In what police called "the perfect robbery," bandits made off with millions of Euros in an ambush Monday on two armored security vans in northern Italy. 

The meticulously planned attack involved about a dozen men who fired smoke bombs and more than 50 shots to frighten security crews on the trucks. Astonishingly, no one was injured in the hail of bullets on the A9 highway between Milan and Como, police said.

Police told the Milan newspaper Il Giornale that the operation — which was "planned with the precision of a paramilitary operation" — went down this way:

Wearing police clothing, the bandits blocked traffic on the highway by setting fire to a truck about 7 a.m. (1 a.m. ET). Once the armored vans came along, they parked another truck behind them, hemming them in. 

---

Firing Kalashnikov rifles into the air, the thieves set off a smoke bomb beneath one of the trucks to fool the guards into abandoning their posts in the belief that it was on fire. They then started unpacking the loot, which included an unspecified haul of gold bullion. 

In an indication of how thoroughly the bandits had studied the security company's routine, they didn't bother with the other truck, knowing it was an empty decoy, police said. The commandos escaped in three cars as police were slowed by nails the crew had scattered at three different locations.

Traffic on the busy motorway, which runs to the Swiss border, was frozen for hours.

The security company, Gruppo Battistolli di Vicenza, said it hadn't yet tabulated the haul, but because it serves banks, major retail groups and other private institutions in the area, the sum was likely to be "a few million Euros."

"They were certainly a gang of professionals, as the job was prepared down to every detail," Marco Melatti, a spokesman for the company, told the Italian news agency ANSA.

Follow M. Alex Johnson on Twitter and Facebook.

Watch World News videos on NBCNews.com

Italy's president on Friday pardoned a U.S. Air Force officer convicted of kidnapping an Egyptian Muslim cleric who was taken away for interrogation on a CIA "rendition" flight.

Such covert flights were among the tactics used to wage the "War on Terror" under the administration of former U.S. President George W. Bush, after the 9/11 attacks. They have been condemned by human rights groups as a violation of international agreements.

Italian President Giorgio Napolitano said he had pardoned Colonel Joseph L. Romano, who was the only person not a member of the CIA among 23 Americans sentenced for the kidnapping of Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr in Milan in 2003.

---

Romano's lawyer had requested the pardon. The clemency was granted because the United States and Italy are close allies that "share the common goals of promoting democracy and security" around the world, a statement from the president said.

The Egyptian cleric, also known as Abu Omar, was secretly flown to Egypt for interrogation, where he says he was tortured for seven months. He was a resident in Italy at the time of the abduction.

Italy was the first country to convict American nationals for their involvement in a rendition.

Romano and 21 others received seven-year jail terms for kidnapping, while the former CIA Milan station chief Robert Seldon Lady was sentenced to nine years in jail.

All were tried in absentia and the Italian government has so far shown little indication it will ask for them to be extradited to serve the terms. No reason was given for why Romano was awarded clemency while the 22 CIA members were not.

U.S. President Barack Obama has tried to distance himself from heavy-handed intelligence tactics employed by the Bush administration, and ordered the CIA to close its long-term prisons in 2009.

Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

An Italian court on Tuesday ordered the retrial of Amanda Knox, the American college student jailed for four years for killing her British roommate, Meredith Kercher, but acquitted after an appeal. Here are some questions and answers arising from the decision:

What just happened here?

The Court of Cassation, the Italian equivalent of the Supreme Court, overturned the acquittals of Knox and her former boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and ordered them to stand trial again before an appeals court in Florence.

---

They had been convicted in 2009 when Knox was sentenced to 26 years in prison and Sollecito got 25 years. An appeals court freed both of them when it overturned the convictions in 2011, ruling that prosecutors had provided faulty DNA evidence, no murder weapon and otherwise insufficient proof.

 

What was the basis for Tuesday's court ruling?

We don’t know yet. Italian law gives the court three months to explain its decision. In the American system, an appeals court would generally explain itself upon issuing the ruling.

Any idea what they might be thinking?

Prosecutors have filed 16 points of appeal — essentially disputes over how the law was applied at trial, not over the facts of the case. Among other points, prosecutors question the appeals court’s ruling that DNA testing was faulty and that certain witnesses were unreliable.

This sounds an awful lot like double jeopardy.

Italian law prohibits a version of double jeopardy — being tried anew for a crime for which you have already been cleared, said Praxilla Trabattoni, an Italian lawyer who was followed the case. This case is technically different.

Trabattoni said that the Supreme Court was essentially saying that "when the appeals court was evaluating whether she did it or didn’t, the appeals court did that on the basis of evidence that shouldn’t have been admitted.”

Italian law says that a judgment is not definitive until it’s cleared every degree of trial, Trabattoni said, and the Supreme Court is considered the third degree of trial, after the lower court and the appeals court. If the Supreme Court had upheld the acquittal and then prosecutors had brought a new case entirely, that would be considered double jeopardy under the Italian system, Trabattoni said.

What happens next?

After the Supreme Court issues its explanation, an appeals court in Florence gets the case. A retrial probably would not begin until late this year or early next year.

Where is Amanda Knox these days?

She is a student at the University of Washington, where she stayed up until at least about 2 a.m. Pacific time to learn her fate, one of her lawyers, Carlo Dalla Vedova, told reporters, according to The Associated Press. Now 25, she has a memoir, “Waiting to Be Heard,” coming out April 30, for which publisher HarperCollins reportedly paid her $4 million.

In a statement Tuesday, she said: “No matter what happens, my family and I will face this continuing legal battle as we always have, confident in the truth and with our heads held high in the face of wrongful accusations and unreasonable adversity.” 

Does she have to go back to Italy for the retrial?

No. And it appears unlikely that she will. Knox spent almost four years behind bars after her original arrest and conviction, before the appeals court reversed it. The retrial can go forward without Knox being present.

“It simply will proceed, it will be strenuously defended, and we fully expect she will be exonerated,” one of her lawyers, Theodore Simon, told NBC News.

What happens if the conviction is reinstated? Does she get sent back to jail in Italy?

We’re several big steps away from that, but it’s possible. First, Knox would have to be convicted by the appeals court. Then the Italian Supreme Court would have to uphold that verdict. Then Italy would have to seek Knox’s extradition from the United States.

The United States and Italy have an extradition treaty under which the U.S. would be bound to send Knox back, said Juliet Sorensen, who teaches international criminal law at the Northwestern University School of Law.

Such a decision would risk a political furor here at home. Knox has been portrayed by the American media as someone caught up in a hopelessly dysfunctional Italian legal system.

Still, if the conviction is reinstated, “I expect that Italy will make that request because it’s a serious crime,” Sorensen said. “At the end of the day, if she’s convicted of murder, I don’t foresee the Italian authorities letting it drop.”

And Meredith Kercher’s family? What do they make of this?

Kercher’s sister Stephanie, 29, told ITV News, the British partner of NBC News, that all the family ever wanted was the truth about the night of Nov. 1, 2007.

“We are never going to be happy about any outcome because we have still lost Meredith, but we obviously support the decision and hope to get answers from it,” she said.

What became of Sollecito, the boyfriend?

He released his own book last year: "Honor Bound: My Journey to Hell and Back with Amanda Knox." In it, he reportedly wrote that police slapped and stripped him during an interrogation, and that they tried to get him to save himself by turning on Knox.

These days he is 29 and studying in Verona, according to British newspaper reports.

Giulia Bongiorno, one of his lawyers, stressed that the Supreme Court ruling was not the same as a conviction.

“Unfortunately we have to continue the battle,” she told reporters, according to Reuters. “This is a sentence that says, with regards to the acquittal, that something more is needed.”

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Related:

Italy court: Amanda Knox to be retried for Meredith Kercher murder

Revealed: Why court cleared Amanda Knox

Report: Amanda Knox 'loves Italy' and might return

Amanda Knox was ordered to stand trial again for the murder of her roommate by Italy's top criminal court on Tuesday, but there appeared to be little the country could do to force her to return for the new hearings.

The Court of Cassation, Italy's final court of appeal, overturned the acquittals of both Knox and her then-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito over the 2007 killing of British student Meredith Kercher.

---

In a statement responding to the decision, Knox slammed prosecutors and vowed to fight on.

"It was painful to receive the news that the Italian Supreme Court decided to send my case back for revision when the prosecution's theory of my involvement in Meredith's murder has been repeatedly revealed to be completely unfounded and unfair," said Knox, who is now aged 25 and living in the Seattle area.

"I believe that any questions as to my innocence must be examined by an objective investigation and a capable prosecution," she added. "The prosecution responsible for the many discrepancies in their work must be made to answer for them, for Raffaele's sake, my sake, and most especially for the sake of Meredith's family. Our hearts go out to them."

Knox said that she and her family would “face this continuing legal battle as we always have, confident in the truth and with our heads held high in the face of wrongful accusations and unreasonable adversity."

Kercher, 21, died from knife wounds in an apartment that she shared with Knox in Perugia, Italy.

Prosecutors argued that Knox and Sollecito killed her after a drug-fueled sexual assault in a case that drew worldwide attention.

Young, attractive and with a seemingly bright future, the prosecution’s allegations suggested Knox’s outward appearance belied a secret, more sinister nature.

Knox was routinely referred to by a nickname "Foxy Knoxy" in newspapers as every detail of her life was examined.

She and Sollecito, who turned 29 on Tuesday, were prosecuted and found guilty of killing Kercher. Knox was sentenced to 26 years in prison, while Sollecito got 25, but they were acquitted after serving four years.

Small-time drug dealer Rudy Hermann Guede, who knew Knox, was convicted and given a 16-year sentence.

Meredith’s sister Stephanie Kercher, 29, told Britain's ITV News that the family welcomed the court's decision to retry Knox and Sollecito "in the sense that we hope to find the answers."

"We are never going to be happy about any outcome because we have still lost Meredith, but we obviously support the decision and hope to get answers from it," she said. "There are still so many unanswered questions, all we have ever wanted to do is do what we can for Meredith and to find out the truth of what happened that night."

"Rudy Guede's conviction was on the basis that there was more than one person there so that is something that needs to be looked into," she added.

Francesco Maresca, a lawyer representing Kercher's family, said in a statement on Monday that the acquittals were "defective" and "lacked transparency," Reuters reported.

"There was a lot of external pressure and the judge showed a will from the start to acquit," Maresca said.

Italian law cannot compel Knox to return to Italy and she could be tried in absentia.

Knox’s attorney, Theodore Simon, told TODAY that the student and her family were confident her acquittal would be upheld.

He characterized the outcome of Tuesday’s court decision as a "revision" of the case, as opposed to a retrial, saying: "Merely because they have sent it back for revision does not mean that anything else will happen other than she will be recognized as not guilty and the same thing will happen again."

“From what I understand, [Court of Cassation judges] have sent [the case] back for revision and reconsideration. They will review it. They may simply affirm that there was a ‘not guilty’ before and it should remain the same. They may seek to take some further evidence, but nothing has really changed.”

Simon said there was no reason for Knox to have to return to Italy, saying her presence was "no issue" in Tuesday’s ruling.

The Italian appellate court hearing the case could declare her in contempt of court but that carries no additional penalties.

"If the court orders another trial, if she is convicted at that trial and if the conviction is upheld by the highest court, then Italy could seek her extradition," another of Knox's lawyers, Carlo Dalla Vedova, told The Associated Press. 

Since her release from prison in 2011, Knox has resumed her studies in Seattle.

Knox's book about the case is due to be released in April. 

Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report. ITV News is the U.K. partner of NBC News.

Related:

Revealed: Why court cleared Amanda Knox

Report: Amanda Knox 'loves Italy' and might return

Italian judge slams Amanda Knox prosecutors

This story was originally published on Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:12 AM EDT

Zimbabwe's long-ruling President Robert Mugabe on Monday arrived in Rome, where he is expected to join other leaders at Tuesday’s installation of Pope Francis.

The 89-year-old is banned from traveling to the European Union amid allegations of human rights abuses and election rigging.

However, the papal state of Vatican City is not part of the EU.

Italy does not to enforce the ban on those using its territory to reach Vatican City, which is encircled by Italy and has no airport of its own.

Pope Francis, the first Jesuit pontiff, will be officially installed as the new leader of the Roman Catholic Church on Tuesday.

---

Heads of state and governments customarily attend, but Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi explained that the Holy See does not make specific invitations, according to the U.K.’s Guardian newspaper.

Lombardi told reporters on Sunday he had "no idea" if Mugabe would be attending, the Guardian said.

Mugabe, a conservative Catholic who has ruled the southern African country since independence from Britain in 1980, last visited the Vatican in April 2011 when he joined world dignitaries for the beatification of Pope John Paul II.

He has staunchly opposed gay rights that he says are immoral and not compatible with African cultural practices in Zimbabwe.

Vice President Joe Biden and the president of Jesuit-run Georgetown University will be among the Americans attending, The Associated Press reported.

Pope Francis, who was the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, met Argentine President Cristina Fernandez on Monday.

The two have been on opposite sides for many years, since Francis had lobbied hard against moves by the country's government to legalize gay marriage and make contraceptives available for free. 

Fernandez said after the meeting that she had asked the pope to intervene in support of Buenos Aires in a dispute with Britain over the Falkland Islands in the South Atlantic, according to Reuters.

"I asked for his intervention to avoid problems that could emerge from the militarization of Great Britain in the south Atlantic," Reuters quoted her as saying. "We want a dialogue and that's why we asked the pope to intervene so that the dialogue is successful.''

Related:

Impromptu appearance, off-the-cuff remarks: Pope's Sunday surprises delight

Pope Francis describes wish for 'poor church for the poor'

Full coverage of Pope Francis from NBC News

 

This story was originally published on Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:28 AM EDT