• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
  • Recommended: 'Leave our lands': Man knifed to death in suspected London terror attack
  • Recommended: American tourist, 68, stabbed in main square of Florence, Italy
  • Recommended: Iran bars two leading candidates from presidential election
  • Recommended: Captain of luxury Costa Concordia cruise ship to face trial over deadly wreck

First for breaking news and analysis: Compelling world news stories from NBC News journalists. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • Advertise | AdChoices
    14
    May
    2013
    12:07pm, EDT

    At least 3 US soldiers killed by Afghanistan bomb

    By John Newland, Staff Writer, NBC News

    At least three U.S. soldiers died Tuesday in southern Kandahar province when their convoy struck a powerful improvised explosive device, officials said.

    The U.S.-led International Security Assistance Force said in a brief statement that three of its members had been killed when their convoy struck the IED in southern Afghanistan. It did not release their nationalities.

    Earlier, however, a NATO spokesman had said four U.S. service members had been killed and others were wounded, The Associated Press reported.

    Reuters also reported that four American service members had been killed, citing Kandahar provincial spokesman Jawid Ahmad Faisal.

    There was no immediate explanation for the differing number of deaths.

    The deaths came just a day after three Georgian solders with the ISAF were killed by an IED in Helmand province.

     

    195 comments

    3 soldiers killed, but the lead story on this site is about wild horses.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, nato, ied, featured, isaf, kandahar, u-s-soldiers, killed-in-action
  • 2
    May
    2013
    7:29am, EDT

    Afghan and Pakistani forces clash in deadly border firefight

    Nisar Ahmad / AP

    Afghans carry the body of a policeman killed in a border clash with Pakistani troops on Thursday.

    By Waj S. Khan, Akbar Shinwari and Kiko Itasaka, NBC News

    An Afghan border police officer was killed and two Pakistani soldiers were injured during a prolonged firefight on the troubled border between the two countries, officials said.

    Pakistan’s Foreign Office said in a statement that it had summoned an Afghan embassy official to protest what it called an “unprovoked firing incident” at a disputed border gate late Wednesday.

    “Two Frontier Constabulary soldiers got injured as a result of the heavy fire directly targeting the post,” the statement said. “Pakistan security forces exercised maximum restraint and communicated first to the Afghan side about this serious violation through military channels.”

    “This is not the first time that the heavy fire was initiated from the Afghan side causing heavy injury and damage to the Pakistani structures,” it added.

    Afghan Ministry of Interior spokesman Sidiq Sidiqqi said the fighting continued into early Thursday.

    “One [Afghan] border policeman was killed. Pakistani and Afghan local officials are holding talks to ease the situation,” he said.

    The latest tensions are focused on Pakistan's building of the military gate at Gursal that Afghan officials say is inside Afghanistan, Reuters reported. Afghan President Hamid Karzai has ordered his top officials to take immediate action to remove the gate and other "Pakistani military installations near the Durand Line."

    The Durand Line is the 1893 British-mandated border between the two countries. It is recognized by Pakistan but not by Afghanistan. Afghanistan maintains that activity by either side along the Durand Line must be approved by both countries.

    Afghans living near the border with Pakistan praised what they saw as Kabul's decision to stand up to Islamabad.

    "Our security forces have done a great job standing up to Pakistan. We are proud because Pakistan keeps on pushing us and will try and occupy us some day. I'm angry about the situation but glad we have acted,” Mohammed Sabil, a taxi driver, said.

    Gula Jan, who works at a gas station near the border, said: "We thought Afghanistan could not do anything against Pakistan -- that we were turning into slaves of Pakistan, but now we know that isn't true, and I back the Afghan government's actions.”

    Afghanistan has grown increasingly frustrated with Pakistan over efforts to pursue an Afghan peace process involving the Taliban, suggesting that Islamabad is intent on keep Afghanistan unstable, Reuters reported.

    Afghan officials say Pakistan has a long history of supporting Afghanistan's Taliban and other insurgent factions, the news service noted. Pakistan has in turn accused Afghanistan of giving safe haven to militants on the Afghan side of the border.

    Reuters contributed to this report.

    Related:

    • Pakistan intelligence agency claims Afghanistan supports Taliban splinter groups
    • Karzai accuses US and Taliban of conspiring to keep troops in Afghanistan
    • Pakistan, Afghanistan trying to turn Taliban into political movement

    59 comments

    Gee, a "major" battle between Afghanistan and Pakistan. One dead, two wounded. I hope they bury all the survivors.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, featured, pakistan, taliban, nato, border, durand-line, waj-khan
  • 28
    Apr
    2013
    11:00am, EDT

    Taliban marks start of 'monumental' spring offensive with deadly attack

    The Taliban has issued a warning that it will increase attacks on foreign military forces in Afghanistan. NBC's Ron Mott reports.

    By Ron Mott, Correspondent, NBC News

    KABUL — It didn’t take long. Within hours of announcing the start of its annual spring offensive,  the Taliban in Afghanistan claimed responsibility for an early-morning attack in the eastern part of the country that killed at least three police officers.

    "In addition to suicide bombings, insurgents warned of coordinating ‘insider’ attacks against ‘foreign transgressors’," the Taliban said in a statement on Sunday.

    The Taliban, known for employing bombastic language in describing its achievements--claims frequently invalidated or unproven--hailed the 2013 spring offensive as "monumental.”

    This year, the Taliban's annual declaration of increased violence--coinciding with the break from harsh winter weather--is widely considered an especially crucial test for President Hamid Karzai's government as it prepares to assume control of the nation's security from coalition forces, which are slated to withdraw combat troops in 2014.

    Abdul Mueed / EPA

    Security officials check a car in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, on Sunday. Security was intensified following the announcement by Taliban militants that they were launching their spring offensive.

    That challenge has been particularly lethal so far in April as Afghan security forces increasingly take the lead in the 11-year war.  The month began with an ambush of a courthouse in western Afghanistan by nine suicide attackers disguised as soldiers that left at least 44 dead, injuring more than 100.

    A few days later, 25-year-old American diplomat Anne Smedinghoff was among five U.S. citizens mortally wounded by a car bombwhile their convoy headed to a school to deliver books. On Friday, 45 people on a bus died in a fiery crash with a burning oil tanker, which had come under insurgent attack. 

    According to The Associated Press, 478 people—217 of these insurgents—have been killed in violence around the country so far in April. A total of 447 people, including 268 insurgents, were killed during the same months in 2012, according to the AP.

    ‘NATO has done nothing’
    In the capital Sunday, storefronts were largely shuttered for Victory Day, commemorating the 1992 defeat of Communist rule, but tailor Zulmai Mohamadi was open for business, lamenting the prolonged conflict and its impact on daily life.

    “NATO has done nothing for us,” the 38-year-old father of seven said. “In the past 11 years, what can I say? They have done nothing. They did whatever they did for their own interests and not for us.

    “Our poor nation is in the same condition of poverty and all those problems. I think the future will remain the same in future years: poverty with a lot of problems.” 

    Others, though, expressed more hopeful sentiments, even amid insurgent threats.

    Slideshow: Afghanistan: Nation at a crossroads

    Anja Niedringhaus / AP

    More than ten years after the beginning of the war, Afghanistan faces external pressure to reform as well as ongoing internal conflicts.

    Launch slideshow

    “We have our own security forces, the Afghan police and army,” said 28-year-old Sofia Farkhunda. “They are working for the community. They have controlled the situation very well. That’s why I’m hopeful that everything will go well because our police are better prepared and trained.”

    The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), the NATO-led group involving some 66,000 American troops, echoed that confidence.

    "The Afghan people should not fear Taliban threats," ISAF said in a statement. "The Afghan National Security Forces have wisely used the winter months to prepare for taking over the security lead throughout Afghanistan by mid-2013. They are ready."

    New Taliban offensive
    The Taliban dubbed its operation "Khalid bin Waleed," honoring the Islamic general known as the "Drawn Sword of God" and a companion of the prophet Muhammad.

    "We once again call on all the officials and workers of the stooge Karzai regime to break away from this decaying administration in order to conform to Islamic commands, national interests and protection of yourselves, and to choose a life of prosperity living alongside your own people in an atmosphere of peace and security," the Taliban said in its statement.

    NBC News' Akbar Shinwari and Kiko Itasaka, and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

    Rahmatullah Alizad / AFP - Getty Images

    Men carry the coffins of police officers who were killed in a roadside bomb ambush in Afghanistan's Ghazni province on Sunday.

    Related:

    Plane crash kills four American service members in Afghanistan

    'We have to go': Afghans ready to flee country as foreign troops withdraw

    To Boston From Kabul With Love

    204 comments

    The only thing the Taliban forgot in their last statement was, "and if you don't, we will kill you." As for the storekeeper who complained that NATO hadn't done anything for him......hey bud!!! You get off your duff, and you go out, arm in arm, with the NATO forces, and supply info for them to …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, featured, taliban, nato, isaf, spring-offensive
  • 27
    Apr
    2013
    3:42pm, EDT

    Plane crash kills four American service members in Afghanistan

    By Courtney Kube, Pentagon Producer, NBC News

    Four American service members were killed Saturday in an airplane crash in southern Afghanistan, a U.S. military official said.


    Follow @NBCNewsWorld

    The cause of the crash is under investigation, but the International Security Assistance Force said in a brief statement that initial reports indicated the crash did not involve enemy activity.

    The province's police chief told Reuters that bad weather caused the crash in Zabul province in the district of Shahjoi. A U.S. diplomat was killed along with several other Americans in a bomb blast in Zabul province earlier this month.


    The Department of Defense on Sunday identified the four Americans that were killed: Captain Brandon L. Cyr, 28, of Woodbridge, Va.; Capt. Reid K. Nishizuka, 30, of Kailua, Hawaii; Staff Sergeant Richard A. Dickson, 24, of Rancho Cordova, Calif.;  Staff Sergeant Daniel N. Fannin, 30, of Morehead, Ky.  

    The plane that crashed was an MC-12, a twin-engine turboprop aircraft used primarily for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.

    Related:

    • Young diplomat was among 6 Americans killed in Afghanistan
    • 'We have to go': Afghans ready to flee country as foreign troops withdraw
    • 54 killed, 90 wounded in attack on Afghan compound

    75 comments

    We need to get out of there and just let them kill each other like they have been doing for thousands of years. You cannot civilize these people.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, nato, isaf
  • 23
    Apr
    2013
    9:22am, EDT

    Israel: Syria has used chemical weapons, victims seen 'foaming from the mouth'

    By Ian Johnston, Andrea Mitchell and Courtney Kube, NBC News

    Syrian government forces have used chemical weapons in the country’s civil war, the Israeli military’s top intelligence analyst said on Tuesday, citing photographic evidence of people "foaming from the mouth."

    If the claim by Brigadier-General Itai Brun is confirmed, it would mean Syria’s President Bashar Assad has crossed what the State Department has previously described as a red line that would trigger some form of U.S. response. President Barack Obama also warned Assad using chemical weapons would be a "tragic mistake" that would have "consequences."

    Brun told a conference at the Institute of National Security in Tel Aviv that photographs of victims showing foam coming out of their mouths and contracted pupils were signs that a deadly gas had been used.

    "One of the main characteristics of the recent events in Syria is the increasing use of ground-to-ground missiles, rockets and chemical weapons by the Syrian regime. There is a wide-range usage of missile, rockets and more by the Syrian weapons array," he said, according to a translated transcript of his remarks provided by the Israel Defense Forces.

    "According to our professional assessment, the regime has used deadly chemical weapons against armed rebels on a number of occasions in the past few months," he said.

    "For instance, on March 19, 2013, victims suffered from shrunken pupils, foaming from the mouth, and other symptoms which indicate the use of deadly chemical weapons. The type of chemical weapons was likely sarin, as well as neutralizing and non-lethal chemical weapons," he added.

    According to the Centers for Disease Control, sarin, a nerve agent, causes symptoms including loss of consciousness, convulsions, paralysis, and respiratory failure that can be fatal.

    George Ourfalian / Reuters file

    Animal carcasses lie on the ground after what residents, Syrian rebels and Assad's regime all said was a chemical weapon attack in Khan al-Assal near the northern city of Aleppo, on March 23.

    In March, Assad's regime and the rebels blamed each other for what both said was a chemical-weapon attack in Aleppo.

    Responding to Brun’s comments, Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said in a written statement that the United States “continues to assess reports of chemical weapons use in Syria.”

    “The use of such weapons would be entirely unacceptable. We reiterate in the strongest possible terms the obligations of the Syrian regime to safeguard its chemical weapons stockpiles, and not to use or transfer such weapons to terrorist groups like Hezbollah,” he added.

    On Monday, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the use of chemical weapons by Assad's forces would be a "game changer" and the United States and Israel "have options for all contingencies," Reuters reported.

    Hagel met Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem on Tuesday, the news service said, a day after flying in an Israeli military helicopter over the occupied Golan Heights on the edge of the fighting in Syria that has entered its third year.

    Slideshow: Syria uprising

    /

    A look back at the conflict that has overtaken the country.

    Launch slideshow

    "This is a difficult and dangerous time, this is a time when friends and allies must remain close, closer than ever," Hagel, in remarks to reporters before his talks with Netanyahu, said about the United States and Israel.

    Secretary of State John Kerry, who was in Belgium for a NATO meeting on Tuesday, that he did not have information that confirmed that the Syrians had used chemical weapons.

    Earlier he said the alliance needed to consider its role in the crisis, Reuters reported. "We should also carefully and collectively consider how NATO is prepared to respond to protect its members from a Syrian threat, including any potential chemical weapons threat," he added.

    Kerry said that the planning the alliance had already done was appropriate. 

    Reuters contributed to this report.

    Related:

    Syrian activists say Assad loyalists 'massacre' 85 in Damascus suburb

    'Suffocating in the streets': Chemical weapons attack reported in Syria

    Obama warns Syria's Assad not to use chemical weapons

    473 comments

    Wonder how long it will take the haters to come out and start blaming Israel for responsibility for the alleged gassing? Not long I imagine.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: featured, israel, world, middle-east, syria, nato, bashar-assad, chuck-hagel, chemical-weapons
  • 9
    Apr
    2013
    10:15am, EDT

    2 US service members killed in Afghanistan helicopter crash

    Rahmat Gul/AP

    U.S. Black Hawk helicopters arrive to the scene after a NATO helicopter crashed in a field killing two American service members, near Gerakhel, eastern Afghanistan, on April 9.

    By John Newland, Staff Writer, NBC News

    Two American service members were killed in a helicopter crash Tuesday in eastern Afghanistan, the military said.

    A spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force said Tuesday that there was no enemy activity in the area when the crash occurred and that the cause was under investigation.

    The helicopter went down in the Pachir Agam district of Nangarhar province, Reuters quoted Ahmad Zia Abdulzai, a spokesman for the governor's office, as saying.

     

     

    52 comments

    RIP and Thank You for your service. Standing for those who stood for us....

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, featured, military, nato, deaths, helicopter-crash, two-killed
  • 6
    Apr
    2013
    11:57am, EDT

    Afghan attacks kill three US soldiers, four others, officials say

    A car bomb attack killed six people, including three U.S. soldiers and an Afghan doctor, in southern Afghanistan on Saturday and an American civilian died in a separate attack in the east. NBC's Ron Mott reports.

    By Ismail Sameem, Reuters

    KANDAHAR, Afghanistan -- A car bomb attack killed six people, including three U.S. soldiers and an Afghan doctor, in southern Afghanistan on Saturday and an American civilian died in a separate attack in the east, local and international officials said.

    The attacks came as the top U.S. general, Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, arrived in the country for a short visit to assess how much training Afghan troops need before U.S. troops pull out as planned by the end of 2014.

    The American troops were traveling in a convoy of vehicles in Qalat, the capital of Zabul province, when the car bomb exploded. Provincial governor Mohammad Ashraf Nasery was unharmed but a local doctor and two foreign civilians also died, according to local and NATO officials.


    The convoy was near a hospital and a NATO base at the time of the explosion. Five Afghans, including a student and two reporters, were wounded, a local official said.

     

     

    In a separate attack in Afghanistan's east, an American civilian working with the U.S. government was killed during an insurgent attack, the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force said in a statement.

    Zabul shares borders with Pakistan to the southeast and the birthplace of the Taliban, Kandahar province, to the south.


    Follow @NBCNewsWorld

    The Taliban claimed responsibility for the Zabul attack in a text message from spokesman Qari Yousuf Ahmadi. He said a car bomb killed seven foreigners and wounded five others, though he later revised the toll to 13 foreigners killed and nine wounded.

    The Taliban routinely exaggerates casualty figures.

    The killings come in the wake of a bloody Taliban assault in the country's west on Wednesday that killed 44 people in a courtroom in Farah province. The United Nations says civilians are being increasingly targeted in 2013.

    In a statement posted online earlier on Saturday, Taliban spokesman Ahmadi said the Taliban would continue to target Afghan judges and prosecutors.

    "The Islamic Emirate, from today onwards, will keep a close watch over courthouses, all its personnel and all those who try to harm Mujahideen and will deal with them the same as the judges and prosecutors of Farah."

     

    Related content:

    • 'We have to go': Afghans ready to flee country as foreign troops withdraw

       

    Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

    53 comments

    Time for our soldiers to come home...leaving that Bushy mess behind.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, nato, car-bomb
  • 6
    Apr
    2013
    4:39am, EDT

    'We have to go': Afghans ready to flee country as foreign troops withdraw

    As tens of thousands of American troops prepare to withdraw from Afghanistan in time for the 2014 deadline set by the White House, another exodus is gathering pace: Afghans fleeing their country's violence and economic uncertainty. NBC's Mandy Clark reports.

    By Mandy Clark, Correspondent, NBC News

    KABUL, Afghanistan -- As tens of thousands of American troops prepare to withdraw from Afghanistan in time for the 2014 deadline set by the White House, another exodus is gathering pace: Afghans fleeing their country’s violence and economic uncertainty.

    “The international community is leaving and we are right behind them,” Khalid Gul, a 23-year-old university student, said in a trendy Kabul café. “Ninety percent of Afghans, they want to leave Afghanistan for the same reason: education and instability.” 

    He and his friends frequently discuss how they would leave and where they would go. Their top choices are America, Canada and Europe.

    “If Americans – the soldiers and the troops – leave here we will have no proper security and we will have the Taliban here again,” Shorab Shinwari, a 21-year-old IT expert, said.

    Slideshow: Afghanistan: Nation at a crossroads

    Rahmat Gul / AP

    More than ten years after the beginning of the war, Afghanistan faces external pressure to reform as well as ongoing internal conflicts.

    Launch slideshow

    The threat of political upheaval is another worry, with the presidential election scheduled for April next year.

    And as international funding dries up and with many international companies due to shut down after the departure of foreign troops, Afghanistan’s economy is set to shrink dramatically. Foreign embassies are also being scaled down. 

    “Fear of instability in 2014 is driving emigration of the very people and money that could prevent instability,” STATT, an NGO that does research and polling, said in its January 2013 Afghan Migration in Flux report. “Most foresee a future of conflict, instability and chaos as fait accompli for the country.”

    Some Afghans scrambling to get out any way they can are paying $30,000 to 50,000 on the black market for fake passports and passage to another country, an exorbitant sum in a country where average annual income is estimated to be under the $500 a year. A recent Afghan police raid picked up dozens of false Canadian, Pakistani and Afghan passports and numerous forged visas. 

    Meanwhile the rural poor – farmers and laborers – have fewer options. If they are forced to move because of violence, they often end up unemployed in refugee camps, which many find shameful.

    Muhammed Muheisen / AP

    Afghan refugee Abdulkareem Khan, 80, smokes a cigarette while watching his sheep, not pictured, feeding in a field on the on the outskirts of Islamabad, Pakistan, on April 3. Abdulkareem, a shepherd from Afghanistan's north-eastern city of Kunduz, fled the violence in his hometown in 2007 along with 22 members of his family and 60 sheep and took refuge in Pakistan.

    Ali, a herder from Ghanzi province, has been in Kabul for three weeks living on handouts. He said he will probably return to the violent territory because “it is better than this life,” referring to living like a refugee. 

    Afghans already make up the biggest refugee population in the world at almost 3 million, with waves having left during the Soviet occupation in the 1980s and again during the country’s civil war a decade later, according to the UNHCR.

    Some 5.7 million Afghans returned in the first few years after the 2001 U.S.-led intervention that toppled the Taliban regime, hopeful that living conditions in their country were improving.

    With peace and prosperity remaining elusive, the tide of migrants shifted again.  In 2011, more people fled Afghanistan than in any other year since the start of the decade-long war, according to the latest statistics published by the UNHCR in January 2012.

     Nearly 36,000 Afghans applied for political asylum worldwide, but the true number is likely higher because so many are smuggled out and impossible to count. 

    “This last 10 years was an extraordinary period ... [which saw] an extraordinary amount of focus and support for Afghanistan, which is not going to happen again,” said Loftullah Najafizada, head of current affairs at the Afghan news channel, TOLO TV.

    Muhammed Muheisen / AP

    Afghan refugee children play with tires on the outskirts of Islamabad, Pakistan, on March 1. Pakistan hosts over 1.6 million registered Afghans, the largest and most protracted refugee population in the world.

    “We have to understand that as a poor South Asian country we have to face some of these challenges which are pretty natural to a war-torn country coming out of decades of conflict. You cannot skip that challenge; you have to walk through it and it takes time,” he said.

    Shorab Shinwari and his friends aren’t waiting.

    “I thought our country was going to develop, I was hoping to live here and have a good future,” Shinwari said. “Nobody wants to live in such a country where there is war. Everyone wants to have a good life.”

    “I can do nothing for Afghanistan so I have to leave Afghanistan,” his friend, Khalid Gul, agreed. “We have to go. That is the full and final answer.”

    Related:

    54 killed, 90 wounded in attack on Afghan compound

    Afghan villagers flee their homes, blame US drones

    War of words erupts in Afghanistan over 2014 US troop pullout

     

    517 comments

    Sometimes you just can't fix it. Terrorists, greed and stupidity are hard enemies to face.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, featured, nato, refugees, mandy-clark
  • Updated
    12
    Mar
    2013
    7:44pm, EDT

    Five US troops killed in helicopter crash, officials say

    The helicopter went down in bad weather and officials say it appeared to be an accident and not the result of enemy fire. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

    By Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News

    Five U.S. service members died Monday when a helicopter crashed in the Kandahar province of southern Afghanistan, officials said Tuesday.

    The cause of the crash was under investigation, but a statement from the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force said "there was no enemy activity in the area at the time of the incident."

    The names of the troops killed had not been released by U.S. officials Tuesday, but officials in the U.S. and Afghanistan said that all of those killed were American.

    The helicopter went down west of the city of Kandahar, in the Daman district, coalition and Afghan officials said.

    U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Les Carroll, an ISAF spokesman, said the incident happened in darkness.

    Earlier in the day, two U.S. service members and three Afghans were killed in a possible insider attack at a special forces site in Afghanistan. The gunman in that attack was dressed in an Afghan National Security Forces uniform.

    The attack, which occurred shortly after newly appointed Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel concluded his first trip to the country as head of the Pentagon, was just the latest in a string of bad news centered on the United States' relationship with Afghanistan.

    Hagel's trip was marked criticism from Afghan President Hamid Karzai over the U.S. role in the country and the cancellation of a joint press conference due to "security concerns."

    There have been 18 coalition deaths this year.

    NBC News' Jamieson Lesko, Courtney Kube and Jim Miklaszewski contributed to this report.

    Slideshow: Afghanistan: Nation at a crossroads

    Rahmat Gul / AP

    More than ten years after the beginning of the war, Afghanistan faces external pressure to reform as well as ongoing internal conflicts.

    Launch slideshow

    This story was originally published on Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:25 PM EDT

    111 comments

    Any death is sad, but today's high death numbers makes it an especially difficult day for the military. We need to get out of that hell hole ASAP. If Karzai thinks we're coercing with the Taliban, great. No reason to stick around any longer.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, crash, nato, updated, karzai, hagel
  • 4
    Mar
    2013
    12:03pm, EST

    Afghanistan following 11 years of US combat: 'Not much different'

    Photo by Daniel Berehulak / Getty Images

    Traffic moves through the old city in November, 2012, in Kabul, Afghanistan.

    By Mike Taibbi, Correspondent, NBC News

    KABUL, Afghanistan —  I wondered, approaching Kabul over the snow-shrouded Hindu Kush mountains, what the story of the moment would be in the teeming city below. 

    It had been six years since I’d last visited Afghanistan’s capital, a short visit then that included an interview with President Hamid Karzai as part of the last of six long reporting assignments since 9/11— that one stretching from Paktika and Gardez in the southeast to Herat in the west.


    Mike Taibbi / NBC News

    A spectacular view over the snow-covered Hindu Kush peaks on the way into Kabul.

    More than 11 years had passed since my first Afghan assignment, over the Kyber Pass from Pakistan and then into Jalalabad days after the Taliban had fled;  the arc of America’s longest war.

    "Not much different," offered my seatmate, a senior NATO official from one of the 40 countries remaining in the coalition that has alternately steered or suffered through Afghanistan’s bloody march toward stand-alone status as a reconstituted nation.

    "You’ll see some new construction under way in the city, but on the surface it’ll be little changed from what you saw before."

    Driving to our quarters, I found myself playing an old game: peering at the cars huffing and puffing along the city’s crowded streets, I counted the number of women drivers.  And got the same answer I’d counted on most days, 11 years ago.

    Zero.

    * * * * *

    That so few women drive — cars, bicycles, any conveyance where they are unaccompanied by men — is a relatively small fact of life here but it’s emblematic.  

    Afghanistan is still waiting for the changes that will signal that a threshold has been reached, and a fundamental change in the status of women, and in their prospects after the 2014 withdrawal of most coalition combat troops, is one of the changes that matter.

    Mike Taibbi / NBC News

    Kimberly Motley, an American lawyer, has been living and working in Afghanistan for the past five years as an advocate for abused women.

    It’s women who will suffer most after the withdrawal, said Kimberly Motley, an American lawyer living and working in Afghanistan for the past five years as an advocate for abused women. 

    "I’ve been surprised that it’s been mostly men now clamoring desperately for a way to leave, when it’s women who will be affected so profoundly," she said.  

    With NATO forces gone they’ll have far less protection, she told us, while even under the limited protection that now exists there have been attacks against women so savage as to have commanded headlines worldwide. 

    It’s been a consensus in the international community that this poorest and most corrupt of countries may yet be welcomed fully as a sovereign nation, but only when its women are treated with dignity and as equals under law and custom. While serving as secretary of state in 2001, Colin Powell stressed that women's rights were “non-negotiable.”

    * * * * * 

    As for negotiations for peace and reconciliation with the Taliban, they are, for all practical purposes, non-existent.  A handful of self-described representatives of Taliban leadership have set up office space in Doha, Qatar, and overtures have been made with the goal of starting substantive talks.

    "But here’s the problem," a highly placed Western diplomat told me, asking that he not be identified. "Karzai only wants face-to-face discussions with the Taliban, at the negotiating table — and not with interlocutors who may or may not represent Mullah Mohammed Omar and the true Taliban leadership.  He’s not interested in discussing theoretical possibilities, if nothing of consequence is going to happen."

    The Taliban, meanwhile, seem uninterested in discussing any possibilities short of a return to complete power in Afghanistan. 

    Said Maulvi Shahabuddin Dilawar, one of the Taliban's "negotiators" in Doha, there will be a "snowball effect" after the 2014 withdrawal, the Taliban waiting patiently to make their move. 

    "Anything short of a total victory,” he said, “is unacceptable." There’s a saying here, attributed to the Taliban: "They have the weapons; we have the time."

    Still, the Western diplomat said, "We’ve opened a door in Doha, and hopefully there will be an answer and real negotiations might begin."

    I reminded him of the timeworn political cliché, "Hope is not a strategy."

    He smiled. "Well, it’s more than mere hope," he said.

    The diplomat talked about advances on the periphery of the central questions about peace talks and post-2014 security: an imminent new mining law that will encourage foreign investors to ante in for a stake in the trillion dollars in copper, iron, gold and oil reserves within reach beneath this country’s battered landscape;  advances despite notable setbacks in the training and readiness of Afghanistan’s army and national police forces; real improvements in the prospects for some women — in medicine, law and even the armed services.  

    "It’s not just hope," the diplomat repeated.

    * * * * * 

    An old friend named Shirzad came by to visit on Saturday.  He had worked for NBC News in the past and asked that we not use his family name for security reasons.  

    We talked about the days and months just after 9/11, when we first met, when in his home city of Jalalabad the Taliban had suddenly fled under the punishment of American bombing raids, and the eventual insertion of American special forces chasing Bin Laden and his surrogates through the mountains and caves of Tora Bora. 

    There were so many signs of optimism then: little girls lining up giddily to go to school, some women braving the markets having shed their burqas, talk among the men about a new future when none had seemed possible for so many years.

    Slideshow: Afghanistan: Nation at a crossroads

    Rahmat Gul / AP

    More than ten years after the beginning of the war, Afghanistan faces external pressure to reform as well as ongoing internal conflicts.

    Launch slideshow

    But that future had not arrived, Shirzad said. The Taliban were a "shadow government" in so many villages and neighborhoods, in control by implication and threat, just waiting.

    "My family, and many of those I work with, we have been threatened with death." So he’s leaving, he says, having spent months negotiating a labyrinth of paperwork to gain approval to take his family of nine to the U.S. and take his chances there if he can. 

    His brother, with his family of eight, is trying for the same option. "It is the only way for me," he told me. "The local police, they will not protect us when NATO soldiers are gone — many are Taliban or support them."

    He offered a sad smile: "No more for me, in Afghanistan."

    What there is, he said, is corruption and danger in every direction.  Away from Kabul there were still drug lords ruling over fiefdoms fueled by flourishing poppy fields. Even in Kabul, he said, travel can be treacherous, trust unwise.

    And attorney Motley has more clients than she can handle.

    And 30 local police died in a two-day period last week in three suicide attacks for which the Taliban claimed credit.

    And President Karzai complains about not getting enough American weapons and support, while at the same time ordering that American and NATO forces withdraw from a Kabul suburb because of unconfirmed rumors of harassment and attacks against civilians.

    And in my third trip through the streets of a city I hadn’t seen in years, I looked again for any women drivers.

    And couldn't find a single one. Again.

    Related:

    Ultimate taboo: Actress takes on rape in Afghanistan

    Meet Afghanistan's first female rapper

    As Taliban regroup, victims battle for 'free' Afghanistan

    469 comments

    2000: George Bush's presidential campaign. "You can't go around the world and tell countries how they should be. It's called "Nation Building" and that wouldn't be a good policy." 2003. George Bush: "We will defeat the terrorists and bring democratic principles to Afghanistan.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, featured, nato, hamid-karzai, kabul, mike-taibbi, womens-right
  • 2
    Mar
    2013
    10:13pm, EST

    NATO says its troops killed 2 Afghan boys

    NATO said on Saturday its forces had accidentally shot dead two Afghan boys in the latest of a series of reports of civilian deaths at the hands of international troops.

    The shooting in the southern province of Uruzgan could further strain the relationship between the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who has demanded U.S. special forces leave another province over allegations of torture.


    Follow @NBCNewsWorld

    The two boys were shot dead when they were mistaken for insurgents during an operation in northwest Uruzgan on February 28, ISAF commander, U.S. General Joseph Dunford, said in a statement.

    "I offer my personal apology and condolences to the family of the boys who were killed," Dunford said.

    "The boys were killed when Coalition forces fired at what they thought were insurgent forces," he said, adding that a team of Afghan and ISAF investigators visited the village on Saturday and met local leaders.

    The area, Lowar-e-Dowahom, was often patrolled by international troops, a spokesman for provincial governor Amir Mohammad Akhundzada said.

    "They saw two young children who were apparently listening to a radio and they shot them - it is not yet clear why," the spokesman said.

    Australian forces deployed in Uruzgan said earlier there had been an "operational incident" in the province's northwest but gave no details except that no soldiers were harmed.

    On Feb. 13 a NATO air strike requested by Afghan forces killed 10 people - including five children and four women - in the eastern province of Kunar, prompting Karzai to ban his troops from requesting foreign air strikes.

    Two weeks later he halted all special forces operations in the central province of Wardak after a series of allegations involving U.S. special forces soldiers and Afghan men said to be working with them.

    Reuters

    62 comments

    If Karzai wants us gone just withdraw his security. when he gets blown up in a week's time we can see if the next guy is willing to play ball

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, featured, nato
  • 10
    Feb
    2013
    9:01am, EST

    Final stretch? New US commander takes helm in Afghanistan

    Omar Sobhani / AP

    Gen. John Allen, left, the outgoing U.S. and NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) commander in Afghanistan stand with Gen. Joseph Dunford who replaced him during a changing of command ceremony in Kabul, Afghanistan, on Sunday.

    By Patrick Quinn, The Associated Press

    KABUL, Afghanistan - Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford took over Sunday as the new and probably last commander of all U.S. and international forces in Afghanistan. 

    The American-led NATO coalition is entering the final stretch of its participation in a war that will have lasted more than 13 years when most foreign combat troops pull out at the end of 2014. 

    Dunford took over leadership of the International Security Assistance Force, and a smaller but separate detachment of American troops, from Marine Gen. John Allen, who had led them for the past 19 months. 

    "Today is not about change, it's about continuity," Dunford told a gathering of coalition military leaders and Afghan officials. "What's not changed is the growing capability of our Afghan partners, the Afghan national security forces. What's not changed is our commitment, more importantly, what's not changed is the inevitability of our success." 

    He takes charge at a critical time for President Barack Obama and the military. NATO decided at its 2010 summit in Lisbon to withdraw major combat units, but to continue training and funding Afghan troops and leave a residual force to hunt down al-Qaida and other terrorist groups. 

    Slideshow: Afghanistan: Nation at a crossroads

    Aref Karimi / AFP - Getty Images

    More than ten years after the beginning of the war, Afghanistan faces external pressure to reform as well as ongoing internal conflicts.

    Launch slideshow

    Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said "much work lies ahead" for Dunford as he tries to meet those objectives while at the same time withdrawing about 100,000 foreign troops, including 66,000 from the United States. 

    Dunford, from Boston, Massachusetts, will face serious challenges as he tries to accommodate an accelerated timetable for handing over the lead for security responsibility to Afghan forces this spring — instead of late summer as originally planned. 

    "I told him our victory here will never be marked by a parade or a point in time on a calendar when victory is declared. This insurgency will be defeated over time by the legitimate and well-trained Afghan forces that are emerging today and who are taking the field in full force this spring," Allen said. 

    He added that success would be described as an "Afghan force defending Afghan people, and enabling an Afghan government to serve its citizens. This is victory; this is what winning looks like." Although the Afghan security forces are almost at their full strength of 352,000, it is unclear if they are yet ready to take on the fight by themselves. 

    Also attending the ceremony were U.S. Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mattis, Commander, U.S. Central Command, and Gen. James Amos, head of the Marine Corps. President Hamid Karzai did not attend. 

    More work needed
    Before departing, Allen admitted that the Afghans still need much work to become an effective and self-sufficient fighting machine, but he said a vast improvement in their abilities was behind a decision to accelerate the timetable for putting them in the lead nationwide this spring when the traditional fighting season begins. 

    Obama said last month that the Afghans would take over this spring instead of late summer — a decision that could allow the speedier withdrawal of foreign forces from Afghanistan. 

    It is also unclear when the remaining 66,000 U.S. troops would return home, or how many American soldiers will remain after the end of 2014. 


    Follow @NBCNewsWorld

    Obama may use his State of the Union address on Tuesday to announce the next steps for concluding the war and a timetable for withdrawal along with plans for a residual force post-2014. 

    Much of that depends on the U.S. negotiating a bilateral security agreement with the government that includes the contentious issue of immunity from Afghan prosecution for any U.S. forces that would remain here after 2014.  Karzai has said he will put any such decision in the hands of a council of Afghan elders, known as a Loya Jirga. 

    Although Dempsey said earlier in the week that the United States had plans to leave a residual force, a failure to strike a deal on immunity would torpedo any security agreement and lead to a complete pullout of U.S. forces after 2014 — as it did in post-war Iraq.

    It is widely believed that no NATO-member nation would allow its troops to remain after 2014 to train, or engage in counterterrorism activities, without a similar deal. 

    The head of NATO joint command in Europe, German Gen. Hans-Lothar Domrose, said the alliance was already making plans for a post-2014 presence, plans he said that were "all well advanced." 

    Related: 

    Two more Marines charged in scandal over Afghan urination video

    Afghanistan's Karzai on Prince Harry's bravado, Britain's involvement in war

    Ten Afghan police officers killed in suicide attack

    © 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    43 comments

    Same old bull @!$%# different commander lol

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, featured, nato, allen, karzai, isaf, dunford
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • world-news,
  • syria,
  • china,
  • europe,
  • afghanistan,
  • world,
  • middle-east,
  • israel,
  • pakistan,
  • egypt,
  • iran,
  • russia,
  • updated,
  • uk,
  • north-korea,
  • africa,
  • london,
  • military,
  • assad,
  • france,
  • protest,
  • environment,
  • al-qaida,
  • britain,
  • taliban,
  • italy,
  • nuclear,
  • terrorism,
  • india,
  • asia,
  • germany,
  • japan,
  • vatican,
  • economy,
  • human-rights,
  • crime,
  • south-africa,
  • mexico,
  • pope
Also

Top NBCNews.com headlines

3147,10
Advertise | AdChoices

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (179)
    • April (275)
    • March (432)
    • February (332)
    • January (323)
  • 2012
    • December (332)
    • November (332)
    • October (313)
    • September (360)
    • August (362)
    • July (310)
    • June (351)
    • May (427)
    • April (404)
    • March (427)
    • February (347)
    • January (284)
  • 2011
    • December (357)
    • November (3)

Most Commented

  • 'Leave our lands': Man knifed to death in suspected London terror attack (744)
  • Sweden stunned by third night of rioting (590)
  • Chef to the stars Miki Nozawa dies following confrontation over unpaid bill (416)
  • North Korea fires more missiles, condemns US and South for 'war measures' (494)
  • Six Americans, Afghan children among dead in Kabul suicide attack (537)
  • 'Love has won out over hate': France becomes 14th country to allow gay marriage (1610)
  • Palestinian kids swept up in wave of Israeli arrests (382)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • World news on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise