked the US embassy (US territory) in 1979, then USS Stark, a Navy Ship (a US territory), not to mention numerous attacks on our Marines, soldiers and civilians.

                    Enough of your lies. I know the more you say it, the more you think will believe it. May be, stupid people.

                    • 4 votes
                    #17.3 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:18 PM EDT

                    Is that as many times as israel attacked us?

                    • 2 votes
                    #17.4 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:31 PM EDT

                    No, in Iran's case it's more than zero.

                      #17.5 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:45 PM EDT

                      farideh, you keep posting that Iran attacked the Cole, the emabassy, the Stark, but never offer any proof. The perpetrators of the Cole were caught and they were not from Iran. If there was proof Iran attacked any of those entities, don't you think we would have responded with a war?

                      I say again, Iran has not started a war with any country in more than 100 years. If you disagree, please name the war, instead of posting allegations based on Israeli proaganda or pulled out of your anus.

                        #17.6 - Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:37 AM EDT

                        The war between Israel and Lebanon, by sponsoring Hezbollah.

                        The war between Israel and Gaza, by sponsoring Hamas.

                          #17.7 - Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:00 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          RALPH - HERE IS TO PROVE ANOTHER ONE OF YOUR LIES AND PROPAGANDA:

                          Iran's atomic energy chief admits to giving
                          the IAEA false information
                          Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani, head of the
                          Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, admitted to the London-based al-Hayat
                          newspaper Thursday that Tehran had fed the nuclear watchdog false information to
                          protect its nuclear facilities and progress. "Sometimes we made ourselves appear
                          weak and at other times we reported issues that made us appear strongly than we
                          really were," he said.
                          Abbasi estimated that the Iranian nuclear program
                          would come up again before the Security Council in November and if this step
                          fails, a US military operation will come after the US presidential
                          election.

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#18 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:21 PM EDT

                          I know where israel stole their nukes from.

                            #18.1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:29 PM EDT

                            May be from the same place as China and NK did? but, you know that Israelis are a lot smarter than that. They are advanced in science and technology, including your smartphone, and they make a much needed heartburn medicine that definitely will help you.

                            • 4 votes
                            #18.2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:18 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.